Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROPIONATES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources

Enhancement of human eosinophil apoptosis by fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and beclomethasone.

Beclomethasone, budesonide, dexamethasone, and fluticasone propionate enhanced human eosinophil apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner in vitro as assessed by flow cytometric analysis and morphological analysis. The order of potency was fluticasone propionate (EC(50) 3.7+/-1.8 nM) approximately budesonide (EC(50) 5.0+/-1.7 nM)>beclomethasone (EC(50) 51+/-19 nM)>dexamethasone (EC(50) 303+/-40 nM). Hydrocortisone, prednisolone, and prednisone (up to 1 microM) did not induce any significant increase in eosinophil apoptosis. The apoptosis promoting effects of glucocorticoids on eosinophils were reversed by an antagonist of glucocorticoid receptor mifepristone. The survival-prolonging effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha was reversed by dexamethasone and fluticasone (1 microM). In contrast, fluticasone, and dexamethasone (1 microM) did not reverse the survival-prolonging effects of interleukins-3 and -5 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The results suggest that fluticasone and budesonide induce eosinophil apoptosis at clinically achievable drug concentrations via an effect on glucocorticoid receptor.

Androstadienes↗

Characterization of a new AMPA receptor radioligand, [3H]2-amino-3-(3-carboxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid.

(RS)-2-Amino-3-(3-carboxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (ACPA), which is a potent and selective agonist at (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptors, has previously been shown to desensitize AMPA receptors to a much lower degree than AMPA itself. We now report the synthesis of [3H]ACPA (32.5 Ci/mmol), the neurochemical and pharmacological characterization of [3H]ACPA binding, and a comparison of the distribution of [3H]ACPA, [3H]AMPA, and [3H](S)-5-fluorowillardiine binding sites in rat brain. Under equilibrium conditions, [3H]ACPA was shown to bind to a single population of receptor sites on rat brain membranes. [3H]ACPA was shown to bind with single and similar affinities (15-45 nM) to cloned AMPA receptor subunits (GluR1-4), expressed in insect cells, whereas a K(D) value of 330 nM was determined for the binding of [3H]ACPA to cloned kainic acid preferring GluR5 subunits. Whereas Bmax and K(D) values for [3H]ACPA binding, determined using filtration techniques, were different from such obtained in centrifugation assays, Bmax and K(D) values as well as association and dissociation constants were not significantly affected by the addition of the chaotropic agent KSCN. K(D) values, determined under equilibrium conditions, were, however, markedly different from K(D) values derived from kinetic data. Furthermore, the results of analyses of these kinetic data were consistent with the existence of two different populations of [3H]ACPA binding sites. The pharmacology of [3H]ACPA binding sites was characterized using a series of AMPA receptor agonists and antagonists. Whereas addition of KSCN had little effect on the affinities of AMPA receptor agonists for [3H]ACPA binding, this chaotropic agent reduced the affinities of AMPA receptor antagonists structurally related to AMPA. Based on these and previously reported data, the AMPA receptor agonists, ACPA, AMPA and (S)-5-fluorowillardiine, seem to bind to and activate AMPA receptors in a nonidentical fashion, and these three agonists together may be useful tools for studies of AMPA receptor mechanisms.

Animals↗

Studies of the behaviour and fate of the polymer-additives octadecyl-3-(3.5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate and tri-(2.4-di-t-butylphenyl)phosphite in the environment.

In order to evaluate the environmental risk potential of the polymer-additives octadecyl-3-(3.5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (additive 1) and tri-(2.4-di-t-butylphenyl)phosphite (additive 2) we have studied the degradation of the 14C-labelled single components and their release from a polypropylene matrix in abiotic and biotic test systems as well as their transport behaviour in soil. The biotic degradation in waste compost, activated sludge and in soil was studied. In order to conduct release tests, waste disposal material were used as well. The abiotic degradation was effectuated by photooxidation at a catalytic surface. The highest mineralisation rates were obtained by photooxidative degradation of the two test substances. The maximum content of bounded residues was found for additive 1 in soil and for additive 2 in waste compost. In the extracts of soil and compost, the principal metabolites could be identified in the case of additive 1 as 7.9-di-t-butyl-1-oxaspiro[4.5]deca-6.9-dien-2.8-dion and in activated sludge as the methyl ester of 3-(3.5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid. Additive 2 metabolised in all degradation tests nearly completely under formation of two products. The main component was identified as tri-(2.4-di-t-butylphenyl)phosphate. Both polymer-additives were eluated from the chosen soil types. The transport behaviour of additive 1 was independent from the soil type. In all test matrices additive 1 as well as additive 2 were released from polypropylene. Because the amounts of additive 1 and 2 absorbed onto soil particles were taken into account, the highest liberation rates were found in the soil test.

Antioxidants↗

Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Attempts to delineate efficacy and safety differences among inhaled corticosteroids have been difficult because of the lack of well-controlled, comparative studies reported in the medical literature. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted in 24 outpatient centers. A total of 291 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma (FEV1 between 50% and 80% of predicted value), who had previously received maintenance therapy with beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide, were switched to treatment with fluticasone propionate powder (250 microg twice daily), triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (200 microg four times daily), or placebo for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to end point was significantly (p = 0.009) greater in patients switched to treatment with fluticasone compared with patients switched to treatment with triamcinolone (0.27 L and 0.07 L, respectively). At end point, mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline was 21 L/min with fluticasone compared with mean decreases of 6 L/min and 28 L/min with triamcinolone and placebo, respectively (p < 0.001 vs triamcinolone and placebo). Supplemental rescue albuterol use decreased by 30% from baseline with fluticasone (p < 0.05 vs triamcinolone and placebo) compared with triamcinolone (6%) or placebo (increased by 50%). The percentage of patients withdrawn from the study because they met predefined lack-of-efficacy criteria was higher with placebo (60%) and triamcinolone (27%) than with fluticasone (17%). Incidence of adverse events and low morning plasma cortisol concentrations were similar across treatment groups except for oral candidiasis (p = 0.035, fluticasone vs placebo). CONCLUSION: Fluticasone propionate powder twice daily (500 microg/day) was superior in efficacy to triamcinolone acetonide aerosol four times daily (800 microg/day) in patients with persistent asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗

A comparison of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol spray and fluticasone propionate aqueous solution spray in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Many nasal corticosteroids with different potencies and formulations are available, but they have all been proven safe and effective. The clinical relevance, if any, of these differences is not yet completely established. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy, safety, and patients' acceptance of triamcinolone acetonide aerosol spray and fluticasone propionate aqueous solution in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis. METHODS: After a drug-free baseline evaluation, patients with rhinitis were randomized to receive either a triamcinolone aerosol spray of 110 microg in each nostril once daily (n = 117) or a fluticasone solution spray of 100 microg in each nostril once daily (n = 116) in a single-blind, parallel-group study. The Rhinitis Index Score (sum of scores of symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3) was evaluated daily, in the morning before drug administration, for 21 days. The efficacy of each treatment was assessed by the mean reduction from baseline in the Rhinitis Index Score and in individual symptom scores. Patients' acceptance of the study drugs was also monitored by a daily questionnaire. RESULTS: Reductions of the Rhinitis Index Score (mean +/- SEM) were 4.20 +/- 0.21 and 4.60 +/- 0.21 for triamcinolone and fluticasone, respectively (p = 0.23). There were no statistically significant differences between the drugs in the reduction of any of the individual symptoms. Patients expressed statistically significant differences between the drugs regarding acceptance; different properties of the aerosol and the solution were appreciated differently. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that triamcinolone acetonide aerosol and fluticasone propionate solution sprays are both clinically equally effective, safe, and well tolerated for the treatment of spring pollen allergic rhinitis.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray versus oral prednisone on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate is a glucocorticoid with negligible oral bioavailability and very low intranasal bioavailability that is used as an intranasal spray for the treatment of rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)axis effects of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FP ANS) compared with oral prednisone and placebo by using a 6-hour cosyntropin infusion test. METHODS: In a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled parallel-group study, 105 adult patients with allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive FP ANS 200 microg once daily, FP ANS 400 microg twice daily, oral prednisone 7.5 mg once daily, oral prednisone 15 mg once daily, or placebo. HPA-axis function was assessed at the screening visit and after 4 weeks of treatment by measuring morning plasma cortisol concentrations and poststimulation concentrations of plasma and urinary cortisol. RESULTS: There was no evidence of altered HPA-axis response to cosyntropin by the end of treatment with FP ANS 200 microg once daily or FP ANS 400 microg twice daily when compared with placebo. In contrast, 4 weeks of treatment with oral prednisone 7.5 or 15 mg once daily was associated with significant (p < 0.05 vs placebo) reduction in HPA-axis function, as evidenced by lower plasma cortisol concentrations (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and peak concentrations) after cosyntropin stimulation and reduced mean 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion. FP ANS 400 microg twice daily and both prednisone regimens were associated with a significant (p < 0.05 vs placebo) reduction in mean morning plasma cortisol concentrations. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that a 4-week course of FP ANS at four times the recommended dose does not suppress adrenal function in response to a 6-hour cosyntropin stimulation test.

Administration, Inhalation↗

A comparison of asthma-related expenditures for patients started on montelukast versus fluticasone propionate as monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of asthma is increasing, and this chronic condition imposes a substantial economic burden worldwide. It is not known whether newer therapies, such as leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), can ease this burden. OBJECTIVE: This analysis examined the association between choice of first-line asthma control therapy and health care resource utilization and expenditures in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of claims data for patients who started therapy with fluticasone propionate or montelukast between January 1, 1997, and February 28, 1999, was performed, adjusting for baseline differences. RESULTS: Data from 343 patients (229 fluticasone; 114 montelukast) were analyzed. Patients starting therapy with fluticasone were significantly older (33.3 vs 27.6 years; P = 0.015) and significantly less likely than patients starting therapy with montelukast to have been started on control therapy by an asthma specialist (52.0% vs 69.3%; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in mean changes in total asthma-related health care expenditures, oral steroid and antibiotic prescriptions, hospitalizations, or emergent care visits. The mean increase in total asthma-related pharmacy expenses was significantly greater for patients who were prescribed montelukast than for those prescribed fluticasone (P < 0.001). Treatment adherence was better in patients prescribed montelukast versus fluticasone (5.1 vs 3.1 prescriptions filled per year, respectively; P < 0.001). Montelukast patients had a significantly lower increase in the number of beta-agonist prescriptions filled per year than fluticasone patients (0.19 vs 0.66; P = 0.03). In the subsequent year, 4% (10/229) of fluticasone patients added or switched to an LTRA. No montelukast patients added to or switched control therapy. CONCLUSION: The mean change in total asthma-related health care expenditures was not significantly different in patients started on fluticasone propionate versus montelukast. Montelukast patients had better adherence to their treatment regimen and required fewer beta-agonist prescriptions, which is an indicator of asthma control and possibly therapeutic effectiveness.

Acetates↗

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream once daily versus clobetasone butyrate 0.05% cream twice daily in children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone propionate is a novel and potent corticosteroid. It seems to have an improved therapeutic index on the basis of studies on skin thinning and suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 0.05% cream once daily as compared with clobetasone butyrate (CB) 0.05% cream twice daily in children with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: Twenty-two children (3 to 8 years old) with moderately active AD received either FP once daily or CB twice daily. Severity of AD was scored weekly by means of the modified Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis system (SCORAD) and treatment was either stopped when skin lesions were almost cleared (SCORAD < 9) or after 4 weeks. Cortisol excretion was determined by means of 24-hour urine before and after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-one children completed the study. After 1 week of treatment, mean SCORAD significantly decreased in both treatment groups. After 2, 3, and 4 weeks cumulatively, 8, 12, and 16 children, respectively, were clinically healed (SCORAD < 9). No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the two treatments. Urinary cortisol excretion was not altered by either of the treatments. Two weeks after discontinuation of active treatment, mean SCORAD had increased to 22, but still was significantly lower than that at the beginning of the study. CONCLUSION: Once-daily treatment with FP is as safe and effective as twice-daily treatment with CB in children with AD. All children experienced an exacerbation of AD within 2 weeks after treatment was withdrawn, indicating the need for long-term "intermittent" treatment.

Administration, Topical↗

Adeno-associated virus mediated gene transfer into primary rat brain neuronal and glial cultures: enhancement with the pH-sensitive surfactant dodecyl 2-(1'-imidazolyl) propionate.

This study evaluated the effects of a novel, pH-sensitive surfactant, dodecyl 2-(1'-imidazolyl) propionate (DIP), on cationic lipid mediated transfection in primary rat brain neuronal and glial cultures. The cationic lipid complex DOTAP/DOPE (1, 2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propionate and dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine, respectively) was added over a range of concentrations (0-120 microg/ml) with DNA concentration kept constant (1.6 microg/ml). The neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoters were found to drive green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in neuron-enriched and glial cultures, respectively, using adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived constructs. NSE-driven GFP expression was not observed in glial cultures. Addition of DOTAP/DOPE increased transfection efficiency over a wide range of lipid concentrations (5-50 microg/ml) keeping DNA concentration constant (1.6 microg/ml). Addition of DIP to the lipid/DNA complex increased maximum transfection efficiencies in glial and neuronal cultures 2-3-fold. Transfection efficiencies were at their maximum with a similar total lipid concentration (50 microg/ml) in both cell-types in the presence of DIP. Neuronal cultures were more sensitive than glia to the toxic actions of DOTAP/DOPE, with or without DIP. These results indicate that AAV-mediated gene-transfer to neurons and glia can be facilitated by addition of a pH-sensitive surfactant to cationic liposome/DNA complexes and that endosomal escape could be a limiting factor in transgene expression.

Animals↗

Long-term increase of GluR2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate receptor subunit in the dispersed dentate gyrus after intrahippocampal kainate injection in the mouse.

Intrahippocampal injection of a subtoxic dose of kainate in mice has been shown to induce a dispersion of granule cells of the dentate gyrus, which is a characteristic morphological change often seen in human hippocampal sclerosis. In addition, it has been shown recently that such injections lead to recurrent hippocampal seizures and changes in glucose metabolism, which are reminiscent of temporal lobe epilepsy. Previous reports on human hippocampal sclerosis have shown an increase of the expression of the GluR2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate subunits in the dispersed granule cell somata. However, no such changes have been observed so far in animal models of epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. In this study, the expression of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate receptor subunits was examined by immunohistochemistry following intrahippocampal injection of kainate in mice and rats. In mice, such injection induced a persistent increase of GluR2 immunoreactivity in the granule cells for up to 180 days. By contrast, GluR1 immunoreactivity was transiently increased during the first four days after the injection and progressively decreased thereafter. By contrast, intrahippocampal injection of kainate in rats did not result in granule cell dispersion and no changes in GluR1 immunoreactivity or GluR2 immunoreactivity were observed. These results show that, in addition to morphological, clinical and metabolical similarities, intrahippocampal injection of kainate results in a persistent increase of GluR2 associated with granule cell dispersion, as in human hippocampal sclerosis. These data suggest the existence of common mechanisms between granule cell dispersion and regulation of GluR2 subunits associated with hippocampal sclerosis.

Animals↗

Determination of the glucocorticoid fluticasone propionate in plasma by automated solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A sensitive, robust and high throughput mass spectrometry based method is described for the determination of the glucocorticoid fluticasone propionate in plasma. The method employs solid-phase extraction in 96 well microtitre plate format which has been automated by means of a custom built Zymark robotic system. The extracts are analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using thermally and pneumatically assisted electrospray ionisation and selected reaction monitoring. The method is both accurate and precise with both intra- and inter-assay precision (C.V.) of less than <6%. The method provides a lower limit of quantification of 20 pg/ml from 0.5 ml of human plasma, sufficient to monitor systemic concentrations of inhaled fluticasone propionate at therapeutic doses.

Androstadienes↗

An improved method for the determination of fluticasone propionate in human plasma.

Therapeutic monitoring of the potent, highly lipophilic glucocorticoid, fluticasone propionate (FP), was initially performed by a radioimmunoassay method. However an improved method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of at least 25 pg per ml (pg/ml(-1)) was needed to measure the low levels of FP present in human plasma following inhalation administration of doses in the range 50-250 microg twice daily. A sensitive and specific liquid chromatographic, tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS) with automated solid phase extraction (SPE) was developed and validated. Fluticasone propionate was extracted from plasma using Bond Elut C18 cartridges and analysed using reverse-phase chromatography with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation followed by selective reaction monitoring. The method used a 13C-labelled internal standard and was validated over a concentration range of 25-500 pg/ml(-1). The method was shown to be specific, sensitive and reliable in the analysis of clinical samples. The main advantages of this method over the radioimmunoassay method previously used were improved sensitivity, specificity, ease of sample preparation and shortened analysis time.

Androstadienes↗

The effects of topical fluticasone propionate on allergen-induced immediate nasal airways response and eosinophil activation: preliminary results.

Nasal application of grass pollen allergen in atopic individuals with seasonal rhinitis leads to an early rise in nasal airways resistance. The effects of fluticasone propionate, a powerful, topically active glucocorticosteroid, on nasal airways resistance and cellular infiltration of the nasal mucous membrane were investigated. Fluticasone propionate blunted the rise in nasal airway resistance following allergen challenge (P = 0.089). Although this glucocorticosteroid did not affect the total number of eosinophils in biopsies of nasal mucous membrane, the number of activated eosinophils was significantly reduced (P less than 0.05).

Administration, Topical↗

Fluticasone propionate 1 mg daily and beclomethasone dipropionate 2 mg daily: a comparison over 1 yr.

This study was designed primarily to assess the safety and tolerability of fluticasone propionate (FP) 1 mg day-1 by comparison with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 2 mg day-1 over a 12-month study period. Lung function data were also recorded and used to determine whether the potency ratio between the two inhaled corticosteroids observed in previous studies was maintained in the long-term. Two hundred and thirteen patients with an established clinical history of severe chronic asthma and who were currently receiving between 1000 micrograms and 2000 micrograms day-1 of inhaled steroids were randomized to treatment in a ratio of 3:1 for FP:BDP (159 patients FP; 54 patients BDP), both via metered dose inhalers. Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar adverse event profile. No unexpected adverse events were recorded. Most adverse events were related to the patients' asthma, an intercurrent infection or underlying atopy. The incidence of pharmacologically predictable adverse events was equally low in both treatment groups as was the incidence of events suggestive of systemic steroid effect. Mean serum cortisol levels remained within the normal range at all visits for both treatments. At 12 months, however, the mean cortisol levels for the FP group had risen 4% above the baseline value but had dropped 15% below for the BDP group, giving a ratio of FP:BDP of 1.22; P = 0.01; 95% confidence limits (CL) 1.05-1.43. Fluticasone propionate 1 mg day-1 was at least as effective as BDP 2 mg day-1 in improving lung function (PEF, FEV1 and FVC) over this period. Moreover, the difference in FEV1 values at 6 months was significantly greater for the FP group than for the BDP group (P = 0.04; difference = 0.12 1; 95% CL = 0.01, 0.24 1). The difference between treatments in the amount of FEV1 reversibility was also significantly greater for FP at 12 months (difference in treatments = -3%; 95% CL = - 7-0%; P = 0.044). This study supports previous studies and suggests that FP is likely to be of benefit in the long-term treatment of chronic severe asthma.

Adolescent↗

Influence of a transscrotal testosterone propionate administration on the serum level of selected hormones of the hypophyso-gonadal axis.

This study was designed to examine the effect of a percutaneous scrotal administration of testosterone propionate (TP) on selected blood variables, in order to identify a reliable anti-doping probe liable to disclose the illicit use of testosterone. Twelve healthy adult males gave their informed consent for the study. Each morning (8:30) and for 10 consecutive days (D), a placebo (D:1,2,3,...8,9,10) or a testosterone propionate (200mg TP on D:... 4,5,6,7...) scrotal patch was installed. On D2 or D3 (placebo-treated) or D7 (TP-treated), venous blood samples were collected at 5 min intervals from 9:00 until 13:00. Serum LH, FSH, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17HP), testosterone (T), estradiol (E2) and SHBG contents were analysed by immunoassays. The high sampling frequency revealed that TP was associated with the complete abolition of serum LH pulses. Although statistically significant, TP treatment was not related to explicit changes in serum FSH, E2, T/E2 and T/SHBG. TP-induced effects were most significant on serum LH, T and 17HP and were most clearly illustrated by a bi-dimensional distribution plot of serum values of the latter variables. The expression of a combination of the latter parameters could eventually serve to detect testosterone misusers.

17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone↗

Comparison of the effects of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine on daytime alertness and performance in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Concern has been directed at the relative sedating properties of lipophilic and lipophobic antihistamines, but few studies have sought to determine the comparative benefit of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) treatments in controlling symptoms and consequently improving alertness. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative contributions of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine in enhancing daytime performance in 8- to 17-year-old children. METHODS: All participants had a documented history of SAR, positive response to a skin prick (wheal 3-mm greater than negative control or equal to the positive control) for seasonal aeroallergens, and clinically identifiable symptoms at the time of randomization. Following confirmation during baseline of current SAR symptoms, participants were randomized to 1 of the 2 treatments and returned 2 weeks later for evaluation of symptom control, quality of life, attention, reaction time, and memory. RESULTS: Children in the fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray group but not the loratadine group demonstrated improvement in nasal symptoms, nasal quality of life score, and composite verbal memory. No differences were identified on any scores from the Conners Continuous Performance Test. CONCLUSIONS: Treatments that most effectively control SAR symptoms are also likely to provide the greatest benefit to children whose daytime functioning, including their capacity to learn at school, is compromised by their illness.

Administration, Intranasal↗

The effect of a steroid "burst" and long-term, inhaled fluticasone propionate on adrenal reserve.

BACKGROUND: Although widely used, the effects of steroid "bursts" on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, especially with long-term, concomitant topical steroids use, have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a prednisone burst, long-term intranasal steroids, and inhaled fluticasone propionate on the suppression and recovery of adrenal function. METHODS: Adult patients taking long-term intranasal steroids, either moderate-dose (440 microg/d) or high-dose (880 microg/d) inhaled fluticasone propionate, underwent a low-dose cosyntropin stimulation test (LDCST) before and 2 days after a prednisone burst. Suppressed adrenal responses were monitored with a weekly LDCST. Persistent abnormal LDCST results were confirmed by 8-hour cosyntropin infusion. Inhaled fluticasone dosages were decreased; adrenal recovery was evaluated by a monthly LDCST. Adverse effects of steroids were monitored by questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients participated in the study. Three of 31 patients not taking inhaled steroids and 1 of 13 patients taking moderate-dose fluticasone had abnormal LDCST results on day 2 after the prednisone burst, which normalized by the second week. In the high-dose fluticasone group, 14 of 19 patients had suppressed LDCST responses on day 2 and adrenal function recovered in 10 of 19 patients by the fourth week. These patients complained significantly of decreased libido (P = 0.02), listlessness (P = 0.03), and weight loss (P = 0.05). High-dose fluticasone (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and duration of use (r = 0.32, P = 0.01) were statistically correlated with adrenal impairment. Of the 4 patients with persistent adrenal impairment, 3 patients successfully reduced dosages of inhaled fluticasone and adrenal function recovered in 2 to 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisone bursts induce brief adrenal impairment. Intranasal steroids and moderate-dose fluticasone had no effect on adrenal function. High-dose, inhaled fluticasone caused mild-to-significant adrenal suppression and delayed the recovery after a steroid burst. Avoiding or limiting the duration of high-dose inhaled steroids would minimize systemic adverse effects.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.

Androstadienes↗