Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HISTONES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources

Subcellular localization and nucleosome specificity of yeast histone acetyltransferases.

We have previously reported [López-Rodas et al. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19028-19033] that the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains four histone acetyltransferases, which can be resolved by ion-exchange chromatography, and their specificity toward yeast free histones was studied. In the present contribution we show that three of the enzymes are nuclear, type A histone acetyltransferases and they are able to acetylate nucleosome-bound histones. They differ in their histone specificity. Enzyme A1 acetylates H2A in chicken nucleosomes, although it is specific for yeast free H2B; histone acetyltransferase A2 is highly specific for H3, and histone acetyltransferase A3 preparations acetylate both H3 and H4 in nucleosomes. The fourth enzyme, which is located in the cytoplasm, does not accept nucleosomes as substrate, and it represents a canonical type B, H4-specific histone acetyltransferase. Finally, histone deacetylase activity is preferentially found in the nucleus.

Acetyltransferases↗

Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells.

Mutation of FMR1 results in fragile X mental retardation. The most common FMR1 mutation is expansion of a CGG repeat tract at the 5' end of FMR1, which leads to cytosine methylation and transcriptional silencing. Both DNA methylation and histone deacetylation have been associated with transcriptional inactivity. The finding that the methyl cytosine-binding protein MeCP2 binds to histone deacetylases and represses transcription in vivo supports a model in which MeCP2 recruits histone deacetylases to methylated DNA, resulting in histone deacetylation, chromatin condensation and transcriptional silencing. Here we demonstrate that the 5' end of FMR1 is associated with acetylated histones H3 and H4 in cells from normal individuals, but acetylation is reduced in cells from fragile X patients. Treatment of fragile X cells with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) resulted in reassociation of acetylated histones H3 and H4 with FMR1 and transcriptional reactivation, whereas treatment with trichostatin A (TSA) led to almost complete acetylated histone H4 and little acetylated histone H3 reassociation with FMR1, as well as no detectable transcription. Our results represent the first description of loss of histone acetylation at a specific locus in human disease, and advance understanding of the mechanism of FMR1 transcriptional silencing.

Acetylation↗

Targeted chromatin binding and histone acetylation in vivo by thyroid hormone receptor during amphibian development.

Amphibian metamorphosis is marked by dramatic, thyroid hormone (TH)-induced changes involving gene regulation by TH receptor (TR). It has been postulated that TR-mediated gene regulation involves chromatin remodeling. In the absence of ligand, TR can repress gene expression by recruiting a histone deacetylase complex, whereas liganded TR recruits a histone acetylase complex for gene activation. Earlier studies have led us to propose a dual function model for TR during development. In premetamorphic tadpoles, unliganded TR represses transcription involving histone deacetylation. During metamorphosis, endogenous TH allows TR to activate gene expression through histone acetylation. Here using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we directly demonstrate TR binding to TH response genes constitutively in vivo in premetamorphic tadpoles. We further show that TH treatment leads to histone deacetylase release from TH response gene promoters. Interestingly, in whole animals, changes in histone acetylation show little correlation with the expression of TH response genes. On the other hand, in the intestine and tail, where TH response genes are known to be up-regulated more dramatically by TH than in most other organs, we demonstrate that TH treatment induces gene activation and histone H4 acetylation. These data argue for a role of histone acetylation in transcriptional regulation by TRs during amphibian development in some tissues, whereas in others changes in histone acetylation levels may play no or only a minor role, supporting the existence of important alternative mechanisms in gene regulation by TR.

Acetylation↗

Steady-state levels of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The importance of control of the levels of histone acetylation for the control of gene expression in eukaryotic chromatin is being elucidated, and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven to be an important model system. The level of histone acetylation in yeast is the highest known. However, only acetylation of H4 has been quantified, and reports reveal loss of acetylation in histone preparations. A chaotropic guanidine-based method for histone isolation from intact wild-type cells or from a single-step nuclear preparation with butyrate preserves acetylation of all core histones. Histone H4 has an average of more than 2 acetylated lysines per molecule, distributed over 4 sites. Histones H2A, H3, and H2B have 0. 2, approximately 2, and >2 acetylated lysines per molecule, respectively, distributed across 2, 5, and 6 sites. Thus, yeast nucleosomes carry, on average, 13 acetylated lysines per octamer, i. e. just above the threshold of 10-12 deduced for transcriptionally activated chromatin of animals, plants, and algae. Following M(r) 100,000 ultrafiltration in 2.5% acetic acid, yeast histone H3 was purified to homogeneity by reversed-phase high pressure liquid chromatography. Other core histones were obtained at 80-95% purity.

Acetylation↗

Simple histone acetylation plays a complex role in the regulation of gene expression.

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin by histone proteins, which assemble the DNA into an organized, higher-order structure. The precise organization of chromatin is essential for faithful execution of DNA-mediated reactions such as transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair and DNA recombination. The organization of chromatin is considered to be regulated by a variety of post-translational modifications of histones, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and poly-ADP-ribosylation. The relationship between histone acetylation and gene expression was first observed in 1964. Since then, a great deal of evidence has accumulated showing that not only transcription but other DNA-mediated reactions also are regulated by histone acetylation. With regard to the putative mechanism(s) by which histone acetylation regulates the flow of genetic information, site-specific modification and recognition of acetylated histone/DNA complexes have been postulated. Elucidation of the downstream effects of histone modification, as well as the identification, isolation and characterization of the relevant factors involved, have aided in our understanding of the mechanisms of regulation of DNA activity by histones. Currently, state-of-the-art technologies that enable genome-wide analysis are allowing insight into a critical and interesting question in eukaryotic transcription: are the principles that govern transcription of individual gene loci applicable to the genome as a whole? Here, we review the recent progress on histone modifications, with an emphasis on the role of histone acetylation in gene expression.

Acetylation↗

Genome-wide analysis of the relationship between transcriptional regulation by Rpd3p and the histone H3 and H4 amino termini in budding yeast.

The histone amino termini have emerged as key targets for a variety of modifying enzymes that function as transcriptional coactivators and corepressors. However, an important question that has remained largely unexplored is the extent to which specific histone amino termini are required for the activating and repressive functions of these enzymes, Here we address this issue by focusing on the prototypical histone deacetylase, Rpd3p, in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that targeting Rpd3p to a reporter gene in this yeast can partially repress transcription when either the histone H3 or the histone H4 amino terminus is deleted, indicating that the "tails" are individually dispensable for repression by Rpd3p. In contrast, we find that the effect of rpd3 gene disruption on global gene expression is considerably reduced in either a histone H3Delta1-28 (H3 lacking the amino-terminal 28 amino acids) or a histone H4(K5,8,12,16Q) (H4 with lysine residues 5, 8, 12, and 16 changed to glutamine residues) background compared to the wild-type background, indicating a requirement for one or both of these histone tails in Rpd3p-mediated regulation for many genes. These results suggest that acetylation of either the H3 or the H4 amino terminus could suffice to allow the activation of such genes. We also examine the relationship between H3 tails and H4 tails in global gene expression and find substantial overlap among the gene sets regulated by these histone tails. We also show that the effects on genome-wide expression of deleting the H3 or H4 amino terminus are similar but not identical to the effects of mutating the lysine residues in these same regions. These results indicate that the gene regulatory potential of the H3 and H4 amino termini is substantially but not entirely contained in these modifiable lysine residues.

Acetylation↗

Cross-talking histones: implications for the regulation of gene expression and DNA repair.

The regulation of chromatin structure is essential to life. In eukaryotic organisms, several classes of protein exist that can modify chromatin structure either through ATP-dependent remodeling or through the post-translational modification of histone proteins. A vast array of processes ranging from transcriptional regulation to DNA repair rely on these histone-modifying enzymes. In the last few years, enzymes involved in the post-translational modification of histone proteins have become a topic of intense interest. Our work and the work of several other laboratories has focused largely on understanding the biological role of the yeast histone methyltransferase COMPASS (complex of proteins associated with Set1) and its human homologue the MLL complex. The Set1-containing complex COMPASS acts as the sole histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and this methyl mark is important for transcriptional regulation and silencing at the telomeres and rDNA loci. Another histone methyltransferase, Dot1, methylates lysine 79 of histone H3 and is also essential for proper silencing of genes near telomeres, the rDNA loci, and the mating type loci. Employing our global biochemical screen GPS (global proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae) we have been successful in identifying and characterizing several key downstream and upstream regulators of both COMPASS and Dot1 histone methyltransferase activity. This review details efforts made towards understanding the regulatory mechanisms and biological significance of COMPASS and Dot1p-mediated histone methylation.

DNA Repair↗

Inhibition of histone deacetylation enhances endotoxin-stimulated transcription but does not reverse endotoxin tolerance.

Covalent modification of histones and the subsequent remodeling of chromatin have emerged as important mechanisms in regulating gene expression. In particular, recent identification of the enzyme families responsible for the steady-state balance of histone acetylation has served to redefine our understanding of these modifications as fundamental biochemical processes regulating transcription. Current evidence suggests that histone acetylation correlates positively with gene activation, while histone deacetylation acts to repress transcription. In this study, we examined the role of histone modification in the inflammatory response to endotoxin. We focused on the endotoxin-stimulated expression of the interleukin-1beta promoter and tested the hypotheses that persistent histone deacetylation was responsible for the decreased expression of this promoter observed after prolonged exposure to endotoxin, a manifestation of a phenomenon known as endotoxin tolerance. We found that histone deacetylase inhibitors enhanced endotoxin-stimulated transcription; however, deacetylation inhibitors could neither block the development of tolerance nor restore endotoxin sensitivity in a tolerant cell. Deacetylase inhibitors could not restore LPS-mediated transcription in tolerant cells. These results show that histone acetylation/deacetylation regulates, at least in part, the endotoxin-induced expression of inflammatory genes and that repressed transcription observed in endotoxin tolerance is not caused by enhanced activity of histone deacetylases.

Blotting, Northern↗

The orphan nuclear receptor TR2 interacts directly with both class I and class II histone deacetylases.

A combination of in vivo and in vitro assays was employed to describe the ligand-independent interaction of the orphan nuclear receptor TR2 and histone deacetylase proteins. The repressive effect of TR2 on transcription of a luciferase reporter driven by a promoter containing a direct repeat-5 (DR5) derived from the human RARbeta gene was suppressed by the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Immunoprecipitation with FLAG-epitope (MDYKDDDDK)-tagged histone deacetylase proteins was used to demonstrate that TR2 and histone deacetylases 3 or 4 are present in the same immunoprecipitated complex. Deacetylase activity was demonstrated for these coimmunoprecipitates, further confirming the in vivo interaction of TR2 and histone deacetylases. Immunoprecipitation with anti-TR2 antibody was used to demonstrate interaction of TR2 with endogenously expressed histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in COS-1 cells. Dissection of TR2 domains showed that the DNA binding domain of the receptor was responsible for interaction with both histone deacetylases 3 and 4 in glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays, while the ligand binding domain did not interact. The pull-down data were confirmed with far Western blots that also showed a direct interaction between labeled histone deacetylase proteins and TR2. It is suggested that repression mediated by unliganded TR2 is mediated, in part, by a direct interaction of this receptor with histone deacetylase proteins.

Animals↗

Comprehensive mass spectrometry screening-derived atlas of HDAC inhibitors reveals histone-specific acetylation changes.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have emerged as valuable therapeutics for cancer and other diseases; however, their effects on histone post-translational modification remain poorly characterized. Here, we applied quantitative mass spectrometry and high-throughput sequencing to systematically profile site-specific changes in histone modifications in response to a panel of HDACis. This platform enabled mapping of histone modification changes across hundreds of sites, including low-abundance histone marks. Furthermore, an integrative analysis of chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data identified genome-wide binding sites for the low-abundance histone modification of H2A.Z acetylation in HeLa and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, highlighting the role of H2A.Z acetylation in regulating gene expression across diverse biological pathways, including specific genes involved in tumor suppressor pathways. Our findings provide a functional resource for identifying and quantifying histone modification changes and transcriptional regulation of histone H2A.Z acetylation following pharmacological perturbation.

Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors↗

The effect of oxidative stress on histone acetylation and IL-8 release.

Acetylation of histone residues regulates the expression of inflammatory genes and is controlled by the activities of histone acetyltransferases (HAT) and histone deacetylases (HDAC). Analysis of histone acetylation in human cells is limited by the large numbers needed to perform activity assays or Western blotting. We have used flow cytometry to investigate changes in HAT and HDAC activities at the single cell level and to investigate the effect of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) on histone H4 acetylation and cell-cycle progression. Using an anti-acetylated histone H4 antibody we show that H(2)O(2) induced a time-dependent increase in histone acetylation that was maintained for 12h. This was associated with increased IL-8 production. H(2)O(2) also affected cell-cycle progression. HAT activity was found to be highest in G2/M and equivalent in G0/G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. These data show that detection of acetylated histone residues at the single cell level using FACs may be a powerful new tool for the analysis of modulation of cell proliferation and gene transcription.

Acetylation↗

Histone methyltransferases in Aspergillus nidulans: evidence for a novel enzyme with a unique substrate specificity.

We have studied enzymes involved in histone arginine methylation in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Three distinct protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) could be identified, which all exhibit intrinsic histone methyltransferase activity when expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. Two of these proteins, termed RmtA (arginine methyltransferase A) and RmtC, reveal significant sequence homology to the well-characterized human proteins PRMT1 and PRMT5, respectively. Native as well as recombinant RmtA is specific for histone H4 with arginine 3 as the methylation site. Furthermore, methylation of histone H4 by recombinant RmtA affects the acetylation by p300/CBP, supporting an interrelation of histone methylation and acetylation in transcriptional regulation. The second methyltransferase, named RmtB, is only distantly related to human/rat PRMT3 and must be considered as a member of a separate group within the PRMT family. The 61 kDa protein, expressed as a GST fusion protein, exhibits a unique substrate specificity in catalyzing the methylation of histones H4, H3, and H2A. Unlike human PRMT3, the Aspergillus enzyme lacks a Zn-finger domain in the amino-terminal part indicating functional differences of RmtB. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis indicated that RmtB together with other fungal homologues is a member of a separate group within the PRMT proteins. The existence of in vivo arginine methylation on histones as demonstrated by site-specific antibodies and the high level and specificity of PRMTs for individual core histones in A. nidulans suggests an important role of these enzymes for chromatin modulating activities.

Acetylation↗

Proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation and histone modifications cooperatively associate with chromatin looping and transcriptional regulation.

BACKGROUND: Although liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) proteins are known to participate in genome organization and transcriptional regulation through the formation of biomolecular condensates, their functional interplay with other regulatory proteins and histone modifications in chromatin loop formation remains poorly characterized. By combining Hi-C chromatin interaction data with ChIP-seq profiles of 12, 27, and 24 LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively, we identified chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins and systematically analysed patterns of cooperative protein binding and histone modification enrichment within these loop-associated peaks. RESULTS: We identified 162, 313, and 431 chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively. These loops were relatively small in size and predominantly anchored at enhancer regions. Examination of cooperative binding of proteins within loop-associated peaks revealed that transcriptional repressor IKZF1, HDAC1, and SAP130 most frequently co-localized with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cells, respectively. Further analysis of histone modification enrichment patterns revealed that active histone modifications, such as H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac, co-localized at loop-associated peaks, with H3K4me1 exhibiting additional specific co-localization with these four histone modifications at enhancer-localized loop-associated peaks. Notably, bivalent chromatin domains where H3K27me3 co-localized with active histone modifications were identified at promoter-localized loop-associated peaks in HepG2 cells, and elevated H3K27me3 occupancy at these peaks was associated with transcriptional repression of target genes. Moreover, quantitative RNA-seq analysis revealed that the expression of target genes associated with enhancer-promoter loops was correlated with both the binding of LLPS proteins and the enrichment patterns of histone modifications within their ChIP-seq peaks at loop anchors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LLPS proteins may cooperate with transcriptional repressors to facilitate chromatin looping. Furthermore, local enrichment of histone modifications at loop-associated peaks provides additional regulatory control over chromatin architecture and gene transcription.

Humans↗

T cell autoimmunity to histones and nucleosomes is a latent property of the normal immune system.

OBJECTIVE: Investigators in this study undertook to determine whether in vitro antigen-responsive immune (polyomavirus T antigen [T-ag]- specific) and autoimmune (histone-specific) T cells from normal individuals share structural and genetic characteristics with those from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Histone-specific T cells were generated by stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with nucleosome-T-ag complexes and were subsequently maintained by pure histones. T-ag-specific T cell clones were initiated and maintained by T-ag. The frequencies of circulating histone- and T-ag-specific T cells were determined in healthy individuals and in SLE patients by limiting dilution of PBMCs. T cell receptor (TCR) gene usage and variable-region structures were determined by complementary DNA sequencing. These sequences were compared between T-ag- and histone-specific T cells and between normal individuals and SLE patients for each specificity. RESULTS: Individual in vitro-expanded histone- and T-ag-specific T cells from normal individuals displayed identical TCR V(alpha) and/or V(beta) chain third complementarity-determining region (CDR3) sequences, indicating that they were clonally expanded in vivo. The frequencies of in vitro antigen-responsive T-ag- or histone-specific T cells from normal individuals were similar to those from SLE patients. Although heterogeneous for variable-region structure and gene usage, histone-specific T cells from healthy individuals and SLE patients selected aspartic and/or glutamic acids at positions 99 and/or 100 of the V(beta) CDR3 sequence. CONCLUSION: Autoimmune T cells from healthy individuals can be activated by nucleosome- T-ag complexes and maintained by histones in vitro. Such T cells possessed TCR structures similar to those from SLE patients, demonstrating that T cell autoimmunity to nucleosomes may be a latent property of the normal immune system.

Adult↗

Do protein motifs read the histone code?

The existence of different patterns of chemical modifications (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and ADP-ribosylation) of the histone tails led, some years ago, to the histone code hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, these modifications would provide binding sites for proteins that can change the chromatin state to either active or repressed. Interestingly, some protein domains present in histone-modifying enzymes are known to interact with these covalent marks in the histone tails. This was first shown for the bromodomain, which was found to interact selectively with acetylated lysines at the histone tails. More recently, it has been described that the chromodomain can be targeted to methylation marks in histone N-terminal domains. Finally, the interaction between the SANT domain and histones is also well documented. Overall, experimental evidence suggests that these domains could be involved in the recruitment of histone-modifying enzymes to discrete chromosomal locations, and/or in the regulation their enzymatic activity. Within this context, we review the distribution of bromodomains, chromodomains and SANT domains among chromatin-modifying enzymes and discuss how they can contribute to the translation of the histone code.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Conservative segregation of maternally inherited CS histone variants in larval stages of sea urchin development.

Three sets of histone variants are coexisting in the embryo at larval stages of sea urchin's development: the maternally inherited cleavage stage variants (CS) expressed during the two initial cleavage divisions, the early histone variants, which are recruited into embryonic chromatin from middle cleavage stages until hatching and the late variants, that are fundamentally expressed from blastula stage onward. Since the expression of the CS histones is confined to the initial cleavage stages, these variants represent a very minor proportion of the histones present in the plutei larvae, whereas the late histone variants are predominant. To determine the position of these CS in the embryonic territories, we have immunolocalized the CS histone variants in plutei larvas harvested 72 h post-fertilization. In parallel, we have pulse labeled the DNA replicated during the initial cleavage cycle with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and its position was further determined in the plutei larvas by immunofluorescence. We have found that the CS histone variants were segregated to specific territories in the plutei. The position in which the CS histone variants were found to be segregated was consistent with the position in which the DNA molecules that were replicated during the initial cleavage divisions were localized. These results strongly suggest that a specification of embryonic nuclei occurs at the initial cleavage divisions which is determined by a chromatin organized by CS histone variants.

Animals↗

Extremely divergent histone H4 sequence from Trypanosoma cruzi: evolutionary implications.

Trypanosoma cruzi presents six histones electrophoretically resolved in three gel systems. Indirect evidence shows that one of these histones, named e, corresponds to H4 in other species. We present evidence that histone e is H4 by sequencing its amino terminal end. The amino terminal of T. cruzi histone H4, unlike that of other H4s examined thus far is not blocked. Moreover, this protein presents two variants. This partial amino acid sequence of T. cruzi histone H4 differs greatly from homologous sequences of human, yeast, or Tetrahymena. Since the conservatism of the core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) is clearly illustrated by comparative sequence analyses, the data shown here demonstrates that T. cruzi histone H4 is the most divergent reported. Quantitative analysis of the data suggests that the rate of substitutions in the histone H4 amino terminal sequence varies among different lineages. We postulate a slow-down in the evolutionary rate of histone H4 amino terminal domain in the metazoa branch related perhaps to the appearance of a novel function for this domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Differential regulation of H4 histone gene expression in 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes during arrest of proliferation following contact inhibition or differentiation and its modulation by TGF beta 1.

The aim of this study was to address whether there is a fundamental difference in regulation of histone gene expression in cells that have become quiescent but retain the ability to proliferate, compared with those cells that have differentiated. We compared multiple levels of regulation of histone gene expression during 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte differentiation. Confluent cells induced to differentiate by treatment with insulin, dexamethasone, and isobutylmethylxanthine initially exhibited an increased proliferative response compared with cells given serum alone. This initial differentiation response was associated with a twofold increase in both histone gene transcription and cellular histone mRNA levels, as well as with enhanced sequence-specific binding of nuclear factors to the proximal cell-cycle-regulatory element of the H4 histone promoter. Transforming growth factor beta 1, an inhibitor of 3T3-L1 differentiation, increased both the percentage of proliferating cells and the cellular levels of histone mRNA when given in addition to serum stimulation, but no enhancement of these parameters was observed upon addition of TGF beta 1 to the differentiation treatment. Interestingly, although TGF beta 1 enhanced binding of nuclear factors to the proximal cell cycle regulatory element of the histone promoter, these protein/DNA interactions were not associated with an increase in histone transcription. Our results are consistent with the down-regulation of histone gene expression at confluency being controlled primarily at the post-transcriptional level, in contrast to an increased involvement of transcriptional down-regulation at the onset of differentiation.

3T3 Cells↗