Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Liquid Phase Microextraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Determination of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid in human serum by solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography.

A solid phase microextraction (SPME)-HPLC-UV method for the determination of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid (MPA) in human serum samples was developed for the first time. The procedure, that employed a carbowax/templated resin (Carbowax/TPR-100) as fiber coating, required a very simple sample pretreatment, an isocratic elution, and provides an highly selective extraction. The linear range was 0.2-100 microg x ml(-1). Recovery was practically unchanged (63+/- 4%) passing from 0.2 to 100 microg x ml(-1) level. Within-day and between-days coefficient of variation ranged from 5.9 to 6.5% and from 8.8 to 9.2%, respectively. A detection limit of 0.05 microg x ml(-1) was estimated in spiked serum. The method was successfully applied to the determination of MPA in serum of a patient under mycophenolate mophetil ester (MMF) therapy, as demonstrated by the relevant concentration-time profiles.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Fully automated in-tube solid-phase microextraction for liquid samples coupled to gas chromatography.

An online device is described in which analytes are extracted from a liquid sample by means of in-tube solid-phase microextraction (in-tube SPME), pulse released by rapid heating, and transferred to a gas chromatograph in a fully automated way. Switching of the sample and gas flows as well as the heating of the extraction tube and the valves is controlled by a remote computer system. Results obtained for river water and for aqueous standard solutions of phenanthrene are presented and are compared to the performance of standard SPME.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Determination of phenothiazines in human body fluids by solid-phase microextraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Eleven phenothiazine derivatives with heavy side-chains were found to be extractable from human whole blood and urine samples by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a polyacrylate-coated fiber. The fiber was then injected into the desorption chamber of an SPME-liquid chromatography (LC) interface for LC/tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with positive ion electrospray (ES) ionization. All compounds formed base peaks due to [M + 1](+) ions by LC/ES-MS/MS. By use of LC/ES-MS/MS, the product ions produced from each [M + 1](+) ion showed base peaks due to side-chain liberation. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) and selected ion monitoring (SIM) were compared for the detection of the 11 phenothiazine derivatives from human whole blood and urine. SRM showed much higher sensitivity than SIM for both types of sample. Therefore, a detailed procedure for the detection of drugs by SRM with SPME-LC/MS/MS was established and carefully validated. The extraction efficiencies of the 11 phenothiazine derivatives spiked into whole blood and urine were 0. 0002-0.12 and 2.6-39.8%, respectively. The regression equations for the 11 phenothiazine derivatives showed excellent linearity with detection limits of 0.2-200 ng ml(-1) for whole blood and 4-22 pg ml(-1) for urine. The intra- and inter-day precisions for whole blood and urine samples were not greater than 15.1%. The data obtained after oral administration of perazine or flupentixol to a male subject are presented.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

On-fibre solid-phase microextraction coupled to conventional liquid chromatography versus in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to capillary liquid chromatography for the screening analysis of triazines in water samples.

This paper compares the advantages and disadvantages of two different configurations for the extraction of triazines from water samples: (1) on-fibre solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to conventional liquid chromatography (LC); and (2) in-tube SPME coupled to capillary LC. In-tube SPME has been effected either with a packed column or with an open capillary column. A critical evaluation of the main parameters affecting the performance of each method has been carried out in order to select the most suitable approach according to the requirements of the analysis. In the on-fibre SPME configuration the fibre coating was polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-divinylbenzene (DVB). The limits of detection (LODs) obtained with this approach under the optimized extraction and desorption conditions were between 25 and 125 microg/L. The in-tube SPME approach with a C18 packed column (35 mm x 0.5 mm I.D., 5 microm particle size) connected to a switching micro-valve provided the best sensitivity; under such configuration the LODs were between 0.025 and 0.5 microg/L. The in-tube SPME approach with an open capillary column coated with PDMS (30 cm x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 microm of thickness coating) connected to the injection valve provided LODs between 0.1 and 0.5 microg/L. In all configurations UV detection at 230 nm was used. Atrazine, simazine, propazine, ametryn, prometryn and terbutryn were selected as model compounds.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2002

Aroma analysis of fresh and preserved onions and leek by dual solid-phase microextraction-liquid extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

The lachrymatory factor (thiopropanal-S-oxide) was directly analysed on fresh onion (Allium cepa) juice by solid-phase microextraction (polyacrylate fibre) using a fast routine GC-MS method on a 10 m x 0.32 mm I.D. (4 microm thick polydimethylsiloxane film) column with splitless mode injection. The identification and quantification of thiosulphinates and zwiebelanes were obtained on the same juice extracted by diethyl ether after 80 min maceration using the same GC-MS method. Selected ion recording enhanced the differentiation possibilities and the detection limits. This dual method was used to evaluate flavour differences between onion and shallot varieties as it provides accurate profiles of all initially formed compounds. Moreover, this method allowed us to compare qualitatively and quantitatively transformed products: frozen, freeze-dried powders and sterilised products. Excepting the lachrymatory factor, frozen onion compounds were similar compared to those of fresh onion sample. Conversely, the other transformed samples have lost most of the initially formed compounds and produced mainly di- and trisulphides corresponding to the degradation of thiosulphinates and zwiebelanes. These dramatic changes can explain the very different flavours of these manufactured products compared to fresh material.

Food Preservation↗
PubMed2004

Determination of explosives in environmental water samples by solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography.

When explosives are present in natural aqueous media, their concentration is usually limited to trace levels. A preconcentration step able to remove matrix interferences and to enhance sensitivity is therefore necessary. In the present study, we evaluated solid-phase microextraction (SPME) technique for the recovery of nine explosives from aqueous samples using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). Several parameters, including adsorption and desorption time, coating type, rate of stirring, salt addition, and pH, were optimized to obtain reproducible data with good accuracy. Carbowax coating was the only adsorbent found capable of adsorbing all explosives including nitramines. Method detection limits (MDL) were found to range from 1 to 10 microg/L, depending on the analyte. SPME/HPLC-UV coupling was then applied to the analysis of natural ocean and groundwater samples and compared to conventional solid-phase extraction (SPE/HPLC-UV). Excellent agreement was observed between both techniques, but with an analysis time around five times shorter, SPME/HPLC-UV was considered to be applicable for quantitative analysis of explosives.

Adsorption↗
PubMed2004

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water by solid-phase microextraction and liquid chromatography.

This study describes the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with fluorescence detection (FLD). Because individual PAHs are generally present in water only at trace levels, a sensitive and accurate determination technique is essential. The separation and detection of five PAHs were run completely within 25 min by the HPLC/FLD system with an analytical C18 column, a fluorescence detection, and acetonitrile-water gradient elution. Calibration graphs were linear with very good correlation coefficients (r > 0.9998), and the detection limits were in the range of 2-6 ng/l for five PAHs. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) was performed for sample pretreatment prior to HPLC-FLD determination, and the governing parameters were investigated. Compared to conventional methods, SPME has high recovery, saves considerable time, and reduces solvents waste. The extraction efficiencies of five PAHs were above 88% and the extraction times were 35 min in one pretreatment procedure. One particular discovery is that 1.5 M sodium monochloroactate (ClCH2COONa) can improve the extraction yield of PAH compounds more than other inorganic salts. The SPME-HPLC-FLD technique provides a relatively simple, convenient, practical procedure, which was here successfully applied to determine five PAHs in water from authentic water samples.

Chemistry Techniques, Analytical↗
PubMed2006

A simple supported liquid hollow fiber membrane microextraction for sample preparation of trihalomethanes in water samples.

A simple and efficient liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) technique using a supported liquid hollow fiber membrane, in conjunction with gas chromatography-electron capture detector has been developed for extraction and determination of trihalomethanes (THMs) in water samples. THMs were extracted from water samples through an organic extracting solvent impregnated in the pores and filled inside the porous hollow fiber membrane. Our simple conditions were conducted at 35 degrees C with no stirring and no salt addition in order to minimize sample preparation steps. Parameters such as types of hollow fiber membranes, extracting solvents and extraction time were studied and optimized. The method exhibited enrichment factors ranged from 28- to 62-fold within 30 min extraction time. The linearity of the method ranged from 0.2 to 100 microg l(-1). The limits of detection were in the low microg l(-1) level, ranging between 0.01 and 0.2 microg l(-1). The recoveries of spiked THMs at 5 microg l(-1) in water were between 98 and 105% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) less than 4%. Furthermore, the method was applied for determination of THMs in drinking water and tap water samples was reported.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2006

Determination of Ochratoxin A in wine at sub ng/mL levels by solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME), using a polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber, interfaced with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (LC-FD) has been applied to the determination of Ochratoxin A (OTA) in wine samples. Compared to the most widely adopted extraction/clean-up procedure based on immunoaffinity columns (IAC), the solventless extraction is simpler and cost-effective, requiring the simple immersion of the fiber in diluted wine samples. Furthermore, a fast LC separation is achieved under isocratic conditions. The linear range investigated in wine was 0.25-8 ng/mL; at fortification levels of 0.5 and 2 ng/mL, within-day intra-laboratory precision (repeatability) values, expressed as RSD%, were 5.9 and 5.1, respectively, whereas between days (n = 4) precision was 8.5 and 7.1%, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) at a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 3 was 0.07 ng/mL; the limit of quantification (LOQ) calculated at S/N = 10 was 0.22 ng/mL, well below the European regulatory level of 2 ng/mL. The potential of the method has been demonstrated by the analysis of a number of different wine samples.

Chemical Fractionation↗
PubMed2001

[Advances in solid phase microextraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography].

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is a solvent-free technique with high extraction efficiency and easy to perform automatically. It can be coupled with high performance liquid chromatography to perform efficient analysis of compounds with high polarity. The advances in solid phase microextraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography, including its theory, interfaces, coating materials and applications, are reviewed with 36 references.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2006

Strategies for the microextraction of polar organic contaminants in water samples.

In this paper the most recent developments in the microextraction of polar analytes from aqueous environmental samples are critically reviewed. The particularities of different microextraction approaches, mainly solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir-bar-sorptive extraction (SBSE), and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), and their suitability for use in combination with chromatographic or electrically driven separation techniques for determination of polar species are discussed. The compatibility of microextraction techniques, especially SPME, with different derivatisation strategies enabling GC determination of polar analytes and improving their extractability is revised. In addition to the use of derivatisation reactions, the possibility of enhancing the yield of solid-phase microextraction methods for polar analytes by using new coatings and/or larger amounts of sorbent is also considered. Finally, attention is also focussed on describing the versatility of LPME in its different possible formats and its ability to improve selectivity in the extraction of polar analytes with acid-base properties by using separation membranes and buffer solutions, instead of organic solvents, as the acceptor solution.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Analytical microextraction: current status and future trends.

Analytical microextractions, defined as nonexhaustive sample preparation with a very small volume of extracting phase (microliter range or smaller) relative to the sample volume, represent an important development in the field of analytical chemistry. Analytes are extracted by a small volume of a solid or semi-solid polymeric material, as in solid-phase microextraction (SPME), or alternatively by a small volume of a liquid, as in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). This paper gives an overview of the SPME and LPME techniques and discusses future trends. This includes a discussion of the different extraction formats available, commercial equipment, method transfer from traditional sample preparation methods to microextraction, and performance as well as robustness for the latter type of systems. In addition, the paper contains a unified approach to the understanding of extraction thermodynamics and kinetics applicable to both SPME and LPME.

Chemical Fractionation↗
PubMed2006

[Extraction and determination of short-chain fatty acids in biological samples].

Short-chain fatty acids are organic acids with 1 - 6 carbon atoms. Their physiological functions and clinical applications have attracted considerable attention. Their high polarity, low ultraviolet (UV) absorbance, low contents in biological samples, high volatility, good water-solubility and easy adsorption on metal and glass surfaces result in some difficulties in their separation and determination. This review focuses on the methods for extraction of short-chain fatty acids in biological samples such as feces, urine, blood and culture solutions by distillation, high speed centrifugation, liquid-solid extraction, solid phase microextration, supercritical fluid extraction and liquid phase microextraction and determination by gas chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Sixty-three references are cited.

Adsorption↗
PubMed2006

Developments in single-drop microextraction.

Single-drop microextraction (SDME) has become a very popular liquid-phase microextraction technique because it is inexpensive, easy to operate and nearly solvent-free. Essentially, SDME combines extraction (and conceivably, cleanup) and concentration in a minimum number of steps, and thereafter, direct extract introduction into an analytical system. In this review, in order to encourage further development of SDME, we focus on its recent developments in its various guises. Its applications when used in combination with different analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, are summarized. SDME does have some limitations, and these are also discussed as well. Finally, an outlook on the future of the technique is given.

Analytic Sample Preparation Methods↗
PubMed2004

Monitoring of drugs and metabolites in whole blood by restricted-access solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Robust biocompatible solid-phase microextraction (SPME) devices were prepared using various alkyldiol-silica (ADS) restricted-access materials (RAM) as the SPME coating. The ADS-SPME approach was able to simultaneously fractionate the protein component from a biological sample, while directly extracting diazepam and the major metabolites N-desmethyldiazepam, oxazepam and temazepam, and overcame the present disadvantages of direct sampling in biological matrices by SPME. The devices were interfaced with an LC-MS system and an isocratic mobile phase was used to desorb, separate, and quantify the analytes. The calculated diazepam, nordiazepam, temazepam, and oxazepam detection limits were 20, 20, 30, and 35 ng/ml in heparinized blood, respectively. The method was confirmed to be linear over the range of 50-1000 ng/ml with an average linear coefficient (R2) value of 0.996. The injection repeatability and intra-assay precision of the method were evaluated over ten injections at concentrations of 50, 200, and 500 ng/ml, resulting in a R.S.D. of ca. 10%. The robustness of the ADS-SPME device was evaluated for future use in in vivo studies, providing many direct extractions and subsequent determination of benzodiazepines in blood. For the extraction of the peptides angiotensin I, II, and III from blood, a novel restricted access material with cation exchange properties was evaluated. The ion-exchange diol silica improved the extraction efficiency of peptides relative to the conventional ADS material with reversed phase extraction centers.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2001

Determination of microcystins in cyanobacterial blooms by solid-phase microextraction-high-performance liquid chromatography.

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was applied to study microcystin (MC) profiles in a natural Microcystis sp. bloom in a freshwater pond in Guangzhou, China. Three dominant MC variants, namely MC-LR, MC-YR, and MC-RR, were quantified. Simultaneous study of their total, extracellular, and intracellular profiles was made possible using SPME coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography. The total and intracellular concentrations of MC-LR in the bloom were 8.67 x 10(-2) microg/ ml and 1.93 mg/g, respectively. The corresponding concentrations of MC-YR were 1.20 x 10(-3) microg/ml and 0.06 mg/g, respectively, and those of MC-RR were 5.57 x 10(-2) microg/ml and 1.49 mg/g, respectively. Only MC-LR was detectable in the extracellular phase (1.49 x 10(-2) microg/ml) of the bloom, and its concentration was 14% of the intracellular content. Mass balance consideration revealed that only 71.1% of total MC-LR, 36.0% of total MC-YR, and 67.4% of total MC-RR within the cyanobacterial cells were released into the aqueous phase immediately after cell lysis.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2003

Determination of organic micropollutants in rainwater using hollow fiber membrane/liquid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A simple and rapid liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) method using a hollow fiber membrane (HFM) in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is presented for the quantitative determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and 12 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in rainwater samples. The LPME conditions were optimized for achieving high enrichment of the analytes from aqueous samples, in terms of hollow fiber exposure time, stirring rate, sample pH, and composition. Enrichment factors of more than 100 could be achieved within 35 min of extraction with relative standard deviations (R.S.D.s) 1.3-13.6% for PAHs and 1.7-13.8% for OCPs, respectively, over a wide range of analyte concentrations. Detection limits ranged from 0.002 to 0.047 microg l(-1) for PAHs, and from 0.013 to 0.059 microg l(-1) for OCPs, respectively. The newly developed LPME-GC-MS method has been validated for the analysis of PAHs and OCPs in rainwater samples. Extraction recoveries from spiked synthetic rainwater samples varied from 73 to 115% for PAHs and from 75 to 113% for OCPs, respectively. Real rainwater samples were analyzed using the optimized method. The concentrations of PAHs and OCPs in real rainwater samples were between 0.005-0.162, and 0.063 microg l(-1), respectively.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗
PubMed2006

Ochratoxin a determination in beer by solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection: a fast and sensitive method for assessment of noncompliance to legal limits.

A solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (SPME-LC-FD) method for the determination of ochratoxin A (OTA) in commercial beer samples was developed for the first time using a 60 microm thick poly(dimethylsiloxane)/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber. The procedure required a very simple sample pretreatment, an isocratic elution, and provides a selective extraction. All of the factors influencing fiber adsorption (extraction time, temperature, pH, and salt addition) and desorption of the analyte (desorption and injection time and desorption solvent mixture composition) have been investigated. The linear range investigated in beer was 0.03-2 ng/mL; within-day and between-days relative standard deviation in beer were 4.3 and 5.9%, respectively. The limit of quantification in spiked beer was 53 pg mL(-)(1), well below all European regulatory levels.

Beer↗