Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACRYLIC RESINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources

In vitro fatigue fracture of an acrylic resin-based partial denture: an exploratory study.

In this study the fatigue life of heat-cured acrylic resin test specimens shaped as maxillary partial dentures was examined. Ten test specimens were prepared from polymethyl methacrylate and were tested by a constant force fatigue test at 150 N immersed in +37 degrees C water. The fatigue-fracture surfaces of the test specimens were compared with a one-bend fracture surface of the control specimen by scanning electron microscopy. The correlation coefficient between the number of loading cycles required to cause fatigue failure in the midline section was calculated as was the concentration of residual methyl methacrylate. Results revealed that the fatigue life of the test specimens varied greatly (483 x 10(3) +/- 371 x 10(3) cycles) and that the correlation between the number of loading cycles and the midline section was poor (r -0.455). The correlation coefficient between the number of loading cycles and the concentration of residual methyl methacrylate was r 0.476 and p > 0.5. The fatigue-fracture surface of the test specimens was smoother in texture on the tension side than on the one-bend fracture surface.

Denture Design↗

Effect of adhesive primer developed exclusively for heat-curing resin on adhesive strength between plastic artificial tooth and acrylic denture base resin.

Despite progress in the development of denture base resin and artificial tooth materials, dental clinics are still plagued with artificial teeth falling off the denture base--due to poor bond strength--after denture delivery. Against this background, this study sought to examine the effect and durability of an adhesive primer developed exclusively for heat-curing resin on the adhesive strength of heat-curing denture base acrylic resin to plastic artificial tooth. Test specimens were divided into four groups according to the treatment method of the artificial tooth's test bonding surface: air abrasion, adhesive primer application, adhesive primer application after air abrasion, and pretreatment only (control). After heat curing of acrylic resin onto the bonding surface, shear test was performed for two storage periods: 24-hour versus 100-day water storage. From the results obtained, it was revealed that the evaluated adhesive primer was significantly effective in increasing adhesive strength between artificial tooth and acrylic resin, although specimens were stored in water for 100 days.

Acrylic Resins↗

Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibres and acrylic denture base material.

This study was aimed at clarifying the effects of two different silane compounds on the adhesion between the different fibres and acrylic resin. The fibres used as reinforcement in the acrylic resin test specimens were glass, carbon and aramid fibres and the silane treated and untreated versions of each type of the fibres were tested. The fracture resistance of the test specimens were assessed and the fibres were studied by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to establish the adhesion between the fibres and acrylic resin. The results showed that silanization of glass and aramid fibres enhances the adhesion between the fibres and acrylic resin. The findings were confirmed by the SEM photographs taken. The use of a scanning electron microscope proved to be useful for the investigation of the adhesive properties of the materials used.

Acrylic Resins↗

Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Provisional restorations play a critical role in the success of restorative treatment. Thus, the provisional restoration must maintain its surface integrity throughout the restorative process. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the microhardness of 5 prosthodontic provisional materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylindrical samples of 3 bis-acryl resin composites (Integrity, Protemp Garant, Temphase) and 2 methyl methacrylate acrylic resins (Jet, Temporary Bridge) were fabricated (n = 5 per material). Specimens were wet-sanded through 600 grit abrasive and stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for a total of 14 days. Baseline Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured 24 hours after specimen fabrication. Three microhardness measurements were obtained from each specimen. Knoop hardness was again recorded after 14 days of storage. RESULTS: ANOVA and Duncan's tests (P<.05) indicated a significant difference between the methyl methacrylate type resins and the bis-acryl resin composites at both time intervals. CONCLUSION: The hardness of most materials (Integrity, Protemp Garant, Jet) decreased over time. All of the bis-acryl resin composite materials exhibited superior microhardness over traditional methyl methacrylate (Jet, Temporary Bridge) resins.

Analysis of Variance↗

Fabrication of a new crown and provisional to an existing removable partial denture.

A method of fabricating a new crown to an existing removable partial denture is described. A press-form plastic shell made from the diagnostic cast provides the outer contours for the abutment tooth, while an acrylic resin coping is fabricated on a die to provide accurate internal adaptation. The acrylic resin coping is seated on the prepared abutment. Autopolymerizing acrylic resin is mixed and placed in the plastic shell that is then placed in the mouth over the coping, forming the acrylic resin crown pattern. The removable partial prosthesis is fitted over the crown pattern intraorally. The pattern is transferred back to the die, the margins are refined, and the casting is completed and finished, avoiding reduction of the established contours. The same plastic shell is used with tooth-shaded acrylic resin to construct a provisional crown directly in the mouth. This technique allows the patient to wear the removable partial denture while the laboratory procedures are completed.

Crowns↗

Allergic contact dermatitis due to an epoxy acrylate.

A printer developed allergic contact dermatitis due to epoxy acrylate resin. Incomplete cross-reactivity between four epoxy acrylate resins and a lack of cross-reactivity to epoxy resin was demonstrated. The epoxy acrylate resin has been shown to be a potent cutaneous sensitizer for the guinea-pig.

Acrylates↗

[Investigation of water sorption and solubility of three denture soft lining materials].

This assay was made to investigate the water sorption and solubility of autopolymerizing hydrogel, acrylic resin and silicone denture soft lining materials. The test discs with 50 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness were prepared according to powder and liquid ratio. The weight of sample was measured after 24 h drying (m1). The sample was put into artificial saliva and distilled water for 7 d and 28 d, the moisture weight was measured after soaking (m2). After drying again, the last data of weight (m3) was acquired till the constant mass was recorded. Finally the values of water sorption and water solubility were calculated respectively with statistical analysis. The results showed the means of percentage about absorption at 7 d and 28 d were 28.62% and 24.96% for hydrogel, 1.89% and 1.65% for acrylic resin, 0.25% and 0.29% for silicone in artificial saliva. The percentage solubility at two stages were 0.56% and 0.51% for hydrogel, 0.74% and 0.83% for acrylic resin, 0.10% and 0.12% for silicone. In distilled water, the means of percentage about absorption at 7 d and 28 d were 30.15% and 27.85% for hydrogel, 3.64% and 6.17% for acrylic resin, 0.83% and 0.98% for silicone. The percentage solubility at two stages were 0.79% and 1.16% for hydrogel, 0.86% and 1.01% for acrylic resin, 0.10% and 0.14% for silicone respectively. The conclusion is that the order of percentage about absorption for these three denture soft lining materials were hydrogel > acrylic resin > silicone. The percentage solubility of acrylic resin was higher than that of the other two materials because of the plasticizer existing in acrylic resin material. In some degree, the ionic component increased may affect water sorption and solubility. Further clinical demonstration is needed for this hydrogel with higher percentage absorption.

Absorption↗

Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fracture strength of denture base resins is of great concern, and many approaches have been used to strengthen acrylic resin dentures. PURPOSE: This study measured the effect of 5 fiber strengtheners on the fracture resistance of denture base acrylic resin material. Impact strength, transverse strength, deflection, and elasticity modulus values of a heat-polymerized denture base resin (Trevalon), reinforced with glass, carbon, thin Kevlar, thick Kevlar, and polyethylene fibers in woven form were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred acrylic resin test specimens reinforced with woven fibers were fabricated. The control group consisted of 20 specimens with no fiber reinforcement. For the impact strength test, a Charpy-type impact tester was used. Transverse strength was assessed with a 3-point bending test by using a screw-driven mechanical testing machine. Ten specimens were used for each test. RESULTS: The highest impact test values were produced by polyethylene-reinforced group, and the lowest values were obtained from specimens containing no fibers. There were significant differences among the test groups, but no significant differences in transverse strength were found. The lowest transverse strength values were obtained for specimens strengthened with polyethylene fibers, which also insignificantly decreased transverse strength of the acrylic resin. CONCLUSION: The impact strength of denture base acrylic resins was increased with fibers in woven form. Tested fibers did not have a significant effect on the transverse strengths.

Analysis of Variance↗

Flexural and thermal cycling of resins for veneering removable overlay dentures.

OBJECTIVES: This investigation compared the effect of flexural and thermal cycling upon resins, bonded via adhesive primers to cobalt-chromium alloy to identify appropriate materials for veneering overlay dentures which may flex in function. METHODS: The resins investigated were an acrylic resin, a crown and bridge resin, a urethane dimethacrylate and a hybrid composite resin systems. The first three were bonded via an adhesive primer/opaque system based upon 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride (4-META) and the last via one based on 10-methacryloxyldecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP). Cast alloy beams 30 x 4 x 0.8 mm with 2 mm resin veneers were stored in H2O for three days or three months, and subjected to 1000 thermo-cycles between 4 and 60 degrees C, and/or 5000 flexural cycles to a displacement of 0.1 mm. Three-point bend testing was carried out in an Instron 4505 UTM. The increase in the flexural moduli of the cast beams, due to the addition of the resin spines, together with the displacements and loads at yield were recorded. RESULTS: The adhesive resin systems varied in their abilities to withstand conditioning stresses, this appeared to reflect the rigidity of the resin component as well as the performance of the adhesive bond. CONCLUSIONS: While the composite/MDP system maintained the highest bond strength throughout the conditioning, its low displacement at yield indicates that it may be more suitable for rigid areas of a removable partial denture. Acrylic resin, with its high load and displacement at yield, make it the material of choice for veneering the more flexible saddle areas of partial dentures.

Acrylic Resins↗

Fabrication of a craniofacial implant surgical and treatment planning guide.

A procedure is described to fabricate a surgical guide to assist in the placement of craniofacial implants for prosthetic auricular rehabilitation. An impression is made of the defect, and a wax pattern of the missing ear is completed and evaluated on the patient. The definitive wax prosthesis is processed in acrylic resin. An occlusal maxillary splint is also fabricated. The occlusal splint and the acrylic resin ear are joined together using an extraoral acrylic resin bar. The resulting surgical guide provides proper orientation of the acrylic resin ear while remaining securely attached to the maxillary arch. This surgical guide can also be utilized for pretreatment radiographic examination.

Acrylic Resins↗

Acrylic resin-fiber composite--Part I: The effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance.

This study tested the effect on the fracture resistance of acrylic resin test specimens when different amounts of fibers were incorporated in the resin matrix. The fibers used included glass, carbon, and aramid fibers, with 30 test specimens of each concentration of fibers. Transverse sections of the specimens were studied by scanning electron microscope to establish how the fibers behave in the polymerization process. The results indicated that an increase in the amount of fibers enhanced the fracture resistance of the test specimens (p < 0.001). The SEM micrographs of transverse sections of test polymerized specimens revealed void spaces of different sizes inside the fiber roving.

Analysis of Variance↗

Effect of enzymatic and NaOCl treatments on acrylic roughness and on biofilm accumulation.

As denture cleansers should be able to reduce biofilm accumulation without changing the acrylic resin surface structure, this study evaluated the effect of denture cleansers on surface roughness of acrylic resin and on biofilm accumulation. It was conducted a crossover study of three phases of 4 days each and 13 volunteers wore palatal appliances containing four specimens of acrylic resin of known surface roughness which were extra-orally submitted once a day to three groups of separated treatments: (i) negative control, (ii) enzymatic commercial solution (Ortoform) or (iii) 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The appliances were immersed eight times a day in a 20% sucrose solution to enhance biofilm formation. On morning of the fifth day of each phase, the amount of biofilm formed on the specimens was estimated by the amount of protein extracted with alkali and the surface roughness of the specimens was again measured. New palatal appliances with new specimens were worn by the volunteers in the following phases, but the treatments were changed. The roughness of the resin increased after the treatments (P < 0.05) but the difference among the cleansers was not statistically significant (P = 0.85). The lowest amount of biofilm formed on acrylic resin specimens was found for the treatment with NaOCl (P < 0.05) but the enzymatic product did not differ from the negative control group (P > 0.05). The data suggest that the roughness of acrylic resin was not changed by the cleansers, but the ability to reduce biofilm accumulation depended on the product used.

Acrylic Resins↗

Complications after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim was to retrospectively evaluate the frequencies of different complications, as well as the number of visits to dentists because of such complications, after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 75 patients who had been treated with implant-supported fixed prostheses 3 years earlier. All case records were scrutinized, and notes of complications in association with implants and superstructures were registered. RESULTS: The most common intervention made was occlusal adjustment/selective grinding of the prostheses. Complications in association with both implants and superstructures were fairly common. The most frequent complication was fractures of the acrylic resin matrix, including artificial acrylic resin teeth. Consultations because of periimplant mucosal inflammation were much more common among women compared to men, while complications that could be attributed to heavy loading tended to be more common in men. CONCLUSION: Complications with both implants and superstructures are fairly common after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses. Regular follow-ups to maintain optimal function in these patients are thus mandatory.

Acrylic Resins↗

The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fracture of a repaired denture base often occurs at the junction of the base and repair materials rather than within these materials. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of 4 denture base acrylic resins following the use of 3 chemical solvents and to examine treated acrylic resin surfaces under a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty discs (15 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick) were fabricated for each denture base material (a conventionally molded, heat-polymerized [Meliodent, M], an injection-molded, heat-polymerized [SR-Ivocap, I], and a microwave-polymerized [Acron MC, A]) repaired with an autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Meliodent), for a total of 120 specimens, processed according to manufacturers' instructions, embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and divided into 4 groups of 10. One of the groups served as control and had no surface treatment. In the 3 experimental groups, specimen surfaces were treated with chemical etchants by immersion in acetone (ac) for 30 seconds, in methylene chloride (mc) for 30 seconds, or in MMA (mo) for 180 seconds, respectively. Then autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Meliodent) was placed on the treated surfaces using a brass ring (6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) to confine the material to a standardized dimension. After 24 hours of storage at 37 degrees C, the shear bond strength (MPa) of the specimens was measured in a universal testing machine. A 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test were performed to identify significant differences (alpha=.05). The nature of the failure was noted as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The effect of the chemical treatments on the surface of base resins was examined under an SEM. RESULTS: Chemical treatments increased the bond strength of repair material significantly. Significant differences were found between the control and experimental groups (P<.001). In the control group, M showed the highest (16.7 MPa) bond strength, and A showed the lowest (9.4 MPa). No significant differences were detected between M (18.9 MPa) and A (19.9 MPa) with acetone treatment, or between M (19.3 MPa) and A (20.3 MPa) with methylene chloride treatment. The SEM observations showed that application of chemical etchants produced smoother surfaces than controls. CONCLUSION: Chemical treatment prior to denture base repair showed significant improvement on the bond strength of the base materials. Although the microwave-polymerized acrylic resin, A, showed the lowest shear bond strength compared to the control groups, the highest percentage increase was obtained with A after chemical treatments.

Acetone↗

Effect of tinfoil substitute contamination on adhesion of resin denture tooth to its denture base.

At least one manufacturer claims that contamination of denture teeth with tinfoil substitute during processing is not detrimental. The purpose of this study was to determine whether tinfoil substitute contamination has any significant effect on the bond strength between acrylic resin denture teeth and their processed acrylic resin base. Eighty acrylic resin maxillary central incisors were processed to denture base material. The experimental group had the denture tooth ridgelap area contaminated with tinfoil substitute. The control group was not contaminated. The bond strength of the two groups was tested. The results indicate that contamination with tinfoil substitute significantly reduces the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth bonded to their denture base.

Acrylic Resins↗

The use of a stent-resin-bonded splint combination to stabilize a free gingival autograft.

This article describes the use of a resin-bonded retainer in combination with an acrylic resin stent to stabilize a free gingival graft. This retainer also prevents migration of muscle attachment after surgery to deepen a section of the vestibule where the oral mucosa closely approached the gingival margin. The acrylic resin stent is attached to the resin-bonded retainer by means of an integrally cast metal framework. After surgery, the retainer is attached to the occlusal two thirds of the buccal surfaces of maxillary molar teeth by using the acid-etched resin bonding technique. The stent effectively retains the graft, is simple to fit, and does not cause any permanent damage to the enamel. It has none of the disadvantages of conventional removable acrylic resin stents.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Evaluation of polycaprolaitone custom tray material.

Custom impression trays are necessary for accurate impressions in fixed prosthodontics when using polysulfide impression materials. These custom impression trays are needed to provide for a uniform thickness of impression material to minimize distortion. Custom impression trays have historically been made from acrylic resin. New materials have been developed as alternatives to acrylic resin, and this study evaluates one product currently available that is composed of polycaprolaitone. This study evaluates the modulus of elasticity of polycaprolaitone as compared with acrylic resin, and also evaluates the amount of permanent deformation of the new material when placed under a load. The elastic modulus of polycaprolaitone was tested using three-point bending of specimens placed in a universal mechanical test system. The elastic modulus of the new material was found to be significantly lower than that of acrylic resin. The next test evaluated the amount of permanent deformation of the polycaprolatione material when specimens approximating the shape and size of custom impression trays were placed under a load. These trays were placed in a universal mechanical test system and differing loads were placed on them. Results showed that although the trays deformed at relatively low loads, all deformation was fully recovered within a clinically insignificant period of time (less than 30 seconds). From these experiments it was concluded that although the polycaprolaitone material has a lower modulus of elasticity and will deform under relatively low loads, the material recovers completely, and thus the deformation would not interfere with the clinical performance of polycaprolaitone as a custom tray material.

Dental Impression Technique↗

Bonding of plastic teeth to denture base resins.

This study evaluated the bond strengths of some new and traditional resin denture teeth and denture base resins. It included regular monolithic acrylic resin teeth (Bioform), monolithic acrylic resin-IPN teeth (Bioform IPN), and multilithic acrylic resin-composite resin teeth (Vivosit), with relatively new light-activated resin (Triad), conventional heat-cured resin (Lucitone 199), and autopolymerizing resin (Hygenic) denture base materials. The results of four-point flexure testing showed that the traditional materials gave the highest bond strength values. The autopolymerizing resin systems demonstrated interfacial failure with all resin denture teeth, showing that the common practice of treating teeth with the respective autopolymerizing monomer failed to produce adequate bond strength. Combinations of acrylic resin, IPN, and multilithic denture teeth with light-activated resins gave results calling for improvements in basic bonding system design, since interface debonding was prevalent. No failures occurred between the lap-ridge region of the multilithic tooth system and conventional heat-cured denture base resin.

Acrylic Resins↗