Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulbactam”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized comparative study of sulbactam plus ampicillin vs. metronidazole plus cefotaxime in the management of acute appendicitis in children.

Sulbactam is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that, when combined with ampicillin, gives the latter antibiotic a broad spectrum of activity, making it suitable for use as a prophylactic agent in acute appendicitis. In a single-blind, randomized trial, the efficacy of sulbactam plus ampicillin was compared with that of metronidazole plus cefotaxime. Thirty-five children undergoing appendectomy received intravenous sulbactam and ampicillin, while 38 children received metronidazole and cefotaxime. Single doses were given unless the appendix was considered gangrenous or perforated, in which case the drugs were administered for 72 hr. There were three wound infections in the group given sulbactam and ampicillin and five in the group given metronidazole and cefotaxime. The combination of sulbactam and ampicillin was well tolerated and appeared to be at least as effective as that of metronidazole and cefotaxime in the prevention of sepsis following appendectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1984

Synergistic activity of cefsulodin combined with cefoxitin and sulbactam against Bacteroides species.

The in-vitro activity of cefsulodin combined with sulbactam, cefoxitin or cefotaxime was investigated against 32 strains of beta-lactamase-producing Bacteroides species. Synergy of cefsulodin-sulbactam or cefsulodin-cefoxitin could be demonstrated against 30 of 32 and 32 of 32 strains tested at the concentrations readily achievable in serum. In the presence of 1 mg/l of sulbactam or cefoxitin, more than 90% of the Bacteroides isolated were inhibited by 32 mg/l of cefsulodin. The inhibitory activity of cefsulodin-sulbactam or cefsulodin-cefoxitin combinations was bactericidal against Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus. In contrast, no synergistic inhibitory or bactericidal activities can be observed by the cefsoludin-cefotaxime combination. Both sulbactam and cefoxitin were potent inhibitors of beta-lactamases produced by Bact. fragilis and Bact. melaninogenicus suggesting that this inhibitory activity might be one of the factors contributing to the synergistic combinations.

Bacteroides↗
PubMed1992

Multicentre study on antibiotic susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone-sulbactam and other antimicrobial agents.

The antibiotic susceptibilities of 241 anaerobic bacteria recovered from six geographic sites in North America were tested by agar dilution to cefoperazone-sulbactam and other drugs. Of the 189 Bacteroides fragilis group isolates, only one was resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam (0.5%) or ampicillin-sulbactam (0.5%), and none was resistant to ticarcillin-clavulanate or chloramphenicol. No resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam was observed among the other Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp., or Peptostreptococcus spp. Resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam is not commonly observed against anaerobic bacteria recovered from different geographical sites across North America.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of penicillin G plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor (sulbactam) with spectinomycin for treatment of urethritis caused by penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

When combined with penicillin, sulbactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor with weak intrinsic antibacterial activity, produces a marked synergistic effect in vitro against penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We compared a regimen of aqueous procaine penicillin G, sulbactam, and probenecid with spectinomycin for the treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis. Of 101 patients receiving the penicillin-sulbactam regimen, 97 (97%) were cured of their infection, as were 87 (95%) of 92 patients who received spectinomycin. Fifty per cent of patients were infected with penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae; 43 (94%) of 46 treated with the penicillin-sulbactam regimen were cured as compared with 47 (92%) of 51 treated with spectinomycin. Neither regimen was associated with serious adverse effects. The results show that aqueous procaine penicillin G given with sulbactam and probenecid is an effective alternative for single-session therapy of urethritis caused by penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Comparative pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam combination in calves and sheep.

The pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and sulbactam administered in combination were studied in calves and sheep. The animals were administered an aqueous solution of ampicillin/sulbactam (2:1, w/w) intravenously and intramuscularly at doses of 13.2 and 6.6 mg.kg-1, respectively. A microbiological method was used to detect ampicillin, and HPLC was used to detect sulbactam in serum. Following intravenous (i.v.) administration, the distribution phases were rapid and similar (about 15 min) for both drugs in both species, whereas sulbactam in calves and ampicillin in sheep showed a faster elimination rate. After intramuscular (i.m.) administration both drugs showed peak concentrations higher in calves than in sheep; the peak time of sulbactam was shorter in calves than in sheep. No other significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of the combination were observed between the species after i.m. injection. The mean residence and absorption times, calculated by non-compartmental analysis, for both calves and sheep suggested that the differences in ampicillin and sulbactam pharmacokinetics could be attributable to the different molecular structures.

Absorption↗
PubMed2004

Ampicillin + sulbactam vs clindamycin +/- cephalosporin for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia and primary lung abscess.

Aspiration pneumonia, necrotising pneumonia and primary lung abscess are complications arising from the aspiration of infectious material from the oral cavity or stomach. There is limited information on optimal antibacterial therapeutic regimens. Patients with pulmonary infection following aspiration (n = 95) were included in a prospective, open, randomised, comparative multicentre trial to compare the safety, clinical and bacteriological efficacy of ampicillin + sulbactam vs. clindamycin +/- cephalosporin. Treated patients (n = 70) received sequential antibiotic therapy with either ampicillin + sulbactam (n = 37) or clindamycin (n = 33), with or without a second- or third-generation cephalosporin, administered until the complete resolution of clinical and radiological abnormalities. Definite or presumptive pathogens were isolated from 58 patients. Mean duration of therapy was 22.7 days for ampicillin + sulbactam and 24.1 days for clindamycin. In patients treated with ampicillin + sulbactam, the clinical response was 73.0% at the end of therapy and 67.5% 7-14 days after therapy. For clindamycin, the rates were 66.7% and 63.5%, respectively. Bacteriological response was similar in both treatment arms. Nine patients died (12.9%), with a Simplified Acute Physiology Score of > 30 points being the only significant predictive factor for therapeutic failure. Ampicillin + sulbactam and clindamycin +/- cephalosporin were both well-tolerated and proved equally effective in the treatment of aspiration pneumonia and lung abscess.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

An evaluation of susceptibility testing methods for ampicillin-sulbactam using a panel of beta-lactamase-producing bacteria.

Bacteria possessing TEM-1-like beta-lactamases are generally regarded as susceptible to ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), while those harboring OXA-1 enzymes are considered resistant. The current study was undertaken to compare susceptibility testing using various combinations of ampicillin and sulbactam to improve clinical correlation. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family harboring TEM-1, SHV-1 or OXA-1-like beta-lactamases were tested using the agar dilution method. A substantial proportion of strains harboring OXA-1-like beta-lactamases showed false susceptibility to SAM at the 1:1 ratio or fixed sulbactam concentration of 8 microg/ml. At a fixed sulbactam concentration of 4 microg/ml, the activity of ampicillin-sulbactam appeared to be reduced, with large numbers of TEM-1 producers becoming frankly resistant. Results obtained with the 2:1 ratio exhibited the closest correlation with that obtained by the currently recommended disk diffusion test. However, very major errors were still found between the disk diffusion test and agar dilution test, suggesting the necessity for consideration of a change in criteria for interpretation of disk diffusion test results. In conclusion, SAM susceptibility testing by agar dilution using other than a 2:1 ratio is not recommended and results should be interpreted with caution.

Agar↗
PubMed1986

Susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi to ampicillin and sulbactam in vitro.

The MICs of ampicillin, ampicillin plus sulbactam in equal proportions, and a range of ampicillin concentrations with a constant 0.5 micrograms/ml concentration of sulbactam were determined for 66 strains of Haemophilus ducreyi by an agar dilution technique with standardized inocula prepared by ultrasonication. Fifty-five strains were susceptible to ampicillin alone (MIC range, 0.06 to 1 microgram/ml). The MICs for the 11 resistant strains were (micrograms per milliliter): range, 8 to greater than 16; MIC for 50% of the strains tested (MIC50), greater than 16; MIC90, greater than 16; 8 of them produced beta-lactamase. In the presence of an equal concentration of sulbactam, the MICs for ampicillin-resistant strains were lowered to (micrograms per milliliter): range, 0.125 to 2; MIC50, 0.25; MIC90, 1. In the presence of a fixed 0.5-micrograms/ml concentration of sulbactam, the MICs for the resistant strains were (micrograms per milliliter): range, 0.125 to 2; MIC50, 0.125; MIC90, 0.25. Sulbactam-ampicillin appears to be suitable for the treatment of H. ducreyi infections, especially those caused by ampicillin-resistant strains.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1988

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given in combination to infected, seriously ill, elderly patients.

The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in combination were evaluated in six, elderly, seriously ill patients treated with the drug combination for intra-abdominal infections. After giving informed consent, three males and three females aged 63.5 to 77.5 (mean 67.9) years and weighing 54.5 to 86.8 (mean, 67.6) kg were treated with cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) infused intravenously every 12 h for at least 5 days. Cefoperazone and sulbactam pharmacokinetics were characterized on both days 1 and 5 of treatment. Eleven serial blood samples were obtained just prior to and following dose 1 on days 1 and 5 of treatment. Mean estimates of cefoperazone maximal concentration in plasma (Cmax), area under the curve of drug concentration in plasma versus time (AUC), half-life (t 1/2), apparent volume of distribution by the area method (Varea), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), and total body clearance (CL) for day 1 (day 5) were 297.5 237.5) micrograms/ml, 1,247 (1,063) micrograms.h/ml, 7.0 (4.9) h, 16.1 (13.4) liter, 13.1 (14.4) liter, and 28.9 (34.2) ml/min, respectively. Day 1 (day 5) mean values for sulbactam Cmax, AUC, t 1/2, Varea, Vss, and CL were 110.3 (78.0) micrograms/ml, 228 (217) micrograms.h/ml, 3.4 (2.5) h, 26.1 (18.5) liter, 18.9 (15.4) liter, and 97 (94) ml/min, respectively. Both drugs evidenced slower elimination and greater pharmacokinetic variability in these patients compared with values previously reported for normal volunteers. As patients improved during the course of therapy, the only pharmacokinetic parameter significantly changed between days 1 and 5 was a shortened sulbactam t 1/2. Our inability to find substantial evidence of pharmacokinetic normalization may have been related to sample size and study duration. Both drugs were present in potentially therapeutic concentrations for the entire 12-h dosing interval, but without undue accumulation from days 1 to 5.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1990

Penetration of ampicillin and sulbactam in the lower airways during respiratory infections.

We studied the penetration of ampicillin-sulbactam in the alveolar lining fluid (ALF) of eight patients after intravenous administration of 2,000 mg of ampicillin and 1,000 mg of sulbactam three times daily over 30 min. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed on day 3, 30 min after the end of the morning drug administration. The mean penetration ratios (i.e., the ratios of the concentrations in ALF versus those in serum) were 53% (standard error, 12%) and 61% (standard error 31%) for ampicillin and sulbactam, respectively. The concentration ratio of ampicillin versus sulbactam in serum was not significantly different from that in ALF. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, ampicillin-sulbactam is a good choice for treatment of infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, since the concentrations of both drugs in ALF exceed the MICs for the respiratory pathogens responsible.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Oxidant-scavenging activities of ampicillin and sulbactam and their effects on neutrophil functions.

Luminol-enhanced luminescence is a method used to measure formation of reactive oxygen intermediates important in the ability of neutrophils to kill microbes. Several studies have demonstrated that under some conditions of incubation, ampicillin can inhibit neutrophil-derived luminol-enhanced luminescence. We evaluated the mechanism(s) by which ampicillin inhibited the luminescent response of stimulated neutrophils. We also investigated sulbactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor which has been given in combination with ampicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics to increase their spectra, for possible similar effects. Both ampicillin and sulbactam attenuated luminol-enhanced luminescence by approximately 40%. Superoxide production was not prevented by added ampicillin, nor was superoxide scavenged by it. Myeloperoxidase reacts with H2O2 and Cl- to generate OCl-, which is believed to be the oxidizer of luminol that is primarily responsible for enhancement of neutrophil-derived luminescence. Hydroxyl radicals (HO.), which may also oxidize luminol, resulting in luminescence, can be formed from O2- and H2O2 via either myeloperoxidase-dependent (involving intermediate OCl-) or myeloperoxidase-independent (through a metal ion catalyst) reactions. Ampicillin scavenged H2O2 and OCl- and prevented 95% of Fenton reaction-generated HO. from reacting with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide. Sulbactam was found to scavenge OCl- and HO., but less avidly than ampicillin did. Neither ampicillin nor sulbactam inhibited myeloperoxidase activity. Sublethal concentrations of sulbactam had no significant effect on neutrophil killing of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Our results demonstrate a mechanism(s) by which ampicillin inhibits luminol-enhanced luminescence from stimulated neutrophils, namely, through scavenging of the oxidant(s) primarily responsible for the generation of luminescence.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1996

Predictors of effect of ampicillin-sulbactam against TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model: enzyme activity versus MIC.

The clinical outcome in patients treated with ampicillin-sulbactam may not always be predictable by disc susceptibility testing or with the MIC as determined with a constant level (4 micrograms/ml) of the beta-lactamase inhibitor (MIC1). The enzyme activities (EA) and the MICs estimated at a constant ratio of ampicillin to sulbactam of 2:1 (MIC2) for 15 TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing strains of Escherichia coli were examined as alternatives to MIC1 as predictors of the antibacterial effects of this combined drug as studied in an in vitro model which simulates ampicillin-sulbactam pharmacokinetic profiles observed in human peripheral tissues. Integral parameters describing the area under the bacterial count-time curve (AUBC), the area between the normal growth curve, and the killing curve of bacteria exposed to antibiotic (ABBC), and the second parameter expressed as a percentage of its maximal hypothetical value (ABBC/ABBCmax) were calculated. All three parameters correlated well with EA (AUBC, r = 0.93; ABBC, r = -0.88; ABBC/ABBCmax, r = -0.91) and with MIC2 (r = 0.94, -0.94, and -0.95, respectively) but not with MIC1. Both EA and MIC2 can be considered reliable predictors of the antibacterial effect of ampicillin-sulbactam in an in vitro model. These correlations suggest that in vitro kinetic-dynamic models might be useful to reexamine established susceptibility breakpoints obtained with data based on the MIC1 (MICs obtained with constant levels of beta-lactamase inhibitors). These data also suggest that quantitative determinations of bacterial beta-lactamase production and MICs based on the component concentration ratio observed in vivo might be useful predictors of the effect of ampicillin-sulbactam and other beta-lactam-inhibitor combinations.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1996

Importance of penicillinase production for activity of penicillin alone or in combination with sulbactam in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The activity of penicillin, alone and in combination with sulbactam, against a heterogeneously methicillin-resistant, penicillinase-producing clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus and its penicillinase-negative derivative was investigated in vitro and in a rabbit experimental endocarditis model. Penicillin was significantly more effective than vancomycin against the penicillinase-negative derivative in vivo (P < 0.001), and it sterilized 25% of the vegetations. The combination of penicillin and sulbactam exhibited an in vivo synergistic effect on the penicillinase-producing strain (P < 0.01) but did not produce any advantage over treatment with vancomycin, even when a high dose of sulbactam was used (100 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h). This combination was significantly less effective against the penicillinase-producing strain than was penicillin alone against the penicillinase-negative derivative (P < 0.03). In addition, the most resistant subpopulation of the surviving bacteria, which grew on agar containing 16 micrograms of methicillin per ml, was detected in 5 of 6 animals treated with penicillin and a high dose of sulbactam against the penicillinase-producing strain compared with only 1 of 12 animals treated with penicillin alone against the penicillinase-negative derivative (P < 0.01). We conclude that penicillin is highly effective against penicillinase-negative methicillin-resistant S. aureus and that penicillinase production, rather than methicillin resistance, appears to be the limiting factor for the activity of the penicillin-sulbactam combination against penicillinase-producing, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Net effect of inoculum size on antimicrobial action of ampicillin-sulbactam: studies using an in vitro dynamic model.

To examine the predictable effect of inoculum size on the kinetics of the antimicrobial action of ampicillin-sulbactam, five TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains were studied in an in vitro dynamic model at two different initial inocula (N0S). All bacteria were exposed to ampicillin-sulbactam in a simulated system reflecting the pharmacokinetic profiles in human tissue after the administration of a single intravenous dose of ampicillin (2 g) plus sulbactam (1 g). Each strain was studied at low (4.0 to 5.2 log CFU/ml) and high (5.0 to 7.1 log CFU/ml) N0S. Despite pronounced differences in susceptibilities, the patterns of the killing curves observed with a given strain at different N0S were similar. As expected, viable bacterial counts increased with inoculum size. Striking visual contrasts in the respective curves for each organism were reflected by the area under the bacterial count-time curve (AUBC) but not by the difference between the N0 and the lowest bacterial counts (Nmin) at the nadir of the killing curve: the N0-associated changes in the AUBC on average were 75%, versus 2.5% for log N0--logNmin. To examine qualitative differences in antimicrobial effects at different N0S (i.e., the net effect of the inoculum), the difference in the high and low N0S was subtracted from each point on the killing curve obtained at the higher N0 for each strain. These adjusted curves were virtually superimposable on the observed killing curves obtained at the lower N0. Moreover, by using adjusted data, the AUBC values were similar at the two inocula, although slight (average, 11%) but systematic increases in the AUBC occurred at high N0S. Thus, there was only a weak net effect of inoculum size on the antibacterial effect of ampicillin-sulbactam. Due to similar slopes of the AUBC-log N0 plots, the antibacterial action at different N0S may be easily predicted by an approximate equation; the predicted AUBCs were unbiased and well correlated with the observed AUBCs (r = 0.997). Compiled data obtained with normalized AUBCs for different strains at different N0S yielded a positive correlation (r = 0.963) between the N0-normalized AUBC and the MIC of ampicillin-sulbactam. The adjustment and normalization procedure described might be a useful tool for revealing the net effect of the inoculum and to predict the inoculum effect if there are no qualitative differences in antimicrobial action at different inocula.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1998

Activity of trovafloxacin (with or without ampicillin-sulbactam) against enterococci in an in vitro dynamic model of infection.

Antibiotic-resistant enterococci are being increasingly identified as causal agents of infection. Trovafloxacin is a new fluoronaphthyridone with enhanced activity against gram-positive cocci and variable activity reported against Enterococcus spp. Twenty-one strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and two strains of Enterococcus faecalis (one vancomycin resistant) were studied at an initial inoculum of 10(6) CFU/ml in time-kill assays with trovafloxacin (3 mg/liter), ampicillin-sulbactam (100/50 mg/liter), and the combination. Six strains of E. faecium (five vancomycin resistant) also were studied in an in vitro two-compartment dynamic model that mimics human pharmacokinetics with trovafloxacin simulated at 300 mg every 12 h (q12h), ampicillin-sulbactam at 2/1 g q6h, and the combination. Peripheral compartments were sampled q2h for 30 h for bacterial counts. Trovafloxacin MICs ranged from 0.5 to 32 mg/liter, and the nine strains of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium for which MICs were < or =2 mg/liter were more likely to show a reduction of 2 log units or more in viable counts in time-kill assays than were strains for which MICs were higher. Synergism with ampicillin-sulbactam was found for only one strain (trovafloxacin MIC, 16 mg/liter). Similar results were obtained in the pharmacokinetic model, with 2- to 4-log-unit reductions in viable bacteria for trovafloxacin-susceptible strains. Although no convincing evidence of synergism was found, ampicillin-sulbactam in combination minimized late bacterial regrowth of two trovafloxacin-susceptible strains. These data suggest that this high dose of trovafloxacin (with or without ampicillin-sulbactam) might be useful against strains of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium for which MICs were < or =2 mg/liter.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1999

Ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli isolates with different beta-lactam resistance phenotypes.

The activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate were studied with 100 selected clinical Escherichia coli isolates with different beta-lactam susceptibility phenotypes by standard agar dilution and disk diffusion techniques and with a commercial microdilution system (PASCO). A fixed ratio (2:1) and a fixed concentration (clavulanate, 2 and 4 micrograms/ml; sulbactam, 8 micrograms/ml) were used in the agar dilution technique. The resistance frequencies for amoxicillin-clavulanate with different techniques were as follows: fixed ratio agar dilution, 12%; fixed concentration 4-micrograms/ml agar dilution, 17%; fixed ratio microdilution, 9%; and disk diffusion, 9%. Marked discrepancies were found when these results were compared with those obtained with ampicillin-sulbactam (26 to 52% resistance), showing that susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid cannot be predicted by testing the isolate against ampicillin-sulbactam. Interestingly, the discrimination between susceptible and intermediate isolates was better achieved with 4 micrograms of clavulanate per ml than with the fixed ratio. In contrast, amoxicillin susceptibility was not sufficiently restored when 2 micrograms of clavulanate per ml was used, particularly in moderate (mean beta-lactamase activity, 50.8 mU/mg of protein) and high-level (215 mU/mg) TEM-1 beta-lactamase producer isolates. Four micrograms of clavulanate per milliliter could be a reasonable alternative to the 2:1 fixed ratio, because most high-level beta-lactamase-hyperproducing isolates would be categorized as nonsusceptible, and low- and moderate-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be categorized as nonresistant. This approach cannot be applied to sulbactam, either with the fixed 2:1 ratio or with the 8-micrograms/ml fixed concentration, because many low-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be classified in the resistant category. These findings call for a review of breakpoints for beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitors combinations.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2000

Activities of trovafloxacin and ampicillin-sulbactam alone or in combination versus three strains of vancomycin- intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

The recent isolation of clinical strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with intermediate susceptibility (MICs, 8 microg/ml) to vancomycin (vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA]) emphasizes the importance of developing novel antimicrobial regimens and/or agents for future treatment. We studied the activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and trovafloxacin alone or in combination against three unique strains of VISA in an in vitro infection model. Two VISA strains were trovafloxacin susceptible (MICs, < or =2 microg/ml); one VISA strain was trovafloxacin resistant (MIC, 4 microg/ml). Trovafloxacin was administered to simulate a dose of 200 or 400 mg every 24 h. Ampicillin-sulbactam was administered to simulate a dose of 3 g every 6 h. Samples were removed from the infection models over 48 h, and reductions in colony counts were compared between regimens. Trovafloxacin (200 mg) produced rapid killing of a control MRSA strain over the 48-h experiment but produced only slight killing of all three VISA strains. The higher dose of trovafloxacin improved killing but did not produce bactericidal activity at 48 h. Ampicillin-sulbactam produced rapid bactericidal activity against all four strains tested, and colony counts at 8 h were at the limits of detection. However, regrowth occurred by 48 h for each strain. The combination of ampicillin-sulbactam and trovafloxacin provided additive activity against two of the three VISA strains. In conclusion, trovafloxacin or ampicillin-sulbactam alone did not provide adequate activity against the VISA strains for the 48-h evaluation period, but the combination could help improve activity against some strains of VISA.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed2001

Clinical isolation and resistance patterns of and superinfection with 10 nosocomial pathogens after treatment with ceftriaxone versus ampicillin-sulbactam.

Isolation of pathogens from clinical cultures and their resistance patterns may be altered by antecedent antibiotic treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of treatment with ceftriaxone versus that with ampicillin-sulbactam on recovery and superinfections with 10 nosocomial pathogens. The study was designed as a historical cohort study, using a propensity score to adjust for confounding by indication and multivariate survival analyses to adjust for other confounding. Two thousand four hundred forty-five patients were treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, and 1, 308 were treated with ceftriaxone. The study analyzed two outcomes: (i) recovery of pathogens from clinical cultures and (ii) microbiologically documented infections. Data were obtained from administrative, pharmacy, clinical, and laboratory databases and by chart extraction. Following treatment, new isolation of at least 1 of the 10 target pathogens occurred for 244 patients. After adjustment, more infections occurred in the ampicillin-sulbactam group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; P = 0.009). This was observed with all gram-negative rods combined (HR, 3.6; P < 0.001) and with each genus of the family Enterobacteriaceae. No differences in isolation of gram-positive bacteria were evident (P = 0.33). Microbiologically documented superinfections occurred in 172 patients and were less frequent in the ceftriaxone group (3.8% versus 5%; HR, 1.6; P = 0. 015). All the Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone, but half were resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam. The prevalence of oxacillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates was higher in the ceftriaxone group (63% versus 31%; odds ratio, 3.8; P = 0.08). Differences in the rates of superinfections and the likely causative organisms following treatment with ceftriaxone or ampicillin-sulbactam were evident. This may guide clinicians in empirical choices of antibiotics to treat superinfection.

Aged↗