Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vomiting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Boerhaave's syndrome after postoperative vomiting.

UNLABELLED: Postoperative nausea and vomiting are common after general anesthesia but rarely produce life-threatening conditions. We report a case of postoperative vomiting complicated by esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome). As this complication is quite rare and can have varied and atypical presentations, anesthesiologists may fail to consider this diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS: We report a case of postoperative vomiting complicated by esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome). As this complication is quite rare, anesthesiologists may fail to consider this diagnosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Single-dose haloperidol for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine.

UNLABELLED: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurs frequently with the use of intrathecal morphine. We studied the ability of a single, small dose of the inexpensive, long-acting, dopamine receptor-blocking drug, haloperidol, to prevent PONV after spinal anesthesia using local anesthetic with morphine 0.3 mg. One-hundred-eight adult patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic or endoscopic urologic procedures under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive IM haloperidol 1 mg (H1), haloperidol 2 mg (H2), or placebo (P) after an intrathecal injection. Patients were assessed for 24 h after surgery, with treatment failure being defined as nausea >1 on a 10-cm visual analog scale or any vomiting or request for rescue antiemetic. Most treatment failures occurred during the first 12 h (60% overall), and haloperidol led to a dose-dependent decrease in PONV (first 12 h: 76% P, 56% H1, and 50% H2; P = 0.012). A history of PONV was strongly associated with PONV in the current study, regardless of treatment group. There were no dystonic reactions noted to either dose of haloperidol. We conclude that haloperidol reduces the incidence of PONV after intrathecal morphine, although this incidence remains a significant problem even with treatment. IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, a single, small IM dose of haloperidol 1 mg or 2 mg reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal anesthesia with local anesthetic and intrathecal morphine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A randomized controlled comparison of electro-acupoint stimulation or ondansetron versus placebo for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

In this study we evaluated the efficacy of electro-acupoint stimulation, ondansetron versus placebo for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Patients undergoing major breast surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into active electro-acupoint stimulation (A), ondansetron 4 mg IV (O), or sham control (placement of electrodes without electro-acupoint stimulation; placebo [P]). The anesthetic regimen was standardized. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, rescue antiemetic use, pain, and patient satisfaction with management of PONV were assessed at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min, and at 24 h. The complete response (no nausea, vomiting, or use of rescue antiemetic) was significantly more frequent in the active treatment groups compared with placebo both at 2 h (A/O/P = 77%/64%/42%, respectively; P = 0.01) and 24 h postoperatively (A/O/P = 73%/52%/38%, respectively; P = 0.006). The need for rescue antiemetic was less in the treatment groups (A/O/P = 19%/28%/54%; P = 0.04). Specifically, the incidence and severity of nausea were significantly less in the A group compared with the other groups, and in the O group compared with the P group (A/O/P = 19%/40%/79%, respectively). The A group experienced less pain in the postanesthesia care unit, compared with the O and P groups. Patients in the treatment groups were more satisfied with their management of PONV compared with placebo. When used for the prevention of PONV, electro-acupoint stimulation or ondansetron was more effective than placebo with greater degree of patient satisfaction, but electro-acupoint stimulation seems to be more effective in controlling nausea, compared with ondansetron. Stimulation at P6 also has analgesic effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients.

Risk scores to predict the occurrence of postoperative vomiting (PV) or nausea and vomiting that were developed for adult patients do not fit for children, because several risk factors are difficult to assess or are usually not applicable in pediatric patients (e.g., smoking status). Thus, in the present study, we sought to develop and to validate a simple score to predict PV in children (POVOC-score). Development and validation of the new score was based on data from 4 independent institutions of 1257 children (aged 0-14 yr) undergoing various types of surgery under general anesthesia without antiemetic prophylaxis. Preoperatively, several potential risk factors were recorded. Postoperatively, the occurrence of PV was observed for up to 24 h. The dataset was randomly split into an evaluation set (n = 657) that was analyzed using a forward logistic regression technique and a validation set (n = 600) that was used to confirm the accuracy of prediction by means of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Four independent risk factors for PV were identified in the final analysis: duration of surgery >/=30 min, age >/=3 yr, strabismus surgery, and a positive history of PV in the children or PV/postoperative nausea and vomiting in relatives (mother, father, or siblings). The incidence of PV was 9%, 10%, 30%, 55%, and 70% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors observed. Using these incidences as cut-off values in the validation dataset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.77). Our data suggest that PV can be predicted with an acceptable accuracy using a four-item simplified risk score.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Prophylactic dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric strabismus surgery: a dose ranging and safety evaluation study.

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of different doses of prophylactic IV dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 168 children (aged 2-15 yr) scheduled for strabismus surgery. Patients received IV dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg (D 0.25), 0.5 mg/kg (D 0.5), 1.0 mg/kg (D 1), or saline (S) immediately after induction of general anesthesia. Patients were discharged 24 h after surgery. Nausea and vomiting were assessed at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h after surgery. Blood glucose was measured preoperatively and at 4 h after study drug administration. Wound healing and infection were assessed after 1 wk. More patients in group S had vomiting at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.04, respectively) and required larger doses of rescue antiemetics compared with the dexamethasone groups. Fewer patients in the dexamethasone groups (6, 3, and 6 in D 0.25, D 0.5, and D 1, respectively) had severe PONV compared with group S (P = 0.001). No significant increase in postoperative blood glucose levels was observed and wound healing was satisfactory in all four groups. The results suggest that dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg is more effective than saline and equally effective compared with larger doses for preventing PONV for pediatric strabismus surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation with the ReliefBand for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

We randomized 94 patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia to receive transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation using the ReliefBand at the P6 point (active group) or an active ReliefBand applied to the dorsum of the wrist (sham control group). The ReliefBand was applied 30-60 min preoperatively and left in place for 24 h. There was no statistically significant difference between the active and sham control groups in the incidence of intraoperative/postoperative nausea (30% versus 43%/23% versus 41%), vomiting (13% versus 9%/26 versus 37%), need for rescue antiemetics (23% versus 18%/34% versus 39%), or complete response (55% versus 57%/51% versus 34%). There was also no difference between the two groups in nausea scores, number of vomiting episodes, or patient satisfaction with postoperative nausea and vomiting management.

Acupuncture Points↗
PubMed2006

Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain after transsphenoidal surgery: a review of 877 patients.

Although postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain after supra- and infratentorial craniotomy have been evaluated in multiple studies, there are few data regarding pain or postoperative nausea and vomiting after transsphenoidal procedures. Therefore, we reviewed the perioperative records of 877 patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery by the same surgeon. The overall incidence of postoperative emesis was 7.5%, significantly less than most studies of neurosurgical patients. An intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and subsequent fat grafting, the use of lumbar intrathecal catheter, and patients presenting for the resection of a craniopharyngiomas all had a significantly increased incidence of postoperative emesis (11.4%, 17.1%, and 18%, respectively). Interestingly, antiemetic prophylaxis did not decrease the risk of vomiting overall or in any cohort of patients; however, both droperidol and ondansetron decreased the incidence of nausea in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Regarding pain and morphine consumption, patients who later developed diabetes insipidus had a significant increase in morphine requirements in the PACU. No other disease state was associated with increased pain or morphine consumption in the PACU.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2004

Brugada syndrome-like ST-segment elevation increase exacerbated by vomiting.

The patient was a 53 year-old male who had 3 syncopal episodes over a 6-month period. In the electrophysiological study, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was repeatedly induced by the ventricular extrastimulus method. Intravenous pilsicainide was administered, and the J-point and ST-segment in the right precordial leads became slightly elevated just following drug administration. Five min later, the patient experienced severe nausea and then vomited twice, at which point the electrocardiogram (ECG) showed increased elevation of the J-point and ST-segment. These ECG changes recovered to normal 30 min later. The cause of his syncope was strongly suspected to be related to the VF associated with Brugada syndrome. An interesting aspect of this case was the particular type of J-point and ST-segment elevation that was induced when the patient experienced nausea and vomiting. It is proposed that this phenomenon originated from the vagal stimulation associated with the nausea and vomiting.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2004

Low-dose granisetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of low-dose granisetron in postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. DATA SOURCES: Clinical trials available through PubMed and OVID (1966-July 2003), as well as information supplied by the drug manufacturer, were accessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Safety concerns associated with droperidol and limited availability of other agents have created a need to restructure prophylaxis guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting. It has recently been proposed that granisetron may be effective at a dose that is one-tenth of the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose. Conflicting evidence for this regimen is evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the scarcity of supporting data, this regimen is not recommended for prophylaxis in patients at risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2002

Ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for the control of nausea and vomiting.

Ramosetron is a selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with an affinity higher than that of the previously available drugs ondansetron, granisetron and tropisetron. Ramosetron was shown in pharmacological assays to inhibit activities mediated by 5-HT3 receptors, such as emesis caused by cisplatin. In clinical trials, ramostreon was at least as effective as the reference "setrons" against nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy or surgical interventions, but the efficacy was well maintained during a 48-h period, so that efficacy was significantly higher with ramosetron in terms of nausea and vomiting 6-48 h after treatment. Hence, ramosetron represents a good alternative over previously available drugs for the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Data in children also support the efficacy of ramosetron, which is well tolerated by both child and adult patients.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Recurrent paroxysmal complete heart block induced by vomiting.

A woman had a 40-year history of vomiting associated with syncope. Spontaneous and induced vomiting was predictably associated with sinus bradycardia, paroxysmal atrioventricular block, and ventricular asystole. The clinical and laboratory studies carried out to illustrate the mechanism of this unusual complication of vomiting demonstrated it to be due to a vagovagal reflex initiated by distension of upper esophagus.

Bradycardia↗
PubMed1997

The influence of a new timing strategy of band adjustment on the vomiting frequency and the food consumption of obese women operated with laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LAP-BAND).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a new timing strategy of band adjustment on the short-term outcome of obese women operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding. SUBJECTS: The outcome of 30 women without binge-eating disorder operated with laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding with a wider intraoperatory band calibration (LAP-BAND) was compared to that of 30 body mass index-matched women without binge-eating disorder previously operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) applied by laparotomy with the usual intraoperatory band calibration. The patients were evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. MEASUREMENTS: (1) weight loss; (2) total daily energy intake; (3) percent as liquid, soft or solid food; (4) vomiting frequency; (5) rate of postoperative percutaneous band adjustments; (6) rate of band-related complications. RESULTS: Both the weight loss and the daily energy intake did not differ between patients with LAP-BAND and patients with ASGB. After surgery, the patients with LAP-BAND ate more solid food and less liquid food than the patients with ASGB. Vomiting frequency was higher in patients with ASGB than in patients with LAP-BAND. The total number of percutaneous band adjustments was higher in women with LAP-BAND than in women with ASGB. Band inflation because of weight stabilization was performed in six (20.0%) women with ASGB and in 19 (63.3%) women with LAP-BAND. Neostoma stenosis occurred in one woman with ASGB, but in none of the women with LAP-BAND. One patient with LAP-BAND presented band slippage. CONCLUSIONS: The wider intraoperatory band calibration performed in patients with LAP-BAND did not reduce the short-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding. This new timing strategy of band adjustment required more postoperative percutaneous band inflations, but it improved the eating pattern of the patients (low vomiting frequency and high intake of solid food).

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Granisetron: new insights into its use for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Granisetron (Kytril, Roche) is a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist indicated for the prevention of nausea and/or vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of emetogenic chemotherapy, including high-dose cisplatin. Its indication expanded in August 2002, with approval from the FDA for the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Granisetron strongly and selectively binds to the 5-HT(3) receptor with a binding constant of 0.26 nM and exhibits a 4000 - 40,000 times greater binding affinity for the 5-HT(3) receptor than other binding sites, including other 5HT subtypes and adrenergic, histaminergic and opioid receptors. Its selectivity to the 5-HT(3) receptor over other receptor types is > 1000:1. Granisetron noncompetitively binds to the 5-HT(3) receptor and is associated with a long duration of action as shown by the inhibition of a 5-HT axonal response flare for up to 24 h. Granisetron is unique among the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists because it is not metabolised via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 pathway and is, therefore, less susceptible to variation in patient response because of factors such as pharmacogenomic differences. Granisetron and other 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists are first-line agents for acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), whereas combination therapy with 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, dexamethasone and neurokinin (NK)-1 receptor antagonism (i.e., with the recently approved aprepitant) is an effective approach to prevent delayed CINV. Granisetron has been shown to be an effective within-class rescue antiemetic for prophylactic failures, which may be linked to its pharmacological properties including non-competitive, insurmountable binding to the 5-HT(3) receptor. As with other 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, granisetron is well-tolerated with adverse events of mild severity including headache, asthenia and constipation. Overall, data demonstrate that granisetron is an efficacious, safe and cost-effective member of the 5HT(3)-receptor antagonist class for the prevention of CINV.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2004

Aprepitant: a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life, and although the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, delayed nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem. Aprepitant (Emend), Merck) is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. When added to a standard regimen of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, it improves the complete response rate of acute CINV. Aprepitant also improves the complete response of delayed CINV when used in combination with dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone. Based on these studies, new guidelines for the prevention of CINV have been developed for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The use of aprepitant in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy will await the review and analysis of recently completed Phase III trials. Aprepitant is a substrate, a moderate inhibitor and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C9. Drug interactions should be monitored when aprepitant is coadministered with agents affected by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 isoenzymes. The safety and efficacy of aprepitant has not been established in pediatric or adolescent patients, and aprepitant has not been evaluated in the treatment of patients with established nausea and vomiting. Future studies may consider the use of aprepitant with current and other new agents in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Pharmaceutical care of postoperative nausea and vomiting: balanced scorecard for outcomes.

Using the balanced scorecard to measure outcomes, a multidisciplinary team worked to improve antiemetic therapy and decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction measures were nausea and pain scales (10 cm, nonnumbered, visual analog). The quality measure was number of vomiting episodes. Cost measures were length of postoperative stay and antiemetic requirement. Institutional learning was assessed by spread of prescribing changes beyond the first cohort of patients. Intervention subjects were providers of general anesthesia in two cohorts of patients (60 and 346) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Outcome assessment revealed low nausea and vomiting scores throughout the study, and antiemetic use decreased 50%. There were no deteriorations in pain scores or length of stay. Balanced scorecard measurements suggest no adverse unintended outcomes consequent to changes in prescribing behavior. Balanced scorecard processes assisted consensus among pharmacists, nurses, and physicians that may have accelerated behavioral changes.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Vomiting induction by ipecac syrup in dogs and ferrets.

The dog has been used as an experimental animal in emesis research. In this study, we analyzed the emetic effects of ipecac syrup using a smaller animal, the ferret, and compared its response to that of the dog. Dogs and ferrets were divided into 4 groups (n = 4, each). Each group was given either 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 ml/kg of ipecac syrup, and the latency and numbers of retching and vomiting were recorded. Animals given an equal volume of saline served as controls. The numbers of vomiting and retching increased dose-dependently in both dogs and ferrets, and there was no difference in latency and numbers of vomiting between them. The numbers of retching were greater in ferrets than in dogs at > or = 0.25 ml/kg. Taking these results into consideration, the ferret seems to be as useful as the dog in studies on emetic effects of ipecac syrup.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Pain, nausea and vomiting are frequently listed by patients as their most important perioperative concerns. With the change in emphasis from an inpatient to outpatient hospital and office-based medical/surgical environment, there has been increased interest in the 'big little problem' of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Currently, the overall incidence of PONV is estimated to be 25 to 30%, with severe, intractable PONV estimated to occur in approximately 0.18% of all patients undergoing surgery. PONV can lead to delayed postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery room discharge and unanticipated hospital admission, thereby increasing medical costs. The aetiology and consequences of PONV are complex and multifactorial, with patient-, medical- and surgery-related factors. A thorough understanding of these factors, as well as the neuropharmacology of multiple emetic receptors [dopaminergic, muscarinic, cholinergic, opioid, histamine, serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine; 5-HT)] and physiology [cranial nerves VIII (acoustic-vestibular), IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagus), gastrointestinal reflex] relating to PONV are necessary to most effectively manage PONV. Commonly used older, traditional antiemetics for PONV include the anticholinergics (scopolamine), phenothiazines (promethazine), antihistamines (diphenhydramine), butyrophenones (droperidol) and benzamides (metoclopramide). These antiemetics have adverse effects such as dry mouth, sedation, hypotension, extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonic effects and restlessness. The newest class of antiemetics used for the prevention and treatment of PONV are the serotonin receptor antagonists (ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron, dolasetron). These antiemetics do not have the adverse effects of the older, traditional antiemetics. Headache and dizziness are the main adverse effects of the serotonin receptor antagonists in the dosages used for PONV. The serotonin receptor antagonists have improved antiemetic effectiveness but are not as completely efficacious for PONV as they are for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Older, traditional antiemetics (such as droperidol) compare favourably with the serotonin receptor antagonists regarding efficacy for PONV prevention. Combination antiemetic therapy improves efficacy for PONV prevention and treatment. In the difficult-to-treat PONV patient (as in the chemotherapy patient), suppression of numerous emetogenic peripheral stimuli and central neuroemetic receptors may be necessary. This multimodal PONV management approach includes use of: (i) multiple different antiemetic medications (double or triple combination antiemetic therapy acting at different neuroreceptor sites); (ii) less emetogenic anaesthesia techniques; (iii) adequate intravenous hydration; and (iv) adequate pain control.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy of granisetron for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing breast surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing general anaesthesia for breast surgery are especially at risk of experiencing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of granisetron, a selective serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study carried out in a university-affiliated teaching hospital. The study included women who experienced nausea lasting >10 minutes and/or vomiting during the first 3 hours after recovery from anaesthesia for breast surgery. Patients intravenously received either placebo or granisetron at four different doses (10 microg/kg, 20 microg/kg, 40 microg/kg and 80 microg/kg). Patients were observed for 24 hours after administration of the study drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: A total of 100 women were enrolled in this study. Complete control of established PONV, defined as no emetic symptoms and no need for a rescue antiemetic, was observed in 50% of women receiving granisetron 10 microg/kg (p = 0.5 vs placebo), 85% of women receiving granisetron 20 microg/kg (p = 0.009 vs placebo), 90% of women receiving granisetron 40 microg/kg (p = 0.003 vs placebo), and 85% of women receiving granisetron 80 microg/kg (p = 0.009 vs placebo), compared with 45% of placebo recipients. The efficacies of granisetron 20 microg/kg, granisetron 40 microg/kg, and granisetron 80 microg/kg for the treatment of established PONV were superior to that of granisetron 10 microg/kg (all p < 0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: The minimum effective dose of granisetron for the treatment of PONV in women undergoing breast surgery was 20 microg/kg. Increasing the granisetron dose to 80 microg/kg provided no further benefit.

Antiemetics↗