Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Infliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Guidelines for treatment with infliximab for Crohn's disease.

Infliximab is an accepted induction and maintenance treatment for patients with Crohn's disease. The effectiveness of infliximab has been demonstrated for both active luminal disease and for enterocutaneous fistulisation. In addition, infliximab can be administered for extraintestinal symptoms of Crohn's disease, such as pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis and arthropathy. Maintenance treatment with infliximab is effective and is regarded as safe as long as the necessary safety measures are heeded. Infusion reactions occur in 3 to 17% of the patients and are associated with the formation of antibodies to infliximab. A reduction in infusion reactions is possible by the concurrent administration of steroids and the use of immunosuppressants (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate). Furthermore, immunosuppressants increase the duration of the response to infliximab. For these reasons, the concomitant use of immunosuppressants with infliximab is recommended. Infections and most specifically tuberculosis need to be ruled out before infliximab is administered. Up to now, there are no indications for a connection between an increased risk for malignancies and treatment with infliximab.

Algorithms↗

Improving outcomes in tumour necrosis factor a treatment: comparison of the efficacy of the tumour necrosis factor a blocking agents etanercept and infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between infliximab and etanercept, in terms of clinical efficacy and rapidity of action. METHODS: We selected 32 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an incomplete response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and randomly assigned them to etanercept or infliximab. We evaluated the efficacy after 14, 22, 54 weeks of treatment, using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70 criteria, and the improvement of quality of life using the Health Assessment Question-naire (HAQ). RESULTS: After 14 weeks, the 54.4% of patients was considered ACR-responders in the etanercept group, whereas, in the infliximab group, the percentage of responders was 74.4%: infliximab gave better results for the tender joint count and for physician's global assessment. After 22 weeks, no significant difference was present. After 54 weeks, etanercept resulted more effective than infliximab for tender joint count (TJC) value, for visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain score, for global disease assessment value, with 74.4% of patients considered ACR-responders in the group treated with etanercept and 60% in the group treated with infliximab. As regards HAQ, patients in the infliximab group presented higher scores at week 14, but in weeks 22 and 54, patients in the etanercept group showed better results. Therefore, both infliximab and etanercept are efficacious in RA, but infliximab is more efficacious than etanercept in week 14. Vice versa, in week 54 etanercept is the most efficacious drug. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians have 2 weapons in their armamentarium, with the same target but distinct clinical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Adult↗

Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of active and progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with an inadequate response to standard treatment (including DMARD therapy). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. The literature search covered a range of 13 medical databases and submissions were provided by the manufacturers of etanercept and infliximab. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of etanercept or infliximab that reported outcomes of disease activity in PsA were reviewed. RESULTS: There were two good quality double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs each for etanercept and infliximab. The results demonstrated that after initial treatment (12 weeks for etanercept and 14 or 16 weeks for infliximab) both drugs had statistically significant beneficial effects compared with placebo on ACR 20, 50 and 70, PsARC and HAQ scores. Efficacy was not dependent upon concomitant methotrexate. Results at 24 weeks indicated that the response to treatment is maintained. Effects on psoriasis were beneficial, particularly with infliximab. Uncontrolled radiographic assessment data at one year indicated a beneficial effect of both etanercept and infliximab on the progression of joint disease. CONCLUSION: Our review indicates that both etanercept and infliximab are efficacious in the treatment of PsA with beneficial effects on both joint and psoriasis symptoms and on functional status. There are limited data indicating that etanercept and infliximab can delay joint disease progression. Further long-term data are required to confirm and consolidate the evidence base for both drugs.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT).

OBJECTIVE: The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C-reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24. RESULTS: Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24-week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF-36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24-week study period.

Adult↗

A prospective trial of infliximab therapy for refractory uveitis: preliminary safety and efficacy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of numerous autoimmune disorders. We conducted a prospective, open-label phase 2 clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of infliximab in treating refractory autoimmune uveitis. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 23 patients from the uveitis clinic of the Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Ore, into this trial. All patients meeting eligibility criteria received 3 infliximab infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Clinical success was ascertained at week 10. Patients meeting initial criteria for success received an infusion at week 14 and every 8 weeks thereafter, with dose escalation permitted for breakthrough inflammation, and underwent outcome measurements at week 50. RESULTS: All patients underwent outcome assessment at week 10. Eighteen (78%) of these subjects met criteria for clinical success at this time. Success was judged by the composite clinical end point of visual acuity, control of intraocular inflammation, ability to taper concomitant medication therapy, and improvement in inflammatory signs on fluorescein angiography and/or ocular coherence tomography. Successful grading required improvement in at least 1 of 4 subcomponents and worsening in none. Seven of 14 patients enrolled for 1 year continued infliximab therapy and maintained their successful grading. Five did not complete 1 year of treatment because of significant adverse events, and 2 terminated treatment early for reasons unrelated to the study. Serious adverse events that were potentially related to infliximab included pulmonary embolus, congestive heart failure, lupus-like reaction in 2, and vitreous hemorrhage in 2 patients. Antinuclear antibodies developed in 15 of 20 enrolled patients receiving 3 or more infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab was an effective short-term immunosuppressive agent in most of the patients, with 18 of 23 meeting criteria for clinical success at week 10. Infliximab was effective in the long term in all patients able to complete 50 weeks of therapy. Although some patients achieved clear benefit, the rate of serious toxic effects was unexpectedly high. Further long-term studies are warranted to determine the safety and efficacy of infliximab in treating intraocular inflammation.

Adolescent↗

Magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, before and after successful therapy with infliximab: evaluation of a new scoring system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for the assessment of spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of infliximab, and to examine whether infliximab is also effective for the reduction of MRI-proven spinal inflammation. METHODS: Twenty patients with AS (9 women and 11 men, mean age 40.9 years) were examined at baseline and after 3 months. Nine patients had received infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg body weight) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and 11 patients had received placebo. Three MRI sequences and 2 scoring systems were used. Chronic lesions were evaluated by T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences and were assigned a chronicity score. Active lesions were evaluated either by repetition of T1-weighted TSE sequences after infusion of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) or by short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, and were assigned an activity score. The 40 images were evaluated twice by 2 readers who were blinded to the names of the patients and the dates of the examinations, and were analyzed in relation to the clinical results. RESULTS: Active spinal lesions were detected in 15 of 20 patients (75%); the frequency as determined by STIR was equal in the 2 groups. At baseline, the total MRI scores determined using Gd-DTPA, STIR, and T1 were 112.5, 156, and 253.5, respectively. The interrater variance and intrarater variance were, respectively, 6.4 and 7.7 for the active lesion score as determined by Gd-DTPA, 15.7 and 5.3 for the active lesion score as determined by STIR sequence, and 167.3 and 75.5 for the chronic lesion score as determined by T1 sequence. Based on the means of the scores assigned by the 2 readers, the active lesion score as determined by Gd-DTPA improved by 40% in the infliximab group compared with 6% in the placebo group, the active lesion score as determined by STIR improved by 60% in the infliximab group but deteriorated by 21% in the placebo group, and the chronic lesion score as determined by T1 improved by 7% in the infliximab group but worsened by 35% in the placebo group. Five patients in the infliximab group and 2 in the placebo group were clinical responders. The acute MRI changes correlated with clinical improvement as assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. CONCLUSION: This novel MRI scoring system performed well in assessing acute inflammation by using STIR and post-Gd-DTPA sequences. In correlation with clinical improvement in patients with active AS who were treated with infliximab, significant regression of spinal inflammation was shown by using the MRI activity scores.

Adult↗

Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: an open, observational, extension study of a three-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, was shown to be efficacious in patients with active disease during a 3-month treatment period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab treatment of AS for a 1-year period. METHODS: This study was an open, observational, extension study of a 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. All patients who had tolerated infliximab (infliximab/infliximab group) or placebo (placebo/infliximab 12-week crossover group) therapy for 3 months entered the open extension trial (n = 65). Infliximab was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks after the induction phase (weeks 0, 2, and 6). The primary end point was a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). RESULTS: At week 54, a total of 54 of the 69 patients (78%) continued to take infliximab. The intent-to-treat primary efficacy analysis at week 54 showed that 47% of patients in the infliximab/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 31-63) and 51% of the patients in the placebo/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 36-67) achieved 50% improvement in BASDAI scores. In the analysis of those who completed the study, the mean BASDAI scores improved between weeks 0 and 54 in both treatment groups: from 6.6 to 2.4 in the infliximab/infliximab group and from 6.3 to 2.6 in the placebo/infliximab group. The dosage of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs was reduced in approximately 70% of the patients. There were significant improvements in measures of functioning, metrologic parameters, and quality of life. Between weeks 12 and 54, a total of 4 patients had serious adverse events that were possibly related to infliximab and resulted in their discontinuing the study. CONCLUSION: Infliximab therapy in AS patients resulted in a rapid and significant improvement in BASDAI scores (>50% improvement) and a durable response for 1 year. The safety profile of infliximab in AS was comparable to that observed in the postmarketing experience for the approved indications.

Acute-Phase Proteins↗

Tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the effect of infliximab therapy.

OBJECTIVE: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the 1999 and 2000 incidence rates for tuberculosis (TB) in the US population were 6.4 and 5.8, respectively, per 100,000 persons. Recently, reports of TB following infliximab administration have raised questions regarding the rate of TB in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) generally and in those treated with infliximab in clinical practice. We undertook this study to determine the baseline rate of TB in RA prior to the introduction of infliximab and to determine the rate of TB among those currently receiving infliximab. METHODS: We surveyed patients with questionnaires, followed by detailed validation from medical records and physician reports. In study 1, we evaluated 10,782 RA patients in 1998-1999 prior to the widespread use of infliximab. In study 2, we evaluated 6,460 infliximab-treated patients in 2000-2002. RESULTS: In study 1, the lifetime rate of TB was 696 per 100,000 patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 547-872). Of these cases, 76.8% occurred prior to the onset of RA. During the period of prospective followup, 1 case of TB developed during 16,173 patient-years of followup, yielding a rate of 6.2 cases (95% CI 1.6-34.4) per 100,000 patients. In study 2, the TB incidence rate among infliximab-treated patients was 52.5 cases (95% CI 14.3-134.4) per 100,000 patient-years of exposure. Three of the 4 cases occurred in patients with a history of TB exposure, and no cases occurred in persons with recent TB skin tests or prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The rate of TB is not increased in RA patients generally. Among infliximab-treated patients, the rate is 52.5 cases (95% CI 14.3-134.4) per 100,000 patient-years of exposure. A thorough medical history regarding TB, as well as tuberculin testing and radiographic examination (if indicated), should be an essential component of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of infliximab plus methotrexate (MTX) over a 2-year period in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously experienced an incomplete response to MTX. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive MTX plus placebo or infliximab at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg plus MTX for 54 weeks, with an additional year of followup. The protocol was later amended to allow for continued treatment during the second year. Of 259 patients who entered the second year of treatment, 216 continued to receive infliximab plus MTX for 102 weeks. Ninety-four of these 259 patients experienced a gap in therapy of >8 weeks before continuing therapy. Infusions were administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by treatment every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (alternating with placebo infusions in the interim 4-week visits) at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg for a total of 102 weeks (including the gap in therapy). For safety and efficacy assessments, data on the patients who were randomized to receive treatment, irrespective of whether treatment was administered for 102 weeks, were evaluated using all actual observations available. The efficacy measures included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (physical function), Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) (health-related quality of life), total radiographic scores (structural damage), and the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) (signs and symptoms). RESULTS: The infliximab plus MTX regimens resulted in significantly greater improvement in HAQ scores (P < or = 0.006) and SF-36 physical component summary scores (P < or = 0.011) compared with the MTX-only group. There also was stability in the SF-36 mental component summary score among patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimens. Median changes from baseline to week 102 in the total radiographic score were 4.25 for patients who received the MTX-only regimen and 0.50 for patients who received the infliximab plus MTX regimen. The proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response at week 102 varied from 40% to 48% for the infliximab plus MTX groups compared with 16% for the MTX-only group. CONCLUSION: Throughout 102 weeks of therapy, infliximab plus MTX provided significant, clinically relevant improvement in physical function and quality of life, accompanied by inhibition of progressive joint damage and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA among patients who previously had an incomplete response to MTX alone.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between inflammation and joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have not responded clinically to treatment. METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 54 in clinical variables and measures of radiographic progression were compared between patients who received infliximab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks) plus methotrexate (MTX) and those who received MTX plus placebo in the Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in RA with Concomitant Therapy trial. RESULTS: At week 54, patients who did not show 20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20 nonresponders) while receiving infliximab plus MTX exhibited mild but statistically significant improvement in clinical variables, including the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) (P < 0.001), tender joint count (P = 0.014), swollen joint count (P < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (P < 0.001). Whereas the clinical and CRP changes among ACR20 nonresponders to infliximab plus MTX were small and much lower than among ACR20 responders to this treatment, radiographic progression among ACR20 nonresponders to infliximab plus MTX was significantly inhibited (P < 0.001) compared with ACR20 nonresponders to MTX plus placebo. Radiographic progression was much greater in patients receiving MTX plus placebo than in patients receiving infliximab plus MTX, irrespective of ACR response status (mean change in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score 6.0 in ACR20 responders and 7.2 in ACR20 nonresponders in the MTX plus placebo-treated group, versus 0.1 in ACR20 responders and 1.2 in ACR20 nonresponders in the infliximab plus MTX-treated group). Furthermore, among patients who were ACR20 nonresponders through week 54, patients who were DAS nonresponders at weeks 30 and 54, and patients without any improvement in individual clinical variables, those receiving infliximab plus MTX still demonstrated inhibition of structural damage that was statistically significant compared with inhibition in patients who received MTX plus placebo (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Even in patients without clinical improvement, treatment with infliximab plus MTX provided significant benefit with regard to the destructive process, suggesting that in such patients these 2 measures of disease are dissociated.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Ultrasonographic and radiographic results from a two-year controlled trial of immediate or one-year-delayed addition of infliximab to ongoing methotrexate therapy in patients with erosive early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of immediate and delayed introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy on inflammation and structural damage in methotrexate (MTX)-treated patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty-four patients with erosive early RA (duration < 3 years) who were receiving MTX were randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks through week 46. Beginning at week 54 and thereafter, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg. Metacarpophalangeal joints were scanned using high-frequency ultrasonography and power Doppler imaging. Radiographs were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring system. RESULTS: From baseline to week 54, total synovial thickness was significantly improved in the infliximab + MTX group compared with the placebo + MTX group (median reduction 95.8% versus 37.5%; P = 0.005), as was the total color Doppler area (CDA; vascularity assessment) (median reduction 100% and 47.1%, respectively; P = 0.025). From week 0 to week 110, no significant between-group difference was observed in the change from baseline for total synovial thickening or the total CDA. At week 54, greater progression in the Sharp/van der Heijde score was apparent in patients receiving placebo + MTX compared with those receiving infliximab + MTX. Although radiographic progression in the placebo + MTX group was greatly reduced in the second year (after initiation of infliximab therapy), marked differences were observed between the infliximab + MTX group (median change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score 4.0) and the placebo + MTX group (median change 14.5) from baseline to week 110 (P = 0.076). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the efficacy of 2 years of combination therapy with infliximab + MTX for inhibiting cumulative structural damage was superior to that of 1 year of treatment with MTX alone followed by the addition of infliximab.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Linear growth improves during infliximab therapy in children with chronically active severe Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of infliximab as maintenance therapy in patients with otherwise chronically active Crohn's disease (CD) is well established. Data concerning the linear growth response are sparse and can only be accrued in children. METHODS: From September 2000 to February 2004, 32 children and adolescents (63% males; mean age 13.4 years, range 4.7-17.3) with chronically active CD despite immunomodulatory and prior corticosteroid therapy commenced infliximab therapy. Growth parameters standardized for age, gender, and pubertal development prior to and following infliximab therapy were compared. RESULTS: In all, 28 of 32 patients tolerated and responded to the induction regimen and 27 responders continued to receive infliximab via regularly scheduled infusions (n = 22) or episodically (n = 5) for a median of 26 months. Mean standard deviation score (SDS) for height at time of initiation of infliximab therapy was -1.15 +/- 1.2 and had declined despite the use of other therapies from -0.44 +/- 1.1 at initial diagnosis. Increases in height velocity and stature during infliximab therapy were limited by pubertal stage: Tanner I-III: DeltaSDS for height velocity +3.94, for height +0.50, P < 0.001; Tanner IV, V: DeltaSDS for height velocity +0.22, for height 0.02, P = NS. CONCLUSIONS: Height velocity improves and height centile increases during infliximab therapy provided patients are treated prior to or in early puberty. These data support the use of infliximab in young patients with otherwise refractory disease, and suggest that ultimate height in this subset of children with severe CD may be less compromised than with previous therapies.

Adolescent↗

Efficacy and safety of repeated infliximab infusions for Crohn's disease: 1-year clinical experience.

Data from clinical trials suggest the efficacy of the chimeric tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab in improving clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) and fistulizing CD. To determine whether the efficacy and safety record of infliximab reported in clinical trials would be reflected in clinical use, clinical experience with infliximab was assessed in patients with CD at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. All patients with CD at this institution receiving infliximab in the first year of its release were prospectively followed up for 1 year. Disease activity was scored at the time of the initial infusion and at 1, 3, 7, and 12 weeks after infusion. Results were analyzed separately for patients with luminal or fistulous CD. Clinical response, remission, corticosteroid tapering, and adverse event data were collected. A total of 129 patients with luminal (n = 81) or fistulous (n = 48) disease received a mean of 2.38 and 3.23 infusions of infliximab per patient, respectively. After the initial infusion course, clinical response and remission rates at 3 weeks were 65% and 31% for patients with luminal disease and 78% and 24% for patients with fistulous disease, respectively. Clinical response and remission after the first infusion occurred at a median of 8 days and 9 days, respectively. In those patients who subsequently relapsed, relapses occurred after a mean of 8.5 weeks and 12.2 weeks in patients with luminal and fistulizing disease, respectively. Corticosteroid tapering was possible in > 90% of patients (luminal disease) after the initial infusion and complete withdrawal in 54% after the second infusion, with a sustained median steroid dose of 0 mg from the 4-month time-point onward. Infusion reactions or adverse events occurred in 5-13% of patients during or immediately after the initial infusion of infliximab; most were mild and easily managed and did not increase in incidence with subsequent infusions. Clinical experience with infliximab closely mirrors the findings of controlled clinical trials. Repeated administration of infliximab was efficacious and relatively well tolerated in patients with CD and demonstrated corticosteroid-sparing benefits.

Adult↗

Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis before and after infliximab treatment.

To evaluate antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) together with rheumatoid factor (RF), antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and C-reactive protein (CRP), in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), before and after infliximab treatment. Twenty-seven patients (five men and 22 women, mean age of 51.9 years, mean duration of disease 12.6 years) affected by RA, refractory to conventional DMARDs, were treated with infliximab, at the conventional dosage. Before starting infliximab and after 22 weeks, on the occasion of the fifth infusion, anti-CCP antibodies were tested by ELISA method. At the same time IgM RF, ANA and CRP level were measured. Before infliximab therapy, anti-CCP antibodies resulted positive in 23 patients (85.1%); the serum level did not change after infliximab treatment; only one case negative at baseline became slightly positive after treatment. Before and after therapy RF resulted positive in 22 cases (81.4%) and 21 cases (77.7%) respectively; comparing values at baseline with those after 22 weeks of treatment with infliximab, RF levels significantly decreased, as well as CRP values. In contrast to both anti-CCP antibodies, which remained stable, and to RF, which fell after infliximab, ANA were positive > or = 1: 160 in four cases at baseline and in 12 after treatment. The titre of anti-CCP antibodies did not significantly change after anti-TNFalpha blocker administration; instead the positivity of RF significantly decreased. As opposed to antinuclear and anti-dsDNA antibodies, which may appear or increase in titre during infliximab treatment, the typical autoantibodies detectable in RA show a different trend; in fact, anti-CCP antibodies remained stable and RF decreased.

Adult↗

Treatment with anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab reduces serum IL-15 levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The aim of this study was to analyze the change of serum cytokines and pentosidine levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by infliximab treatment. Twenty-three patients with RA were studied for 30 weeks on the effects of infliximab treatment. Serum levels of IL-15, IL-16, IL-17, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were measured with ELISA methods and pentosidine levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography, both at baseline and at 14 and 30 weeks after the initial treatment with infliximab. In addition, the patients also underwent physical and routine blood examinations. The higher levels of serum IL-15 in RA patients before treatment with infliximab significantly decreased at 14 and 30 weeks after the initial treatment with infliximab, but serum IL-16, IL-17, GM-CSF, and pentosidine levels did not decrease. The serum IL-17 and GM-CSF levels remained to be a limited detectable level at the pre- and posttreatment with infliximab. Infliximab treatment significantly lowered the serum levels of IL-15 in patients with RA. IL-15 is one of the crucial cytokines affected by infliximab.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Combined seton placement, infliximab infusion, and maintenance immunosuppressives improve healing rate in fistulizing anorectal Crohn's disease: a single center experience.

PURPOSE: Infliximab (anti-TNF alpha) has been used for the treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease with variable efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of infliximab combined with selective seton drainage in the healing of fistulizing anorectal Crohn's disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease treated with infliximab between March 2000 and February 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (12 male; mean age, 31 years) received a mean of 3 (range, 1-5) doses of infliximab 5 mg/kg. Twenty-one patients had perianal fistulas; eight had rectovaginal fistulas, four with combined rectovaginal/perianal fistula. Fourteen of 21 patients (67 percent) with perianal fistula had a complete response (mean follow-up, 9 months), 4 of the 14 relapsed (mean, 6 months), but all had a complete response to retreatment (mean, 9 months). A partial response occurred in four patients (19 percent), defined by decreased drainage (2 patients) or infliximab dependence (2 patients) requiring repeated dosing every six to eight weeks. Three patients (14 percent) had no response. Seton drainage was used before infusion in 13 perianal patients for perianal infection and 17 were treated with maintenance azathioprine or methotrexate. Of eight patients with rectovaginal fistula, complete response occurred in one, partial response in five, and no response in two. Two partial responders became infliximab dependent. A complete response was observed in one patient with isolated rectovaginal fistula, a partial response in five. No patient with a combined rectovaginal/perianal fistula had a complete response. Five rectovaginal fistula patients were taking maintenance immunosuppressive agents and two had seton drainage before infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Selective seton placement combined with infliximab infusion and maintenance immunosuppressives resulted in complete healing in 67 percent of Crohn's patients with perianal fistula and partial healing in 19 percent. Relapse was successfully treated with repeat infusion. Concomitant rectovaginal fistula was a poor prognostic indicator for successful infliximab therapy.

Adolescent↗

Clinical and biological consequences of immunization to infliximab in pediatric Crohn's disease.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of Crohn's disease, a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody blocking TNF-alpha, has proven effective as an induction and maintenance therapy for refractory Crohn's disease in adult and pediatric patients. However, infliximab therapy induces the appearance of neutralizing anti-infliximab antibodies. In the pediatric cohort, we analyzed (n=28) sensitization occurred in 35.7% patients and was associated with a loss of response to maintenance infusions. In two patients presenting high titers of anti-infliximab antibodies, severe infusion reactions were observed, possibly IgE-mediated, precluding further use of the medication. Serum concentrations of TNF-alpha and infliximab were influenced by the presence of anti-infliximab antibodies. We propose that surveillance of circulating infliximab and/or TNF-alpha concentration during maintenance therapy represents an indirect but reliable method to monitor anti-infliximab immunization.

Adolescent↗

Infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is a key mediator in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, blocking its biologic activity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to access the efficacy and safety of infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 249 patients with severe plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive intravenous infusions of either 3 or 5 mg/kg of infliximab or placebo given at weeks 0, 2, and 6. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score from baseline at week 10. At week 26, patients whose Physician Global Assessment indicated moderate or severe disease were eligible for a single intravenous infusion of their assigned treatment to assess the safety of retreatment after a 20-week, treatment-free interval. RESULTS: At week 10, 72% of patients treated with infliximab (3 mg/kg) and 88% of patients treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg) achieved a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score compared with 6% of patients treated with placebo (P <.001). Improvement was observed in both infliximab groups as early as 2 weeks. Overall, 63%, 78%, and 79% of patients in the placebo, 3-, and 5-mg/kg groups, respectively, reported one or more adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab treatment resulted in a rapid and significant improvement in the signs and symptoms of psoriasis. Infliximab was generally well tolerated.

Adult↗