Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of power Doppler (PD) ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced power Doppler (CEPD) US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the prediction of histopathologic stages. METHODS AND MATERIAL: 50 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were evaluated by the same radiologist with PD US and CEPD US. Air micro bubbles stabilized by a granulate of "galactose and palmitic acid" were used as a contrast medium for sonography with the concentration of 400 mg/ml. PD US and CEPD US results were later correlated with the surgical and histopathologic findings. PD US and CEPD US findings were considered positive for appendicitis; if there was depiction of hyperemia in the wall of the appendix or if there was depiction of prominent peripheral vascularity when compared with normal soft tissues; and negative if both hyperemia and peripheral hyperemia were not prominent. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Of the 50 patients, 35 patients had histopathologically proven acute appendicitis. CEPD US showed prominent hyperemia in the appendiceal vessels or feeding vessels of the inflamed appendix, and resistance index (RI) calculations were easier. There was statistically significant difference between mean RI values of the normal appendix, suppurative appendicitis and gangrenous appendicitis. PD US has accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 74% and CEPD US has 98%, and 100% in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. CEPD US identified 100% of suppurative appendicitis and gangrenous appendicitis. CONCLUSION: CEPD US is a promising method in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and determination of the inflammation stage.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

The computed tomography appearance of recurrent and chronic appendicitis.

The objective of this study was to determine computed tomography (CT) appearance of recurrent and chronic appendicitis. In 100 consecutive appendiceal CT examinations of proven appendicitis, 18 patients met criteria for recurrent (multiple discrete episodes) or chronic (continuous symptoms > 3 weeks, pathological findings) appendicitis. CT findings were reviewed. Ten patients had recurrent appendicitis, 3 had chronic appendicitis, 3 had both, and 2 had pathological chronic appendicitis. CT findings in 18 recurrent/chronic cases were identical to 82 acute appendicitis cases, including pericecal stranding (both 100%), dilated (> 6 mm) appendix (88.9% versus 93.9%), apical thickening (66.7% versus 69.5%), adenopathy (66.7% versus 61.0%), appendolith(s) (50% versus 42.7%), arrowhead (27.8% versus 22.0%), abscess (11.1% versus 11.0%), phlegmon (11.1% versus 6.1%), and fluid (5.6% versus 19.5%). CT findings in recurrent and chronic appendicitis are the same as those in acute appendicitis. Appendiceal CT can be beneficial for evaluating patients with suspected recurrent or chronic appendicitis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

The optimal initial treatment for selected patients with perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to diagnose perforated appendicitis preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of diagnosing perforated appendicitis using only admission factors. The study population was comprised of 366 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis during 1997. Admission factors associated with perforated appendicitis were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. These variables were then used to formulate a rule for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for this rule. The admission factors analyzed were sex, race, age, days of pain, temperature, heart rate, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory findings. Multivariate regression analysis revealed days of pain, temperature, and localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant to be significant (P <0.05). Using two or more days of pain, a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C), or localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant as criteria to indicate perforation, we achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 58% for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. We concluded that (1) perforated appendicitis cannot reliably be distinguished from nonperforated appendicitis based on admission factors, and (2) two or more days of pain, localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant, and a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C) define a group of patients with appendicitis who have a high incidence of perforation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Molecular detection of Campylobacter jejuni in archival cases of acute appendicitis.

The role of enteric bacteria in the pathogenesis of acute appendicitis is a controversial subject. Campylobacter jejuni has been previously demonstrated in a minority of cases of acute appendicitis using microbiological or immunohistochemical methods, notably in cases where inflammation was limited to the mucosa/submucosa. Our goal was to evaluate cases of acute appendicitis for C. jejuni DNA using molecular methods, and to compare our findings to the histologic features. In total, 50 archival cases of acute appendicitis were selected, and PCR was performed using primers targeting a 286-bp fragment of the mapA gene specific to C. jejuni. Twenty histologically unremarkable appendectomy specimens served as negative controls. Cases were reviewed with attention to particular histological features including mucosal ulceration, cryptitis, depth of inflammatory infiltrate, and the presence of mural necrosis. Of acute appendicitis cases, 22% (11/50) were positive for C. jejuni DNA by PCR analysis. Control cases were negative for C. jejuni DNA. All patients presented with signs and symptoms typical of acute appendicitis. Of the C. jejuni positive cases, only 27% contained acute inflammation limited to the mucosa/submucosa, whereas the remainder had mural or transmural inflammation; therefore, the histological features of C. jejuni-positive acute appendicitis cases were indistinguishable from C. jejuni-negative cases. In summary, C. jejuni DNA was detected in a significant percentage (22%) of acute appendicitis cases, a much higher percentage than previous studies using other methodologies. As C. jejuni is an enteric pathogen that does not exist as a commensal or nonpathogenic organism, the presence of C. jejuni DNA implies current or recent infection. Further study is needed to determine whether the presence of C. jejuni DNA in acute appendicitis indicates appendiceal involvement by C. jejuni enteritis, or if there is a true causative role for C. jejuni in acute appendicitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate transvaginal sonography with power Doppler capacity in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in discriminating appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe transvaginal sonographic findings of six women with acute appendicitis selected from 31 women seen in an emergency room setting for clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. The study population underwent gray-scale transvaginal sonography, and specific sonographic landmark findings for acute appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease were used. Hyperemia of any infectious complex was identified by power Doppler. Laparoscopy was performed after transvaginal sonography and was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Laparoscopy showed acute appendicitis in six (19%) of the 31 patients. A thick walled non-compressible gas-containing tubular structure with a diameter exceeding 6 mm was seen by transvaginal sonography in four of the six cases, consistent with uncomplicated appendicitis. A heterogeneous complex with surrounding hyperechogenic soft tissue was seen in two cases with gangrenous appendicitis. Power Doppler detected hyperemia in all six cases. Normal adnexal structures were imaged next to the inflamed appendix. The sonographic criteria consistent with acute appendicitis were clearly different from those of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonography provides an opportunity to distinguish between appendicitis and acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Prospective trials are needed in order to evaluate the impact of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Total antioxidant capacity in children with acute appendicitis.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate antioxidant capacity by using a novel automated method in children with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from consecutive patients with acute appendicitis (appendicitis group, n = 12) and acute abdominal pain due to non surgical disease (non-appendicitis group, n = 11), and from patients with inguinal hernia (healthy group, n = 12) as the control group. At admission, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels of plasma were evaluated in all patients by a method recently developed by Erel. Four other major individual plasma antioxidant components, the levels of total protein, albumin, uric acid and bilirubin, were also evaluated. Total antioxidant capacity in patients with acute appendicitis was statistically compared with the two other groups. RESULTS: While the TAC level in the appendicitis group was significantly greater than in the non-appendicitis group, no significant difference was found in healthy groups (p < 0.05, p > 0.05, 1.94 +/- 0.38, 1.40 +/- 0.36, and 1.99 +/- 0.35 respectively). Individual components of total antioxidant capacity, i.e. total protein, albumin, uric acid and bilirubin concentrations, were also higher in the patients with acute appendicitis than those of the other two control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that children with acute appendicitis do not have deficient blood plasma antioxidant capacity. These results provide evidence that acute appendicitis results in more induction of antioxidative response than non-surgical diseases.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1993

Characterisation of the local inflammatory response in appendicitis.

In this study we have characterised the local inflammatory response in acute suppurative appendicitis (S), focal appendicitis (F), and normal appendices (C). Enumeration of lymphocyte subpopulations, cells expressing IL-2 receptor, natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes and plasma cell isotypes and subclasses infiltrating the lamina propria was carried out on all specimens using immunoperoxidase staining procedures. Total T cells were significantly increased in both acute suppurative appendicitis and focal appendicitis compared with controls (p < 0.001). Cells infiltrating the lamina propria expressed IL-2 receptor in all appendiceal specimens but were significantly increased in both acute and focal appendicitis (p < 0.01). IgG and IgA plasma cell isotypes were significantly increased in all S and F appendiceal specimens (p < 0.001). Monocyte and NK cell numbers, however, were only increased in acute suppurative appendiceal specimens. The increased lymphocyte and plasma cell isotypes seen in focal appendicitis occurred throughout the entire organ even through the inflammatory focus was confined to only three to seven serial sections. These results clearly show a differential pattern of cellular infiltration in focal appendicitis from that seen in acute suppurative appendicitis. The selective lymphocyte and plasma cell nature of the cellular infiltrate in the lamina propria of focal appendicitis may reflect the presence of a specific immune response to an as yet unidentified luminal antigen as a possible cause of appendicitis.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory measurements such as leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration are commonly used as diagnostic aids in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The present study aimed to clarify the role of these laboratory tests in diagnosing acute appendicitis. METHODS: The medical records of 897 patients who underwent appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis during a 30-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The laboratory findings were correlated with the histopathology of the excised appendices. Data were analysed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the individual tests, as well as the test combinations. RESULTS: Histologically verified appendicitis was found in 740 of the 897 patients (82.5%). The rise in leucocyte count and neutrophil percentage correlated with the degree of appendiceal inflammation. The median CRP level was much higher in the patients with ruptured appendicitis compared with that in patients with a normal appendix (96.8 vs 39.6 mg/L, P < 0.001). However, patients with uncomplicated appendicitis had a lower median CRP concentration than those with a normal appendix, although the difference was not statistically significant (24.1 vs 39.6 mg/L, P = 0.079). The sensitivity of leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and CRP in diagnosing acute appendicitis was 85.8, 87.2 and 76.5%, respectively, whereas the specificity was 31.9, 33.1 and 26.1%, respectively. Of the 740 patients with acute appendicitis, only six had all three tests simultaneously within the reference interval. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal laboratory findings cannot reliably deliver a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, acute appendicitis is very unlikely when leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and CRP level are simultaneously normal.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

CT of appendicitis in children.

Appendicitis is the most common condition requiring intraabdominal surgery in infancy and childhood. Yet, despite its common occurrence, accurate diagnosis remains challenging. Acute appendicitis may be missed at initial clinical examination in 28%-57% of children aged 12 years and younger and in nearly 100% of children under the age of 2 years. Diagnostic imaging has an ever-increasing role in the prompt and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. At the authors' institution, helical computed tomography (CT) is the primary tool for diagnosing or excluding appendicitis in children. Since its inception in 1998, helical CT with rectally administered contrast material has been shown to reduce the total number of inpatient observation days, laparotomies with negative findings, and per-patient cost. Helical CT is a highly sensitive and specific tool for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis and has resulted in a beneficial change in patient care in 68.5% of all patients seen in the authors' emergency department for suspected appendicitis. This includes both those patients who receive an eventual diagnosis of appendicitis and those who do not have the disease. Major strengths of limited helical CT with rectal contrast material include producing uniformly high published sensitivity and specificity values for diagnosis of appendicitis and enabling diagnosis of alternative conditions of acute abdominal pain in children. In contrast, limitations of graded-compression ultrasonography in children include highly operator-dependent sensitivity and specificity values and relative infrequency with which the normal appendix can be visualized in this population. Although there have been many exciting diagnostic advancements for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population, the role of helical CT is far from clear. The purpose of this article is to describe a helical CT approach to imaging in children suspected of having acute appendicitis at a large urban pediatric teaching hospital and its effects on patient outcomes and hospital costs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Appendicitis in children and young adults: Doppler sonographic-pathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the following: whether the arterial supply of a normal appendix is visible with Doppler sonography; whether the physiologic vasodilatation that accompanies childhood appendicitis is visible; what Doppler patterns appear once necrosis of the appendix has occurred; what Doppler shifts are visible with chronic, recurrent appendicitis; and whether other conditions in the right lower quadrant can mimic the Doppler sonographic patterns of appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five fasting patients without abdominal pain or intestinal disease and 45 patients (1-25 years old; mean, 8 years old) with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis were examined sonographically, using 5- and 7-MHz linear, color, and pulsed Doppler transducers. Arterial signals were sought within the appendix and neighboring tissues, counted, and classified as sparse (1-2), moderate (3-4), or abundant (>4). The resistive index (RI) was measured. Thirty patients who underwent surgery were retained for surgical and pathologic correlation, and only they formed the appendicitis study. RESULTS: A normal appendix was found in 10 patients. Doppler shifts were sparse, and diastolic flow was low or absent (RI, 0.85-1). Acute uncomplicated appendicitis was found in 13 patients, who had abundant color Doppler signals throughout most of the appendix, with high diastolic flow (RI, 0.40-0.77; mean, 0.54). Acute necrotic appendicitis with perforation was found in 11 children, eight of whom showed no signals in the necrotic area at the tip. Few or no signals were seen in the remainder of the appendix (RI, 0.33-0.90; mean, 0.54). In two patients, signals were abundant in the tissues surrounding the appendix. Recurrent or chronic appendicitis was found in three patients, previously diagnosed as having Crohn's disease, psychosomatic illness, or nonspecific abdominal pain. The appendix had Doppler signals confined to the tip (RI, 0.63-0.83; mean, 0.75). Other diagnoses were found in three patients, in whom the appendix was not seen. There were abundant color signals in the intestinal wall and adjacent tissues in the right lower quadrant. Two patients had Crohn's disease, and the third had an unsuspected early pregnancy. The appendix was normal in all. CONCLUSION: Acute appendicitis is accompanied by inflammatory hypervascularity reflected as an increased number of color signals and higher diastolic Doppler shifts as compared with those found in normal persons. No Doppler shifts are identified in areas of appendiceal ischemia. Other acute inflammation in the right lower quadrant also produces numerous Doppler shifts with high diastolic flow, as does ovulation. Care must be taken to identify the source of these Doppler signals. The changing vascularity of healing, recurrent, and chronic appendicitis promises to further our understanding of the pathogenesis and evolution of this disease.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency abdominal surgery. To our knowledge, MR imaging has not been compared with sonography for revealing acute appendicitis. Our aim was to assess and compare the accuracy, advantages, and limitations of MR imaging and sonography in revealing appendicitis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 60 consecutive patients suspected of having appendicitis who underwent abdominal sonography and MR imaging. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo axial and coronal images were obtained. The initial MR imaging and sonographic studies were later correlated with the surgical-pathologic findings, follow-up evaluations, and diagnosis at the time of discharge. RESULTS: Surgical, histopathologic, and follow-up results revealed that 34 patients had appendicitis. Of the 26 patients without appendicitis, 15 with symptoms of acute appendicitis had no pathologic diagnoses and the remaining 11 had another diagnosis. Comparison of the sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive values for MR imaging and sonography was found to be statistically significant (p < .05, chi-square test), indicating that MR imaging was superior to sonography in revealing appendicitis. We found no statistical difference in specificity and positive predictive value for MR imaging and sonography. CONCLUSION: Despite some disadvantages, we found MR imaging to be superior to sonography in revealing suspected acute appendicitis. MR imaging can be used after suboptimal or nondiagnostic sonography in cases of suspected acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

The value of history-taking, physical examination, and computer assistance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients more than 50 years old.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients more than 50 years old was studied in connection with the Research Committee of the World Organization of Gastroenterology (OMGE) survey of acute abdominal pain. Criteria for inclusion and the diagnostic criteria in this prospective study were those set out by the OMGE Research Committee. METHODS: The clinical findings in each patient were recorded in detail, using a predefined structured data collection sheet, and the collected data were compared with the final diagnosis of the patients. Twenty-three preoperative clinical history variables, 14 clinical signs, and 3 tests were evaluated in a single variable and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis the most significant predictors of acute appendicitis in patients more than 50 years old were tenderness (relative risk (RR) = 39.4), rigidity (RR = 18.8), and pain at diagnosis (RR = 11.0). The sensitivity of the preoperative clinical decision is detecting acute appendicitis in the aged was 0.87, with a specificity of 0.92, an efficiency of 0.91 and a usefulness index (UI) of 0.69. The computer-aided diagnostic score (DS) reached a sensitivity of 0.92 in detecting acute appendicitis, with a specificity of 0.90 and an efficiency of 0.90. When the patients with a DS value between -0.47 and 0.07 were considered nondefined (n = 43, follow-up required before the decision to operate), the efficiency of the computer-aided diagnosis in detecting acute appendicitis in the aged improved to 0.97. In patients more than 50 years old whose body temperature was available (n = 374), tenderness, rigidity, location of pain at diagnosis, and body temperature predicted significantly acute appendicitis. At a cut-off level of -1.49 the diagnostic score reached a sensitivity of 0.94 in detecting acute appendicitis, with a specificity of 0.91, an efficiency of 0.92 and a UI of 0.80. When the patients with a DS value between -1.49 and 0.46 were considered nondefined (n = 43, follow-up required before the decision to operate), the sensitivity of the computer-aided diagnosis in detecting acute appendicitis in the aged was 0.92, with a specificity of 0.99 and an efficiency of 0.98, and the UI improved to 0.84. CONCLUSION: Acute abdominal pain at the right lower quadrant, with tenderness, rigidity, and increased body temperature (> or = 37.1 degrees C), is indicative of acute appendicitis in patients more than 50 years old. The diagnostic scoring system did perform well, increasing the sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and usefulness index of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the aged.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Fecal loading in the cecum as a new radiological sign of acute appendicitis.

AIM: Although the radiological features of acute appendicitis have been well documented, the value of plain radiography has not been fully appreciated. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of the association of acute appendicitis with images of fecal loading in the cecum. METHODS: Plain abdominal radiographs of 400 patients operated upon for acute appendicitis (n = 100), acute cholecystitis (n = 100), right acute pelvic inflammatory disease (n = 100) and right nephrolithiasis (n = 100) were assessed. The presence of fecal loading was recorded and the sensitivity and specificity of this sign for acute appendicitis were calculated. RESULTS: The presence of fecal loading in the cecum occurred in 97 patients with acute appendicitis, 13 patients with acute cholecystitis, 12 patients with acute inflammatory pelvic disease and 19 patients with nephrolithiasis. The sensitivity of this sign for appendicitis was 97% and its specificity to this disease was 85.3%. Its positive predictive value for appendicitis was 68.7%; however, its negative predictive value for appendicitis was 98.8%. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the presence of radiological images of fecal loading in the cecum may be a useful sign of acute appendicitis, and the absence of this sign probably excludes this disease. This is the first description of fecal loading as a radiological sign for acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.

The optimal initial treatment for perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to reliably distinguish between acute and perforated appendicitis. CT scanning has been shown to be highly accurate for the diagnosis of appendicitis, but it has not been specifically evaluated for perforated appendicitis. Our objective was to evaluate CT for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our study population comprised 84 patients who underwent appendectomy between 1993 and 1997 and who had CT scanning performed preoperatively. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. CT scans were reviewed in a blinded fashion. CT findings were correlated with pathologic and clinical factors. Sixteen patients with acute appendicitis, 59 patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, and 9 patients with normal appendices or other diagnoses were evaluated. For patients with pathologic documentation of appendicitis, CT findings that independently predict perforation or gangrene included abscess (P<0.001), phlegmon (P<0.001), extraluminal gas (P = 0.01), and terminal ileal wall thickening (P = 0.03). CT findings of an abscess, extraluminal gas, or phlegmon have a sensitivity of 92 per cent, specificity of 88 per cent, positive predictive value of 96 per cent, and negative predictive value of 74 per cent for perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. We conclude that CT can reliably distinguish between acute and perforated appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Spot urine 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid and acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Appendectomy for suspected appendicitis cases is a common procedure. Its clinical diagnosis needs to be supported by accurate confirmatory tests. No single paraclinical test with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity is available for its diagnosis. The appendix contains numerous serotonin-producing cells (enterochromaffin cells). In the inflammatory process and subsequent cell injury, serotonin is released and converted to 5-HIAA (5-hydroxy indole acetic acid). We studied the elevation of 5-HIAA in the spot urine of acute appendicitis patients. METHODOLOGY: 5-HIAA was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in the spot urine samples of 40 healthy individuals and 166 patients who presented to emergency units of the university hospitals with acute abdominal pain. The results of the urine concentrations were compared to the histopathology reports of the removed appendices and the final diagnosis of other diseases. RESULTS: From 80 cases with a presumptive diagnosis of appendicitis, 73 were operated on and seven cases discharged after a few hours observation. Sixty-five out of 66 documented appendicitis patients showed a striking increase of urinary spot 5-HIAA with significant differences vs. all cases of healthy control individuals (P < 0.001). The 5-HIAA values of all of the negative appendectomy cases (n = 7) and all of the discharged cases after the observation period (n = 7) were within healthy control ranges. The mean value of the appendicitis group (42.76 +/- 2.26 mumol/L) was also significantly higher vs. all other acute abdomens which could mimic acute appendicitis (P < 0.05) excepting gastroenteritis patients. Considering 20 mumol/L as the cutoff value sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of this test for discriminating appendicitis in clinically suspected patients were 98%, 100%, 100% and 93%, respectively and in all acute abdomens were 98%, 71%, 69% and 98.6%, respectively. The patients with gastroenteritis also showed elevation of 5-HIAA (43.05 +/- 2.7 mumol/L) vs. other nonappendicitis groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have concluded that measurement of 5-HIAA in spot urine is a highly reliable test supporting the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis and if it does not show an increase, appendicitis can be ruled out with a very high degree of confidence which helps to reduce unnecessary appendectomies. In clinically suspected appendicitis patients with diarrhea, an increase of 5-HIAA may not confirm the diagnosis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical analysis of the related factors in acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: In order to determine reliable clues for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis, this study was conducted to examine the related factors in patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 282 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis at China Medical College Hospital in Taiwan from January to December 2000. To study the significant related factors of acute appendicitis, the t-test, chi-square analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: There were 153 males (54.3 percent) and 129 females (45.7 percent). The mean age was 30.3+/-17.4 years (range 1 to 81). The diagnostic rate of acute appendicitis was 86.2 percent. If the combination of elevated C-reactive protein, leukocytosis and elevated neutrophil ratio was used, satisfactory specificity and positive predictive value were achieved in diagnosing acute appendicitis. After controlling for the other covariates, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significant related factors of acute appendicitis were male sex (odds ratio = 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval = 1.6 to 7.3; p <0.01) and elevated neutrophil ratio (odds ratio = 4.6; 95 percent confidence interval = 2.0 to 10.6; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: If an elevated neutrophil ratio was observed, the probability of acute appendicitis was increased in patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Thus, neutrophil ratio appears to be a good parameter for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in primary healthcare settings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Observation and repeated examination may lead to favourable clinical outcomes in the ever-challenging diagnosis of appendicitis. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical performance in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in a centre with limited access to medical imaging technologies and to identify factors associated with complicated cases. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of 211 consecutive surgical cases of suspected appendicitis, spanning an 11-year period, was performed. The delays before treatment and the subsequent patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 8.1% of cases with negative findings on appendectomy, 75.8% with uncomplicated appendicitis, 12.3% with complicated appendicitis and 3.8% with other surgical conditions. The delay before the first medical consultation was significantly longer in patients with complicated appendicitis. The various delays after the first medical consultation did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of limited available medical imaging modalities, clinical observation was not associated with an increased incidence of complicated appendicitis. The presence of complicated appendicitis was associated with the delay before the patient's first medical consultation. Clinical judgment can be prioritized and can lead to good clinical performance in the management of patients with suspected appendicitis, with no significant increase in rates of complicated appendicitis and negative findings on appendectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis in surgical indication.

The visualization rate and cross section width of the appendix were compared with the severity of appendicitis by using ultrasonography in 77 patients with acute appendicitis. An appendicitis echo was obtained in 100% of phlegmonous and gangrenous appendicitis cases in which emergency surgery was indicated, but in only 32% of catarrhal appendicitis cases in which conservative therapy was generally indicated. The cross section width of the appendix was 19.00 +/- 2.76 mm in gangrenous appendicitis, 15.22 +/- 3.73 mm in phlegmonous appendicitis and 9.50 +/- 1.76 mm in catarrhal appendicitis; i.e. the severer the inflammation the longer the diameter (p less than 0.01). A fluid echo, which suggests the existence of a complication, was observed in patients with gangrenous and phlegmonous appendicitis. The above facts suggest that ultrasonographic examination can be useful in assessing the severity of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗