Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACTIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources

Actins from plant and animal sources tend not to form heteropolymers in vitro and function differently in plant cells.

Pollen and skeletal muscle actins were purified and labeled with fluorescent dyes that have different emission wavelengths. Observation by electron microscopy shows that the fluorescent actins are capable to polymerize into filamentous actin in vitro, bind to myosin S-1 fragments, and have a critical concentration similar to unlabeled actin, indicating that they are functionally active. The globular actins from two sources were mixed and polymerized by the addition of ATP and salts. The copolymerization experiment shows that when excited by light of the appropriate wavelength, both red actin filaments (pollen actin) and green actin filaments (muscle actin) can be visualized under the microscope, but no filaments exhibiting both green and red colors are detected. Furthermore, coprecipitations of labeled pollen actin with unlabeled pollen and skeletal muscle actin were performed. Measurements of fluorescent intensity show that the amount of labeled pollen actin precipitating with pollen actin was much higher than that with skeletal muscle actin, indicating that pollen and muscle actin tend not to form heteropolymers. Injection of labeled pollen actin into living stamen hair cells results in the formation of normal actin filaments in transvacuolar strands and the cortical cytoplasm. In contrast, labeled skeletal muscle actin has detrimental effects on the cellular architecture. The results from coinjection of the actin-disrupting reagent cytochalasin D with pollen actin show that overexpression of pollen actin prolongs the displacement of the nucleus and facilitates the recovery of the nuclear position, actin filament architecture, and transvacuolar strands. However, muscle actin perturbs actin filaments when injected into stamen hair cells. Moreover, nuclear displacement occurs more rapidly when cytochalasin D and muscle actin are coinjected into the cell. It is concluded that actins from plant and animal sources behave differently in vitro and in vivo and that they are functionally not interchangeable.

Actins↗

Incorporation and turnover of biotin-labeled actin microinjected into fibroblastic cells: an immunoelectron microscopic study.

We investigated the mechanism of turnover of an actin microfilament system in fibroblastic cells on an electron microscopic level. A new derivative of actin was prepared by labeling muscle actin with biotin. Cultured fibroblastic cells were microinjected with biotinylated actin, and incorporated biotin-actin molecules were detected by immunoelectron microscopy using an anti-biotin antibody and a colloidal gold-labeled secondary antibody. We also analyzed the localization of injected biotin-actin molecules on a molecular level by freeze-drying techniques. Incorporation of biotin-actin was rapid in motile peripheral regions, such as lamellipodia and microspikes. At approximately 1 min after injection, biotin-actin molecules were mainly incorporated into the distal part of actin bundles in the microspikes. Heavily labeled actin filaments were also observed at the distal fringe of the densely packed actin networks in the lamellipodium. By 5 min after injection, most actin polymers in microspikes and lamellipodia were labeled uniformly. These findings suggest that actin subunits are added preferentially at the membrane-associated ends of preexisting actin filaments. At earlier times after injection, we often observed that the labeled segments were continuous with unlabeled segments, suggesting the incorporation of new subunits at the ends of preexisting filaments. Actin incorporation into stress fibers was a slower process. At 2-3 min after injection, microfilaments at the surface of stress fibers incorporated biotin-actin, but filaments in the core region of stress fibers did not. At 5-10 min after injection, increasing density of labeling along stress fibers toward their distal ends was observed. Stress fiber termini are generally associated with focal contacts. There was no rapid nucleation of actin filaments off the membrane of focal contacts and the pattern of actin incorporation at focal contacts was essentially identical to that into distal parts of stress fibers. By 60 min after injection, stress fibers were labeled uniformly. We also analyzed the actin incorporation into polygonal nets of actin bundles. Circular dense foci, where actin bundles radiate, were stable structures, and actin filaments around the foci incorporated biotin-actin the slowest among the actin-containing structures within the injected cells. These results indicate that the rate and pattern of actin subunit incorporation differ in different regions of the cytoplasm and suggest the possible role of rapid actin polymerization at the leading margin on the protrusive movement of fibroblastic cells.

Actins↗

Mechanisms responsible for F-actin stabilization after lysis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

While actin polymerization and depolymerization are both essential for cell movement, few studies have focused on actin depolymerization. In vivo, depolymerization can occur exceedingly rapidly and in a spatially defined manner: the F-actin in the lamellipodia depolymerizes in 30 s after chemoattractant removal (Cassimeris, L., H. McNeill, and S. H. Zigmond. 1990. J. Cell Biol. 110:1067-1075). To begin to understand the regulation of F-actin depolymerization, we have examined F-actin depolymerization in lysates of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Surprisingly, much of the cell F-actin, measured with a TRITC-phalloidin-binding assay, was stable after lysis in a physiological salt buffer (0.15 M KCl): approximately 50% of the F-actin did not depolymerize even after 18 h. This stable F-actin included lamellar F-actin which could still be visualized one hour after lysis by staining with TRITC-phalloidin and by EM. We investigated the basis for this stability. In lysates with cell concentrations greater than 10(7) cells/ml, sufficient globular actin (G-actin) was present to result in a net increase in F-actin. However, the F-actin stability was not solely because of the presence of free G-actin since addition of DNase I to the lysate did not increase the F-actin loss. Nor did it appear to be because of barbed end capping factors since cell lysates provided sites for barbed end polymerization of exogenous added actin. The stable F-actin existed in a macromolecular complex that pelleted at low gravitational forces. Increasing the salt concentration of the lysis buffer decreased the amount of F-actin that pelleted at low gravitational forces and increased the amount of F-actin that depolymerized. Various actin-binding and cross-linking proteins such as tropomyosin, alpha-actinin, and actin-binding protein pelleted with the stable F-actin. In addition, we found that alpha-actinin, a filament cross-linking protein, inhibited the rate of pyrenyl F-actin depolymerization. These results suggested that actin cross-linking proteins may contribute to the stability of cellular actin after lysis. The activity of crosslinkers may be regulated in vivo to allow rapid turnover of lamellipodia F-actin.

Actinin↗

Unusual metabolism of the yeast actin amino terminus.

In this paper we have examined the post-translational modifications of the NH2 terminus of actin from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Like actins examined previously, this actin contains an acetylated NH2 terminus. Actins in other organisms undergo a unique post-translational processing event in which the initial amino acid(s) are removed by an actin-specific processing enzyme in an acetylation-dependent reaction. This is defined as actin processing. In yeast, actin retains its initiator Met in vivo and is thus not processed even though a rat liver actin processing enzyme can process yeast actin in vitro. This lack of actin processing appears to be a general property of fungi, as the actin from three other species, Aspergillus nidulans, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and Candida albicans are not NH2 terminally processed either. Yeast actin is a class I actin; its initiator Met directly precedes an acidic residue. We converted yeast actin to a class II species by inserting a Cys codon between the Met-1 and Asp-2 codons. In normal class II actins the Cys residue is removed as acetyl-Cys during processing. Neither the mutant actin nor chick beta-actin (a class I actin) are processed when expressed in yeast. S. cerevisiae thus appears to be also incapable of processing exogenous actins. Further study of the mutant actin containing a Cys at position 2 shows that 30-40% of this actin is stably unacetylated. This unacetylated actin does not have a shorter half-life than the acetylated form. From these studies we conclude that 1) NH2-terminal actin-specific processing is not required for actin function in yeast and three other fungi, 2) yeast are apparently incapable of processing any type of actin precursor, and 3) the stability of a yeast pseudo-class II actin is not affected by the acetylation state of the NH2 terminus.

Acetylation↗

Intracellular localization and biochemical function of variant beta-actin, which inhibits metastasis of B16 melanoma.

We analyzed the biochemical nature of beta m-actin protein found in mouse B16 melanoma. When we carried out immunostaining with the antibody specific to beta m-actin, filamentous immunofluorescence was observed in B16-F1, a low-metastatic cell line expressing beta m-actin, but not in highly metastatic B16-F10 that did not express beta m-actin. When a purified actin fraction containing beta m-actin was polymerized and immunoprecipitated with anti-beta m-actin antibody, the immunoprecipitate contained beta m-, beta- and gamma-actin. This indicated that the beta m-actin was incorporated into an actin filament together with beta- and gamma-actin in vitro, and this phenomenon was consistently suggested by cellular double immunostaining with anti-beta m-actin and common anti-actin antibody. When the actin fraction containing beta m-actin under a regular depolymerizing condition was subjected to immuno-adsorption assay using anti-beta m antibody and protein-A Sepharose, the immunoadsorbed aggregates contained beta m-, beta- and gamma-actin. This indicates that the actin fraction was not completely depolymerized and contained beta m-actin-containing oligomers, which were too small to be precipitated with anti-beta m-actin antibody alone. The incomplete depolymerization of the beta m-actin-containing fraction was also suggested by the much lower DNase 1 inhibition activity of the beta m-actin-containing fraction than that of beta- and gamma-actin fraction. Furthermore, a DNase 1 binding assay showed that cytoplasmic supernatant prepared from B16-F1 under a low-ionic condition contained less monomeric actin than the cytoplasmic preparation from B16-F10. These results suggested that beta m-actin protein in B16 melanoma probably inhibits the dynamic conversion between the monomeric and polymerized forms of actin, leading to a decrease in cell motility and consequently the suppression of invasiveness and metastasis.

Actins↗

Changes in contractile proteins during differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells. II. Purification and characterization of actin.

A myeloid leukemia cell line, M1, differentiates to macrophage and gains locomotive and phagocytic activity when incubated with conditioned medium (CM) from a fibroblast culture and bacterial endotoxin. To characterize the actin molecules before and after differentiation, the actin was purified through three sequential steps: DEAE-sephadex A- 50, polymerization/depolymerization, and sephadex G-150 chromatography. There were no essential differences between the inhibitory activity of actins from control M1 cells and CM-treated M1 cells on both DNase I and heavy meromyosin (HMMM) K(+)-EDTA-ATPase; the same dose response as with skeletal muscle actin took place. After the treatment with CM, however, the specific activity for the activation of HMMM Mg(2+)- ATPase by actin became two-fold that of untreated M1 actin, which was one third of the value for skeletal muscle actin. The V(max) for the control and the CM-treated M1 cell, as well as the skeletal muscle actins, proved to be the same. By contrast, the K(app) values for the control and CM-treated M1-cell actins were 3- and 1.5-fold the value for skeletal-muscle actin. This means that CM treatment of the M1 actin produced a twofold affinity for the Mg(2+)-ATPase of skeletal-muscle myosin. The critical concentrations for polymerization were compared under different salt concentrations and temperatures. Although no marked difference was found for the presence of 2 mM MgCl(2), 0.1 M KCl in place of MgCl(2) at 5 degrees C gave the following values: 0.1 mg/ml for skeletal-muscle actin, 0.7 mg/ml for control M1 actin, 0,5 mg/ml for CM- treated M1 actin, and 1.0 mg/ml for the D(-) subline that is insensitive to CM. Although the critical concentration of D(-) actin is extraordinarily high, this actin showed normal polymerization above the critical concentration. This together with the data presented in our previous paper, that the D(-) actin in the crude extract did not polymerize, suggests that an inhibitor for actin polymerization is present in the subline. The kinetics experiment at 0.1 M KCl and 25 degrees C revealed a slower polymerization of untreated M1- and D(-)-cell actins as compared with CM-treated M1 actin. This delayed polymerization was due to a delay during the nucleation stage, not during the elongation stage. By isoelectric focusing, the ratios of beta- to gamma-actin showed a marked difference depending on the states of cells: about 4.9 for control M1, 2.8 for CM-treated M1, and 7.6 for D(-)-subline actins. Tryptic peptide maps also revealed the presence of different peptides. Thus, the functional differences of actin before and after the differentiation was accompanied by some chemical changes in actin molecules.

Actins↗

A family of novel actin-inhibiting marine toxins.

1. We have examined the effects of marine toxins with a macrolide structure on actin. These toxins include mycalolide B, aplyronine A and bistheonellide A. 2. Measuring actin polymerization by monitoring fluorescent intensity of pyrenyl-actin, mycalolide B did not accelerate the actin polymerization but quickly depolymerized F-actin. In contrast, cytochalasin D, which inhibits actin polymerization by binding to the barbed end of F-actin, accelerated actin nucleation and depolymerized F-actin at a slower rate. 3. Analysing the kinetics of depolymerization by monitoring the rate of spontaneous depolymerization of F-actin under the unpolymerizable state or the rate of polymerization where F-actin was seeded as a nucleus, mycalolide B was suggested to sever F-actin. 4. The relationship between the concentration of total actin and F-actin at different concentrations of mycalolide B suggests that mycalolide B forms a 1:1 complex with G-actin. Viscometry and electron microscopic observations further suggest that the actin filament was depolymerized by mycalolide B. Furthermore, mycalolide B suppressed actin-activated myosin Mg(2+)-ATPase activity, although cytochalasin D did not. Aplyronine A has similar effects on actin. 5. Bistheonellide A also depolymerized F-actin and sequestered G-actin by forming a 1:2 complex with G-actins, but, its severing effect was not detected. We conclude that mycalolide B, aplyronine A and bistheonellide A are novel types of actin-depolymerizing agents, the mechanism of action of which is different from that of cytochalasin D. These structurally related marine toxins may be categorized as 'actin depolymerizing macrolides' and may serve as novel pharmacological tools for analysing actin-mediated cell functions.

Actins↗

Activation of epithelial Na+ channels by protein kinase A requires actin filaments.

We have recently demonstrated a novel role for "short" actin filaments, a distinct species of polymerized actin different from either monomeric (G-actin) or long actin filaments (F-actin), in the activation of epithelial Na+ channels. In the present study, the role of actin in the activation of apical Na+ channels by the adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) was investigated by patch-clamp techniques in A6 epithelial cells. In excised inside-out patches, addition of deoxyribonuclease I, which prevents actin polymerization, inhibited Na+ channel activation mediated by PKA. Disruption of endogenous actin filament organization with cytochalasin D for at least 1 h prevented the PKA-mediated activation of Na+ channels but not activation following the addition of actin to the cytosolic side of the patch. To assess the role of PKA on actin filament organization, actin was used as a substrate for the specific phosphorylation by the PKA. Actin was phosphorylated by PKA with an equilibrium stoichiometry of 2:1 mol PO4-actin monomer. Actin was phosphorylated in its monomeric form, but only poorly once polymerized. Furthermore, phosphorylated actin reduced the rate of actin polymerization. Thus actin allowed to polymerize for at least 1 h in the presence of PKA and ATP to obtain phosphorylated actin filaments induced Na+ channel activity in excised inside-out patches, in contrast to actin polymerized either in the absence of PKA or in the presence of PKA plus a PKA inhibitor (nonphosphorylated actin filaments). This was also confirmed by using purified phosphorylated G-actin incubated in a polymerizing buffer for at least 1 h at 37 degrees C. These data suggest that the form of actin required for Na+ channel activation (i.e., "short" actin filaments) may be favored by the phosphorylation of G-actin and may thus mediate or facilitate the activation of Na+ channels by PKA.

Actins↗

Intracellular distribution of beta-actin mRNA is polarized in embryonic corneal epithelia.

The intracellular distribution of filamentous actin (F-actin), all actin isoforms and beta-actin mRNA were analyzed in whole-mount preparations of freshly isolated corneal epithelia. Filamentous actin distribution was analyzed with fluorescently tagged phalloidin. An antibody that recognizes an epitope on both globular (G-actin) and F-actin was used in an immunohistochemical analysis of actin protein distribution. Whole-mount epithelial tissues were examined with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Biotinylated oligonucleotide probes specific for the beta-actin mRNA were used, and visualized with avidin-FITC. The intracellular localization of the beta-actin mRNA was similar to the F-actin protein distribution. In the most apical optical sections of embryonic cornea, actin staining delineated the cell borders and microvilli of the periderm cells. The actin is also detected as an organized network at the interface between the basal and periderm cells. At the level of the basal cell nucleus, F-actin is sparse, associating only with the lateral cell membranes. However, at the optical plane below the nuclei, the actin forms an elaborate actin cortical mat. Actin mRNA staining was visualized as discrete punctate areas. The beta-actin mRNA was positive at the optical plane just below the periderm cell apical membrane surface, similar to actin in microvilli. These cells also contained punctate staining near the cell membranes and in the periderm-basal cell junction area. At the level of the basal cell nucleus the actin mRNA was present in a punctate pattern along the cell membranes. Below the basal cell nuclei the actin mRNA staining increased at the level of the actin cortical mat. These experiments are the first demonstration that actin mRNA is polarized in embryonic corneal epithelia and co-localized with actin protein in an intact tissue.

Actins↗

[Cytoskeletal actin and its associated proteins. Some examples in Protista].

Many processes, cell motility being an example, require cells to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in response to both intracellular and extracellular signals. Reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton involves the rapid disassembly and reassembly of actin filaments, a phenomenon regulated by the action of particular actin-binding proteins. In recent years, an interest in studying actin regulation in unicellular organisms has arisen. Parasitic protozoan are among these organisms and studies of the cytoskeleton functions of these protozoan are relevant related to either cell biology or pathogenicity. To discuss recent data in this field, a symposium concerning "Actin and actin-binding proteins in protists" was held on May 8-11 in Paris, France, during the XXXV meeting of the French Society of Protistology. As a brief summary of the symposium we report here findings concerning the in vitro actin dynamic assembly, as well as the characterization of several actin-binding proteins from the parasitic protozoan Entamoeba histolytica, Trichomonas vaginalis and Plasmodium knowlesi. In addition, localization of actin in non-pathogen protists such as Prorocentrum micans and Crypthecodinium cohnii is also presented. The data show that some actin-binding proteins facilitate organization of filaments into higher order structures as pseudopods, while others have regulatory functions, indicating very particular roles for actin-binding proteins. One of the proteins discussed during the symposium, the actin depolymerizing factor ADF, was shown to enhance the treadmilling rate of actin filaments. In vitro, ADF binds to the ADP-bound forms of G-actin and F-actin, thereby participating in and changing the rate of actin assembly. Biochemical approaches allowed the identification of a protein complex formed by HSP/C70-cap32-34 which might also be involved in depolymerization of F-actin in P. knowlesi. Molecular and cellular approaches were used to identify proteins such as ABP-120 and myosin IB at the leading edge of E. histolytica. ABP-120 organizes F-actin in a network and myosin IB participates in the pseudopod formation. Similar approaches using T. vaginalis resulted in the discovery of an actin-binding protein that participate in the F-actin reorganization during adhesion of parasites to target cells. This protein is homologous to alpha-actinin from other eukaryotic cells. Finally, by using cell biology approaches, F-actin was observed in the cytoplasm as well as in the nucleus of Dinoflagellates. The recent developments in the molecular genetics of protozoa will provide new insights to understand the roles of actin-binding proteins during cytoskeleton activities.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Covalent modification of G-actin by pyridoxal 5'-phosphate: polymerization properties and interaction with DNase I and myosin subfragment 1.

Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), a lysine-specific reagent, has been used to modify G-actin. At pH 7.5, PLP reacted with 1.7-2 lysines on G-actin. Limited proteolytic digestion experiments indicated that, in agreement with previous works, essentially lysine-61 was modified in a 1:1 fashion by PLP, other lysines being much less reactive. A PLP-derivatized affinity label of ATP binding sites, AMPPLP, reacted with two additional lysines that do not appear to be located in the ATP site on G-actin. PLP-G-actin did not polymerize spontaneously up to 30 microM; however, it retained other essential native properties of G-actin. PLP-actin bound to the barbed ends of actin filaments with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 4 microM and prevented dilution-induced depolymerization like a capping protein. PLP-actin copolymerized with unmodified actin. The stability of F-actin copolymers decreased with the fraction of PLP-actin incorporated, consistent with a model within which the actin-PLP-actin interactions in the copolymer are 50-fold weaker, and PLP-actin-PLP-actin interactions are 200-fold weaker than regular actin-actin interactions. PLP-actin bound DNase I with an equilibrium association constant of 2 nM-1, i.e., 10-fold lower than that of unmodified actin. PLP modification did not affect the binding of G-actin to myosin subfragment 1. However, polymerization of PLP-actin by myosin subfragment 1 was not observed in low ionic strength buffers, whereas PLP-F-actin-S1 filaments, in which the stoichiometry PLP-actin:S1 is 1:1, were formed with an apparent critical concentration of 4.5 microM in the presence of 0.1 M KCl.

Actins↗

Dictyostelium discoideum plasma membranes contain an actin-nucleating activity that requires ponticulin, an integral membrane glycoprotein.

In previous equilibrium binding studies, Dictyostelium discoideum plasma membranes have been shown to bind actin and to recruit actin into filaments at the membrane surface. However, little is known about the kinetic pathway(s) through which actin assembles at these, or other, membranes. We have used actin fluorescently labeled with N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to examine the kinetics of actin assembly in the presence of D. discoideum plasma membranes. We find that these membranes increase the rate of actin polymerization. The rate of membrane-mediated actin polymerization is linearly dependent on membrane protein concentrations up to 20 micrograms/ml. Nucleation (the association of activated actin monomers into oligomers) appears to be the primary step of polymerization that is accelerated. A sole effect on the initial salt-induced actin conformational change (activation) is ruled out because membranes accelerate the polymerization of pre-activated actin as well as actin activated in the presence of membranes. Elongation of preexisting filaments also is not the major step of polymerization facilitated by membranes since membranes stripped of all peripheral components, including actin, increase the rate of actin assembly to about the same extent as do membranes containing small amounts of endogenous actin. Acceleration of the nucleation step by membranes also is supported by an analysis of the dependence of polymerization lag time on actin concentration. The barbed ends of membrane-induced actin nuclei are not obstructed by the membranes because the barbed end blocking agent, cytochalasin D, reduces the rate of membrane-mediated actin nucleation. Similarly, the pointed ends of the nuclei are not blocked by membranes since the depolymerization rate of gelsolin-capped actin is unchanged in the presence of membranes. These results are consistent with previous observations of lateral interactions between membranes and actin filaments. These results also are consistent with two predictions from a model based on equilibrium binding studies; i.e., that plasma membranes should nucleate actin assembly and that membrane-bound actin nuclei should have both ends free (Schwartz, M. A., and E. J. Luna. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 107:201-209). Integral membrane proteins mediate the actin nucleation activity because activity is eliminated by heat denaturation, treatment with reducing agents, or proteolysis of membranes. Activity also is abolished by solubilization with octylglucoside but is reconstituted upon removal or dilution of the detergent. Ponticulin, the major actin-binding protein in plasma membranes, appears to be necessary for nucleation activity since activity is not reconstituted from detergent extracts depleted of ponticulin.

Actins↗

Beta actin and its mRNA are localized at the plasma membrane and the regions of moving cytoplasm during the cellular response to injury.

Previous work in our laboratory has shown that microvascular pericytes sort muscle and nonmuscle actin isoforms into discrete cytoplasmic domains (Herman, I. M., and P. A. D'Amore. 1985. J. Cell Biol. 101:43-52; DeNofrio, D.T.C. Hoock, and I. M. Herman. J. Cell. Biol. 109:191-202). Specifically, muscle (alpha-smooth) actin is present on the stress fibers while nonmuscle actins (beta and gamma) are located on stress fibers and in regions of moving cytoplasm (e.g., ruffles, lamellae). To determine the form and function of beta actin in microvascular pericytes and endothelial cells recovering from injury, we prepared isoform-specific antibodies and cDNA probes for immunolocalization, Western and Northern blotting, as well as in situ hybridization. Anti-beta actin IgG was prepared by adsorption and release of beta actin-specific IgG from electrophoretically purified pericyte beta actin bound to nitrocellulose paper. Anti-beta actin IgGs prepared by this affinity selection procedure showed exclusive binding to beta actin present in crude cell lysates containing all three actin isoforms. For controls, we localized beta actin as a bright rim of staining beneath the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Anti-beta actin IgG, absorbed with beta actin bound to nitrocellulose, failed to stain erythrocytes. Simultaneous localization of beta actin with the entire F-actin pool was performed on microvascular pericytes or endothelial cells and 3T3 fibroblasts recovering from injury using anti-beta actin IgG in combination with fluorescent phalloidin. Results of these experiments revealed that pericyte beta actin is localized beneath the plasma membrane in association with filopods, pseudopods, and fan lamellae. Additionally, we observed bright focal fluorescence within fan lamellae and in association with the ends of stress fibers that are preferentially associated with the ventral plasmalemma. Whereas fluorescent phalloidin staining along the stress fibers is continuous, anti-beta actin IgG localization is discontinuous. When injured endothelial and 3T3 cells were stained through wound closure, we localized beta actin only in motile cytoplasm at the wound edge. Staining disappeared as cells became quiescent upon monolayer restoration. Appearance of beta actin at the wound edge correlated with a two- to threefold increase in steady-state levels of beta actin mRNA, which rose within 15-60 min after injury and returned to noninjury levels during monolayer restoration. In situ hybridization revealed that transcripts encoding beta actin were localized at the wound edge in association with the repositioned protein. Results of these experiments indicate that beta actin and its encoded mRNA are polarized at the membrane-cytoskeletal interface within regions of moving cytoplasm.

Actins↗

Maleimidobenzoyl actin: its biochemical properties and in vitro motility.

Muscle G-actin treated with the hetero-bifunctional cross-linking reagent m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS), denoted as MBS-G-actin, is not induced to polymerize into F-actin by salt and myosin subfragment 1 [Bettache, N., Bertrand, R., and Kassab, R. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6028-6032]. However, the addition of salt and phalloidin together allowed MBS-G-actin to polymerize and the resulting polymer (P-MBS-G-actin) could activate the Mg2+ -ATPase of S-1 [Miki, M. and Hozumi, T. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 5625-5630]. When F-actin was treated with MBS (MBS-F-actin), unlike MBS-G-actin, intercross-links between monomers in F-actin occurred. The MBS-F-actin could activate the Mg2+ -ATPase of heavy meromyosin (HMM): its maximum turnover rate, Vmax, was almost the same as that of native F-actin, but the affinity of HMM for MBS-F-actin in the presence of ATP, Km, was about 3 times higher. Electron microscopy showed that both P-MBS-G-actin and MBS-F-actin had the double stranded structures of F-actin and formed the arrowhead structures when combined with HMM. By in vitro motility assay, the sliding velocities of P-MBS-G-actin and MBS-F-actin were found to be slightly slower than that of native F-actin. But the critical concentration of KCl, over which the sliding movement was not observed, for MBS-modified actins was considerably higher than for native F-actin. When MBS-modified actins were regulated by tropomyosin-troponin complex, they were less sensitive to the Ca2+ concentration for HMM ATPase activation and sliding movement. These results showed that the modification of some of the lysine residues in the actin molecule leads to change in the biochemical properties of F-actin.

Actins↗

alpha-skeletal and alpha-cardiac actin genes are coexpressed in adult human skeletal muscle and heart.

We determined the actin isotypes encoded by 30 actin cDNA clones previously isolated from an adult human muscle cDNA library. Using 3' untranslated region probes derived from alpha-skeletal, beta- and gamma-actin cDNAs and from an alpha-cardiac actin genomic clone, we showed that 28 of the cDNAs correspond to alpha-skeletal actin transcripts. Unexpectedly, however, the remaining two cDNA clones proved to derive from alpha-cardiac actin mRNA. Sequence analysis confirmed that the two skeletal muscle alpha-cardiac actin cDNAs are derived from transcripts of the cloned alpha-cardiac actin gene. Direct measurements of actin isotype mRNA expression in human skeletal muscle showed that alpha-cardiac actin mRNA is expressed at 5% the level of alpha-skeletal actin. Furthermore, the alpha-cardiac actin gene expressed in skeletal muscle is the same gene which produces alpha-cardiac actin mRNA in the human heart. Of equal surprise, we found that alpha-skeletal actin mRNA accounts for about half of the total actin mRNA in adult heart. Comparison of total actin mRNA levels in adult skeletal muscle and adult heart revealed that the steady-state levels in skeletal muscle are about twofold greater, per microgram of total cellular RNA, than those in heart. Thus, in skeletal muscle and in heart, both of the sarcomeric actin mRNA isotypes are quite abundant transcripts. We conclude that alpha-skeletal and alpha-cardiac actin genes are coexpressed as an actin pair in human adult striated muscles. Since the smooth-muscle actins (aortic and stomach) and the cytoplasmic actins (beta and gamma) are known to be coexpressed in smooth muscle and nonmuscle cells, respectively, we postulate that coexpression of actin pairs may be a common feature of mammalian actin gene expression in all tissues.

Actins↗

Interaction of nonpolymerizable actins with myosin.

Polymerization of G-actin in the presence of salt and phalloidin was blocked by treatment of G-actin with m-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS) (designated as m-actin). The actin dimer produced by chemical crosslinking of F-actin with N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide did not polymerize and was still dimeric or tetrameric after further treatment with MBS (designated as d-actin). The m- and d-actins retained the ability to bind to myosin heads with apparent dissociation constants of 3-8 x 10(-6) and 3-5 x 10(-7) M, respectively. d-Actin formed a 1:1 actin monomer-myosin head complex. However, m-actin formed a 2:1 m-actin-head complex, suggesting the presence of at least two latent actin-binding sites on a myosin head. ATP weakens only 2- to 6-fold the binding of these complexes. One of two m-actins on a myosin head was replaced by d-actin. Native F-actin blocked the binding of both m- and d-actins to myosin heads in the presence and absence of ATP, although the affinities of myosin head for MBS-treated actins and F-actin are similar in the presence of ATP. These results suggest that there are at least three actin binding sites on a myosin head: one is responsible for binding of F-, m-, and d-actins, the second for binding of F- and m-actins, and the third for binding of F-actin at least in the presence of ATP. F-Actin binding to the third site may in some way block the first and second binding sites.

Actins↗

Microfilament dynamics during cell movement and chemotaxis monitored using a GFP-actin fusion protein.

BACKGROUND: The microfilament system in the cortex of highly motile cells, such as neutrophils and cells of the eukaryotic microorganism Dictyostelium discoideum, is subject to rapid re-organization, both spontaneously and in response to external signals. In particular, actin polymerization induced by a gradient of chemoattractant leads to local accumulation of filamentous actin and protrusion of a 'leading edge' of the cell in the direction of the gradient. In order to study the dynamics of actin in these processes, actin was tagged at its amino terminus with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and observed with fluorescence microscopy in living cells of D. discoideum. RESULTS: Purified GFP-actin was capable of copolymerizing with actin. In the transfected cells of D. discoideum studied, GFP-actin made up 10-20% of the total actin. Microfilaments containing GFP-actin were capable of generating force with myosin in an in vitro assay. Observations of single living cells using fluorescence microscopy showed that the fusion protein was enriched in cell projections, including filopodia and leading edges, and that the fusion protein reflected the dynamics of the microfilament system in cells that were freely moving, being chemotactically stimulated, or aggregated. When confocal sections of fixed cells containing GFP-actin were labeled with fluorescent phalloidin, which binds only to filamentous actin, there was a correlation between the areas of GFP-actin and phalloidin fluorescence, but there were distinct sites in which GFP-actin was more prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Double labeling with GFP-actin and other probes provides an indication of the various states of actin in motile cells. A major portion of the actin assemblies visualized using GFP-actin are networks or bundles of filamentous actin. Other clusters of GFP-actin might represent stores of monomeric actin in the form of complexes with actin-sequestering proteins.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Biochemical characterisation of the actin-binding properties of utrophin.

Utrophin is a large ubiquitously expressed cytoskeletal protein that is important for maturation of vertebrate neuromuscular junctions. It is highly homologous to dystrophin, the protein defective in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Utrophin binds to the actin cytoskeleton via an N-terminal actin-binding domain, which is related to the actin-binding domains of members of the spectrin superfamily of proteins. We have determined the actin-binding properties of this utrophin domain and investigated its binding site on F-actin. An F-actin cosedimentation assay confirmed that the domain binds more tightly to beta-F-actin than to alpha-F-actin and that the full-length utrophin domain binds more tightly to both actin isoforms than a truncated construct, lacking a characteristic utrophin N-terminal extension. Both domain constructs exist in solution as compact monomers and bind to actin as 1:1 complexes. Analysis of the products of partial proteolysis of the domain in the presence of F-actin showed that the N-terminal extension was protected by binding to actin. The actin isoform dependence of utrophin binding could reflect differences at the N-termini of the actin isoforms, thus localising the utrophin-binding site on actin. The involvement of the actin N-terminus in utrophin binding was also supported by competition binding assays using myosin subfragment S1, which also binds F-actin near its N-terminus. Cross-linking studies suggested that utrophin contacts two actin monomers in the actin filament as does myosin S1. These biochemical approaches complement our structural studies and facilitate characterisation of the actin-binding properties of the utrophin actin-binding domain.

Actins↗