Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,117 records · Page 62Linked to original sources

In vitro blood-brain barrier permeability of nevirapine compared to other HIV antiretroviral agents.

To combat infection and inhibit viral replication of HIV in the brain, antiretroviral agents must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). An in vitro BBB model consisting of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells grown on porous filters was used to study and compare the transport of nevirapine, a potent and selective nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with other HIV antiretroviral agents currently in use for the treatment of HIV infection. These included nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (delaviridine), and protease inhibitors (indinavir, saquinavir, VX-478). Nevirapine was the most permeable antiretroviral agent studied in the BBB model. The order of in vitro BBB permeability was nevirapine >> VX-478 > didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine > indinavir > saquinavir. There was an apparent bell-shaped relationship between in vitro BBB permeability and octanol/phosphate-buffered saline distribution coefficient (D) where all lipophilic (log D > 2.5) as well as hydrophilic (log D < -0.5) antiretrovirals were less permeable than nevirapine (log D = 1.8). There were no significant effects on the in vitro BBB permeability of nevirapine in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Saquinavir was the only drug shown to have an affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump, which may have contributed to its very low permeability. The apparent ability of nevirapine to readily permeate the BBB and enter the brain, where it may inhibit replication of HIV, potentially increases its therapeutic value.

Animals↗

Prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations among Spanish prison inmates.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse the prevalence of HIV-1 drug-resistance mutations among HIV-1-infected prison inmates in Spain. Treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with an HIV RNA viral load of >/=2,000 copies/ml were included. To ensure that the study population was representative of the entire HIV-infected Spanish inmate population, a two-stage conglomerate for selection of the sample was used. In the first stage, 15 prisons were randomly selected, and in the second stage, 38 patients (30 treatment-experienced and 8 treatment-naive) per centre were randomly selected. Genotyping was performed by automatic sequencing. Resistance testing was performed on viral strains from 184 inmates from 12 prisons. Valid sequences were obtained from 133 inmates (90 treatment-experienced and 43 treatment-naive inmates). Most (92.5%) were men and had acquired HIV infection by intravenous drug use (91%); their mean age was 35 years. One or more key resistance mutations were detected in 5 (11.6%) treatment-naive and in 35 (38.6%) treatment-experienced patients. Among treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients, resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was found in 3 (6.9%) and in 20 (22.2%) patients, respectively, resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 3 (6.9%) and in 21 (23.3%) patients, and resistance to protease inhibitors in 3 (6.9%) and in 14 (15.5%) patients. Multidrug resistance was detected in 1 of the 43 (2.3%) treatment-naive patients. These findings support the use of resistance testing in HIV-infected inmates who must begin antiretroviral therapy, given the high rate of primary resistance to drugs frequently included in the initial treatment regimens.

Adult↗

On the horizon: promising investigational antiretroviral agents.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affects close to 40 million individuals worldwide. Since 1981 when the first case reports of individuals dying from a then rare opportunistic infection were published, twenty million people have died from this epidemic. With 3 or more antiretrovirals as the standard of care, the prevalence of single, double and triple-class resistant HIV strains has increased significantly over the last 5 years due to the tremendous replicative capacity of HIV and selective drug pressure. With greater resistance comes the need for novel and effective antiretrovirals to treat these resistant strains. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most promising agents and classes in Phase II-III drug development by assessing the clinical efficacy, pharmacology, resistance and tolerability. Three out of the four existing antiretroviral classes (nucleosides, non-nucleosides, protease inhibitors) with agents in clinical trials will be discussed such as nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (D-d4FC, SPD754), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (capravirine, TMC125) and protease inhibitors (tipranavir, TMC114). In the next several years, antiretrovirals from novel pharmacologic classes will enter the HIV armamentarium. Based on the early clinical studies, these promising agents will be reviewed from the following classes: attachment inhibitors (TNX-355, BMS-488043), CCR5 coreceptor antagonists (SCH-D, UK-427857, GW 873140) and a maturation inhibitor (PA-457). It is hoped that these agents will represent a therapeutic advance and better activity against HIV resistant strains by providing effective therapy that will reduce viral load, increase the CD4+ cell count and ultimately, prolong survival with minimal adverse effects.

Animals↗

[Recommendations for non-occupational postexposure HIV prophylaxis. Spanish Working Group on Non-Occupational Postexposure HIV Prophylaxis of the Catalonian Center for Epidemiological Studies on AIDS and the AIDS Study Group].

Evidence is lacking on the possible efficacy and effectiveness of non-occupational postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). However, because of its biological plausibility, the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs to prevent the development of infection in certain cases of accidental or sporadic exposure has begun to be considered as common clinical practice. Previous studies performed in Spain have demonstrated both the demand and the prescription of ARV as PEP and especially the diversity and inconsistency in the criteria used. In this context, in April of 2000 the Centre for Epidemiological Studies on AIDS of Catalonia (CEESCAT) (Department of Health and Social Security of the Autonomous Government of Catalonia), in collaboration with the National AIDS Plan and the AIDS Study Group (GESIDA), promoted the creation of a working group for the drafting of recommendations for PEP against HIV outside the occupational health context. The recommendations have been made bearing in mind the exceptional character of the exposure, the time elapsed since exposure, as well as evaluation of the risk of infection according to the type of exposure and the information available on the source of infection. In addition, the recommendations include the immediate measures necessary, as well as the preventive measures and clinical follow-up required both for HIV and for other infectious agents. All PEP regimens should be started within 72 hours of exposure and appropriate daily doses of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and a protease inhibitor (PI), or two NRTIs and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs), should be administered for four weeks, bearing in mind the pharmacological and clinical situation of the source person. These recommendations should be updated periodically.

Adult↗

Pilot study of saquinavir and lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-positive patients.

PURPOSE: Protease inhibitor (PI)-naive patients may have limited reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI) options due to resistance and/or toxicity. Effective, well-tolerated nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens are therefore needed. METHOD: This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir (1000/400/100 mg bid) in PI-naive patients over 48 weeks. The regimen could be intensified with NRTIs if patients did not achieve virologic suppression by 12 weeks. The primary study endpoint was virologic suppression at 48 weeks. Additional study objectives included assessment of safety, CD4 cell counts, blood lipids, PI trough levels, and anthropometrics. RESULTS: Of the 20 PI-naive study participants, 16 completed 48 weeks of study treatment, with no discontinuations attributed to virologic failure. Fourteen of 16 patients achieved virologic suppression with only the PIs; 2 patients required tenofovir intensification to achieve complete suppression. Median CD4 counts increased significantly over 48 weeks. Adverse events were generally mild and manageable. Extreme lipid elevations were uncommon, although moderate lipid elevations occurred in the majority of patients. Most patients reported some degree of central fat accumulation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 1000/400/100 mg bid with tenofovir intensification is a potent nucleoside-sparing regimen for PI-naive patients, associated with durable HIV suppression and improved CD4 cell counts. Fat accumulation and metabolic changes observed in this study warrant confirmation from ongoing trials.

Adult↗

Constant mitochondrial DNA levels in blood leukocytes of patients enrolled in a NRTI-free therapeutic trial (BIKS-2 study).

OBJECTIVES: Determine if a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-free regimen affected mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients enrolled in BIKS-2 trial. METHODS: Antiretroviral (ARV) naïve (N=13) and NRTI experienced (N=7) patients, received lopinavir/ritonavir, a boosted protease inhibitor, and efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor from Month (M) 0 to M12 (1-year BIKS trial) and from M12 to M36 (2-year BIKS-2 trial). MtDNA was quantified at M12, M24 and M36 via real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: From M12 to M36, the 20 patients have maintained undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, gained CD4 cells and had no side effects attributable to these drugs. Median mtDNA contents were constant: 478.6 at M12, 478.6 at M24 and 324.4 copies/cell at M36 (pM12-M36=0.5). Because M0 data is missing, these results were compared to those of two groups of age matched individuals: healthy donors and HIV-infected patients before and after exposure to NRTIs. Healthy donors have higher contents (871), followed by patients never treated (602), than by BIKS patients where 7 had toxic NRTIs (478.6) and at last by patients exposed for six months to the most toxic combination (ddI-d4T) (85 copies/cell). CONCLUSION: Lopinavir/ritonavir+efavirenz did not affect mtDNA contents in PBMCs.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗

Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretrovirals (ARV) improves patient care. However, little is known about the usefulness of TDM in routine practice. METHOD: We reviewed all the trough concentrations of protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that were performed for therapeutic failure, suspected drug toxicity, or routine purposes. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2001, 146 TDMs were done in 109 HIV patients. Of the 48 patients with therapeutic failure, 62% had resistance to ARV with adequate ARV concentrations, 16% had insufficient drug exposure without any ARV resistance mutations, and 16% combined both resistance and suboptimal drug concentrations. Subsequent therapeutic interventions (increasing adherence and/or changing HAART) resulted in an undetectable viral load in 37.5% of the patients (14/48). Five (24%) of 21 patients with suspected drug toxicity had high drug concentrations associated with side effects. In all the cases, adverse events regressed after reduction of drug dosage. Of the 77 TDMs done for routine purposes, 26% were outside the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: The data show that TDM of ARVs in the clinical setting provides important information that can be used to improve the management of HIV patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.

Diagnostic Tests, Routine↗

Frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients on protease inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of HIV-1 protease inhibitors on the frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. STUDY DESIGN: A clinical and analytic follow-up was carried out to determine the number of episodes of oropharyngeal candidiasis during HIV-1 protease inhibitor therapy and the relation of this incidence to the CD4 lymphocyte count and circulating neutrophils level. Seventy-five HIV-positive patients were selected, and HIV-1 protease inhibitor therapy was administered to each patient over a minimum of 6 months. These patients did not receive long-term preventive antifungal therapy for oral candidiasis, even as secondary prophylaxis against cryptococcosis. Results were compared with those obtained during the previous 6 months, during which patients had been treated only with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. RESULTS: At least one episode of oropharyngeal candidiasis was seen in 56% (42/75) of patients during reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy and in only 9.3% (7/75) of patients after the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy. The number of relapses decreased significantly when the 2 follow-up periods were compared (P<.0001). The CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte counts increased significantly with protease inhibitor therapy (P<.001 and P<.05, respectively). During reverse transcriptase inhibitor treatment, the probability of the presentation of oropharyngeal candidiasis correlated with falling CD4 counts (P<.0001). The HIV-1 protease inhibitor therapy was associated with a significant increase in the neutrophil count (P<.01). The probability of the occurrence of some episode of candidiasis correlated inversely with the circulating neutrophil level (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Protease inhibitor therapy decreases the frequency of HIV-related oropharyngeal candidiasis. The mechanism involved is unknown, but it can be speculated that a reduction of the viral load increases the number of intact T helper cells, which in turn enhances the number of circulating polymorphonuclear neutrophils and regulates their function by means of colony-stimulating factors.

Adult↗

Simultaneous determination of 16 anti-HIV drugs in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is pivotal to improve the management of HIV infection. Here, a HPLC-UV method has been developed to quantify simultaneously seven HIV protease inhibitors (amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir; PIs), seven nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, and zidovudine; NRTIs), and two non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (efavirenz and nevirapine; NNRTIs) in human plasma. The volume of the plasma sample was 600 microL. This method involved automated solid-phase extraction with Oasis HLB Cartridge 1 cc (divinylbenzene and N-vinylpyrrolidone) and evaporation in a water bath under nitrogen stream. The extracted samples were reconstituted with 100 microL methanol. Twenty microliters of these samples were injected into a HPLC-UV system, the analytes were eluted on an analytical C(18) Symmetry column (250 mm x 4.6mm I.D.) with a particle size of 5 microm. The mobile phase (0.01 M KH(2)PO(4) and acetonitrile) was delivered at 1.0 mL/min with linear gradient elution. The total run time for a single analysis was 35 min, the anti-HIV drugs were detected by UV at 240 and 260 nm. The calibration curves were linear up to 10 microg/mL. The absolute recovery ranged between 88 and 120%. The in vitro stability of anti-HIV drugs (0.005-10 microg/mL) in plasma has been studied at 24.0 degrees C. On these bases, a two to four analyte method has been tailored to the individual needs of the HIV-infected patient. The HPLC-UV method here reported has been validated and is currently applied to monitor PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs in plasma of HIV-infected patients. It allows to monitor the largest number of anti-HIV drugs simultaneously, appearing useful in a routine laboratory, and represents an essential step to elucidate the utility of a formal therapeutic drug monitoring for the optimal follow-up of HIV-infected patients.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

An introduction to nucleoside and nucleotide analogues.

The introduction of newer and more potent agents has diverted attention away from the importance of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in modern antiretroviral drug regimens. As a class, these proviral chain terminators lack the virological potency of either non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) drugs, due largely to their competitive mode of inhibition and requirement for metabolic activation. However, neither NNRTIs nor PIs alone can maintain the complete suppression of HIV replication required for extended therapy, and both suffer from serious class cross-resistance on therapeutic failure. Thus, the NRTIs will remain essential components of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the foreseeable future, both for their contribution to a regimen's virological potency and the subsequent preservation of the more potent drug classes used with them. However, it has become apparent in recent years that the current NRTIs exhibit duration-dependent adverse events as a class, which may limit the length of time for which they can be safely used. An independent contribution to peripheral fat wasting in lipodystrophy syndrome has been established for the use of NRTI drugs. Of greater clinical concern is their established association with potentially fatal lactic acidaemia and hepatic steatosis. Both these class events, as well as several individual drug events, such as peripheral; neuropathy, can be linked to progressive mitochondrial destruction with a greater or lesser degree of confidence. Mitochondrial toxicity, due in large part to the high affinity of several NRTI agents for uptake by mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma, has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. New chain-terminating agents are urgently needed that address issues of improved virological potency, greater efficacy in NRTI-experienced individuals, and greater long-term safety. The nucleotide class of reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI), currently under clinical development, addresses improved potency by abbreviating the intracellular activation pathway to allow a more rapid and complete conversion to the active agent. These nucleoside monophosphate analogues are taken as masked prodrugs bearing labile lipophilic groups to facilitate penetration of target cell membranes. Subsequent unmasking by endogenous chemolytic enzymes releases a partially activated nucleoside analogue metabolite. The NtRTI furthest along the developmental process is tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an orally available acyclic adenine phosphonate analogue, currently in Phase III clinical trials. This agent has shown high potency and an unusually durable response in trials of single-agent therapy intensification in highly treatment-experienced individuals, and its active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, exhibits a long intracellular half-life in both resting and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells that permits once daily dosing. Tenofovir diphosphate also exhibits a very low affinity for DNA polymerase gamma in vitro, suggesting a low degree of in vivo mitochondrial toxicity may be observed on long-term follow-up, although clinical data to support this inference are not yet available. The introduction of TDF and other NtRTIs as 'second-generation' nucleoside analogues carefully evaluated for potential long-term toxicity, can be expected to significantly improve the therapeutic options for both those currently on HAART and those yet to begin.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

S-1153 inhibits replication of known drug-resistant strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

S-1153 is a new imidazole compound that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) replication by acting as a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). This compound inhibits replication of HIV-1 strains that are resistant to nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. S-1153 has a 50% effective concentration in the range of 0.3 to 7 ng/ml for strains with single amino acid substitutions that cause NNRTI resistance, including the Y181C mutant, and also has potent activity against clinical isolates. The emergence of S-1153-resistant variants is slower than that for nevirapine, and S-1153-resistant variants contained at least two amino acid substitutions, including F227L or L234I. S-1153-resistant variants are still sensitive to the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors zidovudine (AZT) and lamivudine. In a mouse and MT-4 (human T-cell line) in vivo HIV replication model, S-1153 and AZT administered orally showed a marked synergy for the inhibition of HIV-1 replication. S-1153 shows a significant accumulation in lymph nodes, where most HIV-1 infection is thought to occur. S-1153 may be an appropriate candidate for two-to three-drug combination therapy for HIV infection.

Animals↗

German-Austrian Guidelines for HIV-therapy during pregnancy--status: May/June 1998--common statement of the Deutsche AIDS-Gesellschaft (DAIG) and the Osterreichische AIDS-Gesellschaft (OAG).

The same guidelines are valid for HIV-infected women during pregnancy as for HIV-infected adults. The only modification of these guidelines necessary is that treatment is indicated in clinically asymptomatic pregnant patients when the T-helper cell count is <250-400/microl. Initial therapy is a 3-drug combination including two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and one protease inhibitor (PI) or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Since the teratogenicity of PI and NNRTI is unclear, a virologically weaker two-drug combination consisting of 2 NRTIs can be resorted to. When therapy is pending, embryonal toxicological factors require a decision to be made in the first trimester of pregnancy as to whether a therapy pause of maximally 3 months is medically tenable for the pregnant woman. The decision should be adjusted to the risk and reached in each individual case after consulting with the future mother. The same substances can be administered when antiretroviral medication is started again, since it is unlikely that resistance will develop. To reduce the risk of vertical transmission, the following prophylactic regimen is recommended during delivery: 1) zidovudine treatment of the mother after completion of the 32nd week of pregnancy (32 + 0) at a dosage of 5 x 100 mg/day or 2 x 250 mg/day orally; if necessary, in addition to the ongoing antiretroviral therapy. 2) first-option cesarean section along with preparation of fetal membrane before onset of labor in the 36th completed week of pregnancy (36 + 0). 3) preoperative intravenous zidovudine therapy (2 mg/kg body weight). 4) postnatal zidovudine therapy of the child for 10 days intravenously (1.3 mg/kg every 6 hours) or 2-6 weeks orally (2 mg/kg every 6 hours). In exceptional obstetric cases, e.g., premature labor, premature rupture of the membranes, amniotic infection syndrome, or multiple pregnancy, cesarean section is also the preferred mode of delivery. However, the decision must be made on the basis of obstetric concerns. If prophylaxis to prevent transmission has been incomplete, at least intrapartum and postnatal treatment should be given. If the HIV status of the mother is unclear, it must be ascertained in order to administer a prophylaxis to prevent transmission if necessary. A competent consultation must always be offered, if appropriate also together with a relevant institution.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Immunological recovery despite virological failure is independent of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 resistant mutants in children receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Relationships between human immunodeficiency virus-type-1 (HIV-1) drug-resistant mutants and immunological recovery were investigated after 12-week antiretroviral therapy in 43 children infected perinatally with virological failure. Twenty-two children received highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and 21 received double therapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. At baseline, no difference in reverse transcriptase or protease inhibitors resistant mutants was present among the groups. After 12 weeks, the two groups were similar regarding proportion of children with reverse transcriptase resistant mutants. Sixteen (73%) HAART-treated children, but no child receiving double therapy had HIV-1 with primary resistance mutations to protease inhibitors. Secondary protease mutations were found in all HAART-treated and in 17/21 (81%) children receiving double therapy. The mutation numbers in reverse transcriptase or protease genes were significantly higher after HAART than after double therapy. Nevertheless, 12 (55%) of HAART-treated children (but no child receiving double therapy) showed immunological recovery. The frequency and number of mutations were similar in HAART-treated children with or without immunological recovery both at baseline and after 12 weeks. The findings suggest, immunological recovery notwithstanding, virological failure is independent of drug-resistant mutations and consequent possible changes in viral fitness.

Adolescent↗

Nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected patients results in an anti-atherogenic lipid profile.

BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is associated with elevated triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels which may expose patients to an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). We report the lipid and lipoprotein profiles of a representative subset of treatment-naive patients included in the Atlantic Study. This study compares patients treated with stavudine and didanosine plus the random addition of either the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine (NVP), the protease inhibitor indinavir or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine. METHODS: Lipids and lipoproteins were quantified from prospectively collected and cryopreserved plasma samples obtained at weeks 0, 6 and 24. RESULTS: We observed a striking increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (49%), apolipoprotein AI (19%), lipoprotein AI (38%) and HDL particle size (3%) in the NVP-treated patients (n = 34) at week 24. Much less pronounced changes in these parameters were seen to a similar extent both in patients receiving lamivudine (n = 39) and indinavir (n = 41). LDL-cholesterol also increased significantly both in the NVP and indinavir arms, but only in the NVP arm was this offset by a significant reduction (14%) in total over HDL-cholesterol ratio. Using a multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA both at baseline and during treatment, randomization to the NVP-containing arm remained significant in explaining the observed changes in HDL-cholesterol and other HDL-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-1 infected patients treated with a regimen of stavudine, didanosine and NVP we found changes in lipids and lipoproteins which are associated with a sharp decrease in risk for CAD in other settings. If confirmed in larger studies, these findings both may influence the initial choice of therapy for HIV-1 infection, and might lead to novel approaches targeted at raising HDL-cholesterol for CAD prevention.

Adult↗

Immunologic reconstitution after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral therapy, with or without protease inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of two triple antiretroviral combinations (2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] + 1 protease inhibitors [PI] vs. 2 NRTIs + 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]) to correct T-cell subsets abnormalities and to restore immune functions in asymptomatic antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients with a baseline CD4 T-cell counts >500/mm3 and plasma viral load >5000 copies/mL. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty randomized patients from 2 cohort studies receiving either stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) + indinavir (n = 9), or d4T + didanosine (ddI) + nevirapine (NVP) (n = 11) were studied. Viral load, T-cell subsets and T-cell functions were analyzed at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: After 1 year of follow-up, the PI regimen was significantly more effective in reducing plasma and lymphoid tissue VL to undetectable levels. A significant increase in CD4+ T cells was observed in patients treated with PI (p =.0007) compared with those treated with NVP. Percentages of CD8+ T-cells and of activated CD8+ T-cells (CD38+ and DR+ as well as memory CD45RO+) decreased in all patients. An increase of the CD28+ subset of CD8+ T-cells also occurred in both groups of treatment. Naive T cells were maintained in the CD4+ subset and augmented in the CD8+ subset in all patients. In both PI and NVP groups, memory CD4+ T-cells increased significantly (p =.03). Peripheral blood mononuclear cell responsiveness to polyclonal stimuli and to tetanus toxoid and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen was similar in both groups of treatment. HIV-infected patients treated for 1 year with both triple combinations lacked significant T-cell responsiveness to HIV-1 proteins. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that immune reconstitution achieved after 1 year of therapy with PI-containing or PI-sparing regimens is similar, despite the higher effectiveness of PI-containing regimens in reducing viral load. Additional therapeutic approaches should be designed to restore HIV-1-specific responses.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

Saquinavir. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in the management of HIV infection.

Saquinavir is a peptide derivative which inhibits the HIV protease enzyme, preventing post-translational processing of viral polyproteins. It was the first agent of its class to become available for the treatment of HIV infection. Well controlled studies have assessed the effects of saquinavir, when used alone or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients with advanced HIV infection. Analysis of CD4+ cell counts and measures of viral load in the ACTG 229 study suggest that triple therapy with saquinavir, zidovudine and zalcitabine is more effective than double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine or zidovudine plus zalcitabine in patients who have previously received long term treatment with zidovudine. Similar assessments from a small study in previously untreated patients suggest that double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine is more effective than monotherapy with either agent. Combination therapy with saquinavir and zalcitabine significantly reduced the time to the first AIDS-defining event or death, and the time to death, compared with zalcitabine alone, according to data from a large, long term study (NV 14256) in patients with advanced HIV infection who had previously received zidovudine. Saquinavir is generally well tolerated, either as monotherapy or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors; no change in tolerability profile was reported when saquinavir was added to treatment with nucleoside analogues. In vitro and clinical studies have documented the emergence of saquinavir-resistant HIV strains. Although the possible impact of resistance on the clinical efficacy of saquinavir has yet to be fully characterised, genotypic and phenotypic resistance appear to develop slowly during treatment with saquinavir, and the drug does not appear to have a significant effect on the incidence of mutations associated with cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. Thus, laboratory and clinical results suggest that saquinavir in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors is effective in the treatment of advanced HIV infection. Initial data on the effects of saquinavir on disease progression and mortality are promising, and the apparent absence of mutations conferring cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors is a potentially valuable clinical feature. Additional data on disease progression, mortality and viral resistance, together with information on relative efficacy (in comparison with other protease inhibitors), will need to be assessed before the clinical value of saquinavir can be fully determined. Nevertheless, saquinavir represents a valuable new pharmacological option for the treatment of HIV infection and is likely to be a useful component of combined therapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Drug-selected resistance mutations and non-B subtypes in antiretroviral-naive adults with established human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 antiretroviral resistance is expected to be higher in recently infected antiretroviral-naive individuals than in those who have been infected longer. Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected adults who presented to an outpatient clinic in an urban hospital in Boston for initial evaluation in 1999 were screened for drug-selected resistance mutations and phylogenetic subtype. Drug-selected mutations were identified in 16 (18%) of 88 subjects. Twelve (14%) included mutations associated with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, 4 (5%) included mutations associated with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and 3 (3%) included mutations associated with protease inhibitors. Two (2%) had resistance mutations associated with multiple classes of drugs. Nine (10%) subjects had infection with non-B subtype HIV-1 and did not have drug-selected mutations. Serological results indicated infection for >/=6 months. Drug-selected mutations or non-B subtypes were detected in a substantial portion of antiretroviral-naive adults who had been infected for at least 6 months.

Adult↗

Severe cutaneous reactions associated with the use of human immunodeficiency virus medications.

Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus are highly susceptible to adverse dermatological reactions to specific medications. Severe cutaneous conditions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are associated with high morbidity and, notably for toxic epidermal necrolysis, high mortality. Although overall mortality from human immunodeficiency virus has dramatically declined owing to highly active antiretroviral therapy, these antiretroviral regimens have been associated with a wide spectrum of severe cutaneous reactions. We reviewed case reports and clinical trials in the English literature on Medline (1966 to 2001) and Aidsline (1980 to 2000) to determine the prevalence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis attributable to the current FDA approved antiretroviral medications. We identified a total of approximately 50 patients who had Stevens-Johnson syndrome and/or toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of 5 antiretroviral medications: 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, zidovudine (2 patients) and didanosine (1 patient); 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nevirapine (42 patients); and 2 protease inhibitors, indinavir (1 patient) and amprenavir (an unspecified number within the 1% of over 1400 patients experiencing severe life-threatening reactions). Of the reports that specified the onset time of adverse reaction after initiation of treatment, 86% (19/22) of patients experienced reactions within 4 weeks. Ten of the approximately 50 patients were diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis, due to specific antiretroviral medication, or a combination of medications identified by either resolution upon withdrawal, consistent biopsy findings or a positive rechallenge. The remainder of the identified patients were reported in articles lacking data regarding drug administration, reaction history or other details.

Anti-HIV Agents↗