SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “treatment efficacy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,148 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Deucravacitinib 5-Year Safety and Efficacy Results in Plaque Psoriasis: A Phase 3 Open-Label Extension of Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy and for adults with active psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated deucravacitinib safety and efficacy over 5 years in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and long-term extension (LTE) trials in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: PSO-1 and PSO-2 (parent trials) randomized patients 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily. At 52 weeks, patients enrolled in the LTE trial received open-label deucravacitinib. Safety was reported as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years (PY). Clinician- and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed using modified nonresponder imputation in patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib from day 1 (PSO-1/PSO-2) through 5 years. RESULTS: Overall, 1519 patients received one or more deucravacitinib dose; total exposure was 5046.7 PY through data cutoff (September 2, 2024). EAIRs/100 PY were comparable or decreased from the 1-year to 5-year cumulative period for adverse events (AEs) (229.23, 127.40, respectively), serious AEs (5.68, 5.06), discontinuation due to AEs (4.38, 2.09), deaths (0.20, 0.22), serious infections excluding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1.53, 0.94), malignancies (1.02, 0.92), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.30, 0.34), and venous thromboembolism (0.20, 0.06). Clinical outcomes were well-maintained in patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib (n = 513) from 1 through 5 years, including achievement of a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (1 year, 72.1% [95% CI 68.2-76.1]; 5 years, 67.3% [62.0-72.6]) and a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (1 year, 57.5% [53.1-61.9]; 5 years, 52.6% [47.0-58.1]). Dermatology Life Quality Index 0 or 1 was well-maintained from 1 year (52.5% [48.0-57.1]) through 5 years (45.4% [40.0-50.8]). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a consistent safety profile with no new safety signals and durable clinical response through 5 years of treatment with deucravacitinib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03624127, NCT03611751, NCT04036435.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia (ENERGIZE-T): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The absence of disease-modifying therapies for patients with α-thalassaemia and oral disease-modifying therapies for patients with β-thalassaemia has been a substantial unmet need in these patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mitapivat, an oral allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase, in adults with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia. METHODS: ENERGIZE-T is a global, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted across 19 countries in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East. Patients aged 18 years or older with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia were randomly allocated (2:1) with a central interactive response technology system, stratified by geographical region and thalassaemia genotype, to receive 100 mg mitapivat or placebo orally twice a day for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was transfusion reduction response (TRR), defined as a reduction of at least 50% in transfused red blood cell units with a reduction of at least two units in any consecutive 12-week period until week 48 compared with baseline. Efficacy was analysed in the full analysis set, comprising all randomly allocated patients. Type, severity, and relationship of adverse events and serious adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04770779) and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2021 and May 2, 2023, 305 patients were screened, of whom 258 were randomly allocated (median age 33·5 years [IQR 27·0-44·0]; 136 [53%] female and 122 [47%] male participants). Of 258 patients allocated, 238 (92%) completed the double-blind treatment period. All patients were required to have a safety follow-up approximately 4 weeks after the final dose of study drug, regardless of completion of the double-blind period or continuation into the open-label extension period. In the full analysis set, TRRs occurred in 52 (30%) of 171 patients in the mitapivat group and 11 (13%) of 87 in the placebo group (adjusted difference 18 percentage points [95% CI 8-27]; two-sided p=0·0003). The safety analysis set comprised 172 patients in the mitapivat group (including one patient allocated to the placebo group who received one dose of mitapivat in error) and 85 in the placebo group. Adverse events were reported in 155 (90%) patients treated with mitapivat and 71 (84%) treated with placebo; the most common events with mitapivat were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, initial insomnia, diarrhoea, and fatigue. Serious adverse events were reported in 19 (11%) patients treated with mitapivat and 13 (15%) treated with placebo. Ten (6%) patients who received mitapivat and one (1%) who received placebo discontinued study treatment due to adverse events. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Mitapivat significantly reduced the transfusion burden and was generally well tolerated, showing a favourable benefit-risk profile. These findings support mitapivat as the first oral disease-modifying therapy for adults with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia, providing a new treatment option to reduce transfusion burden in this patient population. FUNDING: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of alixorexton, a selective orexin 2 receptor agonist for narcolepsy type 1 (Vibrance-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical potential of orexin 2 receptor (OX2R) agonism for improving measures of wakefulness and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy type 1 has been described in a phase 2 study. Here, we aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of alixorexton, another oral OX2R agonist, in narcolepsy type 1. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, adult participants (aged 18-70 years) with narcolepsy type 1 were recruited from 46 hospitals and private research centres across the USA, Europe, and Australia. Participants were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) in blocks of four via an interactive response technology system stratified by region and baseline weekly cataplexy rate (WCR) to receive 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg tablets of alixorexton or placebo once daily for 6 weeks, followed by an optional 7-week open-label extension. Participants had narcolepsy type 1, diagnosed per the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition, and confirmed by overnight polysomnography and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test or cerebrospinal hypocretin-1 concentrations. The sponsor, assessors, investigators, and participants were masked during the randomised double-blind treatment period. Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in mean sleep latency (MSL) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06358950) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 24, 2024, and May 5, 2025, 153 individuals were screened and 92 participants were randomly assigned to receive alixorexton 4 mg (n=23), 6 mg (n=22), 8 mg (n=24), or placebo (n=23). Mean age was 33·5 years (SD 12·1), 57 (62%) were women, and 35 (38%) were men. At week 6, the observed MSL on the MWT was 2·3 min (SD 2·7) for placebo, 24·0 min (8·7) for alixorexton 4 mg, 25·9 min (9·4) for 6 mg, and 28·2 min (11·4) for 8 mg. Alixorexton improved MSL on the MWT, with a least-squares mean placebo-corrected change from baseline of 22·2 min (95% CI 17·2-27·2) for alixorexton 4 mg, 24·1 min (19·0-29·1) for 6 mg, and 26·0 min (21·0-31·0) for 8 mg (adjusted p=0·0099 for 4 mg, adjusted p<0·0001 for 6 mg and 8 mg). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in at least 5% of participants given alixorexton and more frequently than those given placebo up to week 6 were pollakiuria (38 [55%]), insomnia (19 [28%]), salivary hypersecretion (17 [25%]), micturition urgency (ten [14%]), blurred vision (ten [14%]), and hyperhidrosis (five [7%]). INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2 trial, once-daily oral alixorexton provided clinically meaningful improvements at 6 weeks for participants with narcolepsy type 1, including in wakefulness, excessive daytime sleepiness, and cataplexy. The treatment was generally well tolerated, with adverse events consistent with the known on-target effects of OX2R agonists. Together, these findings support the further phase 3 evaluation of alixorexton as a potential therapeutic option for people with narcolepsy type 1. FUNDING: Alkermes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy, acceptability, and related outcomes of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: a systematic review and dose-related network meta-analysis across different age groups.

BACKGROUND: Acute bipolar mania carries negative social and economic consequences. We investigated the comparative efficacy/response/acceptability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania, considering dose effects across different age groups. METHODS: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions with one another or placebo in acute bipolar mania patients, indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus (from inception through 2025.12.24). Co-primary outcomes were change in manic symptoms/response/and acceptability. Tolerability/remission and rate of adverse events were secondary outcomes. Confidence-In-Network-Meta-Analysis was likewise appraised. RESULTS: 113 RCTs, encompassing 49 distinct treatment combinations, included 20,666 participants. Sensitivity analysis retaining only low-risk-of-bias studies and excluding outliers for possible effect modifiers indicated that risperidone 3 mg/day(SMD = -7.57;95%C.I. = -8.25;-5.85); tamoxifen 160 mg/day(SMD = -1.73;95%C.I. = -2.32;-1.13); rivastigmine 3 mg/day(SMD = -1.13;95%C.I. = -1.06;-0.58); haloperidol 30 mg/day(SMD = -0.96;95%C.I. = -1.25;-0.75); valproate 750 mg/day(SMD = -0.76;95%C.I. = -1.48;-0.58); tamoxifen 40 mg/day(SMD = -0.75;95%C.I. = -1.41;-0.59); celecoxib 400 mg/day(SMD = -0.74;95%C.I. = -1.20;-0.38); paliperidone extended-release 12 mg/day(SMD = -0.62; 95%C.I. = -0.91;-0.32); olanzapine 15 mg/day(SMD = -0.59;95%C.I. = -0.60;-0.38); olanzapine 20 mg/day(SMD = -0.52;95%C.I. = -0.66;-0.38); risperidone 4 mg/day(SMD = -0.53;95%C.I. = -0.76;-0.29); allopurinol 600 mg/day(SMD = -0.54;95%C.I. = -0.67;-0.22); cariprazine 12 mg/day(SMD = -0.49;95%C.I. = -0.66;-0.33); risperidone 4.2 mg/day(SMD = -0.46;95%C.I. = -0.75;-0.17); lithium 1500 mg/day(SMD = -0.42;95%C.I. = -0.57;-0.28); ziprasidone 160 mg/day(SMD = -0.49;95%C.I. = -0.68;-0.31); asenapine 20 mg/day(SMD = -0.38;95%C.I. = -0.53;-0.22); haloperidol 8 mg/day(SMD = -0.34;95%C.I. = -0.63;-0.05); aripiprazole 15 mg/day(SMD = -0.33;95%C.I. = -0.61;-0.06) outperformed placebo. Ziprasidone 160 mg/day, celecoxib 200 mg/day, asenapine 20 mg/day, and asenapine 10 mg/day proved more efficacious than placebo in children. No statistically significant differences were reported between treatments and placebo for response/remission/acceptability/tolerability, and manic/hypomanic switch. A meta-regression of efficacy effect sizes against the adapted AMSTAR-Plus content scores showed that larger SMDs were associated with lower AMSTAR scores, indicating lower study quality, warranting further caution for such large efficacy estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous NMAs and current guidelines, expanding the current knowledge base while concurrently appraising different drugs, doses, and age groups.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Perioperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and posterior transversus abdominis plane block in paediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty: A prospective randomised trial.

PURPOSE: Open pyeloplasty in the paediatric population involves extensive tissue dissection and manipulation, resulting in significant postoperative pain. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have emerged as an important component of multimodal analgesia in abdominal surgeries. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block (ESP) and posterior transversus abdominis plane (pTAP) block in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. METHODS: It is a prospective, randomised, double-blind study conducted at a single paediatric centre in a tertiary care hospital in Asia from January 2022 to June 2023. 40 ASA I-II children were randomised to receive either the ESP block (Group E) or the pTAP block (Group T). Both groups received 0.4 ml/kg, 0.2% ropivacaine with 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine. Children with an allergy to local anaesthetics, cardiac, renal or hepatic dysfunction and local site infection were excluded. The primary outcome was cumulative 24 h postoperative acetaminophen consumption. Secondary outcomes included the effects on intraoperative hemodynamics, perioperative opioid consumption, FLACC and Watcha scores, time to first rescue analgesia, and any block-related complications. RESULTS: Weight-normalised 24 h postoperative acetaminophen consumption was significantly lower in the ESP group (13.5 ± 4.7 mg/kg) compared to the pTAP group (25.4 ± 8.3 mg/kg), with a mean difference of -12 mg/kg (p < 0.001, 95%CI -16 to -7.6). The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the ESP group (18 h [95% CI, 18-24]) than in the TAP group (9 h [95% CI, 6-12]), p < 0.001. Although FLACC scores were significantly lower in the ESP group at 30 min and 12 h postoperatively, the overall longitudinal analysis using a linear mixed-effects model showed no significant difference in the trend of FLACC scores over time between the two groups. There were no block-related complications. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides better, longer-lasting analgesia than posterior TAP block in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. Hence, it may serve as an effective component of multimodal pain management in paediatric open pyeloplasty. CTRI REGISTRATION (CTRI/2022/04/041876) DATED 13/04/2022): https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php?trialid=67747&EncHid=42257.14515&modid=1&compid=19.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of dapagliflozin on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a pre-specified single-arm analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the association of dapagliflozin therapy with changes in hepatic steatosis and non-invasive fibrosis surrogate markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) over 12 months. METHODS: This is a pre-specified single-arm analysis from a randomised, open-label, parallel-group trial. Of 54 participants randomised to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily, 50 (92.6%) completed the 12-month follow-up and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months included transient elastography (CAP and LSM), ultrasonography, and biochemical tests. Primary endpoints were changes in hepatic steatosis (CAP) and non-invasive fibrosis surrogates (LSM). RESULTS: Significant reductions were observed in hepatic steatosis (CAP: 316.7 to 245.7 dB/m; mean change - 71.02 dB/m, 95% CI: -63.4 to - 78.6; p < 0.001) and in liver stiffness as a non-invasive fibrosis surrogate (LSM: 8.59 to 7.28 kPa; mean change - 1.31 kPa, 95% CI: -0.92 to - 1.70; p < 0.001). Improvements were also observed in glycaemic control, body weight, lipid profile, liver enzymes, ultrasonographic steatosis grading, and serum fibrosis markers. Genitourinary infections were the most frequently reported adverse events (32%); no serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin was associated with significant improvements in hepatic steatosis, non-invasive fibrosis surrogate markers, metabolic parameters, and liver function in T2DM patients with MASLD over 12 months. These findings provide region-specific evidence for an Indian population and support further controlled investigation. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the pre-specified single-arm design of this analysis, the open-label methodology, relatively small sample size, and the absence of liver biopsy confirmation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-Low Starting Dose Febuxostat Titration in Male Patients With Primary Gout.

BACKGROUND: Since gout is a common metabolic arthritis caused by urate crystal deposition, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is clearly indicated, but the initiation of ULT frequently causes paradoxical acute flares that in turn impair patient adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of an ultra-low-dose initiation strategy for febuxostat (10 mg/day) compared to the standard starting dose (20 mg/day) in reducing initiation-related flares while maintaining long-term urate control. METHODS: 120 male patients with primary gout presenting with acute arthritis were randomly assigned to initiate febuxostat at 10 mg/day (Group A) or 20 mg/day (Group B), with protocol-mandated biweekly titration. The primary outcomes were gout flare frequency over 24 weeks (assessed using Poisson regression), serum uric acid (SUA) target attainment, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Although both groups achieved comparable target SUA levels by week 24, Group A demonstrated a significantly lower overall flare incidence (36.7% vs. 70.0%; p < 0.001), along with a greater percentage of flare-free patients (70.0% vs. 46.7%; p = 0.016). Multivariable Poisson regression revealed that Group B had an approximately twofold higher risk of flares compared to Group A (Incidence Rate Ratio = 1.95; p = 0.012), with obese patients deriving the most pronounced benefit from the ultra-low-dose approach. To avert one additional flare, the calculated number needed to treat was 4.3. Additionally, the occurrence of clinically significant liver injury (ALT/AST > 3× ULN) was low in both groups, with 3.3% in Group A and 1.7% in Group B. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that LDL-C is an independent predictor of ALT (β = 12.90, p = 0.009), while febuxostat dosage was not linked to hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Initiating febuxostat at a dose of 10 mg/day with gradual titration demonstrates a superior safety profile by effectively reducing early acute flares without compromising long-term urate control, which is particularly advantageous for high-risk cohorts, including obese patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3b trial.

BACKGROUND: Semaglutide 2·4 mg is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that reduces bodyweight, and provides other cardiometabolic benefits, among people with a BMI at least 30 kg/m2 or at least 27 kg/m2 and with weight-related comorbidities. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of semaglutide 2·4 mg in adults from mainland China and Taiwan with overweight or obesity according to locally defined, BMI thresholds. METHODS: This completed randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group, phase 3b trial (STEP 12) was conducted at 19 sites across mainland China and Taiwan. Adults with a BMI of 24-<28 kg/m2 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, or a BMI of 28-<30 kg/m2, with or without type 2 diabetes, were randomly assigned (2:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention, for 44 weeks. Randomisation was performed by the study sponsor using the Randomisation Trial Supplies Management System. Coprimary endpoints were percentage change in bodyweight and the proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction. Safety was analysed descriptively in all participants who received the trial intervention. Missing data at week 44 were imputed with washout multiple imputation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06041217, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 15, 2023, and May 7, 2025, of 254 screened participants, 161 (66·5%) of 242 participants were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2·4 mg and 81 (33·5%) to placebo; 121 (50·0%) participants were female, and 47 (19·4%) participants had type 2 diabetes. Bodyweight reduction was greater with semaglutide versus placebo (-12·1% [SE 0·6] vs -2·2% [0·8]; estimated treatment difference -9·9 percentage points [95% CI -11·8 to -8·0]; p<0·0001), with a greater proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction (80·5% vs 24·4%; odds ratio [OR] 14·8 [95% CI 7·4 to 29·6]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 141 (87·6%) of 161 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group and 61 (75·3%) of 81 participants in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. INTERPRETATION: Semaglutide 2·4 mg provided a superior reduction in bodyweight versus placebo in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity. The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of semaglutide. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. TRANSLATION: For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction: Are the benefits limited to patients with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recently, studies have focused on evaluating the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in this scenario. Objectives We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors vs standard care. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing patients with acute myocardial infarction using iSGLT2 inhibitors and standard care. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (v 4.3.2) and a random-effects model was employed for all outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 31,378 patients were included, with 10,897 (34.7%) assigned to the SGLT2 inhibitor group. Among these studies, three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There was a significant difference in reduction of HF readmissions (OR 0.61; p < 0.01), all-cause mortality (OR 0.62; p < 0.01;) and stroke (OR 0.67; p < 0.01;). However, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular death, rehospitalization for any cause and recurrence of acute MI. Meta regression and subgroup analysis showed a trend toward better outcomes in the diabetic and non-STEMI population. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower HF rehospitalization, stroke, and all-cause mortality after acute MI, mainly in observational studies. Benefits appeared greater in diabetic and non-STEMI patients. Dedicated RCTs focusing on diabetic, particularly non-STEMI, populations are needed to confirm these findings. KEY POINTS: What is already known on this topic: SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, their role in the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting remains uncertain, particularly regarding post-AMI outcomes such as heart failure readmissions, mortality, and recurrent ischemic events, with current evidence derived from heterogeneous and predominantly observational studies. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This meta-analysis, including over 31,000 patients, suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with reductions in heart failure readmissions, all-cause mortality, and stroke following AMI. These associations were more consistently observed in patients with type 2 diabetes and in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) populations. However, randomized controlled trials showed neutral results, and the observed benefits were mainly driven by observational studies. Meaning: These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. While SGLT2 inhibitors may represent a potential therapeutic strategy in selected post-AMI populations, particularly patients with diabetes and NSTEMI, current evidence does not support routine early in-hospital initiation. Dedicated randomized trials specifically enrolling diabetic post-AMI patients are required to clarify optimal timing and clinical benefit.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Feasibility and Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Japanese Patients With Relapsed/Refractory ALK-Aberrant Neuroblastoma.

Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, was administered off-label to five heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory ALK-aberrant neuroblastoma. ALK alterations included F1174L, R1275Q, BEND5::ALK fusion, and ALK amplification; three patients had MYCN amplification. Best responses were three partial responses and two disease progressions. The longest progression-free survival (6.7 months) occurred in a patient with F1174L and non-amplified MYCN, whereas rapid progression was observed in two MYCN-amplified cases. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated with manageable adverse events. These findings suggest that lorlatinib is a feasible therapeutic option in ALK-aberrant neuroblastoma and that clinical heterogeneity in treatment response warrants further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine compared to peripheral regional analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Following elective total hip arthroplasty, pain continues to be a significant problem. Intrathecal morphine or peripheral regional analgesia, that is local infiltration analgesia or peripheral nerve block, are common analgesic modalities, but it is still not known which is superior. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: The following electronic databases were searched from inception to 24 March 2026: CENTRAL; Ovid Embase; Ovid MEDLINE; Scopus; and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared intrathecal morphine to peripheral regional analgesia in patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: Eight trials and 471 patients were included. The peripheral regional analgesia was peripheral nerve block in six trials and local infiltration analgesia in two trials. No difference was demonstrated between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to the first coprimary outcome, the pain score at rest at 24 h. The quality of evidence was moderate. Intrathecal morphine was found to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia with respect to the second coprimary outcome, the cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h. Mean difference (95% CI) was 11.38 mg (4.31-18.45; P  = 0.002, I2  = 81%). The quality of evidence was low. Intrathecal morphine was revealed to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia at 8-12 h for the pain score at rest, 1.24 (0.60-1.88); P  = 0.0001, I2  = 68%; pain score on movement, 1.15 (0.12-2.17), P  = 0.03, I2  = 65%; but the rate of in hospital pruritus was reduced with peripheral regional analgesia, 0.31 (0.17-0.58), P  = 0.0002, I2  = 0%. No differences in functional status were shown. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to pain score at rest at 24 h. Intrathecal morphine may lead to a favourable effect on some but not all analgesic indices compared to peripheral regional analgesia in elective total hip arthroplasty. The quality of evidence for these positive effects was low. Intrathecal morphine reduced the systemic opioid consumption, but is not in itself an opioid free strategy. This notion is supported by the increased incidence of in hospital pruritus with intrathecal morphine. The quality of evidence for this was high. In view of the quality of evidence, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to substantiate these results.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RIPK1 inhibitor, SAR443820, in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (HIMALAYA): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: RIPK1, a protein regulating inflammatory signalling and cell death, is implicated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathophysiology. SAR443820 is a selective, oral, CNS-penetrant, reversible RIPK1 inhibitor. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SAR443820 in participants with ALS. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at 63 clinical sites in 13 countries (Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and the USA). Adults (aged 18-80 years) with a diagnosis of possible ALS, clinically probable ALS, clinically probable laboratory-supported ALS, or clinically definite ALS, in accordance with the revised El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria, were randomly assigned (2:1) by use of a stratified block design (blocks of three) to receive either 20 mg SAR443820 orally twice per day or matching placebo in the 24-week double-blind period. Randomisation was done centrally using interactive response technology and stratified by geographical region of trial site, region of ALS onset, use of riluzole, use of edaravone, and use of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol. Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors were masked to trial intervention. The primary outcome was a change in ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 24 and was calculated for all participants who had an ALSFRS-R total score available at baseline and at week 24. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned participants receiving one dose or more of trial intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05237284) and was terminated early. FINDINGS: Between April 13, 2022, and July 17, 2023, 397 participants were screened and 305 randomly assigned to SAR443820 (n=203) or placebo (n=102); six were excluded from the primary analysis due to missing baseline ALSFRS-R values. Mean age was 56·9 years (SD 11·5); 183 (60%) participants were male and 122 (40%) were female. Least squares mean change in ALSFRS-R from baseline to week 24 was -6·73 (95% CI -7·48 to -5·98) for SAR443820 group (n=169) and -6·32 (-7·36 to -5·27) for placebo group (n=87). There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups (least squares mean difference -0·41 [95% CI -1·71 to 0·88]). Participants in the SAR443820 group had higher incidence of adverse events (171 [85%] of 202 vs placebo 80 [78%] of 102) and treatment discontinuations (28 [14%] of 202 vs placebo five [5%] of 102), with elevated hepatic enzymes being the most common cause. Nine deaths occurred in the double-blind period (seven [3%] of 202 in the SAR443820 group and two [2%] of 102 in the placebo group); none was attributed to SAR443820. INTERPRETATION: SAR443820 did not show clinical benefit and was associated with higher hepatic enzyme increase, indicating that further clinical development of SAR443820 in ALS is not warranted. FUNDING: Sanofi.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of lavender oil preparation silexan on different symptoms of major depression - results from a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by depressed mood, anhedonia, and loss of energy, which can be accompanied by associated symptoms and co-morbidities. Psychiatric scales such as the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) must account for the complex nature of depression. METHODS: The MADRS total score change between baseline and week 8 was the primary outcome measure in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial investigating the antidepressant efficacy of 8 weeks' treatment with silexan compared to sertraline and placebo in patients with mild or moderate MDD. We report on a pre-planned, exploratory analysis of the individual MADRS items. Treatment effects were assessed using analyses of covariance with baseline adjustment, based on an estimand strategy. RESULTS: 498 subjects (silexan 170, sertraline 171, placebo 157) were treated and analyzed. After 8 weeks, silexan was superior to placebo for 5 out of the 9 MADRS items analyzed ("apparent sadness", "reported sadness", "reduced appetite", "concentration difficulties", "lassitude"; P < .05) and showed clinically important adjusted mean value differences >0.2 points for 7 out of the 9 items. Item-level results for silexan and sertraline were mainly comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Silexan had a strong over-all antidepressant effect, with the most pronounced improvements affecting the cardinal symptoms of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT2020-000688-22 first entered on 12/08/2020. Significance statement Patients with depressive disorders can show many different symptoms. To better characterize the clinical action of an antidepressant, it is therefore important to analyze not only the overall value of a depression scale but also the individual items that describe these symptoms. Silexan is a preparation from lavender oil whose antidepressant effect has been proven in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week study in patients with mild or moderate major depressive disorder. Based on the individual items of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale that was used as the main outcome for efficacy, we found in an exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis that silexan had a rather broad antidepressant effect in the participants of our study, with potentially clinically meaningful advantages over placebo for 7 out of the 9 individual items investigated. This applied in particular to the main symptoms of depression, namely sadness and lassitude. Our single-item analysis thus helps to understand the antidepressant effects of silexan in more detail. Significant outcomes In patients with mild to moderate major depressive disorder, lavender oil preparation silexan has a clinical profile similar to that of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor sertraline based on an item-level analysis of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Silexan has a significant antidepressant effect that includes an alleviation of depressed mood, anhedonia, and loss of energy, the cardinal symptoms of depression. The broad improvement of symptoms of depression could not be explained by the proven anxiolytic efficacy silexan alone but indicates an independent, direct antidepressant effect. The present item-level analysis provides valuable and detailed additional insights into the therapeutic profiles of silexan and sertraline and may help clinicians to tailor antidepressant treatment to the specific symptoms of a patient. Limitations For item-level analyses of the MADRS, no validated thresholds for the assessment of the clinical importance of changes over time have been defined, taking into account that different items may have different thresholds. Even though our analyses were pre-defined, they were exploratory and did not include studywise type I error level control. Their generalizability beyond the study population is therefore limited.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy (VBSO) versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is an established treatment for complex cervical myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), yet it carries risks of dural injury and graft-related failure. Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) is a novel technique that avoids direct OPLL manipulation by translating the vertebral body anteriorly to enlarge the spinal canal. Although early studies suggest VBSO may reduce complications, evidence remains limited to retrospective cohorts from the technique's developers, with no high-level synthesis directly comparing it to ACCF. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes, complications, and radiographic parameters between VBSO and ACCF, while critically evaluating the certainty of the evidence and its generalizability. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (through June 2025) identified four retrospective cohort studies (449 patients; VBSO n = 209, ACCF n = 240). A critical limitation of the included evidence is that all studies originated from a single institution (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) with overlapping enrollment periods (2006-2020), increasing the risk of duplicate patient cohorts. Furthermore, the first author (D.-H. Lee) is the same across all included studies, introducing substantial surgeon-expertise bias. Outcomes included neurological recovery, functional outcomes, complications, and radiographic parameters. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Neurological recovery and functional outcomes were comparable between groups. ACCF showed slightly higher postoperative JOA scores (MD -0.59, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.22; p < 0.01), though the clinical relevance is uncertain. VBSO was associated with reduced risks of graft subsidence (RR 0.23; p < 0.01), pseudarthrosis (RR 0.25; p < 0.01), revision surgery (RR 0.17; p < 0.01), and neurological deterioration (RR 0.17; p = 0.02). CSF leakage appeared to be less frequent with VBSO, but the difference was not statistically significant. VBSO was also associated with greater postoperative cervical lordosis and shorter hospital stays. However, these findings must be interpreted with extreme caution: leave-one-out sensitivity analyses revealed that the results for postoperative JOA score, neurological deterioration, and pseudarthrosis were fragile and driven by a single large study, meaning these apparent advantages may not be robust. In addition, GRADE assessment revealed very low certainty across all assessed outcomes. Given the very low certainty of evidence, the preliminary nature of the available data, the fragility of several key findings, and the critical limitations of the underlying studies (single institution, overlapping patient cohorts, developer bias, and systematic imbalance in follow-up duration), the observed differences should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. VBSO should not be considered a proven superior alternative to ACCF based on the current evidence. Prospective, multicenter, international studies with balanced follow-up durations conducted by independent surgical teams are required before broader adoption can be recommended.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the most widely used analgesics in pediatric practice for the management of acute mild-to-moderate pain. Despite their widespread use, the comparative analgesic efficacy of these two agents in children remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing evidence largely derived from heterogeneous clinical settings and small individual trials. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in pediatric populations with acute mild-to-moderate pain. A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2026 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 reporting guideline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with acetaminophen in children and adolescents (defined as individuals aged 0 to < 18 years) with acute pain, reporting at least one extractable efficacy outcome. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects models; dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Eight randomized controlled trials enrolling 1325 participants were included. Three pediatric trials contributed to the primary continuous pain outcome meta-analysis (n = 196 analyzable participants), yielding a pooled SMD of - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.57 to 0.00; p = 0.052; I2 = 0%), indicating a small effect favoring ibuprofen that did not reach conventional statistical significance. Given the small number of contributing studies (k = 3), the I2 statistic should be interpreted with caution as it has limited power to detect heterogeneity in this context. For the dichotomous pain freedom outcome (2 trials, n = 114), no significant difference was observed (pooled RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-1.99; p = 0.93; I2 = 0%). A prespecified sensitivity analysis including an adult soft-tissue injury trial attenuated the pooled effect toward the null (SMD - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.38 to 0.09; p = 0.23; I2 = 36.6%). Narrative synthesis of additional studies generally demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy between the two agents across postoperative and outpatient pediatric settings. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low for both primary outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials does not demonstrate a superiority of ibuprofen over acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in children. Both agents appear to provide clinically meaningful analgesia across heterogeneous pediatric pain settings. The clinical choice between agents should be guided by individual patient factors, including contraindications to NSAIDs, the inflammatory nature of the pain etiology, and patient-specific characteristics. The low certainty of evidence underscores the need for adequately powered, methodologically rigorous trials to definitively establish the comparative efficacy of these two analgesics in the pediatric population. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the two most widely used non-opioid analgesics for acute mild-to-moderate pain in children, and both are recommended as first-line agents by major international guidelines. • Prior meta-analyses in mixed pediatric-adult populations have suggested a modest analgesic advantage of ibuprofen over acetaminophen, but pediatric-specific evidence has remained limited and methodologically heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: • This systematic review and meta-analysis, restricted to randomized controlled trials in pediatric populations, found that ibuprofen showed a small effect favoring pain reduction compared with acetaminophen (SMD - 0.28, p = 0.052), although this did not reach conventional statistical significance. • The analgesic advantage of ibuprofen may be more pronounced in pain etiologies with a significant inflammatory component (e.g., fractures). At the same time, both agents appear broadly equivalent in most other acute pediatric pain settings, supporting individualized analgesic selection based on clinical context and patient-specific factors.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

[Comparative analysis of comprehensive treatment outcomes in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis with the addition of the multicomponent complex AndrOPREN].

INTRODUCTION: Type II chronic bacterial prostatitis is characterized by persistent infection, insufficient efficacy of standard therapy, and a high recurrence rate, which necessitates the search for additional treatment options. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding the multicomponent complex AndrOPREN to comprehensive therapy for type II chronic bacterial prostatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, comparative, randomized study included 233 patients allocated to the main group (n=126) and the control group (n=107). In both groups, patients received standard therapy; men in the main group additionally received the multi-ingredient complex AndrOPREN at a dose of two capsules of No. 1 and two capsules of No. 2 daily for 1-2 months. The follow-up period was 60 days. Changes in symptoms according to the IPSS and QoL scores, urinalysis parameters, microscopy findings of expressed prostatic secretions, pathogen eradication, and biochemical safety parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Improvement was observed in both groups and was more pronounced in the main group. By day 14, the median IPSS score was 14.0 [12.0; 16.0] vs. 18.0 [15.0; 20.0] in the control group (p<0.001); by day 60, the corresponding values were 7.0 [5.0; 9.0] and 11.0 [9.0; 13.0] (p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the QoL score was 2.0 [1.0; 2.0] and 3.0 [2.0; 3.0], respectively. No microbial growth was detected in 91.2% and 80.4% of patients, respectively (p=0.026); Escherichia coli eradication was achieved in 91.7% and 76.9%, respectively. No biochemical changes indicative of nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity were detected. DISCUSSION: The addition of the multicomponent complex AndrOPREN was associated with more rapid symptom resolution, a reduction in inflammatory changes, restoration of the secretory function of the prostate, and greater microbiological efficacy. CONCLUSION: The addition of the multicomponent complex AndrOPREN to comprehensive therapy for type II chronic bacterial prostatitis improves treatment efficacy while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Impact of Baseline Polyneuropathy Severity on Eplontersen Efficacy in the NEURO-TTRansform Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the NEURO-TTRansform clinical trial (NCT04136184), eplontersen improved neuropathy impairment and quality of life (QoL) through Week 66 versus the NEURO-TTR historical placebo in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN). This analysis assessed the impact of baseline ATTRv-PN severity on eplontersen response in patients from NEURO-TTRansform. METHODS: This post hoc analysis grouped patients into tertiles by baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS): T1 (least baseline impairment: 3.5 to < 27.5; n = 67), T2 (27.5 to < 55.0; n = 67), and T3 (55.0 to < 127.8; n = 66). Outcomes assessed were neuropathy impairment (modified NIS+7 [mNIS+7] and NIS, Neuropathy Symptom and Change, Polyneuropathy Disability), QoL (Norfolk QoL-Diabetic Neuropathy), physical functioning (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary), nutritional status (modified body mass index), and serum transthyretin levels; these were compared with NEURO-TTR historical placebo. Autonomic dysfunction (Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31), disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale), and walking speed (10-Meter Walk Test) were also assessed. Final assessments were carried out following 65/66 or 81/85 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Mean mNIS+7 composite scores were maintained over 85 weeks with eplontersen (changes from baseline of -4.5 [T1], -1.3 [T2], and -2.6 [T3] points). Other disease parameter scores were similarly maintained or improved with eplontersen. Patients receiving placebo experienced disease worsening across outcomes. T1 mean disease scores were typically better than in T2 and T3. INTERPRETATION: Consistent, sustained benefits of eplontersen were observed regardless of baseline ATTRv-PN severity. These findings strengthen the importance of early treatment initiation for patients with ATTRv-PN across the disease spectrum.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Reduces the Need for Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia.

Chronic liver disease (CLD)-related thrombocytopenia can limit the feasibility of invasive procedures. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) has demonstrated a favorable safety profile without hepatotoxicity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rhTPO in patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia who were undergoing elective invasive procedures. In this multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 120 adult Chinese patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109/L) received rhTPO (n = 80) or placebo (n = 40) once daily for up to 5 or 7 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L from 24 h before invasive procedure to 7 days post-procedure, without requiring emergency bleeding management. The primary endpoint was achieved by 85.0% of patients in the rhTPO group versus 12.5% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Preoperatively, platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L were achieved in 92.5% and 20.0% of patients in the rhTPO and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Platelet transfusion was avoided in 92.5% of rhTPO-treated patients versus 25.0% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.0001). The median duration of platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L was significantly longer with rhTPO than with placebo (21.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.0007). Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 12.5% of patients in both the rhTPO and placebo groups. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Overall, rhTPO was effective and well tolerated in patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia and may represent a viable therapeutic option for those undergoing elective invasive procedures. Trial Registration: www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn: number CTR20230919.

Humans↗