Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reproductive Rights”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,117 records · Page 62Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Ethical considerations on indications for gender selection in Japan.

Gender selection is a matter of great concern to a cohort of parents. To what extent the methods available are ethically acceptable at present differs depending upon the society and times the couples live in. In the present communication, the current situation in Japan in use for gender selection by empirical methods without sperm separation, conventional methods with sperm separation and preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human embryos has been provided and considered in the light of human dignity as well as human right.

Economics↗
PubMed1982

Rights on DNA.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bioethics↗
PubMed2004

Feminist ethics must inform practice: interventions with perinatal substance users.

Substance use during pregnancy is a major health and social issue in countries around the world. Even though many health professional associations recommend a voluntary health promotion approach to treatment, some professionals and legislators have pursued mandatory treatment, or protective intervention. A feminist ethic perspective of treatment invites us to consider a broader notion of autonomy, which includes the contexts in which women live, the difficulty they often have in accessing treatment services, and their endurance of systematic oppression related to ethnicity, socioeconomics, and politics. A punitive approach to treatment is not associated with improved outcomes for the fetus; in fact, the fetus may be at greater risk as women are fearful of accessing health services. Treatment is best pursued on a common ground basis within an embodied model of maternal-fetal relationship that will help support women and at the same time help ensure fetal health.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Human cloning: a case of no harm done?

Some have objected to the laboratory cloning of human preembryos on the grounds that the procedure would violate the dignity of and respect owed to human preembryos. Others have argued that human cloning ought be permitted if it will predictably benefit, or at least not burden, individuals who are, unlike the human preembryo, clearly entitled to our respect and concern. Taking this latter position, the legal theorist John A. Robertson has argued that, since cloning does not harm anyone who is clearly entitled to our respect and concern, it should be permitted. In particular, the offspring of cloning, he argues, cannot be genuinely harmed by cloning, since they owe their very existence to the cloning procedure. In this paper, I argue that cloning coupled with its related procedures does in fact place the flesh and blood human offspring of cloning at risk of genuine harm. I thus provide a basis for questioning the moral permissibility of cloning and its related technologies without implying that the human preembryo has dignity or is owed respect.

Bioethics↗