Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Head Movements”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Head movement evoked by electrical stimulation in the supplementary eye field of the rhesus monkey.

Although the supplementary eye field (SEF) has been implicated in the control of head movements associated with gaze shifts, there is no direct evidence that SEF plays a role in the generation of head movements independent of gaze. If the SEF does, varying the duration of stimulation should selectively alter the head-movement kinematics during the postgaze-shift period. The duration of the stimulation was manipulated while head-unrestrained monkeys maintained stable head forward postures. The initial positions of the eyes in the orbits were systematically varied. Although combined movements of the eyes and head were produced in the majority of the trials, head movements were sometimes evoked in the absence of gaze shifts. These head-alone movements were most frequent when the initial eye position was contralateral to the stimulated side. When the stimulation produced eye and head movements, gaze onset was sometimes preceded by a relatively low-velocity phase of the head movement. Evoked head movements were primarily horizontal, unlike the gaze shifts, which typically had vertical components that varied according to the initial positions of the eyes in the orbits. The postgaze-shift head movements tended to be of low velocity and in many cases persisted until stimulation offset. In general, prolonging the stimulation resulted in improved centering of the eyes in the orbits. These findings suggest that, in addition to its previously described role in the generation of coordinated eye-head gaze shifts, the SEF is also involved in the control of head movements in the absence of a change of gaze.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1998

[Discrimination between pain-induced head movement disturbances after whiplash injuries and their simulation].

Neck pain after whiplash injury of the cervical spine often induces typical changes in head motion patterns (amplitude, velocity). These changes of kinematics may help to recognize malingerers. We investigated the hypothesis that malingerers are not able to reproduce their simulated head movement disturbances three times. The kinematics of head movements of 23 patients with neck pain after whiplash injury and of 22 healthy subjects trying to act as malingerers were compared. The healthy subjects were informed about the symptomatology of whiplash injury and were asked to simulate painful head movements. Two different kinds of head movements were registered and analyzed by Cervicomotography: (1) the slow free axial head rotation (yaw) and (2) the axial head rotation (yaw) tracking a moving visual target. Each experimental condition was presented three times, expecting the malingerers not to be able to produce as well as to reproduce the same head movement disturbances again and again. In patients, as a consequence of their distinct pain patterns, we expected less variance between the test repetitions. The statistical analysis showed significant differences of the calculated kinematic parameters between both groups and the inability of healthy subjects to simulate and to reproduce convincingly distinct pain patterns.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1983

The effect of head movements on visual and auditory dominance.

Two experiments were performed to determine the effect of active auditory exploration (head movement) on visual and auditory dominance. In each experiment subjects located a small audio speaker unimodally or bimodally. On the bimodal trials a modality discordance was created by requiring prismatic viewing. Half the subjects in each experiment remained unaware of the discordance while the other half were informed that a prism was used, and its refracting properties were demonstrated. The second experiment differed from the first by allowing observers free head movement during target localization which was transduced and recorded electromechanically. The results indicated that knowledge of modality discordance greatly reduced visual bias of audition for observers with heads immobilized, but did not affect auditory bias of vision significantly. Observers permitted head movement but not provided with knowledge of discordance demonstrated visual bias which was substantially reduced from that found in the first experiment for no-knowledge subjects. Observers who were permitted head movement and provided with knowledge of discordance demonstrated no visual bias or auditory bias. Head movements were executed systematically, when permitted, and resulted in an increase in the precision of auditory localizations and a reduction in the biasing effect of vision. In contrast, head movement did not affect the precision of visual localizations. Results are discussed in terms of current hypotheses regarding perceptual dominance.

Attention↗
PubMed1993

Effects of an early postnatal hypoxia on the development of spontaneous head movements in rabbits.

The early detection of minor brain dysfunctions resulting from perinatal hypoxia is very important since the prognosis of the affected children can be substantially improved by a prompt treatment. Therefore, this paper deals with the influence of an early postnatal hypoxia on the postnatal development of spontaneous head movements and the influence of the visual system on head movements in normal and hypoxic disturbed ontogenesis. Head movements were recorded in 12 unrestrained spontaneously behaving alert rabbits from 6 litters with the sensor coil technique. One rabbit of each litter was exposed to a single acute hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.05) for 3 h at the 1st day of life. The siblings were regarded as a control group. The most important characteristic of the postnatal development of the head movements is the forming of horizontal saccadic movements during the second postnatal week and their perfection by an increase in mean velocity up to the 20th postnatal day. The early postnatal hypoxia leads to a decrease of the mean velocity of saccadic head movements. But this is only true if the rabbits have open eyes. Blind-folding the rabbits of the control group during the recordings was followed by a decrease of the mean velocity (14th and 20th postnatal day) and the amplitude (at the 20th postnatal day) of the saccadic head movements. In contrast to the non-hypoxic rabbits, blind-folding had no perceptible influence on head movements in hypoxic rabbits until the 3rd postnatal week. Our results suggest that early postnatal hypoxia causes a

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Human eye-head gaze shifts in a distractor task. II. Reduced threshold for initiation of early head movements.

This study was motivated by the observation of early head movements (EHMs) occasionally generated before gaze shifts. Human subjects were presented with a visual or auditory target, along with an accompanying stimulus of the other modality, that either appeared at the same location as the target (enhancer condition) or at the diametrically opposite location (distractor condition). Gaze shifts generated to the target in the distractor condition sometimes were preceded by EHMs directed either to the side of the target (correct EHMs) or the side of the distractor (incorrect EHMs). During EHMs, the eyes performed compensatory eye movements to keep gaze stable. Incorrect EHMs were usually between 1 and 5 degrees in amplitude and reached peak velocities generally <50 degrees /s. These metrics increased for more eccentric distractors. The dynamics of incorrect EHMs initially followed a trajectory typical of much larger head movements. These results suggest that incorrect EHMs are head movements that initially were planned to orient to the peripheral distractor. Furthermore gaze shifts preceded by incorrect EHMs had longer reaction latencies than gaze shifts not preceded by incorrect EHMs, suggesting that the processes leading to incorrect EHMs also serve to delay gaze-shift initiation. These results demonstrate a form of distraction analogous to the incorrect gaze shifts (IGSs) described in the previous paper and suggest that a motor program encoding a gaze shift to a distractor is capable of initiating either an IGS or an incorrect EHM. A neural program not strong enough to initiate an IGS nevertheless can initiate an incorrect EHM.

Attention↗
PubMed2000

A common mechanism for the control of eye and head movements in humans.

How the human brain controls the subtle coupling between eye and head movements is still debated. The brain could either coordinate two separate (eye and head) networks or use a single system involved in gaze (eye + head) control. In a recent report, a total transfer from eye to head movements was observed in a patient with congenital ophthalmoplegia. This led the authors to hypothesize that such transfer resulted from a long-term adaptation between oculomotor and head movement systems. We report on a patient in whom a similar transfer was observed but at the acute stage of an acquired ophthalmoplegia. This case demonstrates that the transfer between head and eye movements does not necessarily require long-term adaptation and supports the hypothesis of a common unique gaze motor command in which eye and head movements would be rapidly exchangeable.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement.

Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2391-2404, 1998. The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) maintains visual image stability by generating eye movements that compensate for both angular (AVOR) and linear (LVOR) head movements, typically in concert with visual following mechanisms. The VORs are generally modulated by the "context" in which head movements are made. Three contextual influences on VOR performance were studied during passive head translations and rotations over a range of frequencies (0.5-4 Hz) that emphasized shifting dynamics in the VORs and visual following, primarily smooth pursuit. First, the dynamic characteristics of head movements themselves ("stimulus context") influence the VORs. Both the AVOR and LVOR operate with high-pass characteristics relative to a head velocity input, although the cutoff frequency of the AVOR (<0.1 Hz) is far below that of the LVOR ( approximately 1 Hz), and both perform well at high frequencies that exceed, but complement, the capabilities of smooth pursuit. Second, the LVOR and AVOR are modulated by fixation distance, implemented with a signal related to binocular vergence angle ("fixation context"). The effect was quantified by analyzing the response during each trial as a linear relationship between LVOR sensitivity (in deg/cm), or AVOR gain, and vergence (in m-1) to yield a slope (vergence influence) and an intercept (response at 0 vergence). Fixation distance (vergence) was modulated by presenting targets at different distances. The response slope rises with increasing frequency, but much more so for the LVOR than the AVOR, and reflects a positive relationship for all but the lowest stimulus frequencies in the AVOR. A third influence is the context of real and imagined targets on the VORs ("visual context"). This was studied in two ways-when targets were either earth-fixed to allow visual enhancement of the VOR or head-fixed to permit visual suppression. The VORs were assessed by extinguishing targets for brief periods while subjects continued to "fixate" them in darkness. The influences of real and imagined targets were most robust at lower frequencies, declining as stimulus frequency increased. The effects were nearly gone at 4 Hz. These properties were equivalent for the LVOR and AVOR and imply that the influences of real and imagined targets on the VORs generally follow low-pass and pursuit-like dynamics. The influence of imagined targets accounts for roughly one-third of the influence of real targets on the VORs at 0.5 Hz.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation.

Recent work in our laboratory has revealed that enucleated patients produce large lateral and vertical head movements during visually guided grasping. These movements may allow them to maximise the use of retinal motion cues in planning and controlling their grasp. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the tendency to produce these adaptive head movements increases as a function of time since enucleation. We tested a group of 12 enucleated patients in whom the time between surgery and testing varied from 2 weeks to 35 years (mean = 11.2 years). These patients were required to reach out and grasp oblong blocks of different sizes at different distances. Correlational tests revealed an increase in the proportion of self-generated lateral and vertical head movements versus forward head movements as a function of post-enucleation time (r(s)(12) = 0.68, p < 0.025 and r(s)(12) = 0.65, p < 0.025, respectively). This suggests that enucleated patients may be adapting to living with one eye by learning to increase the proportion of their lateral and vertical head movements during the performance of skilled motor acts.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2006

Head movement control in visually guided tasks: postural goal and optimality.

This work investigates the control of horizontal head movements in the context of unconstrained visually guided head and arm/finger aiming tasks. In a first experiment, the head was free to move while gaze was directed at randomly presented eccentric targets distributed horizontally (0 degrees-120 degrees) at eye level. In a second experiment, the horizontal head orientation was constrained to predetermined positions (0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees or 60 degrees rightward) while the right index finger aimed at targets with the arm fully extended. Kinematics of head movements in gaze displacements exhibits an initial component weakly correlated with target position, followed by multiple corrections. Since the eyes are assumed to already be aimed at the target when the corrections occur, it is suggested that one goal of head movement control is to achieve a desired final orientation (posture). This hypothesis is supported by results from the second experiment that reveal an association between eye/head orientation angles and errors exhibited in the visuo-spatial representation of the environment. The minimization of error then underlies the control of head movement as a postural response optimized for a given target and task condition.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Helmet slippage during visual tracking: the effect of voluntary head movements.

The influence of visual tracking on head movement and on the head/helmet system was investigated for two different helmets (a motorcycle helmet and a flying helmet) under static laboratory conditions. Subjects visually refixated between pairs of illuminated targets located at various horizontal (up to 160 degrees) and vertical (up to 90 degrees) distances apart while head position and helmet slippage were measured in azimuth, pitch, roll, X, Y, and Z using a double magnetic coil system. Results showed that for both helmets, root mean square (RMS) head movement increased with refixation distance, especially in the main axis of refixation, and that RMS helmet slippage can be a function of RMS head motion. Further, large individual differences in the degree of head motion were found. These findings may have implications for designers and investigators of helmet-mounted avionics.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1993

Visual-vestibular interaction in humans during active and passive, vertical head movement.

We studied visual-vestibular interaction (VVI) in 9 normal human subjects using active and passive vertical head rotations. Gain and phase of the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR) were measured for single frequency sinusoidal motion, as well as for sinusoidal motion of continuously increasing frequency, over the range of 0.4 to 4.0 Hz. In addition to measurement of VVOR during normal vision, telescopic spectacles having a magnification of 1.9x were used to challenge VVI to facilitate measurement of visual enhancement of VOR gain. In the mid-frequency range (1.6 to 2.4 Hz), the active VOR exhibited gain closer to compensatory than did the passive VOR; at other frequencies, active and passive VOR gains were similar. VVOR gain during normal vision was compensatory for both active and passive motion throughout the frequency range tested. VVOR gain with 1.9x telescopic spectacles was greater than VOR gain at all frequencies tested, including up to 3.2 Hz for passive head movements, and up to 4.0 Hz for active head movement. However, gain enhancement with telescopic spectacles was consistently greater during active than during passive head movement. Phase errors for the VOR and VVOR were small under all testing conditions. Although active VOR and VVOR were directionally symmetrical, gain of upward slow phases differed from that of downward slow phases for passive VOR and VVOR in a manner depending on rotational frequency. For both active and passive testing, gain and phase values obtained during swept frequency rotations were similar to those obtained during single frequency sinusoidal testing. These data indicate that VVI can enhance gain of the passive vertical VOR even at frequencies above what is usually considered to be the upper limit of visual pursuit tracking. The additional enhancement observed during active head movements at these high frequencies is attributable to use of efference copy of the skeletal motor command to neck musculature.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Head movements in low and high gravitoinertial force environments elicit motion sickness: implications for space motion sickness.

Astronauts report that head movements in flight tend to bring on symptoms of space motion sickness (SMS). We evaluated how head movements in pitch, yaw, and roll--made both with normal vision and eyes-occluded--affect susceptibility to motion sickness in the zero G phase of parabolic flight maneuvers. The findings are clearcut: pitch head movements are most provocative, yaw least provocative, and roll intermediate. Susceptibility is greater with normal vision than with eyes occluded. The same susceptibility pattern emerged for head movements in the 1.8-2.0 G phase of parabolic flight. These experiments suggest that SMS is not a unique nosological entity but, rather, is the consequence of exposure to nonterrestrial force levels. Head movements during departures in either direction from 1 G elicit symptoms. This implies that, rather than speaking of "space motion sickness," it would be more appropriate to think in terms of "nonterrestrial motion sickness."

Gravitation↗
PubMed2005

Instantaneous rotation axes during active head movements.

Rotation axes were calculated during active head movements using a motion analysis system. The mean rotation axis for 1 Hz head pitch when seated was posterior (6 mm) and inferior (21 mm) to the interaural axis, shifting 16 mm downwards when standing. During seated 2 Hz head pitch the rotation axis was close to the interaural axis, shifting downwards 15 mm when standing. This downward shift suggests that cervical vertebrae were recruited during head pitch with the trunk unsupported. The proximity of the pitch axis to the otoliths implies minimal otolith activation during small-amplitude, high-frequency pitch rotations, such as those encountered during locomotion. The mean rotation axis for 1 Hz yaw rotation was located slightly posterior (10 mm) to the interaural axis at the midpoint between the vestibular labyrinths when both seated and standing. In addition, the orientation of the plane of yaw rotation relative to the stereotaxic horizontal plane (pitched 5 degrees nose-down) was essentially fixed in head coordinates, regardless of the pitch orientation of the head, suggesting that yaw movements occur about an axis restricted by the mechanical structure of the atlanto-axial joint. The results demonstrate that the instantaneous rotation axes technique overcomes the inherent instability of the helical-axis representation for small head movements.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Sensitivity functions of a human head movement model.

With time as the criterion to be optimized, the divergences from optimal head movements show systematic differences of their control signal variables with respect to single behaviours. To clarify these relationships, this study uses manipulation and mathematical analysis of the 6th order nonlinear head movement model, i.e. the threefold approach of sensitivity analysis. In addition to sensitivity coefficients, graphs and trajectories sensitivity functions have been analysed. This is the sensitivity of a nominal head movement to changes of the model parameters during the time course of the movement. This demonstrated both the specific change of the visco-inertial properties of the head movement model during the movement and also the potential pathological deficits that may occur.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2006

Correction of head movement on PET studies: comparison of methods.

UNLABELLED: Head movement presents a continuing problem in PET studies. Head restraint minimizes movement but is unreliable, resulting in the need to develop alternative strategies. These include frame-by-frame (FBF) realignment or use of motion tracking (MT) during the scan to realign PET acquisition data. Here we present a comparative analysis of these 2 methods of motion correction. METHODS: Eight volunteers were examined at rest using (11)C-raclopride PET with the radioligand administered as a bolus followed by constant infusion to achieve steady state. Binding potential (BP) was estimated using the ratio method during 2 periods of the scan at steady state. Head movement was compensated by using coregistration between frames (FBF) and 3 methods using MT measurements of head position acquired with a commercially available optical tracking system. RESULTS: All methods of realignment improved test-retest reliability and noise characteristics of the raw data, with important consequences for the power to detect small changes in radiotracer binding, and the potential to reduce false-positive and false-negative results. MT methods were superior to FBF realignment using coregistration on some indices. CONCLUSION: Such methods have considerable potential to improve the reliability of PET data with important implications for the numbers of volunteers required to test hypotheses.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Stereoillusory motion concomitant with lateral head movements.

Stationary objects in a stereogram can appear to move when viewed with lateral head movements. This illusory motion can be explained by the motion-distance invariance hypothesis, which states that illusory motion covaries with perceived depth in accordance with the geometric relationship between the position of the stereo stimuli and the head. We examined two predictions based on the hypothesis. In Experiment 1, illusory motion was studied while varying the magnitude of binocular disparity and the magnitude of lateral head movement, holding viewing distance constant. In Experiment 2, illusory motion was studied while varying binocular disparity and viewing distance, holding magnitude of head movement constant. Ancillary measures of perceived depth, perceived viewing distance, and perceived magnitude of lateral head movement were also obtained. The results from the two experiments show that the extent of illusory motion varies as a function of perceived depth, supporting the motion-distance invariance hypothesis. The results also show that the extent of illusory motion is close to that predicted from the geometry in crossed disparity conditions, whereas it is greater than the predicted motion in uncrossed disparity conditions. Furthermore, predictions based on perceptual variables were no more accurate than predictions based on geometry.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Early head movements elicited by visual stimuli or collicular electrical stimulation in the cat.

During the course of previous recordings of visually-triggered gaze shifts in the head-unrestrained cat, we occasionally observed small head movements which preceded the initiation of the saccadic eye/head gaze shift toward a visual target. These early head movements (EHMs) were directed toward the target and occurred with a probability varying between animals from 0.4% to 16.4% (mean=5.2%, n=11 animals). The amplitude of EHM ranged from 0.4 degrees to 8.3 degrees (mean=1.9 degrees ), their latency from 66 to 270 ms (median=133 ms) and the delay from EHM onset to gaze shift onset averaged 183+/-108 ms (n=240). Their occurrence did not depend on visual target eccentricity in the studied range (7-35 degrees ), but influenced the metrics and dynamics of the ensuing gaze shifts (gain and velocity reduced). We also found in the two tested cats that low intensity microstimulation of the superior colliculus deeper layers elicited a head movement preceding the gaze shift. Altogether, these results suggest that the presentation of a visual target can elicit a head movement without triggering a saccadic eye/head gaze shift. The visuomotor pathways triggering these early head movements can involve the deep superior colliculus.

Animals↗