Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Traction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Traction versus distension for distraction of the joint during hip arthroscopy.

Distraction is the most popular technique used in hip arthroscopy. It has been postulated that, if adequate distraction cannot initially be achieved with traction, it will be overcome by distension. The purpose of this study is to quantitate the additive effects of traction and distension in achieving distraction of the hip joint for arthroscopy. Eleven consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy in the supine position on a fracture table were studied. Radiographs of the hip were obtained before and immediately after applying 50 pounds of traction. The hip was then immediately distended with 40 mL saline, and a third radiograph was obtained. After correcting for magnification, distraction was measured for traction alone (DT) and traction plus distension (DTD). A paired t-test was used to compare DT and DTD. Additionally, the ratio of distraction attributed to distension was compared with distraction attributed to traction ([DTD--DT]/DT) and was defined as the delta percent (delta %). Adequate distraction for arthroscopy was able to be achieved in all cases. Distraction due to traction alone (DT) ranged from 2.8 mm to 10.3 mm, with an average of 6.2 mm. Distraction due to traction plus distension (DTD) ranged from 4.8 m to 10.3 mm, with an average of 7.2 mm. The difference between DT and DTD was statistically significant (P < .05). The change in distraction due to distension (delta %) ranged from 0% to 81% with an average of 22%. This study shows that distension may facilitate distraction but the degree is variable.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Intraoperative traction testing to detect incomplete inferior oblique myotomy/myectomy.

PURPOSE: Incomplete transection of the inferior oblique muscle during myotomy or myectomy is an important preventable cause of ineffective inferior oblique weakening surgery. Intraoperative traction testing has been suggested as a means of detecting an incomplete inferior oblique transection. The usefulness of intraoperative traction testing to detect incomplete myotomy was evaluated. METHODS: The subjective "tightness" of the inferior oblique muscle was evaluated after partial and complete myotomy to determine how partial myotomy affected inferior oblique traction testing and to determine whether intraoperative traction testing is an effective means of ensuring that a complete myotomy has been achieved. Serial traction testing was performed on 10 inferior oblique muscles at the time of myotomy and scored, 0+ to 4+ tightness. Testing was performed before myotomy and after 50%, 90%, and total myotomy. RESULTS: In 8 of 10 eyes traction testing remained strongly positive until the inferior oblique muscle had been completely transected. The average inferior oblique muscle tightness of these eight muscles was +1.69 before myotomy and after 50% and 90% myotomy. The tightness decreased to 0 after 100% myotomy. In two cases no inferior oblique muscle could be detected after 50% and 90% myotomy, respectively. These two muscles had preoperative traction testing of +0.5 and +1.00, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative traction testing is a practical and effective method of detecting incomplete inferior oblique myotomy/myectomy, but the test should be interpreted with caution in patients with loose premyotomy muscles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Quantitative analysis of traction in the glenohumeral joint. In vivo radiographic measurements.

PURPOSE: To analyse change in distance between the humeral head and the glenoid fossa during traction in the maximally loose-packed position (MLPP) and the maximally closed-packed position (MCPP) under standardized conditions. SUBJECTS: Six healthy subjects (three male and three female) with a mean age of 40.5 years, volunteered to participate in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were placed with the right shoulder in a modified shoulder brace (Otto Bock Armabduktions-Orthese in Modular Bauweise in 45 degrees abduction in the plane of the scapula with neutral rotation (MLPP). A standard anterior-posterior radiograph of the glenohumeral joint was made. A 14 kg traction force was applied for 40s, and a second radiograph was made. The same procedure was repeated with the shoulder placed in the MCPP, which was 90 degrees abduction and 90 degrees external rotation. A radiologist, blinded for the variable traction or no traction, performed all radiographic measurements. Measurements were made on the same radiographs on two separate occasions (O1 and O2) with a 2-month interval. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean distance between the humeral head and the glenoid fossa during traction in the MLPP compared to traction in the MCPP (O1: P=1.00) and (O2: P=0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Application of a 14 kg force does not result in a significant increase of distance between the humeral head and the glenoid fossa. No significant difference was found between the change in distance of the humeral head and the glenoid fossa after traction in the MLPP compared to traction in the MCPP.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Preoperative halo-traction in severe paralytic scoliosis].

AIM: During the past decades the treatment of severe paralytic scoliosis has developed towards surgical treatment. However there is controversial discussion about the need of pre-operative Halo-traction. The aim of this study was to built two groups of patients -- one group with and another one without pre-operative Halo-traction -- and to compare the results after surgical correction of scoliotic deformity with data from literature. METHOD: Between 2000-2003 twenty-five patients with severe neuromuscular spine deformity were treated surgically. Eight patients had preoperative Halo-traction, seventeen patients underwent directly operative correction and instrumentation. The evaluation included the pre- and postoperative X-rays as well those after Halo-traction before surgery. RESULTS: In the group without Halo-traction the scoliotic angle according to Cobb was reduced from 77 degrees to 33 degrees on average (mean correction of 44 degrees [57 %]). In the group with Halo-traction scoliosis was reduced from 85 degrees to 33 degrees on average (mean correction of 52 degrees [61 %]). CONCLUSION: The preoperative Halo-traction in patients with severe neuromuscular scoliosis indeed leads to radiologically higher correction, but this is not significant (p = 0.19) and only in single cases clinically relevant. In our point of view except from specific indications Halo-traction should not be applied in general as a standard procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Friction--slipping--traction.

The minimum translational traction requirements of outsoles for shoes used for walking, running, and activities involving lateral movements are presented. Since it will be shown that the classical friction relationships described by Coulomb do not always apply to the elastomeric materials used in modern day athletic footwear, empirical measures of the traction characteristics of candidate materials and designs must be made. A physical traction testing device has been developed to make measurements of the traction characteristics of shoe outsoles will be described. This device quantifies both translational and rotational traction characteristics. Examples of factors affecting both of these variables are presented. Combining a knowledge of the traction characteristics of materials and designs and the factors influencing traction with knowledge of the traction requirements of different activities permits the matching of appropriate outsoles to shoes used for specific activities.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1986

Goodley polyaxial cervical traction. A new approach to a traditional treatment.

A cervical traction system is discussed that offers advantages over traditional methods of applying cervical traction. The major advantage of this system is that it allows precise application of traction to only the restricted spinal segments. Because of this specificity, traction may be applied at reduced force, decreasing the risk of injury. The traction apparatus is adjusted easily to the individual and may be used in the clinic or at home. My experience with the apparatus has shown greater patient compliance, resulting in increased treatment effectiveness, when compared with traditional traction methods. Four representative case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of this traction system. Closely controlled studies are needed to substantiate the effectiveness and safety of this traction system.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Traction in developmental dislocation of the hip. Is its use justified?

Traction has been used for decades in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip. Traction is advocated to facilitate closed reduction and to decrease the need for open reduction. The use of prereduction traction also is advocated to decrease the incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance (aseptic necrosis). Recently, several studies have called into question this widely accepted adjunct in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip. A critical look was taken at the use of traction in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip and whether its use can be justified by the existing medical literature was ascertained. Although there are several impressive reports of the positive effects of traction in developmental dislocation of the hip, there are no clinical or experimental studies on the direct effect of traction. There are also no well controlled studies to analyze the effect of traction as a single variable. Thus, it cannot be proven that traction alters the outcome of developmental dislocation of the hip treatment, and hence, there is only anecdotal basis for its use in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip.

Femur Head Necrosis↗
PubMed1994

Extramedullary skeletal traction for intramedullary femoral nailing.

The through-and-through forms of femoral skeletal traction that are often used during intramedullary nailing for femur fractures can present two problems: (a) impingement with the intramedullary nail, requiring repositioning of the traction pin intraoperatively under radiographic control, to a position that may not optimally control the fracture; and (b) the risk of contaminating the intramedullary canal that will soon contain the metallic fixation device, especially when placed in the emergency room or at the bedside. Two new forms of extramedullary skeletal femoral traction are presented. The pullout strength and optimal positioning of these devices on the distal femur were evaluated. The first form of extramedullary traction evaluated was the large AO/ASIF pinless clamp. The second form of extramedullary traction, the extramedullary skeletal clamp, was based on a modification of the Gardner-Wells tong. These two forms of skeletal traction were compared with standard tensioned Kirschner wire (K-wire) through-and-through traction. Six fresh-frozen distal femora from donors (average age 29 years) were used to test the three femoral traction devices. Five of these specimens were skeletally mature. A total of 38 pullout tests were conducted. The pullout strength of the tested devices was in the following descending order: (a) tensioned K-wire; (b) extramedullary skeletal clamp (in the optimal metadiaphyseal position, 77% the strength of the K-wire); and (c) large ASIF pinless clamp (in the optimal metaphyseal position, 46% the strength of the K-wire). The mode of failure for each device was cut out through or from the bone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

An experimental study on spinal cord traction effect.

An experimental study was carried out on the pathophysiology of spinal cord traction injury. In 50 dogs, spinal cord traction impairment was created by gradual lumbosacral cord traction. Physiologic integrity of the spinal cord was monitored and recorded by the spinal evoked potentials. With greater traction force, the potentials gradually lessened in amplitude. The vulnerability of the spinal cord to compression force was increased by spinal cord traction. Under 200 g traction, the vulnerability of the lower thoracic cord was most increased. The authors conclude that tethered cord syndrome is caused by the impairment of the spinal cord and lumbosacral roots due to traction, and that spinal cord traction not only causes spinal cord impairment but increases the spinal cord vulnerability to compression.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1997

Interpretation and utility of traction radiography in scoliosis surgery. Analysis of patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: An analysis of a standardized method of traction radiography for the evaluation of reducibility of scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether and how preoperative fraction radiography can provide objective information and to compare traction radiography with supine side-bending radiography. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Flexibility of scoliosis deformity remains an arbitrary concept. No objective method of preoperative evaluation of reducibility has been established. METHODS: The utility of a standardized method of traction radiography was evaluated in 74 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were aged 14-22 years and treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. RESULTS: In thoracic curves, the postoperative Cobb angle was highly correlated with the preoperative Cobb angle in traction (r = 0.82). However, such correlation was much lower with lumbar curves (r = 0.54). The reducibility of the thoracic curve by traction as expressed by the ratio to the original curve was dependent on the magnitude of the original curve (P = 0.005), and this parameter proved less informative than the absolute angle values. Time-related analysis of 30 patients who were observed for more than 5 years revealed that the high correlation between the preoperative angle of thoracic curves in traction and their postoperative angle decreased with the follow-up time (r = 0.80-0.65). A comparison of traction radiography and supine side-bending radiography showed that these two tests were practically equivalent in terms of evaluating the reducibility of curves. CONCLUSION: The results provide an objective interpretation of traction radiographs for scoliosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients that underwent perioperative halo-gravity traction as an adjunct to modern instrumentation methods in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis. OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and radiographic results of perioperative halo-gravity traction in several time periods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few reports to our knowledge review the use of perioperative and intraoperative halo-gravity traction in this patient population. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with severe operative scoliosis, kyphoscoliosis, or kyphosis were studied based on hospital records, standing pretreatment, traction (before anterior/posterior fusion), postoperative (each stage), and final radiographs. Patients were analyzed by age at date of examination (range, 2-20 years; mean, 13.8 years), gender (18 male, 15 female), major coronal curve magnitude (range, 22 degrees-158 degrees; average, 84 degrees), major compensatory coronal curve magnitude (range, 8 degrees-123 degrees; average, 51 degrees), major sagittal curve magnitude (range, 13 degrees-143 degrees; average, 78 degrees), traction protocol, and procedure type. Halo-traction-related, short- and long-term complications were noted in each case. RESULTS: The major coronal curve reduced 38 degrees or 46% after posterior spinal fusion compared to pretreatment radiographs. At an average of 44 months radiographic follow-up (range, 24-107 months), the loss of correction averaged 7 degrees for major coronal curves and 4 degrees of thoracic kyphosis. Clinical complications were noted in the perioperative and long-term time periods. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of severe scoliosis can be very challenging despite the benefits of modern instrumentation methods, especially if there is a significant kyphosis or a history of intraspinal pathology. Halo-gravity traction is a safe, well-tolerated method of applying gradual, sustained traction to maximize postoperative correction in this difficult population. There were no permanent neurologic deficits in this series.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Femoral intramedullary nailing: comparison of fracture-table and manual traction. a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare manual traction and fracture-table traction for the reduction and nailing of femoral shaft fractures. We evaluated the quality of the reduction, operative time, complications, and functional status of the patient. METHODS: Eighty-seven consecutive adult patients with a unilateral fracture of the femoral diaphysis that did not extend into the knee joint or proximal to the lesser trochanter were enrolled in the study. Patients who were transferred to our institution more than forty-eight hours after injury; those with multiple-system injuries, injury to the ipsilateral lower extremity, or pathological fracture; and those who were unable or unwilling to provide consent or to return for follow-up were excluded. Forty-five patients were randomized to manual traction and forty-two, to fracture-table traction; all were treated in the supine position. The number of surgical assistants, operative and fluoroscopy time, complications, functional scores, and other outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age, gender, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, side or mechanism of injury, fracture type, or time from injury to treatment. Internal malrotation was significantly more common when the fracture table had been used: twelve (29%) of the forty-two femora were internally rotated by >10 compared with three (7%) of the forty-five treated with manual traction (p = 0.007). Total operative time, from the beginning of the patient positioning to the completion of the skin closure, was decreased from a mean of 139 minutes (range, 100 to 212 minutes) when the fracture table was used to a mean of 119 minutes (range, sixty-five to 180 minutes) when manual traction was used (p = 0.033). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups with regard to the number of assistants per case (mean two; range, zero to three), fluoroscopy time, other complications including femoral shortening or lengthening, or functional status of the patient at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with fracture-table traction with the patient in a supine position, manual traction for intramedullary nailing of isolated fractures of the femoral shaft is an effective technique that decreases operative time and improves the quality of the reduction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Superior labral anteroposterior lesions: MR arthrography with arm traction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of arm traction combined with MR arthrography in the evaluation of superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric shoulders were studied with a 1.5-T MR imaging unit with the arm externally rotated. Fifteen milliliters of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent were injected into the glenohumeral joint. Twenty-four sets of images of cadaveric joints were evaluated independently by two observers. These sets consisted of MR arthrographic images obtained with traction (applied to the wrist using 1- to 3-kg weights) and without traction in five shoulders in which SLAP lesions had been excluded arthroscopically or by cadaveric sectioning; and MR arthrographic images obtained with and without traction in seven shoulders in which various types of SLAP lesions had been created arthroscopically and later confirmed by cadaveric sectioning. RESULTS: Analysis of the data indicated that MR arthrography in combination with arm traction and external rotation improved diagnostic accuracy with regard to identification and categorization of SLAP lesions when compared with studies made without traction. CONCLUSION: The combination of MR arthrography and arm traction with the shoulder in external rotation provides a more effective approach for detection of SLAP lesions than does similar MR arthrography performed without arm traction.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis in children.

SUMMARY: Perioperative halo traction was used in the treatment of severe scoliosis in 19 children. Diagnoses included neuromuscular, idiopathic, and congenital scoliosis. Traction was transferable between the bed and a walker or wheelchair. Thirteen patients had prior spinal surgery, and most required osteotomy. Traction was used for 6 to 21 weeks. All patients underwent spinal fusion surgery after traction, with instrumentation used in 15 patients. Improvement was achieved in all patients. The Cobb angle improved 35% from an average 84 degrees before traction (range 63 degrees -100 degrees ) to 55 degrees preceding fusion. Trunk decompensation improved in all patients. Trunk height increased 5.3 cm in traction. Response to traction did not correlate with diagnosis, patient age, or prior surgery. There were no neurologic complications. Perioperative halo-gravity traction improves trunk balance and frontal and sagittal alignment in children with severe spinal deformity. Surgical fusion was enhanced by the improved alignment, and neurologic injury was avoided.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

[Mesenteric traction syndrome during the operation of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta--histamine release and prophylaxis with antihistaminics].

Mesenteric traction syndrome occurs during abdominal surgery and is described as sudden tachycardia, hypotension and flush. Among other etiological factors, eventeration or mesenteric traction of the small intestine may cause histamine release from mesenteric mast cells. Therefore, our hypothesis was that mesenteric traction syndrome could be positively influenced by prophylactic administration of H1- and and H2-antihistamines. Seventeen male patients (ASA groups III-V, 48-78 years old) were investigated in a randomised double blind study during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair; which, in our opinion, is one of the most standardised surgical procedures. Eight patients had pre-anaesthetic prophylaxis with 0.1 mg/kg BW dimetindene (H1-receptor antagonist) plus 5 mg/kg BW cimetidine (H2-receptor antagonist) diluted with 100 ml 0.9% NaCl, while 9 patients received a placebo (100 ml 0.9% NaCl). Anaesthesia and invasive haemodynamic monitoring were standardised in all patients. Haemodynamic parameters, plasma histamine concentrations and clinical symptoms were determined one min after skin incision (HS), and 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction (5' EV and 20' EV). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney-U-test for continuous data and Chi2-test for incidences. The incidence of histamine release was 55.5% (5/9) in the placebo group vs. 37.5% (3/8) in the antihistamine group (p > 0.05, Chi2-test). Plasma histamine levels (mean +/- SD) were higher in the placebo group than in the antihistamine group at 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction, but there was no statistical significance. Arrhythmias were significantly more frequent in the placebo group (6 times) than in the antihistamine group (none) (p = 0.005 Chi2-test). Systolic blood pressure was not statistically different between the groups (e.g. 5 min after mesenteric traction, mean +/- SD; placebo 111 +/- 20 mm Hg vs. antihistamines 119 +/- 35 mm Hg). In the placebo group, however, the haemodynamics only stabilised 5 min after mesenteric traction when anaesthetic gas concentration was repeatedly reduced and vasopressor/volume administration was increased (placebo group = 20 times vs. antihistamine group = 8 times (p = 0.001, Chi2-test). From these results we conclude that prophylactic administration of antihistamines reduces in particular the incidence of arrhythmias and the number of stabilising measures during mesenteric traction. Prophylaxis with H1- and H2-antihistamines may therefore be of perioperative benefit and should be considered in AAA surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

[An experimental study of spinal cord traction syndrome].

An experimental study was carried out on the pathophysiology of spinal cord traction syndrome. In fifty dogs, spinal cord traction impairment was created by gradual lumbosacral cord traction. Physiological integrity of the spinal cord was monitored and recorded by the spinal evoked potentials. The earliest change of the spinal evoked potentials and lumbar roots potentials was transient augmentation of the amplitude. With greater traction force, the potentials gradually decreased in amplitude. The spinal cord vulnerability to compression was increased by spinal cord traction. Under 200 g traction, the vulnerability of the lower thoracic cord was most increased while those of the upper thoracic and lumbar cord were unchanged. The authors conclude that tethered cord syndrome is caused by the impairment of the spinal cord and lumbosacral roots due to traction, and that spinal cord traction not only causes spinal cord impairment but increases the spinal cord vulnerability to compression.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Comparison of skeletal traction forces in patients treated in conventional and oscillating hospital beds.

This study compares the forces in two types of skeletal traction systems: a standard hospital bed with balanced suspension traction and an oscillating hospital bed using a flexion cable system. In line traction, forces were continuously measured, using a specially designed transducer. Changes in the magnitude of traction forces of up to two times the applied force were caused by patient movement, nursing procedures, and changes in bed configuration. The oscillating hospital bed was found additionally to impart a moderate (20-50%) rhythmic, sinusoidal variation in applied traction forces. The traction forces applied with the flexion cable system on the oscillating hospital bed were well tolerated and equivalent to those applied in conventional balanced suspension on a standard hospital bed. Although different in design, standard balanced suspension traction on a conventional hospital bed and traction using the flexion cable system on the oscillating hospital bed appear to be equally effective in stabilizing fracture sites.

Acetabulum↗
PubMed2002

Histamine release in mesenteric traction syndrome during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: prophylaxis with H1 and H2 antihistamines.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Mesenteric traction syndrome is described as sudden tachycardia, hypotension and flush. Among other etiological factors eventeration or mesenteric traction of the small intestine may cause histamine release from mesenteric mast cells. We hypothesized that mesenteric traction syndrome may be positively influenced by prophylactic antihistamine administration. METHODS: Male patients (n = 17, ASA groups III-IV, 48-78 years old) were investigated in a randomised double blind study during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Eight patients had pre-anaesthetic prophylaxis with dimetindene (H1-receptor antagonist) plus cimetidine (H2-receptor antagonist), 9 patients received placebo. Anaesthesia and invasive haemodynamic monitoring were standardised in all patients. Haemodynamic parameters, plasma histamine concentrations and clinical symptoms were determined 1 min after skin incision, as well as 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-test, Chi2-test for incidences and Mann-Whitney-U-test for continuous data. RESULTS: The incidence of histamine release was 55.5% (5/9) in the placebo group vs. 37.5% (3/8) in the antihistamine group (p > 0.05, Chi2-test). Plasma histamine levels (mean +/- SD) were higher in the placebo group than in the antihistamine group at 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Arrhythmias were significantly more frequent in the placebo group (6 times) than in the antihistamine group (none) (p = 0.005 Chi2-test). Systolic blood pressure was not statistically different between groups (e.g. 5 min after mesenteric traction, mean +/- SD; placebo 111 +/- 20 mm Hg vs. antihistamines 119 +/- 35 mm Hg). However, in the placebo group the haemodynamics only stabilised 5 min after mesenteric traction when anaesthetic gas concentration was repeatedly reduced and vasopressor/volume administration was increased (placebo-group = 20 times/antihistamine-group = 8 times, p = 0.001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of antihistamines reduced the incidence of histamine release as well as the incidence of arrhythmias and the amount of stabilising measures during mesenteric traction. Prophylaxis with H1 and H2 antihistamines may be of perioperative benefit and should therefore be considered in AAA-surgery.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗