Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FACIAL EXPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

A comparison of the effects of a beta-adrenergic blocker and a benzodiazepine upon the recognition of human facial expressions.

RATIONALE: Accumulating evidence from neuropsychological and neuroimaging research suggests that facial expressions are processed by at least partially separable neurocognitive systems. Recent evidence implies that the processing of different facial expressions may also be dissociable pharmacologically by GABAergic and noradrenergic compounds, although no study has directly compared the two types of drugs. OBJECTIVE: The present study therefore directly compared the effects of a benzodiazepine with those of a beta-adrenergic blocker on the ability to recognise emotional expressions. METHODS: A double-blind, independent group design was used with 45 volunteers to compare the effects of diazepam (15 mg) and metoprolol (50 mg) with matched placebo. Participants were presented with morphed facial expression stimuli and asked to identify which of the six basic emotions (sadness, happiness, anger, disgust, fear and surprise) were portrayed. Control measures of mood, pulse rate and word recall were also taken. RESULTS: Diazepam selectively impaired participants' ability to recognise expressions of both anger and fear but not other emotional expressions. Errors were mainly mistaking fear for surprise and disgust for anger. Metoprolol did not significantly affect facial expression recognition. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are interpreted as providing further support for the suggestion that there are dissociable systems responsible for processing emotional expressions. The results may have implications for understanding why 'paradoxical' aggression is sometimes elicited by benzodiazepines and for extending our psychological understanding of the anxiolytic effects of these drugs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Facial expression in severe dementia].

Little is known about emotions and facial expression in patients suffering from severe dementia. Therefore the facial expression of nine nursing home residents with severe dementia was videotaped in different emotionally relevant situations. The video clips were analyzed according to the Facial Action Coding System. The results show complex patterns of facial expression as well as individual patterns of facial movements.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Facial expression and sarcasm.

This study examined facial expression in the presentation of sarcasm. 60 responses (sarcastic responses = 30, nonsarcastic responses = 30) from 40 different speakers were coded by two trained coders. Expressions in three facial areas--eyebrow, eyes, and mouth--were evaluated. Only movement in the mouth area significantly differentiated ratings of sarcasm from nonsarcasm.

Affect↗
PubMed1988

Facial expressions of pain and emotions in chronic TMD patients.

This research was designed to identify and validate facial expressions of pain occurring in a clinical chronic pain condition. Facial expressions of 28 patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain were videotaped during a painful clinical examination procedure and coded using an anatomically based system. Characteristics of the expressions occurring most frequently were compared with self-report measures of pain, anxiety, depression and somatic symptoms. The frequency, duration and intensity of the identified expressions were dependably correlated with pain report, but unrelated to self report of other somatic symptoms, depression or anxiety. A small number of facial expressions of specific negative emotions were also observed; pain report and pain facial expressions were higher for persons showing a greater number of negative affects. These findings support the promise of facial expressions as measures of clinical pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The effects of orientation on detection and identification of facial expressions of emotion.

Signal detection procedures were used to examine the ability of participants to detect and label facial expressions of emotion in an upright or inverted orientation when the faces were rapid videotaped presentations. The detection and identification of facial expressions were remarkably accurate. In the upright orientation, the A' measure of sensitivity was above.9 for detection and identification of all six facial expressions of emotion. Sensitivity to inverted expressions was diminished for all emotions; however, the extent of the decline in sensitivity depended upon the specific facial expression. If the expression was difficult to detect or label in the upright orientation, the sensitivity score was lower in the inverted orientation. An assessment of the errors made in the detection and labelling process allowed a demonstration of the specific facial expressions that were confused in either the upright or inverted orientation. The assessment of sensitivity and analysis of the errors suggests that the nature of perceptual processing of some, but not all, facial expressions is changed by inversion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[The effects of identity of facial expression and person on face recognition: a study using priming paradigm].

Three experiments investigated the effects of identity of facial expression and person of two successively presented faces on face recognition. In each experiment, a combination of a familiar/unfamiliar person with neutral/smile expression was presented. Four different groups of 8 or 12 undergraduates were asked to judge the facial expression or the familiarity of the second face. The results showed that reaction times in both judgments were shorter when the same person repeatedly appeared than when two different people were presented. This repetition effect was not affected by facial expression of the stimulus for expression judgments, while it depended on the expression and familiarity of the first and second faces for familiarity judgments. In facial expression judgments, reaction times to smile faces were shorter than those to the neutral faces, only when subjects were familiar with those faces. This facial expression effect appeared only when the identical familiar and smile person was repeatedly presented for familiarity judgments. These results suggested the interdependency between analysis of facial expression and that of person information in face recognition processes.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Facial expression perception: an objective outcome measure for treatment studies in mood disorders?

Facial expressions are important cues used in social communication. Studies in both patients with mood disorders and healthy volunteers have shown that facial expression perception can vary according to current mood state. Interpretation or perception of facial expressions can also be altered by administration of certain psychopharmacological agents. Novel drug development at present is restricted by the lack of valid and sensitive markers of mood state. This review suggests that measurement of facial expression perception may prove to be a useful experimental tool for assessing efficacy of antidepressant treatments.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from scenes only when they contain facial expressions.

Bilateral damage to the human amygdala impairs recognition of negatively valenced emotions from facial expressions, but it is unclear if this finding generalizes to richer visual stimuli that contain cues in addition to faces. We investigated this issue in 4 subjects with bilateral amygdala damage, 23 with unilateral amygdala damage, 22 brain-damaged controls and 16 normal individuals. Subjects were shown two blocks of complex social scenes; all stimuli in the two blocks were identical, except that the first block had all facial expressions in the image erased. While control subjects were more accurate in recognizing emotions when facial expressions were present, subjects with bilateral amygdala damage did not show the same benefit for negative emotions, often performing equivalently across the two conditions. Most striking, subjects with bilateral amygdala damage were more accurate in recognizing scenes showing anger with faces erased than with faces present, an effect resulting in part from highly abnormal recognition of certain angry facial expressions. All four subjects with bilateral amygdala damage were impaired in recognizing angry faces shown in isolation, and frequently mistook expressions of anger for smiles, a mistake never made by any control subject. Bilateral amygdala damage thus disproportionately impairs recognition of certain emotions from complex visual stimuli when subjects utilize information from facial expressions.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Spontaneous and posed facial expression in Parkinson's disease.

Spontaneous and posed emotional facial expressions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD, n = 12) were compared with those of healthy age-matched controls (n = 12). The intensity and amount of facial expression in PD patients were expected to be reduced for spontaneous but not posed expressions. Emotional stimuli were video clips selected from films, 2-5 min in duration, designed to elicit feelings of happiness, sadness, fear, disgust, or anger. Facial movements were coded using Ekman and Friesen's (1978) Facial Action Coding System (FACS). In addition, participants rated their emotional experience on 9-point Likert scales. The PD group showed significantly less overall facial reactivity than did controls when viewing the films. The predicted Group X Condition (spontaneous vs. posed) interaction effect on smile intensity was found when PD participants with more severe disease were compared with those with milder disease and with controls. In contrast, ratings of emotional experience were similar for both groups. Depression was positively associated with emotion rating but not with measures of facial activity. Spontaneous facial expression appears to be selectively affected in PD, whereas posed expression and emotional experience remain relatively intact.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Face and facial expression memory in temporal lobe epilepsy patients: preliminary results.

Right temporal lobe structures are involved in face and facial expression processing and in mnestic functions. Face and facial expression memory was investigated in 15 patients with left (LTLE) and 18 patients with right (RTLE) temporal lobe epilepsy as well as 13 healthy controls. Pairs of pictures combining four faces and four emotions had to be matched according to face identity or facial expression. In the memory tasks, the two pictures of a pair were divided by a memory interval of 2000 milliseconds, whereas in the perception tasks (control condition) both pictures were presented simultaneously. RTLE patients had significantly lower scores than healthy controls in face memory. LTLE patients had significantly lower scores than healthy controls in face and facial expression memory. The data confirm impaired face memory in RTLE patients and show that LTLE patients display deficits in face as well as in facial expression memory. Results are discussed according to functional reorganization, memory strategies, perception performance, naming problems, and group characteristics.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Facial expressions of emotion reveal neuroendocrine and cardiovascular stress responses.

BACKGROUND: The classic conception of stress involves undifferentiated negative affect and corresponding biological reactivity. The present study hypothesized a new conception, disaggregating stress into emotion-specific, contrasting patterns of biological response. Specifically, it hypothesized contrasting patterns for indignation (comprised of anger and disgust) versus fear. Moreover, it hypothesized that facial expressions of these emotions would signal corresponding biological stress responses. METHODS: Ninety-two adults engaged in annoyingly difficult stress-challenge tasks, during which cardiovascular responses, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis responses (i.e., cortisol), emotional expressions (i.e., facial muscle movements), and subjective emotional experience were assessed. RESULTS: Pronounced individual differences emerged in specific emotional responses to the stressors. Analyses of facial expressions revealed that the more fear individuals displayed in response to the stressors, the higher their cardiovascular and cortisol responses to stress. By contrast, the more indignation individuals displayed in response to the same stressors the lower their cortisol levels and cardiovascular responses. CONCLUSIONS: Facial expressions of emotion signal biological responses to stress. Fear expressions signal elevated cortisol and cardiovascular reactivity; indignation signals attenuated cortisol and cardiovascular reactivity, patterns that implicate individual differences in stress appraisals. Rather than conceptualizing stress as generalized negative affect, studies can be informed by this emotion-specific approach to stress responses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Accurate recognition of facial expressions is crucial for social functioning. In depressed individuals, implicit and explicit attentional biases away from happy and toward sad stimuli have been demonstrated. These may be associated with the negative cognitions in these individuals. METHODS: Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), neural responses to happy and sad facial expressions were measured in 14 healthy individuals and 16 individuals with major depressive disorder. RESULTS: Healthy but not depressed individuals demonstrated linear increases in response in bilateral fusiform gyri and right putamen to expressions of increasing happiness, while depressed individuals demonstrated linear increases in response in left putamen, left parahippocampal gyrus/amygdala, and right fusiform gyrus to expressions of increasing sadness. There was a negative correlation in depressed individuals between depression severity and magnitude of neural response within right fusiform gyrus to happy expressions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate preferential increases in neural response to sad but not happy facial expressions in neural regions involved in the processing of emotional stimuli in depressed individuals. These findings may be associated with the above pattern of implicit and explicit attentional biases in these individuals and suggest a potential neural basis for the negative cognitions and social dysfunction in major depression.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Event related potentials and the perception of intensity in facial expressions.

It is well known from everyday experience, that facial expressions of emotions can very much vary in intensity, e.g. ranging from mild anger to rage, or from uneasiness and mild fear to angst and panic. However, the effect of different intensities of facial expressions of emotion on event related potentials has yet not been studied. We therefore investigated 16 healthy participants with a gender decision task to male and female faces displaying angry, disgusted and fearful facial expressions varying in intensity (50%, 100%, 150%). Analysis of ERP data showed a significant increase in amplitude of the N170 by intensity, but not by type of emotion. The intensity induced negative variation was most pronounced between 200 and 600ms at electrodes P9 and P10. For this time segment, there was a clear linear relationship between intensity and degree of negative deflection. A dipole source localisation of the intensity effect using the difference waveform (150% minus 50% intensity) revealed two symmetrically positioned generators within the inferior temporo-occipital lobe. An emotion specific effect for disgust was further found at temporal electrode sites (FT7 and FT8) at around 350-400ms. Results are summarised in a two-phase model of emotion recognition, suggesting the existence of an initial monitoring process which codes saliency of incoming facial information. In a second step, the specific emotional content of faces is decoded in emotion specific recognition systems.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Electromyographic study of facial expressions during pathological laughing and crying.

We studied facial expressions during pathological laughing and crying in 6 patients using EMG investigation. Increased EMG discharges of M. frontalis and M. corrugator supercilii are characteristic of pathological laughing and crying in addition to an increase of EMG discharges of M. orbicularis oculi, M. levator labii superiors, M. zygomaticus major, M. risorius and M. mentalis which we observed during natural laughing. Its patterns of facial expressions are similar to that of crying in normals. From the fact that normals show the same expression of laughing and crying in an extreme emotional outburst, we speculate that pathological laughing and crying is maximal manifestations of facial expressions caused by a release phenomenon of the upper center.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Facial expressions of emotion: what lies beyond minimal universality?

This article discusses the controversy over whether attribution (recognition) of emotions from facial expressions is universal (P. Ekman, 1994; C. E. Izard, 1994; J. A. Russell, 1994). Agreement emerged on various issues. There exists at least Minimal Universality (people everywhere can infer something about others from their facial behavior). Anger, sadness, and other semantic categories for emotion are not pancultural and are not the precise messages conveyed by facial expressions. Emotions can occur without facial expressions, and facial expressions can occur without emotions. Further evidence is needed to determine the relationship between emotion and facial behavior, what determines that relationship, how facial behavior is interpreted, and how much the interpretation varies with culture and language. Ekman's (1994) objections are answered.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗
PubMed1998

[Young children's representational theory of mind in understanding masked facial expression].

In this study, development of young children's understandings of masked facial expression was examined from the perspective of the development of "theory of mind". In Experiment 1, short stories in which one character masks facial expressions to make another character have false beliefs were presented to 3-, 4-, and 6-year-old. They were asked questions to assess their judgements on various mental states (desire, belief, and intention) of story characters. And, to assess children's "representational theory of mind", they performed a "Smaties Task". The results showed that recognition of masked facial expression was developed from 3 to 4 years. Scores on "Smaties Task" was also improved during the same period. An additional analysis showed that the major determinant of to determine the understanding of masked facial expression was not the age but the possession of "representational theory of mind". In Experiment 2 more sophisticated but similar type of procedures were presented to 3- and 4-year-old children. Results replicated the results in Experiment 1 and the understanding of the intention of characters was also found to develop from 3 to 4 years.

Child↗
PubMed2003

Facial expressions of emotion: a cognitive neuroscience perspective.

Facial expressions are one example of emotional behavior that illustrate the importance of emotions to both basic survival and social interaction. Basic facial responses to stimuli such as sweet and bitter taste are important for species fitness and governed by simple rules. Even at this basic level, facial responses have communicative value to other species members. During evolution simple facial responses were extended for use in more complex nonverbal communications; the responses are labile. The perception and production of facial expressions are cognitive processes and numerous subcortical and cortical areas contribute to these operations. We suggest that no specific emotion center exists over and above cognitive systems in the brain, and that emotion should not be divorced from cognition.

Affect↗
PubMed2006

Impaired recognition of facial expressions of anger in Parkinson's disease patients acutely withdrawn from dopamine replacement therapy.

We have previously reported that acute dopaminergic blockade in healthy volunteers results in a transient disruption of the recognition of facial expressions of anger, whilst leaving intact the recognition of other facial expressions (including fear and disgust) and facial identity processing. Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterised by cell loss in dopaminergic neuronal populations, and hence we predicted that PD would be associated with impaired anger recognition. We reasoned that treatment with dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) could mask any deficit present in PD, and therefore studied facial expression recognition in a group of PD patients transiently withdrawn from DRT. Seventeen PD patients were compared to 21 age- and IQ-matched controls on the Ekman 60 task, which required the forced-choice labelling of 10 exemplars of each of six facial expressions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, happiness, surprise). In line with our predictions, PD patients showed a selective impairment in the recognition of facial expressions of anger. This deficit was not related to the PD patients' performance on the Benton unfamiliar-face matching task, which was normal, nor was the deficit related to overall disease severity, or to depression symptoms. However, as predicted by simulation theories, impaired anger recognition in PD was related to reduced levels of the anger-linked temperament trait, exploratory excitability. The results extend our previous findings of a role for dopamine in the processing of facial expressions of anger, and demonstrate the power of adopting a phylogenetic, comparative perspective on emotions.

Aged↗