Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Barrier Methods”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Long-term use of the female condom among couples at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured female condom use for more than a 6-month period or among persons at high risk of STD. OBJECTIVE: To measure long-term use of the female condom among couples at high risk of HIV infection and to evaluate the effect of female condom use on unprotected coital acts. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-nine Zambian couples with symptomatic sexually transmitted diseases (STD) received female condoms, male condoms, and spermicides and were counseled to use either condom plus spermicide for each coital act. Couples were followed up at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits. Barrier contraceptive use was measured prospectively by coital log. RESULTS: Among the 99 couples enrolled, 51, 38, and 30 couples were successfully followed up for 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Female condoms were reportedly used in 24%, 27%, and 23% of coital acts and by 86%, 79%, and 67% of the returning couples during each time interval. Higher-level female condom users used male condoms less often but had fewer unprotected coital acts (5% vs. 14%; p < 0.05) than lower-level female condom users. CONCLUSION: A majority of couples at high risk of HIV infection used the female condom in conjunction with other barrier methods over a 1-year period. The addition of female condoms accompanied by appropriate counseling to the barrier method mix may reduce unprotected sex among couples at high-risk of HIV infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Sexual behavior of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time.

For 10 years, a prospective study has been taking place in Germany to examine the use of natural family planning (NFP). As natural methods are behavioral methods, use-effectiveness, acceptability and continuation rates are very much influenced by patterns of sexual behavior. Therefore we performed an analysis of the sexual behavior of NFP users. Out of the data base of 1211 clients and 12,591 cycles we could identify a group of 300 women, all NFP beginners, with 5900 contraceptive cycles, who contributed at least 12 cycles with reliable recording of their sexual activity. Different groups were analyzed with methods of analysis of variance and regression models to find out significant differences in their sexual behavior with respect to sociodemographic structure and time of use. Nearly half of all the women systematically combine the fertility awareness part of NFP with other family planning methods. They use barriers in more than 60% of their cycles. The other half never or only in about 7% of their cycles use additional barrier methods. The latter show a clear decrease in barrier use in the course of time, whereas the frequent barrier users constantly combine the advantages of two family planning methods. Regarding the frequency of intercourse they are the sexually more active ones and show distinct sociodemographic characteristics. We could confirm the existence of three groups of NFP users, which differ significantly in their use of NFP as a family planning method. Despite these differences the low pregnancy rates indicate the conscious and risk-related sexual behavior of the group members.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

Prevalence of gonorrhoea among women using various methods of contraception.

Among 2,005 women attending a contraceptive clinic 9-3 per cent. were found to have gonorrhoea. When these women were classified according to the method of contraception used at the time of their initial visit to the clinic, the following prevalence of gonorrhoea was observed: oral contraceptives 11-5 per cent., intrauterine contraceptive devices 9-9 per cent., barrier methods (condom-diaphragm-foam) 4-2 per cent. These differences are statistically significant. The authors suggest that the additional protective advantage of barrier methods should be considered when the physician and patient are selecting appropriate methods of contraception.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A study of the vaginal contraceptive sponge used with and without the fertility awareness method.

The actual effectiveness rates of natural and barrier methods of family planning are lower than the theoretical ones. If couples accurately defined the limits of the fertile phase and used barriers at that time, then actual effectiveness might increase. A randomized, controlled clinical trial was initiated to determine the effectiveness of the contraceptive sponge used only during the fertile time and to compare this with sponge use at every intercourse. Recruitment problems and discontinuation forced the early termination of this study, but qualitative information about compliance and acceptability was collected. Common sponge problems were reported as were misuses of the sponge, but problems and misuse were not related. Determination of the fertile phase was reportedly easy, but complaints of and discontinuation for inconvenience occurred. For unplanned pregnancies, contraceptive behaviors around the time of conception are presented.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Differences in contraceptive methods used by women with physical disabilities compared to women without disabilities.

Women with physical disabilities face unique challenges often not addressed by gynecologists regarding choices of contraceptive method. Interactions between some hormonal methods of contraception and disability-related medications, inability to use barrier methods because of limitations in manual dexterity, potentially elevated risk for DVT, and need for menstrual management are factors that complicate decisions about contraceptive methods for this growing population.Objective: This study assessed similarities and differences in the use of and satisfaction with different methods of birth control between women with disabilities and women without disabilities, while controlling for age at onset and severity of disability.Methods: As part of a national survey, 616 women of childbearing age (315 with a variety of physical disabilities, 301 without disabilities) reported their use of and satisfaction with various forms of contraception.Results: Women with physical disabilities were significantly less likely than women without disabilities to use hormonal (11.7%/19.6%) or barrier methods (11.1%/17.6). They were significantly more likely to have had a hysterectomy (8.9%/4.3%) or use no method (41.9%/33.4%). There were no significant differences in the use of surgical methods (22.9%/22.6%) or natural methods (3.5%/2.7%). Women with more severe disabilities were significantly more likely to have had hysterectomies or use surgical or no method of contraception. Women with disabilities were least satisfied with barrier methods.Conclusion: Women with disabilities are more likely to use permanent methods or no method of contraception. Further research is needed to understand the impact of functional limitations and other disability-related factors on the use of other contraceptive methods in this population.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Hormonal and barrier contraception and risk of upper genital tract disease in the PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) study.

OBJECTIVE: Among women diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease, we examined the associations between hormonal or barrier methods of contraception and upper genital tract infection or inflammation. METHODS: Participants were 563 patients from a treatment trial for pelvic inflammatory disease. All had pelvic pain; pelvic organ tenderness; and leukorrhea, mucopurulent cervicitis, or untreated cervicitis. Contraceptive use within the prior 4 weeks was compared among women with baseline upper genital tract gonorrhea or chlamydia, women with endometritis without upper genital tract gonorrhea or chlamydia, and women with neither upper genital tract gonorrhea or chlamydia nor endometritis. RESULTS: Inconsistent condom use was significantly and independently associated with a 2 to 3 times elevated risk for upper genital tract infection. Upper genital tract gonorrhea or chlamydia was not significantly associated with use of oral contraceptives, use of medroxyprogesterone, condoms used consistently, nor other barrier methods. CONCLUSION: No hormonal or barrier contraceptive method was related to a reduction in upper genital tract disease among women with clinical pelvic inflammatory diseases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Acceptability of female condom use among women exchanging street sex in New York City.

Greater access to alternative female-initiated barrier methods, such as the female condom, is needed among women exchanging street sex. This study describes knowledge of and experience with the female condom among 101 women exchanging sex for money and drugs on the streets of New York City, and examines the acceptability of female condom use as an alternative barrier method for HIV/STD prevention among this population. Female condom use among this sample of sex workers was found to be related to having a regular sexual partner, living with someone who is a drug or alcohol abuser, not being homeless, using alcohol or intravenous heroin, having heard of the device, and having discussed the device with other women or with a regular sexual partner. Despite decreased acceptability post-use, most sex workers indicated an intention for future female condom use.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Collagen sponge as vaginal contraceptive barrier: critical summary of seven years of research.

Extensive testing of collagen sponge as a vaginal contraceptive (mechanical and chemical) showed that the original expectations regarding the safety, convenience, and efficacy were not met. The collagen sponge was tested both as a cylinder and as a diaphragm and used as such or impregnated with spermicidal detergent or with zinc salt. The collagen sponge must be larger than 6 cm in diameter in order to serve as a mechanical barrier that will not be dislodged during physical activity. This creates problems with the ease of insertion and with the partners' awareness of the barrier. When the collagen sponge containing ejaculate is left in the vagina greater than 48 hours, it develops an offensive odor. The original acidity of the collagen sponge (pH 3.5, 0.1 mol/L) is soon neutralized by the large volume of alkaline vaginal secretions. In vitro studies showed that up to 10 mg of nonoxynol 9 per milliliter of growth medium did not inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus. These effects, as well as the large surface area of the resilient sponge, present a potential risk for growing staphylococci within the collagen sponge. The capacity of the collagen sponge to absorb a large volume of cervical and vaginal fluid produced two symptoms that were annoying to the volunteers: an awareness of either vaginal dryness during intercourse or, conversely, saturation of the sponge from the vagina. Postcoital studies showed viable spermatozoa in the cervical mucus in 25% of the tests with the nonmedicated cylindrical sponge but in only 6% of tests with the sponge containing nonoxynol 9. The results of clinical trials conducted at four centers support the view that collagen sponge as a vaginal contraceptive barrier method is inconvenient to both partners, not effective enough to compete with present methods of vaginal contraception, and possibly might be unsafe because of the capacity to grow bacteria. Despite the negative end result of this goal-oriented research, we believe that our studies have contributed to a better understanding of vaginal physiologic features, the safety and effectiveness of spermicidal detergents, and the mechanisms of vaginal malodor. Although the acceptability study showed some advantages of the collagen sponge over the rubber diaphragm, the overall acceptability of the collagen sponge diaphragm was no better than that of the rubber diaphragm. For all these reasons, including the possible risk of an increased incidence of toxic shock syndrome, we have discontinued further testing of either type of collagen sponge as a vaginal barrier method.

Collagen↗
PubMed1996

Contraceptive practice and attitudes in Sweden 1994.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate current contraceptive practice in Sweden and Swedish women's attitudes towards various contraceptive methods. METHODS: In 1994, a random sample of Swedish women (n = 2330), aged 15-45 years (stratified according to age and geographic distribution), were invited by telephone to participate in the study. Women (n = 1788) who accepted the invitation to participate were sent a postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 1422 women (overall response rate: 61.0%). The sample was somewhat skewed towards higher educational level, but in other demographic respects no great deviations from the parent population were observed. The distribution of contraceptive methods in fertile, sexually active women who wished to avoid pregnancy was as follows: oral contraceptives (OCs) 33%, OC plus barrier method 5%, intrauterine device 21%, barrier methods 23%, sterilization 5% (female 3%; male 2%) and injectable steroids 2%. The overall pattern of contraceptive use in women aged 15-45 years had changed very little compared to results of a similar survey performed in 1987. However, the use of less effective methods (periodic abstinence, coitus interruptus and no method grouped together) was considerably lower among teenagers in 1994 (3%) than in 1987 (18%). The use of these traditional methods was still high in women aged over 35 years (15-17%). A large number of women considered medical methods of contraception to be reliable and easy to use but many were concerned about the safety for health of medical methods. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive practice changed towards more frequent use of medical, effective methods among young Swedish women, but not in the total female population. The latter was among others related to the relatively high use rates of less effective methods among women aged over 35. Women were concerned about the health safety of medical methods and relatively low percentages of women reported having received advice from health care professionals to use effective methods.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The cervical cap.

The Prentif cavity rim (PCR) cervical cap offers American women a barrier method alternative that is safe, effective, and convenient. Despite its many advantages and benefits, disadvantages have been documented. These include limited availability and side effects, such as cap dislodgement, partner discomfort, and bad odor of the cervical cap. However, many women decide the benefits and advantages associated with the PCR cervical cap outweigh the risks and possible side effects, making it an appealing alternative.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Preventing the heterosexual spread of AIDS: what is the best advice if compliance is taken into account?

It has been recently advocated that avoiding partners who may be at high risk of carrying HIV provides 5000-fold better protection against HIV infection than usage of condoms [1]. In this paper, it is demonstrated that this guideline is largely based on unrealistic assumptions. If the sensitivity of identifying high-risk partners, realistic estimates of the efficiency of mechanical and chemical barrier methods, and the compliance in following either strategy are taken into account, use of condoms and/or suppositories containing nonoxynol-9 might be more effective than the attempt to avoid high-risk partners. Thus, both barrier methods should be strongly recommended for casual sexual heterosexual contacts.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2002

Predictors of difficulty inserting the female condom.

This article describes the frequency of initial difficulty inserting the female condom and identifies predictors of insertion difficulty among women at risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Female STD clinic patients (n = 1144) were taught how to insert the female condom by using an anatomic model, then given an opportunity for self-insertion practice. Correct placement of the condom was verified by a nurse clinician, and the number of attempts required for correct insertion was recorded. Sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of refusing the insertion practice and of difficulty inserting the female condom were evaluated using logistic regression. Only 5% of study participants refused the self-insertion practice. Women who never had a Papanicolaou smear test, did not use tampons, never used an inserted method of STD prevention/birth control, and disliked the insertion features of intravaginal barrier methods were more likely to refuse the self-insertion practice. Of those who attempted self-insertion, 25% were unable to insert the female condom correctly on the first attempt. Women who never expressed their sexual likes and were indifferent to the positive features of intravaginal contraceptive methods were more likely to experience difficulty their first insertion attempt. Other variables associated with insertion difficulty included longer fingernails. Insertion refusal and difficulty affect use of the female condom for a sizable proportion of women. Women in this study who refused the self-insertion practice had greater aversion to inserting intravaginal barrier methods. Women who had initial difficulty inserting the female condom had a different profile from those who refused and can benefit from intensive skills training that includes supervised self-insertion practice.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1982

Fertility following discontinuation of different methods of fertility control.

The possibility of permanent sterility following use of modern contraceptive agents is a concept which causes great concern amongst members of the lay public. However, a thorough review of the literature gives a great deal of reassurance on this topic. The combined oral contraceptive pill causes slight delay, and the injectable contraceptives a moderate delay in the return of fertility following discontinuation, but there is no evidence of a greater likelihood of permanent infertility than in the normal population. The progestogen-only minipill should be risk-free, but final data are lacking. Epidemiological studies do not indicate an increased risk of infertility following IUD use, but it seems likely that there must be a very small number of IUD users who develop permanent infective damage to the Fallopian tubes. Barrier methods and periodic abstinence probably do not have any significant effect on subsequent fertility. Barrier methods could be protective. Therapeutic abortion may have a small deleterious effect on long-term reproductive success, but the data are inconclusive. Detailed information on fertility following use of other methods is not available.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1989

Contraception in Sweden.

In 1987, a survey of contraceptive use, knowledge and attitudes was conducted in Sweden by the International Health Foundation (IHF) as part of a multi-country study that has so far involved six other countries in Europe. The women involved, who were aged 15-44, completed a standard questionnaire. The overall percentage use of contraceptive methods, especially the reliable ones, was found to be high (95%). Oral contraception was the most frequently used method, followed by barrier methods and the intrauterine device (IUD). Contraceptive methods were chosen or abandoned mainly because of health reasons and better reliability. Knowledge of fertility proved to be generally good. Medical methods such as oral contraceptives and IUDs were associated with health hazards. In the case of the pill, fears of cardiovascular risks, thrombosis and cancer were widespread, while infection risk and menorrhagia were the most frequently quoted perceived disadvantages of the IUD. Indeed, these two methods suffer from a very negative image among Swedish users.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Advances in contraception.

Many safe and effective contraceptive methods are currently available, and a stream of new products is being introduced to the market. This article presents the histories, descriptions, and future trends for oral contraceptive pills, hormonal implants and injections, and intrauterine devices. Other methods discussed include barrier methods, spermicides, and emergency contraception, and permanent sterilization.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Contraceptive status and sexual function of climacteric Chinese women.

The objective of the present survey was to assess the contraceptive status and sexual function of climacteric Chinese women. One cross-sectional study randomly recruited 742 premenopausal, perimenopausal, and naturally menopausal women aged 45-55 years from Beijing. Contraceptive methods were used by 75.6% of premenopausal and 54.2% of perimenopausal women. The primary methods were the IUD and barrier method. The women's choices of methods were related to parity and frequency of sexual activities. Sexual activity was related to the satisfaction of contraceptive methods. Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women were about half as likely to enjoy sexual activity and to experience orgasms than premenopausal women. Women of higher socioeconomic status had a lower risk for decreased sexual functioning. The IUD was the most popular and the most appropriate contraceptive method for perimenopausal women. Sexual function was associated with the women's satisfaction with the contraceptive method used, their menopausal status, and their socioeconomic class.

China↗
PubMed1999

Prospective study of barrier contraception for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases: study design and general characteristics of the study group.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The AIDS epidemic has brought barrier contraceptives to the forefront of public health research. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of barrier contraceptive use in preventing sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including AIDS, is necessary to inform both potential users and public health policy makers. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of condoms and vaginal spermicide products, used alone or in combination, in preventing gonorrhea and chlamydia among women attending an STD clinic. GOAL OF THIS STUDY: To describe the general characteristics of the study group and its follow-up experience. STUDY DESIGN: Women who met the eligibility criteria were invited to participate. The initial visit included an interview, a behavioral intervention promoting barrier methods, a physical examination, and instructions to complete a sexual diary. Participants received free barrier contraceptives and returned for six monthly follow-up visits. DESIGN RESULTS: Participants (n = 1,122) were low income, single (74%) black (89%) women with a median age of 24. The behavioral intervention led to the use of barrier protection in more than 70% of reported acts of vaginal intercourse. Barriers were used consistently (100% of sexual acts) during 51% of the months of follow-up. A total of 148 cases of gonorrhea (28 per 1,000 months) and 122 cases of chlamydia infection (23 cases per 1,000 months) were diagnosed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents a practical solution to a complex set of design considerations. The study protocol was successful in promoting consistent and proper use of barrier methods.

Adult↗