Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Azithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Steady-state plasma and bronchopulmonary concentrations of intravenous levofloxacin and azithromycin in healthy adults.

The purpose of this study was to compare the concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in steady-state plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) after intravenous administration. Thirty-six healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects were randomized to either intravenous levofloxacin (500 or 750 mg) or azithromycin (500 mg) once daily for five doses. Venipuncture and bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage were performed in each subject at either 4, 12, or 24 h after the start of the last antibiotic infusion. The mean concentrations of levofloxacin and azithromycin in plasma were similar to those previously published. The dosing regimens of levofloxacin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in steady-state plasma than azithromycin during the 24 h after drug administration. The respective mean (+/- standard deviation) concentrations at 4, 12, and 24 h in ELF for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 11.01 +/- 4.52, 2.50 +/- 0.97, and 1.24 +/- 0.55 micro g/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 12.94 +/- 1.21, 6.04 +/- 0.39, and 1.73 +/- 0.78 micro g/ml; and those for azithromycin were 1.70 +/- 0.74, 1.27 +/- 0.47, and 2.86 +/- 1.75 micro g/ml. The differences in concentrations in ELF among the two levofloxacin groups and azithromycin were significantly (P < 0.05) higher at the 4- and 12-h sampling times. The respective concentrations in AM for 500 mg of levofloxacin were 83.9 +/- 53.2, 18.3 +/- 6.7, and 5.6 +/- 3.2 micro g/ml; those for 750 mg of levofloxacin were 81.7 +/- 37.0, 78.2 +/- 55.4, and 13.3 +/- 6.5 micro g/ml; and those for azithromycin were 650 +/- 259, 669 +/- 311, and 734 +/- 770 micro g/ml. Azithromycin achieved significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations in AM than levofloxacin at all sampling times. The concentrations in ELF and AM following intravenous administration of levofloxacin and azithromycin were higher than concentrations in plasma. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of such high intrapulmonary concentrations in patients with respiratory tract infections.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus 7-day treatment with tobramycin 0.3% for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis: multicentre, randomised and controlled trial in adults and children.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of Azyter, azithromycin 1.5% eye drops, for 3 days with tobramycin 0.3% for 7 days to treat purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, investigator-masked study including 1043 children and adults with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. Patients received either azithromycin 1.5% twice-daily for 3 days or tobramycin 0.3%, 1 drop every two hours for 2 days, then four times daily for 5 days. Clinical signs were evaluated and cultures obtained at D0, D3 and D9 (where D refers to "day"). Primary variable was the clinical cure at the Test-of-Cure (TOC)-visit (D9+/-1), for patients with D0-positive cultures. The cure was defined as: bulbar conjunctival injection and discharge scores of 0. RESULTS: Among 471 patients with D0-positivity in the per protocol set, 87.8% of the azithromycin 1.5% group and 89.4% of the tobramycin group were clinically cured at the TOC-visit. Azithromycin was non-inferior to tobramycin for clinical and bacteriological cure. Clinical cure was significantly higher with azithromycin 1.5% at D3. The safety profile of azithromycin was satisfactory with a good patient and investigator's acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin 1.5% for 3 days was as effective and as safe as tobramycin for 7 days. Furthermore, more azithromycin than tobramycin patients presented an early clinical cure at Day 3. Due to its twice daily dosing regimen for 3 days, azithromycin represents a step forward in the management of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis, especially in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

We compared the clinical and microbiological efficacy of dirithromycin with that of azithromycin in outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis who could be graded into stage III according to Ball's system of stratification. A total of 80 patients was studied. Of these, 40 were treated with dirithromycin as a once-daily dose of 500 mg for 5 days, and 40 with azithromycin as a once-daily dose of 500 mg for 3 days. At post-therapy, treatment success (cure or improvement) was achieved in 36 out of 40 (90%) patients receiving dirithromycin compared with 37 out of 40 (92.5%) in the azithromycin group. At the late post-therapy visit, 34 out of 36 (94.4%) dirithromycin-treated patients were cured as were 33 of 37 (89.2%) azithromycin-treated patients. A small proportion of patients treated with dirithromycin (10%) or with azithromycin (12.5%) suffered mild side effects. Gastrointestinal disorders, including abdominal cramps, nausea, or diarrhea, were common adverse effects. The main pathogens isolated before treatment were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Eradication rates at the end of treatment were 90% (36 out of 40) for the dirithromycin group and 92.5% (37 out of 40) for the azithromycin group. Persistence of H. influenzae isolates was found in 3 out of 11 (27.3%) patients treated with dirithromycin and in 2 out of 9 (22.2%) who had received azithromycin. At the late post-therapy visit, eradication occurred in 34 out of 36 (94.4%) strains in the dirithromycin group and in 33 out of 37 (89.2%) in the azithromycin group. We conclude that dirithromycin and azithromycin appear to be equally effective in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Retrospective evaluation of a potential interaction between azithromycine and warfarin in patients stabilized on warfarin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate a potential interaction between azithromycin and warfarin. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients stable on anticoagulation therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients who received a prescription for azithromycin and warfarin at any time since the hospital was opened, June 1, 1995, to July 22, 1999, were identified through a computerized report generated from the pharmacy prescription package. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients having a stable international normalized ratio (INR; defined as a therapeutic INR +/- 0.2) for at least two consecutive visits before receiving an azithromycin prescription were reviewed. Changes in INR from before and after addition of azithromycin were compared with changes in a control group. Controls were identified from a computer-generated report of patients who received a prescription for terazosin and warfarin at any time since the hospital was opened to July 22, 1999 (terazosin was chosen as it has no known interaction with warfarin). These patients also had a stable INR for at least two consecutive visits before receiving the terazosin prescription. In patients with INRs on record within 14 days after starting azithromycin or terazosin (9 patients/group), the average change in INR was 0.18 +/- 0.48 in the azithromycin group and 0.07 +/- 0.49 in the terazosin group (p=0.60). For patients with an INR on record within 30 days after starting azithromycin or terazosin (26 patients/group), the average change in INR was 0.25 +/- 0.67 in the azithromycin group and 0.05 +/- 0.55 in the terazosin group (p=0.18). CONCLUSION: An interaction between azithromycin and warfarin was not observed in this retrospective review of patients with a stable INR receiving the combination.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Periodontal tissue disposition of azithromycin in patients affected by chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases.

BACKGROUND: The recognition that periodontal diseases are associated with specific pathogens has led to interest in the use of antibacterial drugs for inhibition of these microorganisms. On these bases, the present study was aimed at evaluating the tissue distribution of the new macrolide antibiotic azithromycin in patients subjected to oral surgery for chronic inflammatory diseases of both marginal and periapical periodontium. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were treated with azithromycin 500 mg/day orally for 3 consecutive days, and drug concentrations in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological periodontal tissues were evaluated. For this purpose, samples of blood, saliva, normal gingiva, granulation tissue, and radicular granuloma or cyst wall (from dentigerous cyst) were collected during oral surgery or 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 days after the end of pharmacological treatment; then, azithromycin levels were measured by a microbiological plate assay, using Micrococcus luteus NCTC 8440 as the indicator organism. RESULTS: The concentrations of azithromycin in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological tissues reached the highest values 12 hours after the last dose (0.37+/-0.05 mg/l, 2.12+/-0.30 mg/l, 6.30+/-0.68 mg/kg, and 11.60+/-1.50 mg/kg, respectively) and then declined gradually. Consistent levels of the drug in normal gingiva and pathological tissues could be detected, however, up to 6.5 days, indicating that azithromycin was retained in target tissues for a long time after the end of treatment. Moreover, azithromycin levels in both normal gingiva and pathological tissues exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations of most pathogens involved in the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases. Notably, azithromycin levels in pathological tissues were significantly higher than those in normal gingiva 0.5, 2.5, and 4.5 days after the last dose. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate a marked penetration of azithromycin into both normal and pathological periodontal tissues, suggesting that azithromycin represents a promising option in both adjunctive and prophylactic treatments of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Interaction between piroxicam and azithromycin during distribution to human periodontal tissues.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are important in the prevention of infections and pain associated with periodontal surgery as well as in the adjunctive therapy of periodontal disease. In this study, patients undergoing oral surgery were treated with piroxicam and azithromycin to examine the interactions of these drugs on periodontal tissues. METHODS: Sixty-six patients were assigned to 3 groups and treated for 3 days as follows: 1) piroxicam 20 mg/day; 2) azithromycin 500 mg/day; or 3) piroxicam 20 mg/day plus azithromycin 500 mg/day. Samples of blood, saliva, gingiva, and alveolar bone were collected during surgery and at days 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 after last dose. Piroxicam concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and azithromycin concentrations by microbiological assay. RESULTS: In patients treated with piroxicam alone, the highest drug concentrations were found in plasma at each time point, but consistent piroxicam levels were also detected in gingival samples up to 4.5 days. The combined treatment with piroxicam plus azithromycin was associated with a reduction of piroxicam concentrations in periodontal tissues. In patients receiving azithromycin alone, high drug levels were measured in periodontal tissues up to 6.5 days. This distribution pattern did not vary in patients treated with piroxicam plus azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with piroxicam or azithromycin alone ensures a favorable distribution of these drugs into periodontal tissues. However, upon combined administration, azithromycin interferes negatively with the periodontal disposition of piroxicam. This interaction might depend on the displacement of piroxicam from acceptor sites at the level of periodontal tissues.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Determination of azithromycin in gastric biopsy samples.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the concentration of azithromycin in gastric biopsy samples of gastritis patients undergoing Heliobacter pylori eradication treatment with azithromycin as one antibiotic constituent of the medication. PATIENTS: Seven male outpatients, non-smokers, non-alcoholics, aged 25-40 years (mean 32 years), suffering from gastritis with involvement of H. pylori. METHODS: The patients received a 5-day treatment with azithromycin (1 x 500 mg on day 1 and 1 x 250 mg on days 2-5), 40 mg pantoprazole once daily and 2 x 400 mg metronidazole once daily. Samples of gastric tissue were obtained from 5 patients and of gastric juice from 2 patients, at the occasion of gastroscopic interventions. The gastric samples were subject to analysis of azithromycin, using a highly sensitive and specific HPLC method with electrochemical detection. RESULTS: The median concentrations of azithromycin in gastric tissue amounted to 7.5 microg/g on day 2 and to 9.7 microg/g on day 5 of the treatment. Four days after the end of treatment, median concentrations were still at 3.9 microg/g. In all tissue samples, azithromycin concentrations were well above the MIC for H. pylori (0.25 microg/ml). The well-known tissue affinity of azithromycin was underlined by the lack of detectable levels in gastricjuice. CONCLUSION: The high concentrations of azithromycin observed in gastric tissue of patients with gastritis on a 5-day dosage regimen point to a favorable pharmacokinetic basis for a role of azithromycin as a component of the eradication therapy of Heliobacter pylori.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A study of the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and nelfinavir when coadministered in healthy volunteers.

A two-way, open-label, crossover study in 12 subjects was undertaken to study the potential for azithromycin to alter the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and/or its active metabolite, M8. A secondary objective was to characterize any potential interaction that nelfinavir may have with azithromycin. During one dosing arm, subjects received a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin. During the other, subjects received 11 days of nelfinavir 750 mg q8h with a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin given concurrently with the Day 9 morning nelfinavir dose. Serum samples were collected after each azithromycin dose for 168 hours and after the Day 8 and 9 morning nelfinavir doses for 8 hours to characterize azithromycin, nelfinavir, and M8 pharmacokinetic parameters during both control and test periods. Both dosing regimens were well tolerated, with only mild to moderate GI side effects being the most frequently reported. Azithromycin was found to cause a statistically, though not clinically, significant decrease in nelfinavir and M8 exposures. In contrast, nelfinavir caused azithromycin Cmax and exposure (AUC) values to increase by > 100%. Inhibition of p-glycoprotein by nelfinavir may be responsible for this significant interaction. This increase in azithromycin exposure has the potential to increase clinical antibacterial efficacy without significantly increasing gastrointestinal side effects, though the impact on other systemic sites needs to be studied.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Activity of artemether-azithromycin versus artemether-doxycycline in the treatment of multiple drug resistant falciparum malaria.

The efficacy of the combination of artemether with doxycycline or azithromycin was evaluated in 60 patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria who attended malaria clinic in Mae Sot, Tak Province (Thai-Myanmar border). Patients (30 each) were randomized to receive (a) 300 mg artemether together with 100 mg doxycycline as initial doses, followed by 100 mg artemether plus 100 mg doxycycline at 12 hours later, then 100 mg doxycycline every 12 hours for another 4 days, or (b) 300 mg artemether together with 500 mg azithromycin, followed by 250 mg azithromycin at 24 and 48 hours. The follow-up period was 28 days. Patients in either group had a rapid initial response to treatment with comparable PCT and FCT. The cure rate of artemether-azithromycin regimen was significantly lower than that of artemether-doxycycline regimen (14.8 vs 53.3%). Low cure rate from artemether-azithromycin combination in this study was likely to be due to inadequate azithromycin dosage. However, with the low incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects, the once daily dose of azithromycin could still be increased in order to enhance its clinical efficacy. The simplicity of drug administration and lesser incidence of adverse effects make azithromycin a more proper partner of artemether than doxycycline. Further dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study with the artemether-azithromycin combination is encouraging.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of in vitro activity of azithromycin and ampicillin against 31 isolates of Streptococcus milleri.

Antibacterial action of azithromycin against 31 strains of dental infection-derived Streptococcus milleri and tissue transfer of the agent were compared with ampicillin, the drug of first choice for dental infections. Concentrations required to inhibit 50% of isolates(MIC50) and Concentrations required to kill 50% of isolates(MBC50) were 0.10 and 0.2 microgram/ml, respectively, for azithromycin. The antibacterial action of azithromycin was 4 times more potent in than ampicillin. The MBC90 for azithromycin was 0.39 microgram/ml, for amplicill 3.13 micrograms/ml. Bactericidally, azithromycin was 8 times more active than ampicillin. The peak value of concentrations (Cmax) of azithromycin was 0.45 microgram/ml, about 1/10 that of ampicillin. The half-life of azithromycin was 10 hours, about 5 times longer than that of ampicillin. The contact time of MIC90 concentrations for azithromycin was 12 hours, distinctly longer than the 8 hours calculated for ampicillin. Azithromycin showed excellent tissue transfer concentrations: the gingival transfer concentration following oral administration of 500 mg/day ranged from 0.7-23.5 micrograms/ml.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Single-dose azithromycin for Chlamydia in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and occurrence of severe side effects associated with the use of a single dose of azithromycin in the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: Patients and their sexual partners were randomized into three treatment groups: both the patient and her sexual partner received a single dose of azithromycin (group 1); the patient was given a standard course of erythromycin, while her partner was given a standard course of tetracycline (group 2); and the patient was given a single dose of azithromycin with the sexual partner given a standard course of tetracycline (group 3). Group 3 was included in order to assess the relative efficacy of tetracycline with respect to the use of azithromycin among patients and to indirectly assess possible patient reinfection by sexual partners. RESULTS: With respect to the cure rate, 4.5% of study participants given azithromycin has positive cultures vs. 21.1% of patients given erythromycin or tetracycline (P = .018). With respect to side effects severe enough to warrant a change in medication, 7.4% of patients receiving azithromycin reported suffering such side effects vs. 38.8% of patients given erythromycin (P = .02). Among sexual partners, 28.6% given tetracycline reported severe side effects vs. none of those given azithromycin (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Azithromycin in the treatment of C trachomatis in pregnant women substantially improved the cure rates while substantially reducing the occurrence of severe side effects associated with the use of a standard course of erythromycin. Since both tetracycline and erythromycin are known to be effective against C trachomatis infection, the improved efficacy of azithromycin is probably due to noncompliance with the multidose, multiday regimen associated with the use of these two antibiotics.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

[An experimental study on the effect of azithromycin treatment in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis of rats].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects and mechanism of azithromycin treatment in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis of rats. METHODS: Animal model of bleomycin-A5-induced pulmonary fibrosis was established in rats.36 animal models were divided into two groups: a bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis group and a azithromycin group in which the animal models were treated with azithromycin (80 mg/kg once a day for three continuous days in a week). The animals of the two groups were killed at the first,second and fourth week respectively. Another six rats constituted a normal control group, instillated withsaline intratracheally and killed at the first week. Pathological changes activity of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) of alveolar macrophage, cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) mRNA expression and protein levels of alveolar macrophage and lung tissue were studied or measured. RESULTS: Amelioration of alveolitis and lung fibrosis after treatment with azithromycin was shown in pathological section (P < 0.05). The activity of NF-kappaB was significantly higher in one-week pulmonary fibrosis model than that in normal control and its level in alveolar macrophage reduced (67.2%) after treatment with azithromycin. The level of protein and mRNA of TNFalpha, TGF-beta in lung tissue and alveolar macrophage was increased in the early stage of pulmonary fibrosis and reduced after treatment with azithromycin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that azithromycin might be a therapeutic drug for pulmonary fibrosis in the future. Azithromycin reduced the degree of alveolitis and fibrosis through inhibition of the activity of NF-kappaB and the expression of TNFalpha, TGF-beta mRNA and lowering the level of protein in alveolar macrophage and lung tissue in the early stage of pulmonary fibrosis. This might be one of the mechanisms of azithromycin treatment in pulmonary fibrosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Azithromycin vs cefuroxime plus erythromycin for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin dihydrate monotherapy with those of a combination of cefuroxime axetil plus erythromycin as empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. The standard therapy of cefuroxime plus erythromycin was consistent with the American Thoracic Society, Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Consensus Group, and Infectious Disease Society of America consensus guidelines. The doses were intravenous azithromycin (500 mg once daily) followed by oral azithromycin (500 mg once daily), intravenous cefuroxime (750 mg every 8 hours), followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily), and erythromycin (500-1000 mg) intravenously or orally every 6 hours. Randomization was stratified by severity of illness and age. Patients who were immunosuppressed or residing in nursing homes were excluded. RESULTS: Data from 145 patients (67 received azithromycin and 78 received cefuroxime plus erythromycin) were evaluable. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated in 19% (28/145) and 13% (19/145), respectively. The atypical pathogens accounted for 33% (48/145) of the etiologic diagnoses; Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were identified in 14% (20/ 145), 10% (15/145), and 9% (13/145), respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 91% (61/67) of the patients in the azithromycin group and 91% (71/78) in the cefuroxime plus erythromycin group. Adverse events (intravenous catheter site reactions, gastrointestinal tract disturbances) were significantly more common in patients who received cefuroxime plus erythromycin (49% [30/78]) than in patients who received azithromycin (12% [8/67]) (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with azithromycin was as effective as cefuroxime plus erythromycin in the empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients who were hospitalized. Azithromycin was well tolerated.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Ocular levels of azithromycin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess azithromycin levels in human serum, aqueous humor, tear fluid, and conjunctival tissue specimens after administration of a single 1-g oral dose of azithromycin. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing cataract surgery were included in this analysis. Serum, aqueous, and tear specimens were collected 3, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after azithromycin administration. Conjunctival tissue biopsy specimens were collected 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 days after azithromycin administration. All specimens were subjected to analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Azithromycin concentration ranges during the specified sampling times were as follows: serum, 21 to 974 ng/mL; tear, 82 to 2892 ng/mL; aqueous, 10 to 69 ng/mL; and conjunctival, 0.7 to 32 micrograms/g. Levels above the 90% minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC90) for Chlamydia trachomatis were detected after 4 days in all tear samples and after 14 days in all conjunctival tissue specimens following oral azithromycin administration. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated prolonged high levels of azithromycin in drug-targeted ocular tissue. Prolonged high concentrations of azithromycin in conjunctival tissue make this drug suitable for treatment of conjunctivitis caused by chlamydiae and other susceptible organisms.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Corneal pharmacokinetics of topically applied azithromycin and clarithromycin.

PURPOSE: To determine corneal levels of topically administered azithromycin and clarithromycin in a rabbit model. DESIGN: Experimental animal study. METHODS: Corneas of New Zealand albino rabbits were treated with topical azithromycin (2 mg/ml or 4 mg/ml) or clarithromycin (10 mg/ml). Topical azithromycin was prepared from an intravenous solution and topical clarithromycin from a suspension for oral use. All rabbits received one drop every 2 hours on the right eye. Groups of rabbits were treated for the following intervals: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours (four rabbits for each combination of time point, drug, and dose). Corneal tissue was removed 1 hour after the last application. To investigate stability of tissue azithromycin levels, an additional group of four rabbits was treated for 24 hours, but corneal tissue was not removed until 24 hours later. Samples were homogenized, and drug concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis and bioactivity assay. RESULTS: Corneal concentrations of azithromycin increased with drug dosage and duration of application. Rabbits treated with azithromycin tolerated the drug well without signs of irritation. Clarithromycin was undetectable in corneal tissue by HPLC and bioactivity assay for all rabbits. Some rabbits treated with clarithromycin had signs of ocular surface irritation. CONCLUSION: Measurable concentrations of azithromycin are achieved in corneal tissue after topical application in a rabbit model, and the drug is well tolerated. Azithromycin may be a useful antibiotic for the topical treatment of human corneal infections, but clarithromycin, in currently available formulations, may not be effective because of poor tissue penetration.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2006

Azithromycin has a direct relaxant effect on precontracted airway smooth muscle.

Macrolides have been proven to have beneficial bacteriostatic and anti-inflammatory properties, but very little is known about the potential value of their bronchodilatory effect. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the effect of azithromycin on contractile responses of isolated rabbit tracheal strips to carbachol or KCl. Azithromycin has a relaxant, concentration-dependent effect on tracheal strips precontracted with carbachol (300 nM), significant from the concentration of 1 muM. The mechanical removal of epithelium did not alter the effect of azithromycin. Azithromycin (100 microM) also relaxed tracheal strips precontracted with KCl (80 mM) even in the presence of atropine (100 microM). Moreover, azithromycin (100 microM) decreased contractions induced by 300 nM and 10 microM carbachol to 55.4% and 80.5% of initial contraction, respectively. The relaxant effect of azithromycin persisted in both calcium free solution and in the presence of the calcium channel antagonist, verapamil. The relaxant effect of azithromycin was not altered by the pre-treatment of preparations with the inhibitors of Ca(2+)-ATPase (cyclopiazonic acid), Na(+)-K(+) ATPase (ouabain), Rho-associated kinase [(R)-(+)-trans-4-(1-aminoethyl)-N-(4-pyridyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide dihydrochloride] (Y-27632) or the non-specific cAMP and cGMP phosphodiesterases inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-2,6(1H,3H)-purinedione (IBMX). These results suggest that azithromycin has a concentration-dependent, epithelium-independent, direct relaxant effect on precontracted tracheal strips that is not mediated via inhibition of Ca(2+) influx or Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. Also, it is not due to alteration of the function of Na(+)-K(+) ATPase and does not depend on the formation of cAMP/cGMP or the Rho/Rho-activated kinase pathway.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: are the differences real?

Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are clinically effective for the treatment of common respiratory and skin/skin-structure infections. Erythromycin and azithromycin are also effective for treatment of nongonococcal urethritis and cervicitis due to Chlamydia trachomatis. Compared with erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin offer improved tolerability. Clarithromycin, however, is more similar to erythromycin in pharmacokinetic measures such as half-life, tissue distribution, and drug interactions. Misunderstandings about differences among the macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin) and the azalide (azithromycin) in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, spectrum of activity, safety, and cost are common. The uptake and release of these compounds by white blood cells and fibroblasts account for differences in tissue half-life, volume of distribution, intracellular:extracellular ratio, and in vivo potency. Although microbiologic studies reveal that gram-positive pathogens are equally susceptible to these agents, significantly more isolates of Haemophilus influenzae are susceptible to azithromycin than to erythromycin or clarithromycin. Concentrations achieved at the infection site and duration above the minimum inhibitory concentration are as important as in vitro activity in determining in vivo activity against bacterial pathogens. Analysis of safety data indicates differences among these agents in drug interactions and use in pregnancy. Analysis of safety data reveals pharmacokinetic drug interactions for erythromycin and clarithromycin with theophylline, terfenadine, and carbamazepine that are not found with azithromycin. Both erythromycin and azithromycin are pregnancy category B drugs; clarithromycin is a category C drug. The numerous differences in pharmacokinetics, microbiology, safety, and costs among erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin can be used in the judicious selection of treatment for indicated infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1997

A short (3-day) course of azithromycin tablets versus a 10-day course of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections and effects on long-term outcome.

The efficacy and safety of a 3-day regimen of azithromycin prescribed in the new tablet form and of a 10-day regimen of amoxycillin clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav, Augmentin) were compared in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections. Of the 144 enrolled patients, 123 had a Type 1 acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), three patients had pneumonia, and 18 had purulent bronchitis. Treatment was successful, defined as cure or major improvement on day 14, in 59/62 (95%) patients in the azithromycin treatment group compared with 54/61 (90%) patients in the co-amoxiclav. At 30 days, the incidence of success was 77% (48/62) in the azithromycin treated group, compared with 66% (40/61) of co-amoxiclav-treated patients. At 60 days, incidences were 66% (41/62) and 59% (36/61), respectively. Several pathogens were isolated: Haemophilus influenzae in 21 patients (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range for azithromycin 0.12-4 mg/l; co-amoxiclav 0.25-4 mg/l); Streptococcus pneumoniae in nine (MIC azithromycin < or = 0.06 > or = 256 mg/l; co-amoxiclav < or = 0.06-1 mg/l); and Moraxella catarrhalis in 11 (MIC azithromycin < or =0.06-2 mg/l; co-amoxiclav < or = 0.06-0.5 mg/l). Microbiological response rates were comparable. A significant correlation between clinical and microbiological cure was found (p = 0.02, power 0.6). In 15 (10%) patients, positive serology for viruses or atypical pathogens was found. In the co-amoxiclav-treatment group, 24 patients had mild adverse events (12 diarrhoea), compared with 27 treated with azithromycin (p = 0.47). It is concluded that a 3-day regimen of azithromycin prescribed as tablets is as clinically and microbiologically effective as a 10-day regimen of co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Moreover, since the percentage of viral infections was low and a significant correlation between microbiological and clinical cure was found, this study shows that clinical symptoms can be used to establish which patients with AECB (Type 1) should be treated with antimicrobial agents.

Adult↗