Erythema multiforme-like eruption: an unusual presentation of primula contact allergy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To determine the incidence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a descriptive epidemiology study was performed using computerized Medicaid billing data from 1980 to 1984 from the states of Michigan, Minnesota, and Florida. The ratio of persons hospitalized with a discharge diagnosis of erythema multiforme (ICD-9-CM code 695.1) to persons with any claim for medical service was first used as an estimate of the incidence rate of the disease. Then, since the ICD-9-CM code for erythema multiforme includes other illnesses in addition to Stevens-Johnson syndrome and because these illnesses are frequently misdiagnosed, the information provided by a review of medical records for a subset of cases of erythema multiforme was used to determine the proportion of patients with true Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The incidence rates of Stevens-Johnson syndrome were 7.1 (6.1 to 8.2), 2.6 (1.6 to 4.0), and 6.8 (4.3 to 10.3) per million per year in each state, respectively. Penicillins, especially aminopenicillins, were frequently used in the 19 patients judged to be true cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. In conclusion, Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a uncommon condition. The excess risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome due to any drug must, therefore, be very low.
Leflunomide is an antirheumatic agent of the type of a 'disease-modifying antirheumatic drug'. In rare cases, severe skin reactions up to the extreme expression of toxic epidermal necrolysis have been observed. A female patient with rheumatoid arthritis had been treated with systemic steroids and methotrexate for 2 years. Five weeks prior to admission to our hospital methotrexate was replaced by leflunomide. Three weeks after initiation of leflunomide therapy a progressive generalized erythema with blistering formation occurred accompanied by increase of body temperature, chills and erosive lesions on the lips and oral mucosa. The palmar and plantar surfaces revealed edema, erythema and pulpitis with epidermolysis. On histologic examination necrotic keratinocytes and epidermal spongiosis were observed. After administration of high-dose prednisolone and topical treatment the patient recovered within 14 days. This is one of the few cases of severe drug reaction after intake of leflunomide. Therefore, the indication of this relatively new drug should be considered carefully.
In 1969-1973, acute yersiniosis was diagnosed in 30 cases of erythema nodosum (EN), in 6 cases of EN and simultaneous erythema multiforme (EM), in one case of EN and erythema figuratum, in one case of EM, and in one case of drug eruption-like exanthema, respectively. During these years, 180 patients with EN due to other causes were seen. The most marked difference in the clinical course between yersiniosis and other cases was the duration of the eruption. EN nodules in yersinia EN faded away in 4 weeks in all but one case while the 4-week cure rate among the other patients with EN was only 37%. There were two types of EM lesions, namely cockade-like lesions and vesicopapules. They usually appeared some days before or together with EN nodules and they disappeared within 2 weeks without any scarring. Yersiniosis was caused by Y. enterocolitica serotype 3 in 19 cases. Y.ent. serotype 9 in 17 cases, and Y.pseudotuberculosis in 3 cases. Of the patients, 21 suffered from abdominal pains and/or diarrhoea prior to skin manifestations, but 11 had no pregastrointestinal symptoms resembling those of yersiniosis.
Many systemic diseases have cutaneous manifestations. In some diseases skin involvement is the predominant factor (Behçet's syndrome, urticaria pigmentosa, discoid lupus erythematosus and pseudoxanthoma elasticum); in others the skin manifestations, when present, are an important part of the condition (sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypersensitivity angiitis, porphyria). This report includes descriptions of and comments on these cutaneous manifestations. Erythema nodosum and erythema multiforme are reaction patterns of the skin and mucous membrane which may have many causes. The relationship between discoid and systemic lupus erythematosus is discussed. There is little doubt that these are variations of the same basic disease process, even though the prognoses are very different.
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse reactions are frequently described with anticonvulsant drugs, especially with aromatic drugs such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Patch tests could be useful for diagnosing this clinical picture. Hypersensitivity to several anticonvulsant drugs is common but unpredictable. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients from our allergy section, suffering from anticonvulsant skin allergy, were included. We describe their analitic alterations, responsible drugs, and anticonvulsants tolerated, the results of patch tests with anticonvulsant drugs (5% pet. and aq.), and skin biopsies wherever carried out. RESULTS: 23 adverse skin reactions with different anticonvulsant drugs occurred in the 15 patients: 13 resulted in fever and generalized cutaneous rash, 7 patients suffered only from cutaneous rash. There was one case of palpable purpura, one of erythema multiforme (target lesions), and another one suffered only cutaneous pruritus. Eosinophilia was found in 5 cases. Liver enzymes were elevated in 9 (7 of whom suffered fever and cutaneous rash). The responsible drugs were carbamazepine (8 adverse reactions), phenytoin (5), lamotrigine (4), phenobarbital (4), sodium valproate (1), and felbamate (1). The drugs tolerated were sodium valproate (6 patients), topiramate (4), vigabatrin (2), lamotrigine (1), clonazepam (1), and gabapentin (1). We found 12 positive patch tests: 6 with carbamazepine, 3 with phenytoin and, 1 each with lamotrigine, sodium valproate and phenobarbital. Skin biopsies were carried out in 5 patients, 4 of whom showed some characteristic findings of erythema multiforme (lymphocytic exocytosis, dyskeratotic cells, vacuolation of basal cells and pigmentary incontinence) and the other one showed a typical leucocytoclastic angitis. CONCLUSIONS: The cutaneous adverse reactions more frequently seen in our allergy section because of anticonvulsant drugs are rashes with fever. Eosinophilia and elevated levels of liver enzymes are frequently associated. This clinical picture is called "anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome." The drugs implicated most frequently are carbamazepine and phenytoin. Hypersensitivity to more than one drug was variable and unpredictable. The best-tolerated drug was sodium valproate, but it was not tolerated by a patient with phenytoin and carbamazepine hypersensitivity. Patch tests are useful for diagnosing anticonvulsant hypersensitivity. The most frequently findings in the skin biopsies were typical of erythema multiforme.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Orf is a zoonosis caused by an epitheliotropic DNA parapox virus. Human orf is a generally benign, self-limiting condition that usually regresses in 6-8 weeks without specific treatment. However, it may be accompanied by local symptoms including pain, pruritus, lymphangitis and axillary adenitis, or less frequently by systemic symptoms such as fever or malaise. Furthermore, it may be complicated by erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erysipelas, generalized mucocutaneous eruption, toxic erythema, eyelid oedema and giant, persistent or recurrent lesions in immunocompromised patients. Imiquimod, a potent topical immune response modifier, enhances both the innate and acquired immunity by stimulation of immune system cells resulting in local antiviral, antitumour and immunoregulatory activity. We present, for the first time, four complicated cases of orf successfully treated by topical imiquimod resulting in rapid regression of both orf and associated lesions. Two of the cases were complicated with erythema multiforme, one with recurrent eyelid oedema, and another had giant orf associated with axillary lymphadenitis. We suggest that topical imiquimod may be an effective and safe therapy for complicated orf cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Seizure prophylaxis with phenytoin is a common measure in oncologic patients with brain metastases. In these patients, generalized severe adverse drug reactions such as erythema multiforme (EEM) may occur. However, in a subgroup of patients with brain radiation therapy, EEM-like lesions develop particularly in the radiation field. Most recently, the acronym EMPACT (Erythema Multiforme associated with Phenytoin And Cranial radiation Therapy) was proposed to specifically describe this syndrome. PATIENT/METHOD: Here, we report on EMPACT syndrome in a 46-year-old woman. Therapeutic measures included seizure prophylaxis with phenytoin and total brain radiation therapy of brain metastases from bronchial carcinoma. Three weeks after introduction of phenytoin, the patient presented with EEM-like skin lesions restricted to the original radiation field and facial mucocutaneous involvement. After a few days, the rash spread to the upper part of the body. She was also in poor general condition. RESULTS: The immediate cessation of phenytoin therapy, combined with administration of systemic corticosteroids and high dose immunoglobulins along with intensive local treatment and pain medications, resulted in complete resolution of the skin eruption. Patch testing to phenytoin was positive after 72 hours. CONCLUSION: EMPACT should be classified as an specific entity among the EEM-like drug reactions as it only appears after radiotherapy and seizure prophylaxis with the anticonvulsant phenytoin. We propose including specific type IV-sensitization to phenytoin into the definition of EMPACT.
The most common adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are gastritis, peptic ulceration, and depression of renal function, all of which result primarily from prostaglandin inhibition. The types of side effects observed with diclofenac are similar to those of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are unavoidable given that the drugs are prostaglandin inhibitors. However, the incidences of such side effects may be lower with diclofenac than with some of the other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Worldwide experience with diclofenac exceeds 7.6 million patient-years, which should provide estimates of the frequency of very rare adverse reactions. The latter include blood dyscrasias, erythema multiforme, hepatitis, and others, such as aseptic meningitis, anaphylaxis, and urticaria. Moreover, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs appear to have unique side-effect profiles. Examples include a higher incidence of ulceration and erythema multiforme with piroxicam, and acute pancreatitis, in rare instances, with sulindac. From a careful survey of the world's accumulated literature and reports to CIBA-GEIGY, diclofenac does not appear to have any unusual adverse reactions.
Lichenoid dermatosis is a pattern description of a variety of cutaneous lesions which primarily affect the dermoepidermal junction. Involvement of skin appendages has been restricted to hair follicles in lichen planopilaris and discoid lupus erythematosus. Sweat gland involvement has not been described in the four common members of this group, namely, lichen planus, discoid lupus erythematosus, fixed drug eruptions and erythema multiforme, although structural abnormalities have been reported in graft-versus-host disease. In a detailed morphological study of 59 cases, including lichen planus (12), discoid lupus erythematosus (18), fixed drug eruption (14) and erythema multiforme (15), 78% (47/59) showed sweat, gland abnormalities. The abnormalities included vacuolation of cell cytoplasm, with and without lymphocytic infiltration, apoptosis of basal cells and basal cell hyperplasia of the excretory ducts which predominantly affected the portion of the duct adjoining the acrosyringium. The portion of the duct close to the secretory gland was only involved in continuity and the secretory glands were unaffected. These abnormalities of the sweat gland mostly constitute primary involvement by the disease process in contrast to structural abnormalities secondary to fibrosis.
This paper summarises some of the oral adverse effects of antiretroviral agents. Some are related to bone marrow suppression which may also predispose to mouth ulcers. Erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis are especially well recognized in HIV disease, particularly as reactions to sulphonamides and to antiretroviral agents. Oral lichenoid reactions have been described in HIV disease often relating to zidovudine use. Didanosine has also produced erythema multiforme and not unusually induces xerostomia, again by an unknown mechanism. Xerostomia may be seen in up to one-third of patients taking didanosine. Taste abnormalities are common with the protease inhibitors and oral and perioral paraesthesia can be a disturbing adverse effect. Ritonavir in particular can give rise to circumoral paraesthesia in over 25% of patients. Indinavir can also produce cheilitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.