On the mechanism of radioprotection by cysteine and cysteamine: ESR studies of irradiated binary and ternary systems of DNA and TMP.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for prophylaxis of urinary tract infection in persons with recent spinal cord injury, during the first 4 months of intermittent catheterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine adults (112 men, 17 women) with recent acute spinal cord injury participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and were studied for up to 16 weeks. Low-dose TMP-SMX (TMP 40 mg, SMX 200 mg) or placebo was given once daily. Clinical observations, urine cultures, and cultures of rectal and urethral swabs were made weekly. Subjects who developed breakthrough bacteriuria received conventional antimicrobial therapy and prophylaxis was continued. RESULTS: Sixty-six TMP-SMX recipients (57 men, 9 women) and 60 placebo recipients (52 men, 8 women) are evaluable for efficacy. Among male subjects, bacteriuria was present during 50% or more of study weeks in 30% of TMP-SMX recipients and in 56% of placebo recipients (p = 0.003). The interval to the onset of bacteriuria was prolonged in TMP-SMX recipients (p < 0.0001). TMP-SMX recipients without bacteriuria in any given week had a lower probability of having bacteriuria the subsequent week (0.26) than did placebo recipients (0.49) (p < 0.0001). At least 1 episode of definite symptomatic bacteriuria (bacteriuria and fever and at least 1 classical manifestation of urinary infection) occurred in 4 of 57 TMP-SMX-treated men and in 18 of 52 placebo-treated men (p < 0.0003). We observed similar trends in women, but differences did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because the number of females was small. Adverse events suspected to be due to medications were frequent in this population of patients with recent severe injuries and led to discontinuation of the study in 10% of the TMP-SMX group and 8% of the placebo group. Adverse events included neutropenia (TMP-SMX: two; placebo: three), pseudomembranous colitis (TMP-SMX: one), severe skin rash (TMP-SMX: two; placebo: one), and drug fever (TMP-SMX: one). The proportion of all episodes of bacteriuria that were due to TMP-SMX-resistant organisms was unexpectedly high in the placebo group (51%), and increased progressively according to year of enrollment in the study. By Year 3, all subjects in the placebo group had at least one episode of TMP-SMX-resistant bacteriuria. Gram-negative enteric bacilli resistant to TMP-SMX were recovered from rectal swabs (TMP-SMX 49%, placebo 42%) and urethral swabs (TMP-SMX 33%, placebo 26%) in similar proportions of subjects in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with TMP-SMX significantly reduces bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infection in persons with recent acute spinal cord injury during bladder retraining using intermittent catheterization. However, adverse reactions attributable to TMP-SMX are common in this population. Colonization and breakthrough bacteriuria with TMP-SMX-resistant organisms are frequent and may seriously limit the usefulness of this strategy, particularly in an institutional setting.
To investigate whether 10 days of rifampin-trimethoprim (RIF-TMP) or 6 weeks of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) would decrease the relapse rate in patients with acute uncomplicated upper urinary tract infections in comparison with 10 days of SMX-TMP, we randomized 189 patients to receive RIF-TMP or SMX-TMP in a ratio of 1:2. After the site of infection was established by the antibody-coated bacterium (ACB) test, patients with upper-tract infections who received SMX-TMP were again randomized and received either a total of 6 weeks or 10 days of therapy. All patients who received RIF-TMP were treated for 10 days. Clinical and microbiological evaluations were repeated at 2 and 6 weeks posttreatment. Eighty-five patients (54 ACB positive) received 10 days of RIF-TMP, 71 patients (45 ACB positive) received 10 days of SMX-TMP, and 18 patients (18 ACB positive) received 6 weeks of SMX-TMP. The overall recurrence rates in patients who received 10 days of therapy were 32% for RIF-TMP and 23% for SMX-TMP (P = 0.13). There were 12 (14%) relapses in the RIF-TMP group compared with 2 (3%) relapses in the SMX-TMP group (P = 0.01). In patients with upper-tract infections, the relapse rates were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.13). There were two (11%) recurrences (one relapse and one reinfection) in the 6-week treatment group. This 6% relapse rate was not different from the 4% relapse rate observed in patients with upper-tract infections who received 10 days of SMX-TMP. The number of patients who discontinued treatment because of an adverse effect in the 6-week SMX-TMP treatment group was significantly greater than those in the 10-day SMX-TMP treatment group (P=0.003) and the RIF-TMP treatment group (P=0.05). Ten days of SMX-TMP was as effective as 6 weeks of SMP-TMP or 10 days of RIF-TMP in the treatment of uncomplicated upper urinary tract infections and caused the fewest untoward effects.
To assess the renal benefits of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium antagonism, we studied the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of temocapril (TMP) alone or in combination with azelnidipine (AZN) in a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) remnant kidney model of chronic renal failure. Male 5/6-nephrectomized SHR/Izumo rats were randomly assigned to receive vehicle (control group), TMP (TMP group; 10 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)), AZN (AZN group; 3 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)), or both (TMP+AZN group) orally for 12 weeks. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urinary excretion of albumin (UalbV) were measured every 2 weeks. At the end of the experiment, serum creatinine (Scr), heart weight (HW), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were measured and the remnant kidneys were examined to determine the index of glomerular sclerosis (IGS). SBP and UalbV in the control group increased progressively throughout the experimental period. TMP, AZN, and TMP+AZN blocked the development of hypertension. TMP+AZN did not enhance the antihypertensive effects of either TMP or AZN used singly. TMP, AZN, and TMP+AZN all significantly decreased the UalbV, Scr, BUN, and HW/body weight (BW) ratio. The level of UalbV and the HW/BW ratio in the TMP+AZN group were significantly lower than those in the TMP and AZN groups, and the level of Scr in the TMP+AZN group was significantly lower than that in the TMP group. TMP, AZN, and TMP+AZN all significantly protected against an increase in the IGS. The IGS in the TMP+AZN group was significantly lower than that in the TMP and AZN groups. These results indicate that both TMP and AZN have antihypertensive and renoprotective effects in this model. They also suggest that simultaneous administration of TMP and AZN provides greater renoprotective effects than TMP alone.
To assess the renal benefits of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonism, we studied the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of temocapril (TMP) alone and in combination with doxazosin (DOX) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR)/Izumo rats with renal ablation. Five-Sixths-nephrectomized rats were assigned to receive TMP (10 mg/kg/day) (TMP group), TMP plus DOX (2 mg/kg/day) (TMP+DOX group), or vehicle (control group) orally for 12 weeks. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urinary excretion of albumin (UalbV) in the control group progressively increased during the experimental period and were significantly higher than in sham-operated rats. Treatment with either TMP or TMP plus DOX had similar antihypertensive effects in this rat model. Twelve weeks after initiation of treatment, the SBP values in the control, TMP, and TMP+DOX groups were 265+/-8, 157+/-4, and 163+/-3 mmHg, respectively, in comparison with 233+/-4 mmHg in sham-operated rats (p<0.0001 control vs. sham, p<0.001 TMP vs. control, p<0.001 TMP+DOX vs. control). UalbV, serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and heart weight/body weight (HW/BW) ratio were significantly lower in the TMP and TMP+DOX groups than in the control group (UalbV: p<0.05; Scr: p<0.01; [BUN, HW/BW ratio]: p<0.0001; and [UalbV, Scr, BUN, HW/BW ratio]: p<0.0001 vs. control, respectively). The index of glomerular sclerosis (IGS) and relative interstitial volume (RIV) were significantly lower in the TMP+DOX group than in the control group (IGS: p<0.05; RIV: p<0.01). Especially, UalbV, IGS, and RIV were significantly better in the TMP+DOX group than in the TMP group ([IGS, RIV]: p<0.05; UalbV: p<0.01). These results suggest that simultaneous administration of TMP and DOX provides greater renoprotective effects than administration of TMP alone.
Because of the widespread occurrence of resistance to sulfonamides among Enterobacteriaceae, some researchers have suggested using trimethoprim (TMP) alone instead of the combination sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) in treating infections with TMP-susceptible organisms. To answer whether SMX-TMP suppresses the emergence of resistant organisms compared with TMP alone, quantitative fecal cultures were made for total and TMP-resistant organisms before, during, and after SMX-TMP (800/160 mg twice a day) or TMP (200 or 100 mg twice a day) was given to 48 patients for 4 weeks in a prospective, randomized study. All three regimens left anaerobes intact and reduced the total aerobic coliform fecal flora by approximately 4 logs throughout the 4-week treatment period. In 11 of 19 (58%) patients taking TMP 200 mg twice daily, TMP-resistant organisms emerged or increased during therapy (P less than 0.01, compared with none of the 12 controls), whereas in only 4 of 18 (22%) patients on SMX-TMP did TMP-resistant organisms increase. These TMP-resistant organisms increased by less than 1 log and were predominantly Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. In only one instance did an SMX-TMP-resistant Escherichia coli strain emerge after 4 weeks of SMX-TMP therapy. The slight increase in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species seen with TMP alone in this study raises a potential risk of giving TMP alone in settings where these organisms may cause serious infections, as in immunosuppressed patients.