Treatment of psoriasis with intramuscular alefacept.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Comment↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Alefacept”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Alefacept plus methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Rituximab and alefacept. 1-6 March 2002, New York City, NY, USA.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis by selective targeting of memory effector T lymphocytes.
BACKGROUND: Psoriatic plaques are characterized by infiltration with CD4+ CD45RO+ and CD8+ CD45RO+ memory effector T lymphocytes. The recombinant protein alefacept binds to CD2 on memory effector T lymphocytes, inhibiting their activation. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we evaluated alefacept as a treatment for psoriasis. Two hundred twenty-nine patients with chronic psoriasis received intravenous alefacept (0.025, 0.075, or 0.150 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo weekly for 12 weeks, with follow-up for 12 additional weeks. Before treatment, the median scores on the psoriasis area-and-severity index were between 14 and 20 in all groups (0 denotes no psoriasis and 72 the most severe disease possible). RESULTS: Alefacept was well tolerated and nonimmunogenic. The mean reduction in the score on the psoriasis area-and-severity index two weeks after treatment was greater in the alefacept groups (38, 53, and 53 percent in the groups receiving 0.025, 0.075, and 0.150 mg per kilogram, respectively) than in the placebo group (21 percent, P<0.001). Twelve weeks after treatment, 28 patients who had received alefacept alone were clear or almost clear of psoriasis. Three patients in the placebo group were clear or almost clear; all three had received additional systemic therapy for psoriasis. Alefacept reduced peripheral-blood memory effector T-lymphocyte (CD45RO+) counts, and the reduction in the number of memory-effector T lymphocytes was correlated with the improvement in psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with alefacept for 12 weeks is associated with improvement in chronic plaque psoriasis; some patients have a sustained clinical response after the cessation of treatment. Alefacept selectively targets CD45RO+ memory effector T lymphocytes, suggesting that they have a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.
Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
Targeting T-cell subsets to achieve remission.
Patients with psoriasis have an increase in pathogenic CD45RO+ memory-effector T cells during active disease. The genetically engineered fully human fusion protein alefacept has been developed to selectively target this subset of T cells. Alefacept binds to memory-effector CD45RO+ T cells, inhibiting their activation and inducing T-cell apoptosis. The selectivity of alefacept for memory-effector CD45RO+ T cells was evaluated in 229 patients with chronic psoriasis in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study conducted at 22 centres in the USA. Patients received alefacept intravenously at doses of 0.025 mg/kg, 0.075 mg/kg, or 0.150 mg/kg, or placebo once weekly for 12 weeks. Two weeks after completing treatment, patients receiving alefacept showed significant improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) compared with those receiving placebo. Mean reductions in the PASI score were up to 53% lower than baseline scores in the alefacept treatment group, compared with a 21% decline from baseline in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In addition to the significant improvement in psoriasis, treatment with alefacept produced long-term remission in some patients. Twelve weeks after completion of therapy, 28 patients became clear or almost clear. The therapy was well tolerated and nonimmunogenic. Importantly, during treatment, there was a correlation between improvement in psoriasis and a dose-dependent reduction in peripheral blood CD45RO+ memory-effector T cells, but not in CD45RA+ naive T cells. This correlation indicates a relationship between a specific T-cell subset reduction (CD45RO+) and clinical outcome in psoriasis.
Adolescent↗
Clinical monograph for drug formulary review: systemic agents for psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis.
BACKGROUND: Significant advances in the pharmacologic treatment of psoriasis, most notably the introduction of the biologic agents efalizumab and alefacept, have occurred recently. In addition, another biologic agent, etanercept, was recently approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, thus adding to the list of biologic agents approved for the treatment of these disease states. A review was conducted by the Drug Information Service of a pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) to determine the relative merits and place in therapy of commonly used systemic agents for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To provide readers with a comprehensive clinical monograph on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis agents, written with a managed care perspective, as used in actual drug formulary decision making by a PBM. METHODS: The drug formulary of this PBM is designed to provide health plans with an evidence-based review of drugs, therapeutic classes, and disease states with a managed care focus. For each therapeutic class or disease review, an extensive and thorough literature search of MEDLINE is conducted for efficacy, safety, effectiveness, and humanistic and economic data. Drug/disease-state databases (UpToDate online, MICROMEDEX), U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical reviews, key Internet sites, medical/pharmacy-related news sites, clinical guidelines, and AMCP dossiers are also reviewed. Formulary drug monographs produced by the Drug Information Service of the PBM include a critical analysis and summary of disease-oriented and patient-oriented clinical outcomes, effectiveness, and humanistic data. Additional data considered and included in the formulary review process are clinical attributes, patent expirations/generic competition, off-label or pending indications, and pharmacoeconomic data. RESULTS: The biologic agents do not appear to be as efficacious as traditional systemic therapies but are associated with fewer long-term toxicities that often limit treatment duration with traditional systemic agents. Although no head-to-head comparisons between alefacept and efalizumab exist, efalizumab appears to offer slightly higher efficacy rates, while alefacept has a longer duration of action. Etanercept at the higher approved dose appears more efficacious compared with efalizumab or alefacept for the treatment of psoriasis, and it is the only biologic currently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Efalizumab and alefacept are generally well tolerated, but rebound flare of psoriasis is associated with efalizumab, thus requiring continuous treatment to avoid a flare in disease. Efalizumab and etanercept can be self-administered by the patient, while alefacept and infliximab require administration by a health care professional. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy is reserved for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis or patients with psoriatic arthritis. The biologic agents are not as efficacious as traditional therapies but, due to better tolerability, are gaining acceptance in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The biologic agents differ in efficacy rates and are generally well tolerated. Clinical attributes, overall efficacy, and economic costs associated with the biologic agents will be significant factors in selecting agents for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
Arthritis, Psoriatic↗
Retrospective assessment of PASI 50 and PASI 75 attainment with a calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment.
BACKGROUND: The US National Psoriasis Foundation recently recommended that PASI 50 and PASI 75 response rates be used in clinical trials to enable comparisons across studies of different psoriasis therapies. To date, these response rates have not been reported for the two-compound ointment containing calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (Daivobet/Dovobet; LEO Pharma, Ballerup, Denmark). Further, in order to compare Daivobet with other therapeutics recently presented to the European regulatory authorities and the FDA, comparison with the biologicals, efalizumab, etanercept and alefacept, were also made. OBJECTIVES: To present the PASI 50 and PASI 75 results for the two-compound ointment containing calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate. METHODS: Data from six phase III studies conducted with the two-compound ointment were pooled and the PASI 50 and PASI 75 response rates calculated for patients with severe (PASI>or=17) or less severe disease (PASI<17) at treatment commencement. Results for the biological therapies, efalizumab, etanercept and alefacept, were obtained from relevant published phase III studies. RESULTS: PASI 50 and PASI 75 were achieved by more patients treated with the two-compound ointment than with the individual components. In patients with severe disease, the PASI 50 response rate after 4 weeks' treatment was 88.8% with the two-compound ointment, 69.2% with betamethasone dipropionate, 53.8% with calcipotriol, and 30.0% with ointment vehicle. In comparison, 12 weeks' treatment with the biologicals resulted in PASI 50 response rates of 59% with efalizumab, 74% with etanercept, and 56% with alefacept. CONCLUSIONS: The two-compound ointment is effective, producing a PASI 50 and PASI 75 response in greater than 80% and 50% of patients, respectively, regardless of psoriasis severity.
Alefacept↗
Advancements in the treatment of psoriasis: role of biologic agents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of biologic agents as antipsoriatic therapy. SUMMARY: Mild psoriasis can generally be managed with topical therapy. Moderate-to-severe psoriasis has traditionally been treated with systemic therapies such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, retinoids, and phototherapy (ultraviolet B, psoralen plus ultraviolet A). The treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis often do not meet patient and physician expectations because of significant side effects (e.g., organ toxicity, skin cancer), lack of durable efficacy, and inconvenient administration schedules (e.g., daily dosing, multiple weekly exposures). The recognition of psoriasis as a T-cell.mediated disease has led to the development of biologic agents that more specifically target key steps in the pathologic process. A review of the literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that have been published on the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life effects of both approved and investigational biologics for the treatment of psoriasis. The first 2 biologic agents for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003, alefacept in January and efalizumab in October. Both agents have demonstrated favorable safety profiles in clinical trials and significant benefits on patient quality of life. Head-to-head trials are lacking, but in placebo controlled trials, similar percentages of patients appear to respond to each of these 2 drugs. An advantage of alefacept is that it has been shown in clinical trials to provide durable off-treatment efficacy (approximately 7 months). Efalizumab has a relatively quick onset of antipsoriatic effect, but it needs to be administered once weekly continuously to maintain symptom control. Etanercept (approved by the FDA for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in May 2004) and infliximab (not FDA-approved for psoriasis treatment) have also shown promise in randomized controlled trials, although less data are available on these agents. Case reports and pilot studies suggest that other biologics under investigation may also prove useful for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient populations that may particularly benefit from biologic therapy are discussed. CONCLUSION: Biologic agents appear to offer a safe and effective alternative to conventional systemic therapies and phototherapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The biologics appear to be safer than traditional therapies, although long-term safety data still need to be established.
Alefacept↗
Role of novel biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis: effects on joints and skin.
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a partly debilitating disease that may affect small and large joints and the spine. Patients with PsA are divided into different subgroups according to joint involvement and their disease may be classified as part of the spectrum of spondyloarthritides or seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Traditional treatment comprises nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic and intra-articular corticosteroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as sulfasalazine, methotrexate and cyclosporin. On the basis of the very recent studies performed in the US and Germany, patients with severe disease can be treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Biologicals such as etanercept and infliximab have been used successfully to treat PsA. While etanercept is a 75kD TNF receptor fusion protein that binds to TNFalpha and TNFbeta, infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to TNFalpha both in its soluble form in the serum and on the cell membrane. Adalimumab is a fully humanised antibody recognising TNFalpha that has not been tested in PsA to date. Another biological agent, alefacept, is directed against the adhesion molecule lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-2, which is known to interfere with T-cell activation. Alefacept has been shown to be efficacious in a limited number of patients with PsA. Taken together, there has been definite recent progress in the treatment of PsA. Severely affected patients may especially have substantial benefit from therapy with biologicals directed against TNFalpha and other targets.
Alefacept↗
The long-term efficacy and safety of new biological therapies for psoriasis.
Long-term therapy is often required for psoriasis. This article reviews the most recent long-term clinical data for biological agents that have been approved or for which late-stage development data have been released for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Efficacy data are available for up to five 12-week courses of alefacept (approximately 60 weeks of therapy), 36 months (144 weeks) of continuous efalizumab, 48 weeks of continuous etanercept, and 50 weeks of bimonthly infliximab. Data sources include publications, product labeling, and posters presented at recent international scientific meetings. Alefacept appears to continue to be efficacious over multiple treatment courses for some responsive patients. The efficacy of efalizumab achieved during the first 12-24 weeks of therapy appears to be maintained or improved through at least 60 weeks of continuous treatment. The efficacy of etanercept appears to be maintained through at least 48 weeks of continuous treatment. Infliximab demonstrates a high response rate soon after initiation, which appears to be maintained through 24 weeks but declines modestly with therapy out to 50 weeks. After 48 weeks, approximately 60% of efalizumab-treated and 45% of etanercept-treated patients remaining on therapy achieved > or =75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, as did 70.5% of infliximab patients who did not miss more than two infusions. Safety data suggest that these agents may be used for long-term administration. Long-term data from psoriasis trials continue to accumulate. Recent data suggest that biological therapies have efficacy and safety profiles suitable for the long-term treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.
Dermatologic Agents↗
Fulfilling an unmet need in psoriasis : do biologicals hold the key to improved tolerability?
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin affecting approximately 2% of the world's population. Traditional systemic treatments, including methotrexate, ciclosporin, psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), oral retinoids and fumaric acid esters, are widely used for severe disease and are effective in the short term. Severe psoriasis is a chronic disease and patients and physicians have expressed concerns about possible harm from organ toxicity, such as skin cancer (PUVA), hyperlipidaemia (retinoids), renal (ciclosporin) or hepatotoxicity (methotrexate). Long-term monitoring is required and may not detect early organ damage. The pathophysiology of psoriasis remains to be clarified, but advances toward the understanding of the immunological basis of psoriasis have uncovered the involvement of immunological pathways; for example, the role of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, T cell proliferation and T cell activation, and migration to the epidermis. This advancement in knowledge combined with developments in recombinant technologies has led to the development of target-specific therapies. Biological agents are defined as proteins that can be extracted from animal tissue or produced via recombinant DNA technologies and possess pharmacological activity. Adalimumab, alefacept, infliximab, efalizumab and etanercept are examples of biological agents currently used for the treatment of psoriasis. Some of these are also therapy for other autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. These biological agents are effective in psoriasis but raise new safety concerns. Information on the safety of biological agents in conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease can not be directly extrapolated to psoriasis. An increased incidence of lymphomas has been postulated to be associated with etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab; serious infections, such as tuberculosis, have also been reported with these three biologicals, all of which target TNF-alpha. Demyelinating disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, have been reported with some biologicals as has congestive heart failure. Alefacept, because of its mechanism of action of lowering the number of active T cells, is associated with low T cell counts. Efalizumab has been associated with thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia. Data on the safety of >2.5 years' continuous treatment with efalizumab are reassuring and a valuable beginning to understanding the role and risk of harm of long-term therapy for a chronic disease. Longer follow-up studies and safety databases, for each of the biologicals used in psoriasis, are needed to ensure both prolonged efficacy and minimal risk of harm.
Biological Products↗
Recommendations for incorporating biologicals into management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: individualized patient approaches.
Psoriasis is a T-cell mediated skin disease that affects approximately 2% of the population worldwide. Despite the prevalence of the disease and long-standing efforts to develop strategies to treat it, there is a need for safe and effective therapies to treat psoriasis, particularly the more severe forms. Biological agents such as alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab have been recognized as a class of treatment distinct from other forms of therapy in the treatment algorithm of psoriasis. Recent national and international consensus meetings have developed statements that position biological agents as an important addition to the treatment armamentarium for moderate to severe psoriasis, along with phototherapy and traditional systemic agents. There has been consensus that treatment should be individualized to each patient's needs and circumstances. Biological agents offer the hope of safe, effective, long-term management of moderate to severe psoriasis. As new agents receive approval from Health Canada, the available range of therapeutic options for treating this chronic disease will broaden. A Canadian Psoriasis Expert Panel recently convened in February 2005 to analyze, based on a series of clinical case scenarios, the indications, contraindications, and considerations for and against each of the four biological agents, derived from product labelling, where available, and from the efficacy and safety data from phase 3 and earlier clinical trials, as well as post-marketing reports. The Panel has formulated a set of recommendations for incorporating these biological agents into the current treatment paradigm of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and has identified the preferred biological agents for each patient based on individual needs and circumstances.
Alefacept↗
Overview of biologic agents in medicine and dermatology.
Three agents have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: alefacept, efalizumab, and etanercept. The field of dermatology has now entered a new era, joining other disciplines of medicine that have been using biologic agents for decades. These new therapies offer psoriatic patients the potential for safe and effective long-term management of this disease. This article reviews how an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis led to the development of these products.
Alefacept↗
Integrating biologic therapies into a dermatology practice: practical and economic considerations.
This article discusses the issues involved in the integration of biologic therapies for psoriasis into a dermatology practice. The requirements for staff, space, and other office adaptations are reviewed for infliximab, efalizumab, etanercept, and alefacept in their current injectable forms. Dermatologists will likely elect to offer some or all of these therapies depending on the adjustments necessary within their current practice, patient satisfaction, and the economic possibilities. This article provides information needed to guide dermatology practices in practical decisions regarding the use of biologic therapies.
Alefacept↗
Prominent production of IL-20 by CD68+/CD11c+ myeloid-derived cells in psoriasis: Gene regulation and cellular effects.
We assessed expression of IL-20 and its receptors in psoriasis, given the recent implication of IL-20 in epidermal hyperplasia. Psoriatic lesional (LS) skin consistently expressed more IL-20 mRNA than nonlesional (NL) skin. Immunoreactivity to IL-20 protein was greater in LS tissue and mainly localized to infiltrating CD68+/CD11c+ (myeloid-derived) dermal leukocytes. Because this contrasted with earlier reports of a keratinocyte source, we assessed IL-20 mRNA expression in a variety of cells in vitro, and confirmed a myeloid-derived cellular source (monocytes). Plastic adhesion, activation of beta2 integrins, and incubation with tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulated expression in these cells. IL-20 receptor (IL-20R)alpha and IL-20Rbeta mRNA was decreased in LS versus NL skin, which also contrasted with earlier findings. To investigate the relationship between IL-20 and disease activity, we examined psoriasis patients treated with the CD2-targeted agent alefacept. In therapeutic responders, lesional IL-20 mRNA decreased to NL levels, suggesting that CD2+ leukocytes may proximally regulate IL-20. Finally, to assess IL-20 function, we used microarrays to screen IL-20-treated keratinocytes, which demonstrated upregulation of disease-related and IFN-gamma-induced genes. Hence, IL-20 may influence inflammation through IFN-like effects. Together, these data indicate that IL-20 may be an important effector cytokine in psoriasis, and that its inhibition may represent a potential therapeutic target.
Adult↗
Consistent control of psoriasis by continuous long-term therapy: the promise of biological treatments.
Psoriasis is a chronic, incurable disease that frequently requires long-term treatment. Although many patients benefit from effective traditional systemic therapies, namely methotrexate, cyclosporin, retinoids and fumaric acid esters, and some patients achieve long-term disease control, unrestricted long-term administration is not recommended due to the potential for cumulative toxicity. In order to diminish the risk of toxicity, physicians have adopted various treatment approaches (e.g. rotational, sequential, intermittent, and combination). However, these approaches may not provide continuous disease control or a stable treatment regimen. The recent advent of targeted biological therapeutics such as etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, alefacept and efalizumab may offer physicians and their patients treatment options with improved safety profiles that may permit continuous disease control.
Alefacept↗
Understanding the new clinical landscape for psoriasis: a comparative review of biologics.
BACKGROUND: Encouraging results from clinical trials suggest that biologic therapies are effective treatments for psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs for psoriasis. METHODS: The studies reviewed include data on the biologies alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab. This article reviews all data published in the dermatology literature listed in the MEDLINE database, as well as data presented as abstracts and posters at dermatology society meetings, including the annual meetings of the American Academy of Dermatology. RESULTS: The majority of the studies used an improvement from baseline of 75% or more in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 75) as the primary measure of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, biologics represent an important addition to the psoriatic therapies and have a great impact on the disease course and life quality of those afflicted with psoriasis.
Alefacept↗
T-cell-targeted biologicals for psoriasis.
Psoriasis is now accepted as a T-cell-mediated disease and that targeting of T cell function and/or trafficking is a logical approach to therapy. As a consequence of recombinant DNA technologies biologic therapies are synthesisable in sufficient quantities for clinical use. The original proof of concept for T-cell-targeted therapies in psoriasis came with the demonstration that anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies were effective. Progress is such that two T-cell-directed biologicals - alefacept and efalizumab - have recently been approved in the U.S.A. for the treatment of psoriasis. In addition to providing new therapies the T-cell-targeted biologicals with their selective approach can be used as sophisticated tools to dissect out and help our understanding of key pathomechanisms in psoriasis; the non - efficacy of anti - E-selectin is a case in point. It is likely that the most appropriate place for T-cell-directed biologicals in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis will be for maintenance, rather than induction, of remission. This is a reflection of mode of action and relative safety for long-term administration.
Alefacept↗