Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ethics Committees”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Ethics committees, principles and consequences.

When ethics committees evaluate the research proposals submitted to them by biomedical scientists, they can seek guidance from laws and regulations, their own beliefs, values and experiences, and from the theories of philosophers. The starting point of this paper is that philosophers can only be helpful to the members of ethics committees if they take into account in their models both the basic moral intuitions that most of us share and the consequences of people's choices. A moral view which can be labelled as a consequentialist interpretation of mid-level principlism is developed, defended and applied to some real-life and hypothetical research proposals.

Animal Care Committees↗
PubMed1989

Institutional ethics committees: a survey of children's hospitals.

Institutional ethics committees first gained national prominence after the 1976 Karen Ann Quinlin decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court. However, it wasn't until the Federal Government promulgated the Baby Doe regulations in 1983 that significant movement occurred toward implementing such committees. Currently, statistics show that the number of ethics committees are increasing in health care institutions across the country. However, the majority of studies have focused on adult institutions. The membership of ethics committees and the objectives under which the committees function are usually addressed by the studies. Very little attention has been given to the nursing representation on the institutional ethics committee and the unique role played by nurses in the deliberation of ethical decision-making. It is the intent of this research to shed some light on the availability and functions of ethics committees within children's hospitals. Attention has also been given to the nurses' involvement on such committees. Additionally, the study takes a separate look at nursing ethics committees, their function within an institution, and the availability of ethics education for nurses. The study offers information not previously acknowledged in past studies of ethics committees. The study also opens up to consideration the unique concerns of nurses and their roles in ethical decision-making.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Clinical ethics committee.

An informal clinical ethics committee was set up to advise on ethical problems in prenatal diagnosis in Leeds. It was used twice in six months but was not called on again in the subsequent year, and we describe this experience. In North America similar committees are often used to advise on clinical moral dilemmas, and we review the published evidence from there and discuss some of the advantages and problems. Our committee's advice may have altered clinicians' actions considerably, but perhaps doctors in Britain are not yet ready to surrender this aspect of clinical autonomy.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1994

Nursing ethics committees--where are they?

When establishing Nursing Ethics Committees (NECs), statewide nursing organizations play an important role in developing and disseminating resources. The Connecticut Nurses Association Ethics and Human Rights Committee surveyed 85 healthcare facilities to identify active NECs. Representatives facilitated other committees by providing guidelines and assistance to those agencies developing NECs--the ultimate goal.

Connecticut↗
PubMed1986

The social worker's role on the institutional Ethics Committee.

As institutional Ethics Committees become more prevalent in hospitals, social workers will be serving as committee members. The evolution of IECs is reviewed; and their proposed functions of education, policy-development, case consultation and/or review are examined. Potential roles for social work in the implementation of each function are suggested.

Ethics↗
PubMed1990

Ethics committees and health services research.

Ethics committees in Britain were set up to consider clinical research. Increasingly, however, they are receiving applications for health services research which often involves several or many centres. The performance of 23 ethics committees was examined through a case-study of an application for a multi-centre non-experimental study of prostatectomy. Although all the committees approved the study, long delays occurred (mean 11.5 weeks, range 3-32 weeks), particularly in teaching districts which dealt with large numbers of applications. The composition of the committee and the frequency with which it met were not associated with the time taken to reach a decision. Some delays might be reduced by improving the design of the application forms and ensuring that at least one member of the committee has an understanding of health services research methods. Although such measures might improve the performance of committees, applicants are likely to remain in a logistic trap between funding bodies, clinicians, and ethics committees. In addition, until committees temper their concern for individualistic medical ethics with a collective ethic of the common good, health services research may continue to experience delays and difficulties.

Decision Making, Organizational↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ethics in health care, Part I: The process of ethics committees.

More than 60% of hospitals now have ethics committees, and this percentage will continue to grow. Based on personal experience as a member of several ethics committees, I suggest that ethics committees have at least 10 members and no more than 25; that active physician involvement is necessary for an effective committee; and that diversity of perspective will help a committee in performing its tasks. The functions of an ethics committee are education, policy formulation, retrospective case review, case consultation, and psychological support. Ethics committees should not have to enforce their policies, and they should not be legally liable if they do not attempt to practice medicine.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed1988

Grassroots grappling: ethics committees at rural hospitals.

Institutional ethics committees are a well-established mechanism for dealing with ethical dilemmas at large health-care institutions. The presence of these committees at small rural hospitals is a recent phenomenon. Because such hospitals are nonspecialized and isolated and have limited resources, they do not naturally encourage the development and growth of ethics committees. The experience of larger institutions with such committees is not readily adaptable, and role models are lacking. The experience of rural Vermont hospitals with ethics committees shows that these committees can function fully at small hospitals and have three stages of development. To accelerate the evolution of ethics committees at small rural hospitals, networking between these hospitals and an association with academic centers are needed. State medical societies can also support these committees by endorsing and sharing resources.

Ethics↗
PubMed2001

Research ethics committee: getting started.

Unanticipated questions arose when starting an institutional research ethics committee in Grenada. Research ethics committees are charged with the ethical review of research protocols. They serve to protect people who volunteer as research subjects from harm or wrong that may result from participating in research. The Caribbean has a rich history of medical research involving human subjects. There is a growing will in the region to establish effective and sustainable research ethics committees that adhere to international standards. This paper examines uncertainties and questions that arose in starting a research ethics committee in Grenada, and describes how uncertainties were resolved. The questions centre on which guidelines to follow, who to appoint as members, what procedures to follow, and how to train members. An additional question relates to the role of a Ministry of Health in founding a research ethics committee. Resolution of these uncertainties shows that ethical review of research can be both effective and sustainable in the Caribbean.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1992

Ethics committees in Japanese medical schools.

The present features and functions of ethics committees in 80 Japanese medical schools were surveyed by employing questionnaires. Seventy-nine schools had already established committees on each campus (however, the ethics committee at Kitasato Medical University was formally established after the completion of this survey). The major role of Japanese ethics committees may be said roughly to correspond to that of Institutional Review Boards (IRB) in the U.S., although ethics committees have other functions as well. Among the ethics committees' many problems, two significant weaknesses should be underscored. The first is the inappropriate composition of the membership of the committees: more non-campus members, younger professionals, and women should be invited to participate. The second concern is the committees' essentially closed review process: this process has not been adequately open to the public even in cases in which the issue of the patient's confidentiality does not arise. However, several schools are now preparing to open their meetings to non-members and this policy should improve the present situation. It is fortunate, however, that the ethics committees in Japan's medical schools were established by members from each campus and not as a response to national directives or legislation.

Community Participation↗
PubMed1989

Ethics committees in small hospitals.

Ethics committees at small hospitals confront most of the same ethical dilemmas present at large hospitals, but must usually deal with them with fewer resources and less access to recognized expertise. Nonetheless small hospital committees can function effectively in the areas of education, policy deliberation, and case consultation. The development of ethics committees at two small Vermont hospitals is described, noting some of the problems associated with smallness and making suggestions about how to surmount them.

Ethics↗
PubMed2001

Healthcare ethics committees and managed care.

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare ethics committees (HECs) play an important role in medical decision making in US hospitals, but no study has determined whether HECs deal with managed care, in any form. This pilot study was performed to evaluate the activities and perceptions of HECs about managed care. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-five hospitals in the Philadelphia area were selected at random, and comprised 36.6% of area institutions and 47% of area inpatient beds. Surveys were administered to ethics committee representatives by the authors in 1998. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survey responses were coded, and both tabulated responses and analyzed data are presented. Correlations were analyzed with the unpaired 2-tailed t test. RESULTS: HECs devoted 7.6% of committee time to managed care issues, and the remainder to education, policy development, and case consultation. Time spent on managed care issues depended on the size of the institution (small hospitals spent twice the time on managed care as did large institutions); composition of the committee (presence of clergy and retirees on HECs correlated with the likelihood that HECs would address managed care issues); and whether the HEC was requested to help with managed care issues. Of the HECs surveyed, 18% had formal but disparging discussions of ethical concerns in managed care. The impact of changing insurance programs on the hospital and HECs was a concern. CONCLUSIONS: HECs arbitrate ethical conflicts in managed care when asked. As the presence of managed care increases, ethics committees will increasingly be called on to resolve the resulting ethical dilemmas. To be effective in this role, HECs must become knowledgeable about managed care principles and policies.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2000

Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?

The function of local research ethics committees is to consider the ethics of research proposals using human participants. After approval has been given, there is no comprehensive system in place to monitor research and ensure that recommendations are carried out. Some suggest that research ethics committees are ideally placed to fulfil this function by carrying out random monitoring of research they have reviewed. The health service guideline creating local research ethics committees is under review. This paper suggests that increasing the monitoring role of ethics committees in the present climate would be inappropriate. This is due to the large workload of the committees, their voluntary nature and the change a monitoring role might cause to the relationship between researcher and ethics committee, which might herald an increasing recourse to judicial review. A radical overhaul of the system would be necessary in order for ethics committees adequately to fulfil a monitoring function.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1989

Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.

A survey of ethics committees in district health authorities was carried out to find out the size and make up of committees and what information and guidance they offered to scientists who apply to do research. A sample (n = 28) of committees in England (n = 190), half from teaching districts and half from non-teaching districts, was contacted by post requesting this information. A high degree of diversity was found, not only in the methods that committees used but also in the ethical criteria each considered to be pertinent for research. It was also shown that published guidelines have made little impact. It is suggested that issuing more guidelines will be of limited use. Rather, the following are needed: information about why guidelines have been widely ignored, better communication between committees, some form of education for committee members, and a formal register of committees compiled.

England↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ethics committees in long-term care facilities.

Biomedical ethical dilemmas occur in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly in the absence of residents' advance directives. Ethics committees are required in hospitals and long-term care facilities accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), but many LTCFs do not have JCAHO accreditation. A survey of LTCFs in one county in a Southwestern state found that only 29% of those LTCFs responding had an organized ethics committee. This article discusses the purpose, membership, and meetings of an ethics committee in LTCFs. A sample process for resolving a biomedical ethical dilemma is presented. Nurses can initiate the development of an ethics committee using available resources or combining resources with other local LTCFs. The ethics committee should consider the education of all persons involved to facilitate resolution of clinical ethical dilemmas.

Advance Directives↗
PubMed1997

Paediatrics at the cutting edge: do we need clinical ethics committees?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the need for hospital clinical ethics committees by studying the frequency with which ethical dilemmas arose, the perceived adequacy of the process of their resolution, and the teaching and training of staff in medical ethics. DESIGN: Interviews with individuals and three multidisciplinary teams; questionnaire to randomly selected individuals. SETTING: Two major London children's hospitals. RESULTS: Ethical dilemmas arose frequently but were resolved in a relatively unstructured fashion. Ethical concerns included: the validity of consent for investigations and treatment; lack of children's involvement in consent; initiation of heroic or futile treatments; resource allocation. Staff expressed the need for a forum which would provide consultation on ethical issues, develop guidelines for good ethical practice, undertake teaching and training, and provide ethical reflection outside the acute clinical setting. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary, accountable and audited clinical ethics committees with predominantly advisory, practice development and educational roles could provide a valuable contribution to UK clinical practice and perhaps in other countries that have not developed hospital clinical ethics committees.

Child↗