Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Modafinil”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Treatment of the alcoholic organic brain syndrome: double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical, psychometric and electroencephalographic mapping studies with modafinil.

In a double-blind study 40 abstinent hospitalized male patients with an alcoholic organic brain syndrome (OBS; ICD 9: 291.2) were treated for 6 weeks with either placebo or 200 mg modafinil b.i.d. Modafinil (CRL 40476) is a vigilance-promoting, putative central alpha 1-adrenergic agonist with a pharmacological profile quite different from that of amphetamine. Clinical investigations demonstrated that the spontaneous remission of the alcoholic OBS was augmented and accelerated by modafinil, which was found significant as compared with placebo by confirmatory statistics in the target variable, the Clinical Global Impression scale. The drug was well tolerated. Psychometric tests revealed significant improvement of the noopsyche after modafinil as compared with placebo, while the thymopsyche and psychophysiological measurements were not affected. Electroencephalographic mapping showed significant differences between the central effects of modafinil and placebo indicating an improvement of vigilance under modafinil. Typical vigilance-promoting properties were seen after acute drug administration, were less evident before the morning dose after chronic treatment but re-occurred after super-imposed daily drug administration. Thus, our clinical, psychometric and neurophysiological investigations in alcoholic OBS patients demonstrated a therapeutic effect of modafinil in the early phase of abstinence.

Adult↗

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of modafinil in the treatment of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome.

Some patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) remain subjectively and objectively sleepy despite using effective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The aim of this single center study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the novel wake-promoting medication modafinil in the treatment of CPAP-resistant daytime sleepiness. Thirty sleep apneics receiving effective CPAP therapy (objective use, 6.5 +/- 1.1 h/night) received daily single doses of 400 mg modafinil or placebo for 2 wk in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of both 2-wk treatment periods. Treatment periods were separated by a 1-wk washout. Modafinil had no effect on sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (p > 0.1); however, significant improvements in alertness were found with the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (modafinil 18.3 +/- 3.9 min; placebo, 16.6 +/- 5.0 min; p < 0.02). No significant treatment-related improvements in cognitive performance or quality of life were found with modafinil (all p > 0.05). There was a significant reduction in CPAP use on modafinil compared to placebo (6.3 +/- 1 h/ night; 6.5 +/- 1, p = 0.03). This study suggests that modafinil may improve some aspects of alertness in patients with SAHS who remain sleepy during CPAP therapy, but further studies are required to assess the significance of the reduction in CPAP use.

Administration, Oral↗

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of modafinil given alone or in combination with methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.

The potential for a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction between modafinil and methylphenidate, each at steady state, was investigated in an open-label, randomized, single-period study in 32 healthy male and female volunteers. All subjects received modafinil once daily orally for 28 days (200 mg on Days 1-7 and 400 mg on Days 8-28). On Days 22 to 28, half of the subjects also received 20 mg of methylphenidate orally 8 hours after their modafinil dose. PK profiles of modafinil were obtained on Days 21 and 28 and compared between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in the mean changes in PK parameters for modafinil. Parameters for its metabolites were also similar between the groups, and all treatments were well tolerated. The results indicate that administration of low-dose methylphenidate 8 hours after treatment with modafinil does not appear to alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of modafinil in healthy volunteers.

Adult↗

An evaluation of the abuse potential of modafinil using methylphenidate as a reference.

Modafinil is a unique wake-promoting agent. Preclinical studies indicate a mechanism of action which is distinct from that of amphetamine or methylphenidate. To compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of modafinil, methylphenidate, and placebo in humans, a double-blind Latin square crossover study was conducted in 24 male volunteers with a history of polysubstance abuse that included the stimulant cocaine. Each subject was given single oral doses of methylphenidate (45 mg or 90 mg), modafinil (200 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg) and placebo. Measures of subjective, behavioural, and physiological responses were evaluated at fixed intervals during 72 h after each dosing occasion. Subjects discriminated both modafinil and methylphenidate from placebo. Subjects liked the effects of both drugs. However, modafinil differed from methylphenidate in its lack of a significant response on the Amphetamine Scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The profile of physiological effects for modafinil differed from methylphenidate in that it showed greater inhibition of observed and reported sleep, less facilitation of orthostatic tachycardia and less reduction of caloric intake. These findings are consistent with preclinical pharmacological data suggesting that modafinil is not an amphetamine-like agent.

Adult↗

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of modafinil in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy.

Seventy-five patients meeting international diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy enrolled in a 6-week, three-period, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received placebo, modafinil 200 mg, or modafinil 400 mg in divided doses (morning and noon). Evaluations occurred at baseline and at the end of each 2-week period. Compared with placebo, modafinil 200 and 400 mg significantly increased the mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test by 40% and 54%, with no significant difference between the two doses. Modafinil, 200 and 400 mg, also reduced the combined number of daytime sleep episodes and periods of severe sleepiness noted in sleep logs. The likelihood of falling asleep as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was equally reduced by both modafinil dose levels. There were no effects on nocturnal sleep initiation, maintenance, or architecture, nor were there any effects on sleep apnea or periodic leg movements. Neither dose interfered with the patients' ability to nap voluntarily during the day nor with their quantity or quality of nocturnal sleep. Modafinil produced no changes in blood pressure or heart rate in either normotensive or hypertensive patients. The only significant adverse effects were seen at the 400-mg dose, which was associated with more nausea and more nervousness than either placebo or the 200-mg dose. As little as a 200-mg daily dose of modafinil is therefore an effective and well-tolerated treatment of excessive daytime somnolence in narcoleptic persons.

Adult↗

Modafinil improves recovery after general anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Recovery from general anesthesia often involves residual sedation, drowsiness, fatigue, and lack of energy that may last hours to days. Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting drug approved for patients with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. We evaluated the effect of single doses of modafinil (200 mg) and placebo in patients recovering from general anesthesia. Thirty-four subjects participated in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study approved by our IRB. Preoperatively, patients were asked to rate various symptoms they had experienced over the previous 24-h using a verbal analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 10 as well as discrete scale when indicated. Postoperatively, once the patient was able to tolerate oral intake and met our institutional discharge criteria, the study drug (modafinil 200 mg or placebo) was administered with a sip of water. Patients were contacted 24 (1) hours after dosing to evaluate postdischarge symptoms. Patients in the placebo group reported significantly more postoperative fatigue (4.8 [3.3] versus 1.4 [1.8]), exhaustion (4.3 [3.3] versus 2.4 [3.1]), or degree of feeling worn out (4.7 [3.6] versus 2.9 [2.4]). Significantly more patients reported moderate to severe fatigue in the placebo group (65% versus 12%). Two major themes of "alertness" and "energy" were expressed by 71% of the patients receiving modafinil versus 18% of those receiving placebo. Patients recovering from general anesthesia can significantly benefit from modafinil. IMPLICATIONS: Modafinil significantly reduces fatigue and improves feelings of alertness and energy in postoperative patients. Patients recovering from general anesthesia can significantly benefit from modafinil administration.

Adolescent↗

A review of the use of modafinil for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Modafinil (Provigil) is a novel wakefulness-promoting agent that has been shown to have greater efficacy than placebo in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. In particular, three large, drug-company sponsored trials of a film-coated formulation of modafinil (modafinil-ADHD; Sparlon) in children and adolescents with ADHD demonstrated consistent improvements in ADHD symptoms compared with placebo. Mean reductions in symptom ratings (measured using the ADHD-Rating Scale-IV school version questionnaire) ranged from 15.0 to 19.7 (7.3 to 10.1 for placebo). The most common adverse events were insomnia, headache and decreased appetite. Modafinil was generally well tolerated with most side effects considered mild to moderate in severity. Modafinil may have advantages over current therapies for ADHD in that it can be administered once daily and has fewer reinforcing properties than traditional stimulants. Modafinil could potentially be a valuable new treatment option for patients with ADHD. However, rigorous comparative studies with current first-line treatments for ADHD and longer-term independent studies are necessary before modafinil's role in the treatment of ADHD can be fully established.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Effects of modafinil on cognitive performance and alertness during sleep deprivation.

The performance- and alertness-sustaining/restoring effects of modafinil during sleep deprivation in normal, healthy adults were reviewed. Results indicate that modafinil is efficacious for sustaining/restoring objective performance and alertness during sleep deprivation with few adverse effects. At appropriate dosages, modafinil restores performance and alertness to non-sleep deprived levels. Modafinil also impairs post-sleep deprivation recovery sleep, but from the few studies available addressing this issue, it is unclear whether these sleep impairments translate into post-sleep performance impairments. Further research is needed to determine whether modafinil restores performance on simple cognitive tasks only or whether modafinil additionally restores executive functions (e.g., abstract thought, critical reasoning, planning, decision-making, situational awareness, and effective judgment) which are critical in most modern operational settings. In addition, studies are needed to determine whether modafinil use during sleep deprivation is preferable to that of other available controlled stimulants (such as dextroamphetamine) or non-controlled stimulants (such as caffeine). Such studies would be comprised of direct, head-to-head comparisons among various stimulants across a range of dosages.

Arousal↗

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of modafinil administered alone or in combination with dextroamphetamine in healthy volunteers.

The potential for a drug-drug interaction between modafinil and dextroamphetamine, each at steady state, was investigated in an open-label, randomized, single-period studyin 32 healthy male and female volunteers. All subjects received modafinil orally once daily for 28 days (200 mg on Days 1-7; 400 mg on Days 8-28). On Days 22 to 28, half of the subjects also received dextroamphetamine (20 mg) orally 7 hours after modafinil. Samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) profiling were obtained on Days 21 and 28. The mean changes in PK parameters for modafinil and its two circulating metabolites between the two groups were not statistically significantly different, except Cmax for modafinil acid. Adverse events obtained in the two groups were similar and mild or moderate in nature. The results indicate that administration of low-dose dextroamphetamine in this dosing regimen does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of modafinil. The combination has a similar tolerability profile as modafinil alone.

Adult↗

Preliminary studies on the structure-activity and time-effect relations of the central stimulating effects of modafinil in mice.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the structure-activity and time-effect relations of the central stimulating effects of modafinil for further pharmaceutical design and development and rational use of this kind of stimulant. METHOD: Male mice served as subjects. The experiment was divided into two parts: 1) comparison between the dose (60, 120, 240 mg/kg) and temporal features of the effects of modafinil and its two derivatives on locomotor activity of mice; 2) Observation of the stimulating effects of modafinil (120 mg/kg) given during the day or night. RESULT: Modafinil could significantly increase the locomotor activity of mice in a dose-dependent way, the effect was best observed at the concentration of 120 mg/kg. The stimulating action of modafinil was increased by chlorination, but decreased by methylation. The central stimulating effect of modafinil showed no significant circadian difference. CONCLUSION: The central stimulating effect of modafinil shows dose and time-related features. The effect tends to be enhanced by Chlorination but reduced by methylation.

Animals↗

Differential effects of a new central adrenergic agonist--modafinil--and D-amphetamine on sleep and early morning behaviour in young healthy volunteers.

Modafinil (CRL 40476) is a recently developed central alpha adrenergic agonist with vigilance-promoting properties. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled sleep laboratory study, its single-dose effects on objectively and subjectively evaluated sleep, morning awakening, and early morning behaviour were investigated and compared with amphetamine. Ten young healthy volunteers of both sexes spent 12 nights in the sleep laboratory: one adaptation night, one baseline night, five drug nights (100 mg and 200 mg modafinil; 10 mg and 20 mg d-amphetamine; placebo) and five subsequent washout nights. The drugs were administered in one week intervals according to a Latin square design. Somnopolygraphic investigations were performed between 22h30 and 06h00. Subjects received the drug orally half an hour before bedtime. A self-rating scale for sleep and awakening quality and early morning behavior was completed subsequent to the morning toilet. Thereafter, noopsychic and thymopsychic variables were evaluated utilizing a psychometric test-battery. Statistical analyses of objective sleep variables demonstrated that modafinil causes no significant changes as compared to a placebo. Sleep initiation remained unchanged after all of the drugs, while sleep maintenance was impaired dose-dependently after d-amphetamine. Thus, total sleep time and sleep efficiency decreased significantly after 20 mg d-amphetamine as compared to the placebo and modafinil. In regard to sleep architecture a reduction of sleep stage 2 and rapid eye movement-sleep occurred under d-amphetamine while modafinil did not exhibit such an effect. Subjective sleep quality was significantly better after modafinil than after the reference compound. Subjective awakening quality and well-being in the morning did not show any significant findings. Furthermore, no differences were observed between the placebo and the other drugs concerning objective awakening quality (evaluated by psychometric tests). Critical flicker frequency increased significantly after 20 mg d-amphetamine as compared to the placebo. Pulse rate and evening and morning blood pressure remained unchanged. These data stress the necessity to differentiate between "vigility-increasing" properties of amphetamine and "vigilance-promoting" properties of modafinil.

Adult↗

Modafinil, d-amphetamine and placebo during 64 hours of sustained mental work. I. Effects on mood, fatigue, cognitive performance and body temperature.

Modafinil is an alerting substance that is considered safer than amphetamine with fewer side effects. Although modafinil has been used successfully to treat narcolepsy, relatively little is known about its ability to ameliorate fatigue and declines in mental performance due to sleep deprivation (SD) in a normal population. Forty-one military subjects received either 300 mg of modafinil, 20 mg of d-amphetamine, or placebo on 3 separate occasions during 64 hours of continuous cognitive work and sleep loss. Three drug treatments were given: at 23.30 hours and 05.30 hours during the first and second SD nights, respectively, and once at 15.30 hours during the third day of continuous work. Subjective estimates of mood, fatigue and sleepiness, as well as objective measures of reaction time, logical reasoning and short-term memory clearly showed better performance with both modafinil and amphetamine relative to placebo. Both modafinil and amphetamine maintained or increased body temperature compared to the natural circadian cycle observed in the placebo group. Also, from subject debriefs at the end of the study, modafinil elicited fewer side-effects than amphetamine, although more than the placebo group. Modafinil appears to be a good alternative to amphetamine for counteracting the debilitating mood and cognitive effects of sleep loss during sustained operations.

Journal Article↗

Modafinil: a novel stimulant for the treatment of narcolepsy.

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a common and debilitating symptom of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders. Modafinil is a novel stimulant which effectively treats EDS, yet lacks many of the undesirable side-effects commonly encountered with currently available compounds. The specific mode of action of modafinil is not well understood, but it may promote sleep by indirectly influencing adrenergic or GABAergic neurotransmission. Modafinil-induced wakefulness is not associated with rebound hypersomnolence or the potential for abuse as is often encountered with other stimulants such as amphetamines. At typical therapeutic doses, modafinil may produce dry mouth but generally has a low incidence of minor side-effects. Many preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of modafinil in promoting wakefulness and vigilance in normal subjects and in those with EDS. Modafinil significantly improves the EDS of narcolepsy and also may improve the EDS of idiopathic hypersomnia and obstructive sleep apnoea. Modafinil's low prevalence of side-effects, minimal potential for abuse, and lack of rebound hypersomnia indicate that it has potential to become a widely prescribed drug for the treatment of narcolepsy.

Journal Article↗

Modafinil--medical considerations for use in sustained operations.

An understanding of the consequences of sustained operations involving prolonged sleep deprivation is important to the military. Losses in cognitive performance of the order of 30% after one night and 60% after two nights of sleep loss have been shown to occur in several studies. Napping strategies have been proposed as one coping strategy for these performance decrements. An alternate solution is the use of stimulants. Modafinil may offer a safer alternative to more commonly used psychostimulants. It has been shown to counteract the effects of sleep deprivation with fewer side effects than amphetamine. Recent studies on the effects of modafinil during sleep deprivation are reviewed and compared with those of other stimulants such as amphetamine and caffeine, and to prophylactic naps. Recommendations are proposed for the use of modafinil in sustained military missions. For missions of about 24 h, modafinil is preferable to naps. For longer missions, naps should be considered, along with the concomitant use of modafinil to help maintain performance levels. The authors discuss apparent 'overconfidence' and hyperthermia-inducing effects of modafinil, and advise that these effects be taken into account if modafinil is to be used in any mission conducted in the field or in hot environments. It is also recommended that individual sensitivity to the drug should be tested before any mission of a sustained nature, especially if it involves small operational groups or combat aircrew, where the impact of such effects on individuals would be more critical.

Caffeine↗

Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: Modafinil, a novel wake-promoting agent, has been shown to have a similar clinical profile to that of conventional stimulants such as methylphenidate. We were therefore interested in assessing whether modafinil, with its unique pharmacological mode of action, might offer similar potential as a cognitive enhancer, without the side effects commonly experienced with amphetamine-like drugs. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the cognitive enhancing potential of this novel agent using a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests. METHODS: Sixty healthy young adult male volunteers received either a single oral dose of placebo, or 100 mg or 200 mg modafinil prior to performing a variety of tasks designed to test memory and attention. A randomised double-blind, between-subjects design was used. RESULTS: Modafinil significantly enhanced performance on tests of digit span, visual pattern recognition memory, spatial planning and stop-signal reaction time. These performance improvements were complemented by a slowing in latency on three tests: delayed matching to sample, a decision-making task and the spatial planning task. Subjects reported feeling more alert, attentive and energetic on drug. The effects were not clearly dose dependent, except for those seen with the stop-signal paradigm. In contrast to previous findings with methylphenidate, there were no significant effects of drug on spatial memory span, spatial working memory, rapid visual information processing or attentional set-shifting. Additionally, no effects on paired associates learning were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that modafinil selectively improves neuropsychological task performance. This improvement may be attributable to an enhanced ability to inhibit pre-potent responses. This effect appears to reduce impulsive responding, suggesting that modafinil may be of benefit in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Adult↗

Reinforcing effects of modafinil: influence of dose and behavioral demands following drug administration.

RATIONALE: The reinforcing effects of stimulant drugs are modulated by behavioral demands following drug administration. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reinforcing effects of modafinil, a drug with purportedly low abuse potential, under different behavioral demands using a modified progressive-ratio procedure. METHODS: The reinforcing effects of oral modafinil (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) were assessed in six healthy adult volunteers under both performance and relaxation conditions. Performance sessions required volunteers to complete simple arithmetic problems for three 50-min blocks. Relaxation sessions required volunteers to sit quietly in a semi-reclined position in a darkened room for three 50-min blocks. Two sampling sessions (one performance and one relaxation session) always preceded two self-administration sessions (one performance and one relaxation session), and the order of performance and relaxation sessions was constant within a dose condition. RESULTS: Modafinil significantly increased break point and number of capsules earned on the modified progressive-ratio procedure as an increasing function of dose under the performance, but not the relaxation, condition. Modafinil produced comparable stimulant-like subjective ratings under both the performance and relaxation conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present experiment demonstrate that modafinil can function as a reinforcer and that the reinforcing effects of modafinil are influenced by behavioral demands following drug administration, similar to those of other stimulant drugs.

Adult↗

Motor excitability and motor behaviour after modafinil ingestion--a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Modafinil is a novel vigilance-enhancing agent. We were interested if modafinil would also enhance motor excitability and improve motor performance and attention in healthy subjects. Ten volunteers received either a single oral dose of placebo or 200 mg modafinil. A randomized double-blind crossover design was used. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was employed to test intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, the cortical silent period and to obtain stimulus-response curves. In addition, M responses and F waves were recorded. Reaction time tasks, the nine-hole-peg test and the d2 attention test were also applied. These studies were performed prior to and 3 and 24 hours after drug ingestion. Modafinil did not change excitatory or inhibitory properties in the motor cortex. It did not alter corticospinal excitability and alpha motoneuronal excitability. In the modafinil group and in the placebo group, performance of the nine-hole-peg test and the d2 test improved to a similar extend over time. Thus, this study does not demonstrate significant differences between a single dose of modafinil and placebo in healthy subjects.

Adult↗

Effects of modafinil-induced wakefulness on glutamine synthetase regulation in the rat brain.

Changes in the level of glutamine synthetase (GS), an enzyme chiefly found in glial cells, were investigated in the brains of rats treated with modafinil, an awakening drug interfering with central catecholamine function. Two hours (waking period) and 7 h (recovery period) after intra-peritoneal injection of 128 mg/kg modafinil, a significant increase in the level of GS protein was observed by immunotitration in both the locus coeruleus (+30%) and in the frontoparietal cortex (+50%). No changes were observed with 64 mg/kg of modafinil. GS mRNA was quantified in the entire cortex by Northern blot hybridization using an oligonucleotidic GS cDNA probe. A significant increase in the GS-mRNA level (+70%) was observed in the CX of rats 2 h after injection of 128 mg/kg modafinil; the level tended to return to control values 7 h later during the recovery period. The level of glial acid fibrillary protein (GFAP), an astroglial marker, was unchanged after modafinil treatment. These changes in GS levels after modafinil treatment are discussed in terms of neuron-glia interactions in the regulation of brain metabolism during pharmacologically induced wakefulness, excluding possible stress effects.

Animals↗