Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endocannabinoids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Characterization of a novel endocannabinoid, virodhamine, with antagonist activity at the CB1 receptor.

The first endocannabinoid, anandamide, was discovered in 1992. Since then, two other endocannabinoid agonists have been identified, 2-arachidonyl glycerol and, more recently, noladin ether. Here, we report the identification and pharmacological characterization of a novel endocannabinoid, virodhamine, with antagonist properties at the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Virodhamine is arachidonic acid and ethanolamine joined by an ester linkage. Concentrations of virodhamine measured by liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry in rat brain and human hippocampus were similar to anandamide. In peripheral tissues that express the CB2 cannabinoid receptor, virodhamine concentrations were 2- to 9-fold higher than anandamide. In contrast to previously described endocannabinoids, virodhamine was a partial agonist with in vivo antagonist activity at the CB1 receptor. However, at the CB2 receptor, virodhamine acted as a full agonist. Transport of [(14)C]anandamide by RBL-2H3 cells was inhibited by virodhamine. Virodhamine produced hypothermia in the mouse and acted as an antagonist in the presence of anandamide both in vivo and in vitro. As a potential endogenous antagonist at the CB1 receptor, virodhamine adds a new form of regulation to the endocannabinoid system.

Animals↗

Stimulation of endocannabinoid formation in brain slice cultures through activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Activation of group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors drives the endocannabinoid system to cause both short- and long-term changes of synaptic strength in the striatum, hippocampus, and other brain areas. Although there is strong electrophysiological evidence for a role of endocannabinoid release in mGlu receptor-dependent plasticity, the identity of the endocannabinoid transmitter mediating this phenomenon remains undefined. In this study, we show that activation of group I mGlu receptors triggers the biosynthesis of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), but not anandamide, in primary cultures of corticostriatal and hippocampal slices prepared from early postnatal rat brain. Pharmacological studies suggest that 2-AG biosynthesis is initiated by activation of mGlu5 receptors, is catalyzed by phospholipase C (PLC) and 1,2-diacylglycerol lipase (DGL) activities, and is dependent on intracellular Ca2+ ions. Realtime polymerase chain reaction and immunostaining analyses indicate that DGL-beta is the predominant DGL isoform expressed in corticostriatal and hippocampal slices and that this enzyme is highly expressed in striatal neurons, where it is colocalized with PLC-beta1. The results suggest that 2-AG is a primary endocannabinoid mediator of mGlu receptor-dependent neuronal plasticity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Endocannabinoid identification in the brain: studies of breakdown lead to breakthrough, and there may be NO hope.

Endocannabinoids are a class of fatty acid derivatives defined by their ability to interact with the specific cannabinoid receptors that were originally identified as the targets of Delta9-tetrahydocannabinol (Delta9-THC), the psychoactive component of cannabis. Endocannabinoids have been implicated in a growing number of important physiological and behavioral events. A full understanding of the functions of endocannabinoids will involve knowing which ones are active, and how they are produced, during any given physical event. However, studying these small lipids in the brain presents many technical challenges. New selective pharmacological tools promise to be very useful in unraveling the complexities of endocannabinoid signaling, but parallel developments from the investigation of the cellular neurophysiology of the endocannabinoid systems highlight the difficulties remaining.

Amidohydrolases↗

Endocannabinoid overactivity and intestinal inflammation.

Cannabinoid receptors of type 1 and 2 (CB(1) and CB(2)), endogenous ligands that activate them (endocannabinoids), and mechanisms for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and inactivation have been identified in the gastrointestinal system. Activation of CB(1 )receptors by endocannabinoids produces relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter and inhibition of gastric acid secretion, intestinal motility, and fluid stimulated secretion. However, stimulation of cannabinoid receptors impacts on gastrointestinal functions in several other ways. Recent data indicate that the endocannabinoid system in the small intestine and colon becomes over stimulated during inflammation in both animal models and human inflammatory disorders. The pathological significance of this "endocannabinoid overactivity" and its possible exploitation for therapeutic purposes are discussed here.

Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators↗

The therapeutic potential of drugs that target cannabinoid receptors or modulate the tissue levels or actions of endocannabinoids.

There are at least 2 types of cannabinoid receptor, CB(1) and CB(2), both G protein coupled. CB(1) receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals and mediate inhibition of transmitter release, whereas CB(2) receptors are found mainly on immune cells, their roles including the modulation of cytokine release and of immune cell migration. Endogenous agonists for cannabinoid receptors also exist. These "endocannabinoids" are synthesized on demand and removed from their sites of action by cellular uptake and intracellular enzymic hydrolysis. Endocannabinoids and their receptors together constitute the endocannabinoid system. This review summarizes evidence that there are certain central and peripheral disorders in which increases take place in the release of endocannabinoids onto their receptors and/or in the density or coupling efficiency of these receptors and that this upregulation is protective in some disorders but can have undesirable consequences in others. It also considers therapeutic strategies by which this upregulation might be modulated to clinical advantage. These strategies include the administration of (1) a CB(1) and/or CB(2) receptor agonist or antagonist that does or does not readily cross the blood brain barrier; (2) a CB(1) and/or CB(2) receptor agonist intrathecally or directly to some other site outside the brain; (3) a partial CB(1) and/or CB(2) receptor agonist rather than a full agonist; (4) a CB(1) and/or CB(2) receptor agonist together with a noncannabinoid, for example, morphine or codeine; (5) an inhibitor or activator of endocannabinoid biosynthesis, cellular uptake, or metabolism; (6) an allosteric modulator of the CB(1) receptor; and (7) a CB(2) receptor inverse agonist.

Animals↗

Methods evaluating cannabinoid and endocannabinoid effects on gastrointestinal functions.

This chapter briefly describes the physiological neural mechanisms by which diverse neurotransmitter receptor systems control several aspects of gastrointestinal functions such as motility, secretion, feeding, and emesis. The current techniques used to study the effects of cannabinoids on these gastrointestinal functions are then sequentially described, starting with isolated gastrointestinal muscle preparations and ultimately evolving to whole animal models. Both delta9-tetrahydrocannibinol (delta9-THC) and well-studied representatives of other classes of exogenous cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonists inhibit gastrointestinal motility, peristalsis, defecation, and secretions via cannabinoid CB1 receptors since the CB1 (SR141716A)- and not the CB2 (SR144528)-receptor antagonist reverses these effects in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, exogenous cannabinoids inhibit vomiting produced by diverse emetic stimuli in a SR141716A-sensitive manner in different animal models of emesis. Often these cannabinoids produce hyperphagic effects under laboratory conditions in most human and animal models of feeding. Administration of SR141716A by itself can produce effects opposite to cannabinoid agonists (e.g., increases in gastrointestinal motility and secretions, hyperphagia and vomiting), which suggests an important role for endocannabinoids in these gastrointestinal functions. Indeed, the presence of cannabinoid CB1 receptor markers, endocannabinoids such as anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), their metabolic enzymes, and an endocannabinoid reuptake system have been confirmed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The well-studied endocannabinoid anandamide also seems to reduce both gastrointestinal motility and secretion while producing hyperphagia. On the other hand, while the less well-investigated endocannabinoid 2-AG is a potent emetogen, anandamide may possess weak antiemetic activity.

Animals↗

Acute neuronal injury, excitotoxicity, and the endocannabinoid system.

The endocannabinoid system is a valuable target for drug discovery, because it is involved in the regulation of many cellular and physiological functions. The endocannabinoid system constitutes the endogenous lipids anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol and noladin ether, and the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as well as the proteins for their inactivation. It is thought that (endo)cannabinoid-based drugs may potentially be useful to reduce the effects of neurodegeneration. This paper reviews recent developments in the endocannabinoid system and its involvement in neuroprotection. Exogenous (endo)cannabinoids have been shown to exert neuroprotection in a variety of in vitro and in vivo models of neuronal injury via different mechanisms, such as prevention of excitotoxicity by CB1-mediated inhibition of glutamatergic transmission, reduction of calcium influx, and subsequent inhibition of deleterious cascades, TNF-alpha formation, and anti-oxidant activity. It has been suggested that the release of endogenous endocannabinoids during neuronal injury might be a protective response. However, several observations indicate that the role of the endocannabinoid system as a general endogenous protection system is questionable. The data are critically reviewed and possible explanations are given.

Acute Disease↗

Dual modulation of endocannabinoid transport and fatty acid amide hydrolase protects against excitotoxicity.

The endocannabinoid system has been suggested to elicit signals that defend against several disease states including excitotoxic brain damage. Besides direct activation with CB1 receptor agonists, cannabinergic signaling can be modulated through inhibition of endocannabinoid transport and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), two mechanisms of endocannabinoid inactivation. To test whether the transporter and FAAH can be targeted pharmacologically to modulate survival/repair responses, the transport inhibitor N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-arachidonamide (AM404) and the FAAH inhibitor palmitylsulfonyl fluoride (AM374) were assessed for protection against excitotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. AM374 and AM404 both enhanced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation in cultured hippocampal slices. Interestingly, combining the distinct inhibitors produced additive effects on CB1 signaling and associated neuroprotection. After an excitotoxic insult in the slices, infusing the AM374/AM404 combination protected against cytoskeletal damage and synaptic decline, and the protection was similar to that produced by the stable CB1 agonist AM356 (R-methanandamide). AM374/AM404 and the agonist also elicited cytoskeletal and synaptic protection in vivo when coinjected with excitotoxin into the dorsal hippocampus. Correspondingly, potentiating endocannabinoid responses with the AM374/AM404 combination prevented behavioral alterations and memory impairment that are characteristic of excitotoxic damage. The protective effects mediated by AM374/AM404 were (1) evident 7 d after insult, (2) correlated with the preservation of CB1-linked MAPK signaling, and (3) were blocked by a selective CB1 antagonist. These results indicate that dual modulation of the endocannabinoid system with AM374/AM404 elicits neuroprotection through the CB1 receptor. The transporter and FAAH are modulatory sites that may be exploited to enhance cannabinergic signaling for therapeutic purposes.

Amidohydrolases↗

Dopamine modulation of state-dependent endocannabinoid release and long-term depression in the striatum.

Endocannabinoids are important mediators of short- and long-term synaptic plasticity, but the mechanisms of endocannabinoid release have not been studied extensively outside the hippocampus and cerebellum. Here, we examined the mechanisms of endocannabinoid-mediated long-term depression (eCB-LTD) in the dorsal striatum, a brain region critical for motor control and reinforcement learning. Unlike other cell types, strong depolarization of medium spiny neurons was not sufficient to yield detectable endocannabinoid release. However, when paired with postsynaptic depolarization sufficient to activate L-type calcium channels, activation of postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), either by high-frequency tetanic stimulation or an agonist, induced eCB-LTD. Pairing bursts of afferent stimulation with brief subthreshold membrane depolarizations that mimicked down-state to up-state transitions also induced eCB-LTD, which not only required activation of mGluRs and L-type calcium channels but also was bidirectionally modulated by dopamine D2 receptors. Consistent with network models, these results demonstrate that dopamine regulates the induction of a Hebbian form of long-term synaptic plasticity in the striatum. However, this gating of plasticity by dopamine is accomplished via an unexpected mechanism involving the regulation of mGluR-dependent endocannabinoid release.

Animals↗

The endocannabinoid system promotes astroglial differentiation by acting on neural progenitor cells.

Endocannabinoids exert an important neuromodulatory role via presynaptic cannabinoid CB1 receptors and may also participate in the control of neural cell death and survival. The function of the endocannabinoid system has been extensively studied in differentiated neurons, but its potential role in neural progenitor cells remains to be elucidated. Here we show that the CB1 receptor and the endocannabinoid-inactivating enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase are expressed, both in vitro and in vivo, in postnatal radial glia (RC2+ cells) and in adult nestin type I (nestin(+)GFAP+) neural progenitor cells. Cell culture experiments show that CB1 receptor activation increases progenitor proliferation and differentiation into astroglial cells in vitro. In vivo analysis evidences that, in postnatal CB1(-/-) mouse brain, progenitor proliferation and astrogliogenesis are impaired. Likewise, in adult CB1-deficient mice, neural progenitor proliferation is decreased but is increased in fatty acid amide hydrolase-deficient mice. In addition, endocannabinoid signaling controls neural progenitor differentiation in the adult brain by promoting astroglial differentiation of newly born cells. These results show a novel physiological role of endocannabinoids, which constitute a new family of signaling cues involved in the regulation of neural progenitor cell function.

Amidohydrolases↗

Endocannabinoids in the central nervous system: from neuronal networks to behavior.

Retrograde synaptic signaling influences both short-term and long-term plasticity of the brain, in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. During the last few years it has become apparent that the endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid CB1 receptor, the "endocannabinoids", fulfill an essential role in the brain as retrograde synaptic messengers, in a number of structures including the hippocampus, cerebellum and the limbic and mesocortical systems. This seminal discovery provides a cellular basis for the well known ubiquitous role of the endocannabinoids and their receptors (together, the "ECBR" system) in virtually all brain functions studied. This review will relate the anatomical distribution of the endocannabinoids and their CB1 receptors to functions of the ECBR system, as much as possible in light of the endocannabinoids as retrograde synaptic messengers. Functional implications of the high rates of co-localization with cholecystokinin (CCK), will also be considered. The most obvious function to be profoundly affected by the retrograde synaptic role of the endocannabinoids is memory. However, additional functions and dysfunctions such as reward and addiction, motor coordination, pain perception, feeding and appetite, coping with stress, schizophrenia and epilepsy will also be reviewed. Finally, the widespread presence of the ECBR system in the brain also lends a scientific basis for the development of cannabinoid-based medicines. The same ubiquity of the ECBR system however, should also be taken into consideration with respect to possible adverse side effects and addictive potential of such pharmaceutical developments.

Animals↗

Endocannabinoid metabolic pathways and enzymes.

Endocannabinoids, defined in 1995 as endogenous agonists of cannabinoid receptors, their anabolic and catabolic pathways, and the enzymes involved in these pathways (the "endocannabinoid enzymes"), are the subject of this review. A general strategy seems to apply to the regulation of the levels of the two major endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). Five endocannabinoid enzymes have been cloned to date: two are responsible for the biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide, the NAPE-selective phospholipase D and the fatty acid amide hydrolase, respectively; the other three catalyse the biosynthesis and degradation of 2-AG, the sn-1-selective diacylglycerol lipases alpha and beta and the monoacylglycerol lipase, respectively. The major features of these five proteins, their relative weight in determining endocannabinoid levels, and the possible targeting of some of them for therapeutic purpose, as well as the possibility of the existence of alternative anabolic and catabolic pathways are discussed.

Animals↗

[The endocannabinoid system as a target for the development of new drugs for cancer therapy].

Studies on the main bioactive components of Cannabis sativa, the cannabinoids, and particularly delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), led to the discovery of a new endogenous signalling system that controls several physiological and pathological conditions: the endocannabinoid system. This comprises the cannabinlid receptors, their endogenous agonists--the endocannabinoids--and proteins for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and inactivation. Recently, evidence has accumulated indicating that stimulation of cannabinoid receptors by either THC or the endocannabinoids influence the intracellular events controlling the proliferation and apoptosis of numerous types of cancer cells, thereby leading to anti-tumour effects both in vitro and in vivo. This evidence is reviewed here and suggests that future anti-cancer therapy might be developed from our knowledge of how the endocannabinoid system controls the growth and metastasis of malignant cells.

Adult↗

Endocannabinoid synthesis and degradation, and their regulation in the framework of energy balance.

Endocannabinoids are endogenous substances capable of binding to and functionally activating the two types of cannabinoid receptors identified to date, the cannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2 receptors). The anabolic and catabolic pathways for the two most studied endocannabinoids, N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2- AG), have been elucidated, thus leading to the molecular characterization of some of their catabolic and biosynthetic enzymes. These proteins are hydrolytic enzymes that also recognize as substrates other congeners of anandamide and 2-AG or of their biosynthetic precursors, respectively. CB1 receptor and tissue concentrations of endocannabinoids sufficient to activate them are more widely distributed than originally believed, and are present in all brain and peripheral organs involved in the control of energy homeostasis, including the hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, brainstem, vagus nerve, gastrointestinal trad, adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Hypothalamic and peripheral neuropeptides and hormones involved in energy balance, as well as the type of diet, regulate endocannabinoid biosynthetic and inactivating pathways, whereas endocannabinoids, in turn, regulate the expression and action of mediators involved in nutrient intake and processing. The perturbation of these cross-talks might contribute to the development of eating disorders.

Animals↗

Alleviation of motor hyperactivity and neurochemical deficits by endocannabinoid uptake inhibition in a rat model of Huntington's disease.

Recent studies have demonstrated a loss of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the postmortem basal ganglia of patients affected by Huntington's disease (HD) and in transgenic mouse models for this disease. These studies have led to the notion that substances that increase the endocannabinoid activity, such as receptor agonists or inhibitors of endocannabinoid uptake and/or metabolism, might be useful in the treatment of hyperkinetic symptoms of this disease. In the present study, we employed a rat model of HD generated by bilateral intrastriatal injections of 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP), a toxin that selectively damages striatal GABAergic efferent neurons. These rats exhibited biphasic motor disturbances, with an early (1-2 weeks) hyperactivity followed by a late (3-4 weeks) motor depression. Analysis of GABA, dopamine, and their related enzymes, glutamic acid decarboxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase, in the basal ganglia proved marked decreases compatible with the motor hyperkinesia. In addition, mRNA levels for CB1 receptor, neuronal-specific enolase, proenkephalin, and substance P decreased in the caudate-putamen of 3-NP-injected rats. There were also reductions in CB1 receptor binding in the caudate putamen, the globus pallidus, and, to a lesser extent, the substantia nigra. By contrast, mRNA levels for tyrosine hydroxylase in the substantia nigra remained unaffected. Interestingly, the administration of AM404, an inhibitor of endocannabinoid uptake, to 3-NP-injected rats attenuated motor disturbances observed in the early phase of hyperactivity. Administration of AM404 also tended to induce recovery from the neurochemical deficits caused by the toxin in GABA and dopamine indices in the basal ganglia. In summary, morphological, behavioral, and biochemical changes observed in rats intrastriatally lesioned with 3-NP acid were compatible with a profound degeneration of striatal efferent GABAergic neurons, similar to that occurring in the brain of HD patients. As expected, a loss of CB1 receptors was evident in the basal ganglia of these rats. However, the administration of substances that increase endocannabinoid activity, by inhibiting the uptake process, allowed an activation of the remaining population of CB1 receptors, resulting in a significant improvement of motor disturbances and neurochemical deficits. These observations might be relevant to the treatment of hyperkinetic symptoms in HD, a human disorder with unsatisfactory symptomatic treatment for most patients.

Animals↗

Retrograde signalling by endocannabinoids.

The cannabinoid neurotransmitter system comprises cannabinoid G protein-coupled membrane receptors (CB1 and CB2), endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids), as well as mechanisms for their synthesis, membrane transport and metabolism. Within the brain the marijuana constituent delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produces its pharmacological actions by acting on cannabinoid CB1 receptors. THC modulates neuronal excitability by inhibiting synaptic transmission via presynaptic CB1-mediated mechanisms. More recently, it has been established that physiological stimulation of neurons can induce the synthesis of endocannabinoids, which also modulate synaptic transmission via cannabinoid CB1 and other receptor systems. These endogenously synthesised endocannabinoids appear to act as retrograde signalling agents, reducing synaptic inputs onto the stimulated neuron in a highly selective and restricted manner. In this review we describe the cellular mechanisms underlying retrograde endocannabinoid signalling.

Animals↗

The phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary origins of endocannabinoid signalling.

The endocannabinoid signalling system in mammals comprises several molecular components, including cannabinoid receptors (e.g. CB1, CB2), putative endogenous ligands for these receptors [e.g. anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)] and enzymes involved in the biosynthesis and inactivation of anandamide (e.g. NAPE-PLD, FAAH) and 2-AG (e.g. DAG lipase, MGL). In this review we examine the occurrence of these molecules in non-mammalian organisms (in particular, animals and plants) by surveying published data and by basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analysis of the GenBank database and of genomic sequence data from several vertebrate and invertebrate species. We conclude that the ability of cells to synthesise molecules that are categorised as "endocannabinoids" in mammals is an evolutionarily ancient phenomenon that may date back to the unicellular common ancestor of animals and plants. However, exploitation of these molecules for intercellular signalling may have occurred independently in different lineages during the evolution of the eukaryotes. The CB1- and CB2-type receptors that mediate effects of endocannabinoids in mammals occur throughout the vertebrates, and an orthologue of vertebrate cannabinoid receptors was recently identified in the deuterostomian invertebrate Ciona intestinalis (CiCBR). However, orthologues of the vertebrate cannabinoid receptors are not found in protostomian invertebrates (e.g. Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans). Therefore, it is likely that a CB1/CB2-type cannabinoid receptor originated in a deuterostomian invertebrate. This phylogenetic information provides a basis for exploitation of selected non-mammalian organisms as model systems for research on endocannabinoid signalling.

Amidohydrolases↗

Endocannabinoid signaling directs periimplantation events.

An emerging concept in female reproduction is the role of endocannabinoids, a group of endogenously produced lipid mediators that bind to and activate cannabinoid receptors. Although adverse effects of cannabinoids in female reproduction have been implicated for years, the mechanisms by which they exert these effects remained elusive. With the identification of cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoid ligands, their key synthetic and hydrolytic pathways, and the generation of knockout mouse models for cannabinoid receptors, a wealth of information is now available regarding the significance of cannabinoid/endocannabinoid signaling in early pregnancy. This review focuses on various aspects of endocannabinoid signaling in preimplantation embryo development and activation, and uterine differentiation during the periimplantation embryo-uterine dialog. It is hoped that a deeper understanding will lead to potential clinical applications of the endocannabinoid system as a target for regulating female fertility.

Animals↗