Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nucleosomes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Location of nucleosomes in simian virus 40 chromatin.

Over the past decade, the results of numerous indirect mappings analyses have not clarified whether or not nucleosomes occupy preferred positions in simian virus 40 (SV40) chromatin. To address this question more directly, we followed a shotgun cloning approach and determined the nucleotide sequences of over 400 cloned nucleosomal DNA fragments obtained from digestion of SV40 chromatin with micrococcal nuclease. Our results demonstrate and establish that nucleosomes do not occupy unique positions in SV40 minichromosomes and thus indicate the existence of at least several types of chromatin molecules having different nucleosome organization patterns. We developed two types of statistical analysis in order to examine the cloning data in greater detail. One type, overlap analysis, revealed the distribution of the cloned fragments with respect to SV40 DNA. The distribution exhibits an oscillating pattern, dividing the genome into regions of weak or strong nucleosome density. The other analysis determined the distribution of the midpoints of the cloned fragments and revealed potential strong and weak nucleosome location sites, and an early versus late distinction in organization of nucleosomes in SV40 chromatin. The late region appears to contain more strong nucleosome location sites (8) than the early region (4). The strongest nucleosome abuts the late side of the nuclease-hypersensitive region and includes the major transcription initiation site of the late genes. Another strong site precedes this nucleosome and includes sequences implicated in controlling the expression of the SV40 early and late genes. A strong or weak nucleosome location site is not apparent near the early side of the nucleosome-hypersensitive region. Only weak and overlapping nucleosome location sites are found in the region where replication terminates in the SV40 minichromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement.

Using competitive reconstitution, we have refined the parameters for the binding of histone octamers to artificial nucleosome-positioning sequences of the form: (A/T3nn(G/C)3nn. We find that the optimal period between flexible segments is approximately 10.1 base-pairs, supporting the view that the DNA on the nucleosome surface is overwound. The strongest requirement for flexible DNA is near the protein dyad. However, we see no indication of changes in DNA helical repeat in this region. Using a series of repetitive sequences, we confirm that neither all A/T-rich nor all G/C-rich regions are identical in promoting nucleosome formation. Surprisingly, A/T-rich segments containing the TpA step, subject to purine-purine clash in the minor groove, favor nucleosome formation over sequences lacking this step. Short tracts of adenine residues are found to position on the histone surface like other A/T-rich regions, in the manner predicted by the direction of their sequence-directed bends as determined by electrophoretic methods. Tracts containing five adenine residues are extremely aniostropic in their flexibility and are strongly detrimental to nucleosome formation when positioned for major groove compression. Longer adenine tracts are found to position near the ends of the nucleosomal DNA. However, other positions may be occupied by an A12 tract, with only a minor penalty in the free energy of nucleosome formation. Overall, reconstituted nucleosome positions are translationally degenerate, suggesting a weak dependence on DNA flexibility for nucleosome positioning. Dinucleosomal reconstitutions on tandem dimers of the 5 S RNA gene of Lytechinus variegatus demonstrate a weak phasing dependence for the interaction between nucleosomes. This interaction is maximal for the 202 base-pair repeat and suggests a co-operative mechanism for the formation of ordered nucleosomal arrays based on a combination of DNA flexibility and nucleosome-nucleosome interactions.

Base Composition↗
PubMed1994

Quantitative agarose gel electrophoresis of chromatin: nucleosome-dependent changes in charge, sharp, and deformability at low ionic strength.

The surface electrical charge density and the deformability of nucleosomal arrays have been characterized by quantitative agarose gel electrophoresis. Monodisperse linear DNA (2.5-3.3 kbp) was reconstituted with histone octamers into either saturated (approximately 1 nucleosome/200-bp DNA) or subsaturated (< 1 nucleosome/200-bp DNA) nucleosomal arrays. The electrophoretic mobility (mu) of both nucleosome-free DNA and nucleosomal arrays was determined at low ionic strength in 0.2-3.0% agarose gels. A semilogarithmic plot of mu vs gel concentration was linear for DNA and convex for saturated nucleosomal arrays. By extrapolating the mu to 0% agarose, the magnitude of the gel-free mu of saturated nucleosomal arrays was found to be approximately 20% lower than that of nucleosome-free DNA molecules. This difference is explained by the net neutralization of approximately 85 DNA negative charges by each histone octamer. By using an internal standard to measure the effective pore size (Pe) of the agarose gel, the effective radius (R) of DNA and nucleosomal arrays was determined at each agarose concentration. In the more dilute gels (Pe > or = 400 nm), the differences between the effective R values of DNA, subsaturated nucleosomal arrays, and saturated nucleosomal arrays are consistent with the differences in their hydrodynamic shapes as measured by analytical velocity centrifugation. However, as Pe decreases, the effective R of both nucleosome-free DNA and subsaturated nucleosomal arrays decreases significantly. This is in contrast to the effective R of saturated nucleosomal arrays, which remains constant at all Pe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1996

High mobility group protein 14 and 17 can prevent the close packing of nucleosomes by increasing the strength of protein contacts in the linker DNA.

High mobility group (HMG) proteins 14 and 17 are abundant chromatin-associated proteins found in all higher eukaryotic nuclei. This observation demonstrates that HMGs 14 and 17 must have an important and universal function with regard to the structure and function of chromatin. What this function is, including how they interact with a nucleosomal array in vivo, is not known. Recently, we have demonstrated that HMGs 14 and 17 can organize nucleosomes into a regular array and increase the repeat length from 145 to about 160-165 base pairs in vitro. In addition, they can increase the apparent repeat length of chromatin deficient in histones H2A/H2B from 125 to approximately 145 base pairs. Importantly, this template was transcriptionally active. In this study, we report five new observations that begin to address the mechanism by which HMGs 14 and 17 space nucleosomal particles. First, we demonstrate that both human placenta HMG 14 and HMG 17 can space nucleosomes to produce a chromatin template with a repeat length around 160 base pairs. This result further highlights the similarity between these proteins in terms of protein structure and perhaps function. Second, we show that digestion of HMG containing chromatin with micrococcal nuclease produces DNA fragments that were approximately 10 and 20 base pairs longer than nucleosome core-particle DNA. This suggests that HMG 14 or HMG 17 can protect, directly or indirectly, at least an additional 10 base pairs of linker DNA from micrococcal digestion. However, this HMG-containing particle does not produce a strong kinetic block, and further digestion results in the eventual accumulation of DNA fragments 145 base pairs in length. Third, by comparing the full-length protein with different domains, we demonstrate that the acidic carboxyl-terminal domain is absolutely required for nucleosome spacing, neither the nucleosome binding domain of HMG 14 or HMG 17 nor the amino-terminal domain plus the nucleosome binding domain of HMG 14 could space nucleosomes. Fourth, we demonstrate that extensive micrococcal nuclease digestion of chromatin deficient in histones H2A/H2B led to the accumulation of DNA fragments about 110 base pairs in length, which is presumably the length of DNA associated with a nucleosomal particle deficient in one H2A/H2B dimer. Incorporation of either HMG 14 or HMG 17 into this chromatin results in the disappearance of this band and increase in the accumulation of fragments around 140-150 base pairs in length. Finally, in contrast to spacing of complete nucleosomes, we find that the nucleosome binding domain of HMG 17 (but not the nucleosome binding of HMG 14) is the only domain required for spacing of H2A/H2B-deficient chromatin.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

CBF/NF-Y functions both in nucleosomal disruption and transcription activation of the chromatin-assembled topoisomerase IIalpha promoter. Transcription activation by CBF/NF-Y in chromatin is dependent on the promoter structure.

To understand the role of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) in transcription in the context of chromatin-assembled DNA, we used regularly spaced nucleosomal DNA using topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) and alpha2(1) collagen promoter templates, which were subsequently reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter containing four CBF-binding sites disrupted the regular nucleosomal structure not only in the promoter region containing the CBF-binding sites but also in the downstream region over the transcription start site. In contrast, no nucleosome disruption was observed in a mutant topo IIalpha promoter containing mutations in all CBF-binding sites. Interestingly, CBF also activated transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter. In this experiment, a promoter containing one wild-type CBF-binding site was activated very weakly, whereas the promoter containing mutations in all sites was not activated by CBF. A truncated CBF that lacked the glutamine-rich domains did not activate transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter but disrupted the nucleosomal structure about as much as did the binding of full-length CBF. Two nucleosomal mouse alpha2(1) collagen promoter DNAs, one containing a single and the other containing four CBF- binding sites, were also reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. None of the nucleosomal collagen promoters was activated by CBF. However, both of these collagen promoters were activated by CBF when the transcription reaction was performed using naked DNA templates. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal collagen promoter containing four binding sites disrupted the nucleosomal structure, similarly as observed in the topo IIalpha promoter. Altogether this study indicates that CBF-mediated nucleosomal disruption occurred independently of transcription activation. It also suggests that specific promoter structure may play a role in the CBF-mediated transcription activation of nucleosomal topo IIalpha promoter template.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1990

Factors affecting nucleosome structure in transcriptionally active chromatin. Histone acetylation, nascent RNA and inhibitors of RNA synthesis.

The nucleosomes of transcriptionally active genes can be separated from those of inactive genes by affinity chromatography on organomercury-agarose (Hg-agarose) columns. The basis for this separation is the difference in accessibility of the sulfhydryl groups of histone H3 and certain non-histone proteins in active and inactive chromatin. A new procedure distinguishing between different modes of binding of transcriptionally active nucleosomes to the Hg-agarose column has been applied to study several factors which might influence the binding reaction. Nucleosomes that bind to the column because of salt-labile associations with SH-reactive non-histone proteins, such as the high-mobility-group proteins, HMG-1 and HMG-2, were released by adding 0.5 M NaCl to the eluting buffer. The remaining nucleosomes, in which reactive histone H3 thiol groups can bind covalently to the organomercury, were then displaced from the column by 10 mM dithiothreitol. Both Hg-agarose-bound fractions contain the transcriptionally active DNA sequences of the cell, but inactive nucleosomes, such as those containing alpha-globin DNA, pass through the column. The histones of both Hg-agarose-bound fractions have significantly higher levels of acetylation than do histones of the unbound fraction, but the content of tri- and tetra-acetylated H3 and H4 is significantly higher in the nucleosomes with reactive H3 thiols. The rate of turnover of histone N-acetyl groups is also far greater in the Hg-agarose-bound nucleosomes than in the unbound nucleosomes. Although the overall levels of histone acetylation can be increased significantly by incubating HeLa cells in the presence of the deacetylase inhibitor, 5 mM sodium butyrate, this treatment has little if any effect on the total number of nucleosomes retained on the Hg-agarose column. However, the ability of Hg-agarose chromatography to detect localized changes in chromatin structure is evidenced by an 11-fold increase in the Hg-agarose binding of nucleosomes containing the DNA of the butyrate-inducible alkaline phosphatase gene, compared to the Hg-agarose-bound nucleosomes of control cells. Although nascent RNA chains are present in the Hg-agarose-bound nucleosomes released by dithiothreitol, binding of the SH-reactive nucleosomes to the Hg-agarose column is not dependent on the presence of proteins associated with nascent RNA chains, since binding does not decrease following removal of the nascent transcripts by ribonuclease treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acetylation↗
PubMed1994

Heat shock factor can activate transcription while bound to nucleosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

After each round of replication, new transcription initiation complexes must assemble on promoter DNA. This process may compete with packaging of the same promoter sequences into nucleosomes. To elucidate interactions between regulatory transcription factors and nucleosomes on newly replicated DNA, we asked whether heat shock factor (HSF) could be made to bind to nucleosomal DNA in vivo. A heat shock element (HSE) was embedded at either of two different sites within a DNA segment that directs the formation of a stable, positioned nucleosome. The resulting DNA segments were coupled to a reporter gene and transfected into the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Transcription from these two plasmid constructions after induction by heat shock was similar in amount to that from a control plasmid in which HSF binds to nucleosome-free DNA. High-resolution genomic footprint mapping of DNase I and micrococcal nuclease cleavage sites indicated that the HSE in these two plasmids was, nevertheless, packaged in a nucleosome. The inclusion of HSE sequences within (but relatively close to the edge of) the nucleosome did not alter the position of the nucleosome which formed with the parental DNA fragment. Genomic footprint analyses also suggested that the HSE-containing nucleosome was unchanged by the induction of transcription. Quantitative comparisons with control plasmids ruled out the possibility that HSF was bound only to a small fraction of molecules that might have escaped nucleosome assembly. Analysis of the helical orientation of HSE DNA in the nucleosome indicated that HSF contacted DNA residues that faced outward from the histone octamer. We discuss the significance of these results with regard to the role of nucleosomes in inhibiting transcription and the normal occurrence of nucleosome-free regions in promoters.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2004

A statistical thermodynamic model applied to experimental AFM population and location data is able to quantify DNA-histone binding strength and internucleosomal interaction differences between acetylated and unacetylated nucleosomal arrays.

Imaging of nucleosomal arrays by atomic force microscopy allows a determination of the exact statistical distributions for the numbers of nucleosomes per array and the locations of nucleosomes on the arrays. This precision makes such data an excellent reference for testing models of nucleosome occupation on multisite DNA templates. The approach presented here uses a simple statistical thermodynamic model to calculate theoretical population and positional distributions and compares them to experimental distributions previously determined for 5S rDNA nucleosomal arrays (208-12,172-12). The model considers the possible locations of nucleosomes on the template, and takes as principal parameters an average free energy of interaction between histone octamers and DNA, and an average wrapping length of DNA around the octamers. Analysis of positional statistics shows that it is possible to consider interactions between nucleosomes and positioning effects as perturbations on a random positioning noninteracting model. Analysis of the population statistics is used to determine histone-DNA association constants and to test for differences in the free energies of nucleosome formation with different types of histone octamers, namely acetylated or unacetylated, and different DNA templates, namely 172-12 or 208-12 5S rDNA multisite templates. The results show that the two template DNAs bind histones with similar affinities but histone acetylation weakens the association of histones with both templates. Analysis of locational statistics is used to determine the strength of specific nucleosome positioning tendencies by the DNA templates, and the strength of the interactions between neighboring nucleosomes. The results show only weak positioning tendencies and that unacetylated nucleosomes interact much more strongly with one another than acetylated nucleosomes; in fact acetylation appears to induce a small anticooperative occupation effect between neighboring nucleosomes.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1991

Chromatin assembly on plasmid DNA in vitro. Apparent spreading of nucleosome alignment from one region of pBR327 by histone H5.

We have found that histone H5 (or H1) induces physiological nucleosome spacings and extensive ordering on some plasmid constructions, but not on others, in a fully defined in vitro system. Plasmid pBR327 containing DNA insertions with lengths close to 300 base-pairs permitted histone H5 to induce a remarkable degree of nucleosome alignment. Seventeen multiples of a unit 210(+/- 4) base-pair repeat, covering the entire plasmid, were detected. Plasmid pBR327, not containing a DNA insert, permitted continuous alignment of only a few nucleosomes. These observations suggest that a necessary requirement in this system for histone H5 (or H1)-induced nucleosome alignment on small (less than 4 kb; 1 kb = 10(3) bases or base-pairs) circular plasmids may be that the total DNA length must be close to an integer multiple of the nucleosome repeat length generated, a type of boundary effect. Consistent with this hypothesis, five deletion constructs of pBR327 (not containing inserts), that spanned 64% of the plasmid, and possessed DNA lengths close to integer multiples of 210 base-pairs, permitted nucleosome alignment by histone H5. We have also found that plasmid length adjustment is not a sufficient condition for nucleosome alignment. For example, plasmids pBR322 and pUC18 did not permit nucleosome alignment when adjusted to near-integer multiples of 210 base-pairs. Also, for pBR327 that contained a length-adjusted deletion in one particular region, appreciable nucleosome alignment no longer occurred. These data suggest that a contiguous approximately 800 base-pair region of pBR327, interrupted in pBR322 and not present in pUC18, can nucleate histone H5-induced nucleosome alignment, which can then spread to adjacent chromatin. Supporting this idea, a positioned five-nucleosome array appears to originate in the required region. Additionally, on a larger (6.9 kb) plasmid construction, the "chromatin organizing region" of pBR327 and adjacent DNA on one side of it exhibited preferred H5-induced nucleosome alignment.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

DNA-repair by photolyase reveals dynamic properties of nucleosome positioning in vivo.

Nucleosomes exert a repressive influence on the biological functions of DNA by restricting the access of proteins to DNA. To investigate how intrinsic properties of nucleosomes modulate DNA-accessibility in vivo, we studied DNA repair by photolyase in the yeast URA3 gene. Formation of DNA lesions (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, CPDs) and photolyase activity are controlled precisely by light. Preceding work revealed that photolyase repairs nucleosome-free DNA rapidly, while repair of nucleosomes is inhibited severely. The high-resolution data presented here show slow repair in the center of nucleosomes and a gradual increase towards the periphery. This pattern was observed in all nucleosomes and demonstrates that dynamic properties facilitate DNA accessibility. Since the URA3 nucleosomes can occupy alternate positions, the repair data are most consistent with nucleosome mobility that moves CPDs in linker DNA where they are repaired rapidly. A partial and transient unfolding or disruption of nucleosomes, however, may not be excluded. In addition, repair heterogeneity was found between closely spaced sites, indicating that structural properties of nucleosomes contribute to damage processing. Moreover, nucleosome-specific modulation of photolyase was found on the transcribed and non-transcribed strand. This is in contrast to homogeneous repair of the transcribed strand by nucleotide excision repair, and reveals fundamental differences in how both repair systems interact with nucleosomes and transcription.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1999

Nucleoprotein gel assays for nucleosome positioning and mobility.

Recent recognition of the sensitivity of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to macromolecular conformation has provided a source of new applications. In chromatin research, nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis can yield a direct and visual estimate of the number and relative abundance of different positions adopted by the core histone octamer on DNA, as well as their locations relative to the middle of the DNA fragment. It is the only technique available for the fractionation of such nucleosome positioning isomers and leaves them intact. Thus this simple method constitutes a powerful tool to analyze and manipulate populations of variously positioned nucleosomes in their native state. Complementing conventional invasive enzymatic procedures that rely on the analysis of cutting patterns on nucleosomal DNA, these procedures are now revealing that histone octamers can reconstitute to a number of discrete, often overlapping, locations on most DNA sequences. Further capitalizing on these advantages of nucleoprotein gel analysis, the development of the technique into a two-dimensional assay has permitted a rare view at the dynamics of nucleosome positioning. Nucleosomes can redistribute between possible positions on DNA, with the distribution patterns of nucleosomes along the DNA being in dynamic equilibrium at 37 degrees in relatively low ionic strength conditions. This mobility of nucleosomes on DNA means that possible positions of nucleosomes can be defined precisely but that the actual locations of the nucleosomes are dynamic. It provides a compelling argument that a nucleosome position should be regarded as a probability rather than a static factor type of binding. This supports a more dynamic view of the nucleosomal organization, which seems more in accordance with the dynamic nature of gene expression. In providing the flexibility for adaptation, multiple positioning and nucleosome mobility could constitute essential ingredients of the mechanisms by which chromatin participates in gene regulation.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1996

Modulation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation in a positioned nucleosome containing poly(dA.dT) tracts.

We have used a defined-sequence nucleosome to concomitantly investigate the generation and location of DNA lesions in nucleosomes and their influence on nucleosome positioning (translational and rotational setting). A 134 bp HISAT sequence from the yeast DED1 promoter, containing a polypyrimidine region (40 bp) with a T6-tract, two T5-tracts, and a T9-tract, was reconstituted in nucleosomes with a defined rotational setting. T-tracts adopt unusually rigid DNA structures in solution ("T-tract structure") and are hot spots of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation by UV light (254 nm). DNA was irradiated with UV light before or after reconstitution. The CPD yields and distribution were analyzed by cleavage with T4 endonuclease V. The rotational setting of nucleosomal DNA was characterized by DNase I digestion. With the exception of one T5-tract (1T5), the T6-, the 2T5-, and the T9-tracts formed T-tract structure in solution. T-tract structure was lost upon folding in nucleosomes, demonstrating a dominant constraint of DNA folding in nucleosomes over that of T-tract structure. CPD formation was strongly modulated by the nucleosome structure, but the CPD distribution differed from that reported for mixed-sequence DNA. CPD formation in the nucleosome had no effect on the rotational setting of nucleosomal DNA, but the rotational setting was affected when nucleosomes were assembled on damaged DNA. The toleration of DNA distortions imposed by CPDs in nucleosomes may have important implications for the recognition and repair of these damages in chromatin.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

DNA structural patterns and nucleosome positioning.

There is no clear picture to date of the mechanisms determining nucleosome positioning. Generally, local DNA sequence signals (sequence-dependent positioning) or non-local signals (e.g. boundary effects) are possible. We have analyzed the DNA sequences of a series of positioned and mapped nucleosome cores in a systematic search for local sequence signals. The data set consists of 113 mapped nucleosome cores, mapped in vivo, in situ, or in reconstituted chromatin. The analysis focuses on the periodic distribution of sequence elements implied by each of six different published DNA structural models. We have also investigated the periodic distribution of all mono-, di-, and trinucleotides. An identical analysis was performed on a set of isolated chicken nucleosome cores (nucleosome data from the literature) that are presumably positioned due to local sequence signals. The results show that the sequences of the isolated nucleosome cores have a number of characteristic features that distinguish them clearly from randomly chosen reference DNA. This confirms that the positioning of these nucleosomes is mainly sequence-dependent (i.e., dependent on local octamer-DNA interactions) and that our algorithms are able to detect these patterns. Using the same algorithms, the sequences of the mapped nucleosome cores, however, are on average very similar to randomly chosen reference DNA. This suggests that the position of the majority of these nucleosomes can not be attributed to the sequence patterns implemented in our algorithms. The arrangement of positioned nucleosomes seems to be the result of a dynamic interplay of octamer-DNA interactions, nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and other positioning signals with varying relative contributions along the DNA.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1990

Nucleosome positioning as a critical determinant for the DNA cleavage sites of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II in reconstituted simian virus 40 chromatin.

We have assessed the ability of nucleosomes to influence the formation of mammalian topoisomerase II-DNA complexes by mapping the sites of cleavage induced by four unrelated topoisomerase II inhibitors in naked versus nucleosome-reconstituted SV40 DNA. DNA fragments were reconstituted with histone octamers from HeLa cells by the histone exchange method. Nucleosome positions were determined by comparing micrococcal nuclease cleavage patterns of nucleosome-reconstituted and naked DNA. Three types of DNA regions were defined: 1) regions with fixed nucleosome positioning; 2) regions lacking regular nucleosome phasing; and 3) a region around the replication origin (from position 5100 to 600) with no detectable nucleosomes. Topoisomerase II cleavage sites were suppressed in nucleosomes and persisted or were enhanced in linker DNA and in the nucleosome-free region around the replication origin. Incubation of reconstituted chromatin with topoisomerase II protected nucleosome-free regions from micrococcal nuclease cleavage without changing the overall micrococcal nuclease cleavage pattern. Thus, the present results indicate that topoisomerase II binds preferentially to nucleosome-free DNA and that the presence of nucleosomes at preferred DNA sequences influences drug-induced DNA breaks by topoisomerase II inhibitors.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function.

Sin mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviate transcriptional defects that result from the inactivation of the yeast SWVI/SNF complex. We have investigated the structural and functional consequences for the nucleosome of Sin mutations in histone H3. We directly test the hypothesis that mutations in histone H3 leading to a SWI/SNF-independent (Sin) phenotype in yeast lead to nucleosomal destabilization. In certain instances this is shown to be true; however, nucleosomal destabilization does not always occur. Topoisomerase I-mediated relaxation of minichromosomes assembled with either mutant histone H3 or wild-type H3 together with histones H2A, H2B, and H4 indicates that DNA is constrained into nucleosomal structures containing either mutant or wild-type proteins. However, nucleosomes containing particular mutant H3 molecules (R116-H and T118-I) are more accessible to digestion by micrococcal nuclease and do not constrain DNA in a precise rotational position, as revealed by digestion with DNase I. This result establishes that Sin mutations in histone H3 located close to the dyad axis can destabilize histone-DNA contacts at the periphery of the nucleosome core. Other nucleosomes containing a distinct mutant H3 molecule (E105-K) associated with a Sin phenotype show very little change in nucleosome structure and stability compared to wild-type nucleosomes. Both mutant and wild-type nucleosomes continue to restrict the binding of either TATA-binding protein/transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) or the RNA polymerase III transcription machinery. Thus, different Sin mutations in histone H3 alter the stability of histone-DNA interactions to various extents in the nucleosome while maintaining the fundamental architecture of the nucleosome and contributing to a common Sin phenotype.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Gal4p-mediated chromatin remodeling depends on binding site position in nucleosomes but does not require DNA replication.

Biochemical studies have demonstrated decreased binding of various proteins to DNA in nucleosome cores as their cognate sites are moved from the edge of the nucleosome to the pseudodyad (center). However, to date no study has addressed whether this structural characteristic of nucleosomes modulates the function of a transcription factor in living cells, where processes of DNA replication and chromatin modification or remodeling could significantly affect factor binding. Using a sensitive, high-resolution methyltransferase assay, we have monitored the ability of Gal4p in vivo to interact with a nucleosome at positions that are known to be inaccessible in nucleosome cores in vitro. Gal4p efficiently bound a single cognate site (UASG) centered at 41 bp from the edge of a positioned nucleosome, perturbing chromatin structure and inducing transcription. DNA binding and chromatin perturbation accompanying this interaction also occurred in the presence of hydroxyurea, indicating that DNA replication is not necessary for Gal4p-mediated nucleosome disruption. These data extend previous studies, which demonstrated DNA replication-independent chromatin remodeling, by showing that a single dimer of Gal4p, without the benefit of cooperative interactions that occur at complex wild-type promoters, is competent for invasion of a preestablished nucleosome. When the UASG was localized at the nucleosomal pseudodyad, relative occupancy by Gal4p, nucleosome disruption, and transcriptional activation were substantially compromised. Therefore, despite the increased nucleosome binding capability of Gal4p in cells, the precise translational position of a factor binding site in one nucleosome in an array can affect the ability of a transcriptional regulator to overcome the repressive influence of chromatin.

Binding Sites↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The effect of DNA supercoiling DNA on nucleosome structure].

The circular DNA which contains nucleosomes and additional supercoils has been considered theoretically. The different possible effect of increased negative supercoiling on the nucleosome structure have been studied. According to the model proposed all supercoils in the nucleosome-containing circular DNA are realized as torsional deformations of the double helix. The free energy of both supercoiling (torsional deformations) and nucleosome stabilization have been taken into consideration to obtain the equation for free energy of nucleosome-containing circular DNA. The analysis of this equation and the experimental data by Garner et al. (II Psoc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987. P. 2620-2623) about the maximum amount of supercoiling obtained by DNA-topoisomerase II treatment of nucleosome-containing pBR322 plasmid has been performed. It has been shown that two possibilities are consistent with both the equation and experimental data. These are: (1) the increased supercoiling induces the torsional strains not only in linker regions but also in nucleosome DNA and thus supercoiling causes an instability on nucleosome structure; (2) increased supercoiling induces a structural change of nucleosome which is accompanied by nucleosome DNA unwinding and its transition into form with approximately 11 base pairs per turn of double helix. It has been evaluated that in the first case the average torsional rigidity of nucleosome DNA should be approximately 2.5 times as much and in the second case--much more than the rigidity of naked DNA. Both types of nucleosome structural changes may cause its transition to a potentially active state for transcription. It is suggested that increased supercoiling can be a switch mechanism of chromatin activation.

Base Composition↗
PubMed1993

Nucleosome structural changes during derepression of silent mating-type loci in yeast.

Mutant a and alpha yeast cells were created with histone H3 containing cysteine in place of alanine 110. Because transcriptionally active nucleosomes "unfold" to reveal the histone H3-thiol groups at the center of the core, the active nucleosomes of the mutant strain can be isolated by mercury-affinity chromatography. We compared the unbound and mercury-bound nucleosomes of haploid H3-mutant strains expressing either the MAT alpha or the MATa mating-type locus. In a MAT alpha strain, the Hg-bound nucleosomes are enriched in MAT alpha DNA but lack the DNA of the transcriptionally silent HMRa mating-type locus. Conversely, in a MATa strain, the Hg-bound nucleosomes are enriched in MATa DNA sequences but deficient in HML alpha DNA. When the SIR3 gene, known to be required for silencing of the repressed mating-type loci, is mutated in the MAT alpha strain, transcription of the HMRa ensues, and its nucleosomes, as well as those of the MAT alpha locus, are retained by the organomercurial column. It follows that derepression of the silent mating-type locus, caused by the sir3 null mutation, is accompanied by an unfolding of its nucleosomes to reveal the histone H3 SH groups at their centers. Nucleosomes of the pheromone-encoding gene MFA2, a gene that is expressed in MATa cells but not in MAT alpha cells, are bound to the organomercurial column when isolated from MATa cells but not from MAT alpha cells. Thus, there is a good correlation between nucleosome unfolding and the renewed transcriptional activity at mating-type loci, and at MFA2, which had been silenced for prolonged periods. A close temporal correlation between nucleosome refolding and the cessation of transcription is not always observed in yeast, however, in contrast to observations in mammalian cells. For example, nucleosomes of the GAL1 gene are maintained in a "poised" or "primed" thiol-reactive state even when the gene is not being transcribed (Chen, T. A., Smith, M. M., Le, S., Sternglanz, R., and Allfrey, V. G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6489-6498). It follows that the unfolding of the nucleosome cores of the yeast H3 mutant is regulated by factors that are not temporally linked to the recruitment or traverse of the RNA polymerase complex, but which may determine the rate at which different domains of chromatin adapt to the need for transcription of the associated DNA sequences.

Chromatography, Affinity↗