Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HISTAMINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources

Inhibition by dexamethasone of histamine production in allergic inflammation in rats.

In an allergic inflammation model of air pouch type in rats, histamine level in the pouch fluid and histidine decarboxylase activity of pouch wall tissues in the postanaphylaxis phase were increased. Although treatment with dexamethasone failed to inhibit histamine release from mast cells in the anaphylaxis phase, histamine production in the postanaphylaxis phase was inhibited dose dependently. Histamine production-increasing activity in the pouch fluid collected 8 h after the Ag challenge, which was estimated by an activity to stimulate histamine production by bone marrow cells, was decreased by the administration of dexamethasone at the time of the Ag challenge. The addition of steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, dexamethasone, prednisolone, or hydrocortisone, into the incubation medium inhibited the pouch fluid-induced histamine production by bone marrow cells. Hydrocortisone mesylate antagonized the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on histamine production by bone marrow cells. However, hydrocortisone mesylate failed to recover the decrease in histamine production-increasing activity of the pouch fluid collected from dexamethasone-treated rats. In addition, the dialyzed sample of pouch fluid obtained from dexamethasone-treated nonsensitized rats did not reduce the stimulated histamine production by the pouch fluid sample obtained from the sensitized rats. However, increase in histamine production of bone marrow cells stimulated by the pouch fluid was not inhibited by cyclosporin A that inhibited histamine production induced by Con A. This observation indicates that the pouch fluid has no effect to induce production of the histamine production-increasing factor by bone marrow cells. Consequently, it is suggested that dexamethasone inhibits not only the production of histamine production-increasing factor but also the response of histamine-producing cells to this factor.

Animals↗

Inhibition of IgE and compound 48/80-induced histamine release by lectins.

Lectins from Ricinus communis and Glycine max, as well as wheat germ agglutinin and concanavalin A, caused a dose-dependent release of histamine from mast cells present in the mixed peritoneal cells from the rat. In addition, histamine release in an IgE-mediated and a compound 48/80-mediated reaction was inhibited in cells which had been pretreated with these lectins. With concanavalin A and the R. communis lectin both effect were prevented by the addition of the appropriate monosaccharides to the incubations. However, the lectin-induced histamine release and the lectin-induced inhibition of subsequent IgE-mediated histamine release could be dissociated: thus L-rhamnose, a hexose not ordinarily found on mammalian cell membranes, a specifically inhibited histamine release which was caused by the lectin from R. communis without affecting the inhibition of IgE-mediated histamine release. Conversely, D-fucose, which also is not a constituent of cell membrane glycolipids or glycoproteins prevented the inhibition of IgE-mediated histamine release by this lectin without affecting the lectin-induced histamine release. Furthermore, the nominally galactose-specific lectins from Sophora japonica and Ulex europeus inhibited IgE-mediated histamine release while causing little if any histamine release themselves. High concentrations of the lectin from Lotus tetragonolobus failed to cause histamine release or to affect the IgE-mediated histamine release reaction. Based on the known structural specificity of these lectins and the amounts of the lectins which were required to demonstrate an effect, it was concluded that D-galactose, alpha-linked, intrachain D-glucose (or mannose), and N-acetylglucosamine residues but probably not N-acetyl-galactosamine or L-fucose residues in the glycolipids or glycoproteins of the mast cell membrane can play a role in the initiation of histamine release and in the desensitization of the cells to subsequent histamine release-inducing stimuli.

Animals↗

Microvascular actions of histamine: synergism with leukotriene B4 and role in allergic leucocyte recruitment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that antihistamines provide little or no protection against the recruitment of leucocytes in allergic inflammation. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to examine if threshold doses of histamine can potentiate chemoattractant-induced leukocyte adhesion and if complete inhibition of histamine-induced microvascular effects is necessary to reduce allergic leucocyte recruitment. METHODS: The role of histamine in allergic leucocyte recruitment was examined by use of intravital microscopy of the hamster cheek pouch microcirculation. RESULTS: We found that topical administration of histamine caused a concentration-dependent increase in microvascular permeability in the cheek pouch; i.e. 0.3 microM histamine caused no detectable plasma leakage, while 1 microM and 10 microM histamine resulted in 29 +/- 9.3 and 356 +/- 47 leakage sites/cm2 cheek pouch area, respectively. The percentage of postcapillary venules with more than five adherent leucocytes (an index of early leucocyte recruitment) was 1.1 +/- 0.51% in the control situation, and did not increase significantly after stimulation with histamine alone (0.3-10 microM) or with 1 nM leukotriene B4 (LTB4). On the other hand, coapplication of 10 microM histamine and 1 nM LTB4 increased leucocyte adhesion 24-fold. In fact, the 10 times lower dose of histamine (1 microM) together with 1 nM LTB4 increased leucocyte adhesion to a similar extent (20 fold). The increase in vascular permeability evoked by exogenous 10 microM histamine (with or without LTB4), or by histamine released from activated mast cells (antigen challenge), was completely reversed by local pretreatment with the H1-receptor antagonist mepyramine. This mepyramine treatment also abolished the enhanced leucocyte adhesion in response to coapplication of histamine and LTB4. Moreover, mepyramine, which had no effect on leucocyte recruitment evoked by 3 nM LTB4 per se, reduced antigen-induced recruitment of leucocytes to the extravascular tissue by 79.5 +/- 14.8%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that threshold concentrations of histamine can strikingly potentiate chemoattractant-induced leucocyte responses, and that in order to reduce allergic leucocyte recruitment it may be necessary to use antihistamines in doses high enough to abolish the microvascular actions of histamine.

Animals↗

[An attempt to block histamine release from basophils granulocytes with antibodies obtained as a result of long-term immunization].

UNLABELLED: Pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for efficacy of specific immunotherapy still remain to be fully explained. This concerns both desensitization with classic allergens and very rarely used specific immunotherapy with bacteria. Microbes can play important role as hypersensitivity factor in some allergo-inflammatory processes. Bacterial products may act as basophil histamine liberators through immunological (IgE-mediated) and nonimmunological--particular lectin-sugar way. The aim of study was to verify if histamine release triggered by microbes could be modified (blocked) with specific antibacterial antibodies--taking into consideration both of mechanisms of basophil degranulation. The size of immediate (in healthy persons--Tab. 3, 4) and late as well as delayed (in asthmatic patients--Tab. 8) skin reactivity to examined microorganisms and the degree of basophil histamine release induced with these bacteria were compared. Human basophils were isolated from peripheral blood on Ficoll-Hypaque gradient, next challenged with whole, formalin-killed bacteria and with the same bacteria after incubation with specific and nonspecific sera. To differentiate between IgE-dependent and non-immunological mechanisms of histamine release, the IgE molecules were removed from the surface of the basophils by exposure to pH 3.6 (stripping). In each experiment histamine release induced by anti-IgE antibodies was used as control of stripping (Tab. 5, 9). Levels of histamine from the basophils (without and after stripping) incubated with non-coated and specific antibodies coated bacteria were compared. The results were expressed as a percentage of total histamine content in the sample. Histamine release was assayed spectrofluorometrically by using Shore method in Norn modification. The main investigations concerned the basophils from 12 healthy, non-atopic individuals, who had positive immediate skin reactions with at least 1 from 3 microbial strains: Staphylococcus aureus 9615 (unencapsulated), Staphylococcus aureus Smith (encapsulated) and Escherichia coli. Sera containing specific antibodies for these microorganisms were obtained from immunized rabbits. As negative control served sera collected from animals after immunization. Additionally the basophils of 6 asthmatic (intrinsic asthma) patients treated with autovaccines were examined. All patients demonstrated positive late and delayed skin reactions, 3 of them also immediate, to autologous Neisseria and Moraxella species cultured from upper respiratory tract. The bacteria were used as a component of autovaccine and as a basophils stimulating factor in histamine assay. Microbes were incubated with patients own sera before (unspecific serum) and after treatment (source of "specific" antibodies). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Bacteria induced basophil histamine release through two ways: immunological (IgE-mediated) and non-immunological (sugar-lectin interactions). 2. Non-immunological interactions played the main role in basophil histamine release induced by bacteria--both in normal individuals and asthmatic patients. 3. Sera of immunized with bacteria animals partially reduced basophil histamine release induced by homologous strains (Tab. 7). 4. An incubation of autologous bacterial strains with asthmatic patients's sera collected after autovaccines treatment has no influence on basophil histamine release induced by these microbes (Tab. 9). 5. There was no correlation between the skin reactivity to bacteria (both in healthy persons and in asthmatic patients) and the intensity of basophil histamine release induced by microbes.

Adult↗

Histamine receptor type coupled to nitric oxide-induced relaxation of guinea-pig nasal mucosa.

1 The aim of this study was to characterize the histamine receptor type mediating relaxation of the vascular bed of the nasal mucosa from the guinea-pig, and to determine the role of cyclo-oxygenase products and nitric oxide in this relaxant response to histamine. These studies were performed in isolated nasal mucosae examined in vitro to obtain potencies of histamine receptor-type selective agonists in causing vasorelaxation and to determine affinities of histamine receptor antagonists for inhibiting histamine-induced relaxation. 2 After contraction of nasal mucosae with noradrenaline, histamine caused a maximal relaxation response that was 75 +/- 6% of the contraction caused by noradrenaline with a mean EC50 value of 4.3 +/- 0.5 microM. Neither dimaprit (H2-receptor selective) nor R-alpha-methylhistamine (H3-receptor selective) caused significant relaxation of nasal mucosae. In contrast, betahistine (H1-receptor selective) caused an 81 +/- 7% relaxation of noradrenaline-induced tone with an EC50 value of 15 +/- 1 microM. 3 pA2 experiments were performed to obtain KB values of chlorpheniramine (H1-receptor selective) and diphenhydramine (H1-receptor selective) for blocking histamine-stimulated relaxation of nasal mucosae. KB values for chlorpheniramine (0.87 nM) and diphenhydramine (7.4 nM) were consistent with their interaction at the H1-receptor type. Additionally, neither 10 microM cimetidine (H2-receptor selective) nor 1 microM thioperamide (H3-receptor selective) had any effect on the relaxation curve for histamine. 4 In the presence of 10 microM indomethacin (cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor), histamine caused a maximal relaxation response of 73 +/- 5% of the noradrenaline-induced tone with an EC50 value of 2.9 +/- 0.2 microM, which was not different from control values (EC50 = 5.0 +/- 0.4 microM; maximal relaxation = 71 +/- 6%). In contrast, 200 microM NG-nitro-L-arginine (nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) completely inhibited histamine-induced relaxation of nasal mucosae. 5 In conclusion, data from the present study suggest only the H1-receptor type mediates relaxation of nasal mucosal blood vessels to histamine, and histamine-induced relaxation of nasal mucosae is entirely dependent on nitric oxide production.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Histamine inhibits the production of interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa in human squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma.

Interferon-induced protein of (IP-10) inhibits tumor progression. Tumor cells can produce interferon-induced protein of IP-10 in response to interferon-g. Histamine in the vicinity of tumor cells may sustain the tumor progression. We examined the in vitro effects of histamine on interferon-induced protein of IP-10 production in human squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. Histamine suppressed interferon-g-mediated interferon-induced protein of IP-10 secretion and mRNA expression in SV40-transformed keratinocytes, SCC15, SCC4, and melanoma WM115, WM266-4, and C32. Histamine suppressed interferon-g-induced interferon-mediated protein of IP-10 promoter activation in these cells, and the interferon-stimulated response element on the promoter was responsible for the suppression. Histamine suppressed interferon-g-mediated transcription through the interferon-stimulated response element and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha binding to the interferon-stimulated response element. Histamine suppressed interferon-g-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha, Janus tyrosine kinase 1, and Janus tyrosine kinase 2. Histamine-mediated suppression on the interferon-g-induced interferon-mediated protein of IP-10 synthesis was counteracted by the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine, adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22536, and protein kinase A inhibitor H-89, but were not affected by H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine. Cimetidine, SQ22536, and H-89 also counteracted histamine-mediated suppression on the interferon-g-induced transcription through the interferon-stimulated response element, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha binding to the interferon-stimulated response element, and tyrosine phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha, Janus tyrosine kinase 1, and Janus tyrosine kinase 2. Histamine increased intracellular 3',5'-adenosine cyclic monophosphate level and protein kinase A activity in squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma, and the effects of histamine were blocked by cimetidine. These results suggest that histamine may interact with H2 receptor on squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma and generate 3',5'-adenosine cyclic monophosphate, which may activate protein kinase A. The cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A signaling pathway induced by histamine may inhibit interferon-g-induced signal transducer and activator of transcription 1alpha activation and suppress interferon-induced protein of IP-10 synthesis.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

H1-receptor-mediated excitation and facilitation of the heat response by histamine in canine visceral polymodal receptors studied in vitro.

1. We examined excitation and the facilitatory effect on the heat responses induced by histamine in visceral polymodal receptors with the use of the canine testis-spermatic nerve preparation in vitro. 2. The proportion of units that showed excitation (> 10 impulses 1 min after application of histamine was initiated) increased roughly with higher concentrations of histamine: 7% at 1 microM, 26% at 10 microM, 79% at 100 microM, and 61% at 1,000 microM. The discharge rate also increased with the concentration. 3. Histamine (100 and 1,000 microM) responses > 0.5 imp/s were observed only in units with conduction velocities (CVs) of < or = 10 m/s, but not in those with CVs faster than 10 m/s. On average, histamine-induced discharges were significantly greater in units with CVs of < or = 10 m/s at all concentrations > or = 10 microM. Thus units studied in this experiment were empirically divided into slow-CV (< or = m/s) and fast-CV (> 10 m/s) groups. 4. Histamine significantly facilitated the heat responses of the slow-CV group from 10 microM, and also facilitated the fast-CV group from 100 microM. This sensitizing effect was observed irrespective of the precedent histamine-induced excitation. The magnitude of sensitization tended to increase with an increase in histamine concentration. 5. For studying the histamine receptor subtype involved in excitation and facilitation, we used D-chlorpheniramine maleate (5 microM) (an H1 receptor antagonist), famotidine (20 microM) (an H2 receptor antagonist), and thioperamide maleate (20 microM) (an H3 receptor antagonist). The magnitude of histamine-induced excitation of the slow-CV group was significantly suppressed by the H1 receptor antagonist but not by other antagonists. 6. The facilitatory effect of histamine on the heat response was also suppressed by the H1 receptor antagonist in both slow- and fast-CV groups. 7. These results strongly suggested that both excitation and facilitation of the heat response induced by histamine are mediated through the H1 receptor.

Animals↗

Direct and indirect effects of histamine on the smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig main pulmonary artery.

Electrophysiological studies of the effects of histamine on the smooth muscles in the guinea-pig main pulmonary artery revealed that this amine produced muscle contraction with an associated depolarization of the membrane. Application of cimetidine potentiated and that of mepyramine suppressed these histamine-induced responses. In the presence of mepyramine, histamine produced membrane hyperpolarization. Contractions produced by perivascular nerve stimulation were potentiated by histamine, and additional application of cimetidine further potentiated while addition of mepyramine suppressed the histamine-induced enhancement. The amplitude of excitatory junction potentials was increased by application of histamine plus cimetidine and was decreased by histamine plus mepyramine. Excitatory effects of histamine on the electrical and mechanical responses were reduced by application of tetrodotoxin, prazosin, phentolamine or guanethidine. In the presence of these drugs, histamine produced depolarization with an associated increase in membrane resistance and, in high concentrations, produced spike potentials. Electrical and mechanical responses of the smooth muscles to exogenously applied noradrenaline were potentiated by pretreatment with histamine and cimetidine, and were suppressed by histamine and mepyramine. These observations indicate that the guinea-pig main pulmonary artery possesses two types of histamine receptor, H1- and H2-receptors, in the smooth muscles and in the perivascular adrenergic nerves. Stimulation of H1 or H2-receptor produces excitatory or inhibitory effects, respectively, on the smooth muscles and on the adrenergic nerves. Contraction of the muscle tissues produced by histamine is brought about by a direct effect on the smooth muscles and by increased release of transmitters, as a result of excitation of perivascular nerves.

Action Potentials↗

Characterization of histamine receptors modulating inotropic and biochemical activities in rabbit left atria.

The experiments were performed to identify histamine H1- and H2-receptors in rabbit left atrium and to characterize the pharmacological properties mediated by the respective subtypes of histamine receptors. High-affinity saturable binding to the left atrial membranes was obtained for [3H]mepyramine, yielding a maximum binding capacity (Bmax) of 96 fmol/mg of protein and an equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of 3.8 nM and also for [3H]tiotidine, yielding a Bmax of 126 fmol/mg of protein and a KD of 14.7 nM. In isolated left atrium, histamine produced a concentration-dependent positive inotropic effect, an effect which was competitively antagonized by cimetidine but not altered by chlorpheniramine. Schild analysis showed that the pA2 value for cimetidine was 6.55 and the slope was not significantly different from unity. An excellent correlation was found between the increase in force of contraction and cyclic AMP in the presence of histamine, suggesting that the positive inotropic effect of histamine in rabbit left atrium is dependent on an increased level of intracellular cyclic AMP through stimulation of histamine H2-receptors. Histamine also produced concentration-dependent stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis as measured by [3H]inositol monophosphate accumulation. The phosphoinositide response to histamine was blocked by chlorpheniramine and mepyramine but not by cimetidine. The data indicate that histamine H1-receptors, in addition to histamine H2-receptors, are present in the rabbit left atrium. Although this tissue lacks an inotropic response to histamine H1-receptor stimulation, the histamine H1-receptors interact with histamine to mediate the stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis.

Animals↗

Histamine H1 and H3 vasodilator mechanisms in the guinea pig ileum.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Histamine dilates gastrointestinal blood vessels. Whether this is caused by direct activation of vascular histamine receptors or by activation of enteric neurons is not known. The aim of this study was to determine which of these pathways is activated by histamine and to examine the cellular mechanisms involved. METHODS: The effects of histamine were studied in in vitro submucosal preparations from the guinea pig ileum using videomicroscopy to monitor changes in submucosal arteriolar diameter. RESULTS: Histamine caused a tetrodotoxin-insensitive dose-dependent dilation (median effective concentration [EC50], 1 mumol/L), showing direct activation of vascular histamine receptors. The H1 antagonist pyrilamine, but not the H2 blocker ranitidine, competitively inhibited the histamine dilatation. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) inhibited histamine vasodilations by 66%. Indomethacin alone did not alter histamine vasodilations but, when combined with L-NMMA, caused a significantly greater inhibition of the histamine response compared with L-NMMA alone. L-Arginine prevented the actions of L-NMMA. In the presence of both H1 and H2 antagonists, periarteriolar stimulation of sympathetic nerves evoked a tetrodotoxin-sensitive vasoconstriction, which was inhibited by histamine (EC50, 0.8 mumol/L). This histamine action was blocked by the H3 antagonist thioperamide. CONCLUSIONS: Histamine can produce vasodilation of submucosal arterioles by two distinct mechanisms: activation of vascular H1 receptors resulting in release of nitric oxide from endothelium and activation of H3 receptors on sympathetic nerve terminals resulting in presynaptic inhibition of vasoconstrictor tone.

Animals↗

Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation mechanisms by histamine in simian but not in canine femoral arterial branches.

1. The vascular response of isolated, perfused canine and simian femoral arteries, which distribute blood to deep skeletal muscles, were investigated. 2. The vascular responses to histamine, 2-pyridylethylamine (2-PEA), dimaprit and alpha-methylhistamine were pharmacologically analyzed in canine and simian vessels, using diphenhydramine (DPH, a histamine H1 receptor antagonist), cimetidine (a histamine H2 antagonist) and saponin which readily removed the endothelium. 3. In canine arteries, alpha-methylhistamine showed no vascular response, but in simian preparations, it caused a slight vasoconstriction. 4. In canine arteries, histamine and 2-PEA consistently induced a vasoconstriction in preconstricted and non-preconstricted preparations. However, in simian arteries histamine usually produced a vasodilatation at small doses (less than 10(-7) mol) and a vasoconstriction at large doses in preconstricted preparations. 5. Vasoconstrictor responses to histamine and 2-PEA were significantly inhibited by DPH in both species. In simian vessels, histamine- and dimaprit-induced vasodilatations were significantly inhibited by cimetidine. 6. After removal of the endothelium by intraluminal treatment with saponin in canine femoral arteries, the vascular responses to histamine, 2-PEA and dimaprit were not significantly affected. On the other hand, in simian femoral arteries, the vasodilatation responses to histamine and 2-PEA were significantly depressed by the removal of endothelium. 7. It is concluded that (1) in both simian and canine femoral arterial branches, there are abundant histamine H1 and H2 receptors (2) in simian but not in canine arteries, there exist histamine H3 receptors, although their role is not clear (3) histamine induces a vasoconstriction mediated via histamine H1 receptors and a vasodilatation via H2 receptors which exist in vascular smooth muscle, and (4) in simian but not in canine arteries, there are endothelium-dependent vasodilatation mechanisms.

Animals↗

Effects of histamine on functional maturation of dendritic cells.

There is increasing evidence that histamine affects dendritic cell (DC) activation, maturation, and preference for Th1/Th2 differentiation. In this paper we report that histamine affects interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-6 production in an immature DC (iDC) line derived from murine spleen. Histamine treatment of iDC significantly increased the IL-12 p40 mRNA and protein levels compared to histamine untreated iDC. In the presence of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha histamine also increased IL-12 p40 and IL-6 production. However, histamine significantly decreased IL-12 p40 production by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated DC in a concentration dependent manner. When expressions of histamine H1 (H1R) and H2 (H2R) receptors in DC were analyzed by RT-PCR, both receptors were down-regulated after LPS or TNF-alpha stimulation compared to unstimulated iDC. Histamine treatment significantly increased the expression of H2R mRNA in iDC and H1R mRNA in LPS-activated DC. However, histamine treatment decreased the expression of both histamine receptors in TNF-alpha-stimulated DC. Similar results were obtained by flow cytometry with FITC-conjugated histamine. These results demonstrate that histamine can regulate the expression of its own receptors and activate iDC, which may influence subsequent functional states of mature DC in a maturation signal-dependent manner. Consequently, histamine may contribute to an immune response outcome.

Animals↗

Suppression of rat stomach histidine decarboxylase activity by histamine: H2-receptor-mediated feed-back.

1. Gastrin activates rat stomach histidine decarboxylase. Exogenous histamine suppressed the basal enzyme activity in unoperated, in nephrectomized, in vagally denervated and in antrectomized rats, and counteracted the pentagastrin-induced enzyme activation in unoperated rats.2. Kinetic analysis of enzyme-catalysed histidine decarboxylation in extracts from untreated vagotomized and from histamine-treated vagotomized rats showed that the histamine-induced suppression of histidine decarboxylase activity probably reflects a reduced enzyme concentration. Moreover, the enzyme half-life in vagotomized rats after treatment with histamine was shorter than the half-life observed after inhibition of enzyme synthesis. These observations suggest that administration of histamine not only inhibits enzyme synthesis but also causes an accelerated rate of elimination of histidine decarboxylase.3. Intravenous infusion of histamine caused marked displacement of the pentagastrin dose-response curve, in a manner suggesting a reduced sensitivity to pentagastrin.4. After H(2)-receptor blockade, but not after H(1)-receptor blockade, histamine was less effective in suppressing the enzyme activity. Furthermore, H(2)-receptor blockade augmented the pentagastrin-induced enzyme activation.5. The results suggest that histamine (via H(2)-receptors) reduces the sensitivity of the histamine-storing cells to gastrin and that H(2)-receptor blockade induces the opposite effects.6. We propose that the histamine-storing cells in the rat stomach are endowed with H(2)-receptors and that exogenous histamine is capable of acting directly on the histamine cells. This may reflect a physiological control mechanism whereby mobilized endogenous histamine modifies its own synthesis and release.

Animals↗

Histamine inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha release by mast cells through H2 and H3 receptors.

Histamine was one of the first inflammatory mediators thought to be important in the pathophysiology of asthma, but it is not now thought to be a mediator with primary importance in airway constriction. However, histamine has several effects that may be relevant. One of these effects, its immunoregulatory role, has been largely ignored in asthma. Thus, because mast cells (MC) are an important source of histamine and cytokines, the modulation by histamine of the release of one cytokine, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), was investigated. Rat peritoneal MC (PMC) were pretreated with different concentrations of histamine (10(-14) to 10(-4) M) for 2 h before being tested for their TNF alpha-dependent cytotoxicity. A concentration-dependent inhibition of cytotoxicity was observed from 21% at 10(-12) M to 38% at 10(-4) M, reaching a plateau at 10(-8) M. At least 1 h pretreatment with histamine or its presence throughout the cytotoxic assay was required for the inhibitory effect of histamine. This inhibition was abrogated by indomethacin or anti-PGE2, suggesting that PGE2 may be an important mediator in the inhibition of TNF alpha by histamine. To investigate the type of histamine receptor implicated in this effect, PMC were treated for 20 min with H1 (clemastine and diphenhydramine), H2 (ranitidine and cimetidine), or H3 (thioperamide) receptor antagonists before the addition of histamine. H2 or H3 antagonists abrogated the inhibitory effect of histamine on PMC TNF alpha-dependent cytotoxicity. Furthermore, blockage of H2 receptors with ranitidine increased the release of TNF alpha from PMC stimulated with antigen, suggesting that histamine released by MC within 10 min of antigen stimulation downregulates the subsequent release of TNF alpha from the same MC population. These results suggest that histamine may act as an autocrine regulator of cytokine release by MC and thus modulate inflammatory responses in allergic asthma.

Animals↗

Histamine-induced adherence and migration of equine eosinophils.

OBJECTIVES: To examine effects of histamine on equine eosinophil adherence in vitro and to determine the histamine receptor subtype(s) and cell surface adhesion molecules that mediate this response. In addition, to determine the receptor subtypes involved in histamine-induced eosinophil migration. ANIMALS: 8 healthy ponies. PROCEDURE: Effects of histamine on equine eosinophil adherence to serum- or fibronectin-coated plastic, and migration in a microchemotaxis assay were examined. In some experiments, eosinophils were pretreated with histamine receptor antagonists or monoclonal antibodies raised against cell adhesion molecules. For comparison, the effect of histamine on equine neutrophil adherence and migration was studied. RESULTS: Histamine induced adherence of equine eosinophils, but not neutrophils, to serum- and fibronectin-coated plastic (P < 0.01). Histamine also caused migration of equine eosinophils, but not neutrophils (P < 0.01). Histamine-induced adherence and migration of equine eosinophils were inhibited by histamine, (H,)-receptor antagonists chlorpheniramine and mepyramine (P < 0.01), but not H2- or H3-receptor antagonists cimetidine and thioperamide. Monoclonal antibodies raised against CD18, but not very late antigen 4, reduced histamine-induced equine eosinophil adherence to serum- and fibronectin-coated plastic (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: When released from mast cells or basophils, histamine could stimulate adherence and migration of equine eosinophils via H, receptor activation and induce adherence of equine eosinophils to opsonized surfaces or dermal connective tissue matrix proteins via CD18 activation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Histamine may have a part in regulating equine eosinophil function during parasitic killing or antigen-induced responses in horses with insect hypersensitivity.

Animals↗

Functional depression of H2 histamine receptors in sheep with experimental allergic asthma.

We tested the hypothesis that airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine in the allergic sheep is related to functional depression of H2 histamine receptors. Thirteen of 32 sheep responded with bronchoconstriction to inhaled Ascaris suum antigen (allergic sheep), and the remainder served as controls (nonallergic sheep). In the allergic sheep, 50 and 100 breaths of 5% histamine solution increased mean pulmonary resistance (RL) to 235% and 438% of baselines, respectively. The corresponding values in nonallergic sheep were 200% and 211%, indicating a greater response to the higher dose of histamine in allergic sheep. Selective H1-receptor stimulation with 50 breaths of histamine (pretreatment with the H2-receptor antagonist metiamide) failed to enhance the effect of histamine in allergic sheep (mean RL increased to 239% of baseline) whereas it enhanced the histamine response in nonallergic sheep (RL increased to 438% of baseline). Selective H2-receptor stimulation (pretreatment with the H1-receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine) caused histamine to decrease RL by 31% in the nonallergic sheep group; it blocked but did not reverse the histamine effect in the allergic sheep. Similar observations were made in a different group of animals when selective H1- or selective H2-receptor stimulation was produced by 100 breaths of histamine. The cutaneous wheal response to intradermal histamine dilutions of 0.0001. 0.001, 0.01, and 1 mg/ml was similar in both groups. In nonallergic sheep, both chlorpheniramine and metiamide blunted the cutaneous wheal response. In allergic animals, only chlorpheniramine blunted the cutaneous wheal response, whereas metiamide was without effect. We conclude that airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine in allergic sheep is related to a functional depression of H2 receptors and that such a defect is observed both in the airways as well as in the skin.

Animals↗

Mechanisms involved in the vasorelaxing influence of histamine on isolated human subcutaneous resistance arteries.

The effects of histamine were analysed on human subcutaneous small arteries. No effect was seen on non-precontracted preparations. After precontraction (norepinephrine 1 microM and K+ 30 mM) histamine potently relaxed the arteries (EC50 = 0.3 microM; max. effect = 95% relaxation). The histamine H1 receptor antagonist, pyrilamine (10 microM), had only a small, non-significant inhibitory influence on histamine-induced relaxation while the histamine H2 receptor antagonist, cimetidine (0.1 mM), had a significant inhibitory influence. Relaxation was completely blocked in the presence of both antagonists. Both 2-pyridylethylamine (histamine H1 receptor agonist) and dimaprit (histamine H2 receptor agonist) elicited relaxation. Removal of endothelium reduced the relaxation effects of histamine and 2-pyridylethylamine, but not of dimaprit. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by nitro-L-arginine significantly inhibited histamine-induced relaxation and even more clearly the cimetidine-resistant component. We conclude that histamine potently relaxes human subcutaneous arterioles, and that most probably both muscular histamine H2 receptors and endothelial histamine H1 receptors, thus activating nitric oxide release, contribute to the relaxation.

Adipose Tissue↗

Histamine receptors on bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Histamine receptors on bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were detected by three different methods: a rosetting technique, binding to histamine-bearing Sepharose beads and immunofluorescence staining. The rosetting technique used histamine-rabbit serum albumin (H-RSA) conjugated to bovine red blood cells to detect histamine receptors and this showed that 10.8% of bovine PBL were positive. A method using H-RSA conjugate coupled Sepharose beads also detected histamine receptor bearing PBL but was not quantitative. The indirect immunofluorescence method, by which the subpopulation of histamine receptor bearing lymphocytes can be easily double stained to concurrently identify the B cell marker, revealed that PBL, the B cell and T cell fraction of bovine PBL contained 18.4, 52.8 and 9.3% histamine receptor bearing cells, respectively. This method was found to be more stable and more easily quantifiable than the other two methods. Blocking tests using the histamine H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine and the histamine H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine suggested that bovine PBL have both H1 and H2 receptors on their surfaces. Addition of histamine into cultures of PBL at the concentration range 10(-6) to 10(-3) M suppressed the response of PBL to the mitogen phytohemagglutinin. The histamine induced suppression of mitogenesis could be reduced partially by the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine, but not by the H1 antagonist diphenhydramine. It is possible that histamine induced suppression of PBL mitogenesis was mediated by H2 receptors on T cells.

Animals↗