SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DYSPEPSIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The subdivision of undiagnosed patients with dyspepsia into symptomatic subgroups (ulcerlike, dysmotilitylike, refluxlike, and nonspecific) may give a clue to the underlying cause; however, the value of this approach in practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms and combinations of these symptoms. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 820 outpatients (median age, 62 years; 47% male) completed, before endoscopy, a validated questionnaire that measured 46 gastrointestinal symptoms. RESULTS: Of patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 162), 17% had ulcerlike, 9% dysmotilitylike, and 16% refluxlike dyspepsia alone; 31% fell into two or more symptom subgroups; and 27% had nonspecific symptoms. A similar distribution of the dyspepsia subgroups was observed in patients without functional dyspepsia. Younger age, female gender, frequent upper abdominal pain, no (or sometimes) pain relief with antacid use, and infrequent vomiting were predictive of functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was 60%). The dyspepsia subgroups were poor discriminators in a separate model for functional dyspepsia vs. all other diagnoses (at a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was only 43%). CONCLUSIONS: The dyspepsia subgroups, as currently defined, appear to have little clinical utility and may be an inappropriate way of classifying dyspepsia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Comparing rates of dyspepsia with Coxibs vs NSAID+PPI: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Because dyspeptic symptoms are far more prevalent than ulcer complications in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), economic models indicate that dyspepsia rates (not ulcer complications) are the major determinant of cost-effectiveness in treating arthritis. We performed a meta-analysis to compare rates of dyspepsia for two common therapies in high-risk patients with arthritis: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (Coxib) alone and combination therapy with a nonselective NSAID and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (NSAID+PPI). METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify trials comparing either a Coxib versus NSAID or NSAID+PPI versus NSAID in chronic arthritis. We selected studies that report incident dyspepsia, defined a priori as "epigastric pain," "dyspepsia," and "nausea." We then performed meta-analysis to compare the relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction of dyspepsia for Coxib versus NSAID and NSAID+PPI versus NSAID. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 26 studies comparing dyspepsia between Coxibs and NSAIDs revealed a 12% relative risk reduction for Coxibs with an absolute risk reduction of 3.7%. Meta-analysis of four studies comparing dyspepsia between the NSAID+PPI combination and NSAIDs alone revealed a 66% relative risk reduction for NSAID+PPI with an absolute risk reduction of 9%. Compared with the NSAID strategy, the number needed to treat to prevent dyspepsia was 27 for Coxibs and 11 for NSAID+PPI. CONCLUSION: NSAID+PPI affords greater risk reduction for dyspepsia than Coxibs when compared with the common baseline of NSAIDs. Because there are limited head-to-head data comparing Coxibs versus NSAID+PPI, these data provide the best indirect evidence that NSAID+PPI may be superior to Coxibs in minimizing incident dyspepsia.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1998

Dyspepsia: how should we measure it?

This study developed and validated a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia. A questionnaire was administered to 126 patients with dyspepsia who presented for care at a VA outpatient clinic and a family physician's private office. Dyspepsia-specific health was measured by self-report using: (1) an existing dyspepsia scale that produces an aggregate score by summing ratings across pain and non-pain symptoms; (2) adaptations of two scales originally designed to measure back pain; and (3) a new scale measuring satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. Generic health was measured using the SF-36. Results from factor analysis revealed four dimensions of dyspepsia-related health: pain intensity, pain disability, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. After refinements, scales representing the four dimensions conformed to psychometric standards for reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The importance of measuring dyspepsia using a multidimensional approach was confirmed by demonstrating that classification of dyspepsia severity depended on the dimension that was assessed. We conclude that dyspepsia is best measured using a multidimensional approach.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Gender-related differences in dyspepsia: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Relative to men, women are diagnosed more frequently with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. With increased awareness of basic gender differences in perception and treatment of visceral pain, there has been new interest in research on gender disparity in the care of people with functional GI disorders. Past attention has focused on irritable bowel syndrome, whereas gender differences in other disorders are less well described. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to systematically review studies that have examined gender-related differences among patients with dyspepsia. METHODS: MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and PsycINFO databases were searched for English-language articles on dyspepsia published between 1966 and August 2001. Epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, review articles, and conceptual articles from peer-reviewed journals were included for review. Findings were summarized and discussed within a framework of biological and psychosocial factors. Statistical analysis of combined data was inappropriate because of the inconsistent definition of dyspepsia among different studies and wide variation in the types of articles reviewed. RESULTS: Studies that examine gender-related differences in patients with dyspepsia have focused their investigations on the clinical epidemiology and pathophysiology of dyspepsia. In most epidemiologic studies, no gender analysis was performed beyond a description of sample demographics, and when statistical significance was tested, few consistent gender differences were found. Overall, it appears that men and women with dyspepsia possibly differ with respect to pattern of symptoms, pain perception or modulation, and antinociceptive mechanisms, but these observations have not been confirmed. No study evaluated the clinical implications of these possible differences. CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts should be directed to not only examine gender-related differences in the clinical epidemiology of dyspepsia, but also understand their clinical significance. Therefore, well-designed population-based studies using a consistent definition of dyspepsia are needed to investigate the prevalence of dyspepsia symptoms and patterns of dyspepsia management among men and women.

Domestic Violence↗

PubMed2003

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia still represents an unsolved clinical enigma. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection are predictors of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia, and if H. pylori eradication improves symptoms in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: An observational study was performed on outpatients with uninvestigated dyspepsia. Symptoms were scored and H. pylori status determined. Patients with functional dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomly given either a standard eradicating treatment or a 1-month course of empirical treatment. The latter was also given to functional dyspeptic patients without infection. Symptoms were re-assessed in functional dyspeptic patients at 2- and 6-month follow-up visits. Patients receiving eradicating treatment were re-tested for H. pylori at the 2 month visit. RESULTS: A total of 860 patients were studied and 605 (70.3%) were affected by functional dyspepsia. H. pylori infection was diagnosed in 71.8% of patients with organic dyspepsia and in 65.0% with functional dyspepsia (p=0.053). Male sex, anaemia, smoking habit, age over 45 years, and severe epigastric pain, but not H. pylori infection, were independent predictors of organic disease. Symptoms significantly improved in most functional dyspeptic patients regardless of their H. pylori status and type of treatment. CONCLUSION: H. pylori infection is not a strong predictor of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia. H. pylori eradication is not essential to improve symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Dyspepsia and health care seeking in a community: How important are psychological factors?

The factors that drive subjects with dyspepsia in the community to seek medical care are uncertain. We aimed to identify whether psychological factors explain health care utilization among subjects with dyspepsia. A sample of residents of western Sydney selected randomly from the electoral rolls was mailed a validated self-report questionnaire. Dyspepsia was defined as pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. Potential predictors of physician visits tested included gastrointestinal symptoms, neuroticism (by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire), psychological morbidity (General Health Questionnaire), and sexual, physical, and emotional abuse (based on standardized criteria). Among 730 subjects, 13% (95% CI 10.3-15.2%) had dyspepsia and 70% (95% CI 59.8-79.5%) had sought medical care. Subjects with dyspepsia had significantly higher neuroticism and psychological morbidity scores and reported childhood emotional abuse more often than those without dyspepsia (all P < 0.05), but none of these were independent predictors. Male gender (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), greater pain severity (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.12-2.91, P < 0.01), and meeting the Rome criteria for irritable bowel (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.06-3.78) were associated with dyspepsia subjects seeing a physician or alternative therapist for abdominal pain or discomfort, explaining 32% of the deviance. Pain severity (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.58) and symptoms of five or more years duration (OR = 5.73, 95% CI 3.71-8.87) were predictive of dyspepsia subjects ever seeking care for abdominal pain or discomfort, explaining 15% of the deviance. Psychological factors were not significant predictors of seeking medical attention in dyspepsia. Health care seeking among community subjects with dyspepsia is explained in part by symptom severity and duration but not by neuroticism, psychological morbidity, or a history of abuse.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

The prevalence of dyspepsia and use of antisecretory medication in North Glasgow: role of Helicobacter pylori vs. lifestyle factors.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of dyspepsia and associated antisecretory medication usage, and their associations with H. pylori infection in the general population. In addition, to compare the importance of H. pylori infection relative to other potential causes of dyspepsia: alcohol, smoking and obesity. METHODS: The study examined a random population sample of 784 men and 827 women from Glasgow. They completed a validated dyspepsia questionnaire and had their H. pylori status determined by serology. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of dyspepsia was 12%; prescribed antisecretory medication had been used over the last 6 months by 7%. The odds ratio (95% CI) for dyspepsia, comparing H. pylori-positives to negatives was 1.79 (1.03, 3.09) for men and 1.11 (0.70, 1.78) for women. Ever-smoking (both sexes) and obesity (women) had higher odds ratios for dyspepsia than did H. pylori. Adjustment for age, social class, ever-smoking, ever-drinking and obesity reduced the H. pylori odds ratios for dyspepsia to 1.38 (0.73, 2.60) for men and 0.99 (0. 57, 1.73) for women. The association between H. pylori and antisecretory medication usage was similar to that for dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: Obesity and smoking are more important risk factors, for dyspepsia and antisecretory medication usage, than is H. pylori. Reducing the burden and cost of dyspepsia will require lifestyle modification and not merely H. pylori eradication.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome after a Salmonella gastroenteritis outbreak: one-year follow-up cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been reported that some patients develop functional digestive disorders, particularly irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), after acute gastroenteritis (AGE). However, the presence of dyspepsia has not been specifically addressed. We prospectively evaluated development of dyspepsia and IBS during a 1-year follow-up in a cohort of adult patients affected by a Salmonella enteritidis AGE outbreak. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1878 potential participants at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months; 677 had experienced a Salmonella enteritidis AGE on June 23, 2002, and 1201 had not (randomly selected controls, matched for village of residence, age, and sex). At 12 months, 271 patients and 335 controls returned the questionnaires. Data permitted the establishment of dyspepsia and IBS diagnosis by Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Before the AGE outbreak, the prevalence of dyspepsia was similar in cases and controls (2.5% vs 3.8%); the prevalence of IBS was also similar (2.9% vs 2.3%). At 3, 6, and 12 months, the prevalence of both dyspepsia and IBS had increased significantly in exposed compared with unexposed subjects. Overlap between dyspepsia and IBS was frequent. At 1 year, the relative risk for development of dyspepsia was 5.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-9.8) and for IBS was 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.1-19.7). Prolonged abdominal pain and vomiting during AGE were positive predictors of dyspepsia. No predictive factors for IBS were found. CONCLUSIONS: Salmonella gastroenteritis is a significant risk factor not only for IBS but also for dyspepsia; at 1 year of follow-up, 1 in 7 and 1 in 10 subjects developed dyspepsia or IBS, respectively.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Dyspepsia in children and adolescents: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia is poorly characterized in the pediatric population. The goal of the current study was to describe the clinical constellation and natural history of dyspepsia in children and adolescents seen in a pediatric gastroenterology practice. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was administered by a pediatric gastroenterologist to all subjects 5 or more years of age (and their parents or guardians) treated in a referral pediatric gastroenterology practice for 1 month or more of abdominal pain or discomfort, nausea, or vomiting. Subjects with dyspepsia and dyspepsia subtypes (ulcer-like, dysmotility-like) were identified by using previously defined adult criteria. Evaluation and treatment were performed at the discretion of the attending pediatric gastroenterologist. RESULTS: During a 1-year period, 257 patients were screened with 127 subjects fulfilling criteria for dyspepsia (59% girls, 85% white; median age, 11.7 years; median duration of symptoms, 8 months). Symptoms were ulcer-like in 26% and dysmotility-like (nausea predominance) in 15% of subjects. In those with dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux were noted in 24% and 43%, respectively. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsy were performed in 56 subjects with 21 (38%) having mucosal inflammation (Helicobacter pylori in 5). The remaining 35 subjects (62%) were considered to have functional dyspepsia. Duration of symptoms less than 1 year and vomiting were risk factors for mucosal inflammation. Follow-up at 6 months to 2 years revealed 70% of subjects were either asymptomatic or much improved regardless of the cause of dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: Most children and adolescents with dyspepsia do not have serious disease. In our referral population H. pylori infection was unusual, and no peptic ulceration was found. Most subjects with functional dyspepsia have improvement of symptoms over time.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Irritable bowel syndrome in patients with dyspepsia: a community-based study in southern Europe.

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) share aetiopathogenic factors, and may therefore be part of a single disorder. This study was intended to determine their prevalence in the general population, and the degree of overlap between these two digestive disorders. DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: A sample of 264 subjects chosen randomly from the population census of a city in Spain, and considered representative of the general population in this city, was surveyed by questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of dyspepsia was 23.9%, and that of IBS was 13.6%. Of the subjects with dyspepsia, 31.6% had IBS, and of the subjects with IBS, 55.6% reported symptoms of dyspepsia. The prevalence of IBS was higher among subjects with dyspepsia (31.7%) than among those who reported no symptoms of dyspepsia (7.9%; P < 0.05). Moreover, the prevalence of IBS was similar in three subgroups identified according to the type of dyspepsia described (ulcer-like, reflux-like or dysmotility-like). When we compared subjects with both dyspepsia and IBS and those with dyspepsia alone, we found no significant differences in clinical characteristics except for abdominal pain and fear of cancer, which were more frequent in the former. Of the entire sample, 27.7% of the subjects sought medical attention for IBS and 17% missed work because of IBS. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that functional dyspepsia and IBS are two manifestations of a single, more extensive digestive system disorder.

Colonic Diseases, Functional↗

PubMed2006

Endoscopy has minimal impact on mortality from upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients older than 55 years with uncomplicated dyspepsia.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of endoscopy to detect curable upper gastrointestinal malignancy in patients older than 55 years presenting with uncomplicated dyspepsia. METHODS: A cohort study was performed in North Glasgow Health Trust. One hundred and thirty-one patients older than 55 years of age, diagnosed to have upper gastrointestinal cancer within the North Glasgow Trust between January 1995 and December 1997, identified by the West of Scotland Cancer Registry were included. The main outcome measures were the proportion of upper gastrointestinal cancers that present in patients older than 55 years with uncomplicated dyspepsia, and the proportion of patients that presented with uncomplicated dyspepsia who have curable upper gastrointestinal cancer. RESULTS: Of the 131 cancer cases identified, only 30 (23%) had dyspepsia (complicated or uncomplicated) as their predominant symptom and only eight (6%) patients presented with uncomplicated dyspepsia. Of those eight patients presenting with uncomplicated dyspepsia and found to have upper gastrointestinal cancer, six were found to have lymph node metastases and/or extensive metastases at the time of diagnosis. Each of these six patients died from their cancer within 39 months of diagnosis. Of the two patients presenting with uncomplicated dyspepsia without evidence of lymph node spread, one died 55 days after diagnosis. Only one patient presenting with uncomplicated dyspepsia and found to have cancer remains alive at 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 131 patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal cancer, only eight presented with uncomplicated dyspepsia and only one of these was cured. Consequently a policy of endoscoping patients older than 55 years with uncomplicated dyspepsia will reduce death from upper gastrointestinal cancers by less than 1% in our population.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Review article: the overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome -- a tale of one or two disorders?

Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome are currently considered to be two separate nosological entities. However, the overlap of symptoms and the evidence of a number of common pathophysiological characteristics suggest that functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome may be different presentations of the same disorder. In this review, we critically appraise points in common, as well as differences, in the epidemiology, pathophysiology and response to treatment of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Population-based studies and large case series show that one- to two-thirds of subjects with irritable bowel syndrome have symptoms that overlap with functional dyspepsia. Symptom analyses have generally failed to support functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome as separate entities. An exaggerated motor response to meals, delayed gastric emptying and abnormal small bowel and colonic transit can all be found in subsets of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, and are not exclusive to either condition. Visceral hypersensitivity is a common feature to both entities and seems unlikely to be site or disease specific. There is good evidence for the post-infectious development of irritable bowel syndrome, and this may also apply in functional dyspepsia. Psychiatric comorbidities are similar in functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Several common drug classes (prokinetics, visceral analgesics, psychoactive agents) may similarly improve both functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms. The evidence available suggests that at least subsets of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome represent different manifestations of a single entity. The identification of common pathophysiological targets for therapy should be pursued in future research.

Dyspepsia↗

PubMed2005

Comprehension and awareness of symptoms in women with dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Overlapping symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia are a problem for physicians and patients. AIM: This study explored comprehension of dyspepsia symptoms and associated medical terminology among women with symptoms of dyspepsia. METHODS: The US women aged > or = 18 years with dyspepsia (defined by Rome II criteria) were recruited in two phases, via direct mail, the Internet, clinical investigators and/or gastroenterologists. In phase I, subjects took part in an hour-long telephonic interview comprising open-ended questions relating to symptom frequency/duration, triggers/patterns and severity. During phase II, subjects took part in a 45-min telephonic interview, which explored their understanding of dyspepsia symptoms and their predominant or most bothersome symptom. RESULTS: Subjects with 'pure' dyspepsia (without overlapping symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or irritable bowel syndrome) were sought, but of 777 subjects screened, most were excluded because of gastrointestinal comorbidities (irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). Only 85 (11%) subjects had 'pure' dyspepsia of whom 11 withdrew. Of the 74 subjects interviewed, 70% were unfamiliar with the term 'dyspepsia'. Subjects reported several symptoms, including bloating (65%), gas (50%), nausea (41%) and discomfort (36%). Most subjects could distinguish between symptom bothersomeness and severity, and between pain and discomfort. Terms such as 'satisfactory relief', 'central upper abdominal discomfort', 'early satiety' and 'postmeal fullness' were often misunderstood. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with 'pure' dyspepsia are rare, because of comorbidities. Dyspepsia-related terminology is often misunderstood by subjects.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia in a multiethnic population in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of functional dyspepsia (FD) in the general population is not known. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of FD and its risk factors in a multiethnic volunteer sample of the U.S. population. METHODS: One thousand employees at the Houston VA Medical Center were targeted with a symptom questionnaire asking about upper abdominal symptoms, followed by a request to undergo endsocopy. Dyspepsia was defined by the presence of epigastric pain, fullness, nausea, or vomiting, and FD was defined as dyspepsia in the absence of esophageal erosions, gastric ulcers, or duodenal ulcers or erosions. The presence of dyspepsia and FD was examined in multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 465 employees completed the relevant questions and of those 203 had endoscopic examination. The age-adjusted prevalence rate of dyspepsia was 31.9 per 100 (95% CI: 26.7-37.1), and 15.8 per 100 (95% CI: 9.6-22.0) if participants with concomitant heartburn or acid regurgitation were excluded. Subjects with dyspepsia were more likely to report smoking, using antacids, aspirin or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and consulting a physician for their symptoms (p < 0.05) than participants without dyspepsia. Most (64.5%) participants with dyspepsia who underwent endoscopy had FD. The age-adjusted prevalence rate of FD was 29.2 per 100 (95% CI: 21.9-36.5), and 15.0 per 100 (6.7-23.3) if subjects with GERD were excluded. Apart from a trend towards association with older age in the multiple regression analysis, there were no significant predictors of FD among participants with dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with dyspepsia have FD. The prevalence of FD is high but predictors of FD remain poorly defined.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Prevalences of endoscopic and histological findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between dyspeptic symptoms and endoscopic and histological diagnoses. DESIGN: Cross sectional study of people with dyspepsia and controls matched for age and sex identified by questionnaire survey of all inhabitants aged 20 to 69. Endoscopy and histological examination was performed with the examiner blind to whether or not the patient had dyspepsia. SETTING: Population based survey in Sørreisa, Norway. SUBJECTS: All people with dyspepsia and age and sex matched people without dyspepsia were offered endoscopy. A total of 309 people with dyspepsia and 310 without dyspepsia underwent endoscopy, giving 273 matched pairs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalences of endoscopic and histological diagnoses made according to internationally accepted standards. RESULTS: In all, 1802 of 2027 (88.9%) people returned the questionnaire. Of the 163 subjects who refused endoscopy, 114 were controls. Of five endoscopic and four histological diagnoses only peptic ulcer disease, endoscopic duodenitis, and active chronic gastritis were diagnosed significantly more often in people with dyspepsia. In all, 30% to 50% of the diagnoses of mucosal inflammation and peptic ulcer disease were made among subjects without dyspepsia, and only 10% of both those with and those without dyspepsia had normal endoscopic findings. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic findings, with possible exceptions of peptic ulcer disease and endoscopic duodenitis, showed no association of clinical value with dyspeptic symptoms. The small number of "normal" endoscopic findings in both those with and those without dyspepsia challenge well accepted endoscopic and histological diagnostic criteria with relation to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Evidence for hypomotility in non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prospective multifactorial study.

A prospective multifactorial study of symptoms and disturbance of gastrointestinal function has been undertaken in 50 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Objective tests including solid meal gastric emptying studies, gastric acid secretion, E-HIDA scintiscan for enterogastric bile reflux, and hydrogen breath studies were carried out in all patients and validated against control data. Gastroscopy and biopsy were carried out in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients only. Non-ulcer dyspepsia patients were categorised on the basis of predominant symptoms as: dysmotility-like dyspepsia (n = 22); essential dyspepsia (n = 14), gastro-oesophageal reflux-like dyspepsia (n = 11); and ulcer-like dyspepsia (n = 3). In the total non-ulcer dyspepsia population, solid meal gastric emptying was delayed (T50 mean (SEM) = 102 (6) minutes (patients) v 64 (6) minutes (controls), (p less than 0.01) and high incidences of gastritis (n = 26) and Helicobacter pyloridis infection (n = 18) were found. An inverse correlation was observed between solid meal gastric emptying and fasting peak acid output (r = -0.4; p less than 0.01). Indeed gastric emptying was particularly prolonged in eight patients (T50 mean (SEM) = 139 (15) minutes) with hypochlorhydria. In the non-ulcer dyspepsia population oral to caecal transit time of a solid meal was delayed (mean SEM = 302 (14) minutes (patients) v 244 (12) minutes (controls) (p less than 0.01]. Seven patients had a dual peak of breath hydrogen suggestive of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. No association was observed between symptoms and any of the objective abnormalities. This multifactorial study has shown that hypomotility, including gastroparesis and delayed small bowel transit, is common in non-ulcer dyspepsia and may be related to other disorders of gastrointestinal function. No relation between symptoms and disorders of function, however, has been shown.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Consultations and referrals for dyspepsia in general practice--a one year database survey.

OBJECTIVE: Dyspepsia usually presents first in primary care. There are many reasons for referral including urgent problems (for example, haematemesis and melaena), treatment failure, or to exclude serious pathology. Referral will change the population characteristics of primary and secondary care dyspeptics. Many of the guidelines for primary care dyspepsia, however, are based on secondary care research on these referred patients. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of dyspepsia in general practice, the characteristics of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care, and the clinical and non-clinical determinants of referral in these patients. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of the consultation records of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care during a one year period. METHODS: Dyspeptic patients who consulted their general practitioner (GP) in 1997 were selected on the basis of International Classification of Primary Care codes using a computer search among 20 sentinel practices affiliated with the Utrecht Network of General Practitioners. Cross tables and logistic regression analysis were carried out to reveal patient characteristics and determinants of referral. RESULTS: The prevalence of dyspepsia presenting in primary care in 1997 was 3.4% (1740/48958). These patients were usually not referred during the first consultation. Men, elderly patients, and patients with a previous history of dyspepsia were referred to secondary care more frequently than other dyspeptic patients. Patients diagnosed with both irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia were at risk of being referred most. CONCLUSION: Dyspepsia is a frequently occurring complaint in primary care and patients are usually treated by their GP. Besides clinically relevant reasons for referral, dyspeptic patients with irritable bowel syndrome seem to be more "at risk" of being referred to secondary care than other dyspeptic patients. The differences between primary and secondary care dyspeptic patients should be taken into account when interpreting research for guideline purposes. Further research is needed to clarify the background of the relation between irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia and its influence on referral.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

New developments in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Functional dyspepsia is a clinical syndrome defined by chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort in the upper abdomen of unknown origin. Although generally accepted, investigators differently interpret this definition and clinical trials are often biased by inhomogeneous inclusion criteria. The poorly defined multifactorial pathogenesis of dyspeptic symptoms has hampered efforts to develop effective treatments. A general agreement exists on the irrelevant role played by Helicobacter pylori in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. Gastric acid secretion is within normal limits in patients with functional dyspepsia but acid related symptoms may arise in a subgroup of them. Proton pump inhibitors appear to be effective in this subset of patients with dyspepsia. Non-painful dyspeptic symptoms are suggestive of underlying gastrointestinal motor disorders and such abnormalities can be demonstrated in a substantial proportion of patients. Postprandial fullness and vomiting have been associated with delayed gastric emptying of solids, and early satiety and weight loss to postcibal impaired accommodation of the gastric fundus. Prokinetics have been shown to exert beneficial effects, at least in some patients with dyspepsia. In contrast, drugs enhancing gastric fundus relaxation have been reported to improve symptoms, although conflicting results have also been published. An overdistended antrum may also generate symptoms, but its potential pathogenetic role and the effects of drugs on this abnormality have never been investigated formally. Visceral hypersensitivity plays a role in some dyspeptic patients and this abnormality is also a potential target for treatment. Both chemo- and mechanoreceptors can trigger hyperalgesic responses. Psychosocial abnormalities have been consistently found in functional digestive syndromes, including dyspepsia. Although useful in patients with irritable bowel syndromes (IBS), antidepressants have been only marginally explored in functional dyspepsia. Among the new potentially useful agents for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor agonists have been shown to exert a prokinetic effect. Unlike motilides, 5-HT(4) receptor agonists do not appear to increase the gastric fundus tone and this may contribute to improve symptoms. 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists have been investigated mainly in the IBS and the few studies performed in functional dyspepsia have provided conflicting results. Also, kappa-opioid receptor agonists might be useful for functional digestive syndromes because of their antinociceptive effects, but available results in functional dyspepsia are scanty and inconclusive. Other receptors that represent potential clinical targets for antagonists include purinoceptors (i. e., P2X2/3 receptors), NMDA receptors (NR2B subtype), protease-activated receptor-2, the vanilloid receptor-1, tachykinin receptors (NK(1)/NK(2)) and cholecystokinin (CCK)(1) receptors.

Dyspepsia↗