Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ovulation Detection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the prior distributions of three variables that strongly influence reproductive performance in cows.

Ovulation detection rate, pregnancy rate, and embryo loss rate greatly affect the reproductive performance of cows. A previous model described the separate effects of these variables on the resulting calving patterns and assumed that the variables have the same value for all cows belonging to the same herd. This is not a realistic biological assumption, so the beta distribution is used to introduce "between-cow" variation in the three variables. Two approaches are used to find maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of these prior beta distributions. The first considers sequences of ovulations, artificial inseminations, and pregnancies, separately. For both ovulation detection rate and pregnancy rate this approach considers the number of "successes" of each event for a particular cow (e.g., in the case of an ovulation, a success is a detection), and conditions on the total number of occurrences of that event in the cow, so that beta-binomial distributions are considered. However, for embryo loss rate the number of pregnancies required until a particular cow calves is considered, so that a beta-geometric distribution results. If the cow is removed before she calves, a censored sequence will result. The second approach considers the sequences of ovulations, artificial inseminations, pregnancies, and embryo losses, together, which will stop only when the cow calves. Otherwise, if she is removed before that time, a censored sequence will result. In this case, a joint distribution, with three independent prior beta distributions, is considered. The results of the analysis of data from 22 herds are discussed.

Animals↗

Determination of the fertile window: reproductive competence of women--European cycle databases.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present paper is to review the main results of recent European cycle databases on ovulation detection and determination of the fertile window performed by the women themselves. METHODS: The ongoing German Long-term Cycle Database currently comprises 32788 prospectively collected cycle charts of 1551 women, the I European Cycle Database (10 countries) 1328 women/19048 cycles, the II European Cycle Database (six countries) 782 women/6724 cycles, and the World Health Organization Database (one European country) 234 women/2808 cycles. The women record cycle parameters (cervical mucus changes, temperature rise, etc.), family planning intention and sexual behavior. RESULTS: With the symptothermal method of natural family planning it has become possible to determine the fertile window in order to avoid pregnancy with a method effectiveness of 0.3%. According to a small sub-study, the ovulation time observed by the women themselves correlates closely with ovulation detected by ultrasound and measurement of luteinizing hormone (correlation within 1 day in 89% of the 62 cycles). Fertility awareness methods can be integrated into the management of sub-fertility. They seem to shorten the time to pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-observation of the fertile window puts women into a position to develop a high level of reproductive competence that could be used much more in different areas than is currently the case.

Adult↗

A study of the use of intermittent serum luteinizing hormone, progesterone and oestradiol measurements for the detection of ovulation.

The value of luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P) and oestradiol (E2) in serum as an index of ovulation and corpus luteum function was studied in blood samples collected at infrequent intervals during the menstrual cycle from 19 healthy Thai women. A serum P level of more than 3 ng/ml was detectable in 70 to 80 per cent samples obtained between days 20 and 25 and a P peak and/or E2 peak (greater than 150 pg/ml) were found at this time in 85 to 94 per cent of the cycles. In not more than 26 per cent of the cycles was an LH peak (greater than 150 ng/ml-LER-907) detected when all results were considered. A significant P and/or E2 peak on day 22 or 23 occurred in more than 78 per cent of 25 to 33 day cycles, whereas, the P and/or E2 peak was detectable in only 50 per cent of the cycles lasting less than 25 or more than 33 days. The postovulatory serum P levels were the ones most consistently raised in patients studied over several consecutive cycles.

Adolescent↗

The detection of ovulation with a two-hour radioimmunoassay for human plasma luteinizing hormone using the centria analyzer.

We describe a rapid (2-h) radioimmunoassay for human plasma luteinizing hormone which utilizes the reagents from a commercially available kit. Standardization of the assay was achieved using plasma standards instead of a buffer system and the Centria radioimmunoassay centrifugal analyzer which allowed simultaneous initiation and termination of reactions in all assay tubes. The specifity, precision, and accuracy of the assay were equal to or better than the conventional 24-h assay. Since this assay is designed to derect the mid-cycle surge of luteinizing hormone, its decreased sensitivity was small price to pay for the speed with which a result could be obtained.

Anovulation↗

Characteristics and incidence of dysfunctional ovulation patterns detected by ultrasound.

The nature and incidence of normal and abnormal spontaneous ovarian cycles, identified with ultrasound and endocrine tracking, were examined in 45 regularly cycling infertile women with no definitive cause and 15 women who were apparently normal and were receiving donor insemination because of clearly infertile partners. In 136 cycles, four apparently distinct abnormal patterns were detected. The total incidence in the infertile group was 58% compared with 23% in the donor insemination group (P less than 0.005). Twelve of 26 subjects who had at least three cycles tracked showed two different abnormalities, and 1 subject had three different abnormalities in five abnormal cycles. These results suggest that abnormal cycles are a significant factor in unexplained infertility and that diagnosis and treatment cannot be based on the study of a single cycle.

Adult↗