Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MAMMOGRAPHY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,135 records · Page 63Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Objective data and anecdotal reports have suggested that access to mammography may be declining because of facility closures and difficulty in recruiting and retaining radiologists and radiologic technologists. To gain insight into the practice patterns, use of emerging technologies, and concerns of breast imagers in current practice, the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) conducted a national survey of breast imaging practices in the U.S. METHODS: Between October 2003 and April 2004, the SBI conducted a survey of the SBI membership database, and received completed surveys from 575 breast imaging practices in the U.S. Responses to the survey regarding practice characteristics, the utilization of standard and emerging technologies, staffing, malpractice, finance, and morale were analyzed. RESULTS: Job vacancies for radiologists who read mammograms were reported in 163 practices (29%), 59 of which (10%) had 2 or more openings. A higher proportion of practices with job openings had long appointment waiting times for asymptomatic women when compared with fully staffed practices. Unfilled fellowship positions also were common, with 41 of 65 practices that offer fellowships reporting 47 openings. Among 554 responding practices, 55% reported that someone in their practice was sued because of a mammography related case within the past 5 years, and 50% of practices reported that the threat of lawsuits made radiologist staffing "moderately" or "a lot" more difficult. Of 521 responding practices, 35% reported financial losses in 2002. One in 5 respondents reported that they would prefer to spend less time in mammography, and fewer than 1 in 3 would recommend a breast imaging fellowship to a relative or friend. Emerging technologies, such as breast magnetic resonance imaging and screening ultrasound, currently are being performed in many practices. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results provide support for anecdotal reports that breast imaging practices face significant challenges and stresses, including shortages of key personnel, a lack of trainees, malpractice concerns, financial constraints, increased workload due to emerging technologies, low appeal of breast imaging as a career specialty, and the steady rise in the population of women of screening age.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, a comprehensive analysis of pathology outcomes after screening mammography, as it is practiced clinically in the U.S. general population, has not been performed. METHODS: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data from 1996-2001 were used to identify pathology specimens that were obtained within 1 year of screening mammograms performed on 786,846 women ages 40-89 years. The pathology results were classified as invasive carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or benign. The associations between overall pathology outcomes and invasive tumor size and lymph node status were analyzed by age and mammography assessment category. RESULTS: The rates of both recommending and performing a biopsy varied little with age. The 1,664,032 screening mammograms were followed by 26,748 known biopsies (1.6%) and 8815 diagnoses of breast carcinoma (0.53%). Overall, 81% of carcinomas were invasive, and 78% of those were pathologically lymph node-negative tumors, in contrast to the 66% prevalence observed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data during the same period. Most invasive tumors measured between 0 mm and 10 mm (35%) or between 11 mm and 20 mm (36%) in greatest dimension, and 92% and 78% were lymph node-negative tumors, respectively: Biopsy results that were classified as malignant increased with age (P < 0.0001) and were most likely to follow Breast Imaging, Reporting, and Diagnosis System Category 5 and 4 assessments, respectively. Ductal hyperplasia (19.6%), fibroadenoma (18.5%), and other benign findings (56.1%) were the most common benign diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologically negative lymph nodes were more prevalent in this mammographically screened population than in the overall SEER population. The prevalence of invasive carcinoma, DCIS, and benign findings presented herein establish a range of expected biopsy outcomes for women after screening mammography in the general U.S. population.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Mammography quality assurance programs.

A quality assurance program is an integral part of a department of radiology, but certain examinations require a more specialized approach than others. The need for greater quality control in mammography was recognized by the American College of Radiology in 1987. The voluntary program developed by this organization has greatly improved the overall quality of mammography in almost three fourths of the facilities in this country. The principles of this initiative now have been adopted by various state and federal agencies, but a uniform approach has not yet been finalized. Optimally, the best aspects of all of these programs will be integrated, resulting in satisfactory image quality, acceptable dosimetry, and an appropriate level of interpretive accuracy in all mammography installations.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1994

The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan.

This paper describes the history of mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan, the first of its kind in the nation. It discusses the collaboration of multiple organizations in the legislative process as well as in the implementation of it. It describes the effect of the legislation on the quality of mammography throughout the state and summarizes the lessons learned from the process, especially as they apply to the implementation of the Mammography Quality Standards Act at the national level.

Female↗
PubMed1994

Relationship of age to mammography compliance.

Mammography use varies by age, with older women showing decreased use. The purpose of this research was to identify variables that affect screening use within two different age groups of women, those younger than 50 and those 50 and older. Predictor variables were identified using the Health Belief Model and Theory of Reasoned Action and included susceptibility, seriousness, benefits, barriers, health motivation, control, social influence, and experiential/demographic variables. A probability sample of 581 women aged 35 and older was included for analyses. Two measures of mammography compliance were tested: compliance with American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines for the 5 years before the study and compliance with the ACS guidelines for the year before the study. An in-home interview was conducted by graduate research assistants. Compliance rates were significantly lower for women 50 and older than they were for younger women for both the 5-year compliance and the single year of compliance. Barriers were more significant for older women. Having a mammography suggested by a health care professional was most important in the older group, indicating that less weight may be given to personal decision making by this population. Higher socioeconomic status was significant with older but not younger women. For older women, interventions need to be directed toward both the physician and the individual woman. Programs that provide knowledge and address cost issues may be the most important primary components for younger women.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: the Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992-1997.

The national breast cancer screening programme in Luxembourg, the Mammography Programme (MP), was launched in 1992. Its primary goal was to set up an organised breast cancer screening with biennial invitation-reinvitation of women 50-64 years, 2-view mammography, technical quality assurance, double-reading procedures and close monitoring of performance. In 1994, the decision was taken by health authorities to only reimburse screening mammograms done within the MP. We evaluated the performance of 3 screening rounds that took place in 1992-1997. In 1992, 4,815 women had opportunistic screening and 4,790 attended the MP. In 1997, 861 women had opportunistic screening and 8,603 attended the MP. In 1997, the participation rate in the MP reached 50%. The referral rate in the MP was 10% for initial screening and 5% for subsequent screening. Echographic examinations accounted for 71% of referrals. Per 1,000 screened women, biopsy and cancer rates were 18.0 and 8.0 for initial screening and 10.3 and 5.8 for subsequent screening. Twenty-one percent of the breast cancers diagnosed in screened women were interval cancers. The age-adjusted proportion of tumours >20 mm was 56.1% before 1992, 45.1% for women not (yet) screened by the MP, 27.0% for interval cancers, 26.6% for initial screening and 12.0% for subsequent screenings. Tumour size distribution was similar to that observed in the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 1990-1993, except that in the latter programme, no difference was observed between initial and subsequent screening. The Luxembourg experience shows that in a liberal health care system, a policy of organising the screening process by reimbursing only those mammograms done within the context of the organised screening programme can drastically reduce opportunistic screening. Further efforts in the Mammography Programme will aim at increasing participation and look at ways to decrease referrals to echography.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Increased incidence of invasive breast cancer after the introduction of service screening with mammography in Sweden.

Screening with mammography has been shown to substantially reduce mortality from breast cancer. The incidence of invasive cancer will increase as screening starts, and it is desirable that it gradually returns to the same level as before screening. Age-specific incidence of invasive breast cancer in 11 Swedish counties, including 463,000 women aged 40-74 years, was analysed before and after the start of service screening with mammography. Incidence, as observed on average during 12.8 years from screening start, was compared to expected incidence based on the incidence during a 15-year period preceding screening start. The height of the incidence peak during the first screening round was increasing with increasing age, compatible with the accumulation in the population of slowly growing tumours by age. All analysed age groups showed an increased ratio between observed stabilised incidence 7-14 years after screening start and expected incidence. When relative risks were adjusted for lead time, the estimates were 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-1.79) and 1.21 (95% CI 1.04-1.41) for the age groups 50-59 and 60-69 years, respectively. In the age groups 40-49 and 70-74, no change was observed. The findings were further confirmed by the observation of a disappearance in the screened population of the notch in the increasing trend of age-specific breast cancer incidence for the ages after menopause. This notch could indicate hormone-related retardation in tumour growth around menopause. It appears that many of these clinically insignificant, retarded tumours are detected with screening mammography.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.

Thirty-five women with a total of 39 breast lesions detected at mammography and/or physical examination and who were scheduled for surgical biopsy were studied with dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) mammography. Fat-suppressed, spoiled GRASS (gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state) sequences were performed before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. T1-weighted spin-echo and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were also obtained. By measuring percentage signal intensity change in lesions on the spoiled GRASS images after contrast agent injection, the authors achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 83.3% in differentiating benign from malignant lesions (24 benign, 15 malignant), with biopsy results as the standard. This dynamic MR mammography technique deserves further evaluation.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Enhanced detection of preinvasive breast cancer: combined role of mammography and needle localization biopsy.

Several recent reports have described an increase in the incidence of preinvasive carcinoma of the breast. To determine the incidence of preinvasive breast cancer at our institution, the results of 469 consecutive outpatient breast biopsies performed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center between July 1, 1985, and January 1, 1987, were reviewed. During this time period, 256 biopsies were performed on palpable masses, and 213 needle localization biopsies were performed on mammographically suspicious lesions. The overall incidence of cancer was 15.4%. Needle localization biopsies yielded a diagnosis of cancer in 17.8% of cases, as did 13.3% of biopsies performed on palpable masses. Eight of 38 (21.1%) carcinomas identified by mammography were preinvasive at the time of diagnosis. Only one of 34 (2.9%) cancers identified because of a breast mass was preinvasive. We conclude that screening mammography is an invaluable tool for the detection of preinvasive carcinoma of the breast and that the increased use of mammography will result in an increase in the incidence of detection of this lesion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography.

Screening mammography continues to play a key role in the early diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer. Approximately 5% of patients will have lesions on their mammograms that appear neither clearly benign nor malignant. The proper management of these patients is not well defined. In this study, the mammograms of 64 women who underwent breast biopsy were reviewed. After the initial review, the mammograms were reevaluated using a personal computer driven digital conversion and enhancement system. The majority of indeterminate lesions were assigned a determinate diagnosis by enhancing the areas of abnormality through enlargement, contrast adjustment, and brightness adjustment. The radiologists were able to maintain baseline sensitivity and specificity throughout this process. In contrast, enhancement of lesions initially assigned a diagnosis of characteristically benign or malignant demonstrated no advantage over plain film mammography. These findings suggest a role for the selective use of digital mammography and enhancement techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography.

When interpreting screening mammograms radiologists decide whether suspicious abnormalities exist that warrant the recall of the patient for further testing. Previous work has found significant differences in interpretation among radiologists; their false-positive and false-negative rates have been shown to vary widely. Performance assessments of individual radiologists have been mandated by the U.S. government, but concern exists about the adequacy of current assessment techniques. We use hierarchical modelling techniques to infer about interpretive performance of individual radiologists in screening mammography. While doing this we account for differences due to patient mix and radiologist attributes (for instance, years of experience or interpretive volume). We model at the mammogram level, and then use these models to assess radiologist performance. Our approach is demonstrated with data from mammography registries and radiologist surveys. For each mammogram, the registries record whether or not the woman was found to have breast cancer within one year of the mammogram; this criterion is used to determine whether the recall decision was correct. We model the false-positive rate and the false-negative rate separately using logistic regression on patient risk factors and radiologist random effects. The radiologist random effects are, in turn, regressed on radiologist attributes such as the number of years in practice. Using these Bayesian hierarchical models we examine several radiologist performance metrics. The first is the difference between the false-positive or false-negative rate of a particular radiologist and that of a hypothetical 'standard' radiologist with the same attributes and the same patient mix. A second metric predicts the performance of each radiologist on hypothetical mammography exams with particular combinations of patient risk factors (which we characterize as 'typical', 'high-risk', or 'low-risk'). The second metric can be used to compare one radiologist to another, while the first metric addresses how the radiologist is performing compared to an appropriate standard. Interval estimates are given for the metrics, thereby addressing uncertainty. The particular novelty in our contribution is to estimate multiple performance rates (sensitivity and specificity). One can even estimate a continuum of performance rates such as a performance curve or ROC curve using our models and we describe how this may be done. In addition to assessing radiologists in the original data set, we also show how to infer about the performance of a new radiologist with new case mix, new outcome data, and new attributes without having to refit the model.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.

BACKGROUND: Although rates of mammography screening among women in the general population have been increasing they still fall short of national goals. This study evaluated the effects on rates of participation in mammography screening of obtaining risk factor information and providing general or personalized risk information through direct mailed correspondence. METHODS: Women enrollees in a health maintenance organization (N = 2,076), age 50 and above, were randomized to one of the following four groups: (a) no risk factor questionnaire + generic invitation, (b) no risk factor questionnaire + general risk invitation, (c) risk factor questionnaire + general risk invitation, and (d) risk factor questionnaire + personal risk invitation. Computerized visit records were monitored for 12 months following a mailed invitation to assess whether a mammogram had been obtained. RESULTS: Overall participation was 37.5% and the rate of participation did not differ significantly across groups (P = 0.26). Participation was related to age (P < 0.02), with rates highest for women ages 60-69 years (42.7%) compared with those for women ages 50-59 (35.5%) and those age 70+ (33.7%). Among women with a family history of breast cancer, the personalized risk invitation was associated with significantly higher participation compared with general risk invitation (66.7 versus 42.9%, respectively; P < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Women with a family history of breast cancer are more likely to obtain a mammogram if that fact is reinforced as a risk factor. Research on environmental barriers to mammography screening may suggest alternative strategies for increasing participation.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles.

METHODS. A randomized pretest post-test control group design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a mail-out intervention for increasing screening mammography rates. A random sample of 802 women, 40+, residing in Los Angeles County, was surveyed by telephone at baseline and again 12 months after the intervention. RESULTS. Fifty percent of the intervention group and 56% of the control group had obtained a screening mammogram during the follow-up period. This difference was not statistically significant, indicating that the low-cost intervention was not successful in influencing screening mammography rates in this sample. In the combined intervention and control group, a stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed four baseline variables to be significant prospective predictors of mammography behavior during the follow-up period: Women who were adherent to the age-specific screening guidelines at baseline and women who had health insurance were more likely to obtain a mammogram during the follow-up, as were older women. Also, women who were greatly concerned about radiation exposure during a mammogram were about two and a half times less likely to obtain a mammogram during the follow-up than women who were less concerned. Self-reported reasons for adherence and nonadherence to screening guidelines are also described.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Variability in the timing of repeat screening mammography.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies have examined repeat mammography, they provide limited information about actual patterns of women's behavior over time. METHODS: In this study, 128 asymptomatic women ages 50 to 75 who had had their first mammograms 15 to 27 months previously were interviewed to determine rates of repeat mammography. Eighty-six of these women were HMO members; the remaining 42 were nonmembers. RESULTS: In both subpopulations, repeat mammography rates were low among women interviewed less than 21 months after their first mammogram, but much higher among those interviewed 21 months or more afterward. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that waiting up to 2 years to have a second mammogram may be at least as common a choice as having it after 1 year. It is of particular interest that this was found in a population of HMO members who receive reminders and vouchers for free mammograms annually.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Integrating pros and cons for mammography and Pap testing: extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors.

BACKGROUND: The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change. METHOD: Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40-74 (N = 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening. RESULTS: The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized community trial to increase mammography utilization among low-income women living in public housing.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of a community-based intervention on mammography use among low-income women living in public housing. METHODS: All 41 public housing high-rise buildings were randomized to treatment and delayed treatment (control) conditions. After a cross-sectional baseline survey, an intervention called Friend to Friend was conducted in the treatment buildings by American Cancer Society and building resident volunteers. The intervention consisted of a health professional talk, small group discussions, and an opportunity to request assistance in obtaining a mammogram or mammogram reminder. A second cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure differences in screening rates between the study groups. RESULTS: Participation in the intervention averaged 27%. The study groups were equivalent at baseline. At follow-up, the proportion of women age 50-79 years who reported mammography screening in the previous 15 months was significantly higher in the treatment group (64%) than in the control group (52%). Breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a multidimensional intervention which reaches women within their social environment and uses community volunteers can increase mammography utilization among women in public housing.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Effectiveness of telephone counseling for mammography: results from five randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Women over age 50 continue to be underscreened for breast cancer. The purpose of this report is to compare the effectiveness of a barrier-specific telephone counseling intervention across the five study sites of the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC). METHODS: Each of the BCSC projects was a randomized study of the effectiveness of telephone counseling (TC) in comparison to a control condition. Eligible underusers were identified and surveyed by telephone before and after the implementation of the interventions. Data from a total of 3,461 underusers were analyzed. We tested whether significantly more women randomized to TC than to control were regular mammography users at the follow-up survey. Data were analyzed separately by site. RESULTS: Overall, TC was not significantly more effective than control in encouraging regular mammography. The pooled consortium-wide odds ratio was 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.91 to 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: TC has the potential to support maintenance of mammogram use. Modifications are needed to maximize this potential and additional methods should be used in conjunction with TC to reach women who are underusers of mammography.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

How reliable is the evidence for screening mammography?

Substantial reduction in breast cancer mortality has been proven in randomized trials of screening mammography. These trials have found a statistically significant benefit both for women ages 40-49 years and for women age 50 years and older at onset of screening. In fact, it is likely that the trials actually underestimate the benefit for an individual woman who is screened. Service screening programs have shown a 63% reduction in deaths from breast cancer among women who are screened. Virtually all major medical organizations now advise screening mammography for women ages 40 and older. Two recent studies that questioned the validity of results from screening mammography trials are themselves fatally flawed.

Adult↗