Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “laparoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources
PubMed1975

The value of laparoscopy in acute pelvic pain.

Laparoscopy was performed in 223 patients with acute pelvic pain but without a definite diagnosis. The clinically suspected diagnosis was confirmed by laparoscopy in only 57 patients (25%). Laparotomy was thus avoided in 145 patients (65%). The endoscopic findings in the three clinical entities included here are presented: tubal pregnancy, acute appendicitis or torsion of adnexal mass. This study emphasizes the poor correlation between the clinical diagnosis based on history, pelvic examination and physical signs, and the final laparoscopic findings. The value of laparoscopy in evaluation of acute pelvic disease is stressed.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed1980

Laparoscopy for questionable appendicitis: can it reduce the negative appendectomy rate?

Laparoscopy has been performed in 32 patients in whom the diagnosis of appendicitis was suspected, but in whom clinical findings were equivocal and insufficient to establish the diagnosis. These patients represented 13.6% of the total group of patients admitted with questionable appendicitis during this period. Fifty per cent of these 32 patients had unusual clinical features, such as a prolonged history of symptoms, significant intercurrent disease, prior treatment with antibiotics or steroids, etc. At laparoscopy, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made in 17 patients. Another disease was diagnosed in 8 patients, and 7 were judged to have no pathologic abnormalities. There were two false negative examinations and one false positive, but no ruptured appendices resulted. Twelve patients (37.5%) were spared operation by laparoscopy. The negative appendectomy rate was decreased from 10 to 1%.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Safety and risks of laparoscopy in pregnancy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the indications, and the safety and efficacy of operative laparoscopy in pregnancy with a particular attention to the pregnancy outcome. RECENT FINDINGS: Hemodynamics changes during laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy are similar to those observed in the nonpregnant state. The procedure appears to be safe and reduces hospital admissions and frequency of premature labor. The safest time to perform laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy is at the second trimester. However, it can be complicated by injury to the gravid uterus and pregnancy loss. This is illustrated by a recent report of accidental gas insufflation into the amniotic cavity leading to the fetal loss. SUMMARY: The most common indications of laparoscopy in pregnancy are cholelithiasis, appendicitis, persistent ovarian cyst and adnexal torsion. In general, it is associated with a good maternal and fetal outcome. The occurrence of a miscarriage, premature labor or fetal death appears to be related to the underlying pathology, independent of the operative intervention. Due to the displacement of the appendix by the gravid uterus and the physiologic elevation of white blood cell count in pregnancy, diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy can be delayed with its sequelle. In one report, the incidence of fetal loss is 1.5% in uncomplicated appendicitis and 35% in the presence of ruptured appendicitis. Similarly, the fetal loss rate in uncomplicated cholecystectomy is 4%, but the fetal mortality in gallstone pacreatitis could be up to 60%. Laparoscopy in pregnancy should be performed with utmost care. In the second trimester of pregnancy, open laparoscopic approach is strongly recommended.

Embryonic and Fetal Development↗
PubMed1993

The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management of trauma patients: a preliminary assessment.

This study evaluated the role and advantages of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) compared with diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in 75 trauma patients who were prospectively studied with DL followed by DPL. Of these, 59 patients had blunt injuries and 16 stab wounds. Seventy patients (93%) had the procedures performed in the emergency department (ED); 41 (59%) of these were awake and under local anesthesia. Forty-two patients had negative DPL and DL results with no subsequent sequelae. Twenty-three patients had negative DPL results and abnormal DL results. Of these, 20 were managed nonsurgically, and three (DPL < 10,000 RBC) underwent surgery based solely on DL findings of diaphragmatic lacerations from stab wounds. These were repaired. All 23 had an uneventful course. Three patients had positive DPL and insignificant DL findings. Laparotomy and DL findings correlated. A splenectomy for iatrogenic injury unrelated to DL and two nontherapeutic laparotomies were performed. Seven patients demonstrated both positive DPL and significant DL findings, and all had therapeutic laparotomies. Management based on DL rather than DPL would potentially have improved care in 8% of cases (6 of 75). Reliance on DL improved care in 19% (3 of 16) of patients with stab wounds and possibly could have in 3% (2 of 59) of those with blunt injuries. Management using DL would have potentially improved care in 30% (3 of 10) of patients with positive DPL findings and 5% (3 of 65) with negative DPL findings. Diagnostic laparoscopy can be performed safely in stable patients under local anesthesia in the ED. It offers no advantage over DPL as a primary assessment tool in blunt trauma. It does have advantages in the management of stab wounds. Diagnostic laparoscopy has a role in redefining DPL criteria for laparotomy and, in selected patients, as an adjunct to DPL, allowing further diagnosis and potentially the treatment of injuries without laparotomy.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2001

A new approach to extraperitoneal rectal injuries: laparoscopy and diverting loop sigmoid colostomy.

BACKGROUND: Current management of extraperitoneal rectal injuries involves a laparotomy and diversion of the fecal stream. In this study, we review our experience with laparoscopy and diverting loop sigmoid colostomy without laparotomy in the management of these injuries. METHODS: All patients admitted to the trauma unit at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 1995 and May 2000 with a rectal injury were evaluated. The presence of a rectal injury was confirmed by rectal examination and proctosigmoidoscopy. Intraperitoneal injuries were excluded by laparoscopy. Only patients who did not have intraperitoneal injuries were included in the study. The patients were then managed with a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy created through an abdominal wall trephine without laparotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the study. In eight patients, laparoscopy excluded intraperitoneal injuries. All 10 patients had a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy fashioned. There were no complications related to either the rectal injury or colostomy. Nine stomas have since been closed. CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, laparoscopic exclusion of intraperitoneal injuries, followed by a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy, is a feasible option.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

Indications, contraindications and complications of laparoscopy.

The primary use of laparoscopy is as a surgical tool, with sterilizations being the overwhelming indication. The laparoscope is used less frequently as a non-surgical tool, with the major indication being for diagnosing infertility and/or amenorrhea, and for evaluation of obscure pelvic pain. There would seem to be several indications for laparoscopy that have been neglected, these being in confirming the diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease; in the evaluation of malignancies and abdominal-pelvic trauma; and the surgical treatment of pelvic pain. Lapar-The majority of these contraindications are relative, and depend soley on the laparoscopist's ability and his clinical judgment. The problems of hernias seem to have been over-emphasized. The laparoscopist should be aware of potential problems with umbilical hernia, and he probably can ignore hiatal hernias except when they are large and quite symptomatic. However, generalized abdominal peritonitis, significant hemoperitoneum with intestinal obstruction are felt by most authors to be absolute contraindications. The most frequent complications of laparoscopy involve the physoperitoneum. Except for cardiac arrest the most serious complications involve electrical burns to small bowel.

Accident Prevention↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Etiology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease proven by laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have investigated the etiology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in laparoscopy-proven cases using pelvic samples for culture. Most of these studies were conducted in North America and Scandinavia. GOAL OF THE STUDY: To study the microbial etiology of laparoscopy-proven acute pelvic inflammatory disease in Israeli women. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective survey of women admitted to a hospital for treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. All diagnoses were laparoscopy confirmed. Specimens for culture were obtained from the pelvic cavity via the laparoscope, and two serum samples were sent for serologic studies. RESULTS: Forty patients were studied. Their mean age was 34.4 years of age, and 27.5% had a history of PID. Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed in 14 (35%) patients (group A). Facultative and/or anaerobic bacteria were isolated from pelvic specimens of 7 (17.5%) patients (group B), one of these patients also had positive chlamydial serology. Mycoplasma hominis was cultured from a pelvic specimen of one woman, and herpes simplex virus grew from a pelvic sample of another patient in whom C. trachomatis was also found. In 19 (47.5%) women, the microbial etiology could not be determined (group C). In no case was Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated. Stage I (mild) PID was diagnosed most often in group A (75% vs. 14% in group B [P < 0.02]), whereas the opposite was true for stage III (severe) PID (71.4% in group B vs 25% in group A [P = 0.07]). Tubal abscess was mainly diagnosed in group B patients (57% vs 16.6% in group A [P = 0.09]). CONCLUSION: In Israel, C. trachomatis is the most common cause of PID, while gonococci are rarely involved in this infection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1978

Tubal patency: hysterosalpingography compared with laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy was done about three months after hysterosalpingography (HSG) in 121 patients complaining of infertility. Normal patency was found with both technics in 71 patients (58.6%). In 23 of the 97 patients with a normal HSG, however, peritubal or tubal disease was observed at the time of laparoscopy (false-negative results, 19%). Twenty-four tubal obstructions (19.8%) were detected by HSG (16 distal and eight proximal) but five distal and four proximal obstructions were not confirmed by laparoscopy (false-positive results, 7.4%). In addition, laparoscopic evaluation demonstrated endometriosis in 31 cases, polycystic ovaries in six, and uterine fibroids in five.

Adnexal Diseases↗
PubMed1993

Staging ovarian cancer diagnosed during laparoscopy: accuracy rather than immediacy.

Immediate staging and debulking of an unsuspected ovarian malignancy detected at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy is appropriate when personnel knowledgeable in these procedures are available. However, when assistance is unavailable, termination of the diagnostic laparoscopy and timely referral is acceptable. This report reviews techniques to preoperatively distinguish a benign from a malignant adnexal mass, steps to evaluate an adnexal mass during laparoscopy, and ovarian cancer staging procedures.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1993

Laparoscopy and thoracostomy in children.

The laparoscopic and thoracoscopic revolution is sweeping through pediatric surgery. The current literature has detailed numerous reports of laparoscopic approaches to traditional operations. The most commonly performed and currently most accepted operations are diagnostic laparoscopy, gynecologic laparoscopy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Few, if any, of these procedures have been subjected to a prospective, randomized trial, but initial reports indicate improved postoperative outcome by decreasing hospital stay and an earlier return to normal activities. Thoracoscopic lung biopsy, tumor excision, and treatment of empyema are well-established procedures. Other operations soon to be introduced are laparoscopic fundoplication, laparoscopic-aided intestinal surgery, thoracoscopic excision of mediastinal masses, spinal surgery, and chest wall surgery. The early enthusiasm for minimally invasive surgery must be tempered by an appreciation for its limitations and complications. How surgeons handle this new innovation will determine whether the promise of laparoscopy is another step towards eliminating the negative factors that have made surgery such a dichotomy of fear and hope.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed1998

Diagnostic laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy has been shown to be a safe and effective method to establish or rule out a diagnosis in difficult clinical situations and, in selected cases, provide minimally invasive access for therapeutic procedures. Relevant indications for diagnostic laparoscopy in the pediatric population include evaluation of a contralateral patent processus vaginalis in a child with a known unilateral inguinal hernia, an impalpable testis, acute and chronic abdominal pain, staging in cancer, and evaluation of traumatic injuries. Selected articles concerning these and other uses of diagnostic laparoscopy published between December 1996 and November 1997 are the subject of this review.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

Staging of gastric cancer: a study with spiral computed tomography, ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography.

In this study, we evaluated and compared the value of spiral computed tomography, transabdominal ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography in staging gastric cancer in 37 patients; there was a special interest in the additional information provided by laparoscopic ultrasonography. Although laparoscopy was unreliable or hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients, the benefit of laparoscopy for staging was evident especially for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis that was missed by the other diagnostic modalities. Laparoscopic ultrasonography did not change the stage of the disease nor the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy for any of the patients. The decision whether to proceed with laparotomy was correctly predicted in 95% of the cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopy is useful in the diagnosis and management of foramen of Morgagni hernia in children.

Foramen of Morgagni hernia is a rare form of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. We report the use of laparoscopy to diagnose and manage suspected foramen of Morgagni hernias in children. Cardiophrenic masses were seen on chest radiography in two asymptomatic children aged 1 and 3 years. Further radiologic workup was nondiagnostic. Laparoscopy was performed in both children, and the foramen of Morgagni hernias were immediately identified. Laparoscopic repair was performed on one of the children. Both children had uneventful postoperative courses, were discharged home early, and had no evidence of recurrence at the 6-month follow-up examination. Laparoscopy is a safe and effective technique to diagnose and potentially repair foramen of Morgagni hernias. We recommend the use of this modality as the primary diagnostic evaluation in infants and children with suspected foramen of Morgagni hernias.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2003

Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in managing acute mesenteric venous thrombosis.

We describe two cases with acute mesenteric venous thrombosis in which diagnostic laparoscopy helped to diagnose the possible bowel infarction. These patients presented with abdominal pain out of proportion to physical findings, and computed tomography demonstrated thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein. Anticoagulation with heparin followed by diagnostic laparoscopy was done immediately after the diagnosis was established. According to the laparoscopic findings, one was managed with full anticoagulation without laparotomy and the other was managed with full anticoagulation and surgical resection. Considering that delay in diagnosis and surgical exploration is still frequent and is a significant contributory factor to the reported high mortality rate, diagnostic laparoscopy in an early position in the management algorithm for acute mesenteric venous thrombosis can furnish a rapid precise diagnosis of bowel infarction. It can also reduce the unnecessary laparotomies in these difficult cases.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Elective laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction.

We performed elective laparoscopic adhesiolysis in 21 patients with small bowel obstruction. The procedure was completely laparoscopic or laparoscopy assisted in 17 patients, but 4 patients required full laparotomy due to internal hernia in 2, perforation of the small bowel associated with dense adhesions in 1, and carcinoma of the cecum in 1. In patients with a laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted procedure, the mean operating time, mean time until the return of bowel function, and mean postoperative stay were 94 minutes, 3.3 days, and 9.9 days, respectively. During follow-up for 14 to 44 months, 3 patients developed recurrent obstruction, 1 patient suffered from catheter-induced thrombosis, and 1 patient died from lung cancer. Elective laparoscopy can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients with intermittent small bowel obstruction.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The physiologic effects of laparoscopy: applications in oncology.

The use of laparoscopic approaches to surgical disease continues to advance quickly. Laparoscopy applied to oncologic surgery continues to be debated. We review the experience of laparoscopy as it relates to surgery for tumors. Specifically, we discuss the physiologic changes and tumor response to laparoscopy, as well as the current concepts explaining port site recurrence.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Humidified compared with dry, heated carbon dioxide at laparoscopy to reduce pain.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether using 95% humidified, heated carbon dioxide (CO(2)) at laparoscopy reduces pain compared with dry, heated CO(2). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either heated, 95% humidified CO(2) (study group) or heated, dry CO(2) (control group) during laparoscopy. Pain control was achieved per standard protocols. Pain scales were administered the first 4 hours and 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The 89 patients available in the intent-to-treat model revealed a decrease in total morphine equivalents and a decrease in pain scores at 1, 2, and 24 hours in the study group (directional P values < .05). Subgroup analysis in patients without chronic pelvic pain revealed lower mean pain scores at 1, 2, 24, and 48 hours and decreases in postoperative and total morphine equivalents (directional P values < .05) in the study group. CONCLUSION: At laparoscopy, heated, 95% humidified CO(2) effectively decreases postoperative pain and narcotics usage compared with heated, dry CO(2). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Recognition and prevention of gastric injury during gynecologic laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has become an essential tool for the gynecologist. Its use has dramatically increased, in part, because of technological advances, but also because of well-documented advantages over laparotomy in particular scenarios. Immediate recognition of a complication is essential for reducing morbidity and potential mortality. We report an inadvertent gastric injury during a diagnostic laparoscopy. CASE: A 36-year-old woman sustained a gastric perforation during the insertion of an umbilical 5-mm trocar. After the injury was recognized, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, and primary repair of the defect was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery. CONCLUSION: Gastric injury is a rare complication of gynecologic laparoscopy. Identification of risk factors, the use of a nasogastric or orogastric tube to relieve any gastric dilatation before initiation of the procedure, and proper surgical technique may minimize such injuries.

Adult↗