Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources

Validation of a food frequency questionnaire by direct measurement of habitual ad libitum food intake.

Food frequency questionnaires are commonly used to assess habitual food intake. Although food frequency questionnaires are known to produce measurement error, the amount of error and effectiveness of correction methods are poorly understood. Twelve men from the Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC, area consumed an ad libitum diet for 16 weeks during the spring of 2001. At the end of the study period, subjects reported their food intakes with a food frequency questionnaire (Block 98). During weeks 8 and 16, subjects were dosed with doubly labeled water and maintained physical activity logs. Absolute and relative macronutrient intakes were poorly predicted by the food frequency questionnaire. The application of a single, group mean energy adjustment (using doubly labeled water or physical activity) reduced the variance of carbohydrate intake and increased the variance of fat and protein intakes, but none significantly (p>0.05). Subject-specific energy adjustments reduced the variance for carbohydrate and protein intakes (p<0.05). Including a body weight adjustment reduced the variance in fat intake (p<0.05) when doubly labeled water was used to first correct energy intake. The application of correction methods based on energy expenditure and body weight can be used to reduce measurement error, improving the ability of the food frequency questionnaire to measure food intake.

Adult↗

Invited commentary: the art of making questionnaires better.

A paper by Schilling et al. (Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:1141-4) addresses a crucial issue for epidemiologists: limited peer access to questionnaires. This limited access hampers the ability to evaluate and improve the questions used by investigators and, in turn, the quality of some of the self-reported data. The authors of this commentary analyzed recent publications in core epidemiology journals, finding that self-reported data were used in 64% of articles, but key questions were seldom printed in the article (9%), and open access to complete questionnaires (16%) was rarely provided. Only 47% of articles even discussed validation; of these, only 67% actually validated questions used in the study. The authors join Schilling et al. in making recommendations to improve questionnaire access and collaboration. A first step, proposed before, involves investigators posting their questionnaires on a website concurrently with publication of their article. Journal editors should require online access to full questionnaires for published articles and inclusion of key questions within the article when possible. Funding agencies should take the lead in increasing access and collaboration by developing a searchable database.

Access to Information↗

Patterns of alcohol drinking in a population of young social drinkers: a comparison of questionnaire and diary measures.

Studies of alcohol use often depend on self-reported alcohol intake measured by quantity/frequency questionnaires. Previous research has shown that alcohol consumption may be underestimated by this type of retrospective questionnaire. The primary aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of an Alcohol Use Questionnaire (AUQ) with a 4-week diary account. A further aim was to explore patterns of drinking in young social drinkers, with particular attention to binge drinking, which has been suggested as a factor in increasing the risk of alcohol dependency. University students completed the AUQ in the laboratory. They were then asked to keep a record of their alcohol, nicotine and caffeine consumption over a 4-week period (diary). The questionnaire and the diaries were compared on factors of alcohol intake (units per week) and patterns of drinking behaviour (speed of drinking, number of times being drunk and percentage of times getting drunk when drinking). The two measures (AUQ and diary) were highly correlated on alcohol consumption and the other questions relating to drinking behaviour. However, differences were found between the two measures on alcohol intake, speed of drinking (drinks per hour) and number of times being drunk. Alcohol consumption was underestimated by approximately 12% on the questionnaire, and, when the accuracy of estimation of drinking habits was examined, it was found that high drinkers tended to underestimate their drinking behaviour, whereas lower drinkers tended to overestimate. The results suggest that the AUQ can be used with a reasonable degree of confidence, bearing in mind the tendency for high drinkers to underestimate consumption and drinking behaviour. Relationships between 'binge scores', beverage specificity and alcohol consumption support the idea that the criteria for binge drinkers should be based on patterns of drinking rather than alcohol consumption.

Adolescent↗

Assessing motivation for change in subjects with alcohol problems: the MAC2-A questionnaire.

AIMS: This article presents the validation study of a questionnaire (MAC2-A), created to assess motivation for change in Italian adult subjects with alcohol related problems who require or are referred for assessment and treatment. The questionnaire evaluates readiness to change (RTC), self-efficacy and discrepancy. METHODS: The questionnaire was validated on 419 subjects referred to 23 health agencies in Italy. RESULTS: The questionnaire showed good internal consistency and temporal stability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirms the consistency with the theoretical assumptions. Test-retest showed high reliability on all scales except one. Visual analogue control scales used for reliability and concurrent validity yielded strong correlations with the corresponding variables. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the validity of the instrument, and its consistency with the model. The MAC2-A questionnaire is the first psychometric instrument integrating three factors (discrepancy, self-efficacy, RTC) into a 3D model of motivation for change.

Adult↗

A randomized controlled trial to assess the psychological impact of a family history screening questionnaire in general practice.

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that systematic enquiry about patients' family histories of inherited illnesses would lead to a population of 'worried well'. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate if the use of a family history screening questionnaire (FHSQ) as part of a general practice health check leads to psychological distress. METHOD: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a self-administered FHSQ in a single general practice. Individuals who had not had a health check within the previous 2 years were randomized within three age group strata to intervention group (receiving health check and FHSQ) or control group (only receiving health check). A total of 156 patients were offered health checks; 100 accepted and 76 of them were followed through to the 3-month end point. Responses to the six-item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Perception of Health questionnaire and Family History Concern questionnaire were compared between intervention and control groups. RESULTS: A two-way analysis of variance on the STAI scores 1 and 2 weeks after the health check with baseline scores as a covariate showed that at both times anxiety was higher in the intervention group than in the controls (F = 6.4; d.f. = 1,73; P = 0.014). Three months later, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The Perception of Health questionnaire only showed a significant result at 1 week, the intervention group having a more pessimistic response to the question eliciting patient's concerns about future health (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Short-term psychological distress due to the family history screening questionnaire was identified but did not persist.

Adult↗

Erectile dysfunction--the effect of sending a questionnaire to patients on consultations with their family doctor.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common problem among male adults that generally has been ignored by family practitioners. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effect of a mailed questionnaire about ED on the readiness of patients to raise the subject with their family doctor. METHODS: The study population included all men aged 40 years and over on the patient list of a family practitioner. A control group made up of males of similar ages was chosen in another family practice. The patient files were reviewed for ED. Anonymous questionnaires including questions about sexual dysfunction and satisfaction with sex life, as well as demographic and medical details, were sent to the study population. Patients who suffered from ED were invited to visit their family doctor. In the following 2 months, the study and control group populations' visits to the family practitioner were monitored for complaints of sexual dysfunction. RESULTS: In the 2 years prior to the study, 14/205 (6.8%) of the study population had complained to their family practitioner of ED in comparison with 6/205 (2.9%) in the control group (P = NS). In the 2 months following the sending of the questionnaire, 23 patients consulted their family practitioner with ED, 19 of whom had not discussed their problem with the family practitioner previously; only a further two patients went to discuss ED in the same period in the control group (P < 0.001). A total of 85/205 (41.5%) patients returned the questionnaire and 35/85 (42.5%) said they suffered from ED. Of 35 patients who reported ED, 15 had been for a consultation; only six of them consulted their family doctor. CONCLUSION: ED is reported infrequently to family doctors. Sending an anonymous questionnaire on the subject increases awareness of the problem and in turn increases the number of cases that can be treated.

Aged↗

The influence of age, relative weight, smoking, and alcohol intake on the reproducibility of a dietary questionnaire.

To evaluate factors that affect the reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire used in a large prospective study we compared an extended 99-item questionnaire with a shorter, 61-item form completed by 1497 women with an interval of nine months between. Correlation coefficients for individual items assessed by the two questionnaires were highest for beverages (Spearman r = 0.70). For other foods, coefficients ranged from 0.60 to 0.70 for items eaten frequently (or habitually), to values between 0.34 and 0.45 for foods, such as sweet potatoes and ready made pie, that were eaten less frequently. For food items, the correlation between mean frequency of consumption and the reproducibility coefficient (Spearman r) was 0.51 (p less than 0.01), formally confirming that the reproducibility of measurements was positively associated with frequency of use. Pearson correlation coefficients for calorie-adjusted intakes of nutrients between the two questionnaires ranged from 0.40 for trans-fatty acids to 0.71 for vitamin E (including supplements). These correlation coefficients did not vary materially between subjects in different categories of smoking status or tertiles of age or relative weight. Moderate alcohol use had minimal effect on correlation coefficients, but reproducibility was slightly reduced among heavier drinkers. These data indicate that this self-administered dietary questionnaire can provide reproducible information about individual food and nutrient intakes which is not altered materially by age and a number of important health habits.

Adult↗

Using the WHO (Rose) angina questionnaire in cardiovascular epidemiology.

During 1978-80, 7735 men aged 40-59 took part in a screening examination which included an administered version of the WHO (Rose) questionnaire on chest pain. Those men who had 'possible' angina were as likely to have an ischaemic electrocardiogram at rest as those with 'definite' angina. Furthermore, the heart attack rate over 7.5 years was similar in men with 'definite' and 'possible' angina and did not diminish with length of follow-up. Five years after the initial screening 98% of the surviving men replied to a postal questionnaire which included a self-administered version of the chest pain questionnaire. Age-specific prevalence rates of angina based on the administered questionnaire at screening and on the self-administered postal version five years later, were similar. Men who had angina ('definite' or 'possible') on both occasions had the highest prevalence rate of ischaemic electrocardiograms, men who were positive on only one occasion had intermediate rates and those who were negative on both occasions had the lowest rates. We conclude that in cardiovascular studies of middle-aged men which use the WHO (Rose) questionnaire for the purposes of determining prevalence or assessing risk of a heart attack, angina should include both 'possible' and 'definite' angina.

Adult↗

Validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire developed in Denmark.

In 1989, a self-administered food frequency questionnaire, including 92 food items and 40 portion-size photographs, was validated against two times seven days of weighed diet records. A total of 144 subjects, aged 40-64 years, from the general population in Copenhagen were included. Correlations between mean calorie-adjusted intakes from the two-week diet records and the food-frequency questionnaire ranged from 0.27 for vitamin A to 0.71 for calcium. In general, higher correlation coefficients were observed for men than for women. On average, about 70% of subjects were classified in the same (+/- 1) quintile in the food frequency questionnaire and the diet records. Of those subjects belonging to the lowest quintile, estimated from the diet records, 42% fell in the same quintile and 68% into the lowest two quintiles in the food frequency questionnaire. Findings were similar for the upper tail of the distribution. Gross misclassification, observed in the highest and lowest quintile, was found for 4% and 7% of the subjects, respectively. It is concluded that this food frequency questionnaire is a useful instrument for categorizing individuals according to their intake of nutrients and energy.

Adult↗

Reproducibility of a questionnaire on risk factors for osteoporosis in a multicentre prevalence survey: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study.

BACKGROUND: The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group (EVOS) developed a questionnaire, back translated into 14 different European languages, for use in a multinational epidemiological study of vertebral osteoporosis. We investigated the reproducibility of this questionnaire in four of the participating study centres. METHODS: In all 151 men and women, aged 50-85 years, from Lubeck (Germany), Malmo (Sweden), Warsaw (Poland) and Oviedo (Northern Spain), were retested with the questionnaire on two occasions using a different observer within a 28-day period. RESULTS: Questions relating to personal or medical history were more reproducible than questions concerning subjective symptoms or aspects of lifestyle. The level of agreement for the non-ordinal categorical variables, as estimated by kappa, varied from 0.38 to 1.00 across the four centres. Agreement for the multicategory ordinal, mainly lifestyle, questions was in general poorer though improved when a weighted analysis was performed. For continuous data the 95% limits of agreement were narrow, and there was no evidence of bias between interviewers. There were no important differences in reproducibility across the four centres for either categorical or continuous data. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that the questionnaire may produce useful and comparable information concerning risk factors for osteoporosis across different countries and in different languages. It also highlights that questionnaire instruments designed for use in multinational population-based studies may provide data of comparable quality across a range of settings.

Aged↗

Validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke questionnaire on physical activity.

BACKGROUND: In a pilot study for the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) a modification of the Baecke questionnaire on physical activity was tested for repeatability and relative validity in a population of 134 men and women aged 20-70 years. METHODS: For the assessment of repeatability Pearson's correlation coefficients and percentages of agreement after classification in tertiles were computed between administrations of the questionnaire at baseline, and after 5 and 11 months. Relative validity was determined by comparing the questionnaire to a four times repeated 3-day activity diary. RESULTS: Repeatability after 5 and 11 months was good, with test-retest correlation coefficients between 0.65 and 0.89 for main sections of the questionnaire. The percentages of agreement, exceeding chance (Cohen's kappa) were 57% and 56% for men (at 5 and 11 months respectively) and 41% and 46% for women. The correlations with the diaries were 0.56 in men and 0.44 in women. Agreement apart from chance between classification in tertiles for both methods was 35% for men and 10% for women. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that repeatability is good and relative validity as compared to an activity diary is moderate but well within the range of values found in other studies. The questionnaire is more valid in men than in women.

Adult↗

Reproducibility and relative validity of an extensive semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire using dietary records and biochemical markers among Greek schoolteachers.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the reproducibility and relative validity of a 190-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to be used in a large prospective study in the Athens area of Greece. METHODS: In all, 42 men and 38 women, aged 25-67 years, completed two self-administered semi-quantitative FFQ spaced approximately 1 year apart. Within this 1-year interval, participants visited the study centre monthly and completed an interviewer-administered 24-hour diet recall questionnaire. We also collected two venous blood and three 24-hour urine samples from participants at randomly selected periods during the year between the two administrations of the dietary questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean values for intake of most nutrients assessed by the two FFQ were in good agreement while those assessed by the two different dietary methods were reasonably similar for most nutrients. Intraclass correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted nutrient intakes assessed by questionnaires one year apart averaged 0.57 (range 0.24-0.75) and were not substantially different between genders. Correlation coefficients between the energy-adjusted nutrients measured by repeated 24-hour recalls and the semi-quantitative FFQ ranged from 0.25 for beta-carotene and polyunsaturated fats to > 0.50 for saturated fats, cis-linoleic acid, calcium and phosphorus (average: 0.46 for men and 0.39 for women). Reliability and relative validity were very high for alcohol intake. Dietary intakes from the FFQ were significantly correlated to plasma levels of vitamin C, but not beta-carotene or cholesterol. Dietary protein intake assessed by both FFQ was correlated (0.36, 0.30) with average urinary nitrogen excretion levels from three 24-hour urine samples. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the semi-quantitative FFQ is reproducible and provides a reasonably reliable measure of intake. Significant correlations between diet and an independent biochemical marker further corroborate the relative validity of our questionnaire in this Greek population.

Adult↗

The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. II. Relative validity and reproducibility for nutrients.

BACKGROUND: A self-administered semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed for the Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). METHODS: The reproducibility and relative validity of nutrient intake as assessed by this questionnaire were investigated in a population of 121 men and women. To assess the relative validity, 12 monthly 24-hour recalls served as reference method, together with four determinations of 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion, predicted basal metabolic rate, and serum beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol levels. RESULTS: Protein and among women, energy intake were underestimated by the questionnaire compared to urinary nitrogen excretion and the basal metabolic rate, respectively. The underestimation for protein decreased with increasing protein intake. Pearson correlation coefficients between nutrient intakes assessed by repeated questionnaires ranged from 0.70 to 0.94 among men and from 0.59 to 0.94 among women. Correlation coefficients between nutrient intakes assessed by the questionnaire and 24-hour recalls ranged from 0.26 to 0.83 for men and from 0.35 to 0.90 for women, with medians of 0.59 and 0.58, respectively. Correlation coefficients between 0.2 and 0.5 were observed for beta-carotene and vitamin C for men and for beta-carotene and vitamin E for women. Associations with serum beta-carotene (r = -0.16 for men; 0.13 for women) and alpha-tocopherol (0.23 and 0.15, respectively) were much poorer than those obtained with 24-hour recalls. Correlations between protein intake and 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion were 0.47 and 0.53, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FFQ seems adequate for ranking subjects according to intake of energy, macronutrients, dietary fibre and retinol, but it does not yield such good results for beta-carotene, vitamin C for men, vitamin E for women.

Adult↗

Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is an important lifestyle which is often poorly assessed in epidemiological studies. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer Study-Norfolk cohort (EPIC-Norfolk), a large population-based cohort study, has developed a comprehensive questionnaire to assess activity in different domains of life aimed at assessing total energy expenditure. We report the repeatability of this instrument and its validity against repeated objective measures of fitness and energy expenditure undertaken throughout the time frame of reference of the questionnaire. METHODS: The validity of the instrument was measured in 173 individuals randomly selected from a continuing population-based cohort study. Energy expenditure was assessed by four separate episodes of 4-day heart-rate monitoring, a method previously validated against whole body calorimetry and doubly-labelled water. Cardio-respiratory fitness was assessed by four repeated measures of sub-maximum oxygen uptake. At the end of the 12-month period, participants completed the physical activity questionnaire that assesses past-year activity at home, work and in recreation. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of 399 randomly selected participants in EPIC who completed the physical activity questionnaire twice with a 3-month interval. RESULTS: The age- and sex-adjusted correlation between the objective measure of daytime energy expenditure and the sum of recreational and occupational reported physical activity (in MET h per week) was 0.28 (P < 0.001). The reported time spent in vigorous activity was correlated with cardio-respiratory fitness (0.16, P < 0.05) and with the proportion of time when energy expenditure was more than five times basal (0.17, P < 0.05). The repeatability of the sum of recreational and occupational reported activity was high, r = 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: The indices of physical activity derived from this questionnaire have levels of validity and repeatability comparable to other physical activity instruments that are used in large epidemiological studies and which have undergone such intense development and testing.

Aged↗

The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a core set of questions to measure patients' experiences of in-patient care. Questions were selected from the bank of items developed for use in in-patient surveys undertaken by the Picker Institute for the purposes of assessing the quality of care. DESIGN: The data reported here come from surveys of patients who had attended acute care hospitals in five countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA. Questionnaires were mailed to patients' homes within 1 month of discharge, either to all patients, or to a random sample, discharged during a specified period. SAMPLE: A total of 62 925 questionnaires were returned, with response rates of 65% (UK), 74% (Germany), 63% (Sweden), 52% (Switzerland), and 46% (USA). RESULTS: Fifteen items were selected from the bank of questions included in the Picker in-patient questionnaires. These items have a high degree of face validity and when summed to an index they show a high degree of construct validity and internal reliability consistency. DISCUSSION: Fifteen items derived from the longer form Picker in-patient survey have been found to provide a meaningful picture of patient experiences of health care, and constitute the 15-item Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire. These questions comprise a core set that should be measured in all in-patient facility surveys. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire represents a step forward in the measurement of patient experience as it provides a core set of questions around which further optional modules may be added. Scores are easy to interpret and actionable. CONCLUSION: This small set of questions could be incorporated into in-patient surveys in different settings, enabling the comparison of hospital performance and the establishment of national or international benchmarks.

Europe↗

Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a psychometrically sound, hospital patient satisfaction questionnaire to be administered to patients discharged from medical and surgical services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey in Spanish. SETTING: Four acute care general hospitals of the Basque Health Service. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Random samples of 650 discharged patients from each hospital during February and March 2002. A total of 1910 patients responded to the questionnaire (73.5%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall perceived quality of health care and perceived health improvement. RESULTS: No sociodemographic differences were found between respondents and non-respondents. Six dimensions were identified from the factor analysis, explaining 50% of the variance. All items, except two, revealed loadings above 0.4. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.7 for all dimensions, except privacy. Comfort was the dimension with the lowest level of patient satisfaction, whereas privacy was the most satisfactory. The interscale correlations never exceeded the internal consistency of each scale. The analysis of the dimensions with two items of global assessment showed a positive correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained from the development and validation of the questionnaire provide evidence of its psychometric properties, although it would be useful to carry out further analyses to assess time-based properties of reliability. We found a positive relation between the degree of patient satisfaction and overall evaluation of the quality of health care, providing evidence of the ability of the questionnaire to correlate with other concepts. The in-patient satisfaction questionnaire could become a useful instrument in quality-of-care assessment.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

Quality-of-life assessment: patient compliance with questionnaire completion.

BACKGROUND: Previous investigators have found that compliance with quality-of-life data collection on cancer clinical trials is poor. There is general belief that collecting complete quality-of-life data is at present an unachievable goal. PURPOSE: We assessed the completeness of quality-of-life data collection on trials instituted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG), since incorporation of quality-of-life outcomes into trials became mandatory for the group. METHODS: Data from three NCIC CTG trials in which quality of life was a study end point were examined to determine the extent to which protocol specifications were met with respect to questionnaire completion. Two of the studies examined adjuvant therapies, and one examined anti-emetics. In two trials, the quality-of-life questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer was used; in the other, the Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patient compliance with questionnaire completion was unexpectedly high: More than 95% of the scheduled questionnaires were returned, and more than 99% of the questions were answered. CONCLUSIONS: We attribute this success to a comprehensive set of measures taken to enhance compliance on these studies. Which of these measures was most contributory requires further investigation, as does the issue of whether similar results can be obtained in other circumstances. IMPLICATIONS: It seems that the commonly held belief that quality-of-life data cannot be successfully collected in multicenter cancer trials is incorrect.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Identifying workers at risk of sickness absence by questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Sickness absence is an important economic problem, because of high costs and lost productivity. Determining factors associated with increased risk of sickness absence may lead to the development of preventive measures. AIMS: To determine whether self-report questionnaires can identify those employees at risk of sickness absence METHODS: Prospective study of 238 healthy administrative workers. Participants completed a questionnaire proven to be valid and consistent. The questionnaire consisted of 116 items about health, work and working conditions. Sickness absence was followed-up for a period of 1 year. RESULTS: The questionnaires of 191 workers (80%) were suitable for analysis. The number of reported health complaints was significantly (P < 0.01) associated with sickness absence (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.32-3.61). Concentration problems were correlated with more frequent absences, and both nervous complaints and coping problems with longer duration. Age (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; P = 0.02) and job insecurity (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.98; P = 0.04) were negatively associated with sickness absence. Psychosocial and physical work factors were not associated with sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires on health and work can identify employees at future risk of sickness absence. Workers who report multiple health complaints, especially concentration problems, nervous complaints or coping problems, may be at increased risk of sickness absence.

Absenteeism↗