PubMed1990
In an effort to investigate the structure-function relationship of HLA class II molecules vis-à-vis alloepitope expression, cloned T-cell reagents were used to define polymorphic epitopes associated with DR and DQ molecules. DNA sequences of genes encoding allelic or isotypic DR or DQ molecules that appear to express the same T-cell-defined epitopes were compared in an attempt to identify association of shared sequences with shared epitopes. When sequence sharing is associated with shared epitope expression, we suggest that it is the shared sequence that encodes the epitope in question. Based on the hypothetical three-dimensional structure of the class II molecule, an approximation is made as to which parts of the HLA class II molecule are involved in alloepitope expression. T-cell clones were generated from cells primed against HLA-DR2 haplotypes representing the cellularly defined subgroups Dw2 or Dw21 (previously designated MN2, FJ0, or Tb24). Those clones determined to be DR- or DQ-directed based on monoclonal antibody inhibition assays were tested by panel cell analysis utilizing DR2-positive and DR2-negative target cells. The data support the concept that amino acids 67, 70, 71, and 74 for DR molecules and amino acids 57, 70, and 71 for DQ molecules, which appear to comprise one face of the alpha helix, are of primary importance in T-cell recognition. In other cases, sharing of both the second hypervariable region (amino acids 25-33) and the third hypervariable region (amino acids 67-74) appears necessary to explain epitope sharing for DR molecules. We emphasize that the involvement of these two hypervariable regions may indicate that alloepitope expression involves the complex of class II molecule plus peptide, with the second HVR primarily involved in determining which peptides are bound and the third in T-cell receptor (TcR) recognition and/or peptide binding; we do not rule out that conformational changes of the second HVR can induce conformational changes in the third HVR. Finally, shared alloepitopes detected by some clones could not be explained based on shared primary sequences.