Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Back pain as a secondary disability in persons with lower limb amputations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency, duration, intensity, and interference of back pain in a sample of persons with lower limb amputations. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-based survey from clinical databases. PARTICIPANTS: Participants who were 6 or more months post lower limb amputation (n = 255). INTERVENTION: An amputation pain survey that included several standardized pain measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, duration, intensity, and interference of back pain. RESULTS: Of the participants who completed the survey (return rate, 56%), 52% reported experiencing persistent, bothersome back pain. Of these, 43% reported average back pain intensity in the mild range (1-4 on 0-10 rating scale) and 25% reported pain of moderate intensity (5-6 on 0-10 scale). Most respondents with back pain rated the interference of their pain on function as none to minimal. However, nearly 25% of those with back pain described it as frequent, of severe intensity (>or=7 on 0-10 scale), and as severely interfering with daily activities including social, recreational, family, and work activities. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain may be surprisingly common in persons with lower limb amputations, and, for some who experience it, may greatly interfere with function.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

Bone density in chronic low back pain: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Levels of physical activity in chronic low back pain patients are relatively low due to their fear of provoking pain. This may have a secondary impact on maintenance of bone mass. The objective of this study is to determine if patients with chronic low back pain are at a higher risk of bone demineralization. DESIGN: Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 25 chronic low back pain patients at the lumbar spine, hip and distal forearm. SETTING: A university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five chronic low back pain patients (mean age 45 years) enrolled on a residential back pain rehabilitation programme. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (52%) were osteopenic or osteoporotic in one or more sites. BMD at the lumbar spine was generally lower than the mean BMD of age-matched subjects (p = 0.04). There was no significant relationship between BMD and duration of pain, disability, sex or previous surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic low back pain patients have an increased incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. This finding reinforces the importance of motivating patients to incorporate exercise into daily life. Given the limited set of subjects used in the present study, further studies are required.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment as a complementary treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteopathic manipulative treatment may be useful for acute or subacute low back pain. However, its role in chronic low back pain is unclear. METHODS: This trial was conducted in a university-based clinic from 2000 through 2001. Of the 199 subjects who responded to recruitment procedures, 91 met the eligibility criteria. They were randomized, with 82 patients completing the 1-month follow-up evaluation, 71 completing the 3-month evaluation, and 66 completing the 6-month evaluation. The subjects were randomized to osteopathic manipulative treatment, sham manipulation, or a no-intervention control group, and they were allowed to continue their usual care for low back pain. The main outcomes included the SF-36 Health Survey, a 10-cm visual analog scale for overall back pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, lost work or school days because of back pain, and satisfaction with back care. RESULTS: As compared with the no-intervention control subjects, the patients who received osteopathic manipulative treatment reported greater improvements in back pain, greater satisfaction with back care throughout the trial, better physical functioning and mental health at 1 month, and fewer cotreatments at 6 months. The subjects who received sham manipulation also reported greater improvements in back pain and physical functioning and greater satisfaction than the no-intervention control subjects. There were no significant benefits with osteopathic manipulative treatment, as compared with sham manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits when used in addition to usual care for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2001

Vocational rehabilitation of workers with back pain.

This paper concerns the concepts and practices currently in use in occupational health for the rehabilitation of workers with back pain. No conclusive evidence exists for an etiologic model for nonspecific back pain. A difference between acute and chronic back pain is backed up by evidence from the literature. Apart from having the patient stay active and return to ordinary activities as early as possible, there are no significant forms of intervention for acute back pain that effectively decrease the time off work. For chronic back pain multidisciplinary treatment in an occupational setting is effective in enhancing return to work. Clinical practice guidelines consist of diagnostic triage, the assessment of "red flags" for medical emergencies, and guidance in the appropriate application of diagnostic facilities. Occupational health guidelines concentrate on gradual return to work, psychosocial issues, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation facilities.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation of an educational low back pain prevention program for hospital employees.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of an educational low back pain prevention program in a cohort of hospital employees. METHODS: A cohort of 136 nonclerical hospital employees attended classes on safe postures and patient handling, then received advice by educators who observed them while they performed their typical workday tasks. Each of the subjects in this intervention group was matched on age, sex, and job category with a control. Musculoskeletal complaints and changes in habits during work and recreational activities were evaluated before the intervention (or the corresponding date in the control group) and after two years. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 36% of subjects with low back pain at baseline were free of this symptom at follow-up, whereas only 26% were in the opposite situation. The proportion of subjects with low back pain episodes lasting longer than 30 days increased significantly from baseline to follow-up in the control group (from 30% to 49%) but not in the intervention group. The number of sick leaves longer than 30 days decreased significantly in the intervention group. Only 33% of the intervention group subjects felt the intervention had been helpful; this proportion varied across job categories. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that differences in job categories should be taken into account when designing educational programs for preventing low back pain. They also indicate that back school programs may be more effective in subjects with a history of low back pain, whereas instruction on safe postures and patient handling may be the best approach in subjects who have not previously experienced low back pain. Observing and providing advice to employees while they are performing their usual duties may be an essential component of low back pain prevention.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the claim that 90% of episodes of low back pain that present to general practice have resolved within one month. DESIGN: Prospective study of all adults consulting in general practice because of low back pain over 12 months with follow up at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after consultation. SETTING: Two general practices in south Manchester. 490 subjects (203 men, 287 women) aged 18-75 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients who have ceased to consult with low back pain after 3 months; proportion of patients who are free of pain and back related disability at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Annual cumulative consultation rate among adults in the practices was 6.4%. Of the 463 patients who consulted with a new episode of low back pain, 275 (59%) had only a single consultation, and 150 (32%) had repeat consultations confined to the 3 months after initial consultation. However, of those interviewed at 3 and 12 months follow up, only 39/188 (21%) and 42/170 (25%) respectively had completely recovered in terms of pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with the interpretation that 90% of patients with low back pain in primary care will have stopped consulting with symptoms within three months. However most will still be experiencing low back pain and related disability one year after consultation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

An agenda for primary care research on low back pain.

In October 1995, an International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain was held in Seattle, Washington. The Forum focused on the broad range of decisions that patients and their primary care providers make concerning how to best manage low back pain. In addition to providing a venue for summarizing the current state of knowledge about these issues, a major goal of the Forum was to draft an agenda for future primary care research on low back pain. Previous efforts to delineate priority areas for research in this field have emphasized the concerns of basic scientists, pain specialists, and surgeons while ignoring the major concerns of patients and providers in the primary care setting, where the majority of patients with back pain are seen. This article describes the group consensus process used to draft an agenda, presents the items included, and contrasts this primary care agenda with agendas for back pain research developed primarily by specialists. This agenda identifies for the first time the clinical and methodologic issues that primary care experts on back pain consider to be of highest priority. Hopefully, it will help focus future primary care research and encourage funding agencies to give priority to the issues identified.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Smoking and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 41 journal articles reporting 47 epidemiologic studies.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the epidemiologic literature on smoking and low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether smoking causes low back pain and whether cessation of smoking reduces the incidence and/or prevalence of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It seems to have become increasingly commonly accepted that smoking causes low back pain and that abstinence from smoking is an effective means for its prevention and treatment. Does the evidence in the epidemiologic literature support this concept? METHODS: Forty-one original research reports reporting 47 studies, published between 1974 and 1996, were systematically reviewed for strength of association, dose-response correlation, temporality, reduction of symptoms with smoke cessation, and consistency of findings. In addition, the presence of positive findings was viewed in light of definition of low back pain, representativeness of the study sample, sample size, and in relation to whether the prime objective had been to study the smoking-low back pain issue. Two reviews were performed by the author, blindly and separated by a 2-month interval. RESULTS: There was no consistency of statistically significant positive associations between smoking and low back pain. The association, when present, was usually weak and clearly apparent only in large study samples. No other study characteristics had an effect on the frequency of positive associations. Additional analyses were therefore performed only on studies with large samples. In general, these did not contain consistent positive findings in relation to dose-response, temporality, or reversibility. Signs of causality were consistently evident only in the study with the largest sample (n > 30,000). CONCLUSIONS: Presently, smoking should be considered a weak risk indicator and not a cause of low back pain.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

Back and hip extensor activities during trunk flexion/extension: effects of low back pain and rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare lumbar paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscle function during sagittal trunk flexion and extension in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects, and to assess the influence of rehabilitation in the back pain patients. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study comparing chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls, and a prospective follow-up in back pain patients during rehabilitation. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. SUBJECTS: Nineteen women with chronic low back pain, and 19 women without pain (controls). INTERVENTION: Five-week active outpatient rehabilitation (1 hour three times a week) guided by a physiotherapist, followed by 5-week self-motivated exercise at home. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects performed sagittal trunk flexion and extension while surface electromyogram was bilaterally recorded of paraspinal (L1-L2 level), gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles. The muscle activity was assessed from the average electromyogram and the relative muscle activation onsets and their duration were calculated. RESULTS: During early flexion, lumbar paraspinal and biceps femoris were activated simultaneously before gluteus maximus. At the end of flexion and during extension all investigated muscles were activated and relaxed in order. Lumbar paraspinal and biceps femoris muscles were activated in a similar order in low back pain patients and healthy controls during flexion and extension. However, the duration of gluteus maximus activity was shorter in the back pain patients than in controls during the trunk flexion (p<.05), and it ended earlier during extension. Active rehabilitation did not change the muscle activities of lumbar paraspinal and biceps femoris in the back pain patients, but in the measurements after rehabilitation the onset of gluteus maximus activity occurred later in flexion and earlier in extension. CONCLUSIONS: The activity of the gluteus maximus muscle during the flexion-extension cycle was reduced in patients with chronic low back pain. The gluteal muscles should be taken into consideration in the rehabilitation of these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Pain-related correlates of MMPI profile subgroups among back pain patients.

The MMPI profiles of 96 male and 218 female patients attending a back pain clinic in a private university-affiliated, orthopedic hospital were analyzed by a hierarchical clustering procedure. The clustering procedure produced four male and four female profile subgroups. The subgroups were compared with one another on the basis of patients' responses to the Cornell Medical Index and revised McGill Pain Assessment Questionnaire. Within the male and female patient cohorts it was found that profile subgroups featuring elevated clinical scales showed greater disruptions of daily activities than did subgroups with relatively unelevated profiles. However, profile subgroups with elevations primarily on the neurotic triad scales reported greater affective disturbance and disruption of daily activities than did subgroups with elevations on both the neurotic triad and relatively psychotic scales. In addition, profile subgroups with subclinical elevations on the neurotic triad scales appeared to have adjusted to their pain experience more poorly than did subgroups that featured scores on nearly all clinical scales that were within one standard deviation of the mean. Suggestions are provided for the use of the MMPI in assessing chronic pain patients and future research regarding cluster analyses of patients' MMPI profiles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Review of chronic low back pain of facet joint origin.

Chronic low back pain secondary to involvement of the facet joints is a common problem. Facet joints have been recognized as potential sources of back pain since 1911. Multiple authors have described distributions of pain patterns of facet joint pain. The facet joints are paired diarthrodial articulations between the posterior elements of the adjacent vertebrae. Lumbar facet joints are innervated by medial branches of the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves from the L1 to L4 levels. At L5, the dorsal ramus travels between the ala of the sacrum and its superior articular process and divides into medial and lateral branches at the caudal edge of the process. Each segmental medial branch of the dorsal ramus supplies at least two facet joints. The existence of lumbar facet joint pain claims has a preponderance of evidence, even though there are a few detractors. Multiple studies utilizing controlled diagnostic blocks have established the prevalence of lumbar facet joint involvement in patients with chronic low back pain, as ranging from 15% to 52%, based on type of population and setting studied. Long-term therapeutic benefit has been reported from three types of interventions in managing lumbar facet joint pain, including intraarticular injections, medial branch blocks and neurolysis of medial branches. This review will discuss chronic low back of facet joint origin and covers anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and various aspects related to treatment, including clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, technical aspects and complications.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain: a follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: An observational follow-up. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the role of physical exercise and inactivity on the long-term outcome after active outpatient low back rehabilitation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is considerable evidence documenting the efficacy of exercise in the conservative treatment of chronic low back pain, but the role of exercises after the guided treatment period on the long-term success and maintenance of the results is not known. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients with low back pain, who had participated in a 12-week active low back rehabilitation program, were asked about subjective pain and disability on the average of 14 months after the treatment. The outcomes were defined as a recurrence of persistent pain and work absenteeism, and a survival or failure analysis was performed between those who had continued exercising and who had been physically inactive. RESULTS: Recurrences of persistent pain during the follow-up period were fewer (P = 0.03) among those who had maintained regular exercise habits after the treatment than among those who had been physically inactive. Similarly, work absenteeism was less (P < 0.01) among physically active than among physically inactive persons. However, patients with good outcome in pain reduction after low back pain rehabilitation were more likely to participate in physical exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Exercises are beneficial after guided treatment in the maintenance of the results of active treatment for recurrent chronic low back pain in the long term, but those with less favorable outcome in rehabilitation are less likely to participate in exercises afterward. In active treatment programs, it is recommended that exercises be incorporated after the guided treatment.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2004

Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common medical and social problem frequently associated with disability and absence from work. However, data on effective return to work after interventions for low back pain are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior-oriented graded activity program compared with usual care. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Occupational health services department of an airline company in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 134 workers who were absent from work because of low back pain were randomly assigned to either graded activity (n = 67) or usual care (n = 67). INTERVENTION: Graded activity, a physical exercise program based on operant-conditioning behavioral principles, to stimulate a rapid return to work. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were the number of days of absence from work because of low back pain, functional status (Roland Disability Questionnaire), and severity of pain (11-point numerical scale). RESULTS: The median number of days of absence from work over 6 months of follow-up was 58 days in the graded activity group and 87 days in the usual care group. From randomization onward, graded activity was effective after 50 days of absence from work (hazard ratio, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2 to 3.2]; P = 0.009). The graded activity group was more effective in improving functional status and pain than the usual care group. The effects, however, were small and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Graded activity was more effective than usual care in reducing the number of days of absence from work because of low back pain.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1992

Low back pain and disability in 14-year-old schoolchildren.

In this cross-sectional prevalence study in 1503 14-year-old Finnish schoolchildren (n = 1503) low back pain was found to be the third most common form of pain interfering with schoolwork or leisure time during the past 12 months. The lifetime cumulative incidence of low back pain was 30% and that of sciatica 1.8%. Of the 417 pupils who had experienced low back pain at some time, 39% had suffered during the past month; 65% recovered in one month from the last pain episode, while 35.2% of those reporting disabling low back pain during the past year were aware of recurrent or continual pain. Thus, 7.8% (n = 107) of the whole population could be classified as "low back pain chronics": 86% of the low back pain chronics had trouble with at least one of the daily activities listed, most commonly with sitting at school. Excluding pain in the extremities or sciatica, girls reported various pains more commonly than boys. Moreover, girls reporting recurrent low back pain had more trouble with their daily activities due to pain than boys (p < 0.001), even though the recovery from the last pain episode took the same time in boys and girls. The pupils who had had sciatica at some time, in addition to recurrent low back pain, had more trouble with the 10 daily activities than others with recurrent low back pain (p = 0.014).

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2004

Genetic and environmental contributions to back pain in old age: a study of 2,108 danish twins aged 70 and older.

STUDY DESIGN: Self-reported 1-month prevalence of back pain in older twins assessed at intake in a population-based longitudinal survey. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to back pain in old age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To date, genetic contributions to back pain in old age have not been assessed, to the authors' best knowledge. METHODS: Interview data given at entry into a nationwide cohort-sequential population-based survey of Danish twins aged 70 years and older in 1995, 1997, 1999, and 2001 form the basis of this analysis. Analysis of twin similarity was estimated using probandwise concordance rates, odds ratios, and tetrachoric correlations for back pain. Heritability (proportion of the population variance attributable to genetic variation) was estimated by bivariate probit estimation and adjusted for known significant environmental factors. Odds ratios for known environmental effects were estimated after controlling for age, sex, and genetic effects. RESULTS: Modest and nonsignificant differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs were found for probandwise concordance rates, odds ratios, and tet-rachoric correlations for both men and women. In the bivariate probit estimation, a current or previous diagnosis of osteoporosis, degenerative joint disease, or lumbar disc prolapse was found to significantly affect the risk of back pain. Additive genetic effects explained approximately one fourth of the liability to report back pain in men and none of the occurrence in women. Individual environmental effects were found to explain roughly 75% of the occurrence of back pain in men and 100% in women. CONCLUSIONS: Additive genetic effects are modest contributors to back pain in older men but not in women. A current or previous medical diagnosis of osteoporosis, degenerative joint disease, or lumbar disc prolapse is-strongly associated with back pain, also when genetic factors are controlled for. Because of inherent methodologic issues, this estimate of the genetic influence on back pain in old age is probably conservative.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2002

Incidence of foot rotation, pelvic crest unleveling, and supine leg length alignment asymmetry and their relationship to self-reported back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of pelvic unleveling, foot rotation, and supine leg length alignment asymmetry in a nonclinical population and to examine the validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of these visual tests and their relationship to self-reported back pain. DESIGN: Volunteers answered a questionnaire regarding back pain and were then examined by a chiropractor who was unaware of the status of their back pain. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four unscreened volunteers answered the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association of visual tests with back pain and their validity indices; Visual Analogue Scale ratings. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent (n = 74) of volunteers examined had supine leg length alignment asymmetry (LLA). Pain intensity on a Visual Analogue Scale was significantly higher (P <.001) for those demonstrating supine LLA than for those without LLA. Those with back pain and recurrent back pain were significantly (P <.001) more likely to have supine LLA. The validity indices of the supine leg check showed acceptable levels for sensitivity (74%), specificity (78%), and positive predictive value (82%) [corrected] in recurrent back pain. Findings also indicated a high incidence of supine LLA in volunteers with chronic back pain (85%). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that, in this group of volunteers, the supine leg length alignment check had clinical validity as a stand-alone test for recurring back pain. Further testing on a larger, statistically defined cross-section of the population is recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Clinical elements of the diagnostic guidelines for low back pain].

If the majority of low back pain spontaneously recover in a few weeks, the main problem is to eliminate the possibility of a specific low back pain due to a serious underlying medical condition with radically different therapeutics and consequences. Medical history and physical examination will make it possible to detect these conditions (tumor, infection, spinal fracture, spondylarthropathy) and to specify useful complementary explorations. The second objective, for which we have few reliable clinical criteria, will consist in specifying the cause of low back problem. Lastly, it will be needed to detect the factors of risk of chronic course in order to improve the medical care which must be early.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: what are the relationships among methods and measures?

OBJECTIVES: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (PvO2 ) in subjects with low back pain. DESIGN: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. PvO2 was predicted from an equation. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between PvO2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. CONCLUSION: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. PvO2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.

Adult↗