Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Embryonic Induction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Glandular epithelial induction by embryonic mesenchyme in adult bladder epithelium of BALB/c mice.

Tissue recombinants prepared with epithelium of the urinary bladder of adult mice and mesenchyme of the embryonic urogenital sinus were grown as renal capsular grafts in adult male hosts. Under these conditions the bladder epithelium, which is derived embryologically from the urogenital sinus, was induced to form prostate-like acini. The relevance of this observation to McNeal's (1978) hypothesis, that the formation of prostatic acini during the development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia may be a reexpression of the embryonic inductive capacity of the prostatic stroma, is discussed.

Animals↗

Continuity and change: paradigm shifts in neural induction.

The problem of "primary embryonic induction" was one of the first areas of developmental biology to become "molecularized." What had been seen as an intractable series of problems became amenable to the techniques of Northern blotting, ectopic RNA insertion, and in situ hybridization. These molecular analyses showed that some of the fundamental concepts of primary embryonic induction concluded by experimental embryologists were false. First, primary embryonic induction was not primary. The organizer tissue, itself, was the product of a prior induction. Second, the neural fate of cells was not being induced. Rather, the epidermal fate was induced and the neural state was the default, uninduced, fate of ectodermal tissues. Third, primary embryonic induction was not something unique to vertebrates. Rather, the ventral neural cord of insects formed using the same mechanisms as the dorsal neural tube of vertebrates. Fourth, the brain formed in a matter distinctly different from that the spinal cord. Despite these differences, there has been a clear and strong continuity between the experimental embryological tradition and the molecular genetic tradition, and these new results are seen by many contemporary developmental geneticists as strengthening, rather than destroying, the older science.

Animals↗

Epidermal growth factor can replace thymic mesenchyme in induction of embryonic thymus morphogenesis in vitro.

The thymus is surrounded by a thin layer of mesenchyme and the epithelial-mesenchymal interaction is known to be essential for the thymus development. To clarify the roles of mesenchyme in the thymus lobule formation that occurs around embryonic days 14-15 in vivo, we set up a three-dimensional organ culture system. The epithelium of embryonic day 14 thymic primordium was separated from the mesenchyme and cultured in Matrigel (reconstituted basement membrane). Addition of the mesenchyme to a chamber separated by a membrane filter induced the lobule formation of the thymic epithelium in vitro. We found that epidermal growth factor (EGF) can replace the mesenchyme for lobulation of the embryonic thymus in vitro. Among other growth factors tested, only transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha was as effective as EGF, in agreement with the fact that EGF and TGF-alpha bind to the same receptor. These results suggest that EGF or its family members may be involved in morphogenesis and differentiation of the thymus gland epithelium, although we cannot exclude the possibility that other unknown factors are required in vivo.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

[Establishment, maintenance and differentiation induction of embryonic stem cells].

Embryonic stem(ES) cells are the cell lines derived from the inner cell mass of early preimplantation embryos at blastocyst stage. Mouse ES cells are pluripotent since the cells can be differentiated into all lineages of the cells once re-introduced into blastocysts. Human ES cells have been established from the inner cell mass of blastocysts which are developed from surplus embryos obtained by in vitro fertilization. ES cells are considered valuable resource of regeneration medicine because of their vigorous proliferative activity and broad differentiation capacity. Establishment, maintenance and in vitro differentiation of the cells are key points for the utilization of ES cells in regeneration medicine.

Animals↗

Embryonic lens induction: shedding light on vertebrate tissue determination.

The principle of embryonic induction was defined by early studies of lens determination, and because of the relative simplicity of the developing lens and its interaction with presumptive retinal tissue it has been a favored system for examining mechanisms of induction. Recent studies have led to substantial alterations of the classic model for this process, introducing several elements that significantly refine our view of vertebrate tissue determination.

Animals↗

Extracellular matrix organized in embryonic cavities during induction of the embryonic axis in chick embryo.

Extracellular matrix (ECM) is detected as short, disorganized fibrils in the forming embryonic extracellular spaces shortly prior to the first morphogenetic cellular movements and interactions in the early chick embryo. As development progresses, the ECM is organized into an intricate network spanning the embryonic cavities. This dynamic entity undergoes relatively rapid changes in its organization pattern during the developmental period from morula to the induction of the neural plate. The ECM seems to preserve the exquisite architecture of the embryo and could guide migrating cells into defined pathways in the early embryo.

Animals↗

Embryonic lens induction: more than meets the optic vesicle.

The classic model of lens induction stipulated that the optic vesicle is both a necessary and sufficient inductor of the lens in amphibian development. Although this view has subsequently been modified to encompass the contributions of earlier inductors, such as the involuting endo-mesoderm, it is still widely reported that the optic vesicle alone is able to elicit lens formation from ectoderm. Recent work, which has employed a host- and donor-marking scheme, has shown the optic vesicle to be a weak inductor of the lens, involved only in the final rather than the initial phases of determination. In addition, a review of the literature substantiates this conclusion since many of the transplantation experiments arguing for the sufficiency of the optic vesicle are characterized by the lack of adequate criteria for judging the authenticity of the resulting lens responses, particularly the absence of a host- and donor-marking strategy. This analysis of the literature, together with our own results, lead us to propose a new model of lens determination in which tissue interactions during gastrulation are required to confer a lens-forming bias upon a large area of head ectoderm allowing the optic vesicle to induce lens formation in a defined area of this primed ectoderm. Data from studies on mesoderm and neural induction are also beginning to suggest a multistep model involving the initial establishment of bias and subsequent interactions resulting in determination, and we propose that this framework will serve as a general paradigm for embryonic induction.

Amphibians↗

glp-1 and inductions establishing embryonic axes in C. elegans.

Two successive inductions specify blastomere identities, that is complex cell lineages and not specific tissues, in a major part of the early C. elegans embryo. The first induction acts along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo and the second along the left-right axis. During the first induction a specific lineage program is induced in the posterior of the two AB blastomeres present in the four cell embryo. During the second induction, almost all of the left-right differences of the embryo are specified by interactions between a single signalling blastomere, MS, and the AB blastomeres that surround it. In both cases the inductions break the equivalence of pairs of blastomeres. The inductions correlate with the cell-cell contacts to the inducing blastomeres. The stereotype cleavage patterns of the early embryo results in invariant cell-cell contacts that guarantee the specificity of the inductions. Both inductions are affected in embryos mutant for glp-1 suggesting that in both cases glp-1 is involved in the reception of the signal.

Animals↗

Control of the embryonic body plan by activin during amphibian development.

Embryonic induction plays an important role in establishing the fundamental body plan during early amphibian development. The factors mediating this embryonic induction have, however, only recently been discovered. In the mid-1980's, certain peptide growth factors belonging to the FGF and TGF-beta families were found to have a mesoderm-inducing effect on isolated Xenopus blastula ectoderm. The study of embryonic induction subsequently expanded rapidly and knowledge at the molecular level has gradually accumulated. One of these peptide growth factors, activin, a member of the TGF-beta superfamily, is present maternally in the Xenopus early embryo and induces various mesodermal and endodermal tissues in isolated presumptive ectoderm. After exposure of presumptive ectoderm to activin, many genes are expressed in the same manner as in normal embryogenesis. Ectoderm treated with activin can induce a complete secondary embryo, the same as the organizer does in transplantation experiments. These findings suggest that activin is one of the first induction signals responsible for establishing the embryonic body plan in early amphibian development. In this article we shall review to what extent we can control the embryonic body plan in vitro, referring to some significant findings in this field.

Activins↗

Interaction between growth factors and retinoic acid in the induction of kidney tubulogenesis in tissue culture.

Kidney tubulogenesis is the initial step in renal organogenesis. The precise molecular determinants of this pattern formation are presently unknown, although soluble factors, such as growth factors, and insoluble factors, such as extracellular matrix molecules, most likely play fundamental roles in this process. To define the molecular determinants of renal proximal tubule morphogenesis, primary cultures of rabbit renal proximal tubule cells in hormonally defined, serum-free media were treated with transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and the retinoid, all trans-retinoic acid (RA), singly or in combination. Utilizing phase contrast and light and transmission electron microscopy, the simultaneous administration of TGF-beta 1 (10 ng/ml), EGF (1 nM), and RA (0.1 nM) transformed a confluent monolayer of renal proximal tubule cells within 5 to 6 days into three-dimensional cell aggregates containing lumens within the interior of the cell clusters. The lumens were bordered by tubule cells possessing a polarized epithelial cell phenotype with extensive microvilli formation and tight junctional complexes along the luminal border. All three factors were necessary and sufficient to induce this phenotypic transformation. Further studies demonstrated that RA promoted the deposition of the A and B1 chains of laminin, a cell attachment protein of the basement membrane, in a small subset of proximal tubule cells in culture, as deduced by indirect immunofluorescent microscopy. Additional studies demonstrated that soluble purified laminin fully substituted for RA in this system to promote renal tubulogenesis when combined with TGF-beta 1 and EGF. These results demonstrate that the growth factors, TGF-beta 1 and EGF, and the retinoid, RA, promote tubulogenesis in adult renal proximal tubule cells in tissue culture in a manner reminiscent of inductive embryonic kidney morphogenesis. These observations define a coordinated interplay between growth factors and retinoids to induce pattern formation and morphogenesis. Furthermore, the demonstration of RA-induced laminin deposition as a critical event in this morphogenic process identifies laminin as a possible target protein for RA to act as a morphogen.

Animals↗

Embryonic heart induction.

We have characterized two signaling pathways that induce heart tissue during embryonic development. The first is initiated by the Wnt antagonist Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) and involves the homeodomain transcription factor Hex. Other Wnt antagonists are less effective and the potency of Dkk1 might be due to synergy between Wnt antagonizing and another, novel activity emanating from its amino terminal cysteine-rich domain. The second signal is initiated by Nodal and its co-receptor Cripto. Importantly, both the Dkk1/Wnt antagonism and Nodal pathways act on the endoderm that underlies the future heart to control secretion of diffusible factors that induce cardiogenesis in adjacent mesoderm. In this article, we summarize data that Dkk1 induces cardiogenic differentiation cell non-autonomously through the action of the homeodomain transcription factor Hex. We also discuss recent data showing that Nodal also acts indirectly through stimulation of the secreted protein Cerberus, which is a member of the differential-screening selected aberrant in neuroblastoma (DAN) family of secreted proteins. Finally, we present the model that signaling from Dkk1 regulates novel activities, in addition to Wnt antagonism, which are essential for progression beyond initiation of cardiogenesis to control later stages of cardiomyocyte differentiation and myocardial tissue organization.

Animals↗

Spemann's influence on Japanese developmental biology.

The discovery of the organizer by H. Spemann and Hilde Mangold, prompted a number of studies of embryonic induction in Japan. C.O. Whitman, N. Yatsu, T. Sato, H. Oka, T. Yamada, and Y.K. Okada were the pioneers in the field of embryonic induction. T. Yamada postulated the double potential theory for embryonic induction. O. Nakamura has modified the fate map of Vogt using newt and Xenopusblastulae. T.S. Okada and G. Eguchi proposed the new concept of "transdifferentiation" based on in vitro experiments in the retina and lens. T.S. Okada is not only an excellent scientist, but he has also nurtured many active developmental biologists. M. Takeichi, from his school, discovered the cell adhesion molecle, cadherin. Nakamura and colleagues tried to determine the origin and formation of the organizer. They performed recombination experiments using the ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm, and concluded that the phenomenon in which various mesoderm tissues are formed by the recombination of the presumptive ectoderm with endoderm was "regulation of the vegetal-animal gradient". Some groups have also tried to purify specific inducing factors. T. Yamada and colleagues isolated two different types of ribonucleoproteins. I. Kawakami and colleagues showed that the ribosome fraction has neural inducing capacity, and that the extracellular matrix contains mesodermal inducing factors. Finally Asashima and colleagues isolated and identified activin A as a MIF factor. This finding had a great influence not only in the field of developmental biology, but also in molecular biology. Using activin, Asashima's group has successfully generated various organs, tissues, trunk-tail and head structures in vitro using animal caps (undifferentiated cells). Some other important molecules such as BMP, chordin and bFGF are also being studied by young Japanese scientists.

Amphibians↗

Induction and the Turing-Child field in development.

The central problem in biological development is the understanding of epigenesis. The dominant theory of development in the last 80 years that also purports to explain epigenesis is induction theory. It suggests that development is driven by sequential inductions where each "induction" (in one sense of the word induction) is effected by the action of an inducing part of the embryo on a responding part of the embryo. The theory stems from Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) who transplanted a tissue from the dorsal blastopore lip of Triturus into the ventral ectoderm of another gastrula and thus initiated and "induced" (in another sense of the word induction) gastrulation and embryogenesis in the ventral side of the host that became a double embryo (siamese twins). We explain this induction, i.e. the formation of the double embryo, according to the Child theory and the Turing-Gierer-Meinhardt theory when it is also assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing activator and inhibitor, respectively. Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) also suggested that the ingressing mesoderm induces the overlying ectoderm to form the neural plate and neural tube. This 'neural induction', the 'primary embryonic induction', became the cornerstone of induction theory, i.e. of the sequential induction concept referred to above. But we argue that the metabolic gradients that precede and accompany neurulation, as obtained by Child, also for Triturus, arise through a Turing self-organization if it is assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens, and these gradients are the cause and primary event of neurulation. Thus there is no need to invoke the 'neural induction'. It is argued that fundamental events such as gastrulation and also organ formation are caused by the Turing-Child field and not by sequential induction. Similar principles, such as bud formation caused by a radial metabolic pattern that transforms to a longitudinal pattern, govern the formation, for example, of the mouth and the gut. The formation and localization of bottle cells is explained according to the Child-Turing field and modern biochemistry. The chemical metabolic pre-pattern precedes, and causes, morphogenesis and differentiation as envisaged by Turing. The Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) transplantation experiment when performed on a sea urchin duplicates not only the phenotype but also the metabolic (reduction) pattern. These experimental results, by Horstadius, predicted by Child, follow from the Turing-Gierer-Meinhardt theory if it is assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens. If the transplantation is performed not onto the whole sea urchin but onto only a part of it, that manifests only a part of the metabolic pattern, then from the part a phenotypic whole underlain by a normal and a whole metabolic pattern can be rescued. These experimental results of Horstadius follow from Turing theory if cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens. Understanding how to transform a part into a whole can be valuable in regenerative medicine. Unspecific induction of a secondary amphibian embryo is similar to the induction of posterior structures at the anterior pole of an insect, and the "double abdomen" (and Kalthoff's experimental results) of the midge Smittia resulting from UV irradiation of the anterior pole, can be explained by Meinhardt theory of unspecific induction if ATP is the Turing morphogen. When not working on regeneration, Child investigated intact living organisms and his observation method was not disruptive to normal development, whereas workers in induction theory work with pieces and in general disrupt normal development. We conclude that the Turing-Child field causes all development and explains epigenesis. Sequential induction does not explain epigenesis and does not exist in normal development. But induction in the sense of a transplantation leading to double embryo or rescuing a whole phenotype from a part is of interest.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗