Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Histone Modifications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources

Dopamine D2-like antagonists induce chromatin remodeling in striatal neurons through cyclic AMP-protein kinase A and NMDA receptor signaling.

Antipsychotic drugs regulate gene transcription in striatal neurons by blocking dopamine D2-like receptors. Little is known about the underlying changes in chromatin structure, including covalent modifications at histone N-terminal tails that are epigenetic regulators of gene expression. We show that treatment with D2-like antagonists rapidly induces the phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 and the acetylation of H3-lysine 14 in bulk chromatin from striatum and in nuclei of striatal neurons. We find that, in vivo, D2-like antagonist-induced H3 phospho-acetylation is inhibited by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 and by the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor Rp-adenosine 3c',5c'-cyclic monophosphorothioate triethylammonium salt but increased by the PKA activator Sp-adenosine 3c',5c'-cyclic monophosphorothioate triethylammonium salt. Furthermore, in dissociated striatal cultures which lack midbrain and cortical pre-synaptic inputs, H3 phospho-acetylation was induced by glutamate, L-type Ca2+ channel agonists and activators of cAMP-dependent PKA but inhibited by NMDA receptor antagonists or PKA antagonists. The dual modification, H3pS10-acK14, was enriched at genomic sites with active transcription and showed the kinetics of the early response. Together, these results suggest that histone modifications and chromatin structure in striatal neurons are dynamically regulated by dopaminergic and glutamatergic inputs converging on the cellular level. Blockade of D2-like receptors induces H3 phospho-acetylation, H3pS10-acK14, through cAMP-dependent PKA, and post-synaptic NMDA receptor signaling.

Acetylation↗

Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo.

It has been generally accepted that the mammalian embryo starts its development with all cells identical, and only when inside and outside cells form do differences between cells first emerge. However, recent findings show that cells in the mouse embryo can differ in their developmental fate and potency as early as the four-cell stage. These differences depend on the orientation and order of the cleavage divisions that generated them. Because epigenetic marks are suggested to be involved in sustaining pluripotency, we considered that such developmental properties might be achieved through epigenetic mechanisms. Here we show that modification of histone H3, through the methylation of specific arginine residues, is correlated with cell fate and potency. Levels of H3 methylation at specific arginine residues are maximal in four-cell blastomeres that will contribute to the inner cell mass (ICM) and polar trophectoderm and undertake full development when combined together in chimaeras. Arginine methylation of H3 is minimal in cells whose progeny contributes more to the mural trophectoderm and that show compromised development when combined in chimaeras. This suggests that higher levels of H3 arginine methylation predispose blastomeres to contribute to the pluripotent cells of the ICM. We confirm this prediction by overexpressing the H3-specific arginine methyltransferase CARM1 in individual blastomeres and show that this directs their progeny to the ICM and results in a dramatic upregulation of Nanog and Sox2. Thus, our results identify specific histone modifications as the earliest known epigenetic marker contributing to development of ICM and show that manipulation of epigenetic information influences cell fate determination.

Animals↗

Inhibition of histone deacetylation enhances endotoxin-stimulated transcription but does not reverse endotoxin tolerance.

Covalent modification of histones and the subsequent remodeling of chromatin have emerged as important mechanisms in regulating gene expression. In particular, recent identification of the enzyme families responsible for the steady-state balance of histone acetylation has served to redefine our understanding of these modifications as fundamental biochemical processes regulating transcription. Current evidence suggests that histone acetylation correlates positively with gene activation, while histone deacetylation acts to repress transcription. In this study, we examined the role of histone modification in the inflammatory response to endotoxin. We focused on the endotoxin-stimulated expression of the interleukin-1beta promoter and tested the hypotheses that persistent histone deacetylation was responsible for the decreased expression of this promoter observed after prolonged exposure to endotoxin, a manifestation of a phenomenon known as endotoxin tolerance. We found that histone deacetylase inhibitors enhanced endotoxin-stimulated transcription; however, deacetylation inhibitors could neither block the development of tolerance nor restore endotoxin sensitivity in a tolerant cell. Deacetylase inhibitors could not restore LPS-mediated transcription in tolerant cells. These results show that histone acetylation/deacetylation regulates, at least in part, the endotoxin-induced expression of inflammatory genes and that repressed transcription observed in endotoxin tolerance is not caused by enhanced activity of histone deacetylases.

Blotting, Northern↗

Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing.

Covalent modification of histones is important in regulating chromatin dynamics and transcription. One example of such modification is ubiquitination, which mainly occurs on histones H2A and H2B. Although recent studies have uncovered the enzymes involved in histone H2B ubiquitination and a 'cross-talk' between H2B ubiquitination and histone methylation, the responsible enzymes and the functions of H2A ubiquitination are unknown. Here we report the purification and functional characterization of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that is specific for histone H2A. The complex, termed hPRC1L (human Polycomb repressive complex 1-like), is composed of several Polycomb-group proteins including Ring1, Ring2, Bmi1 and HPH2. hPRC1L monoubiquitinates nucleosomal histone H2A at lysine 119. Reducing the expression of Ring2 results in a dramatic decrease in the level of ubiquitinated H2A in HeLa cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated colocalization of dRing with ubiquitinated H2A at the PRE and promoter regions of the Drosophila Ubx gene in wing imaginal discs. Removal of dRing in SL2 tissue culture cells by RNA interference resulted in loss of H2A ubiquitination concomitant with derepression of Ubx. Thus, our studies identify the H2A ubiquitin ligase, and link H2A ubiquitination to Polycomb silencing.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The indexing potential of histone lysine methylation.

Diverse post-translational modifications of histone N-termini represent an important epigenetic mechanism for the organization of chromatin structure and the regulation of gene activity. Within the last three years, great progress has been made in understanding the functional implications of histone methylation, in particular through the characterization of histone methyltransferases (HMTases) that direct the site-specific methylation of lysine positions in the histone H3 N-terminus. Histone lysine methylation has been linked with pericentric heterochromatin formation, X-inactivation, Polycomb group (Pc-G)-dependent gene repression and epigenetic control of transcription units at euchromatic positions. Together, these regulatory roles have strongly established histone lysine methylation as a central epigenetic modification for the organization of eukaryotic chromatin. However, they also create a paradox: if histone lysine methylation is present at so many chromatin regions, how can it impart epigenetic information? We provide evidence that differences in distinct methylation states (mono- vs. di- vs. trimethylation) and selective combinations of individually methylated lysine positions can indeed index chromatin regions, resulting in epigenetic landmarks for the partitioning of eukaryotic chromatin.

Animals↗

Topoisomerase inhibitor induced dephosphorylation of H1 and H3 histones as a consequence of cell cycle arrest.

Posttranslational modifications of histones have an integral function in the structural and functional organization of chromatin. Several changes in the modification state of histones could be observed after induction of apoptosis with topoisomerase inhibitors and other inducers. Most of these studies include the analysis of the state of phosphorylation of histones, and the results are to some extent controversial, depending on cell lines and agents used. In the present study we compared the kinetics of the dephosphorylation of H1 and H3 histones with apoptosis markers after treatment of leukemic cell lines with topoisomerase inhibitors. In parallel, we determined cell cycle parameters in detail. Dephosphorylation of both histone classes started within 1 h of induction, and no direct correlation with timing and intensity of the investigated apoptotic features could be observed. In contrast, we show that the effect of topoisomerase inhibitors on the state of H1 and H3 phosphorylation is not directly related to apoptosis, but reflects the changes in the cell cycle distribution of cells treated with these inducers.

Cell Cycle↗

The many faces of histone lysine methylation.

Diverse post-translational modifications of histone amino termini represent an important epigenetic mechanism for the organisation of chromatin structure and the regulation of gene activity. Within the past two years, great progress has been made in understanding the functional implications of histone methylation; in particular through the characterisation of histone methyltransferases that direct the site-specific methylation of, for example, lysine 9 and lysine 4 positions in the histone H3 amino terminus. All known histone methyltransferases of this type contain the evolutionarily conserved SET domain and appear to be able to stimulate either gene repression or gene activation. Methylation of H3 Lys9 and Lys4 has been visualised in native chromatin, indicating opposite roles in structuring repressive or accessible chromatin domains. For example, at the mating-type loci in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, at pericentric heterochromatin and at the inactive X chromosome in mammals, striking differences between these distinct marks have been observed. H3 Lys9 methylation is also important to direct additional epigenetic signals such as DNA methylation--for example, in Neurospora crassa and in Arabidopsis thaliana. Together, the available data strongly establish histone lysine methylation as a central modification for the epigenetic organisation of eukaryotic genomes.

Animals↗

Histone H4 hyperacetylation precludes histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation.

Posttranslational modification of histones is a common means of regulating chromatin structure and thus diverse nuclear processes. Using a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation method in combination with mass spectrometric analysis, the present study investigated the alterations in histone H4 methylation/acetylation status and the interplay between H4 methylation and acetylation during in vitro differentiation of mouse erythroleukemia cells and how these modifications affect the chromatin structure. Independently of the type of inducer used (dimethyl sulfoxide, hexamethylenebisacetamide, butyrate, and trichostatin A), we observed a strong increase in non- and monoacetylated H4 lysine 20 (H4-Lys(20)) trimethylation. An increase in H4-Lys(20) trimethylation, however, to a clearly lesser extent, was also found when cells accumulated in the stationary phase. Since we show that trimethylated H4-Lys(20) is localized to heterochromatin, the increase in H4-Lys(20) trimethylation observed indicates an accumulation of chromatin-dense and transcriptionally silent regions during differentiation and during the accumulation of control cells in the stationary phase, respectively. When using the deacetylase inhibitors butyrate or trichostatin A, we found that H4 hyperacetylation prevents H4-Lys(20) trimethylation, but not mono- or dimethylation, and that the nonacetylated unmethylated H4-Lys(20) is therefore the most suitable substrate for H4-Lys(20) trimethylase. Summarizing, histone H4-Lys(20) hypotrimethylation correlates with H4 hyperacetylation and H4-Lys(20) hypertrimethylation correlates with H4 hypoacetylation. The results provide a model for how transcriptionally active euchromatin might be converted to the compacted, transcriptionally silent heterochromatin.

Acetamides↗

Tails and cuts: the role of histone post-translational modifications in the formation of programmed double-strand breaks.

In eukaryotic organisms, various DNA recombination mechanisms have been described that are an integral part of nuclear differentiation processes. In several places, the recombination is initiated by one or more double-strand breaks that result from the action of specific endonucleolytic activities. The importance of chromatin in controlling susceptibility of DNA to various DNA transactions has been recognized for long. Recent literature links post-transcriptional modifications of the amino-terminal part of histones (the tails) to the formation of developmentally regulated DNA double-strand break (the cuts). In this review, I compare the existing data in three different DNA rearrangement-based processes, i.e., genetic recombination associated to meiosis, lymphoid-specific V(D)J recombination and excision of DNA fragments in the nucleus of ciliates. Inspired by some of the concepts established in the field of transcription, models are proposed for molecular mechanisms that sustain the epigenetic control of programmed double-strand break formation.

Animals↗

Environmental epigenetics: Exploring phenotypic plasticity and transgenerational adaptation in fish.

Epigenetics plays a vital role in the interaction between living organisms and their environment by regulating biological functions and phenotypic plasticity. Considering that most aquaculture activities take place in open or natural habitats that are vulnerable to environmental changes. Promising findings from recent research conducted on various aquaculture species have provided preliminary evidence suggesting a link between epigenetic mechanisms and economically valuable characteristics. Environmental stressors, including climate changes (thermal stress, hypoxia, and water salinity), anthropogenic impacts such as (pesticides, crude oil pollution, nutritional impacts, and heavy metal) and abiotic factors (infectious diseases), can directly trigger epigenetic modifications in fish. While experiments have confirmed that many epigenetic alterations caused by environmental factors have plastic responses, some can be permanently integrated into the genome through genetic integration and promoting rapid transgenerational adaptation in fish. These environmental factors might cause irregular DNA methylation patterns in genes related to many biological events leading to organs dysfunction by inducing alterations in genes related to oxidative stress or apoptosis. Moreover, these environmental issues alter DNA/histone methylation leading to decreased reproductive competence. This review emphasizes the importance of understanding the effects of environmentally relevant issues on the epigenetic regulation of phenotypic variations in fish. The goal is to expand our knowledge of how epigenetics can either facilitate or hinder species' adaptation to these adverse conditions. Furthermore, this review outlines the areas that warrant further investigation in understanding epigenetic reactions to various environmental issues.

Animals↗

Combinatorial epigenetics, "junk DNA", and the evolution of complex organisms.

At certain evolutionary junctures, two or more mutations participating in the build-up of a new complex function may be required to become available simultaneously in the same individuals. How could this happen in higher organisms whose populations are small compared to those of microbes, and in which chances of combined nearly simultaneous highly specific favorable mutations are correspondingly low? The question can in principle be answered for regulatory evolution, one of the basic processes of evolutionary change. A combined resetting of transcription rates in several genes could occur in the same individual. It is proposed that, in eukaryotes, changes in epigenetic trends and epigenetically transforming encounters between alternative chromatin structures could arise frequently enough so as to render probable particular conjunctions of changed transcription rates. Such conjunctions could involve mutational changes with low specificity requirements in gene-associated regions of non-protein-coding sequences. The effects of such mutations, notably when they determine the use of histone variants and covalent modifications of histones, can be among those that migrate along chromatin. Changes in chromatin structure are often cellularly inheritable over at least a limited number of generations of cells, and of individuals when the germ line is involved. SINEs and LINEs, which have been considered "junk DNA", are among the repeat sequences that would appear liable to have teleregulatory effects on the function of a nearby promoter, through changes in their numbers and distribution. There may also be present preexisting unstably inheritable epigenetic trends leading to cellular variegation, trends endemic in a cell population based on DNA sequences previously established in the neighborhood. Either way, epigenetically conditioned teleregulatory trends may display only limited penetrance. The imposition at a distance of new chromatin structures with regulatory impact can occur in cis as well as in trans, and is examined as intrachromosomally spreading teleregulation and interchromosomal "gene kissing". The chances for two or more particular epigenetically determined regulatory trends to occur together in a cell are increased thanks to the proposed low specificity requirements for most of the pertinent sequence changes in intergenic and intronic DNA or in the distribution of middle repetitive sequences that have teleregulatory impact. Inheritable epigenetic changes ("epimutations") with effects at a distance would then perdure over the number of generations required for "assimilation" of the several regulatory novelties through the occurrence and selection, gene by gene, of specific classical mutations. These mutations would have effects similar to the epigenetic effects, yet would provide stability and penetrance. The described epigenetic/genetic partnership may well at times have opened the way toward certain complex new functions. Thus, the presence of "junk DNA", through co-determining the (higher or lower) order and the variants of chromatin structure with regulatory effects at a distance, might make an important contribution to the evolution of complex organisms.

Animals↗

[Histone-deacetylases inhibitors: from TSA to SAHA].

Histone-deacetylase inhibitors (HDCACi) represent a new class of antitumor agents currently in clinical development. They target a family of enzymes which catalyse histone acetylation modifications, in particular for histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. These proteins stabilize the nucleosome core, fundamental unity of chromatin which represents the first level of DNA nuclear compaction. The balance of histone acetylation is maintained by histone-acetyltransferases (HAT) and histone-deacetylases (HDAC) which play an important role in gene transcription. Alterations of HDACs were identified in tumor cells and contribute to the massive perturbations of gene expression in numerous tumors. HDAC inhibition leads to differentiation, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in tumor cells. HDACi efficiently prevent tumor growth in a variety of in vivo preclinical models. Several structurally distinct classes of HDACi have entered in clinical trials and a significant antitumor activity was reported in several cases. However, a better understanding of the biological effects of this class of enzymes is mandatory for the successful development of these new antitumoral agents. In this review, are exposed the main drug candidates in clinical development. In the near future, it will be interesting to define direct relationships between specific inhibition of one or several HDAC and the subsequent HDAC-dependent antitumor effects to define a new generation of specific histone-deacetylase inhibitors.

Acetylation↗

Simple histone acetylation plays a complex role in the regulation of gene expression.

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin by histone proteins, which assemble the DNA into an organized, higher-order structure. The precise organization of chromatin is essential for faithful execution of DNA-mediated reactions such as transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair and DNA recombination. The organization of chromatin is considered to be regulated by a variety of post-translational modifications of histones, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and poly-ADP-ribosylation. The relationship between histone acetylation and gene expression was first observed in 1964. Since then, a great deal of evidence has accumulated showing that not only transcription but other DNA-mediated reactions also are regulated by histone acetylation. With regard to the putative mechanism(s) by which histone acetylation regulates the flow of genetic information, site-specific modification and recognition of acetylated histone/DNA complexes have been postulated. Elucidation of the downstream effects of histone modification, as well as the identification, isolation and characterization of the relevant factors involved, have aided in our understanding of the mechanisms of regulation of DNA activity by histones. Currently, state-of-the-art technologies that enable genome-wide analysis are allowing insight into a critical and interesting question in eukaryotic transcription: are the principles that govern transcription of individual gene loci applicable to the genome as a whole? Here, we review the recent progress on histone modifications, with an emphasis on the role of histone acetylation in gene expression.

Acetylation↗

Structure of a covalently cross-linked form of core histones present in the starfish sperm.

The post-translational modification of core histones plays an essential role in chromatin remodeling processes. We recently reported the occurrence of a novel histone modification, involving a epsilon-(gamma-glutamyl)lysine cross-link between a glutamine residue of histone H2B and a lysine residue of histone H4 in the testis of the starfish, Asterina pectinifera[Shimizu, T., Hozumi, K., Horiike, S., Nunomura, K., Ikegami, S., Takao, T., and Shimonishi, Y. (1996) Nature 380, 32]. In order to determine the complete structure of the modified histone heterodimer, p28 from both testis and sperm was purified. p28 was digested with Achromobacter lyticus protease I or Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease to give proteolytic fragments that were separated by HPLC. Amino acid analysis, sequencing, and mass spectrometric analysis of the fragments showed that the amino acid sequences of these fragments are identical to those of both histones H2B and H4, except for two NH2-terminal peptides obtained by digestion with A. lyticus protease I. One of the peptides, K8, was identical to that reported previously, and the other was a here-to-fore unidentified peptide, which was designated K10. Amino acid and positive-ion FAB-MS/MS analyses of K10 showed that it to be a fragment, derived from Gly8-Lys10 of histone H2B and Gly9-Lys16 of histone H4. The yields of K8 and K10 were calculated to be 47 and 42%, respectively, expressed as the percent of the total amount of p28 used in the experiment. Based on these data, the structure of p28 was determined to be a heterodimer, composed of histones H2B and H4, formed through a transglutaminase-catalyzed acyl transfer reaction between Gln9 of histone H2B and Lys5 or Lys12 of histone H4.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Translating the histone code into leukemia.

The "histone code" is comprised of the covalent modifications of histone tails that function to regulate gene transcription. The post-translational modifications that occur in histones within the regulatory regions of genes include acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, and ADP-ribosylation. These modifications serve to alter chromatin structure and accessibility, and to act as docking sites for transcription factors or other histone modifying enzymes. Several of the factors that are disrupted by chromosomal translocations associated with hematological malignancies can alter the histone code in a gene-specific manner. Here, we discuss how the histone code may be disrupted by chromosomal translocations, either directly by altering the activity of histone modifying enzymes, or indirectly by recruitment of this type of enzyme by oncogenic transcription factors. These alterations in the histone code may alter gene expression pattern to set the stage for leukemogenesis.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Functional domains of histone deacetylase-3.

Post-translational modifications of histones, in general, and acetylation/deacetylation, in particular, can dramatically alter gene expression in eukaryotic cells. In humans, four highly homologous class I HDAC enzymes (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8) have been identified to date. Although HDAC3 shares some structural and functional similarities with other class I HDACs, it exists in multisubunit complexes separate and different from other known HDAC complexes, implying that individual HDACs might function in a distinct manner. In this current study, to understand further the cellular function of HDAC3 and to uncover possible unique roles this protein may have in gene regulation, we performed a detailed analysis of HDAC3 using deletion mutations. Surprisingly, we found that the non-conserved C-terminal region of HDAC3 is required for both deacetylase and transcriptional repression activity. In addition, we discovered that the central portion of the HDAC3 protein possesses a nuclear export signal, whereas the C-terminal part of HDAC3 contributes to the protein's localization in the nucleus. Finally, we found that HDAC3 forms oligomers in vitro and in vivo and that the N-terminal portion of HDAC3 is necessary for this property. These data indicate that HDAC3 comprises separate, non-overlapping domains that contribute to the unique properties and function of this protein.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

A conserved motif common to the histone acetyltransferase Esa1 and the histone deacetylase Rpd3.

Post-translational modification of histones enables dynamic regulation of chromatin structure in eukaryotes. Histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) modify the N-terminal tails of histones by adding or removing acetyl groups to specific lysine residues. A particular pair of HAT (Esa1) and HDAC (Rpd3) is proposed to modify the same lysine residue in vitro and in vivo. Thus, HAT and HDAC might have similar structural and functional motifs. Here we show that HAT (Esa1 family) and HDAC (Rpd3 family) have similar amino acid stretches in the primary structures through evolution. We refer to this region as the "ER (Esa1-Rpd3) motif." In the tertiary structure of Esa1, the ER motif is located near the active center. In Rpd3, for which the tertiary structure remains unclear, we demonstrate that the ER motif contains the same secondary structure as found in Esa1 by circular dichroism analysis. We did alanine-scanning mutagenesis and found that the ER motif regions of Esa1 or Rpd3 are required for HAT activity of Esa1 or HDAC activity of Rpd3, respectively. Our discovery of the ER motif present in the pair of enzymes (HAT and HDAC) indicates that HAT and HDAC have common structural bases, although they catalyze the reaction with opposite functions.

Acetyltransferases↗

Transcription-induced chromatin remodeling at the c-myc gene involves the local exchange of histone H2A.Z.

The post-translational modification of histones and the incorporation of core histone variants play key roles in governing gene expression. Many eukaryotic genes regulate their expression by limiting the escape of RNA polymerase from promoter-proximal pause sites. Here we report that elongating RNA polymerase II complexes encounter distinct chromatin landscapes that are marked by methylation of lysine residues Lys(4), Lys(79), and Lys(36) of histone H3. However, neither histone methylation nor acetylation directly regulates the release of elongation complexes stalled at promoter-proximal pause sites of the c-myc gene. In contrast, transcriptional activation is associated with local displacement of the histone variant H2A.Z within the transcribed region and incorporation of the major histone variant H2A. This result indicates that transcribing RNA polymerase II remodels chromatin in part through coincident displacement of H2A.Z-H2B dimers and incorporation of H2A-H2B dimers. In combination, these results suggest a new model in which the incorporation of H2A.Z into nucleosomes down-regulates transcription; at the same time it may act as a cellular memory for transcriptionally poised gene domains.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗