Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Subliminal Stimulation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Time course of corticospinal excitability in reaction time and self-paced movements.

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to study the time course of corticospinal excitability before and after brisk thumb abduction movements, either in a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm or self-paced. Premovement increase in corticospinal excitability began about 20 msec earlier for self-paced compared with simple RT movements. For both simple RT and self-paced movements after electromyographic (EMG) offset, there was a first period of increased excitability from 0 to 100 msec, followed by a second period from 100 to 160 msec. Corticospinal excitability was decreased from about 500 to 1,000 msec after EMG offset for both types of movements. Our results show that motor preparation that begins 1.5 to 2 seconds before self-paced movement is not associated with increased corticospinal excitability. The first phase of increased corticospinal excitability after EMG offset may be due to activity of motor cortex neuron subthreshold for activating spinal motor neurons, and the second phase may reflect a subthreshold second agonist burst. The period of decreased corticospinal excitability after movement corresponds to the onset of event-related synchronization (ERS) of electroencephalographic signals in the 20-Hz band, and supports the hypothesis that ERS may be related to an inactive, idling state of the motor cortex.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Characterization of the cerebral cortical representation of heartburn in GERD patients.

Although symptoms arising from the esophagus such as heartburn and pain can at times become challenging clinical problems, esophageal viscerosensation, especially with regard to chemical stimulation in humans, is incompletely understood. Our aims were 1) to characterize and ascertain the reproducibility of cerebral cortical registration of heartburn and 2) to elucidate the differences between these findings and those of esophageal subliminal acid stimulation in asymptomatic controls. We studied 11 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients (9 males, 30-55 yr) and 15 healthy controls (8 males, 21-49 yr). Cerebral cortical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity was recorded twice in each subject, during two 5-min intervals of 0.1 N HCl, separated by 5 min of NaCl perfusion. Time from onset of acid perfusion to instant of fMRI signal increase and first report of heartburn averaged 1.60 +/- 0.80 and 1.85 +/- 0.60 min, respectively. Average maximum percent signal increase in the GERD patients (16.3 +/- 3.5%) was significantly greater than that of healthy controls (3.8 +/- 0.9%; P < 0.01). Temporal fMRI signal characteristics during heartburn were significantly different from those of subliminal acid stimulation in controls (P < 0.01). Activated cortical regions included sensory/motor, parieto-occipital, cingulate and prefrontal regions, and the insula. There was 92% concordance between the activated Brodmann areas in repeated studies of GERD patients. Cortical activity associated with perceived and unperceived esophageal acid exposure in GERD patients and healthy controls, respectively, involves multiple brain regions but occurs more rapidly and with greater intensity in GERD patients than the activity in response to subliminal acid exposure in healthy controls. The cortical pain-processing pathway seems to be involved in perception of esophageal acid exposure and could explain the variations encountered in clinical practice defining this sensation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Implicit associative learning engages the hippocampus and interacts with explicit associative learning.

The hippocampus is crucial for conscious, explicit memory, but whether it is also involved in nonconscious, implicit memory is uncertain. We investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging whether implicit learning engages the hippocampus and interacts with subsequent explicit learning. The presentation of subliminal faces-written profession pairs for implicit learning was followed by the explicit learning of supraliminal pairs composed of the same faces combined with written professions semantically incongruous to those presented subliminally (experiment 1), semantically congruous professions (experiment 2), or identical professions (experiment 3). We found that implicit face-profession learning interacted with explicit face-profession learning in all experiments, impairing the explicit retrieval of the associations. Hippocampal activity increased during the subliminal presentation of face-profession pairs versus face-nonword pairs and correlated with the later impairment of explicit retrieval. These findings suggest that implicit semantic associative learning engages the hippocampus and influences explicit memory.

Association Learning↗