Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Spa therapy and balneotherapy for treating low back pain: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a major public health concern and complementary treatments are frequently used for this condition. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of spa therapy and balneotherapy for treating low back pain. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Amed Cochrane Central, the UK National Research Register and ClincalTrials.gov (all until July 2005). Hand searches were performed and experts contacted. Methodological quality was assessed using a standard scale. RESULTS: Five randomized clinical trials met all inclusion criteria. Quantitative data synthesis was performed. The data for spa therapy, assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), suggest significant beneficial effects compared with waiting list control groups (weighted mean difference 26.6 mm, 95% confidence interval 20.4-32.8, n=442) for patients with chronic low back pain. For balneotherapy the data, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, also suggest beneficial effects compared with control groups (weighted mean difference 18.8 mm, 95% confidence interval 10.3-27.3, n=138). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the data are scarce, there is encouraging evidence suggesting that spa therapy and balneotherapy may be effective for treating patients with low back pain. These data are not compelling but warrant rigorous large-scale trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Bed rest or normal activity for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The management of common low back pain has two principal objectives: to relieve acute pain and to attempt prevention of transition to chronicity. Several studies have shown the ineffectiveness of prolonged periods of bed rest. OBJECTIVE: To compare 4 days of bed rest with continued normal daily activity in acute low back pain, taking into account the type of work (physical or sedentary labor). METHODS: This open, comparative multicenter study enrolled 281 ambulatory patients, ages 18 to 65 years, with low back pain (onset < 72 hours). The subjects did not have pain radiating below the buttocks and did not have work-related injuries. They were randomized into two treatment groups: one instructed to continue normal activity (insofar as the pain allowed), and the other prescribed 4 days of bed rest. After inclusion, patients were seen at three visits: on day 6 or 7, after 1 month, and after 3 months. RESULTS: On day 6 or 7, pain intensity was similar for both groups, as was the overall judgment of the treatment by patients and physicians. At 1 and 3 months, the groups again had equivalent intensity of back pain, functional disability, and vertebral stiffness. A higher proportion of patients in the bed rest group than in the normal activity group had an initial sick leave (86% vs 52%; P < 0.0001). This difference was greater for the patients whose work was sedentary. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with acute low back pain, normal activity is at least equivalent to bed rest. The findings of this study indicate that prescriptions for bed rest, and thus for sick leaves, should be limited when the physical demands of the job are similar to those for daily life activities.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

EMG activity of trunk muscles and torque output during isometric axial rotation exertion: a comparison between back pain patients and matched controls.

Abnormal patterns of trunk muscle activity could affect the biomechanics of spinal movements and result in back pain. The present study aimed to examine electromyographic (EMG) activity of abdominal and back muscles as well as triaxial torque output during isometric axial rotation at different exertion levels in back pain patients and matched controls. Twelve back pain patients and 12 matched controls performed isometric right and left axial rotation at 100%, 70%, 50% and 30% maximum voluntary contractions in a standing position. Surface EMG activity of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, iliocostalis lumborum and multifidus were recorded bilaterally. The primary torque in the transverse plane and the coupling torques in sagittal and coronal planes were measured. Results showed that there was a trend (P = 0.08) of higher flexion coupling torque during left axial rotation exertion in back pain patients. Higher activity for external oblique and lower activity for multifidus was shown during left axial rotation exertion in back pain group when compared to the control group. In right axial rotation, back pain patients exhibited lesser activity of rectus abdominis at higher levels of exertion when compared with matched controls. These findings demonstrated that decreased activation of one muscle may be compensated by overactivity in other muscles. The reduced levels of activity of the multifidus muscle during axial rotation exertion in back pain patients may indicate that spinal stability could be compromised. Future studies should consider these alternations in recruitment patterns in terms of spinal stability and internal loading. The findings also indicate the importance of training for coordination besides the strengthening of trunk muscles during rehabilitation process.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed1995

Are radiologic changes in the thoracic and lumbar spine of adolescents risk factors for low back pain in adults? A 25-year prospective cohort study of 640 school children.

STUDY DESIGN: This report was based on a 25-year prospective cohort study and designed as a self-administered questionnaire with low back pain as the main topic. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether radiologic changes in the thoracic and lumbar spine and a history of low back pain in the adolescent period represent risk factors for low back pain in adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Six-hundred-forty 14-year-old school children were examined with x-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine and registered by the school doctor regarding a history of low back pain. METHODS: All of the x-rays and the short journals from the school doctor's registration were reviewed. This primary information was the basis of the investigation 25 years later. RESULTS: Eleven percent of the cohort had a history of low back pain in adolescence, and the results showed an 84% lifetime prevalence of low back pain in these subjects as adults and an increased frequency of low back pain the last month and week before they answered the questionnaire, compared with the rest of the cohort. These problems were associated with increased morbidity and decreased working capacity. Thirteen percent had radiologic abnormalities, mainly Scheuermann changes, in the thoracic and lumbar spine as adolescents, with no positive correlation to low back pain in this period. Unlike other reports, our results did not confirm a positive correlation between x-ray changes in the lower spine in adolescents and a higher prevalence of low back pain in adults. Stepwise logistic regression analyses showed that low back pain in the growth period and familial occurrence of back disease are important risk factors for low back pain later in life, with an observed probability of 88% if both factors are present. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that low back pain in the growth period is "a real problem," with a trend toward aggravation as time passes. Thus, implementing preventive measures in schools may be very important.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a population based, state-wide public health intervention designed to alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and costs of compensation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, non-randomised, non-equivalent, before and after telephone surveys of the general population and postal surveys of general practitioners with an adjacent state as control group and descriptive analysis of claims database. SETTING: Two states in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 4730 members of general population before and two and two and a half years after campaign started, in a ratio of 2:1:1; 2556 general practitioners before and two years after campaign onset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Back beliefs questionnaire, knowledge and attitude statements about back pain, incidence of workers' financial compensation claims for back problems, rate of days compensated, and medical payments for claims related to back pain and other claims. RESULTS: In the intervention state beliefs about back pain became more positive between successive surveys (mean improvement in questionnaire score 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5), P<0.001 and 3.2 (2.6 to 3.9), P<0.001, between baseline and the second and third survey, respectively). Beliefs about back pain also improved among doctors. There was a clear decline in number of claims for back pain, rates of days compensated, and medical payments for claims for back pain over the duration of the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: A population based strategy of provision of positive messages about back pain improves population and general practitioner beliefs about back pain and seems to influence medical management and reduce disability and workers' compensation costs related to back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prognosis for people with back pain under a No-fault 24-hour-cover compensation scheme.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive casenote review of consecutive back pain claimants assessing claim outcome at 12 months from onset. OBJECTIVE: To assess prognosis for back pain claimants in a no-fault 24-hour-cover accident compensation system. BACKGROUND: New Zealand has a unique accident compensation system that may provide incentives for health professionals to classify people with backache as having a back injury and incentives for back pain claimants to continue claims longer than would be the case in other compensation systems. METHODS: One hundred consecutive back pain claimants were identified from a single office of New Zealand's sole accident compensation insurer (Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation; ACC), who were still receiving compensation payments 4 weeks after the initial date of the claim. The study end point was case closure in the subsequent 12 months. Case closure rate was analyzed in relation to several potential prognostic variables. RESULTS: Of the 100 cases identified in which the claimant was receiving compensation 4 weeks from the initial date of the claim, 43 cases were not closed by 6 months, and 30 cases were not closed at 12 months. The variable most strongly associated with case nonclosure was whether the claimant was receiving earnings-related compensation (equal to 80% of previous income), with 41% of this group still receiving compensation at 12 months versus 16% of the group not receiving earnings-related compensation (chi2 = 8.55, P = 0.003). These results compare unfavorably with those from previous published studies from The Netherlands and Jersey in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: New Zealand's unique accident compensation environment may discourage return to work for people with back pain. New Zealand legislators should assess the impact of the ACC scheme on people with back pain, particularly in light of the recent recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Pain Task Force on Back Pain in the Workplace, that compensation cover for workers with back pain be limited to 6 weeks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Effective treatment of low back pain in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible cause of low back pain in pregnancy and develop a management program. METHOD: All women attending a rural general practice for antenatal care were asked about back pain. They were tested for pain of lumbar and sacroiliac origin and if positive were treated with mobilising technique and home exercise. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients identified as having low back pain, the iliolumbar ligament was identified in three while the sacroiliac joint was suggestive in the remainder. After three visits 15 had no pain and the rest had more than a 50% improvement in their pain. CONCLUSION: Low back pain in pregnancy is likely to be due to sacroiliac dysfunction which can be significantly improved with mobilisation.

Female↗
PubMed1985

A controlled evaluation of paraspinal EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Sixty-six chronic low back pain sufferers were randomly divided into three groups. Following individual assessments consisting of psychological questionnaires, pain monitoring, and measurement of paraspinal electromyogram (EMG), one group received paraspinal EMG biofeedback and another a placebo treatment. The third group received no intervention. Two further assessments were carried out on all groups immediately after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up. All groups showed significant reduction in pain, anxiety, depression, and paraspinal EMG following treatment and at follow-up, but there were no differences between groups. A regression analysis failed to identify subjects' characteristics that predicted positive outcome in the biofeedback group. However, high scores on the Evaluative scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and high hypnotizability were significant predictors of positive outcome for the placebo group. It is concluded that paraspinal EMG biofeedback is not a specific treatment for chronic low back pain in a nonhospitalized population.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Optoelectronic movement analysis to measure motor performance in patients with chronic low back pain: test of reliability.

OBJECTIVE: To assess test-retest reliability of the Posturo-Locomotion-Manual(PLM) test in patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: A controlled study in which the PLM test was used repeatedly on patients with chronic low back pain and persons without back pain. SUBJECTS: Twelve patients with treatment-resistant chronic low back pain, selected by 2 orthopaedic spine surgeons and 12 age- and sex-matched individuals with no back pain history. METHODS: An optoelectronic camera and a computer were used to quantify the performance during a simple test in which subjects picked up an object from the floor and transported it up to a shelf, thereby forcing the body through postural, locomotor and manual movements. The outcome measures were: movement time, simultaneity index and phase times for postural, locomotion and arm movement phases. Statistical analyses regarding intra-individual agreement between the measurements (reliability analysis) and changes over time were carried out. RESULTS: The effect of test movement habituation was minimized when the lowest mean value of any of 3 consecutive measures (tri-average) was used. In the control group, variation between test occasions was small. In the group of patients with chronic low back pain there was a random measurement error before intervention (sensory motor learning). After intervention the PLM test had the same precision in both groups. CONCLUSION: When the tri-average measure is used, the influence of test movement habituation is minimized and the optoelectronic PLM test is found to be reliable and responsive. It proved to be a useful tool to quantify dynamic performance in freely moving patients with chronic low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Methods of stimulating acupuncture points for treatment of chronic back pain in horses.

Horses with chronic back pain of 2 to 108 months' duration were treated using acupuncture (n = 15), laser acupuncture (n = 15), or injection acupuncture (n = 15). Horses were treated once a week for 8 treatments (mean) with needle acupuncture, 11 treatments with laser acupuncture, or 9 treatments with injection acupuncture. After treatment, 37 horses had alleviation of clinical signs of pain and could train and compete: 13 horses treated with needle acupuncture; 11 horses treated with laser acupuncture; and 13 horses treated with injection acupuncture. Seemingly, the 3 types of acupuncture were equally useful for treating horses with chronic back pain.

Acupuncture Therapy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The segmental dorsal ramus neuropathy as a common cause of chronic and recurrent low back pain.

The causes of recurrent and chronic low back pain usually remain unknown. The dorsal ramus lesion was found in 57 of 200 low back pain patients in this study in L5 or L4 segment without any neurophysiologic or neuroradiologic evidence of proximal ventral root compression. The neuropathy of dorsal rami, especially in their medial branches seems to be surprisingly common finding associated with low back pain and referred symptoms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Epidemiology of low back pain in the elderly: correlation with lumbar lordosis.

We carried out an epidemiologic study to determine the prevalence of low back pain in elderly Japanese and to examine the correlation with lumbar lordosis in sagittal plane radiographs. Low back pain is an enormous clinical and public health problem. With the increasing use of spinal instrumentation, the measurement of lumbar lordosis is thought to be important. However, in elderly Japanese, the prevalence of low back pain and its correlation with lumbar lordosis is not clear. Five hundred and nine people, aged 50-85 years, were examined, and 489 subjects met our criteria. Clinical findings, physical status, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain were examined in these subjects. Measurements and determination of total lordosis from L1-S1 were made from standing radiographs. Forty-eight percent of the subjects had experienced low back pain within the previous 3 months. Women had low back pain more frequently (P = 0.006). There was a significant difference in lumbar lordosis between the groups with and without low back pain (P = 0.0006). Lumbar lordosis was approximately 4 degrees less in the low back pain group and there was no relationship to age or sex in either group. VAS was significantly inversely correlated with lumbar lordosis (P = 0.025, at rest). The body mass index (BMI) of the low back pain group was higher in women, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.06). In conclusion, lumbar lordosis was defined and its prevalence in elderly Japanese was reported together with VAS and physical data used to compare the two groups.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Classics from the spine literature revisited: a randomized trial of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of a trial of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity and results of the study, and their applicability to and influence on current clinical practice and recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although bed rest has been a cornerstone of treatment for acute low back pain, historically this recommendation was largely based on "expert opinion." In 1986, Deyo et al. published a randomized study of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain. Despite results from this and other studies, current clinical practice and treatment recommendations continue to overemphasize bed rest. METHODS: The study was reviewed using structured criteria adopted from the medical literature that focus on the validity of the study design, the results of the treatment, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were randomized to 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest. Groups were similar at baseline evaluation. Outcomes assessed at 3 and 12 weeks were similar between groups, except that patients receiving a recommendation for 2 days of bed rest had significantly fewer days of work absence than those recommended 7 days. Limitations of the study included poor compliance with recommended bed rest, especially in the 7-day group, a marginal sample size without information on relevant confidence intervals, and patient characteristics that may have affected the generalizability of these findings to others with acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, this study provided strong evidence that less bed rest was associated with similar outcomes for acute low back pain along with quicker return to work. Results from this and other studies support a shift away from bed rest as a primary recommendation in the initial management of low back pain. In spite of this, bed rest recommendations for episodes of low back pain remain common. Additional efforts are needed to change clinical practice.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2004

[Chronic lower back pain: a new therapeutic approach].

Lower back pain is a common complaint of patients seen in our consultations. Despite progress, surgical procedures are still often unsuccessful in relieving pain. Blocks performed in the epidural spaces or more often in the articular facets have provided poor relief of chronic lower back pain. The pain has vegetative components. Considering anatomic findings, we describe the innervation of the peridiscal tIssues which suffer during degenarative conditions. We analyze the course of the autogenic nerves mediating lumbar pain, and select the site of the blocks necessary to obtain optimal selective pain relief. A well-defined block at the level of the communicating rami is described.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2001

Exercises and education as secondary prevention for recurrent low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Exercise and education is a common physiotherapy approach in the prevention of low back pain. A Mensendieck exercise programme consisting of exercises and ergonomical education has, in a previous study, been shown to be effective in preventing recurrent low back pain during one-year follow-up. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effect of the Mensendieck exercise programme on people with recurrent episodes of low back pain who, when entering the study, had finished treatment for their last episode of low back pain. METHOD: A randomized controlled clinical trial in which 41 women and 36 men were allocated to either a Mensendieck or control group. The Mensendieck subjects received 20 group sessions of exercises and ergonomical education over 13 weeks. The control subjects were not offered any prophylactic therapy, but were free to receive treatment or exercises. Outcome measures were the number of recurrences of low back pain, sick leave, low back function and general functional status. RESULTS: At three-year follow-up, 11 subjects had been lost to the study. Survival analysis showed a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in subjects experiencing recurrent low back pain in the Mensendieck group compared to the control group. Significant improvements in pain and function scores were reported in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in pain, function or sick leave. CONCLUSION: A Mensendieck exercise programme seems efficient in reducing recurrent episodes of low back pain at three-year follow-up, but it did not influence sick leave, pain or function scores.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Disability, pain, psychological factors and physical performance in healthy controls, patients with sub-acute and chronic low back pain: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare measures of disability, psychological factors, pain and physical performance in healthy controls, and patients with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. To evaluate the concept of the deconditioning syndrome and to explore factors that may contribute to chronicity. DESIGN: Case-control study. SUBJECTS: Three age- and gender-matched groups were included in the study; healthy controls (n = 45), patients sick-listed 8-12 weeks (n = 46) and patients with chronic low back pain on a waiting list for lumbar instrumented fusion (n = 45). METHODS: Measures of disability, pain, psychological factors, and physical performance were obtained from the 3 groups using validated measures. RESULTS: Gender, age, body weight and height were not significantly different between the groups. Comparable scores were found for self-rated working ability, fear-avoidance beliefs for physical activity and aerobic capacity in the 2 patient groups. Oswestry Disability Index, pain, emotional distress, abdominal and back muscle endurance were significantly different between the 3 groups. Self-efficacy for pain and fear-avoidance beliefs for work was significantly different between the 2 patient groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a stepwise deterioration of impairment and disability from healthy controls to patients with chronic low back pain. Most variables distinguished between healthy controls and patients with sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Deconditioning was more related to psychophysical measures of abdominal and back muscle endurance than to cardiovascular fitness. Comparable scores for fear-avoidance and working ability in the 2 patient categories suggest that these factors appear at an early stage and contribute to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), originally based on the gate-control theory of pain, is widely used for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Despite its wide use and theoretical rationale, there appears at first glance little scientific evidence to support its use. This Cochrane review examines the available evidence on TENS for the treatment of chronic back pain through an exhaustive search of the literature. OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) for chronic low back pain management have experienced a tremendous growth over the past 25 years. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of TENS and ALTENS for reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic back pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE up to November 1997, EMBASE from 1985 to September 1995, Amed and Ciscom to January 1995, reference lists of the retrieved articles, proceedings of conferences and contacted investigators in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing TENS or ALTENS therapy to placebo in patients with chronic low back pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data on pain reduction, range of movement, functional and work status. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials were included. The trials included 288 participants with an average age range of 45 to 50 years and approximately equal numbers of women and men. The overall odds ratio for improvement in pain for each comparison was: TENS/ALTENS versus placebo 2.11 (95% confidence interval 1.32 to 3. 38), ALTENS versus placebo 7.22 (95% confidence interval 2.60 to 20.01) and TENS versus placebo 1.52 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 2.58). The odds ration for improvement in range of motion on ALTENS versus placebo was 6.61 (95% confidence interval 2.36 to 18.55). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from the limited data available that TENS/ALTENS reduces pain and improves range of motion in chronic back pain patients, at least in the short term. A large trial of ALTENS and TENS is needed to confirm these findings.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2006

The effect of lifting and lowering an external load on repositioning error of trunk flexion-extension in subjects with and without low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the repositioning error of trunk flexion-extension in individuals with low back pain is different from that in those not experiencing low back pain when lifting and lowering external loads. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: Physical therapy department of a medical centre. SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects with subacute low back pain and 20 control subjects without low back pain. INTERVENTIONS: Tasks with and without lifting and lowering an external load. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The trunk repositioning errors were measured with Measurand Shape Tape. RESULTS: In subjects with low back pain, trunk repositioning errors were significantly reduced when lifting and lowering an external load in the direction of flexion (3.77 +/- 1.26 degrees in a loaded condition versus 4.82 +/- 2.97 degrees in an unloaded condition; P < 0.05) and extension (3.17 +/- 2.15 degrees in a loaded condition versus 5.03 +/- 3.74 degrees in an unloaded condition; P < 0.05). In control subjects, trunk repositioning errors were not significantly changed when lifting and lowering an external load in the direction of flexion (2.80 +/- 1.39 degrees in a loaded condition versus 2.63 +/- 1.24 degrees in an unloaded condition; P > 0.05) and extension (2.87 +/- 11.40 degrees in a loaded condition versus 3.15 +/- 11.50 degrees in an unloaded condition; P > 0.05). The direction of motion (trunk flexion or extension) was not shown to be significant in this study. CONCLUSION: Performing the task whilst lifting or lowering a submaximal load showed a reduced trunk repositioning error in subjects with subacute low back pain. Lifting and lowering a submaximal load might be considered as one of the rehabilitative strategies to hasten a return to work.

Adult↗