Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Virology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

A short history of plant virology. III. The thirties.

The Thirties testified on the outstanding development of plant virology: the new discoveries formalized the concept of virus on a physicochemical background. Plant viruses, which had received their own taxonomical position at the end of the Twenties, were no longer considered as simple "infective pathogens" as their size, shape and chemical nature were determined, particularly for one of them--tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). This paramount contribution was achieved as a consequence of a functional interaction between biology on one side, and chemistry and physics on the other side, from the development of which molecular biology was born. The chemical characterization of TMV developed from the first determination of nitrogen presence in purified virus, performed by Carl Vinson, through the identification of TMV as Wendell Stanley's infective, autoreplicative protein macromolecule, to the final discovery of its nucleoprotein nature by the British group of Frederick Bawden. Thorough analytical techniques--in particular electron microscopy--led to disclose the exact shape and size of TMV particle. These discoveries, that opened a new era of virology, were corroborated by new knowledge that, although less explosive, can be considered of great importance for the development of plant virology. The methodologies to estimate viral activity; the study of the relationships between viruses and insect vectors; the studies on virus spread within plants; the identification of non-sterile type of resistance and of correlation between single plant genes and viral pathogenesis benefited plant virology of a set of knowledge that, together with the discoveries on the physico-chemical properties of TMV, raised plant virology from a secondary branch of plant pathology to a new independent science by itself.

History, 20th Century↗

A history of plant virology. Mendelian genetics and resistance of plants to viruses.

Virology was borne at the end of the nineteenth century, some years before the re-discovery of the so-called "Mendel's Laws". The rapid development of genetics was helpful to horticulturists and plant pathologists to produce hybrids of important cropping species resistant to several virus diseases. The concepts of Mendelian genetics were applied to plant virology by Francis Oliver Holmes, an American scientist who must be considered a pioneer in several fields of modern plant virology. During the Thirties, Holmes studied in particular the hypersensitive response of solanaceous plants to TMV and discovered the N dominant gene of tobacco hypersensitive to this virus. After the Second World War, the theoretic and practical support given by geneticists assisted plant virologists in better understanding the mechanism of inheritance of the character "resistance". The major problems posed by breeding for plant resistance were detected and critically discussed in several reviews published between the Fifties and the Sixties. These results, together with the discovery of the genetic functions of RNA virus raised interest on the possible relations between viral and plant genes. This fundamental subject saw the entry into the virological scene of molecular genetics, and in 1970 the Russian virologist Joseph Atabekov introduced host specificity to viruses as a central point of plant virology. From the mid 1980s, this point attracted the interest of several virologists, and many results led to several theoretic models of genetic interactions between plant and virus products. In the last fifteen years, the introduction of transgenic plants has given a remarkable contribution to the question of host specificity, which, however, still awaits a general explanation.

Botany↗

Changes over time in risk of initial virological failure of combination antiretroviral therapy: a multicohort analysis, 1996 to 2002.

BACKGROUND: Triple-combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) for human immunodeficiency virus infection has been in use for almost a decade, but the extent to which treatment success has changed is uncertain. We examined risk of initial virological failure of CART according to the year of starting therapy. METHODS: We included subjects from 5 complete clinic cohorts in Europe and Canada who started CART without previous antiretroviral therapy from 1996 to 2002 with 1 or more pre-CART viral load (VL) measurement and CD4 count. Based on the first VL measurement from 6 to 12 months after CART initiation, virological failure was defined as a VL of more than 500 copies/mL. We used the following 3 inclusion strategies: (1) including all subjects, with missing VL measurement counted as virological failure (n = 3825; strategy A); (2) including all subjects with VL measurement (n = 3120; strategy B); and (3) including all subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy at VL measurement (n = 2890; strategy C). RESULTS: From 1996 to 2002, risk of virological failure fell from 38.9% to 24.8% for strategy A, 28.4% to 12.0% for strategy B, and 22.8% to 8.2% for strategy C. Estimated relative reductions in risk (95% confidence interval) over the 7-year period, adjusted for cohort, demographic factors, pre-CART VL and CD4 count, and previous AIDS, were 48% (39%-56%), 64% (53%-73%), and 79% (69%-85%) for strategies A, B, and C, respectively. Reductions in risk were greatest from 1996 to 1999, with weaker trends subsequently. Trends remained but were attenuated after further adjustment for the starting regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 7-year period of CART use in clinical practice, risk of initial virological failure of treatment has halved at least. These data suggest the trend is due to improvements in CART regimens and greater effectiveness of their use.

Adult↗

Mechanisms of virologic failure in previously untreated HIV-infected patients from a trial of induction-maintenance therapy. Trilège (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA 072) Study Team).

CONTEXT: In the Trilège trial, following induction with a zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir regimen, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication was less suppressed by 2-drug maintenance therapy than by triple-drug therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify mechanisms of virologic failure in the 3 arms of the Trilège trial. DESIGN: Case-control study conducted from February to October 1998. SETTING: Three urban hospitals in Paris, France. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight case patients with virologic failure (HIV RNA rebound to >500 copies/mL in 2 consecutive samples) randomized to 3 therapy groups: triple drug (zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir), 8; zidovudine-lamivudine, 29; and zidovudine-indinavir, 21; the case patients were randomly matched with 58 control patients with sustained viral suppression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At virologic failure (S1 sample) and 6 weeks later (S2 sample), assessment of protease and reverse transcriptase gene mutations, plasma indinavir level, and degree of viral load rebound; pill count during induction and maintenance periods. RESULTS: Only 1 primary resistance mutation, M184V, was detected in S1 plasma samples from 4 of 6 patients in the triple-drug and in all 22 in the zidovudine-lamivudine therapy groups and in S2 plasma samples from 3 of 6 in the triple-drug and 20 of 21 in the zidovudine-lamivudine groups. Of controls, M184V was detected in 11 of 13 S1 plasma samples and in 10 of 11 S2 plasma samples. Indinavir levels were undetectable in all S1 samples but 2 in 7 triple-drug cases tested and in the expected range in 11 of 18 S1 and 5 of 12 S2 zidovudine-indinavir case plasma samples tested. Maintenance adherence rates were lower for cases vs controls for zidovudine (P = .05) and indinavir (P = .05). Low indinavir levels, lower adherence rates for zidovudine (P = .04) and lamivudine (P = .03), and rebound to near-baseline values suggested adherence as cause of early failure for 4 of 8 triple-drug cases. In the zidovudine-lamivudine arm, for which case and control adherence rates did not differ significantly (P = .96), most failures occurred late with low rebound, suggesting suboptimal drug potency. In the zidovudine-indinavir arm, virologic failures may be related to both mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: During the maintenance phase early and late virologic failures appeared to be related more to problems of adherence and antiretroviral treatment potency, respectively, than to selection of resistant mutant viruses.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Longitudinal evaluation reveals a complex spectrum of virological profiles in hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is often associated with severe forms of liver disease. However, comprehensive studies are lacking, and scant information is available regarding the virological behavior over time in coinfected patients. This study enrolled 133 untreated HBV/HCV-positive patients (male/female = 102/31; median age 51 years [range: 22-83 years]) who were longitudinally followed up for 1 year with bimonthly evaluation of HBV/HCV viremia levels and liver biochemistry. Thirty of these patients had triple infection with hepatitis Delta virus (HDV), while 103 patients were HDV-negative. In the HDV-negative group, active infection with both HBV and HCV was revealed in 24 cases, inactive infection by both viruses was seen in 15 cases, active HBV/inactive HCV was seen in 15 cases, and inactive HBV/active HCV was seen in 49 cases. However, 32 subjects (31%) presented dynamic virological profiles characterized by fluctuation of HBV and/or HCV viremia levels that at different time points were over or under the cutoff limits. Consequently, a correct diagnosis could be performed in these subjects only by serially repeating the virological tests 1 year apart. Similarly, 15 of the 30 HDV-positive subjects showed active HBV and/or HCV infection, with fluctuating virological patterns in 8 cases. In conclusion, this study showed that the virological patterns in HBV/HCV coinfection are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles. A careful longitudinal evaluation of the viremia levels of both viruses is essential for making a correct diagnosis and tailoring the appropriate therapeutic schedule in coinfected patients.

Adult↗

Re-assessing the virological approach to HIV pathogenesis: can it explain AIDS as an immunological disease?

Over 10 years after the discovery of HIV, its molecular virology still fails to explain the clinical immunology of AIDS. The prevailing paradigm of AIDS pathogenesis, called here the "virological hypothesis", argues that viral attributes such as cytopathicity, replicability, syncytiality, cell tropism, emergent virulence, and viral load explain why infection develops to a life-threatening immunodeficiency. However, these attributes-singly and in combination-are shown here to be inadequate to explain the latency, immunological damage, and clinical dynamics of the disease of AIDS. The virological paradigm cannot explain the disease-free period (clinical latency); the mechanism and dynamics of CD4 T cell loss; the reason for the onset of disease at a given time-point; the relationship of CD4 T cell loss to AIDS-type disease; nor the idiosyncratic constellation of immunological and clinical phenomena that comprise AIDS as a unique syndrome. HIV as it is currently understood does not have the virological characteristics necessary to create a disease such as AIDS through direct classical (i.e. cytopathic) mechanisms. It is clear that the pathogenesis of AIDS remains unknown. Therefore, treatment based solely on inhibiting viral mechanisms-as with antivirals-is very likely to be insufficient. In addition, the molecular epidemiology of pathogenesis has been very poor; there is an enormous amount that is not known about the clinical immunology of AIDS, and the central question remains of how CD4 cell loss relates to clinical immunodeficiency. The conclusion drawn is that the virology of HIV has been pursed at the cost of understanding AIDS itself; that an emphasis on AIDS as an immunological disease is long overdue; and that appropriate treatment of AIDS will not be possible until the clinical immunology of AIDS is understood.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to alpha-interferon.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to determine the long-term outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who respond to interferon treatment with clearance of serum HCV RNA. METHODS: We performed a long-term biochemical, virological, and histological follow-up of all sustained virological responders, defined as those who became HCV RNA negative at follow-up 6 months after the end of treatment, from 3 controlled interferon trials performed in Sweden between 1988 and 1994. RESULTS: At biochemical and virological long-term follow-up performed in 26 sustained virological responders 3.5-8.8 years (mean +/- SD, 5.4+/-1.6 years) after the end of IFN therapy, 22 patients (85%) had normal serum ALT levels, and 24 patients (92%) were HCV RNA negative in serum. Liver biopsies performed in 23 patients 2.1-8.7 years (mean +/- SD, 5.0+/-1.8 years) after end of treatment showed no or minimal inflammation, whereas mild and probably irreversible fibrosis was seen in a few patients. CONCLUSION: In this well-defined material of sustained responders to IFN therapy, the long-term prognosis was excellent. Nearly all had a durable response, not only biochemically and virologically, but more importantly also histologically with normalisation or near normalisation of previous histological lesions.

Adult↗

Course of virologic breakthroughs under long-term lamivudine in HBeAg-negative precore mutant HBV liver disease.

We studied the course of virologic breakthroughs detected by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in 32 of 78 patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative precore mutant hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronic liver disease under long-term lamivudine monotherapy. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured every 3 months and on every biochemical breakthrough. YMDD mutants were detected in 30 of the 32 patients with virologic breakthroughs. Among these 32 patients, biochemical remission rate was 44% at 6 months, 21% at 12 months, and 0% at 24 months after the onset of virologic breakthrough. Development of biochemical breakthroughs was associated with a significant increase of serum HBV DNA levels, which exceeded 100,000 copies/mL in 19 of 20 patients (95%) with biochemical breakthroughs and in only 1 of 8 patients (12.5%) remaining in biochemical remission for at least 6 months after the onset of virologic breakthrough (P <.001). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level peaked within 0 to 3 months after the onset of biochemical breakthrough and decreased at 6 months but remained abnormal in all but 2 patients. Follow-up liver histologic lesions in patients with biochemical breakthroughs did not differ from baseline findings, although they were significantly improved in patients remaining in virologic and biochemical remission. In conclusion, the frequent emergence of viral resistance under long-term lamivudine monotherapy in HBeAg-negative precore mutant HBV chronic liver disease is followed by increasing viremia levels culminating in the development of biochemical breakthroughs in most cases. ALT activity peaks close to the onset of biochemical breakthrough, decreasing thereafter but remaining persistently abnormal with fluctuating levels.

Adult↗

Human T-lymphotropic virus, type 1, tax protein triggers microtubule reorientation in the virological synapse.

We showed recently that the human T-lymphotropic virus, type 1 (HTLV-1), spreads directly from cell to cell via a virological synapse. The HTLV-1 virological synapse resembles the immunological synapse; each is a specialized contact between a lymphocyte and another cell that contains organized protein microdomains, and each involves repolarization of the T-cell microtubule cytoskeleton. However, formation of the virological synapse is not triggered by T-cell receptor-mediated antigen recognition. On the basis of our previous data, we postulated that formation of the viral synapse was triggered by a conjunction of two signals, one from HTLV-1 infection of the T-cell and one from cell-cell contact. We have recently identified ICAM-1 engagement as a cell-contact signal that causes the microtubule polarization associated with the virological synapse. Here we used confocal microscopy of T-lymphocytes naturally infected with HTLV-1 or transfected with individual HTLV-1 genes to investigate the role of the viral transcriptional transactivator protein Tax. Polarization of the microtubules was induced by cell-cell contact or by cross-linking T-cell surface molecules with monoclonal antibodies adsorbed to latex beads. We show that Tax, which is mainly found in the nucleus, is also present at two specific extranuclear sites as follows: around the microtubule organizing center in association with the cis-Golgi and in the cell-cell contact region. We show that expression of Tax provides an intracellular signal that synergizes with ICAM-1 engagement to cause the T-cell microtubule polarization observed at the virological synapse.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

The reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation V118I is associated with virologic failure on abacavir-based antiretroviral treatment (ART) in HIV-1 infection.

Antiviral efficacy and serum lipids were investigated following a switch from long-term successful protease inhibitor based antiretroviral treatment (PI-ART) to abacavir-based ART in 29 patients who have been followed for 28 months thereafter. Virologic failure occurred within 3 months in 21% (6/29) of the patients, and abacavir hypersensitivity in 1 individual. The remaining 22 patients continue to have HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml after 28 months with a CD4 increase from 605 +/- 265 x 10(6)/l to 798 +/- 366 x 10(6)/l (p < 0.001). All virologic failing patients had been on long-term unsuccessful nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy before PI-ART as compared to 32% (7/22) of the virologic non-failing patients (p < 0.01). The viral strains from the virologic failing patients harboured 3-6 reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations, including the V118I mutation in 5/6 cases prior to PI-ART or at viral rebound. Only the V118I RT mutation was statistically more common among virologic failing than non-failing NRTI pretreated patients (p < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression analysis for viral failure resulted in a model with only the V118I RT mutation entering the model (p < 0.01). The LDL cholesterol and triglyceride values decreased and the HDL cholesterol increased after the switch to abacavir-based ART (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, viral failure was associated with prior mono- or dual-NRTI treatment and the occurrence of the V1181 RT mutation, persisting despite long term viral control. The selection process for patients suitable for treatment simplification to abacavir-based ART should contain a detailed antiretroviral treatment history.

Adult↗

Long-term clinical outcome of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with discordant immunologic and virologic responses to a protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

Within a prospective cohort of 150 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who began first-line protease inhibitor therapy in 1996, the outcome of 42 patients with discrepant virologic and immunologic responses to antiretroviral treatment at 12 months was analyzed at 30 months of treatment. The incidence of AIDS-defining events and deaths (14%) in the group of patients with immunologic responses in the absence of a virologic response was higher than that in full-responder patients (2%); yet, the incidence in this group was lower than that in patients with no immunologic response, despite a virologic response (21%), and was lower than that in patients without an immunologic or virologic response (67%; P<.0001, log-rank test). Differences in outcome were significant (relative risk, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-39.3) when factors for progression were compared with those of responder patients. The results support the relevance of the CD4 cell marker over plasma HIV load for predicting clinical outcome in patients who do not achieve full immunologic and virologic responses.

Adult↗

Value of patient self-report and plasma human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor level as markers of adherence to antiretroviral therapy: relationship to virologic response.

Three methods of adherence to antiretroviral therapy were evaluated for 149 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): plasma level of protease inhibitors (PIs), patient self-report, and routine biological parameters associated with the use of some antiretroviral drugs. Adherence to therapy was estimated from a score calculated from answers to a self-administered questionnaire and on the basis of measurement of relevant plasma and blood levels. Of the 149 patients, 112 had a virologic response, and 122 had adequate trough PI levels. Plasma PI levels and virologic outcome were significantly correlated (P<.0001). The adherence score was significantly correlated with virologic response (P<.001). Macrocytosis was significantly associated with virologic response in the patients treated with zidovudine or stavudine (P=.006). PI level was the higher significant predictor of virologic response (P=.0003). Self-reported adherence (P=.01) and macrocytosis (P=.05) were also independently associated with antiretroviral efficacy.

Adult↗

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy predicts virologic outcome at an inner-city human immunodeficiency virus clinic.

This study's hypothesis is that human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the inner city (predominantly injection drug users and ethnic minorities) do not take highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) as prescribed and that nonadherence leads to virologic failure. A prospective, observational, 3-month study of adherence to HAART was undertaken at an inner-city clinic. There were 40 subjects [110 subject-months]; 30 were male, 10 were female, 75% were Hispanic, 23% were African American, 68% were injection drug users, and 68% were receiving triple therapy. At 3 months, adherence, which was determined by use of the Medication Event Monitoring System (Aprex) was significantly associated with virologic success: lower virus loads were associated with a rate of adherence of >80% (P<.05). Although nonadherence predicted virologic failure, virologic success was not always predicted by adherence: 11 (27.5%) of 40 subjects with suboptimal adherence rates (<90%) had complete virologic suppression.

Adult↗

Improved outcomes with earlier initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who achieve durable virologic suppression: longer follow-up of an observational cohort study.

On the basis of studies with relatively short follow-up, treatment guidelines currently recommend that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) be initiated in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients when the CD4+ lymphocyte count is < or =200 cells/mm3. We assessed the development of a new opportunistic infection or death among 1173 patients initiating HAART. Durable virologic suppression was defined as having more undetectable (<400 copies/mL) than detectable virus loads after the initiation of therapy. The median durations of therapy and follow-up were 29 and 36 months, respectively. Among patients who achieved durable virologic suppression, those with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts of <200 cells/mm3 tended to progress faster than those with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts of 201-350 cells/mm3 (P=.09) and progressed faster than those with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts of >350 cells/mm3 (P=.01). Among those with durable virologic suppression, there was no difference in disease progression between those with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts of 201-350 cells/mm3 and those with durable virologic suppression with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts of >350 cells/mm3 (P=.40). Initiating HAART with a CD4+ lymphocyte count of <200 cells/mm3 was associated with a higher risk of disease progression, even with durable virologic suppression. HAART should be initiated at CD4+ lymphocyte counts of >200 cells/mm3.

Adult↗

Virologic and immunologic outcomes after 24 weeks in HIV type 1-infected adolescents receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents represent the fastest growing demographic group of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections in the United States. At present, there is little information available about their response to therapy. METHODS: We studied 120 adolescents infected via high-risk behaviors who began receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), to determine their virologic and immunologic response to therapy. RESULTS: Subjects were enrolled at 28 sites of the Pediatric Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Clinical Trials Group. After 16-24 weeks of HAART, 59% of subjects had reproducible undetectable virus loads, according to repeat measurements (virologic success). As enumerated by flow-cytometric analysis, increases in levels of CD4 helper cells (both naive and memory) and decreases in levels of CD8 suppressor cells were observed. Partial restoration of some immunologic parameters for patients who did not achieve virologic success was also observed, but to a more limited extent than for adolescents with virologic success. Adherence to HAART was the only predictor of achieving undetectable virus loads. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents have the capacity to improve their immunologic status with HAART. Lower than expected success in virologic control is related to lack of adherence, and efforts to improve treatment outcome must stress measures to assure adherence to medication.

Adolescent↗

Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study verified the effect of adherence on the risk of virologic failure. METHODS: At enrollment in the study, a total of 543 patients who were following a steady (duration, >or=6 months) and effective (viral load, <50 human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] RNA copies/mL) regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) completed a self-reported questionnaire derived from the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Adherence Follow-up Questionnaire. Patients were followed up for the subsequent 6 months to document virologic failure, which was defined as 2 consecutive viral load measurements of >500 HIV RNA copies/mL. RESULTS: Only the type of treatment and the adherence rate at baseline were significantly associated with the virologic end point. Among patients who reported an adherence rate of 95%. When analysis was adjusted according to the type of regimen received, patients who were receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of up to 85% had a virologic failure rate of >20%, whereas, only for patients who were receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of 10%. For the comparison of NNRTI-treated patients and PI-treated patients with an adherence rate of 75%-95%, the odds ratio was 0.157 (95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.852). The number of pills and daily doses received correlated with the reported adherence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving NNRTIs report a higher rate of adherence than do patients receiving PIs. Adherence is significantly influenced by the number of pills and daily doses received. Low adherence is a major determinant of virologic failure; however, different therapies have different cutoff values for adherence that determine a significant increment of risk.

Adult↗

A randomized study of serial telephone call support to increase adherence and thereby improve virologic outcome in persons initiating antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy is difficult, and methods to increase it are needed. METHODS: We tested the impact of supportive telephone calls in an adherence substudy of a treatment trial. Subjects initiating antiretroviral therapy received either each site's usual adherence support measures or usual support measures and scripted serial telephone calls (16 calls during 96 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 282 subjects enrolled: 140 in the usual support measures group and 142 in the calls group. A total of 75% of expected calls were completed. Virologic failure occurred in 97 (34%) subjects: 52 (37%) of those in the usual support measures group and 45 (32%) of those in the calls group; time to virologic failure was not different (P=.32). In each group, >72% of subjects reported > or =95% adherence, with no difference between groups. Independent predictors of higher rates of virologic failure were <95% adherence, receiving the 4-drug regimen with nelfinavir, and female sex; older age was associated with decreased likelihood of virologic failure. Receiving the 4-drug regimen with nelfinavir, higher stress scores, older age, and higher call completion rates were independently associated with higher adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Serial telephone calls did not improve virologic outcome but had an impact on self-reported adherence.

Adult↗

Comparative biological and clinical outcomes after a switch from a virologically unsuccessful first protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral combination to a 3-drug regimen containing efavirenz, nevirapine, or abacavir.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete adherence is the main cause of antiretroviral therapy failure during initial combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). A switch to a protease inhibitor-sparing cART may be useful when a patient does not tolerate a first protease inhibitor-containing cART regimen. METHODS: To compare the biological and clinical outcomes of patients in whom a first protease inhibitor-containing cART regimen failed to control viral replication and whose treatment was switched to cART containing efavirenz, nevirapine, or abacavir, we studied 1440 patients from the French Hospital Database on HIV whose treatment was changed from a first protease inhibitor-containing cART to a 3-drug regimen with either efavirenz, nevirapine, or abacavir while their plasma viral load was detectable. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier 12-month probabilities of virological suppression were 73.6%, 53.9%, and 66.1% among patients whose treatment was switched to efavirenz-cART, nevirapine-cART, and abacavir-cART, respectively. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of virological suppression were antiretroviral exposure before the first cART, higher plasma viral load values at the treatment switch, a stavudine-lamivudine backbone after the switch (instead of a zidovudine-lamivudine backbone), and a switch to nevirapine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.74], compared with efavirenz) or abacavir (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68-1.04] compared with efavirenz). There was no difference among the 3 groups with regard to immunological gain (>50 CD4+ T cells/mm3) or clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: When virological rebound occurs from receipt of protease inhibitor-containing cART, virological suppression can be obtained after a switch to a protease inhibitor-free cART--efavirenz-cART yielding the highest rate of virological suppression.

Adult↗