Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,135 records · Page 63Linked to original sources

Silencer-mediated repression and non-mediated activation of BDNF and c-fos gene promoters in primary glial or neuronal cells.

Although the neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE/Regard) has been shown to function as a negative-acting DNA regulatory element to prevent the expression of neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells, little is known about its silencing effect on transcription in primary glial cells nor its effect on transcriptional activation in primary neurons. By DNA transfection in primary cultures of rat cortical neuronal or glial cells, we investigated the effect of NRSE on transcription mediated by the BDNF promoter I or c-fos promoter to which NRSE sequences derived from the SCG10 gene were linked. Transfection of plasmid DNAs to NIH3T3 fibroblasts resulted in a marked repressive effect of NRSE on BDNF promoter I- or c-fos promoter-mediated transcription. In primary neuronal cells, however, NRSE did not repress the basal promoter activities of BDNF and c-fos genes and allowed the transcriptional activation of these genes induced by membrane depolarization although NRSE slightly reduced the magnitude of BDNF promoter I activation. In contrast to neuronal cells, a marked repression of basal promoter activities of both genes was detected in primary glial culture and a two base pair-mutation of NRSE partially recovered the repression. These results indicate that NRSE negatively acts on its linked promoters in primary glial cells and does not interfere an activation of linked promoters in neuronal cells.

3T3 Cells↗

Transcriptional repression of p21((Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1)) gene by c-jun through Sp1 site.

Previously, we found that c-jun represses the tumor suppressor p21((Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1)) (p21) gene expression. In this study, we further investigated the mechanism of the inhibitory effect of c-jun on p21. After analysis of a series of deletion and point mutants of p21 promoter, we found that Sp1-3 site (-77 and -83) relative to the transcription start site played an important role for c-jun-repressing-responsive element in the p21 promoter. Both Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors were the key factors for this event. However, the data from electrophoretic mobility shift assay indicated that c-jun did not change the Sp1 DNA-binding affinity, suggesting that additional factors may be involved in the repression of p21 by c-jun. Furthermore, c-jun could inhibit butyrate-inducing p21 gene expression through Sp1, indicating at least one common pathway whereby p21 expression is affected by c-jun and butyrate in opposing actions. Moreover, the hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (Rb) increased in c-jun expressing cells, indicating that phosphorylated Rb may play a role in regulating Sp1 to repress p21 expression. This is the first demonstration of how housekeeping factors and oncogene product counteract the function of tumor suppressor genes to control cell cycle progression.

Binding Sites↗

Separate elements in the 3' untranslated region of the mouse protamine 1 mRNA regulate translational repression and activation during murine spermatogenesis.

The mouse protamine mRNAs, Prm-1 and Prm-2, are translationally repressed for several days during male germ cell differentiation. The translational delay of mouse Prm-1 mRNA has previously been shown to be dependent upon cis-acting elements that reside in the last 62 nucleotides of the Prm-1 3' untranslated region (3' UTR). We have previously identified a 48/50-kDa protein that binds the 3' UTRs of both Prm-1 and Prm-2 mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner, is present in cytoplasmic fractions of postmeiotic round spermatids where the protamine mRNAs are translationally silent, and is markedly reduced in elongated spermatids where the protamine mRNAs become activated for translation. Surprisingly, the binding site for this activity maps to a region of the Prm-1 3' UTR not contained within the functional 62 nucleotides described above. In this report we show that the binding site for the 48/50-kDa protein can also delay translation of a reporter RNA in vivo, suggesting that the 48/50-kDa protein can repress the translation of Prm-1 mRNA during murine spermatogenesis. This observation proves that two separate regions of the Prm-1 3' UTR are sufficient to repress Prm-1 translation. In addition, immunocytochemistry and polysome analysis have revealed that this transgenic reporter mRNA fails to undergo proper translational activation. These results suggest that an additional region of the Prm-1 3' UTR is required for proper translational activation and that Prm-1 translational repression elements can be separated from those involved in translational activation.

Animals↗

Two genetic circuits repress the Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-28 after translation initiation.

The heterochronic gene lin-28 of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans controls the relative timing of diverse developmental events during the animal's larval stages. lin-28 is stage-specifically regulated by two genetic circuits: negatively by the 22-nt RNA lin-4 and positively by the heterochronic gene lin-14. Here, we show that lin-28 is repressed during normal development by a mechanism that acts on its mRNA after translation initiation. We provide evidence that lin-14 inhibits a negative regulation that is independent of the lin-4 RNA and involves the gene daf-12, which encodes a nuclear hormone receptor. The lin-4-independent repression does not affect the initiation of translation on the lin-28 mRNA, and like the lin-4-mediated repression, acts through the gene's 3'-untranslated region. In addition, we find that lin-4 is not sufficient to cause repression of lin-28 if the lin-4-independent circuit is inhibited. Therefore, the lin-4-independent circuit likely contributes substantially to the down-regulation of lin-28 that occurs during normal development. The role of lin-4 may be to initiate or potentiate the lin-4-independent circuit. We speculate that a parallel lin-4-independent regulatory mechanism regulates the expression of lin-14.

Animals↗

Repression of transcription and interference with DNA binding of TATA-binding protein by C-terminal alternatively spliced p53.

The protein encoded by C-terminal alternatively spliced p53 mRNA (p53as) has been shown previously to occur naturally in mouse cells and to bind sequence-specifically to DNA more efficiently than p53 (p53r, regular form). In the current study, p53as and p53r proteins ectopically expressed in p53-deficient cells each transactivated reporter plasmids containing p53 binding sites. However, p53as consistently was more efficient in transcriptional repression of promoters lacking p53 binding sites and in concentration-dependent repression of the p21(WAF1/Cip-l/Sdi) promoter sequence. The p53as protein, like p53r, associated with TATA-binding protein (TBP), indicating that this interaction does not require the last 26 amino acids of p53. Consistent with its stronger repression effects, p53as interfered with TBP binding to a TATA-containing DNA sequence more efficiently than p53r protein. Taken together, these in vitro and in vivo results demonstrate a novel role in transcriptional repression for a naturally occurring C-terminal variant form of mouse p53 protein associated with differences in DNA binding properties and interference with transcription factor binding.

Alternative Splicing↗

Hypoxic repression of lactate dehydrogenase-B in retina.

In order to elucidate mechanisms controlling hypoxia induced gene repression in the retina, we studied expression of the lactate dehydrogenase gene LDH-B. RT/PCR was used to isolate cDNA fragments of the LDH-A and LDH-B genes from both rat and chick. Northern analysis was used to measure LDH-B mRNA expression and in situ hybridization to localize LDH-B mRNA during development of the avascular chick retina. Primary retinal cultures of rat and chick were subjected to hypoxia and reperfusion paradigms, and levels of LDH-A and LDH-B mRNA expression were measured by Northern and semi-quantitative RT/PCR analyses. Northern analysis demonstrated that LDH-B mRNA is developmentally regulated in the chick retina according to a time course that correlates with oxygen availability. In developing chick retina in situ hybridization localized LDH-B mRNA to aerobic regions of the retina, coincident with the distribution of active mitochondria. Northern and semi-quantitative RT/PCR analyses demonstrated that LDH-B mRNA levels decrease in primary rat and chick retinal cells in response to hypoxia. LDH-B mRNA increased to control levels in retinal cells exposed to hypoxia then reperfused with oxygen, while the opposite was true for LDH-A, an hypoxia inducible gene. These data demonstrate that LDH-B gene repression after hypoxia and reactivation after oxygen reperfusion occurs in both vascular and avascular retinal cells. Oxygen regulated expression of LDH-B is opposite and complementary to that of LDH-A and provides a system to elucidate the mechanisms underlying hypoxic gene repression and reactivation after reperfusion. Mechanisms controlling gene repression and reactivation based on oxygen availability are likely to be critically involved in ischemic damage and neovascular retinopathy.

Animals↗

Null alleles of creA, the regulator of carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans.

CreA is the major regulatory protein involved in carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Previously we have reported the molecular characterization of a number of in vivo selected mutant alleles and showed that they were unlikely to represent total loss of function alleles (Shroff et al., 1996) and that a deletion of the creA gene and surrounding DNA has an extremely severe effect on morphology under both carbon catabolite repressing and carbon catabolite nonrepressing conditions (Dowzer and Kelly, 1991). Here we present an analysis of in vivo selected creA mutations with an extreme morphological phenotype and show that some of these alleles would be predicted to result in no functional CreA. The most extreme of these alleles resulted in a truncation of the protein within the first zinc finger. Precise gene disruptions, leaving the flanking sequences intact, show essentially the same phenotype as this truncated allele. Thus, a strain containing a null allele is viable, and the leaky-lethal phenotype of previous deletion alleles (Dowzer and Kelly, 1991) must be due to the deletion of additional 3' genomic sequence. A strain containing an allele that results in a deletion of the final 80 amino acids shows reduced sensitivity to carbon catabolite repression for a number of systems, thus localizing a region of the protein involved in repression. Surprisingly, the phenotypically most extreme allele studied is not a null allele, but results in an amino acid substitution that would disrupt the zinc finger region and abolish binding to DNA. This is the only allele that produces a full-length protein, predicted to be nuclear localized, but which completely abolishes DNA binding. The phenotype may be more extreme than the null alleles due to the nuclear located CreA protein titrating interacting proteins.

Alleles↗

The alpha-fetoprotein promoter is the target of Afr1-mediated postnatal repression.

The alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene is transcribed at high levels in the fetal liver and is repressed at birth, leading to low but detectable levels of AFP mRNA in the adult liver. This repression is regulated, in part, by a locus that is unlinked to AFP called Alpha-fetoprotein regulator 1 (Afr1). Previous studies showed that Afr1 regulation is independent of the AFP enhancers but requires the 1-kb AFP promoter/repressor region. Here, we demonstrate that a transgene with the 250-bp AFP promoter region linked to AFP enhancer element EII is expressed in the fetal liver and is postnatally repressed. In addition, this transgene is regulated by Afr1. These data indicate that the promoter is involved in postnatal AFP repression. Furthermore, we provide a high-resolution map of the Afr1 locus on mouse chromosome 15.

Animals↗

The mechanism of retinoic acid radiosensitization is independent of AP-1 repression in a cervical carcinoma cell line.

INTRODUCTION: Retinoic acid (RA) has been shown to radiosensitize some tumor cell lines. RA regulates gene expression through nuclear receptors that bind to retinoic acid response elements in gene promoters and that inhibit activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor activity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the mechanism of radiosensitization of the CC-1 human cervical carcinoma cell line by 9-cis-RA (9cRA) involves repression of AP-1 activity. METHODS: The CCA reporter cell line was established from CC-1 by permanent transfection with the ColCAT reporter plasmid which consists of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene under the control of the AP-1-responsive collagenase gene promoter. CCA cultures were treated with various combinations of 9cRA, 60Co radiation, and an AP-1 inducer called O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA). Cultures were then evaluated in parallel for CAT expression as a measure of AP-1 activity and for clonogenic survival as a measure of radiosensitization. RESULTS: The CCA reporter line exhibited a radiation dose-responsive induction of AP-1 activity that was decreased by 5 microM 9cRA and increased by 50 ng/ml TPA. Simultaneous treatment with TPA and 9cRA prevented 9cRA repression of AP-1 and resulted in AP-1 activity above basal level. The 9cRA radiosensitized CC-1 cultures with a dose modification factor of 1.5. The survival of cultures treated simultaneously with TPA and 9cRA was statistically identical to that of cultures treated with 9cRA alone. CONCLUSION: Although TPA prevented AP-1 repression by 9cRA, it did not prevent radiosensitization in CCA cultures, therefore the mechanism of radiosensitization of CCA by 9cRA is independent of AP-1 repression.

Alitretinoin↗

Design of CytR regulated, cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoters in Escherichia coli: RNA polymerase-promoter interactions modulate the efficiency of CytR repression.

In CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli, the cAMP-CRP complex acts as a transcriptional activator as well as a co-repressor for the CytR protein. Repression by CytR depends on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes in which CytR binds cooperatively to the DNA with one or two cAMP-CRP complexes. Here, we demonstrate that in order to establish CytR regulation in a cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoter with a single CRP site (CRP site centred around position -40.5) in which the CytR operator is located upstream of the CRP site, high affinity binding sites for both regulators are required. The efficiency of CytR regulation was observed to be modulated by RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter interactions. Specifically, in class II promoters with a single CRP site, the efficiency of CytR regulation was found to correlate inversely with cAMP-CRP independent promoter activity. These observations can be reconciled in a competition model for CytR regulation in which CytR and RNAP compete for cooperative binding with cAMP-CRP to the promoters in vivo. In this model, two mutually exclusive ternary complexes can be formed: a CytR/cAMP-CRP/promoter repression complex and an RNAP/cAMP-CRP/promoter activation complex. Thus, CytR regulation critically depends on formation of a repression complex that binds the promoter with sufficiently high affinity to exclude formation of the competing activation complex. We suggest that the transition from repression to activation involves a switch in the protein-protein interactions made by cAMP-CRP from CytR to RNAP. On the basis of the regulatory features of the promoters analysed here, we speculate about the advantages offered by the structural complexity of natural CytR/cAMP-CRP regulated promoters.

Base Sequence↗

The F plasmid centromere, sopC, is required for full repression of the sopAB operon.

The SopB protein of the F plasmid has a dual role in the partition of F plasmid copies to daughter cells prior to division. It binds to the sopC centromere site to form the partition complex needed for stabilizing the plasmid, and it interacts with SopA to repress transcription of the sopAB operon, thus preventing the destabilization that results from excess SopB. We have isolated sop mutants by screening for unstable inheritance of mutagenized mini-F DNA. Four of the mutants resulted from different missense mutations in sopB. All four were deficient, to varying degrees, in autoregulation of Sop protein synthesis. The mutant proteins showed diminished capacity for reducing the linking number of mini-F and for destabilizing a plasmid carrying sopC, indicating that reduced ability to form a normal complex with sopC might underlie the autoregulation defect. Repression of the transcription of a sop promoter- lacZ fusion by SopA and SopB was strongly enhanced in the presence of sopC, in cis or in trans, and the enhancement was reduced or nullified when wild-type sopB was replaced by the mutant sopB alleles. A single 43 bp unit of sopC was almost as effective as sopC itself in enhancing repression. The results show that sopC is necessary for full repression of the sop promoter. They thus indicate a previously unsuspected role for this centromere site, and suggest that autoregulation and partition might normally be coordinated processes.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Repression of transcription by HoxC11 upon phorbol ester stimulation.

Hox genes encode transcription factors with a conserved DNA-binding domain and exhibit similar DNA-binding preferences. The in vivo specificity required for their biological function is brought about by combinatorial interactions with other factors. Such interactions also modulate their activation state. Here we show that HoxC11 can either activate or repress transcription in a signal-specific manner. We report the isolation of HoxC11 in a yeast one-hybrid screen for factors binding to a phorbol-ester, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) response element (VLTRE), which is also a target for TPA-induced binding of Rel factors in gel-shift experiments. Although we detect no binding of in vitro translated HoxC11 to the TPA response element in EMSA, overexpression of HoxC11 in the HepG2 cell line leads to a complete block of TPA-induced transcription from a VLTRE-luciferase reporter. There is, however, no repression of the basal levels. The repression is furthermore not dependent on homeo-domain DNA binding. Our data suggest an interaction of HoxC11 with the basal-transcription machinery. We propose that HoxC11 is capable of mediating transcriptional activation or repression in a signal-specific manner and that its activation of the DNA target sequence in yeast might reflect in vivo recruitment to the promoter complex.

DNA↗

Correlation of farnesoid X receptor coactivator recruitment and cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene repression by bile acids.

Cholesterol conversion to bile acids in the liver is regulated by the rate-limiting enzyme cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A1). CYP7A1 activity is regulated by feedback repression by bile acids at the transcriptional level. The farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, was recently demonstrated to function as the bile acid receptor and its high level of expression in the liver implicates it in the transcriptional regulation of CYP7A1. This study compares the potencies of various bile acids in their ability to mediate recruitment of the transcriptional coactivator protein, steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), to the FXR ligand binding domain with their ability to repress CYP7A1 expression in HepG2 cells. A mammalian two-hybrid assay was utilized to assess the ability of FXR to recruit SRC-1 in a ligand-dependent manner. Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was the most potent and efficacious compound in the SRC-1 recruitment assay (EC(50) = 11.7 microM) followed by deoxycholic acid (DCA; EC(50) = 19.0 microM). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) displayed minimal activity while cholic acid (CA) was inactive. In order to directly compare the potencies of the bile acids in the coactivator recruitment assay to their ability to repress CYP7A1 expression, a branched DNA assay was developed to rapidly measure CYP7A1 mRNA levels from HepG2 cells cultured in 96-well plates. The rank order and absolute potency was conserved (CDCA IC(50) = 8.7 microM, DCA IC(50) = 27.2 microM, UDCA and CA inactive) consistent with bile acid repression of CYP7A1 being mediated by FXR.

Base Sequence↗

Repression of GAD autoantigen expression in pancreas beta-Cells by delivery of antisense plasmid/PEG-g-PLL complex.

It was previously reported that silencing of the expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in transgenic nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice completely protected islet beta-cells against development of diabetes. This suggests that the repression of GAD autoantigen by somatic gene delivery can prevent autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta-cells. To repress GAD expression in islet beta-cells, we delivered an antisense GAD mRNA expression plasmid (pRIP-AS-GAD) using poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted poly-L-lysine (PEG-g-PLL) as a gene carrier. In a gel retardation assay, the pRIP-AS-GAD/PEG-g-PLL complex was completely retarded above a weight ratio of 1:1.5 (plasmid: PEG-g-PLL). PEG-g-PLL protected the plasmid DNA from DNase I for more than 60 minutes. In a reporter gene transfection assay, PEG-g-PLL showed the highest transfection efficiency at a weight ratio of 1:3. We also transfected pRIP-AS-GAD/PEG-g-PLL complex into a GAD-producing mouse insulinoma (MIN6) cell line. The antisense mRNA was expressed specifically in beta-cells and expression was dependent on glucose level. The repression of GAD after transfection of pRIP-AS-GAD was confirmed by immunoblot assay. In addition, in vivo expression of antisense RNA in pancreas was confirmed by RT-PCR after intravenous injection of the complex into mice. Therefore, our study revealed that the pRIP-AS-GAD/PEG-g-PLL system is applicable for the repression of GAD autoantigen expression.

Animals↗

E1A oncogene of adenovirus-12 mediates trans-repression of MHC class I transcription in Ad5/Ad12 somatic hybrid transformed cells.

Reduction of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I antigens on the surface of adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) transformed cells is thought to contribute to their tumorigenic potential. The E1A gene of Ad12 mediates this effect by repressing the MHC class I transcriptional enhancer. By contrast, Ad5-transformed cells are not blocked in class I gene expression and are nontumorigenic. Because E1A proteins modulate transcription by interacting with several different cellular factors, we inquired whether the Ad5 E1A proteins could interfere with the ability of Ad12 E1A proteins to repress class I transcription. Somatic cell hybrids, produced by fusing Ad5- and Ad12-transformed cells, expressed E1A proteins of both virus serotypes. The level of class I expression and transcription in the 5/12 hybrid cell lines was reduced to the same degree as in the original Ad12-transformed cells. Also observed in the 5/12 hybrid cell lines was strong binding activity to the R2 subelement of the H-2 class I enhancer which, in Ad12-transformed cells, correlates with repression of class I transcription. These results demonstrate that Ad12 E1A proteins mediate repression of the class I enhancer through a mechanism that is unaffected by Ad5 E1A proteins.

Adenoviridae↗

Hepatitis B virus X gene expression is activated by X protein but repressed by p53 tumor suppressor gene product in the transient expression system.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) X gene is known to exhibit a transcriptional activation function and is considered to play a major role in hepatocarcinogenesis. We determined a 20-bp promoter element for the HBV X gene transcription and found a binding protein to this promoter element, designated as an X-PBP. We then examined the effects of HBV X protein and p53 tumor suppressor gene product on X gene transcription from the 20-bp promoter element using the transient expression technique. Activity of the X gene promoter was stimulated by X protein expression, but, in contrast, was repressed by transfected normal p53 gene. On the other hand, mutant p53 gene product exhibited no repression. Moreover, the p53 repression of X gene transcription was canceled by X protein coexpression. Thus, the effects of X protein and normal p53 product appear to be mutually antagonistic in the regulation of X gene expression. However, mutated promoter elements which failed to bind to X-PBP still responded to X protein or p53, indicating that the process of X transactivation or p53 repression may be independent of X-PBP binding to the promoter element. Our data suggest that X protein could disrupt function of normal p53 protein in X gene-transfected cells.

Base Sequence↗

Alleviation of murine leukemia virus repression in embryonic carcinoma cells by genetically engineered primer binding sites and artificial tRNA primers.

The primer binding site (PBS) plays pivotal roles during reverse transcription of retroviruses and also is the target of a cellular host defense impeding the transcription of murine leukemia virus (MLV) harboring a proline (pro) PBS in embryonic cells. Both the PBS and the tRNA primer are copied during reverse transcription and anneal as complementary DNA sequences creating the PBS of the integrated provirus. The pro PBS of MLV can be exchanged by PBS sequences matching endogenous or engineered tRNAs to allow replication of Akv MLV-derived vectors in fibroblasts. Here we use the PBS escape mutant B2 to demonstrate the capacity of the synthetic tRNA(B2) to function in reverse transcription in competition with endogenous tRNAs in fibroblasts and embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells. We further show symmetry between PBS and the primer by the ability of the synthetic tRNA(B2) to confer escape from EC repression of a PBS-Pro vector. Of a panel of vectors with the repressed pro PBS substituted for other natural or artificial PBS sequences, all except one efficiently expressed the neo marker gene when transferred to NIH/3T3 and EC cells, hence avoiding PBS-mediated silencing in EC cells. A non-natural PBS matching an artificially designed tRNA molecule conferred no further relief from repression than that attained with the B2 escape mutant or the natural alternative PBSs. Interestingly, a vector harboring a PBS matching tRNA(Lys1.2) suffered repression similar to the wild-type PBS-Pro but was partially rescued by a single point mutation of the PBS.

3T3 Cells↗

A new cellular factor recognizes E2 binding sites of papillomaviruses which mediate transcriptional repression by E2.

Repression of transcription by the full-length E2 protein of papillomaviruses (PV) seems to occur when the E2 binding sites and those of positively acting cellular factors overlap. Previously, we showed that RUNX1 (formerly called CBF) binds to the repression-mediating E2 binding site P2 of human PV type 8 (HPV8). By a yeast one-hybrid system we could identify an unknown protein binding also to P2, tentatively called PBF (papillomavirus binding factor). PBF recognizes the sequence CCGG, which represents the 3' half of the E2 binding site just adjacent to the RUNX1 motif. PBF also binds to the repression-mediating E2 BS-1 in BPV1, which is conserved to P2 of HPV8. Point mutations destroying PBF binding to HPV8 P2 and BPV-1 E2 BS-1 in vitro reduce promoter activity in corresponding reporter constructs. Our results suggest that PBF might play a role in transcription of PV genes and in E2-mediated repression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗