Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Timolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

The effect of chronic timolol in an animal model for myocardial infarction.

The effect of no drug or timolol (5 mg/kg, PO, for 1, 2, or 8 weeks on postganglionic cardiac sympathetic neural discharge, blood pressure, heart rate and beta-receptor density after acute coronary occlusion of the left anterior descending artery was compared. Beta-receptor density, determined by binding of 3H-dihydroalprenolol, was examined in the myocardium (LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, LV1 = proximal and LV2 = distal left anterior descending artery distribution, LV3 = posterior left ventricle, S = septum, and RV = right ventricle). In control cats (no coronary occlusion or timolol) beta-receptor density of LV2 and LV3 was greater (P less than .05) than LA, RA, LV1, and RV. LV3 was greater (P less than .05) than S and RA, and LA was less than S. Longer treatment with timolol increased beta-receptor density. When compared with no timolol, beta-receptor density was greater in RA after 8 weeks and in LV1 after 2 weeks and not different in LV2 and S. Beta-receptor density and LV3 and RV were greater after 8 weeks than after 1 week or no timolol. Spearman rank correlation coefficients between dose and beta-receptor density revealed an increase (P less than .05) for all heart areas. Heart rate did not vary before timolol and was decreased after all doses of timolol. Timolol increased the mean times to coronary occlusion-induced death although the increase was not statistically significant. Timolol did not prevent postganglionic cardiac sympathetic neural discharge associated with arrhythmia. Timolol may increase beta-receptor density and decrease synaptic norepinephrine, causing a decreased release per cardiac sympathetic nerve impulse. Alternatively, molecules of timolol may accumulate in nerve endings and be released in greater concentrations at the receptors. This could explain the protection against coronary occlusion-induced arrhythmia and death.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of topical brinzolamide 1% and dorzolamide 2% eye drops given twice daily in addition to timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: The aim was to compare topical brinzolamide 1% twice daily with dorzolamide 2% twice daily, each given with timolol 0.5% twice daily, for safety and effects on intraocular pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, active controlled, parallel group study was conducted multinationally at 31 sites, in 241 patients as above, with assessments at baseline and monthly during 3 months of treatment. The primary end point was a diurnal reduction of trough/peak intraocular pressure from a timolol 0.5% twice daily baseline. RESULTS: Both treatment regimens reduced intraocular pressure significantly at all time points (P <.001): brinzolamide plus timolol by -3.6 to -5.3 mm Hg (-14.2 to -21.9%), dorzolamide plus timolol by -3.6 mm Hg to -5.1 mm Hg (-14.1 to -21.2%). Clinically relevant intraocular pressure reductions (decreases 5 mm Hg or greater or absolute intraocular pressure values 21 mm Hg or less) were manifested by 50.0% to 89.3% of patients under brinzolamide plus timolol and by 43.9% to 85.4% under dorzolamide plus timolol. The treatments were equivalent in mean intraocular pressure-lowering. In general, both regimens were well tolerated. However, more patients (P =.001) experienced at least one adverse event with dorzolamide plus timolol (32.8%) as compared with brinzolamide plus timolol (14.7%); also, more patients (P =.001) experienced ocular discomfort (stinging and burning) after dorzolamide plus timolol (13.1%) than after brinzolamide plus timolol (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of intraocular pressure reduction, brinzolamide 1% twice daily was equivalent to dorzolamide 2% twice daily, each added to timolol 0.5% twice daily, but brinzolamide produced significantly less ocular burning and stinging.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2001

Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of two concentrations of travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) compared with latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Eight hundred one patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomly assigned to travoprost 0.0015%, travoprost 0.004%, latanoprost 0.005%, or timolol 0.5%. The efficacy and safety of travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) daily was compared with latanoprost daily and timolol twice daily for a period of 12 months. RESULTS: Travoprost was equal or superior to latanoprost and superior to timolol with mean intraocular pressure over visits and time of day ranging from 17.9 to 19.1 mm Hg (travoprost 0.0015%), 17.7 to 19.1 mm Hg (travoprost 0.004%), 18.5 to 19.2 mm Hg (latanoprost), and 19.4 to 20.3 mm Hg (timolol). For all visits pooled, the mean intraocular pressure at 4 PM for travoprost was 0.7 mm Hg (0.0015%, P =.0502) and 0.8 mm Hg (0.004%, P =.0191) lower than for latanoprost. Travoprost 0.004% was more effective than latanoprost and timolol in reducing intraocular pressure in black patients by up to 2.4 mm Hg (versus latanoprost) and 4.6 mm Hg (versus timolol). Based on a criterion of 30% or greater intraocular pressure reduction from diurnal baseline or intraocular pressure 17 mm Hg or less, travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% had an overall response to treatment of 49.3% and 54.7%, respectively, compared with 49.6% for latanoprost and 39.0% for timolol. Iris pigmentation change was observed in 10 of 201 of patients (5.0%) receiving travoprost 0.0015%, six of 196 of patients (3.1%) receiving travoprost 0.004%, 10 of 194 of patients (5.2%) receiving latanoprost, and none of the patients receiving timolol (0 of 196). The average ocular hyperemia score was less than 1 on a scale of 0 to 3, indicating that on average patients experienced between none/trace and mild for all treatment groups. There were no serious, unexpected, related adverse events reported for any therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%), a highly selective, potent prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonist, is equal or superior to latanoprost and superior to timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In addition, travoprost 0.004% is significantly better than either latanoprost or timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in black patients. Travoprost is safe and generally well tolerated in the studied patient population.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of topical timolol on tissue circulation in optic nerve head.

The effects of topical 0.5% timolol on tissue circulation in the albino rabbit optic nerve head (ONH) were investigated using a laser speckle tissue circulation analyzer. In the first experiment, the normalized blur (NB) value, a quantitative index of tissue blood flow velocity in the ONH, intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, and pulse rate were measured under general anesthesia before, and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after a 20 microL instillation of timolol in one eye and the vehicle in the other eye in a masked, randomized manner. In the second experiment, one eye of a rabbit received timolol twice daily for 20 days and the fellow eye received the vehicle in a masked, randomized manner. Every 5 days IOP was measured and the NB in the ONH and IOP were measured before treatment and 2 hours after the last instillation on the 20th day. After a single instillation of timolol, PR showed a maximum reduction of 12% and IOP in the timolol-treated eyes showed a maximum decrease in 25%. NB in the ONH and BP did not show any significant change during the experiment. After a 20-day treatment with timolol, IOP showed a maximum decrease of 25% in the timolol-treated eyes and 16% in the vehicle-treated eyes. The NB in the timolol-treated eyes increased significantly by 16% (P < 0.01), whereas that in the vehicle-treated eyes showed no significant change. It was suggested that long-term topical timolol with a normal drug regimen caused a significant increase in the peripheral blood velocity in the ONH only in the timolol-treated eyes, at least partly, by local penetration of the drug. Ocular penetration of topically applied timolol is thought to be similar between rabbit and human eyes. Therefore, the present results may have clinical implications.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1994

Influence of drug release rate on systemic timolol absorption from polymeric ocular inserts in the pigmented rabbit.

There is an expectation that ocular inserts, regardless of the nature of the polymer, will faithfully reduce systemic drug absorption. This may not necessarily be so, however, since not all polymers would release drug at the same rate and to the same extent. The objective of the present study was to determine how drug release rate from various polymeric ocular inserts may influence systemic timolol absorption in the pigmented rabbit. The inserts tested were made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), or partial ethyl ester of poly(vinyl methyl ether/maleic anhydride) (PVMMA), approximately 89.4% w/w in all cases. Some polyvinyl alcohol inserts contained timolol in salt form with Carbopol 940 (PVA-C940), 8.6% w/w. The time course of timolol in plasma over 6 hr was monitored using reversed phase HPLC. While all inserts reduced the peak timolol concentration in plasma (Cmax), only the PVA and HPC inserts, which released timolol rapidly in vitro, reduced the extent of systemic timolol absorption (AUC). On the other hand, both PVA-C940 and PVMMA inserts, which released timolol relatively slowly in vitro, increased the extent of systemic timolol absorption. Moreover, the time at which peak timolol concentration was achieved in the plasma was much delayed, raising the possibility of delayed timolol absorption until discharge of the presumably viscous and/or mucoadhesive solutions of PVA-C940 and PVMMA inserts into the nasal cavity. It may be concluded that not all polymeric ocular inserts reduce systemic timolol absorption. Whether an insert would do so depends on the interplay of residence time in the conjunctival sac and rate of drug release from the insert.

Absorption↗
PubMed1978

Glaucoma treatment with timolol.

Thirty-two eyes from 19 patients with either capsular glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma or primary open angle glaucoma were given topical timolol and followed through a 3--6 months period. Twelve eyes were previously out of control on full medication including pilocarpine, epinephrine and acetazolamide. Eight of these eyes could be adequately controlled throughout the follow-up period on topical timolol or a combination of timolol and pilocarpine, but without resorting to acetazolamide. One eye needed acetazolamide in combination with timolol, and three eyes had to be referred to surgery. Twelve eyes were adequately controlled either on pilocarpine or full medication, but could be equally well controlled on timolol alone, or timolol and pilocarpine in combination. Acetazolamide could be withheld from all of the six patients who used this drug. Eight eyes were previously untreated. They could all be adequately controlled either on timolol (5 eyes) or timolol and pilocarpine (3 eyes). The study indicates that the effect of timolol 0.5% X 2 may be stronger than the combined effect of epinephrine 1% X 2 and acetazolamide 500 mg a day. Topical timolol was well tolerated. No side reactions occurred and the pupillary size and reactions were not influenced by the timolol treatment.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Diversity of response of optic nerve head circulation to timolol maleate in gel-forming solution.

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was conducted to investigate the effects of 0.5% timolol maleate in gel-forming solution on intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood circulation in the optic nerve head in patients with untreated ocular hypertension. METHODS: The effects of 0.5% timolol in gel-forming solution on IOP and optic nerve head capillary blood speed were studied in 12 patients with untreated ocular hypertension. Optic nerve capillary blood speed was measured using the laser Doppler technique before and at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: In each patient, IOP decreased after treatment with timolol (mean decrease 16.8% versus placebo). Systemic blood pressure and pulse rate did not differ significantly after treatment with topical timolol from values after placebo. The mean change from baseline in Doppler broadening was 10.6% greater after treatment with timolol than after placebo. There was no significant change in mean Doppler broadening from baseline after treatment with either timolol or placebo. However, optic nerve head capillary blood speed increased in six patients, and was within the range of placebo response in six patients after treatment with timolol. Spearman correlation analysis of the baseline with Doppler broadening measurements after treatment showed a correlation for placebo but not for timolol. The percent change in Doppler broadening after timolol treatment was correlated with iris color. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that administration of timolol for 4 weeks reduces IOP in patients with ocular hypertension and generally does not change the blood circulation in the optic nerve head. Individual patients, however, showed variable changes in optic nerve head circulation after topical administration of timolol. Although the sample size was small, these changes in optic nerve head circulation were correlated with iris color.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stereospecific binding of timolol, a beta-adrenergic blocking agent.

The beta-adrenergic blocking agent, timolol, appears to be bound to stereospecific as well as nonspecific sites in the particulate fraction (8500g pellet) of the heart, lungs, and brain, whereas the d-isomer of timolol was bound to nonspecific sites only. Timolol disappeared from the particulate fraction at a slower rate than did its optical isomer. At 1 hr after a 0.1-mg/kg dose, the concentration of the l-form in the lung was 1.8 times that of the d-isomer and at 3 and 4 hr the difference was at least 33-fold. The concentration of 14C-timolol in the particulate fraction of rat tissues was inhibited by iv administered timolol and by the l-isomer of propanolol, but not by their corresponding d-forms. Competition for binding sites was dose dependent. Pretreatment with timolol at 0.1 and 5.0 mg/kg reduced the binding of 14C-timolol (dose, 0.1 mg/kg) to lung tissue by 41% and 86%, respectively. In the heart and lung tissue of rats, racemic timolol, propranolol, bunolol, and bunitrolol were approximately equally effective in competing for the binding sites of 14C-timolol. Practolol and sotalol and the beta 2-selective agent butoxamine did not significantly inhibit the binding of 14C-timolol. Similar competition was also observed in the whole brain of rats. This report suggests that the stereospecific binding of timolol may be related to the beta-adrenoreceptor process.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Plasma kinetics and antagonist activity of topical ocular timolol in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Systemic adverse effects of ocular timolol therapy are due to absorption of the drug from the eye into the systemic circulation. Elderly patients are frequently more susceptible to side effects than younger patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the plasma kinetics and antagonist activity of ocular timolol in elderly patients. METHODS: Plasma kinetics and antagonist activity of timolol were studied in 12 patients scheduled for extracapsular cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. The patients received 40 microliters of 0.25% timolol into the lower cul-de-sacs of each eye. Blood samples were collected over a period of 12 h and plasma concentrations of timolol were analyzed using a radioreceptor assay. The corresponding ex vivo beta 1- and beta 2-receptor occupancies were calculated using radioligand binding techniques. RESULTS: Timolol was absorbed rapidly into the systemic circulation and occupied on average up to 68% of beta 1-receptors and up to 87% of beta 2-receptors. The beta 1- and beta 2-receptor occupancy decreased slowly and was on average 38% and 64%, respectively, 12 h after the single dose. The calculated mean area under concentration-time curve of timolol in plasma was 10.28 ng/ml per hour and the mean half-life was 4.8 h. Both values were about twice as high as those found in healthy young volunteers following an intravenous 0.25-mg dose of timolol. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients the beta-receptor antagonist effect of ocular timolol after a single dose is strong and long-lasting. This finding may explain the frequent reported systemic side effects of ophthalmic timolol.

Absorption↗
PubMed1996

How can the bioavailability of timolol be enhanced? A pharmacokinetic pilot study of novel hydrogels.

BACKGROUND: Carbomerbased hydrogels with timolol maleate (T-Gel) were chosen to study the vehicle effect on ocular bioavailability. Pharmacokinetic profiles of T-Gel 0.05% (0.05% timolol), T-Gel 0.025% (0.025% timolol) and commercial timolol ophthalmic solution (TOS 0.1%; 0.1% timolol) were determined and compared. METHODS: A single dose was administered to rabbits' eyes. Timolol was determined by HPLC in aqueous humour, blood samples and washings of the ocular surface (as a measure of residence time). Sampling times were 0.5 h, 1 h and 4 h after instillation. RESULTS: Concentration versus time curves (AUC) of timolol in aqueous humour demonstrate no significant differences between TOS 0.1% and T-Gel 0.025% (P = 0.19), whereas the difference between T-Gel 0.05% and TOS 0.1% is significant (P = 0.006); the AUC ratio of T-Gel 0.05%:TOS 0.1%:T-Gel 0.025% was 2.14:1:0.87. Timolol blood levels were highest with TOS 0.1% at every time point. Peak levels occurred after 0.5 h with all test products; the ratio of peak levels (Cmax) for T-Gel 0.05%:TOS 0.1%:T-Gel 0.025% was 0.55:1:0.17. Timolol was detected in the washings up to 1 h after instillation of test products; the highest levels were observed after T-Gel 0.05%. CONCLUSION: The new vehicle obviously improves the bioavailability of topically applied timolol.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2002

Systemic bioavailability and cardiopulmonary effects of 0.5% timolol eyedrops.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the pharmacological basis of systemic side effects of ophthalmic timolol, we estimated the systemic bioavailability of 0.5% timolol eyedrops and compared cardiopulmonary effects of intravenous and ophthalmic timolol. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study we administered 0.2 mg timolol either intravenously or ocularly to eight healthy volunteers. After drug administration we measured heart rate, arterial blood pressure, forced expiratory volume in 1s, forced vital capacity, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Plasma timolol concentrations were determined using a beta-adrenoceptor binding assay. RESULTS: The peak concentration of ophthalmic timolol in plasma, (C(max)=1.14+/-0.34 ng/ml, mean+/-SD, n=8) was measured in most subjects within 15 min after drug administration. The mean area under the curve from zero to infinitum (AUC(0-)(infinity)) was 6.46+/-2.49 ng/ml per hour after intravenous and 4.78+/-1.90 ng/ml per hour (means+/-SD, n=8) after ocular administration. The systemic bioavailability (F) of the eyedrop was 78.0+/-24.5% (mean+/-SD, n=8). Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and pulmonary functions were similar after intravenous and ocular timolol administration, whereas IOP was lowered more effectively by the ophthalmic than the intravenous dose. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic timolol resembled intravenous timolol in terms of systemic bioavailability, plasma kinetics, and cardiopulmonary effects. Clinicians should pay attention to the high systemic bioavailability of ophthalmic timolol, because intensive systemic beta-blockade can be highly hazardous to aged patients suffering from cardiopulmonary diseases.

Absorption↗
PubMed1986

Effect of timolol on mortality and reinfarction after acute myocardial infarction: prognostic importance of heart rate at rest.

Long-term timolol treatment after acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant reduction in mortality and nonfatal reinfarction. To evaluate whether the reduction in mortality and morbidity is exclusively or partly dependent on a reduction in heart rate (HR), cardiac events in the Norwegian Timolol Multicenter Study were analyzed according to resting HR at baseline and at 1 month of follow-up Resting HR at baseline was a significant predictor of total death and all events (total death plus nonfatal reinfarction) both in placebo- and in timolol-treated patients. In the placebo group the median resting HR was unchanged from baseline to 1 month control (72 beats/min), but was reduced from 72 beats/min to 56 beats/min in the timolol group. Resting HR during follow-up remained a significant predictor of total death. Further, mortality at a given HR during treatment was not markedly different whether the HR was spontaneous or caused by timolol. Timolol treatment was related to a significant reduction in mortality, and this study suggests that the major effect of timolol treatment on mortality after acute myocardial infarction may be attributed to the reduction in HR. Timolol treatment was also associated with an overall reduction in nonfatal reinfarction. However, nonfatal reinfarction was inversely related to resting HR during follow-up, indicating that although coronary artery occlusion in low-risk patients may cause nonfatal reinfarction, the outcome in high-risk patients is more likely to be death. When analyzing mortality and nonfatal reinfarction combined, timolol treatment was related to a reduction in cardiac events at any given HR, suggesting that factors in addition to HR reduction are important in the protective effects of timolol.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

NMR analysis of ion pair formation between timolol and sorbic acid in ophthalmic preparations.

Ion pair formation between timolol and sorbic acid was investigated using NMR spectroscopy in order to clarify their interactions within ophthalmic preparation. (13)C and (1)H NMR spectra of timolol, sorbic acid, and a mixture of the two were obtained, and the signal changes induced by pairing were observed. The carbon signals of the butylaminopropanol moiety of timolol were markedly shifted in the mixture, as were the carboxyl and conjugated carbons assigned to sorbic acid. The localizations of the changes in each molecule revealed the binding sites. The profiles of butylaminopropanol carbon chemical shifts plotted against a molar ratio of sorbate were synchronized, which suggested a single type of interaction with sorbic acid. The Job plot showed a typical pattern with a single-maximum at a mole function of 0.5, indicating the presence of a 1:1 complex of timolol and sorbic acid. The stability constants (K) of the timolol-sorbate and timolol-maleate pairs were 1.9x10(1) and 2.2x10(2)M(-1), respectively. The higher K value of the timolol-maleate interaction suggested that it was dominant to the timolol-sorbate interaction when maleate and sorbate coexisted within a timolol solution. Here, we demonstrated evidence of an interaction between timolol and sorbic acid using simple NMR measurements, which suggested the existence of ion pair formation derived from charge neutralization. Our analysis using NMR spectroscopy should advance the understanding and optimization of formulations that are based on ion pair.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2006

Intraocular pressure-lowering effect of adding dorzolamide or latanoprost to timolol: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of 2% dorzolamide or 0.005% latanoprost when added to 0.5% timolol. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen articles reporting on 19 study arms with 5 possible treatment combinations and 4 study arms serving as controls. METHODS: Articles written in English, German, French, or Dutch and published up to December 2004 were identified in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and references from relevant articles. For the article to be considered, over 85% of the patients had to have primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The pooled 1- to 3-month additional IOP-lowering effect after a run-in phase on timolol was calculated by performing meta-analysis using the random effects model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute and relative changes in IOP after run-in on timolol for peak moment, trough moment, or mean diurnal curve. RESULTS: The pooled change from baseline [mean (95% confidence interval)] for 0.5% timolol varied from -0.7 mmHg (-1.2 to -0.2, for the mean diurnal curve) to -2.0 mmHg (-1.3 to -2.7, at peak). Pooled changes for 2% dorzolamide in concomitant use with 0.5% timolol were -4.1 mmHg (-4.4 to -3.8) at trough and -4.9 mmHg (-5.3 to -4.5) at peak. The fixed 2% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol combination resulted in a pooled change of -3.8 mmHg (-4.2 to -3.4) at trough and -4.9 mmHg (-5.3 to -4.5) at peak. The concomitant use of 0.005% latanoprost and 0.5% timolol gave a pooled change from baseline of -6.0 mmHg (-6.8 to -5.2) at the mean diurnal curve. The fixed combination of 0.005% latanoprost and 0.5% timolol resulted in a mean change of -3.0 mmHg (-3.8 to -2.2) at the mean diurnal curve. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of clinical trials, the addition of dorzolamide or latanoprost further lowers IOP in eyes on timolol. This result may not be generalizable because these trials may have included nonresponders to timolol.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2004

Two-year double-masked comparison of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

The object of this study was to compare the long term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In a 12-month extension of two identically designed 1-year, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trials, patients were treated topically with bimatoprost 0.03% QD (n=167), bimatoprost 0.03% BID (n=131), or timolol 0.5% BID (n=81). Main outcome measures were IOP at 8 am and 10 am and safety parameters. Bimatoprost QD provided significantly greater mean reduction from baseline IOP than did timolol at both measurements at each study visit (P< or =.001). At 10 am (peak timolol effect) at month 24, the mean reduction from baseline IOP was 7.8 mm Hg with bimatoprost QD and 4.6 mm Hg with timolol (P<.001). Patients treated with bimatoprost QD also sustained significantly lower mean IOP than timolol-treated patients at every follow-up visit throughout the 2-year study period (P< or =.006). At 10 am at month 24, a significantly greater proportion of bimatoprost QD than timolol patients achieved target pressures of < or =13-18 mm Hg (P< or =.010). Bimatoprost sustained an excellent safety profile during the second year of treatment. Most adverse events were mild, and there were no reports of increased iris pigmentation, uveitis, or CME. The incidence of hyperemia was significantly higher with bimatoprost QD (13.8%) than with timolol (2.5%) (P=.006). Mean reduction from baseline IOP with bimatoprost BID was not significantly different from that with timolol at month 24 at 10 am (P=.474). We conclude that bimatoprost QD provides superior IOP lowering to timolol, and is safe and well tolerated over 24 months of treatment.

Amides↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% with timolol 0.5% in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month, masked, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of once-daily travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) to twice-daily timolol 0.5%. DESIGN: Prospective, 6-month, randomized, controlled, multicenter, double-masked, phase III study. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred five patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with an 8 AM IOP between 24 to 36 mmHg in at least one eye (the same eye) at two eligibility visits received either travoprost 0.0015%, travoprost 0.004% (dosed every day), or timolol 0.5% (dosed twice daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean IOP at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM in the patient's eye with the higher baseline IOP. RESULTS: The mean IOP was significantly lower for both concentrations of travoprost compared with timolol. Travoprost was statistically superior to timolol at 9 of 13 visits, with differences in IOP reductions ranging from 0.9 to 1.8 mmHg (0.0015%) and 10 of 13 visits with differences in IOP reductions from 0.9 to 2.4 mmHg (0.004%). Mean IOP changes from baseline ranged from -6.0 to -7.5 mmHg (0.0015%), -6.5 to -8.0 mmHg (0.004%), and -5.2 to -7.0 mmHg for timolol. Hyperemia was experienced at rates of 29.2% (59 of 202) for travoprost 0.0015%, 42.8% (86 of 201) for travoprost 0.004%, and 8.9% (18 of 202) for timolol. Iris pigmentation changes were observed in 1.0% (2 of 200) of patients receiving travoprost 0.004% with no changes noted in the travoprost 0.0015% group or the timolol group. A decrease in pulse and systolic blood pressure was observed in the timolol group. There were no other clinically relevant or statistically significant changes from baseline in ocular signs or laboratory values, and no serious, related, unexpected adverse events were reported for any group. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%), dosed once daily in the evening, is statistically superior or equal to timolol 0.5% dosed twice daily at all treatment visits during this 6-month study. IOP reductions of up to 2.0 mmHg greater than timolol were found in the travoprost 0.004% pooled data group. Travoprost is safe and well tolerated in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Dorzolamide/timolol combination versus concomitant administration of brimonidine and timolol: six-month comparison of efficacy and tolerability.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol combination ophthalmic solution twice daily to the concomitant administration of 0.2% brimonidine ophthalmic solution twice daily and 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution twice daily. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, observer-masked, parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety-three patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma participated. INTERVENTION: After an open-label 3-week 0.5% timolol run-in period, patients with an hour 2 intraocular pressure (IOP) of > or = 22 mmHg were randomly assigned to receive either the dorzolamide/timolol combination twice daily or the concomitant use of brimonidine twice daily and timolol twice daily (brimonidine + timolol) for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The IOP-lowering effects at hour 0 and hour 2 were collected at 1, 3, and 6 months. We hypothesized that both treatment regimens would have comparable hour 2 IOP-lowering effects at month 3. The treatments were considered comparable if the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the treatment difference was within +/- 1.5 mmHg. Tolerability data were also collected at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis was based on the modified intent-to-treat population. At month 3, hour 2, the dorzolamide/timolol group had an adjusted mean (standard error) change in IOP of -5.04 (0.30) mmHg versus -5.41 (0.30) mmHg in the brimonidine + timolol group, with a treatment difference of 0.36 (0.40) mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] of -0.42-1.14 mmHg). At month 3, hour 0, the dorzolamide/timolol group had a change in IOP of -3.66 (0.29) mmHg versus -4.15 (0.28) mmHg in the brimonidine + timolol group, with a treatment difference of 0.49 (0.39) mmHg (95% CI of -0.27-1.25 mmHg). Likewise, at all other observed time points, the 95% confidence interval of the treatment difference was within +/- 1.5 mmHg. Ninety-three patients (64%) in the dorzolamide/timolol group and 88 patients (60%) in the brimonidine + timolol group had adverse experiences that were deemed drug related by the investigator, for which 7 patients (5%) in the dorzolamide/timolol group and 8 patients (5%) in the brimonidine + timolol group were discontinued from the study. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the dorzolamide/timolol combination and the concomitant administration of brimonidine and timolol were comparable. The incidence of drug-related adverse experiences and the incidence of discontinuations caused by drug-related adverse experiences were similar between groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A 12-month, randomized, double-masked study comparing latanoprost with timolol in pigmentary glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects and the effect on aqueous humor dynamics of 0.005% latanoprost applied topically once daily with 0.5% timolol given twice daily for 12 months to patients with pigmentary glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six patients affected with bilateral pigmentary glaucoma controlled with no more than a single hypotensive medication were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTION: The sample population was randomly divided into 2 age- and gender-matched groups each of 18 patients. Group 1 received 0.005% latanoprost eyedrops once daily and the vehicle (placebo) once daily; group 2 was assigned to timolol 0.5% eyedrops twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diurnal curves of intraocular pressure (IOP) were performed on the baseline day and after 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. The IOP measurements were performed at 8:00 AM, 12:00 noon, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. Outflow facility ("C") was measured on the baseline day and on the last day of the study with a Schiotz electronic tonometer. A two-tailed Student's t test for paired or unpaired data was used for statistical evaluation of differences between treatment and baseline values or between the latanoprost and timolol group. Diurnal IOP measurements were compared hour by hour. Mean values of the two eyes IOP and "C" were used for analysis. RESULTS: Compared with baseline measurements, both latanoprost and timolol caused a significant (P < 0.001) reduction of IOP at each hour of diurnal curve throughout the duration of therapy. Reduction of IOP was 6.0 +/- 4.5 and 5.9 +/- 4.6 with latanoprost and 4.8 +/- 3.0 and 4.6 +/- 3.1 with timolol after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Comparison of mean diurnal measurements with latanoprost and timolol showed a statistical significant (P < 0.001) difference at 3, 6, and 12 months. Mean "C" was found to be significantly enhanced (+30%) only in the latanoprost-treated group compared with the baseline (P = 0.017). Mean conjunctival hyperemia was graded at 0.3 in latanoprost-treated eyes and 0.2 in timolol-treated eyes. A remarkable change in iris color was observed in both eyes of 1 of the 18 patients treated with latanoprost and none of the 18 patients who received timolol. Darkening of the peripheral iris stroma was suspected in two patients treated with latanoprost. In the timolol group, heart rate was significantly reduced from 72 +/- 9 at baseline to 67 +/- 10 beats per minute at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies may need to confirm these data on a larger sample and to evaluate the side effect of increased iris pigmentation on long-term follow-up, in patients with pigmentary glaucoma, 0.005% latanoprost taken once daily was well tolerated and more effective in reducing IOP than 0.5% timolol taken twice daily.

Administration, Topical↗