Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

A randomized trial comparing heater probe plus thrombin with heater probe plus placebo for bleeding peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial compared the efficacy of combined endoscopic hemostatic treatment using the heater probe plus thrombin injection with that of the heater probe plus placebo injection as treatment for peptic ulcers with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels. Efficacy was defined in terms of primary hemostasis, prevention of rebleeding, and need for urgent surgery. METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients presenting with major peptic ulcer bleeding were randomized to heater probe plus thrombin or to heater probe plus placebo. The groups were well matched for all risk categories including age, endoscopic stigmata, shock, and severity of comorbid diseases. Endoscopic therapy was applied using the heater probe followed by injection of thrombin or placebo. RESULTS: Successful primary hemostasis was achieved in 97% of patients. Rebleeding developed in 19 (15%) of thrombin plus heater probe patients and 17 (15%) of placebo plus heater probe patients. Emergency surgery was necessary in 16 and 13 patients, respectively. Eight patients in the thrombin group had adverse events compared with 4 in the placebo group. Eight (6%) of thrombin plus heater probe patients and 14 (12%) of placebo plus heater probe patients died (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of thrombin and the heater probe does not confer an additional benefit over heater probe and placebo as endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Our trial does not support the use of this combination of hemostatic therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Randomized, prospective double-blind trial of metoclopramide and placebo for gastroesophageal reflux in infants.

The effect of metoclopramide on gastroesophageal reflux was studied in 30 infants less than 1 year of age. Gastroesophageal reflux was documented in all infants by extended pH monitoring before enrollment in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive metoclopramide 0.1 mg/kg or placebo four times a day, 1/2 hour before feeding for 1 week, followed by the alternate regimen for 1 week. The infants were reevaluated with extended pH monitoring and scintigraphy after 4 to 7 days of each treatment. A symptom score was derived by determining the average number of occurrences of all symptoms recorded daily by parents on a symptom checklist during pretreatment, placebo, and metoclopramide treatment periods. There was a difference between pretreatment evaluation and placebo periods with respect to daily symptom scores (p less than 0.005), reflecting a significant placebo response. However, no difference in scintigraphic study was found between placebo and metoclopramide periods. A significant difference between placebo and metoclopramide periods was noted in the percentage of time esophageal pH was less than 4.0 (p less than 0.001). However, although metoclopramide decreased the proportion of time esophageal pH was less than 4.0, pH remained less than 4.0 for more than 5% of the time in most patients. Substratification of the total group into infants younger and older than 3 months revealed that older infants had greater average daily weight gain during the metoclopramide treatment period (34.3 gm/day) than in the placebo treatment period (6.6 gm/day, p = 0.05). We conclude that metoclopramide in the dosage 0.1 mg/kg four times daily reduces reflux in infants and may be useful for infants with poor weight gain and other serious complications of gastroesophageal reflux.

Body Weight↗
PubMed1995

Outcome at 1-year adjusted age of 957 infants weighing more than 1250 grams with respiratory distress syndrome randomized to receive synthetic surfactant or air placebo. American and Canadian Exosurf Neonatal Study Groups.

This study determined outcomes at 12-months adjusted age of 957 infants weighing more than 1250 gm at birth who were subjects in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of synthetic surfactant or air placebo administered in a rescue trial at 23 hospitals in the United States and 13 hospitals in Canada. Follow-up results were available for 475 of 563 surviving infants who received air placebo (84%) and 482 of 571 infants who received synthetic surfactant (84%). Developmental outcome was equivalent in the two groups. Morbidity was less in the synthetic surfactant group as assessed by the need for medication for chronic lung disease (52 of 475 (11%) for the air placebo group vs 32 of 482 (7%) for the synthetic surfactant group) or respiratory support (10 of 475 (2%) for the air placebo group vs 1 of 482 (< 1%) for the synthetic surfactant group) at 1-year adjusted age. Bayley Scales of Infant Development (mental development Index: 102 for both the air placebo and synthetic surfactant groups; psychomotor development index: 95 for the air placebo group vs 94 for the synthetic surfactant group) and impairment rates (94 of 475 (20%) for the air placebo group vs 86 of 482 (18%) for the synthetic surfactant group) were similar in the two groups. Infants weighing more than 1250 gm who have respiratory distress syndrome have previously been shown to have improved survival rates and lower neonatal morbidity after treatment with synthetic surfactant. These follow-up data confirm that developmental outcome as determined at 12-months adjusted age is at least as good in those receiving synthetic surfactant.

Air↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Duloxetine 60 mg once daily dosing versus placebo in the acute treatment of major depression.

Existing therapies for major depressive disorder (MDD) have either limited efficacy and/or poor tolerability. The present study examined the effects of duloxetine, a potent and balanced dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE), in patients with MDD. Adult patients (N = 267) with MDD were randomly assigned to receive duloxetine (60 mg/day) or placebo in this 9-week, multi-center, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Efficacy was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)), Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), Patient's Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). Safety was evaluated by assessing discontinuation rates, adverse event rates, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Duloxetine (60 mg QD) significantly reduced the HAMD(17) total score compared with placebo at the end of 9-week therapy. Estimated probabilities of response and remission were 65 and 43%, respectively, for duloxetine compared with 42 and 28% for placebo. Duloxetine also reduced overall pain, back pain, shoulder pain and time in pain while awake significantly more than placebo. Global measures of improvement, including PGI-I and QLDS, were significantly improved by duloxetine compared with placebo. Discontinuations due to adverse events were more frequent for duloxetine-treated patients (12.5%) than for placebo-treated patients (4.3%). Nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, and constipation were more frequent for duloxetine than placebo. There was no significant incidence of hypertension, nor any other safety issues. Duloxetine 60 mg administered once daily appears to be a safe and effective treatment for MDD.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Aprotinin in primary valve replacement and reconstruction: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients having cardiac operations often require blood transfusions. Aprotinin reduces the need for blood transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft operations. To determine the safety and effectiveness of aprotinin in reducing the use of allogeneic blood and postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage, we studied 212 patients undergoing primary sternotomy for valve replacement or repair. METHODS: This study was multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Patients received high-dose aprotinin (n = 71), low-dose aprotinin (n = 70), or placebo (n = 71). The study medication was given as a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion and pump prime dose. Heparin administration was standardized. Transfusions, postoperative mediastinal shed blood, and adverse events were tracked. RESULTS: Demographic profiles were similar among the treatment groups. Aprotinin did not decrease the percentage of patients receiving transfusions when compared with placebo (high-dose aprotinin, 63%, p = 0.092; low-dose aprotinin, 52%, p = 0.592; placebo, 48%). Aprotinin was associated with a reduction in the volume of mediastinal shed blood (high-dose aprotinin vs placebo, p = 0.002; low-dose aprotinin vs placebo, p = 0.017). Adverse events were equally distributed among the treatment groups except for postoperative renal dysfunction (high-dose aprotinin, 11%; low-dose aprotinin, 7%; placebo, 0%; p = 0.01). A disproportionate number of patients in the high-dose aprotinin group with postoperative renal dysfunction also had diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment in this population did not reduce allogeneic blood use, although there were significant reductions in the volume of mediastinal shed blood.

Aprotinin↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine, sertraline and clomipramine in patients with premature ejaculation: a double-blind, placebo controlled study.

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine, sertraline, clomipramine and placebo for the oral pharmacotherapy of premature ejaculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 36 men (mean age 44 years) who had intravaginal ejaculation latency of less than 2 minutes. Patients took each of 3 drugs and the placebo consecutively during a 4-week period per each agent. Efficacy and side effects data were obtained by a self-reported patient questionnaire that rated intravaginal ejaculation latency, sexual satisfaction of patient and partner, and possible side effects. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment with placebo, fluoxetine, sertraline and clomipramine the mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time was significantly increased from 46 seconds to 2.27 minutes, 2.30 minutes, 4.27 minutes and 5.75 minutes, respectively (all p <0.01). However, treatment with clomipramine or sertraline caused a greater increase in mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time than fluoxetine or placebo (p <0.01). Patient sexual satisfaction rate after treatment with clomipramine was significantly higher (p <0.05) than with sertraline, fluoxetine or placebo. Partner sexual satisfaction rate was also higher with clomipramine than with sertraline or fluoxetine but no statistical difference was found. The incidence of side effects with clomipramine was significantly higher (p <0.05) compared to that of fluoxetine, sertraline and placebo, while no significant difference among sertraline, fluoxetine and placebo was noted. CONCLUSIONS: In men with premature ejaculation clomipramine was the most useful drug in terms of efficacy. Treatment with sertraline was nearly as effective and had a lower incidence of side effects.

1-Naphthylamine↗
PubMed2001

Effects of respiratory muscle training versus placebo on endurance exercise performance.

We evaluated the effects of a 5 week (25 sessions); (30-35 min/day, 5 days/week), respiratory muscle training (RMT) program in nine competitive male cyclists. The experimental design included inspiratory resistance strength training (3-5 min/session) and hyperpnea endurance training (30 min/session), a placebo group which used a sham hypoxic trainer (n=8), and three exercise performance tests, including a highly reproducible 8 km time trial test. RMT intensity, measured once a week in terms of accumulated inspiratory pressure and the level of sustainable hyperpnea increased significantly after 5 weeks (+64% and +19%, respectively). The RMT group showed a significant 8% increase in maximal inspiratory pressure (P<0.05) while the placebo group showed only a 3.7% increase (P>0.10). RMT and placebo groups both showed significant increases in the fixed work-rate endurance test performance time (+26% and +16%, respectively) and in the peak work-rate achieved during the incremental maximal oxygen consumption (V(O2)max) test (+9 and +6%). The 8 km time trial performance increased 1.8+/-1.2% (or 15+/-10 sec; P<0.01) in the RMT group with 8 of 9 subjects increasing; the placebo group showed a variable non-significant change in 5 of 8 subjects (-0.3+/-2.7%, P=0.07). The changes observed in these three performance tests were not, however, significantly different between the RMT and placebo groups. Heart rate, ventilation, or venous blood lactate, at equal work-rates during the incremental exercise test or at equal times during the fixed work-rate endurance test were not changed significantly across these exercise trials in either group. We propose that the effect of RMT on exercise performance in highly trained cyclists does not exceed that in a placebo group. Significant placebo and test familiarization effects must be accounted for in experimental designs utilizing performance tests which are critically dependent on volitional effort.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Levofloxacin for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a Canadian multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of levofloxacin therapy compared with placebo in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Uncontrolled studies have supported the use of antibiotics in CP/CPPS. METHODS: Men with a National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnosis of CP/CPPS (specifically, no infection localized to the prostate) were randomized to levofloxacin (500 mg/day) or placebo for 6 weeks in 11 Canadian centers. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks with the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and global patient assessments (subjective global assessment and patient assessment questionnaire). RESULTS: Eighty men (average age 56.0 years, range 36 to 78; duration of symptoms 6.5 years, range 0.6 to 32) were randomized to receive levofloxacin (n = 45) or placebo (n = 35). All were evaluated in an intent-to-treat analysis. Both groups experienced progressive improvement in symptoms as measured by the NIH-CPSI. However, the difference in response was not statistically or clinically significant at end of treatment (6 weeks) or at the end of the follow-up visits (12 weeks). No patients withdrew because of adverse events. One patient withdrew before the 6-week assessment. Adverse events (all mild) were reported in 20% of the levofloxacin group and 17% of the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot placebo-controlled study showed that 6 weeks of levofloxacin therapy in men diagnosed with CP/CPPS resulted in symptom improvement that was not significantly different from that with placebo at end of treatment or follow-up. The clinical ramifications of these findings need to be addressed.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostate-specific antigen in the detection of prostate cancer: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prostate cancer detection and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with finasteride. METHODS: Three thousand forty men 45 to 78 years of age with PSA less than 10 ng/mL and no history of prostate cancer were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to finasteride (n = 1524) or placebo (n = 1516) for up to 4 years. A prerandomization biopsy negative for prostate cancer was obtained in 98% of patients with a screening PSA of 4.0 ng/mL or more, and an end-of-study biopsy was requested of all such patients without a recent second negative biopsy or a prostate cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 644 patients (21%) underwent biopsy and 201 (6.6%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 4.7% of men on finasteride and 5.1% on placebo (P = 0.7). Elevated PSA prompted diagnosis in 35% of cases on finasteride and 34% on placebo. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for last PSA was 0.84 on finasteride and 0.79 on placebo (P = 0.07). Use of an upper limit of normal for last PSA of 2.0 ng/mL for finasteride and 4.0 ng/mL for placebo yielded similar sensitivity (66% versus 70%, P = 0.6), higher specificity (82% versus 74%, P < 0.0001), and a higher likelihood ratio (3.6 versus 2.7, P < 0.05) for finasteride than for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In men treated with finasteride, multiplying PSA by 2 and using normal ranges for untreated men preserves the usefulness of PSA for prostate cancer detection.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10(4) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10(4) CFU/mL) after the procedure (P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) (P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Quercetin in men with category III chronic prostatitis: a preliminary prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) category III chronic prostatitis syndromes (nonbacterial chronic prostatitis and prostatodynia) are common disorders with few effective therapies. Bioflavonoids have recently been shown in an open-label study to improve the symptoms of these disorders in a significant proportion of men. The aim of this study was to confirm these findings in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty men with category IIIa and IIIb chronic pelvic pain syndrome were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or the bioflavonoid quercetin 500 mg twice daily for 1 month. The NIH chronic prostatitis symptom score was used to grade symptoms and the quality-of-life impact at the start and conclusion of the study. In a follow-up unblind, open-label study, 17 additional men received 1 month of a supplement containing quercetin, as well as bromelain and papain (Prosta-O), which enhance bioflavonoid absorption. RESULTS: Two patients in the placebo group refused to complete the study because of worsening symptoms, leaving 13 placebo and 15 bioflavonoid patients for evaluation in the blind study. Both the quercetin and placebo groups were similar in age, symptom duration, and initial symptom score. Patients taking placebo had a mean improvement in NIH symptom score from 20.2 to 18.8 (not significant), while those taking the bioflavonoid had a mean improvement from 21.0 to 13.1 (P = 0.003). Twenty percent of patients taking placebo and 67% of patients taking the bioflavonoid had an improvement of symptoms of at least 25%. In the 17 patients who received Prosta-Q in the open-label study, 82% had at least a 25% improvement in symptom score. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with the bioflavonoid quercetin is well tolerated and provides significant symptomatic improvement in most men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The Hytrin Community Assessment Trial study: a one-year study of terazosin versus placebo in the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. HYCAT Investigator Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of alpha(1)-blockade therapy versus placebo in the treatment of men with moderate to severe symptoms of prostatism in a community-based population under usual care conditions. METHODS: The Hytrin Community Assessment Trial is a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded, 1-year clinical trial, conducted at 15 academic medical centers (regional sites) and 141 private urology practices (satellite sites). A total of 2084 men at least 55 years old with moderate to severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as determined by an American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score (AUA-SS) of 13 or more points and a bother score (AUA-BS) of 8 or more were enrolled. Randomized patients at regional sites were required to have a peak urinary flow rate less that 15 mL/s with voided volume of at least 150 mL. Treatment with terazosin was initiated with 1 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 2 mg daily for 25 days. Thereafter, patients were titrated stepwise to 5 or 10 mg if they failed to achieve a 35% or greater improvement in the AUA-SS. Primary outcome measures were AUA-SS, AUA-BS, BPH Impact Index (BII), disease-specific quality of life (QQL) score, and treatment failure as defined as discontinuation due to persistent or worsening symptoms or need for surgical intervention for BPH. Secondary outcome measures were peak urinary flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume. RESULTS: AUA-SS (0 to 35 point scale) improved from a baseline mean of 20.1 points by 37.8% during terazosin (n=976) and by 18.4% during placebo (n=973) treatment (P<0.001). Similarly, statistically superior improvements were observed in regard to the AUA-BS, BII, and the QQL score in the terazosin-treated patients. Peak urinary flow rate improved from a baseline of 9.6 mL/s (both regional treatment groups) by 2.2 mL/s in the terazosin group (n=137) and by 0.7 mL/s in the placebo group (n=140) (P< or = 0.05). Treatment failure occurred in 11.2% of terazosin- and 25.4% of placebo-treated patients (P<0.001; Kaplan-Meier adjusted withdrawal rates of 365 days). Withdrawal from study drug treatment due to adverse events occurred in 19.7% of terazosin- and 15.2% of placebo-treated patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Terazosin given once daily in a dose ranging from 2 to 10 mg in community-based urology practices under conditions simulating usual care is effective in reducing the symptoms, perception of bother, and the impairment of QQL due to urinary symptoms in men with moderate to severe symptoms of prostatism. This effect is superior to placebo and maintained over 12 months of follow-up. Clinical research outcome studies in BPH can be conducted in community-based practices, thus simulating as closely as possible "usual care" conditions.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

The cost-effectiveness of terazosin and placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and functional status effects of terazosin, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, compared with placebo in the treatment of men with moderate to severe, symptomatic, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of 2084 patients was conducted at 15 academic regional centers and 141 community-based satellite centers. Information about the use of health care resources and non-disease-specific functional status measures was collected by a standardized telephone interview of patients at baseline and every month thereafter for 12 months. Other information, such as American Urologic Association (AUA) disease-specific functional status scores, was obtained from the patient study records. Patients had a mean age of 65.7 years (range, 46 to 94), with a clinical diagnosis of BPH. At baseline men had at least moderate BPH symptoms by AUA Symptom score (13 or more) and Bother Score (8 or more). On entry, patients at regional sites had peak urinary flow rates 15 mL/s or less and total voided urine volumes 150 mL or greater. A total of 1053 patients were randomized to terazosin and 1031 to placebo treatment. Primary outcome measures included payments for all direct medical resource consumption (inpatient care, emergency department care, outpatient care, and medications); changes in three AUA disease-specific functional status indicators, (Symptom, Bother, and Quality of Life scores), and non-disease-specific functional status measures (days of work loss, days of customary activity loss, and days of bed rest). RESULTS: Total payments for health care resource (including study drug medication), adjusted to reflect 1000 patients per treatment group, were $3,781,803 and $3,568,263 in the placebo and terazosin groups, respectively. All three AUA disease-specific functional status scores improved significantly more in the terazosin group than in the placebo group. We found no difference between terazosin and placebo in all three nonspecific functional status measures. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, terazosin therapy for moderate to severe symptomatic BPH results in approximately equivalent payments for direct medical care, better disease-specific functional status improvement, and comparable change in non-disease-specific functional status measures.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Antihistamine premedication in specific cluster immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy treatment in allergic diseases involves a risk of systemic side effects. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 45 patients allergic to pollen to determine whether pretreatment with loratadine could reduce the number and severity of systemic reactions during the dose-increase phase of cluster immunotherapy. METHODS: The patients received cluster immunotherapy with a standardized birch (Betula verrucosa) or grass (Phleum pratense) pollen extract adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide. The immunotherapy schedule involved seven visits and 14 injections to reach a maintenance dose of 100,000 standardized quality units. Loratadine, 10 mg, or placebo tablets were administered 2 hours before the first injection at each visit. RESULTS: A total of 720 injections were given (309 injections in 21 patients receiving loratadine and 411 injections in 24 patients receiving placebo). The median numbers of injections to reach maintenance dose were 15 (range, 14 to 18) in the loratadine group and 16 (range, 14 to 23) in the placebo group (p = 0.037). The numbers of patients with systemic reactions were seven (33%) and 19 (79%) in the loratadine and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Twenty-five reductions caused by systemic reactions were observed in the placebo group in contrast to nine in the loratadine group (p = 0.047). No life-threatening systemic reactions were observed in either group. Systemic reactions were, however, more severe in the placebo group, mainly because of a significantly higher incidence of urticaria (10 vs 1, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with loratadine seems to reduce both the number and severity of systemic reactions in specific cluster immunotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Short-term immunotherapy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of molecular standardized grass and rye allergens in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Short-term immunotherapy (STI) can be beneficial for patients who are noncompliant with long-term specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerance of STI with seven preseasonal injections of molecular standardized allergens from grass and rye pollen has been investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study with 87 patients at 12 German University hospitals. METHODS: Symptoms of the eyes, nose, and bronchi and use of symptomatic drugs were documented daily in diaries by patients with allergic rhinitis to grass and/or rye pollen and without bronchial asthma. Patients were monitored by skin prick test titration and measurement of levels of specific IgE and IgG4. RESULTS: The median nasal score for the 10 weeks with the strongest symptoms during the grass pollen season was significantly lower (p = 0.014) with 35.0 for STI (n = 41) versus 69.0 for placebo (n = 40); the overall symptom score was 54.0 for STI versus 97.5 for placebo (p = 0.020). Only STI-treated patients exposed to less than 40 pollen grains per cubic meter per week showed a significantly lower nasal symptom score of 39.0 versus 75.0 for placebo (p = 0.006); these patients also had fewer nasal symptoms and less use of topical nasal drugs (p < 0.001). The threshold dose in skin prick tests was significantly higher, being 9.06 histamine equivalent for skin prick test (HEP) for STI-treated patients who received the maximum dose (n = 22) versus 4.33 HEP for placebo (p = 0.005). Specific IgE levels were significantly higher, being 55.9 SU/ml for STI versus 39.2 SU/ml for placebo after seven injections (p = 0.006) and level of specific IgG4 was 5.36% for STI versus 1.28% for placebo (p < 0.001). No severe systemic reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: STI with seven preseasonal injections with molecular standardized allergens is effective and well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The monosodium glutamate symptom complex: assessment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Considerable debate swirls about the validity of symptoms described by many people after ingestion of monosodium glutamate (MSG), and the question has remained unresolved largely because of a paucity of well-designed challenge studies. METHODS: We conducted oral challenge studies in self-identified MSG-sensitive subjects to determine whether they had a statistically significant difference in the incidence of their specific symptoms after ingestion of MSG compared with placebo. First, 5 gm MSG or placebo was administered in random sequence in a double-blind fashion. Subjects who reacted only to a single test agent then underwent rechallenge in random sequence in a double-blind fashion with placebo and 1.25, 2.5, and 5 gm MSG. A positive response to challenge was defined as the reproduction of > of 2 of the specific symptoms in a subject ascertained on prechallenge interview. RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects entered the study. On initial challenge, 18 (29.5%) responded to neither MSG nor placebo, 6 (9.8%) to both, 15 (24.6%) to placebo, and 22 (36.1%) to MSG (p = 0.324). Total and average severity of symptoms after ingestion of MSG (374 and 80) were greater than respective values after placebo ingestion (232 and 56; p = 0.026 and 0.018, respectively). Rechallenge revealed an apparent threshold dose for reactivity of 2.5 gm MSG. Headache (p < 0.023), muscle tightness (p < 0.004), numbness/tingling (p < 0.007), general weakness (p < 0.040), and flushing (p < 0.016) occurred more frequently after MSG than placebo ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Oral challenge with MSG reproduced symptoms in alleged sensitive persons. The mechanism of the reaction remains unknown, but symptom characteristics do not support an IgE-mediated mechanism. According to Food and Drug Administration recommendations, the symptoms, originally called the Chinese restaurant syndrome, are better referred to as the MSG symptom complex.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

A placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist. Montelukast Asthma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The cysteinyl leukotrienes are important mediators of bronchial asthma. The clinical effect of montelukast, a potent cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist, was investigated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. METHODS: After a 3-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 343 asthmatic patients (FEV1 40% to 80% of the predicted value with an improvement in FEV1 of at least 15% [absolute value] after receiving inhaled beta-agonists on at least two occasions) were randomly assigned to one of six treatment groups: placebo; 10, 100, or 200 mg once daily montelukast in the evening; or 10 or 50 mg twice daily montelukast for a 6-week, double-blind treatment period followed by a 1-week placebo washout period. All patients used inhaled, short-acting beta-agonists as needed. RESULTS: All montelukast doses caused similar and significant differences compared with placebo in asthma control endpoints. The least-square mean difference between pooled montelukast groups and placebo in the percentage change from baseline in morning FEV1 (10.30%; 95% CI: 5.56 to 15.04), as-needed beta-agonist use (-0.98 puffs; 95% CI: -1.53 to -0.44), morning peak expiratory flow rate (18.80 L/min; 95% CI: 8.62 to 28.98), physicians' and patients' global evaluations, and asthma-specific quality-of-life scores were all significant (p < or = 0.050). The incidence of adverse experiences was not dose related and was similar between placebo and montelukast treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast caused a significant improvement in chronic asthma at an oral, once daily evening dose as low as 10 mg.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel study of 0.2% loteprednol etabonate in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Loteprednol etabonate is a site-active corticosteroid with efficacy and safety in treating ocular inflammation at the 0.5% concentration. Evidence from dose-response studies suggested that the 0.2% concentration might be effective in treating ocular allergy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.2% loteprednol etabonate in reducing the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study. Patients with signs and symptoms of environmental seasonal allergic conjunctivitis received either loteprednol etabonate or placebo bilaterally four times daily for 42 days. RESULTS: Enrolled were 133 patients (66 receiving loteprednol etahonate; 67 receiving placebo). A reduction in severity was seen in both loteprednol etabonate and placebo groups for bulbar conjunctival injection (1.3 vs 0.9 units on a 0 to 3 scale) and itching (3.5 vs 3.1 units on a 0 to 4 scale) over the first 2 weeks. The treatment effect was -0.5 and -0.6 units in favor of loteprednol etabonate (P < .001). Resolution (the proportion of patients with the sign or symptom no longer present) at visit 4 (day 14) strongly favored loteprednol etabonate-treated patients over placebo-treated patients (31% and 9%, and 54% and 38%, for injection and itching, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated. No patients in either treatment group (0 for loteprednol etabonate and 0 for vehicle) had an elevation of intraocular pressure of 10 mm Hg or greater during the 6 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Loteprenol etabonate (0.2%) was more effective than placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Loteprednol etabonate (0.2%) had a safety profile comparable to placebo during this 6-week trial.

Adult↗