Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

FOXO1 represses peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma1 and -gamma2 gene promoters in primary adipocytes. A novel paradigm to increase insulin sensitivity.

FOXO1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) are crucial transcription factors that regulate glucose metabolism and insulin responsiveness in insulin target tissues. We have shown that, in primary rat adipocytes, both factors regulate transcription of the insulin-responsive GLUT4 gene and that PPARgamma2 detachment from the GLUT4 promoter upon thiazolidinedione binding up-regulates GLUT4 gene expression, thus increasing insulin sensitivity (Armoni, M., Kritz, N., Harel, C., Bar-Yoseph, F., Chen, H., Quon, M. J., and Karnieli, E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 30614-30623). However, the mechanisms regulating PPARgamma gene transcription are largely unknown. We studied the effects of FOXO1 on human PPARgamma gene expression in primary rat adipocytes and found that both genes are endogenously expressed. FOXO1 coexpression dose-dependently repressed transcription from either the PPARgamma 1 or PPARgamma2 promoter reporter by 65%, whereas insulin (100 nm, 20-24 h) either partially or completely reversed this effect. Phosphorylation-defective FOXO1 mutants T24A, S256A, S319A, and T24A/S256A/S319A still repressed the PPARgamma1 promoter and partially lost their effects on the PPARgamma2 promoter in either basal or insulin-stimulated cells. Use of DNA binding-defective FOXO1 (H215R) indicated that this domain is crucial for FOXO1 repression of the PPARgamma2 (but not PPARgamma1) promoter. Progressive 5'-deletion and gel retardation analyses revealed that this repression involves direct and specific binding of FOXO1 to the PPARgamma2 promoter; chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed that this binding occurs in cellulo. We suggest a novel paradigm to increase insulin sensitivity in adipocytes in which FOXO1 repression of PPARgamma, the latter being a repressor of the GLUT4 promoter, consequently leads to GLUT4 derepression/up-regulation, thus enhancing cellular insulin sensitivity. The newly identified FOXO1-binding site on the PPARgamma2 promoter may serve as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2001

The role of the Src homology 3-Src homology 2 interface in the regulation of Src kinases.

The regulatory fragment of Src kinases, comprising Src homology (SH) 3 and SH2 domains, is responsible for controlled repression of kinase activity. We have used a multidisciplinary approach involving crystallography, NMR, and isothermal titration calorimetry to study the regulatory fragment of Fyn (FynSH32) and its interaction with a physiological activator: a fragment of focal adhesion kinase that contains both phosphotyrosine and polyproline motifs. Although flexible, the preferred disposition of SH3 and SH2 domains in FynSH32 resembles the inactive forms of Hck and Src, differing significantly from LckSH32. This difference, which results from variation in the SH3-SH2 linker sequences, will affect the potential of the regulatory fragments to repress kinase activity. This surprising result implies that the mechanism of repression of Src family members may vary, explaining functional distinctions between Fyn and Lck. The interaction between FynSH32 and focal adhesion kinase is restricted to the canonical SH3 and SH2 binding sites and does not affect the dynamic independence of the two domains. Consequently, the interaction shows no enhancement by an avidity effect. Such an interaction may have evolved to gain specificity through an extended recognition site while maintaining rapid dissociation after signaling.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

A novel mechanism of repression of the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter, by single strand DNA binding cold shock domain (Y-box) proteins in normoxic fibroblasts.

Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is implicated in a number of diseases. It is therefore critical that mechanisms exist to strictly regulate VEGF expression. A hypoxia-responsive (HR) region of the VEGF promoter which binds the HIF-1 transcription factor is a target for many signals that up-regulate VEGF transcription. Repressors targeting the HIF-1 transcription factor have been identified but no repressors directly binding the HR promoter region had been reported. We now report a novel mechanism of repression of the VEGF HR region involving DNA binding. We find that single strand DNA-specific cold shock domain (CSD or Y-box) proteins repress the HR region via a binding site downstream of the HIF-1 site. The repressor site is functional in unstimulated, normoxic fibroblasts and represents a novel means to prevent expression of VEGF in the absence of appropriate stimuli. We characterized complexes forming on the VEGF repressor site and identified a previously unreported nuclear CSD protein complex containing dbpA. Nuclear dbpA appears to bind as a dimer and we determined a means by which nuclear CSD proteins may enter double strand DNA to bind to their single strand sites to bring about repression of the VEGF HR region.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2004

A new Hansenula polymorpha HAP4 homologue which contains only the N-terminal conserved domain of the protein is fully functional in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the HAP transcriptional complex is involved in the fermentation-respiration shift. This complex is composed of four subunits. Three subunits are necessary for DNA-binding, whereas the Hap4p subunit, glucose-repressed, contains the transcriptional activation domain. Hap4p is the key regulator of the complex activity in response to carbon sources in S. cerevisiae. To date, no HAP4 homologue has been identified, except in Kluyveromyces lactis. Examination of these two HAP4 sequences led to the identification of two very short conserved peptides also identified in other yeasts. In the yeast Hansenula polymorpha, two possible HAP4 homologues have been found. Their deduced amino acid sequences are similar to the ScHap4p and KlHap4p proteins only in the N-terminal 16-amino-acid basic motif. Since molecular genetic tools exist and complete genome sequence is known for this yeast, we expressed one of these putative HpHap4 proteins in S. cerevisiae and showed that this protein is able to restore the growth defect of the S. cerevisiae hap4-deleted strain. A set of experiments was performed to confirm the functional homology of this new gene with ScHAP4. The discovery of a Hap4-regulatory protein in H. polymorpha with only the N-terminal conserved domain of the S. cerevisiae protein indicates that this domain may play a crucial role during evolution.

CCAAT-Binding Factor↗
PubMed2000

pRB-dependent, J domain-independent function of simian virus 40 large T antigen in override of p53 growth suppression.

Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen (LT) can immortalize and transform many cell types. These activities are attributed in large part to the binding and functional inactivation by LT of two major tumor suppressors: p53 and the retinoblastoma protein, pRB. Most effects of LT on pRB have been shown to additionally require an intact J domain, which mediates binding to Hsc70. We show here that the J domain is not required for p53 override in full-length LT. Although LT binds p53, it was shown previously that overcoming a p53-induced cell cycle arrest requires binding to pRB family members (R. S. Quartin et al., J. Virol. 68:1334-1341). We demonstrate that an LT mutant defective for pRB family member binding (K1) can be complemented for efficient override of p53 arrest by a construct encoding the first 135 amino acids of LT with a J domain-inactivating mutation, H42Q. Hence, complementation does not require the J domain, and pRB binding by LT is important for more than dissociating pRB-E2F complexes, which is J dependent. In accordance with this notion, LT alleviates pRB small-pocket-mediated transcriptional repression independently of the J domain. The LT K1 mutant can also be complemented for p53 override by small t antigen (st) in a manner independent of its J domain. Our observations underscore the importance of multiple SV40 functions, two in LT and one in st, that act cooperatively to counteract p53 growth suppression.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Differential role of Sp100 isoforms in interferon-mediated repression of herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein expression.

Nuclear domains called ND10 or PML nuclear bodies contain interferon (IFN)-upregulated proteins like PML and Sp100. Paradoxically, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) begins its transcriptional cascade at aggregates of ND10-associated proteins, which in turn are destroyed by the HSV-1 immediate-early protein ICP0. While PML is essential in the formation of ND10, the function of Sp100 in the cells' defense against viral infection is unknown. In this study we investigated the potential antiviral effect of IFN-beta-induced Sp100. We found that IFN-beta treatment leads to a differential accumulation of four Sp100 isoforms in different cell lines. Using an HEK293 cell line derivative, 293-S, producing no detectable amounts of Sp100 even after IFN exposure, we analyzed individual Sp100 isoforms for their effect on HSV-1 infection. Sp100 isoforms B, C, and HMG, but not Sp100A, suppressed ICP0 and ICP4 early after infection. Isoforms B, C, and HMG suppressed expression from the ICP0 promoter in transient transfection, whereas Sp100A enhanced expression. Moreover, Sp100A localized in ND10, whereas the repressive isoforms were either dispersed within the nucleus or, at unphysiologically higher expression levels, formed new aggregates. The repressive activity was dependent on an intact SAND domain, since Sp100B bearing a W655Q mutation in the SAND domain lost this repressive activity and accumulated in ND10. Using RNA interference to knock down the repressive Sp100 isoforms B, C, and HMG, we find that they are an essential part of the IFN-beta-mediated suppression of ICP0 expression. These data suggest that repression by the Sp100 isoforms B, C, and HMG takes place outside of ND10 and raise the possibility that viral genomes at Sp100A accumulations are more likely to start their transcription program because of a more permissive local environment.

Antigens, Nuclear↗
PubMed2006

APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact with SEUSS to mediate transcription repression during flower development.

The transcriptional repression of key regulatory genes is crucial for plant and animal development. Previously, we identified and isolated two Arabidopsis transcription co-repressors LEUNIG (LUG) and SEUSS (SEU) that function together in a putative co-repressor complex to prevent ectopic AGAMOUS (AG) transcription in flowers. Because neither LUG nor SEU possesses a recognizable DNA-binding motif, how they are tethered to specific target promoters remains unknown. Using the yeast two-hybrid assay and a co-immunoprecipitation assay, we showed that APETALA1 (AP1) and SEPALLATA3 (SEP3), both MADS box DNA-binding proteins, interacted with SEU. The AP1-SEU protein-protein interaction was supported by synergistic genetic interactions between ap1 and seu mutations. The role of SEU proteins in bridging the interaction between AP1/SEP3 and LUG to repress target gene transcription was further demonstrated in yeast and plant cells, providing important mechanistic insights into co-repressor function in plants. Furthermore, a direct in vivo association of SEU proteins with the AG cis-regulatory element was shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Accordingly, a reporter gene driven by the AG cis-element was able to respond to AP1- and SEP3-mediated transcriptional repression in a transient plant cell system when supplied with SEU and LUG. These results suggest that AP1 and SEP3 may serve as the DNA-binding partners of SEU/LUG. Our demonstration of the direct physical interaction between SEU and the C-terminal domain of SEP3 and AP1 suggests that AP1 and SEP3 MADS box proteins may interact with positive, as well as negative, regulatory proteins via their C-terminal domains, to either stimulate or repress their regulatory targets.

Arabidopsis Proteins↗
PubMed1995

Isolation and characterization of a novel zinc-finger protein with transcription repressor activity.

To identify genes that can repress the expression of growth regulatory molecules, a human fetal cDNA library was screened with a degenerate oligonucleotide that corresponds to the conserved stretch of 6 amino acids connecting successive zinc-finger regions in the Wilms' tumor suppressor/Egr-1 family of DNA-binding proteins. One clone, designated zinc-finger protein 174 (ZNF174), corresponds to a putative transcription factor with three zinc fingers and a novel finger-associated domain, designated the SCAN box. The three Cys2-His2-type zinc fingers are positioned at the carboxyl terminus, while the 65-amino acid finger-associated SCAN box is located near the amino terminus. Chromosomal localization using somatic cell hybrid analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization mapped the gene for ZNF174 to human chromosome 16p13.3. The 2.5-kilobase transcript from this gene is expressed in a variety of human organs, but most strongly in adult testis and ovary. Fusion of the upstream regulatory region of ZNF174 to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 revealed that the gene could confer a repression function on the heterologous DNA-binding domain. ZNF174 selectively repressed reporter activity driven by the platelet-derived growth factor-B chain and transforming growth factor-beta 1 promoters and bound to DNA in a specific manner. This member of the C2H2-type zinc-finger family is a novel transcriptional repressor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

p53-dependent down-regulation of telomerase is mediated by p21waf1.

Inactivation of p53 and activation of telomerase occur in the majority of human cancers, raising the possibility of a link between these two pathways. Overexpression of wild-type p53 down-regulates the enzymatic activity of telomerase in various cancer cell lines through transcriptional repression of its catalytic subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). In this study, we re-evaluated the role of p53 in telomerase regulation using isogenic cell lines expressing physiological levels of p53. We demonstrate that endogenous wild-type p53 was able to down-regulate telomerase activity, hTERT mRNA levels, and promoter activity; however, the ability to repress hTERT expression was found to be cell type-specific. The integrity of the DNA-binding core domain, the N-terminal transactivation domain, and the C-terminal oligomerization domains of p53 was essential for hTERT promoter repression, whereas the proline-rich domain and the extreme C terminus were not required. Southwestern and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated lack of p53 binding to the hTERT promoter, raising the possibility of an indirect repressive mechanism. The down-regulation of hTERT promoter activity was abolished by a dominant-negative E2F1 mutant. Mutational analysis identified a specific E2F site responsible for p53-mediated repression. Knockdown of the key p53 transcriptional target, p21, was sufficient to eliminate the p53-dependent repression of hTERT. Inactivation of the Rb family using either viral oncoproteins or RNA interference attenuated the repression. Inhibition of histone deacetylases also interfered with the repression of hTERT by p53. Therefore, our results suggest that repression of hTERT by endogenous p53 is mediated by p21 and E2F.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2001

A novel domain of the yeast heat shock factor that regulates its activation function.

Heat shock factor Hsf1 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to the heat shock element (HSE) of a subset of genes and activates their transcription in response to various environmental stresses. Hsf1 protein contains discrete domains respectively involved in DNA-binding, trimerization, transcription activation, and transcription repression. Here we have identified a novel domain rich in basic amino acids at the extreme C-terminus of Hsf1. Deletion or point mutations of the C-terminal basic region caused an inefficient heat shock response of genes containing noncanonical HSEs such as CUP1 and HSP26. The basic region is also essential for oxidative stress-inducible transcription of CUP1 by Hsf1. By contrast, it was dispensable for heat induction through the canonical HSE. We suggest that the basic region is a modulator involved in regulation of the Hsf1-mediated activation depending on the architecture of its binding site.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed1998

Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription.

The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) silences specific genes that are active in the S phase of the cell cycle and which are regulated by E2F transcription factors. Rb binds to the activation domain of E2F and then actively represses the promoter by a mechanism that is poorly understood. Here we show that Rb associates with a histone deacetylase, HDAC1, through the Rb 'pocket' domain. Association with the deacetylase is reduced by naturally occurring mutations in the pocket and by binding of the human papilloma virus oncoprotein E7. We find that Rb can recruit histone deacetylase to E2F and that Rb cooperates with HDAC1 to repress the E2F-regulated promoter of the gene encoding the cell-cycle protein cyclin E. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A (TSA) inhibits Rb-mediated repression of a chromosomally integrated E2F-regulated promoter. Our results indicate that histone deacetylases are important for regulating the cell cycle and that active transcriptional repression by Rb may involve the modification of chromatin structure.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

The c-jun proto-oncogene down-regulates the rat alpha-fetoprotein promoter in HepG2 hepatoma cells without binding to DNA.

The effects of a phorbol ester (TPA) and of members of the Jun and Fos oncoprotein family on the activity of the rat alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) promoter were checked by using transient expression experiments in HepG2 hepatoma cells. TPA blocked the activity of the rat AFP promoter in a dose-dependent manner. Overexpression of c-Jun specifically repressed the rat AFP promoter but not the albumin promoter. JunB and JunD were poorer inhibitors. c-Fos expression did not potentiate the negative effect of Jun. The Jun-induced repression does not require binding of c-Jun to the AFP promoter. DNase 1 footprinting experiments did not display any high affinity binding site for Jun on the AFP promoter. Integrity of the c-Jun DNA binding domain is not required for the c-Jun protein to block the AFP promoter. The N-terminal part of Jun, which contains the activating domain, is responsible for the repression as shown by using Jun-Gal4 chimera. Jun likely exerts its negative control on the AFP promoter via protein-protein interactions with a not yet identified trans-activating factor within the -134 to +6 region or with a component of the general machinery of transcription. Jun proteins can thus be key intermediates in regulatory cascades which result in the differential modulation of the AFP and albumin gene expression in the course of liver development and carcinogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cti6, a PHD domain protein, bridges the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor and the SAGA coactivator to overcome repression at GAL1.

The yeast Cyc8 and Tup1 proteins form a corepressor complex that, when tethered to DNA, turns off transcription. Release of the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor from a promoter has been considered as a prerequisite for subsequent transcriptional activation. Contrasting this, we demonstrate that Cyc8-Tup1 is continuously associated with target promoters under both repressive and inducing conditions. At the GAL1 promoter, Cyc8-Tup1 facilitates recruitment of SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltranferase) via Cti6, a PHD domain protein that physically links the Cyc8-Tup1 and SAGA complexes. Lack of functional corepressor renders GAL1 transcription largely independent of specific SAGA subunits. Thus, corepressor's release is not the mechanism of derepression; instead, it is the coactivator complex that alleviates Cyc8-Tup1-mediated repression under induction conditions.

DNA-Binding Proteins↗
PubMed1998

TIF1alpha: a possible link between KRAB zinc finger proteins and nuclear receptors.

Ligand-induced gene activation by nuclear receptors (NRs) is thought to be mediated by transcriptional intermediary factors (TIFs), that interact with their ligand-dependent AF-2 activating domain. Included in the group of the putative AF-2 TIFs identified so far is TIF1alpha, a member of a new family of proteins which contains an N-terminal RBCC (RING finger-B boxes-coiled coil) motif and a C-terminal bromodomain preceded by a PHD finger. In addition to these conserved domains present in a number of transcriptional regulatory proteins, TIF1alpha was found to contain several protein-protein interaction sites. Of these, one specifically interacts with NRs bound to their agonistic ligand and not with NR mutants that are defective in the AF-2 activity. Immediately adjacent to this 'NR box', TIF1alpha contains an interaction site for members of the chromatin organization modifier (chromo) family, HP1alpha and MOD1, which both are heterochromatinic proteins. Finally, TIF1alpha also has a binding site for KRAB silencing domains of C2H2 zinc finger proteins. TIF1beta, another member of the TIF1 gene family, has some interacting partners in common with TIF1alpha. TIF1beta can interact with HP1alpha, MOD1 and KRAB domains, but apparently not with NRs. Both TIF1alpha and TIF1beta repress transcription when fused to a DNA binding domain in transiently transfected mammalian cells. A model discussing the potential function(s) of TIF1s in the control of transcription at the level of the chromatin template will be presented.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep protein acts as both a repressor and an activator to regulate AAV transcription during a productive infection.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) uses three promoters, p5, p19, and p40, to regulate viral gene expression. The p5 and p19 promoters direct the synthesis of the viral regulatory proteins, Rep78 and -68 and Rep52 and -40, respectively. The p5 Rep proteins bind a linear 22-bp sequence, the Rep binding element (RBE), that is within both the terminal repeat (TR) and the p5 promoter. In the absence of helper virus, all four Rep proteins have been shown to reduce transcription from the viral p5 and p19 promoters. In this report, we focus on the roles of these proteins and the RBEs in controlling transcription during a productive infection, that is, in the presence of adenovirus. We find that in the presence of adenovirus, the p5 RBE represses p5 transcription while the RBE in the TR activates p5. However, both the TR RBE and the p5 RBE transactivate the p19 and p40 promoters. The fact that the p5 RBE-Rep complex can transactivate p19 and p40 while repressing p5 suggests that Rep78/68 is both a repressor and a transactivator. Rep repression of p5 is specific for the p5 RBE, as other p5 promoter elements do not support this activity. We also demonstrate that in the presence of adenovirus, the p19 Rep proteins, which do not bind to the RBE, can eliminate repression of the p5 promoter by Rep78 and Rep68. This may occur by the association of Rep52 with Rep78 or Rep68 to produce a Rep78/68-Rep52 protein complex which can be detected in vivo by immunoprecipitation. Finally, two Rep mutants that were deficient in RBE binding and transactivation but positive for p5 repression were identified. These mutants may define interaction domains involved in making contacts with other proteins that facilitate repression. These observations suggest a mechanism for controlling the p5 and p19 mRNA levels during a productive AAV infection.

DNA Helicases↗
PubMed1992

Divergent regulation of the human atrial natriuretic peptide gene by c-jun and c-fos.

Employing transient transfection analysis in neonatal rat cardiocytes, we have demonstrated that overexpression of c-jun results in a dose-dependent induction of the human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP) gene promoter. Studies using a series of mutations in the hANP gene promoter identified a TRE-like, cis-acting regulatory sequence which conferred c-jun sensitivity. This same region was shown to interact with the c-jun/c-fos complex in an in vitro gel mobility shift assay. Selective mutation of this site suppressed basal activity of the hANP promoter and significantly reduced c-jun-dependent activation. Overexpression of c-fos had a biphasic effect on hANP gene promoter activity. At low levels, in concert with c-jun, it activated, while at higher levels it suppressed, transcription from the hANP gene promoter. This inhibition was both cell and promoter specific. hANP gene promoter sequences which mediate c-fos-dependent inhibition appear to be separable from those responsible for the induction. In addition, the protein domains on c-fos responsible for transcriptional activation and repression can be segregated topographically, with the inhibitory activity being localized to the carboxy-terminal domain. Thus, c-fos can activate or repress hANP gene expression through two separate functional domains that act on distinct regulatory elements in the hANP gene promoter. These data imply that the ANP gene may be a physiological target for c-fos- and c-jun-dependent activity in the heart and suggest a potential mechanism linking environmental stimuli to its expression.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Transcriptional repression of the interleukin-2 gene by vitamin D3: direct inhibition of NFATp/AP-1 complex formation by a nuclear hormone receptor.

T-lymphocyte proliferation is suppressed by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], the active metabolite of vitamin D3, and is associated with a decrease in interleukin 2 (IL-2), gamma interferon, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mRNA levels. We report here that 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated repression in Jurkat cells is cycloheximide resistant, suggesting that it is a direct transcriptional repressive effect on IL-2 expression by the vitamin D3 receptor (VDR). We therefore examined vitamin D3-mediated repression of activated IL-2 expression by cotransfecting Jurkat cells with IL-2 promoter/reporter constructs and a VDR overexpression vector and by DNA binding. We delineated an element conferring both DNA binding by the receptor in vitro and 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated repression in vivo to a short 40-bp region encompassing an important positive regulatory element, NF-AT-1, which is bound by a T-cell-specific transcription factor, NFATp, as well as by AP-1. VDR DNA-binding mutants were unable to either bind to this element in vitro or repress in vivo; the VDR DNA-binding domain alone, however, bound the element but also could not repress IL-2 expression. These results indicate that DNA binding by VDR is necessary but not sufficient to mediate IL-2 repression. By combining partially purified proteins in vitro, we observed the loss of the bound NFATp/AP-1-DNA complex upon inclusion of VDR or VDR-retinoid X receptor. Order of addition and off-rate experiments indicate that the VDR-retinoid X receptor heterodimer blocks NFATp/AP-1 complex formation and then stably associates with the NF-AT-1 element. This direct inhibition by a nuclear hormone receptor of transcriptional activators of the IL-2 gene may provide a mechanistic explanation of how vitamin derivatives can act as potent immunosuppressive agents.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Transcriptional regulation of the methuselah gene by dorsal protein in Drosophila melanogaster.

The Drosophila methuselah (mth) mutant has an approximately 35 percent increase in average lifespan, and enhanced resistance to various forms of stress, including starvation, high temperature, and dietary paraquat. To examine the transcriptional regulation of mth, we used luciferase assays employing Drosophila S2 cells. Two positive control elements were found at -542 to -272 (PE1) and +28 to +217 (PE2), where putative binding sites for transcription factors including Dorsal (Dl) were identified. Cotransfection of a Dl expression plasmid with a mth-luciferase reporter plasmid resulted in decreased reporter activity. PE1 and PE2, the minimal elements for strong promoter activity, were required for maximal repression by Dl protein. The N-terminal Rel homology domain (RHD) of Dl was not sufficient for repression of mth. We demonstrated by chromatin affinity precipitation (ChAP) assays in S2 cells that Dl bound to the putative PE1 binding site. Unexpectedly, semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the level of mth transcripts was reduced in dl flies. However, the in vivo result support the view that mth expression is regulated by dl, since it is well known that Dl functions as both a transcriptional activator and repressor depending on what other transcription factors are present. These findings suggest that both innate immunity and resistance to stress are controlled by Dl protein.

Animals↗