SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulindac”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Apoptosis primarily accounts for the growth-inhibitory properties of sulindac metabolites and involves a mechanism that is independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition, cell cycle arrest, and p53 induction.

Sulindac causes regression of and prevents recurrence of colonic adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although cell cycle arrest and apoptosis have been proposed, the mechanism of action is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the growth-inhibitory effects of active metabolites of sulindac in cultured colon adenocarcinoma cells by determining the contribution of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and the requirement for cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and p53 involvement and compared the effects of sulindac metabolites with the chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Time course and dose-response experiments demonstrated that increased apoptosis paralleled the growth-inhibitory effects of the sulfide and sulfone. A relationship among a series of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was observed between potency for growth inhibition and ability to induce apoptosis but not potency to inhibit COX. For example, the sulfone was at least 5000-fold less potent than the sulfide for inhibiting COX but only 6.5-fold less potent for inducing apoptosis. Moreover, the prostaglandin analogue, dimethyl-prostaglandin E2, failed to reverse the apoptosis-inducing effects of the sulfide. Sulindac metabolites caused G1 cell cycle arrest in proliferating cells but were comparably effective in nonproliferating cells. In contrast, 5-FU treatment was less effective in nonproliferating cells. Combined treatment with sulindac metabolites and 5-FU did not result in an additive apoptotic response. Treatment of cells with 5-FU increased p53 protein levels, whereas sulindac metabolites did not induce expression. Saos-2 cells, which lack p53, responded to sulindac metabolites but not 5-FU. These results show that apoptosis primarily contributes to growth inhibition by sulindac metabolites. The biochemical pathway does not require COX inhibition or p53 induction and appears to be fundamentally different from the apoptotic response to 5-FU.

16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2↗

PubMed1998

The safety and efficacy of prolonged outpatient sulindac to prevent the recurrence of preterm labor: a prospective double-blind study.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of outpatient oral sulindac given until 34 weeks gestation to prevent the recurrence of preterm labor (PTL).Materials and Methods: Women were considered candidates for the study if they had an episode of preterm labor successfully treated with inpatient parenteral tocolysis, intact membranes, cervical dilatation <4 cm, and gestations <34 weeks. Candidates for the study were randomized by the pharmacy to receive either a "look-alike" placebo or sulindac, 100 mg po bid until 34 weeks gestation. The patient was seen for follow-up visits at 1 week and then every other week until 34 weeks. On follow-up visits hourly fetal urine production, amniotic fluid assessment, and ductal velocities were obtained.Results: Forty-four patients were randomized (21 sulindac and 23 placebo). All demographic and clinical variables were similar with the weeks at randomization 29.2 and 30.5 in the sulindac and placebo groups, respectively. Readmission for tocolysis occurred in 5 and 3 of the sulindac and placebo group patients, respectively (P = NS). Twenty and 22 of the sulindac and placebo group, respectively, delivered after 7 days. Amniotic fluid index in the sulindac group at 1 week was significantly lower than in the placebo group at 10.6 vs 13.0. All neonatal outcome variables were similar between the groups, including birth weights, Apgar, cord pH, and total NICU days.Conclusion: Sulindac until 34 weeks gestation following successful tocolysis results in no apparent prolongation of gestation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Growth-suppressive effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on 11 colon-cancer cell lines and fluorescence differential display of genes whose expression is influenced by sulindac.

In addition to an anti-inflammatory effect, sulindac, one of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has been shown to have a protective effect against the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, the molecular basis of its anti-proliferative function remains unclear. To investigate its molecular mechanism, we exposed 11 colon-cancer cell lines to NSAIDs such as aspirin, sulindac and the sulfide and sulfone metabolites of sulindac. Sensitivity to these drugs was dose- and time-dependent but varied from one cell line to another. Among the cell lines examined, sulindac showed a moderate anti-proliferative effect on HT-29 colon cancer cells and caused morphological changes, including an increase of cells with abnormal DNA content. We used the mRNA fluorescence differential display method with these cells to identify molecules that might contribute, through altered expression, to cellular changes in response to NSAIDs. Sixty-eight cDNA fragments were confirmed by RT-PCR to have significantly different expression levels following sulindac treatment. Thirty of these fragments proved to be novel cDNA sequences or identical to expressed sequence tags; the other 38 fragments were identical, or showed significant homology, to genes whose function was already known. Among the known genes differentially expressed in HT-29 cells after sulindac treatment were those encoding acetylglucosaminyltransferase, ferritin heavy chain, zinc finger protein 165, aldose reductase, carcinoembryonic antigen, aldoketoreductase, NF-kappaB-activating kinase, lysosome-associated protein, RhoE = 26 kDa GTPase homologue, NADH oxidoreductase, G/T mismatch bindingprotein, TM7SF3, ADP/ATP carrier-like protein and chromosome segregation protein. This variety among classes of proteins affected by sulindac in our experiments underscores the complexity of anti-proliferative mechanisms that may operate in colon-cancer cells treated with NSAIDs. Furthermore, identification of genes regulated by NSAIDs in colon-cancer cells should provide useful information to identify novel therapeutic targets for treatment and/or prevention of colon cancer.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2004

High-dose tamoxifen and sulindac as first-line treatment for desmoid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumors are mesenchymal nonmetastasizing neoplasms. Although rare in the general population, they are a common extracolonic manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because of high tumor recurrence rates, surgery has been less than satisfactory in the treatment of desmoid tumors. In the current study, high doses of tamoxifen in combination with sulindac were used to treat severe desmoid tumors to avoid surgery. METHODS: Since 1992, 25 patients at Heinrich Heine University (Dusseldorf, Germany) were treated with a combination of tamoxifen and sulindac. In the current study, 17 patients with FAP-associated and 8 patients with sporadic desmoid tumors received 120 mg of tamoxifen and 300 mg of sulindac daily. Every 6 months, the protracted course of desmoid growth was measured by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Tumor responses were characterized as progressive disease, stable disease (SD), partial regression (PR), and complete regression (CR). RESULTS: Of the group of patients who received tamoxifen and sulindac as a primary treatment, all three patients with sporadic desmoid tumors demonstrated cessation of growth, and 10 of the 13 patients with FAP-associated tumors achieved either a PR or CR. In the sporadic desmoid tumor group, eight of nine patients developed tumor recurrences after undergoing surgery at other institutions. Of these, two patients had SD and two patients had a PR to CR. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with desmoid tumors who were managed conservatively with high-dose tamoxifen and sulindac had the best outcome. Desmoid tumor recurrence after surgery was high and in the FAP-associated tumor group, therapy with tamoxifen and sulindac was found to be less successful. Based on this experience, the authors recommended high-dose tamoxifen and sulindac as the primary treatment for patients with FAP-associated desmoid tumors. However, to our knowledge, the best approach after surgical intervention for patients with sporadic desmoid tumors remains to be determined.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

PubMed1995

The effects of sulindac on colorectal proliferation and apoptosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The mechanism by which sulindac causes regression of adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is unclear. Conflicting data on the drug's effects on colorectal epithelial proliferation have been reported. An alternative mechanism, and one not previously studied, is via induction of colorectal epithelial cell apoptosis (programmed cell death). This hypothesis was tested by studying the effects of sulindac on colorectal epithelial proliferation and apoptosis in patients with FAP. METHODS: Cell proliferation was studied via immunohistochemistry for cell nuclear antigen in a group of 22 patients randomized to either sulindac (150 mg twice a day) or placebo in a previously published trial. The rectal epithelium from 7 additional patients with FAP treated with sulindac was examined by flow cytometry to assess changes in cell-cycle distribution and apoptosis. RESULTS: Although sulindac caused a significant decrease in polyp size and number, there was no significant change in cytokinetic variables or cell cycle distribution 3 months after treatment. However, the subdiploid apoptotic fraction was increased significantly 3 months after treatment with sulindac (31.3% +/- 4.8% compared with 10% +/- 4.3% at baseline; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that sulindac does not affect colorectal epithelial proliferation and that its effects in patients with FAP may instead result from induction of apoptosis.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1995

Outpatient oral sulindac to prevent recurrence of preterm labor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of oral sulindac in preventing the recurrence of preterm labor. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients between 24-34 weeks' gestation with preterm labor treated with intravenous magnesium sulfate. After successful tocolysis, patients were randomized by the pharmacy to receive either oral sulindac (200 mg) or placebo (once orally every 12 hours) for 7 days. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled (34 in the sulindac group, 35 controls). No significant differences were found with respect to time gained in utero (40 +/- 4.4 versus 31 +/- 3.4 days, P = .1), delivery at more than 35 weeks' gestation (20 versus 18, P = .70), recurrent preterm labor (11 versus 13, P = .88), birth weight (2528 +/- 646 versus 2459 +/- 707 g, P = .68), or time spent in the neonatal intensive care unit (4.2 +/- 12.9 versus 5.7 +/- 13.5 days, P = .63) for the sulindac and control groups, respectively. However, in women who failed therapy (ie, those who delivered before 37 weeks' gestation or required readmission for tocolysis), there was a significantly longer interval between the start of therapy and failure in the sulindac group (25.9 +/- 3.4 days, n = 26) than in the control group (15.2 +/- 2.8 days, n = 25; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The use of oral sulindac for 1 week after successful parenteral tocolysis failed to reduce the overall rate of preterm birth. In women who delivered prematurely or required readmission for tocolysis, oral sulindac significantly prolonged the interval from the start of therapy until delivery or readmission. Moreover, this benefit was achieved without observable adverse effects on the fetus.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1987

Analysis of sulindac and metabolites in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection is described for the quantification of sulindac, sulindac sulfone and sulindac sulfide in plasma and sulindac, trans-sulindac, sulindac sulfone and sulindac sulfide in urine. Plasma samples are de-proteinized with acetonitrile and urine samples are injected directly following enzymatic hydrolysis of glucuronide metabolites. The resulting chromatograms are essentially free from endogenous interference and the limits of detection are 0.1 microgram/ml for plasma and 0.2 microgram/ml for urine for all of the above compounds.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

PubMed2006

Sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, selectively inhibits interferon-gamma-induced expression of the chemokine CXCL9 gene in mouse macrophages.

Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been shown to exert an anti-tumor effect on several types of cancer. To determine the effect of sulindac on intracellular signaling pathways in host immune cells such as macrophages, we investigated the effect of the drug on interferon gamma (IFNgamma)-induced expression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and other genes in mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7 cells. Sulindac, but not aspirin or sodium salicylate, inhibited IFNgamma-induced expression of the CXC ligand 9 (CXCL9) mRNA, a chemokine for activated T cells, whereas the interferon-induced expression of CXCL10 or IFN regulatory factor-1 was not affected by sulindac. Luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that sulindac inhibited IFNgamma-induced promoter activity of the CXCL9 gene. Surprisingly, sulindac had no inhibitory effect on IFNgamma-induced STAT1 activation; however, constitutive nuclear factor kappaB activity was suppressed by the drug. These results indicate that sulindac selectively inhibited IFNgamma-inducible gene expression without inhibiting STAT1 activation.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Mechanisms of sulindac-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.

The mechanism underlying the chemopreventive effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac remains unclear. Its active metabolite, sulindac sulfide, induces cell cycle arrest as well as apoptosis in mammalian cell lines. We now show that in murine thymocytes, sulindac sulfide-induced cell death is p53, bax, Fas, and FasL independent. In contrast, bcl2 transgenic thymocytes are resistant to sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis. In addition, we demonstrate that sulindac sulfide-induced cell cycle arrest in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) is partly mediated by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) and the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21waf1/cip1. Furthermore, MEFs deficient in p21 or Rb are more susceptible to sulindac sulfide-induced cell death. These results suggest that sulindac may selectively target premalignant cells with cell cycle checkpoint deficits.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

The influence of sulindac on diabetic cardiomyopathy: a non-invasive evaluation by Doppler echocardiography in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the cardioprotective activity of sulindac as an aldose reductase inhibitor in the development of cardiomyopathy by non-invasive techniques; M-mode and Doppler echocardiography. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (45 mg/kg, iv) in the Sprague-Dawley rats. Echocardiography, biochemical and histological studies were carried out in normal control, diabetic untreated, diabetic vehicle (sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, 1%, po) and sulindac (6 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg, po) treated animals at varying time intervals. In the diabetic untreated and vehicle treated rats at 12 weeks after induction of diabetes, there was a significant decrease in the E-wave, an increase in the A-wave and corresponding decrease in the E/A ratio was observed. Significant decrease in the Eat was found after 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Whereas systolic function variables; ejection fraction and fractional shortening were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) after 12 weeks compared to their baseline data. In the sulindac treated animals, there were no significant alterations in the systolic and diastolic parameters were found throughout the study period. Myocardial fructose levels were significantly increased in the diabetic untreated animals compared to normal control rats (P < 0.05), whereas these were significantly decreased in the sulindac (6 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) treated animals (301.11+/-37.98, 214.11+/-25.31, vs. 914.88+/-56.01 nmol/g) compared to diabetic vehicle treated group (P < 0.05). Extensive focal ischemic myocyte degeneration was observed in the diabetic untreated and vehicle treated rats, whereas in the sulindac (6 mg/kg) treated rats, minimal necrosis was found, with no evidence of necrosis in sulindac (20 mg/kg) group. Our results show for the first time that sulindac has a cardioprotective activity as this agent prevented the development of left ventricular dysfunction in STZ-induced diabetic rats in the 12-week chronic study.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Renal hemodynamic effects of nabumetone, sulindac, and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis.

We assessed the effects of nabumetone, sulindac, and placebo on renal function and renal excretion of vasodilatory prostaglandins in older female patients (age >50 years) with osteoarthritis and normal renal function. Using a prospective, crossover design, we compared the effects of nabumetone 2000 mg/d and sulindac 400 mg/d with placebo on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), and urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha in 12 patients. Urinary excretion of vasodilatory prostaglandins was not decreased after 14 days of treatment with either nabumetone or sulindac. Likewise, treatment with nabumetone or sulindac did not significantly alter renal function compared with placebo. There were no differences in mean changes in GFR or RPF from baseline after treatment with nabumetone or sulindac compared with placebo. The mean (+/- SD) changes in GFR from baseline were 0%+/-8% in patients receiving nabumetone, -8%+/-15% in patients receiving sulindac, and -7%+/-15% in patients receiving placebo. The results of this study demonstrate that treatment with nabumetone or sulindac caused no deterioration in renal function in older female patients with osteoarthritis and normal renal function.

6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha↗

PubMed1994

The influence of sulindac on experimental streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathy.

We studied the influence of sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent on experimental streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathy. Untreated diabetic rats were compared with nondiabetic rats, diabetic rats treated with low dose insulin and diabetic rats given sulindac (6.0 mg/kg by gavage 5 of 7 days weekly). Neuropathy was assessed by following serial in vivo motor and sensory caudal conduction, resistance to ischemic conduction failure, and in vitro conduction in sural myelinated and unmyelinated sensory fibers. The impact of low dose insulin and sulindac treatment on the microenvironment of the L4 dorsal root ganglion and sciatic endoneurium was assessed by measuring local perfusion and oxygen tension after 16 weeks of diabetes. Sulindac normalized conduction velocity in caudal sensory fibers, sural myelinated fibers and sural unmyelinated fibers, and reduced the number of diabetic cataracts. Sulindac also normalized a deficit in dorsal root ganglion blood flow and a reduction in sciatic endoneurial oxygen tension in diabetic rats. Low dose insulin improved neuropathy as well but the pattern of benefits was less robust than that of sulindac. Sulindac may be a candidate for a clinical trial in human diabetic polyneuropathy.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Dietary anthocyanin-rich tart cherry extract inhibits intestinal tumorigenesis in APC(Min) mice fed suboptimal levels of sulindac.

A promising approach for cancer chemoprevention might be a combination therapy utilizing dietary phytochemicals and anticarcinogenic pharmaceuticals at a suboptimal dosage to minimize any potential adverse side effects. To test this hypothesis, various dosages of anthocyanin-rich tart cherry extract were fed in combination with suboptimal levels of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac to APCMin mice for 19 weeks. By the end of the feeding period, fewer mice that were fed the anthocyanin-rich extract in combination with sulindac lost more than 10% of body weight than mice fed sulindac alone. Mice that were fed anthocyanin-rich extract (at any dose) in combination with sulindac had fewer tumors and a smaller total tumor burden (total tumor area per mouse) in the small intestine when compared to mice fed sulindac alone. These results suggest that a dietary combination of tart cherry anthocyanins and sulindac is more protective against colon cancer than sulindac alone.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1985

Sulindac is not renal sparing in man.

We investigated the claimed renal-sparing effect of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor sulindac. Fifteen normal women following a diet of 50 mEq salt a day were randomly assigned to 5 days of either placebo, sulindac, 200 mg b.i.d., or indomethacin, 25 mg q.i.d., after first serving as their own controls. Renal effects were assessed by the excretion rate of prostaglandin (PG) E2 (an index of renal PG synthesis), sodium balance, plasma renin activity (PRA), and the response to furosemide. Systemic effects were assessed by collagen-induced platelet aggregation and thromboxane B2 formation and by the urinary excretion of a systemically formed metabolite of PGF2 alpha (PGF-M). Both sulindac and indomethacin resulted in a positive sodium balance and a reduction in 24-hour urinary PGE2 excretion (range -49% to -86%). Basal PRA was decreased by indomethacin only, but the increases in PRA and in urinary PGE2 excretion in response to furosemide were inhibited by both sulindac and indomethacin. Sulindac reduced the natriuresis induced by furosemide, and indomethacin reduced the rise in inulin clearance after furosemide. Thus the two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had similar effects on the kidney. Indomethacin had a greater effect than sulindac on the inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation and thromboxane synthesis and the two drugs had equivalent effects on the reduction of PGF-M excretion. Peak plasma drug concentration of indomethacin (1.9 +/- 0.4 microgram/ml) and sulindac sulfide (7.7 +/- 1.9 microgram/ml) were those associated with clinical efficacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1985

Acute renal effects of sulindac and indomethacin in chronic renal failure.

The effects of 2 days of oral dosing with sulindac (200 mg twice a day) or indomethacin (75 mg twice a day) on glomerular filtration rate, urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2, sodium homeostasis, and other renal function parameters were investigated in eight patients with chronic stable impaired renal function. Indomethacin reduced creatinine clearance (from 41.0 +/- 7.9 to 30.3 +/- 6.3 ml/min) and increased serum levels of creatinine and beta 2-microglobulin. Sulindac had no effect on any of these parameters. Both drugs induced depression of urinary prostaglandin E2 excretion; this depression was greater after indomethacin. Urinary sodium excretion fell from 144.4 +/- 18.7 to 85.5 +/- 9.7 mmol/24 hr after indomethacin and from 131.7 +/- 11.6 to 103.4 +/- 13.3 mmol/24 hr after sulindac. Body weight increased 1.2 kg after indomethacin but was not changed by sulindac. Plasma renin activity was reduced from 2.3 +/- 0.8 to 1.7 +/- 0.6 nmol/L/hr by sulindac and from 2.8 +/- 0.8 to 1.5 +/- 0.5 nmol/L/hr by indomethacin. Urinary N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase and kallikrein excretion was not changed by either drug. Our data suggest that sulindac affects renal prostaglandin E2 synthesis and sodium excretion in patients with severe renal failure to a lesser extent than does indomethacin. Sulindac still seems to be the drug of choice in this group of patients, but glomerular filtration rate, body weight, and electrolyte balance should be carefully monitored.

Acetylglucosaminidase↗

PubMed1987

Biotransformation of sulindac in end-stage renal disease.

In normal humans sulindac, a prodrug, undergoes two major biotransformations: irreversible oxidation to the inactive sulfone metabolite and reversible reduction to the pharmacologically active sulfide metabolite. To assess any effect of end-stage renal failure on sulindac biotransformation, six patients were given 200 mg sulindac orally. Plasma was sampled over 24 hours. Protein binding of sulindac and metabolites was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Results were compared with historic controls. AUC(0-12) for sulindac and the sulfone were similar to controls. AUC(0-12) for the sulfide was significantly reduced to 4.85 micrograms X hr/ml from 13.1 micrograms X hr/ml (P less than 0.02). Protein binding of all three compounds was significantly reduced by renal failure. When corrected for protein binding, the AUC(0-12) for sulindac and the sulfone was twice that of controls whereas that of the sulfide was 42 ng X hr/ml compared with 83 ng X hr/ml in normal individuals (P less than 0.001). This suggests that end-stage renal failure impairs the reduction of sulindac to the active sulfide whereas oxidation to the sulfone is intact.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1991

Individual variability in concentrations of urinary sulindac sulfide.

Among 70 patients with arthritis who were receiving satisfactory maintenance therapy with sulindac (300 to 400 mg daily), 64% had no detectable sulindac sulfide (active metabolite) in one to four random urine specimens. However, 36% had 1.0 to 7.8 (mean, 2.2 +/- 1.4) micrograms/ml sulindac sulfide in urine, similar to the therapeutically effective concentrations found in 24 concurrent plasma specimens (1.4 to 9.0 micrograms/ml). Ten patients had sulindac sulfide in only one or two of two to four urine specimens. Thus, 36% of the patients had pharmacodynamically significant concentrations of sulindac sulfide in urine, presumably capable of suppressing the cyclooxygenase pathway responsible for prostaglandin synthesis in the kidney and elsewhere. The findings suggest individual variability in the capacity for renal oxidation of sulindac sulfide to inactive metabolites, perhaps related to genetic or environmental factors or both. These findings may help to explain conflicting reports on the effects of sulindac on urinary prostaglandins and renal function.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Sulindac targets nuclear beta-catenin accumulation and Wnt signalling in adenomas of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and in human colorectal cancer cell lines.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have chemopreventive potential against colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). Inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 underlies part of this effect, although COX-2-independent mechanisms may also exist. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs appear to inhibit the initial stages of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, suggesting a link to the APC/beta-catenin/TCF pathway (Wnt-signalling pathway). Therefore, the effect of the NSAID sulindac on nuclear (nonphosphorylated) beta-catenin and beta-catenin/TCF-mediated transcription was investigated. Nuclear beta-catenin expression was assessed in pretreatment colorectal adenomas and in adenomas after treatment with sulindac from five patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Also, the effect of sulindac sulphide on beta-catenin/TCF-mediated transcription was studied. Adenomas of FAP patients collected after treatment with sulindac for up to 6 months showed less nuclear beta-catenin expression compared to pretreatment adenomas of the same patients. Sulindac sulphide abrogated beta-catenin/TCF-mediated transcription in the CRC cell lines DLD1 and SW480, and decreased the levels of nonphosphorylated beta-catenin. As a result, the protein levels of the positively regulated TCF targets Met and cyclin D1 were downregulated after sulindac treatment. This study provides in vivo and in vitro evidence that nuclear beta-catenin localisation and beta-catenin/TCF-regulated transcription of target genes can be inhibited by sulindac. The inhibition of Wnt-signalling provides an explanation for the COX-2-independent mechanism of chemoprevention by NSAIDs.

Adenoma↗