Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nelfinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Absence of embryo-fetal toxicity in rats or rabbits following oral dosing with nelfinavir.

The potential for nelfinavir mesylate (VIRACEPT) to induce maternal and embryo-fetal toxicity was evaluated in rats and rabbits following oral administration. The drug was administered by gavage to rats at doses of 200, 500, or 1000mg/kg/day on days 6-17 of gestation and to rabbits at doses of 200, 400, or 1000mg/kg/day on days 7-20 of gestation. Dams and does were euthanized on GD20 and 29, respectively, and the offspring were weighed and examined for external, visceral, and skeletal alterations. Maximum plasma nelfinavir concentrations (C(max)) in rats were comparable to C(max) values in humans and were 3- to 6-fold higher than the reported human trough levels, while plasma nelfinavir levels in rabbits were approximately 0.13-0.17x the human C(max) and 0.25-0.5x the human trough. In rats, no treatment-related maternal or embryo-fetal toxicity was observed at any dose level and the NOAEL for both maternal and fetal toxicity was considered to be 1000mg/kg/day. Two rabbits in the 400mg/kg/day group died prior to scheduled termination. Because no deaths occurred in the high dose group and there were no other treatment-related signs of clinical toxicity in any dose group, these deaths were considered unrelated to nelfinavir. Group mean body weight loss in rabbits was observed at 1000mg/kg/day on gestation days 7-10. Food consumption was also reduced in this treatment group throughout the dosing period. There were no treatment-related findings in other maternal or fetal parameters. Thus, the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity in the rabbit was considered to be 400mg/kg/day (based on maternal body weight loss in the high dose group), while the NOAEL for embryo-fetal toxicity in the rabbit was considered to be 1000mg/kg/day. Thus, under the conditions of this study, nelfinavir was not considered to be toxic to the rat or rabbit conceptus.

Administration, Oral↗

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of nelfinavir, a novel HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human plasma.

Nelfinavir mesylate, a potent and orally bioavailable inhibitor of HIV-1 protease (Ki=2 nM), has undergone Phase III clinical evaluation in a large population of HIV-positive patients. A high-performance liquid chromatography analytical method was developed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the free base, nelfinavir, in these human subjects. The method involved the extraction of nelfinavir and an internal standard, 6,7-dimethyl-2,3-di-(2-pyridyl)quinoxaline, from 250 microl of human plasma with a mixture of ethyl acetate-acetonitrile (90:10, v/v). The analysis was via ultraviolet detection at 220 nm using a reversed-phase C18 analytical column and a mobile phase consisting of 25 mM monobasic sodium phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH 3.4 with phosphoric acid)-acetonitrile (58:42, v/v) that resolved the drug and internal standard peaks from non-specific substances in human plasma. The method was validated under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) conditions for specificity, inter- and intra-assay precision and accuracy, absolute recovery and stability. The mean recovery ranged from 92.4 to 83.0% for nelfinavir and was 95.7% for the internal standard. The method was linear over a concentration range of 0.0300 microg/ml to 10 microg/ml, with a minimum quantifiable level of 0.0500 microg/ml for nelfinavir.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and CYP2C19 activity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with chronic liver disease.

AIMS: To evaluate the single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active M8 metabolite in eight HIV-seropositive patients with liver disease, and to examine the relationship between CYP2C19 activity (genotype and plasma M8/nelfinavir metabolic ratio) and the severity of liver disease in these patients. METHODS: Nelfinavir was given as a single dose (500 or 750 mg) to patients beginning therapy and twice (500, 750 or 1000 mg) or three times (250 or 750 mg) daily during chronic therapy. Single-dose pharmacokinetic values were used to predict multiple-dose regimens. Peak and total plasma exposures between 2-4 microg ml-1 and 45-75 microg ml-1 h, respectively, and predose levels > 0.7 microg ml-1 were targeted for multidose nelfinavir. Genotype was determined by analysis for CYP2C19*1, CYP2C19*2, and CYP2C19*3. Individuals were grouped according to their genotype, molar M8/nelfinavir AUC ratio (low: < 0.1, intermediate: 0.1-0.3, high > 0.3), and Child-Pugh classification for severity of liver disease. RESULTS: Nelfinavir pharmacokinetics were characterized by wide interindividual variability, low clearance (181-496 ml min-1 70 kg-1, n = 7), and prolonged half-life (5-20 h, n = 7). M8/nelfinavir AUC ratio increased 58% (n = 4) and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein levels decreased up to 39% (n = 5) from single to multiple dosing. CYP2C19 activity was low (metabolic AUC ratio < 0.1) in four patients with moderate to severe liver disease even though they were genetically extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers (*1/*1 or *1/*2). Three patients required lower daily doses than the standard regimen of 750 mg every 8 h to achieve target concentrations and maintain virologic suppression at < 50 RNA copies ml-1 (up to 20 months). CONCLUSIONS: Acquired CYP2C19 deficiency from moderate or severe liver disease resulted in decreased M8 formation. Long-term HIV suppression is possible using low nelfinavir doses in patients with liver disease.

Adult↗

Virologic responses to a ritonavir--saquinavir-containing regimen in patients who had previously failed nelfinavir.

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of a second protease inhibitor in patients who failed an initial protease inhibitor is unclear but believed to be low. It has been postulated, however, that patients who fail nelfinavir may respond differently. We therefore assessed the virologic response to a ritonavir-saquinavir-containing regimen in patients who had previously failed nelfinavir. METHODS: A total of 26 patients enrolled in the nelfinavir clinical trials AG506 and AG511 at our two sites who failed (two consecutive HIV viral loads > 5000 copies/ml; branched DNA assay) were switched to a combination of stavudine 40 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, ritonavir 400 mg twice daily and saquinavir 400 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The mean viral load at enrollment in this study was 46 674 copies/ml (range, 1075-146400 copies/ml). The median CD4 cell count was 222 x 10(6)/l (range, 82-448 x 10(6)/l). The median duration of nelfinavir use with a detectable viral load before the switch occurred was 48 weeks. Two patients discontinued the study at 3 weeks. All of the remaining patients (n = 24) reached undetectable viral loads (< 500 copies/ml) that were sustained at week 24 in 17 (71%) out of 24 subjects. The most frequent baseline mutations in the protease gene prior to switching were D30N (13 out of 18), N88D (eight out of 18) and M36I (eight out of 18). The presence or absence of these mutations was not predictive of a short-term virologic response. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who failed a nelfinavir-containing regimen responded to a switch to a combination regimen with saquinavir-ritonavir.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Therapeutic drug monitoring of nelfinavir and indinavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individuals.

BACKGROUND: Both virological failure and the toxicity of HIV protease inhibitors have been related to interindividual variability of plasma drug concentrations. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers the possibility to detect patients with drug concentrations outside therapeutic ranges, who can subsequently benefit from dose modifications. METHODS: ATHENA was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a TDM group, in which the results of drug concentration measurements plus advice were reported to their treating physician, or to a control group for whom TDM results were not reported. This analysis refers to treatment-naive patients who started a regimen containing indinavir or nelfinavir before November 1999. FINDINGS: A total of 147 patients were randomly assigned: 92 to nelfinavir, 55 to indinavir. After one year of follow-up significantly fewer patients in the TDM group had discontinued nelfinavir or indinavir than in the control group: 17.4 versus 39.7%. This was mainly driven by a significantly lower rate of discontinuation because of virological failure in nelfinavir patients: 2.4% in the TDM group versus 17.6% in the control group, and by a non-significant difference in the rate of discontinuation because of toxicity in indinavir patients: 14.3% in the TDM group versus 29.6% in the control group. In a non-completer equals failure analysis of all randomized patients, the TDM group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients with a viral load below 500 copies after 12 months of treatment (78.2 versus 55.1%). INTERPRETATION: TDM of nelfinavir and indinavir in treatment-naive patients improves treatment response.

Adult↗

Therapeutic drug monitoring of indinavir and nelfinavir to assess adherence to therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy is required to obtain an optimal long term virologic response rate of HIV-1-infected children. Plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors (PIs) outside the limits of the reference values indicate nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in adults. We studied during a 2-year follow-up period routinely taken plasma protease inhibitor concentrations to assess adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected children. METHODS: In 40 children (ages 3 months to 18 years) blood samples were taken at regular outpatient visits every 12 weeks after the start of highly active antiretroviral therapy and analyzed for plasma concentrations of indinavir or nelfinavir by high performance liquid chromatography and for plasma HIV-1 RNA load. The percentage of samples fulfilling the criteria for adherence was assessed for each child by three methods. For each sample a concentration ratio was calculated by dividing the concentration in that sample by the time-adjusted population value. According to Method 1 concentration ratios below or above concentration ratio limits (CORALs) of population data obtained in adults were highly indicative of nonadherence. Because many children have high PI levels, Method 2 evaluated plasma samples of PIs with only the lower CORAL. According to Method 3 only children with plasma samples below the limit of quantification (0.04 mg/l) were considered noncompliant. Differences in adherence rate between virologic responders and virologic nonresponders and between adherence rates and the two protease inhibitors were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of HIV-1 RNA levels >500 copies/ml in children was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-one children started treatment with indinavir, and nine children started treatment with nelfinavir. The median adherence rates for indinavir as determined by methods 1, 2 and 3 were 54% [interquartile range (IQR), 25 to 69%], 67% (IQR 50 to 92%) and 80% (IQR 63 to 100%), respectively. For nelfinavir median adherence rates of 60% (IQR 39 to 75%), 100% (IQR 67 to 100%) and 100% (IQR 100 to 100%) were observed. Adherence rates calculated with Method 2 were significantly higher in virologic responders ( = 0.04). Adherence rates calculated with Methods 2 and 3 were significantly lower in children using indinavir compared with those using nelfinavir ( = 0.02 and = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Calculation of adherence rates using the lower limit of CORALs of indinavir or nelfinavir in children may be a useful measurement for the assessment of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in children.

Adolescent↗

Nelfinavir plasma levels under twice-daily and three-times-daily regimens: high interpatient and low intrapatient variability.

Nelfinavir has been recently approved as a twice-daily (BID) dose regimen, but no evaluation of the influence of this regimen change on patients' protease inhibitor exposure has been published. The aim of this study was to compare trough plasma concentrations of nelfinavir obtained under the 1250-mg b.i.d regimen with the levels achieved with the original 750-mg three-times-daily (TID) regimen in 56 HIV-infected patients. Blood samples were obtained at steady state before the morning dose of nelfinavir. Plasma levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Eleven and 45 patients were following TID and BID regimens, respectively. Trough concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 11.74 mg/L and from 0.36 to 10.57 mg/L under TID and BID regimens, respectively. Large interpatient (coefficient of variation: 153%) and modest intrapatient (45%) variabilities of nelfinavir levels were observed. Twenty-one patients (38%) and six patients (11%) had levels above and below, respectively, the trough nelfinavir range (1.0--3.0 mg/L) recommended by the manufacturer. Trough levels are not affected by the dosing regimen; they mainly reflect the important interindividual variability, while remaining fairly stable over time. Many subjects had plasma levels repeatedly outside the assumed therapeutic range. Dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring may contribute to optimizing antiretroviral therapy.

Adult↗

The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-1-infected children.

The authors investigated the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-1-infected children in a dosage of 30 mg/kg every 8 hours and 45 mg/kg every 12 hours in 12 HIV-1-infected children (aged 2.1 to 10.8 years) participating in an open-label study of nelfinavir in combination with stavudine and lamivudine. Median values of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of nelfinavir 30 mg/kg every-8-hours (n = 8) and 45 mg/kg every 12 hours (n = 10) were, respectively, for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours, 90.5 and 71.9 h x microg/mL, for the trough concentration 1.9 and 1.0 microg/mL, and for the maximal concentration 6.3 and 5.2 microg/mL. Overall, a 7-fold interpatient variability was observed for the exposure to nelfinavir. Nelfinavir 30 mg/kg every-8-hours or 45 mg/kg every 12 hours in HIV-1-infected children generally resulted in plasma concentrations higher than those obtained in adults. However, due to a large interpatient variability in the exposure, individual dosage adjustments based on plasma concentrations may be necessary for both dosing regimens to ensure optimal treatment.

Administration, Oral↗

Sildenafil does not alter nelfinavir pharmacokinetics.

The objective of this study was to investigate if sildenafil influences the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. Five HIV-infected patients on steady-state nelfinavir-containing therapy were subject to pharmacokinetic sampling for nelfinavir concentration twice: without sildenafil and with sildenafil 25 mg as a single dose. There were no differences in the AUC, T(max), or C(max) of nelfinavir. In a similar design, two patients on indinavir and two patients on ritonavir combined with saquinavir were studied. In accordance with the literature, neither of these two treatments was affected. It is concluded that nelfinavir pharmacokinetics were unaffected by concomitant intake of a single dose of sildenafil.

Adult↗

Nelfinavir induces necrosis of 3T3F44-2A adipocytes by oxidative stress.

Protease inhibitor treatment strongly diminishes mortality in HIV-infected patients. This treatment has also been associated with lipodystrophy and has been shown to alter adipocyte differentiation. The protease inhibitor nelfinavir has been indirectly implicated in the appearance and development of lipodystrophic syndrome, as well as in adipocyte cell death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nelfinavir on the 3T3-F442A adipocyte cell line. Nelfinavir (30 microM) induced cell death of 3T3-F442A adipocytes by a necrotic process that was not mediated by TNF-alpha. Treatment of cells with this protease inhibitor led to a significant increase in expression of the heme oxygenase-1 gene that could be reduced by 100 microM of the antioxidant ascorbate. Moreover, ascorbate had a protective effect on nelfinavir-induced necrosis, decreasing the percentage of necrotic cells by 70%. Our results show that nelfinavir induces necrosis of adipocytes mediated by a cellular increase of reactive oxygen species. This deleterious effect could be counterbalanced by ascorbate.

3T3 Cells↗

Nelfinavir and nevirapine side effects during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The risk of vertical transmission of HIV has been substantially reduced since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); however, the impact of taking HAART during pregnancy on the woman, the fetus and the infant is not yet understood. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare tolerability, safety and efficacy of nelfinavir- or nevirapine-containing HAART in a cohort of pregnant and non-pregnant HIV-infected women in The Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: In 15 centres specializing in HIV in The Netherlands, data on patient characteristics, HAART, adverse events, viral load response, mode of delivery and HIV status of the neonate were obtained from medical records of HIV-infected pregnant women who received HAART during pregnancy between January 1997 and June 2003. These data were compared with a control group of HIV-infected non-pregnant women that was obtained from the Dutch HIV-monitoring foundation database. RESULTS: Data from 186 pregnant and 186 non-pregnant HIV-infected women using a nelfinavir- or nevirapine-containing regimen were analysed. The pregnant women were younger, used a nelfinavir containing regimen more often, had higher CD4 cell counts and lower HIV RNA levels. Nelfinavir-related gastrointestinal symptoms (P < 0.001), hyperglycaemia (P < 0.001) and nevirapine-related hepatotoxicity (P = 0.003) occurred more often during pregnancy. The risk of nevirapine-induced rash was not increased. No major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir- or nevirapine-containing HAART regimens during pregnancy are well tolerated. Side effects of antiretroviral therapy are more frequent in pregnant than in non-pregnant women.

Adult↗

Glucose metabolism, lipid, and body fat changes in antiretroviral-naive subjects randomized to nelfinavir or efavirenz plus dual nucleosides.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if particular components of antiretroviral drug regimens are associated with greater insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and peripheral lipoatrophy. METHODS: Metabolic and body composition variables were measured prospectively over 64 weeks in 334 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected subjects who were randomized to receive nelfinavir, efavirenz, or both, combined with zidovudine/lamivudine or didanosine/stavudine in a factorial design, multicenter trial. Subjects assigned to efavirenz (n = 110) were compared with those assigned to nelfinavir (n = 99); subjects assigned to zidovudine/lamivudine (n = 154) were compared with those assigned to didanosine/stavudine (n = 180). A subset of 157 subjects had serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. RESULTS: Lipid measures increased in all groups. Greater increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol occurred with efavirenz than with nelfinavir. Greater increases in total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol occurred with stavudine and didanosine than with zidovudine/lamivudine. There were no differences in insulin resistance in the comparisons. After initial increases in the first 16 weeks, median limb fat decreased. Greater changes in percentage changes in limb fat occurred with didanosine/stavudine (-16.8%) than with zidovudine/lamivudine (+4.0%; P < 0.001 for overall change from baseline) and with nelfinavir (-13.1%) compared with efavirenz (+1.8%; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Over 64 weeks, all regimens were associated with increases in lipids but insulin resistance did not differ between groups. Regimens containing didanosine/stavudine and regimens containing nelfinavir were associated with greater loss of limb fat.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Risk of birth defects associated with nelfinavir exposure during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the human teratogenic risk of the protease inhibitor, nelfinavir mesylate, used to treat human immunodeficiency virus. METHODS: This study used a subset of data from the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry, which was designed to monitor prenatal exposures to antiretroviral therapy and detect a potential increase in the risk of birth defects. The registry uses a prospective exposure-registration cohort design. All records of pregnant women exposed to nelfinavir, used alone or in combination, were extracted and analyzed. The prevalence of birth defects was compared with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) population-based surveillance system. RESULTS: Through July 2002, the registry had monitored 915 live births exposed to nelfinavir. Among 301 first-trimester exposures, there were 9 birth defects, for a prevalence of 3% (95% confidence interval 1.4, 5.6). This rate is not significantly different from the CDC's system, which had a prevalence of 3.1 per 100 live births (95% confidence interval 3.1, 3.2; P =.99). There was no consistent pattern among reported birth defects. CONCLUSION: Adequate numbers of first-trimester exposures to nelfinavir have been monitored to detect a 2-fold increase in the prevalence of overall birth defects. No such increases have been detected when compared with the CDC rate. However, the numbers are not sufficient to detect any increased rate of specific defects. Although nelfinavir should only be used in pregnancy if the benefits outweigh the potential risks, the findings from this study should provide some assurance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants isolated from patients treated with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir.

Nelfinavir mesylate (formerly AG1343) is a potent and selective inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease approved for the treatment of individuals infected with HIV. Nucleotide sequence analysis of protease genes from plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA revealed a unique aspartic acid (D)-to-asparagine (N) substitution at residue 30 (D30N) in 25 of 55 patients treated with nelfinavir for a median of 13 weeks. Although the appearance of D30N was occasionally associated with concurrent or sequential emergence of other changes (e.g., at residues 35, 36, 46, 71, 77, and 88), genotypic changes associated with phenotypic resistance to other protease inhibitors were not observed (e.g., at residues 48, 50, 82, and 84) or were only rarely observed (e.g., at residue 90). In phenotypic assays, viral isolates with high-level resistance to nelfinavir remained susceptible to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir (formerly VX-478/141W94). Similar results were observed in phenotypic assays utilizing HIV-1 NL4-3, which contained the D30N substitution alone or in combination with substitutions at other residues (e.g., residues 46, 71, and 88). These data indicate that the initial pathway of resistance to nelfinavir is unique and suggest that individuals failing short courses of nelfinavir-containing regimens may respond to regimens containing other protease inhibitors.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

[Clinical and pharmacokinetic interactions between methadone and nelfinavir (Nemesia study)].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients on methadone maintenance therapy who are administered nelfinavir show a decrease in methadone plasma levels. However, the clinical relevance of this fact is seldom significant because it does not correlate with the appearance of opioid withdrawal symptoms (OWS). The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and pharmacokinetic interactions between methadone and nelfinavir. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective multicenter study of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients on stable methadone therapy who initiated nelfinavir was performed. To determine the presence of OWS, 2 questionnaires, objective and subjective, were administered at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. A pharmacokinetic study measuring the minimal plasmatic concentration of methadone was done at baseline and at week 4. RESULTS: 29 patient were included. In 7 patients who underwent pharmacokinetic studies, the minimal plasmatic concentration of methadone decreased after 4 weeks of nelfinavir treatment from 6.889 ng/ml to 4.354 ng/ml (37%; p = 0.046). However the results of the questionnaires did not show the significant OWS, which precluded an increase in the dose of methadone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients under stable methadone treatment, antiretroviral therapy including nelfinavir does not require any significant modification of methadone dose. The decrease in methadone plasmatic levels does not correlate with OWS.

Adult↗

High variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients with a sustained virological response on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infected patients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir. RESULTS: The interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level. CONCLUSION: Although performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.

Adult↗

Limited effect of food composition on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir administered twice daily.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of two different breakfasts on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir under steady state conditions. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were evaluated in a 17 days open labeled one sequence crossover study evaluating the effect of a 'light' breakfast (350 kcal) compared to a standard breakfast (800 kcal) on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir at steady state during 1250 mg twice daily (BID) administration. RESULTS: After administration with a standard breakfast higher concentrations of nelfinavir were observed during the terminal phase than after administration with a 'light' breakfast. The comparison of the log subset 10 transformed parameters C subset 1-hr-postdose, AUC subset 0-12h, C subset max, and C subset 12 hours, showed that the AUC subset 0-12h was decreased by 13% (P = 0.01) after administration with the 'light' breakfast. Nelfinavir 1250 mg BID was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although drug intake with a 'light' breakfast' showed a statistically significant decrease for nelfinavir AUC subset 0-12h, this marginal 13% reduction is not considered clinically relevant. No significant effects of the two different breakfasts were found for the remaining three parameters tested C subset 1-hr-postdose, C subset max, and C subset 12 hours.

Adult↗

[HIV genotypic mutation selectively induced by the protease inhibitor nelfinavir at codon 30. Case series and consequences for antiretroviral management].

In a survey of 247 HIV-infected patients which received at least six months of combined antiretroviral therapy including the protease inhibitor nelfinavir during the last two years (2000-2001), the specific primary genotypic mutation D30N (with or without the minor mutation N88D), was detected in only four of the 149 (2.7%) subjects who received genotypization after virological failure. Three of these cases of primary nelfinavir resistance occurred among the 84 patients who were protease inhibitor- and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-na ve, while the last episode was registered in a female patient treated since five years, who received an indinavir-based therapy of nearly 12-month duration (interrupted because of untoward kidney effects). During the subsequent follow-up, the substitution of nelfinavir had a favourable laboratory and clinical outcome in all reported patients who continued a different highly active anti-HIV treatment, while a significantly less positive virological and immunological response was seen in all the remaining subjects, and especially in those who experienced virological failure after undergoing at least two prior changes of combined antiretroviral therapy, and were borne by a broad spectrum of protease gene mutations (save those regarding codons 30 and 88). Due to its exclusive resistance pattern, nelfinavir may represent a favorable first-line choice among protease inhibitor-based regimens, since it may spare further treatment options even in the same pharmacological class. In fact, cross-resistance with other protease inhibitors may be limited also in patients experiencing prior long-term antiretroviral therapy, from second-line to rescue regimens, provided that they were pre-treated with drugs other than nelfinavir.

Anti-HIV Agents↗