Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Systolic Dysfunction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Is left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients with heart failure normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy?

The critical left ventricular (LV) mass when hypertensive heart failure appears, and whether LV dysfunction in hypertensives with heart failure is normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy were investigated. LV dimension, LV mass, LV mass index, LV ejection time (LVET) and pre-ejection period (PEP) were measured in 27 normal subjects and 56 essential hypertensives, the latter divided into three groups: group I, without LV hypertrophy; group II, with LV hypertrophy; and group III, with hypertensive heart failure. LV mass and LV mass index were 135.0 +/- 23.8 g and 85.8 +/- 11.7 g/m2, respectively, in normal controls, 133.0 +/- 30.8 g and 82.0 +/- 18.4 g/m2 in group I, 222.3 +/- 38.0 g and 136.1 +/- 19.9 g/m2 in group II, and 422.0 +/- 30.3 g and 235.7 +/- 19.6 g/m2 in group III of essential hypertensives. The upper limits of LV mass and LV mass index in group II (mean + 2SD) were about 300 g and 180 g/m2, respectively. Significant shortening of LVET was observed only in group III, but PEP was prolonged with an increase in LV mass. LV diastolic dimension and PEP were not normalized by long-term antihypertensive therapy (mean: 16 months). These results indicate that the critical LV mass marking the transition from non-failing hypertrophied left ventricle to failing ventricle associated with essential hypertension is about 300 g, or LV mass index of 180 g/m2, and that LV dilatation and depressed myocardial contractility in essential hypertensives with a past history of congestive heart failure were not normalized by chronic antihypertensive therapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Management of heart failure. IV. Anticoagulation for patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the incidence of arterial thromboembolism in patients with heart failure who are not receiving anticoagulants. We also examine whether more severe ventricular dysfunction increases this incidence and the efficacy and risks of anticoagulation for patients in sinus rhythm. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies referenced in MEDLINE or EMBASE (January 1966 to September 1993) were reviewed. We used the search terms heart failure, congestive; congestive heart failure; heart failure; cardiac failure; and dilated cardiomyopathy in conjunction with the terms anticoagulation, cerebrovascular disorders, stroke, and thromboembolism. STUDY SELECTION: All studies with separate data for patients with chronic heart failure not receiving anticoagulants were included. Articles addressing valvular heart disease or heart failure secondary to acute myocardial infarction or Chagas' disease were excluded. Studies of the occurrence of left ventricular mural thrombi were also reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria, prevalence of atrial fibrillation, mean follow-up, and the occurrence of arterial thromboembolic events were extracted. If the incidence was not given, this was estimated using the proportion of patients with events divided by the mean follow-up. CONCLUSION: The incidence of arterial thromboembolism ranged from 0.9 to 5.5 events per 100 patient-years, with the largest studies reporting incidence of 2.0% and 2.4%. Findings regarding the relationship between ventricular function and thromboembolic events are contradictory. No controlled trial has assessed the efficacy or risks of anticoagulation for patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm, and reported efficacy in case series ranged from 0% to 100%. Until adequate studies are performed, anticoagulation should be discouraged for patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Exercise testing and training of patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Reducing the exercise intolerance and symptoms experienced by patients with chronic heart failure remains an important focus in their clinical care. A clear shortcoming exists; however, with respect to an appreciation that in addition to standard medical therapy, selected patients with stable heart failure also can benefit from a moderate exercise training program. Improvements in central transport, regional blood flow, and skeletal muscle histology and biochemistry all likely account for the increase in exercise capacity and delay in fatigue that these patients experience. Additionally, the autonomic imbalance that is characteristic of these patients is improved. Although the number of patients with heart failure participating in an exercise program is increasing, much work still exists relative to incorporating this treatment method into the care plans established by physicians and physician extenders.

Exercise Test↗
PubMed1990

Left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired diastolic filling in essential hypertension. Diastolic mechanisms for systolic dysfunction during exercise.

Left ventricular ejection fraction is normal at rest but may respond abnormally to exercise in many patients with essential hypertension. To assess the determinants of the abnormal ejection fraction response to exercise, we performed radionuclide angiography at rest and during exercise in 41 hypertensive patients without coronary artery disease. In 22 patients (group 1), the ejection fraction increased more than 5% during exercise; in the other 19 patients (group 2), the ejection fraction either increased by less than 5% or decreased with exercise. Left ventricular diastolic filling was impaired at rest in patients in group 2 compared with group 1, with reduced peak filling rate (2.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.7 end-diastolic volume/sec; p less than 0.01) and prolonged time to peak filling rate (175 +/- 28 vs. 153 +/- 22 msec; p less than 0.01). Impaired diastolic filling in group 2 was associated with less augmentation in end-diastolic volume during exercise compared with group 1 (p less than 0.01). These observations were not dependent on the threshold value that was arbitrarily chosen to define an abnormal ejection fraction response, as there were significant correlations for the entire group between the magnitude of change in ejection fraction with exercise and both the resting peak filling rate (r = 0.46) and the change in end-diastolic volume with exercise (r = 0.62).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiomegaly↗
PubMed1997

A case of dilated cardiomyopathy with abnormal atrioventricular conduction 5 years before the appearance of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

The first manifestation of dilated cardiomyopathy is usually dyspnea as a result of left heart failure. In this report we describe an unusual patient with third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block unaccompanied by left ventricular dysfunction. Severe left ventricular dysfunction occurred 5 years after the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. We conclude that AV block should not be overlooked as an initial clinical manifestation of dilated cardiomyopathy.

Adult↗