Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Choledocholithiasis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Management of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation are common, and the evaluation of newer treatment options compared with standard surgical treatment is important. In 62 liver transplants performed in 55 adult patients, the biliary tract was reconstructed with choledochocholedochostomy (CC) in 52 (84%) and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (RYCJ) in 10 (16%). Seventeen biliary tract complications occurred in 16 patients (29%). The incidence of complications was the same after CC and RYCJ. Eight complications (47%) occurred within the first month and nine (53%) thereafter. Only 6 of 17 (35%) biliary tract complications required operation. One patient died of a biliary tract complication. No other allografts were lost due to biliary tract complications. Four patients transplanted at other centers were also treated, for a total of 21 biliary tract complications. Overall, there were nine bile leaks, eight bile duct strictures, two Roux loop hemorrhages, one choledocholithiasis, and one ampullary dyskinesia. Temporary or permanent stents were used successfully in seven of eight strictures. Five bile leaks were managed without operation. Nonsurgical management is appropriate for a selected majority of patients with late bile leaks, biliary tract strictures, or choledocholithiasis after liver transplantation.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed1994

Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become the prime modality for removal of the gallbladder. However, as laparoscopic techniques for treating choledocholithiasis are evolving, we reviewed our experience with acute gallstone pancreatitis since the inception of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Between November 1989 and March 1993, we treated 57 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy was performed during the initial admission in 46 patients (81%, group I), while 11 (19%) underwent delayed cholecystectomy at a second admission 2 to 9 weeks later (group II). Within group I, eight patients (17%) were thought to have contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent open cholecystectomy. In the remaining 38 patients of group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed successfully. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 23 of these patients (61%) and endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 6 patients (26%). In four other patients, the intraoperative cholangiogram revealed common bile duct stones that were removed using laparoscopic techniques. The 11 patients in group II were all treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy; of these patients, 3 underwent preoperative endoscopic stone removal and 1 had choledocholithiasis managed laparoscopically. Postoperative hospitalization averaged 4 +/- 1 days (mean +/- SEM), and there was no major morbidity or 30-day mortality. This is the first large series of acute gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our experience suggests that laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without ERCP should be the primary approach for treating acute gallstone pancreatitis in the 1990s.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Laparoscopic approaches to the common bile duct stone: transcystic bile duct exploration, choledochotomy and stone fragmentation.

It has been illustrated that a convergence of new technologies, including advanced laparoscopic techniques, flexible video endoscopy, coaxial balloon dilators and biliary lithotripsy, has allowed the modern laparoscopic surgeon to address a pressing issue: how to deal with choledocholithiasis. A variety of techniques and methods have been described; each has their advocates, philosophical advantages and potential drawbacks. The definitive decision as to which technique is the best awaits the results of future prospective studies. Until then, the three techniques outlined will allow the majority of surgeons to extend the advantages of minimally invasive surgery to patients with choledocholithiasis. There is no doubt that this is desirable. These procedures, however, are not without their failure rate and complications, and they remain technically demanding. Increased education and training of surgeons is needed and further improvement of existing technology is demanded. This includes improved fibreoptic choledochoscopes with better optics, more flexibility and larger working channels; better stone baskets and better mechanical graspers, and safer and more effective stone lithotriptors. Other questions remain unanswered, such as the relative and absolute contraindications to performing laparoscopic common duct explorations. Can patients with multiple common duct stones or very small ducts be safely handled using these methods? Is there a size of common duct stone that is safe to leave behind, and are there safe antegrade methods of treating distal duct stenosis? The new interest in avoiding the placement of T-tubes for common duct drainage also needs close scrutiny. All these questions need well-constructed studies to answer them; but in the meantime, laparoscopic common duct exploration is undoubtedly here to stay, and this new approach to an old problem is inducing biliary surgeons to question many traditionally held dicta, which can in the long run only be in the patients' best interest.

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗
PubMed2004

A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the national incidence and risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND: Most series reporting the rates at which laparoscopic cholecystectomies are performed, relative to the open procedure, have come from centers specializing in laparoscopic surgery. The rates at which conversions occur from these centers may not reflect those in community practice. We sought to determine the actual, and therefore acceptable, conversion rate by examining nationally representative discharge data. METHODS: The National Hospital Discharge database for 1998 to 2001 was acquired from the Centers for Disease Control. All gallbladder disease related admissions were extracted, and the cholecystectomies (ICD-9-CM codes 51.2X) were analyzed using the SAS package. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine what factors were associated with the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of all cholecystectomies are performed by the open technique. Of the remaining 75%, there is an approximately 5% to 10% conversion rate. The major risk factors for conversion included male sex, obesity, and cholecystitis. Concurrent choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis, and cholecystitis were associated with a conversion rate of 25%. Length of stay (LOS) was reduced for laparoscopic operations and although conversion added 2 to 3 days to the LOS, for most cases the LOS was still less than for primary open operations. CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of all cholecystectomies are performed laparoscopically, and the national conversion rate is 5% to 10%. Cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, male sex, and obesity are major predictors for conversion. The data presented in terms of conversion rates and LOS were derived from population-adjusted hospital discharge data and represent the current U.S. experience for cholecystectomy. From these data the community experience for conversion rates, risk factors, and LOS can be derived.

Cholecystectomy↗
PubMed2005

Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.

OBJECTIVES: New modalities, namely, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and helical computed-tomographic cholangiography (HCT-C), have been introduced recently for the detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones and shown improved detectability compared to conventional ultrasound or computed tomography. We conducted this study to compare the diagnostic ability of EUS, MRCP, and HCT-C in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients clinically suspected of having CBD stones were enrolled, excluding those with cholangitis or a definite history of choledocholithiasis. Each patient underwent EUS, MRCP, and HCT-C prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), the result of which served as the diagnostic gold standard. RESULTS: CBD stones were detected in 24 (86%) of 28 patients by ERCP/IDUS. The sensitivity of EUS, MRCP, and HCT-C was 100%, 88%, and 88%, respectively. False negative cases for MRCP and HCT-C had a CBD stone smaller than 5mm in diameter. No serious complications occurred while one patient complained of itching in the eyelids after the infusion of contrast agent on HCT-C. CONCLUSIONS: When examination can be scheduled, MRCP or HCT-C will be the first choice because they were less invasive than EUS. MRCP and HCT-C had similar detectability but the former may be preferable considering the possibility of allergic reaction in the latter. When MRCP is negative, EUS is recommended to check for small CBD stones.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Technical complications are rising as common duct exploration is becoming rare.

BACKGROUND: Both hospital and surgeon volume influence outcomes. With introduction of new technologies, some procedures are now performed less frequently. ERCP has replaced the need for common duct exploration (CDE) in most cases of choledocholithiasis. We explored the secular trends and outcomes of CDE and how they have changed relative to introduction of ERCP. STUDY DESIGN: The National Hospital Discharge Survey database was analyzed for the years 1979 to 2001. Procedural frequency of ERCP and CDE was determined. Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices were used to characterize patients' disease burden for the years 1993 to 2001. Length of stay, mortality, and complication rates for each procedure were determined. RESULTS: At the beginning of the study period, an estimated 47,000 CDEs were performed annually. These declined to 7,700 per year as ERCP increased to 42,500 procedures per year at the end of the study period. CDE complication rates increased from 3.4% to 17.4% over the same period. Comorbidity analysis for the years 1993 to 2001 revealed that ERCP and CDE patients had equivalent disease burdens. Technical complication rates rose in parallel to the increased overall CDE complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP has replaced the need for most but not all CDE. With diminished CDE experience at a national level, the complication rate has markedly increased, at least in part from technical complications. Both choledocholithiasis treatment algorithms and clinical training paradigms need to account for the rarity of CDE and high complication rates associated with it, by incorporation of training modules in surgical residencies and advocating referral to centers having expertise in biliary tract operations from surgeons with little CDE experience.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present, and the future.

BACKGROUND: The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has created a dilemma for treating patients with known or suspected choledocholithiasis. With rapid technologic growth and experience in laparoscopic skills, many surgeons are now routinely performing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and questioning the wisdom of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature on the subject of LCBDE and critically evaluate the clinical results of this emerging technology. METHODS: Medline and Science Citation Index databases were used to search English language articles published on LCBDE since 1989. RESULTS: Transcystic common bile duct exploration has a better clearance rate, and carries less morbidity and mortality compared with laparoscopic choledochotomy. Compared with two-stage ERCP and LC, one-stage LC and LCBDE seems to be associated with a shorter hospital stay, a quicker recovery, less expense, and less morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LCBDE is a feasible, safe and effective procedure that carries a low morbidity and mortality and will decrease the need for unnecessary ERC in the future for suspected or proved choledocholithiasis.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Surgical management and long-term follow-up of patients with choledochal cysts.

The medical records of 46 patients treated for choledochal cysts at Kyushu University from 1965 to 1990 were reviewed, and long-term follow-up results were evaluated based on the type of cyst and on the choice of surgical procedure. Of 46 patients, 41 (89%) were female and 5 (11%) were male, with a mean age of 24 years at the time of the initial operation. Seventy-eight percent of patients presented with an abdominal pain, 43% with jaundice, and 33% with an abdominal mass. Only seven patients (15%) presented with the classic triad. According to the Todani classification system, 26 patients (57%) had type I cysts, 2 (4%) had type II, and 18 (39%) had type IV. Four patients (9%) had biliary tract carcinoma. At the time of the initial operation, the major associated diseases were cholangitis in 15% and choledocholithiasis in 26% of cases. In 24 patients who had undergone previous cyst enterostomy, cholangitis developed in 88%, choledocholithiasis in 25%, and hepatolithiasis in 33% of patients, indicating a high complication rate after cyst enterostomy. Seventy percent of these patients needed reoperation. In contrast, cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy gave excellent long-term results. Thus, cyst excision with hepaticojejunostomy is the definitive treatment of choice for type I and IV choledochal cysts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Biliary lithiasis and helminthiasis.

The syndrome of Oriental cholangiohepatitis is characterized by helminthiasis, choledocholithiasis often without cholecystolithiasis, biliary duct stricture and hepatic abscess. The common duct stones are usually multiple, black and friable. Fourteen cases have been seen in recent immigrants to the United States. Thirteen patients had choledocholithiasis, and 1 had viable flukes in the ducts. Choledochoenterostomy is usually required because of multiple stones, including intrahepatic stones, or proven or presumed infestation with Clonorchis sinensis. The latter, the Chinese liver fluke, is an infestation for which medical therapy does not exist. Resection, particularly of the lateral segment of the left hepatic lobe, may be required in cases of abscess and stones associated with stricture of the left hepatic duct.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a new, noninvasive imaging technique for the visualization of the biliary ducts with cholangiographic images similar to those obtained with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. No contrast medium injection is used. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of MRCP versus ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary tract and pancreatic diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were submitted to MRCP. They were referred to MR study according to four inclusion criteria: (1) evidence or suspicion of choledocholithiasis, (2) benign or malignant bile ducts stenosis, (3) follow-up of patients submitted to biliary-enteric anastomosis, and (4) chronic pancreatitis with Wirsung duct dilatation. The MRCP was performed with a 0.5T superconducting magnet (Philips Gyroscan T5). When neoplastic disease was detected, additional images on axial planes were acquired. MRCP allowed images of diagnostic value to be obtained in all the cases. RESULTS: In choledocholithiasis, MRCP showed 91.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy 96.8%. Of 48 patients with stenotic lesions, 16 were correctly characterized as benign and 30 as malignant. Two cases of focal chronic pancreatitis were misdiagnosed as pancreatic head carcinoma. In the patients submitted to biliary-enteric anastomosis, MCRP was able to detect the dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts, the stenosis, and associated stones in all 8 positive cases. In the remaining 7 patients with mild signs of cholangitis, MCRP showed irregular aspects of the biliary tree in the main ducts. In the 11 patients with chronic pancreatitis, MCRP was able to depict the dilated Wirsung duct and the stenotic tract, although the fine details of the secondary ducts were not evaluated due to the low spatial resolution as compared with conventional films. CONCLUSIONS: MRCP can be considered a technique able to completely replace diagnostic ERCP. Further studies are necessary for a better evaluation of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this technique.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative management of gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/LC) should reduce hospital stay when compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy/intraoperative cholangiogram (LC/IOC) and selective common bile duct exploration (CBDE). METHOD: Retrospective review of 82 patients with gallstone pancreatitis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had preoperative ERCP/LC and 51 patients underwent LC/IOC. Nineteen percent in the ERCP/LC group developed postprocedure pancreatitis. The presence of choledocholithiasis was associated with an increased incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (38%) and an increased length of stay ([LOS] 24 versus 10 days). The development of post-ERCP pancreatitis markedly increased LOS to 30 days. Six percent in the LC/IOC group developed postoperative pancreatitis. The mean LOS was 10.1 days. Open CBDE increased the LOS to 14.5 days. Postoperative pancreatitis increased the LOS to 23 days. The LOS of patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent uncomplicated ERCP/ES or LC/IOC with open CBDE was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The development of postprocedure pancreatitis is a more important determinant of hospital stay than an open operative procedure. LC/IOC with its lower incidence of postprocedure pancreatitis resulted in a shorter hospital LOS even when open CBDE was performed.

Cholangiography↗
PubMed1998

Surgical considerations in the contemporary management of biliary tract disease in the postpartum period.

BACKGROUND: Excluding sterilization procedures, no experience with laparoscopic procedures in the postpartum period has been reported. The postpartum patient may have unique characteristics that must be recognized for safe management. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 1,100 consecutive biliary patients in a private surgical practice since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The group includes 34 patients who presented with biliary tract disease and were operated upon within 6 weeks of obstetrical delivery. Laparoscopic procedures were performed on these 34 patients 1 to 42 days following vaginal (26) or Cesarean (8) deliveries. RESULTS: All patients had calculous cholecystitis. Choledocholithiasis was documented in 10 (29%) patients, including 3 patients (9%) with missed common duct stones, and strongly suggested in 5 (15%) others. Open biliary procedures were required for 2 patients. One patient returned to surgery for an ERCP-related complication. Follow up is known for all patients. There were no delayed complications. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to biliary tract disease in the postpartum period is safe. Recent vertical Cesarean incisions can withstand the strain of a reduced pneumoperitoneum. The high incidence of choledocholithiasis calls for routine cholangiography in the postpartum patient.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Traditional surgical management of common bile duct stones: a prospective study during a 20-year experience.

PURPOSE: To analyze the operative findings and evaluate the hospital morbidity and mortality. This experience is documented in order to provide a basis for comparison with therapeutic alternatives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 579 patients who underwent elective (n = 443) or emergent (n = 136) operations between 1970 and 1990. Their mean age was 60.1 years. Prior biliary symptoms were present in 96% and suggestive of choledocholithiasis in 69%. Acute pancreatitis was associated in 3%. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy was performed with intraoperative cholangiography in 85% of cases. Stones were extracted via the cystic duct in 18%, through a choledochotomy in 79%, and through an additional sphincterotomy in 3%. Cholangioscopy has been routinely used since 1977. The incidence of extraction of the stones via the cystic duct increased and the incidence of biliary-enteric bypass decreased significantly during the second decade. Complications occurred in 24.5% of the patients. General complications were significantly fewer in the second decade than in the first (6% versus 15%). The main biliary complications were related to biliary tubes (5%) and retained stones (5%). Ten patients (2%) required early reoperation. The overall mortality rate was 0.3%. Mortality was 1.4% after emergency operations and zero after elective operations and in patients under 60 years of age. The mean stay was 16.6 +/- 7.2 days, decreasing with time. CONCLUSION: Traditional open surgery is an effective and safe option for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. The choice between open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopic sphincterotomy should be made for each patient according to the local availability and efficacy of these methods.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of biliary tract disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRCP was performed in 100 patients in whom direct cholangiographic correlation (ERCP, n = 98; PTC, n = 9; intraoperative cholangiography, n = 3) was available for comparison. The MRCP examinations were performed using a two-dimensional multi-slice, fast spin echo (FSE) technique and a local surface coil. The diagnoses at direct cholangiography were choledocholithiasis in 30 patients, benign and malignant strictures in 28 patients and normal bile ducts in 42 patients. The nature of the strictures (benign, n = 2; tumour, n = 18; lymphnode recurrence, n = 3; unknown histology, n = 5) was determined by one or more of the following procedures: surgery (n = 8), biopsy (n = 15), cytology (n = 6) and cross-sectional imaging/follow-up findings (n = 3). RESULTS: MRCP diagnosed choledocholithiasis with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 99% and accuracy of 97 %. It resulted in two false-negative and one false-positive findings when compared with direct cholangiography. MRCP accurately diagnosed the presence and level of strictures in all patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRCP in the detection of bile duct lesions were 97%, 98% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRCP has a high diagnostic accuracy when compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of bile duct disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Linear EUS for bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: Radial scanning endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been shown, in experienced hands, to be a safe and accurate means of detecting bile duct stones. We compared linear array EUS with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in our first 50 cases, to evaluate efficacy of this examination as well as the learning curve for this indication. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 50 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. We compared results of EUS with those of ERCP as a reference. First a linear EUS examination was performed followed by ERCP, at a median interval of 31 days (range 3 to 162 days). RESULTS: The average age of patients was 56 years (range 26 to 76); 48% were women. Fifteen (30%) had undergone cholecystectomy, a mean of 8.5 years (range 1 to 22) before the EUS. EUS compared with ERCP had a 97% sensitivity, 77% specificity, and 90% accuracy. In 14% of patients EUS provided an additional or alternative diagnosis: chronic pancreatitis (n = 3), duodenitis (2), bile duct stricture (1), chronic gastritis (1). No complications were encountered due to EUS. CONCLUSIONS: We found in this early experience that linear array EUS is a reasonably safe and accurate means of detecting choledocholithiasis. Linear array EUS, despite the learning curve, seems to be about equivalent to radial EUS in accuracy. Appropriate use of this less invasive technique may possibly replace the use of diagnostic ERCP.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2002

ERCP in patients with long-limb Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and intact papilla.

BACKGROUND: ERCP by means of long-limb Roux-en-Y surgical anastomoses has been reported primarily in patients with biliary or pancreatic anastamoses, but rarely in patients with an intact papilla. METHODS: All ERCP procedures attempted over a 6-year interval in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomies and an intact papilla were reviewed. Patients with a prior Billroth II operation or alteration of the major papilla were excluded. Cannulation and therapy were primarily performed with a duodenoscope after exploration and placement of a guidewire in the afferent limb with a forward-viewing colonoscope. In some cases the duodenoscope was pulled into the afferent limb with a wire-guided balloon passed retrograde into the afferent limb. A follow-up of 30 days was obtained for all patients as part of a prospective ERCP outcome study. RESULTS: Of 15 patients in whom ERCP was attempted, the papilla was reached in 10 patients (67%), the bile duct being accessed in all 10. Needle-knife precut papillotomy after placement of a pancreatic duct stent was performed in 3 patients. Biliary sphincterotomy with a variety of techniques was successful in all 9 patients in whom it was attempted. Other maneuvers included stone extraction, sphincter of Oddi manometry, and biliary stent placement. Final diagnoses were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (6), malignant biliary stricture (2), choledocholithiasis plus tumor (1), and choledocholithiasis (1). Complications occurred after 3 (12%) of 25 ERCP procedures including pancreatitis (1 mild, 1 moderate) and bleeding (1 mild), all in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP was ultimately successful in two thirds of patients with long-limb gastrojejunostomies and an intact papilla. The success of the ERCP is determined primarily by ability to advance a duodenoscope through the afferent limb. Once the major papilla was accessed with a duodenoscope, advanced biliary and pancreatic therapeutic techniques were feasible.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation causes transient pancreatobiliary and duodenobiliary reflux.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation reduces sphincter function at least transiently or partially, which may allow pancreatobiliary and duodenobiliary reflux to occur. This study prospectively evaluated pancreatobiliary and duodenobiliary reflux after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. METHODS: In 12 patients with choledocholithiasis, ductal bile was sampled for amylase concentration and bacterial culture during ERCP, before and at 7 days to 5 years after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. To provide comparative and control data, ductal bile was sampled in 12 patients with gallbladder cholesterol polyps and 6 with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction who did not undergo endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. RESULTS: Amylase concentrations in ductal bile from patients with choledocholithiasis before endoscopic papillary balloon dilation were marginally significantly higher (before Bonferroni correction) compared with concentrations in bile from patients with gallbladder polyps. The concentration of amylase in bile was significantly increased at 7 days after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation compared with that before endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; the level was comparable with that of patients with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction. Subsequently, the amylase concentration gradually decreased and was approximately equal to the pre-endoscopic papillary balloon dilation level at 1 year. Bacteriocholia was frequent (67%-92%) for up to 3 months after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation but was rare thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation causes transient pancreatobiliary and duodenobiliary reflux. However, reflux is no longer present at 1 year after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.

Adenoma, Bile Duct↗
PubMed2005

Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.

BACKGROUND: ERCP is used selectively in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). In patients with ABP, ERCP often is difficult and has the potential to cause further damage. In addition, the prevalence of residual choledocholithiasis in ABP is low (<30%). EUS and MRCP accurately diagnose choledocholithiasis, but the performance of MRCP may be inferior in ABP. EUS, with ERCP when a stone is seen, has been shown to be feasible. This study assessed the relative costs and outcomes of EUS and MRCP in patients with ABP compared with standard care involving selective ERCP. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed, modeling standard care for nonsevere ABP (selective ERCP) and severe ABP (ERCP with sphincterotomy and balloon sweep). The other arms included either EUS or MRCP first, with the conversion to or the addition of ERCP when a bile-duct stone was seen. Probabilities and accuracy of EUS and MRCP were taken from published data. Costs were locally quantified in Canadian dollars (CDN), including nursing/technical/professional personnel, equipment maintenance, and disposable equipment. The robustness of assumptions was tested by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Overall, EUS in all patients with ABP was marginally dominant compared with standard care with selective ERCP ($58 CDN per patient less expensive; 0.9% fewer cases of pancreatitis [ERCP-related or recurrent]). In the severe ABP subgroup, EUS was more clearly dominant ($742 CDN per patient less expensive; 3% fewer cases of pancreatitis), and the nonsevere subgroup had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $17,000 per case of pancreatitis avoided. MRCP was more expensive than EUS in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is dominant in severe ABP. In nonsevere ABP, it is slightly more costly but is associated with fewer ERCPs and ERCP-related complications. A randomized trial would help to quantify the benefits of avoiding ERCP in these patients.

Acute Disease↗