Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MEPIVACAINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Epidural mepivacaine for cesarean section: effects of a pH-adjusted solution.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical effects of the alkalinization of 2% mepivacaine with epinephrine used for epidural block during cesarean section. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (standard commercial preparation of 2% mepivacaine with epinephrine) study. SETTING: Inpatient obstetric department at a general hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Two groups of 35 patients each receiving either the standard commercial preparation of mepivacaine or the pH-adjusted solution (prepared with the addition of 0.1 meq/ml of sodium bicarbonate to the standard commercial solution). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements of sensory (pinprick) and motor (Bromage's criteria) block were taken at 1- to 2-minute intervals beginning after the completion of the epidural injection. Increasing the pH of the mepivacaine resulted in a significant shortening of the time of analgesia onset (9.3 minutes compared with 16.01 minutes, p less than 0.01) and of peak effect (11.1 minutes compared with 21.2 minutes, p less than 0.01). The alkalinization did not affect duration of the block, intensity of motor block, or mean dose of local anesthetic used. CONCLUSION: The alkalinization allowed the surgery to proceed more rapidly, significantly decreasing the time interval between epidural block and delivery of the infant.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Systemic toxicity with mepivacaine following axillary block in a patient with terminal kidney failure].

As onset time and duration of sensory block are intermediate, mepivacaine is widely used for regional anaesthesia. Few reports of systemic adverse effects are available following nerve blockade with mepivacaine. We report the case of a 54-year-old patient suffering from terminal renal failure who needs the confection of an arteriovenous shunt under axillary brachial plexus block. At completion of the injection of 25 ml (375 mg) of 1.5% mepivacaine the patient presented dysarthria, mental confusion followed by a loss of verbal contact and agitation, but no convulsion or cardiac dysrythmia. The patient received midazolam and surgery was planned the following day under general anaesthesia. Plasma mepivacaine concentration at time of neurological signs was measured at 5.1 microg/ml. Prevention and treatment of systemic toxic effects after regional anaesthesia are discussed.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2004

The effects of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and mepivacaine on the contractility of rat myometrium.

Local anesthetic agents are commonly used for obstetric anesthesia and analgesia. We determined the effects of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and mepivacaine on the contractility of isolated pregnant rat uterine muscle strips. Uterine specimens were obtained from 18- to 21-day pregnant Wistar rats (n = 28). Myometrial strips were obtained from the uterine horns after removing the fetuses and non-uterine tissue, incubated in organ baths and contractions stimulated with oxytocin. When contractions became regular, strips were exposed to increasing concentrations of the study drugs. Mepivacaine (n = 8), ropivacaine (n = 10) and bupivacaine (n = 10) were used at cumulative doses from 10(-8) to 10(-4) mol/L. Two of the local anesthetics, bupivacaine most, ropivacaine least, caused a dose-dependent inhibition of uterine contractility. In contrast, mepivacaine significantly increased uterine contractility. Bupivacaine, ropivacaine and mepivacaine were found to have no effect on frequency of uterine contractions. These results demonstrate that bupivacaine and ropivacaine may inhibit myometrium contractility.

Amides↗
PubMed2006

Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine in relation to 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine, in the prevention of postoperative pain after lower third molar removal. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty patients underwent removal of bilateral lower third molars under local anesthesia (articaine or mepivacaine) in 2 separate appointments, in a double-blind, randomized, and crossed manner. Objective and subjective parameters were recorded for paired comparison of postoperative courses. RESULTS: Duration of analgesia provided by articaine and mepivacaine was 198.00 +/- 25.86, and 125.40 +/- 13.96 min, respectively (P = .02), whereas the duration of anesthesia was 273.80 +/- 15.94 and 216.85 +/- 20.15 min, respectively (P = .06). Both solutions exerted no important effects upon arterial pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Articaine provides a longer period of analgesic effect and a tendency for a longer period of anesthesia as compared to mepivacaine. The presence of a vasoconstrictor agent in local anesthetic solutions does not seem to influence hemodynamic parameters during lower third molar removal in healthy subjects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Experience with mepivacaine paracervical block in an obstetric private practice.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of mepivacaine paracervical block in term, low-risk obstetric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 3-year period all term, low-risk obstetric patients in the author's private practice were offered mepivacaine paracervical block anesthesia. One hundred eighty-two patients received 200 mg mepivacaine with each block. The patients who declined paracervical block were used as a control group to compare Apgar scores, subject to chi 2 analysis. RESULTS: Initial injections were 97.3% successful. Average duration of anesthesia was 59.7 minutes with the first injection. Fetal bradycardia occurred in 13.2% with an average duration of 4.5 minutes. The slightly higher incidence of low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes in the study group was not statistically significant. One neonatal death occurred secondary to group B streptococcal sepsis in the study group. CONCLUSION: Mepivacaine paracervical block remains an anesthetic option in low-risk patients. The high success rate is limited by its short duration of action and the incidence of fetal bradycardia.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1997

Stereoselective determination of mepivacaine in human serum using a brush-type chiral stationary phase and solid-phase extraction.

A stereoselective high-performance liquid chromatography assay method was developed for the quantitation of R-(+)- and S-(-)-mepivacaine in human serum. The assay uses a Pirkle brush-type (S)-tert.-leucine, (R)-1-(alpha-naphthyl)ethylamine stationary phase (Sumichiral OA-4700, 250 x 4 mm I.D.) at ambient temperature with a mobile phase of hexane-ethylenedichloride-absolute methanol (85:10:5, v/v) for the separation of R-(+)- and S-(-)-mepivacaine. The eluents were monitored using UV detection at 220 nm. Isolation of the analytes from serum was performed using a 1-ml C18 solid-phase extraction cartridge with high recovery and selectivity. The detection limits were 100 ng/ml for each enantiomer and the limits of quantitation were 150 ng/ml for both enantiomers. Linear calibration curves in the 150-2400 ng/ml range showed good correlation coefficients (r > 0.9994, n = 3). Precision and accuracy of the method were within 2.1-5.3 and 2.0-3.6%, respectively, for R-(+)-mepivacaine and 2.7-5.7% and 1.7-4.2%, respectively, for S-(-)-mepivacaine.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed1997

HPCE determination of R(+) and S(-) mepivacaine in human serum using a derivatized cyclodextrin and ultraviolet detection.

A high performance capillary electrophoresis assay for the quantitative determination of R(+) and S(-) mepivacaine in human serum is reported using heptakis (2,6-di-O-methyl) beta-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector for the separation of the enantiomers. The background electrolyte was a 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) containing 20 mM heptakis (2,6-di-O-methyl) beta-cyclodextrin and 30 nM hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HTAB). A 72 cm uncoated fused silica capillary was used for the analysis. HTAB was used as the buffer additive to decrease the adsorption of endogenous substances onto the silica wall. To separate the analytes of interest from the endogenous serum substances, a liquid-liquid extraction procedure was used. The extraction recoveries were greater than 70% for both R(+) and S(-) mepivacaine. The detection limits were around 150 ng ml-1 using 1 ml of serum and the limits of quantitation were 200 ng ml-1. The calibration curves were linear over a range of 200-2000 ng ml-1 with R(-) prilocaine as internal standard (IS) and coefficients of determination were greater than 0.999 (n=3). Precision and accuracy of the method were 4.1-7.2 and 2.6-5.9%, respectively, for R(+) mepivacaine and 4.0-7.4 and 3.2-7.4% for respectively, for S(-) mepivacaine. The HPCE method was compared to an existing HPLC method in terms of sensitivity and selectivity for the routine analysis of the drugs.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed1997

Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) and 3% mepivacaine in mandibular first molars.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the anesthetic efficacy of a primary intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine in human mandibular first molars. Injection pain and healing postoperatively were also assessed for the intraosseous injection. STUDY DESIGN: With the use of a repeated-measures design, 42 subjects randomly received intraosseous injections of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 1.8 ml of 3% mepivacaine in a double-blind manner at two successive appointments. The first molar and adjacent teeth were blindly tested with an electric pulp tester at 2-minute cycles for 60 minutes. Anesthetic success was defined as no subject response to the maximum output of the pulp tester (80 reading) for two consecutive readings. RESULTS: Anesthetic success occurred in 74% of the first molars with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and in 45% with 3% mepivacaine. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Overall, onset was rapid for the intraosseous injections, the duration of pulpal anesthesia steadily declined over the 60 minutes, the majority of the subjects had no pain or mild pain with perforation and solution deposition, and 5% of the subjects had delayed healing at the perforation sites. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the primary intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is more successful and results in a longer duration of pulpal anesthesia as compared with 3% mepivacaine in noninflamed mandibular first molars. Most subjects reported no or mild pain during perforation and injection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine in irreversible pulpitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine in mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Intraosseous injection pain, subjective heart rate increase, and pain ratings during endodontic treatment were also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight patients with irreversible pulpitis received conventional inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Electric pulp testing was used to determine pulpal anesthesia. Patients who were positive to the pulp testing, or negative to pulp testing but felt pain during endodontic treatment, received an intraosseous injection of 1.8 ml of 3% mepivacaine. A second intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine (1.8 ml) was given if the first injection was unsuccessful. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients required an initial intraosseous injection because of failure to gain pulpal anesthesia. The inferior alveolar block was 25% successful; the first intraosseous injection increased success to 80%. A second intraosseous injection further increased success to 98%. These differences were significant (p < 0.05). Eight percent (4/48) of the initial intraosseous injections resulted in solution being expressed into the oral cavity: these were considered technique failures. CONCLUSIONS: For mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis, a supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine increased anesthetic success. A second intraosseous injection, when necessary, further improved success.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Repeated episodes of transient radiating back and leg pain following spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine and 2% lidocaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transient radiating back and leg pain defined as pain or dysesthesias in the buttocks, thighs, or calves within 24 to 48 hours after recovery from spinal anesthesia has been described with the use of 2% and 5% lidocaine. These symptoms have also been associated with other local anesthetics such as bupivacaine and tetracaine, although with a much lower incidence. A recent case report and prospective study have described transient radiating back and leg pain occurring following spinal anesthesia with 4% mepivacaine. METHODS: We describe a case of transient radiating back and leg pain following spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine in a patient with unrecognized spinal stenosis who had had repeated episodes of transient radiating back and leg pain associated with lidocaine spinals. RESULTS: Spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine was associated with transient radiating back and leg pain, which was similar in quality and duration to prior episodes following spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Transient radiating back and leg pain may occur with lower concentrations (1.5%) of mepivacaine, as it does with lidocaine. The relationship between transient radiating back and leg pain and spinal stenosis is also discussed.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anaesthesia using isobaric 2% mepivacaine and isobaric 2% lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS) syndrome following subarachnoid anaesthesia was initially associated with hyperbaric lidocaine 50 mg/ml, but has also been reported with most local anaesthetics, including hyperbaric mepivacaine 40 mg/ml. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of TNS after subarachnoid anaesthesia using isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml and isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml. METHODS: Eighty patients of both sexes, ASA class I-II, scheduled for elective minor orthopaedic surgery under subarachnoid anaesthesia, were prospectively included and randomly allocated to receive 40-60 mg of either isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml (Group M) or isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml (Group L). Patients were evaluated on the first postoperative day by one investigator unaware of the grouping, looking for symptoms suggestive of TNS, such as pain or dysaesthesias in the buttocks or lower limbs with or without back pain. RESULTS: TNS symptoms were observed in three patients (7.5%) of Group M and in one patient (2.5%) of Group L, without statistically significant differences between the groups. Symptoms had an abrupt onset and relief, lasted from 45 min to 24 h, and had a complete resolution without sequelae. The only statistically significant difference between groups was longer motor blockade in Group M (P=0.0031). CONCLUSION: In this study TNS was associated with isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml, with an incidence of 7.5%, and with isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml, with an incidence of 2.5%, in patients having orthopaedic procedures in the supine position.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A double-blind study of axillary brachial plexus block by 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine.

Axillary brachial plexus block using 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine was compared in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of two groups of 15 patients. The times to onset of sensory and motor block and to resolution of motor block, as well as the time to onset and degree of post-operative pain were recorded by an observer blinded to the identity of drug. Times to onset of sensory block were similar in the two groups (ropivacaine 10 min, mepivacaine 8 min). Resolution of motor block in the operated hand and the time to first requirement of post-operative analgesia occurred later with ropivacaine (9 h 50 min and 10 h) than with mepivacaine (3 h 50 min and 6 h), P < 0.01 for both measurements. Nine patients who received ropivacaine and two patients who received mepivacaine did not require further post-operative analgesia (P < 0.05). Ropivacaine is less toxic than other long-acting local anaesthetics, and 0.75% ropivacaine may be better for brachial plexus block when fast onset is required and prolonged pain relief is useful.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Effects of intradermal lignocaine and mepivacaine on human cutaneous circulation in areas with histamine-induced neurogenic inflammation.

The vasoconstrictive potencies of lignocaine and mepivacaine were studied in human skin. Lignocaine 0.5%, 0.25% mepivacaine (both plain and mixed with adrenaline or ornipressin), and saline (control) were injected intradermally into skin areas with enhanced perfusion (1% histamine prick). Flux was determined by scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and the size of any eventual pallor was measured. The artificially enhanced flux was increased further by saline, but not altered by the local anaesthetics. Mepivacaine produced a small pallor. Both vasoconstrictors reduced flux significantly and produced a larger pallor. We conclude that both local anaesthetics have only a mild constrictive effect on precapillary vessels. Mepivacaine has, additionally, a constrictor effect on the postcapillary vascular bed, causing pallor. An effective precapillary constriction which reduces the capillary clearance of both local anaesthetics can be achieved only by addition of a vasoconstrictor.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Differential onset of median nerve block: randomized, double-blind comparison of mepivacaine and bupivacaine in healthy volunteers.

We have compared the delay in onset of 1% mepivacaine and 0.33% bupivacaine in different nerve fibre types in 10 volunteers undergoing median nerve blocks, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Hot, cold, pinprick and light touch sensations, compound motor action potentials (CMAP), sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) and skin temperature were recorded at 2-min intervals. Hot, cold, pinprick, light touch sensations, SNAP and CMAP were significantly inhibited, and skin temperature was significantly increased after administration of both agents. The first noticeable reduction in cold sensation was detected later after bupivacaine compared with mepivacaine, but after a delay similar to that of other nerve functions. Bupivacaine and mepivacaine inhibited SNAP and CMAP with a similar time delay to steady-state. Bupivacaine produced steady-state inhibition of hot and cold sensations significantly later than mepivacaine; nevertheless, the sequence that sensory modalities failed, with few exceptions, and the extent of anaesthesia at 40 min were similar for both agents. Our technique provides a novel, multi-modal method of comparing local anaesthetics and related agents over time.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine.

We have compared interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or mepivacaine in 60 healthy patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 15), 0.75% ropivacaine (n = 15), 1% ropivacaine (n = 15) or 2% mepivacaine (n = 15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved sooner with 1% ropivacaine (mean 10 (SD 5) min) than with 0.5% ropivacaine (22 (7) min) (P < 0.001) or 2% mepivacaine (18 (9) min) (P < 0.02). Postoperative analgesia was similar with the three ropivacaine concentrations (11.5 (5) h, 10.7 (2) h and 10 (2.4) h with 0.5%, 0.75% and 1% concentrations, respectively) and nearly two-fold longer compared with 2% mepivacaine (5.1 (2.7) h) (P < 0.001).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

The enhancement of sensory blockade by clonidine selectively added to mepivacaine after midhumeral block.

Clonidine added to local anesthetics results in an increased duration of anesthesia or analgesia after brachial plexus block. We investigated the effect of selective application of clonidine to the median and musculocutaneous nerves during midhumeral block, a technique allowing selective nerve blocks with the use of different local anesthetics. Initially, 58 patients scheduled for hand surgery were prospectively enrolled to receive a midhumeral block. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The Control group (n = 28) received 10 mL of plain mepivacaine 1.5% for each nerve (median, musculocutaneous, ulnar, and radial). The Clonidine group (n = 30) received 10 mL of plain mepivacaine 1.5% for each nerve, but the median and musculocutaneous nerves also received a dose of 50 microg clonidine. One patient in the Control group and two patients in the Clonidine group with a failed block were therefore excluded from the analysis. The onset time of surgical anesthesia was recorded. The durations of sensory and motor blocks were checked every 15 min. The plasma mepivacaine concentration was analyzed from 10 patients in each group. Onset times for complete sensory block were similar between the two groups. Adding 50 microg clonidine to the median and musculocutaneous nerves resulted in a significant increase in the duration of sensory block in these nerves (P < 0.0001). Recovery of motor block was not different between the two groups. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the mean plasma mepivacaine concentration.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2002

The neurotoxicity of local anesthetics on growing neurons: a comparative study of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and ropivacaine.

UNLABELLED: Local anesthetics can be neurotoxic. To test the hypothesis that exposure to local anesthetics produces morphological changes in growing neurons and to compare this neurotoxic potential between different local anesthetics, we performed in vitro cell biological experiments with isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons from chick embryos. The effects of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and ropivacaine were examined microscopically and quantitatively assessed using the growth cone collapse assay. We observed that all local anesthetics produced growth cone collapse and neurite degeneration. However, they showed significant differences in the dose response. The IC(50) values were approximately, 10(-2.8) M for lidocaine, 10(-2.6) M for bupivacaine, 10(-1.6) M for mepivacaine, and 10(-2.5) M for ropivacaine at 15 min exposure. Some reversibility was observed after replacement of the media. At 20 h after washout, bupivacaine and ropivacaine showed insignificant percentage growth cone collapse in comparison to their control values whereas those for lidocaine and mepivacaine were significantly higher than the control values. Larger concentrations of the nerve growth factor (NGF) did not improve this reversibility. In conclusion, local anesthetics produced morphological changes in growing neurons with significantly different IC(50). The reversibility of these changes differed among the four drugs and was not influenced by the NGF concentration. IMPLICATIONS: Local anesthetics induce growth cone collapse and neurite degeneration in the growing neurons. Mepivacaine was safer than lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine for the primary cultured chick neurons.

Amides↗
PubMed1977

Lack of impairment in skills related to driving after intramuscular administration of prilocaine or mepivacaine.

A saline placebo, 3 mg/kg of 2% plain prilocaine, and 3 mg/kg of 2% plain mepivacaine were injected into the deltoid muscles of 10 healthy subjects in a doubleblind, cross-over trial. Before and at 0.5, 1.5 and 3 h after injection, psychomotor skills related to driving were measured. When compared to the saline placebo, neither prilocaine nor mepivacaine impaired the parameters of psychomotor function measured. Blood concentrations of prilocaine were significantly (P less than 0.001) lower than those of mepivacaine during the whole observation period. It was concluded that in comparison to lidocaine, bupivacaine, or etidocaine, which have been tested previously and found to impair psychomotor performance, mepivacaine and, especially, prilocaine are the anaesthetic agents to be preferred when effects on central nervous system should be avoided, e.g. in outpatient practice.

Adult↗