SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “generalization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Pap smears in general practice: a secondary analysis of the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990 to 1991.

We investigated the characteristics of Australian general practice that predict performance of Pap smears by secondary analysis of the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990 to 1991. Chi-squared analysis identified potential associations between Pap smear rate and patient, doctor and practice variables. Significant associations were examined using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations. Participants were 495 general practitioners who collected information on 113,468 doctor-patient encounters, of which 43,211 encounters involved females aged 18 to 70 years. Pap smear encounter (2449) were identified and classified as patient-requested (62 per cent), diagnostic (5 per cent) or opportunistic (33 per cent). The large difference in the unadjusted Pap smear rates per 100 female encounters for female general practitioners (11.7) and male general practitioners (4.2) required separate analysis by sex of the general practitioner. For male general practitioners, a Pap smear was less likely: as patient age increased; for new patients; for general practitioners with less general practice experience; for general practitioners with no postgraduate qualifications; with metropolitan practice location; and if the practice had more than 25 per cent of patients with English as a second language. For female general practitioners, a Pap smear was less likely: for older known patients; as the age of the general practitioners increased; and for management of fewer problems per 100 encounters. A Pap smear was less likely to be opportunistic: as patient age increased; for general practitioners who were Australian graduates; and for general practitioners with no postgraduate qualifications. Consideration of patient, doctor, and general practice characteristics may facilitate the design of interventions to improve cervical cancer screening.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Worklife and satisfaction of general internists.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have reported relatively low job satisfaction for general internists. We used data from a large US physician survey to assess correlates of satisfaction of general internists. METHODS: The Physician Worklife Survey was mailed to a national random stratified sample of 5704 US physicians. General internists were assessed for their satisfaction, training, patient mix, work hours, the likelihood of recommending their specialty to medical students, and job stability. We then compared them with a specialist sample (internal medicine subspecialists [IMSSs]) and a primary care sample (family physicians [FPs]). Logistic regression was used to model predictors of satisfaction, stress, and medical student recruitment. RESULTS: There were 2326 respondents (adjusted response rate, 52%): 450 (19%) were general internists; 502 (22%), FPs; and 438 (19%), IMSSs. General internists were less satisfied than were IMSSs with their relationships with colleagues and with patient care issues (P<.01 for both) and less satisfied than were FPs with community ties (P =.001). Global job, career, and specialty satisfaction were significantly lower for general internists vs FPs and IMSSs (P<.05). General internists spent proportionately more of their work week in the hospital than did FPs (20% vs 13%; P<.001) and more time providing outpatient care than did IMSSs (56% vs 42%; P<.001). General internists had more patients with complex medical and psychosocial problems than did FPs (P<.01) but fewer patients with complex medical problems than did IMSSs (P<.001). Higher satisfaction for general internists was associated with older physician age, less time pressure during office visits, fewer work hours, and fewer patients with complex psychosocial problems (P<.05 for all). General internists were less likely than were FPs to recommend their specialty to medical students (P<.001). Specialty satisfaction, female gender, and control of hassles predicted medical student recruitment by general internists. CONCLUSIONS: General internists' role of caring for patients with complex problems is associated with lower levels of satisfaction than for IMSSs and FPs. Adjusting caseload for patient complexity, expanding time for office visits, and additional training in the care of patients with psychosocially complex problems may improve the job satisfaction of general internists and medical student recruitment into the specialty.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Combined epidural and general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

The hypothesis that combined epidural and light general anesthesia for infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery is associated with a more stable intraoperative course and less postoperative morbidity than general anesthesia alone was tested. The authors compared intraoperative hemodynamic variables and postoperative morbidity between a group with combined epidural and general anesthesia (n = 30) and a group with general anesthesia (n = 19). Patients who had combined epidural and general anesthesia were given epidural bupivacaine intraoperatively and epidural morphine postoperatively. After cross-clamping of the aorta, cardiac index and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure did not change in the group with combined epidural and general anesthesia, whereas cardiac index decreased (mean change, 0.30 L/min/m2; P = 0.0006) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased (mean change, 1 mm Hg; P = 0.007) in the group with general anesthesia. After unclamping, cardiac index increased in both groups (mean change, 0.26 L/min/m2, P = 0.002, and 0.30 L/min/m2, P = 0.001, respectively). Postoperatively, the necessity for ventilatory support and the incidence of respiratory failure were lower in the combined epidural and general anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.018, respectively). In addition, vasodilator therapy was required less frequently in the group with combined epidural and general anesthesia (P = 0.002). Duration of intensive care unit stay was shorter in the combined epidural and general anesthesia group (2.7 days v 3.8 days, P = 0.003). These data indicate that for infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery, combined epidural and general anesthesia is associated with more stable intraoperative hemodynamics and significantly less postoperative morbidity than general anesthesia alone.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The "myths" of low back pain: status quo in norwegian general practitioners and physiotherapists.

BACKGROUND: In 2001, several myths of low back pain still were alive in the general population in Norway, myths that were not in concordance with current guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To investigate perceptions about back pain in Norwegian general practitioners and physiotherapists and to compare these with perceptions in the general population. METHODS: During June 2001, 436 general practitioners (mean age 44.8, range 26-69 years) and 311 physiotherapists (mean age 47.6, range 25-70) were asked to rate their agreement with 7 statements, corresponding to Deyo's 7 myths that formulate 7 common misbeliefs on back pain. The corresponding data from the general population of 807 individuals (mean age 45.5, range 25-70) were sampled during early spring 2001. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the general population, general practitioners, and physiotherapists for all myths, the general population being more likely to agree with all myths. The differences were maintained even after controlling for educational level in the general population. There were no differences between general practitioners and physiotherapists except for the myths "radiographs and newer imaging tests can always identify the cause of pain" and "back pain is usually disabling," whereas general practitioners were less likely to disagree with the myths. Few gender and age differences were found in the professional groups. CONCLUSION: In Norwegian general practitioners and physiotherapists, Deyo's 7 myths mostly seem to be dead and buried. However, it does not seem that this has extended to the public yet, as many myths still are alive in the general population.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Integrated care for patients with asthma: views of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: In 1989, a shared or integrated care scheme was developed for hospital outpatients with asthma, using the computerized patient record system of Grampian Health Board, Scotland. Patients with asthma attending hospital clinics were entered into this scheme and were invited to attend their general practitioner instead of an outpatient clinic for review of their asthma. Three-monthly questionnaires covering clinical aspects of asthma were sent to these patients and their general practitioners; the latter then returned them to the specialist. Patients could be recalled to the hospital clinic if either the general practitioner or consultant felt this was necessary and all patients were reviewed after one year by the specialist. The success of integrated care for patients with asthma relies on the cooperation of general practitioners. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate how this scheme worked in general practice, and general practitioners' perceptions of it, in order to identify factors that enhance or inhibit integrated care for patients with asthma in general practice. METHOD: A qualitative survey was carried out with a random, stratified sample of 38 of the 317 general practitioners in the region. Semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit general practitioners' accounts of their operation of integrated care and their attitudes towards the scheme. RESULTS: General practitioners perceived the scheme to have several advantages: the continuity and quality of care provided was improved; and the transmission of information between general practitioner and specialist was enhanced. Regular general practitioner reviews, instigated by standard letters generated by computer, were favoured as being clearly structured. Concerns were raised about the processing of paperwork, and the possibility that unnecessary reviews might be generated. CONCLUSION: Integrated care for asthma patients is an acceptable management option among general practitioners.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

The role of counsellors in general practice. A qualitative study.

Counselling services in general practice are now widespread but little is known about their nature or role. We therefore carried out in-depth telephone interviews with a representative sample of 72 general practitioners and 60 of their counsellors who had participated in a previous national survey of counselling services in England and Wales. Our aim was to gain greater insight into the functioning of these services in order to determine the most appropriate focus for future research and development. Interviews were semi-structured and focused on service initiation and duration; counsellors' background and training; working arrangements including sources of funding; types of clients; communication between general practitioners and counsellors; perceived advantages and disadvantages to general practitioners, counsellors, and clients; goals, barriers, and proposed changes. Approximately two thirds of counsellors were employed by district health authorities and attached to practices. One third were employed by the practice with the financial assistance of family health services authorities. Practice-employed counsellors appeared a relatively new service innovation whose growth was facilitated by the general practitioner contract of 1991. Practice-employed counsellors were preferred to practice-attached staff in that general practitioners had greater control over the selection of counsellors and their working arrangements. Problems with interprofessional communication were noted in relation to counsellors' wishes to maintain patient confidentiality by not exchanging information about patients with general practitioners. Counsellors received referrals principally from general practitioners and occasionally from other primary health care staff. Self-referral by patients was rare. The problems for which patients were most commonly referred were: stress/anxiety, relationship problems, depression, and bereavement. The principal therapeutic styles were Rogerian counselling, behavioural therapy, and psychodynamic psychotherapy. A quarter described their style as 'eclectic'. Individual, not group, therapy was the norm. Sessions were usually 50 minutes in duration. However, waiting list times, the frequency of sessions, and overall duration of therapy varied enormously. Overall 28% of counsellors held no formal qualification in counselling or in any of the psychotherapies. Counsellors and general practitioners were generally satisfied with the service and identified a wide range of benefits with few disadvantages. The principal problem was said to be that demand exceeded capacity and the principal change proposed was expansion of the service. The findings provide the most comprehensive account to date of the present state and likely future direction of counselling services in general practice and point to the need to: 1. Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of counselling in the management of common psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and depression 2. Establish a national policy for the training and accreditation of counsellors working in general practice settings 3. Educate general practitioners about the organization and role of counselling services with particular attention to interprofessional communication and the maintenance of patient confidentiality.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1998

The general practitioner's role in breast cancer screening: a survey in Otago-Southland.

AIMS: To study the experience of general practitioners in Otago and Southland with the existing breast cancer screening programme and the reviews on future programmes. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 210 general practitioners in Otago and Southland in June 1996. RESULTS: The response rate was 71%. All the 141 respondents except one encouraged eligible women to take part in the programme; this was done mainly during individual doctor-patient consultations, by pamphlets and posters, and in the work of the practice nurse. Ten percent of practitioners had a practice-based recall system for breast cancer screening. Seventy-five percent of general practitioners currently provide a list of eligible women to the programme, and of these, 52% check the list to exclude ineligible women. Only 24% of practitioners supplying a patient list to the programme reported that a patient had ever requested that their name be excluded from the list. Twenty-five percent of general practitioners providing lists had a notice in the waiting room stating that. Of those who did not provide lists, concerns about logistics, ethical issues and cost were raised, although 40% of these general practitioners intended to provide lists in the future. In a future programme, 57% of general practitioners felt they should be paid for supplying lists defined by age only and 82% felt they should be paid for supplying a list of women eligible by both age and medical history. Most general practitioners felt that general practitioner lists were the preferred source for invitations to the breast screening programme and that general practitioners had an important part in any future programme. Screening at the ages 50-64 (as currently proposed) is supported by 95% of general practitioners; in addition, 64% supported screening at ages 65-69. Only a minority of general practitioners supported screening at ages 40-49 or ages 70-74. Most general practitioners would offer screening to women under age 50 with either a strong or a weak family history, or even with a past history of a fibroadenoma. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that almost all general practitioners support breast cancer screening programmes and feel that they have an important role in future programmes. The majority support extension of the programme to ages 65-69, but not to ages 40-49. The majority support screening women with individual risk factors at ages under 50, although their responses show that better information on the importance of different risk factors is required.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1998

Paediatric dental general anaesthesia rates and dental caries regionally and in districts in the former north western region.

OBJECTIVE: To chart paediatric dental general anaesthesia activity following implementation of the Poswillo Report recommendations and to characterise the relationship between dmft/DMFT and rates of paediatric dental general anaesthesia. DESIGN: An ecological study, using results of the NHS dental epidemiological surveys and routine NHS activity data. SETTING: The general, community and hospital dental services. SUBJECTS: Former regional and district health authorities' residents. OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations between the regional and district rates of dental general anaesthesia and dmft/DMFT from the NHS dental epidemiology surveys. RESULTS: About half of all paediatric dental general anaesthetics are carried out in the General Dental Service. There were significant correlations between regional mean dmft/DMFT and under 18 combined dental general anaesthesia rates in 1991/2 and 1992/3. In the North West Region there were significant correlations between 0-4-year-old district dental general anaesthesia rates and dmft of 5-year-old children in 1989/90 (r = 0.45, P < 0.05) and 0-17-year-old district dental general anaesthesia rates and 12-year-old DMFT (r = 0.49, P < 0.05) in 1992/3. CONCLUSIONS: The number of paediatric dental general anaesthetics provided since the Poswillo Report was implemented (1991) has increased in the last two years (1993/4 and 1994/5). District rates of dental general anaesthesia bore little relation to dental need as measured by dmft/DMFT, except in 1989/90 for 5-year-old children and in 1992/3 for 12-year-old children. This suggests dental general anaesthesia is not provided in response to dental needs at a district health authority level.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Vascular surgery training in general surgery residency programs: the Canadian experience.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgery is traditionally considered a component of general surgery. There is growing evidence of improved patient outcome related to surgeon volume and vascular certification status. The American Board of Surgery in the United States, as well as until recently the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in Canada, requires that vascular surgery be considered an essential content area of general surgery training. This requirement is controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe experience and perceived competence in common vascular surgery procedures during general surgery residency training in Canada. METHODS: This web-based survey was conducted between January and June 2002. General surgery program directors (GSPDs), vascular surgeons involved in general surgery training programs (VSs), and senior general surgery residents (SRs) from the 13 English-speaking general surgery programs in Canada were surveyed. Questions were asked regarding which vascular surgery procedures are appropriate for general surgeons to perform, which procedures SRs are trained to perform, and which procedures SR intend to perform. RESULTS: The response rate was 62% for GSPDs, 57% for VSs, and 45% for SRs. Overall, 49% of SRs did not intend to perform any vascular procedures after training. GSPDs, VSs, and SRs indicated that most SRs should be and are trained to perform varicose vein surgery, leg amputation, and femoral embolectomy (P >.05). In addition, GSPDs, VSs, and SRs indicated that SRs should not be and are not trained to perform infrainguinal bypass grafting, carotid endarterectomy, or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (P >.05). There were significant differences with respect to ruptured AAA repair: 49% of SRs, 25% of PDs, and only 12% of VSs believe that general surgeons should be trained to perform ruptured AAA repair (P <.05). Overall, 76% of VSs believe SRs receive too little vascular training. CONCLUSION: There is similarity between GSPDs, VSs, and SRs with respect to vascular surgery training in Canadian general surgery programs. Vascular surgery training cannot be considered a component of general surgery. More rotations or fellowship training is required to become competent in management of common vascular surgery procedures. Perhaps this level of competence should not be an objective of general surgery training.

Canada↗

PubMed1998

GPs' motives for referrals to general hospitals: does access to GP hospital beds make any difference?

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the relative impact of medical and other situational motives on GP's decisions to refer patients to specialist care in a general hospital, and to assess whether having access to a GP hospital influences the decisions. METHODS: We carried out a prospective study of consecutive doctor-patient contacts during one week. The effects of main motives, medical, social/nursing, general hospital advice, distance from the nearest general hospital and access to GP hospitals on referral decisions were explored by logistic regression. The motives for different referral decisions were also explored through frequency analyses. The study was set in general practices in the county of Finnmark in North Norway, which included 40 GPs from rural practices with access to a GP hospital and eight GPs working closer to a general hospital without access to GP hospital. We studied 2496 doctor-patient contacts, which resulted in 411 patients being considered for any kind of referral, of which 205 were referred to the general hospital. RESULTS: Medical needs were recorded as the only referral motive of major importance in about half of the cases considered for referral, while additional motives were recorded in the other half. The rationale for admissions to general hospitals and GP hospitals (in-patient care) was compatible in terms of the relative importance of the medical arguments. The GP hospital option was mainly chosen because of the long distance from the general hospital, nursing needs and the preferences of the patient and the family, and resulted in a lower proportion of patients being referred to general hospitals from GPs with access to a GP hospital. CONCLUSION: Medical motives dominate the decision to refer patients to general hospitals, but access to a GP hospital, in cases where nursing needs and long distances to the general hospital are supplementary considerations, reduces the proportion of patients being referred to general hospitals.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Developing musculoskeletal education programs for physicians and the general public: findings from a needs assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational needs and learning preferences of primary care physicians and the general public in receiving musculoskeletal health education. METHODS: Prospective surveys were mailed simultaneously to 2,250 primary care physicians and 2,250 members of the general public. The surveys included questions about demographics, motivation for attending programs, and preferred education program formats. RESULTS: The 68 responding physicians attend continuing medical education programs mainly based on topics, speakers, and timing. They prefer lectures and find question and answer sessions least helpful in supporting learning. The 96 responding members of the general public attend programs mainly based on topics, speakers, and fees. The general public stated that question and answer sessions best support learning in programs. A large percentage of responding physicians provide health education to their patients, but a small percentage of the general public respondents stated that they receive health education from physicians. DISCUSSION: Responses from physicians and the general public were generally not surprising but revealed interesting contrasts between learning preferences. While physicians and the general public both value speakers and topics, the physicians want to increase their knowledge about disease, whereas the general public wants practical information. Physicians and the general public also appear to take different approaches to learning. The contrast between availability and provision of health education is also striking. We cannot generalize our results with absolute confidence because the return rates for the surveys were so low. Nonetheless, we support the need to educate physicians and the general public in ways that match their preferred learning methods and educational needs.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[Assessment of a general practitioner training campaign for early detection of cutaneous melanoma in the Haut-Rhin department of France].

INTRODUCTION: Dermatologists frequently provide training for general practitioners, but such training is not systematic and evaluation is rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A training campaign for general practitioners and occupational physicians in melanoma screening was carried out in the Haut-Rhin Department of France in 2004. The 630 general practitioners and 120 occupational physicians in this geographic department received repeated mail together with materials (posters and booklets) for their waiting rooms, and they were invited to attend medical training sessions. The sessions consisted of 10 photographs for initial evaluation, provision of epidemiological information, training in identification of subjects at risk and diagnosis of pigmented lesions, with a further 10 photographs for evaluation at the end. The 20 evaluation photographs were randomly selected for each session from 40 photographs comprising 18 cases of melanomas, 14 of nevi, 4 of basal cell carcinomas and 4 of seborrheic keratoses. At the end of each session, the physicians returned 2 anonymous questionnaires containing their overall assessment of the campaign (Q1) and their answers concerning the 20 evaluation photographs (proposed diagnosis and management strategy) (Q2). The questionnaires were then analyzed. The 40 evaluation photographs were also tested on 47 dermatologists. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty physicians - 278/630 general practitioners (44%) and 72/120 occupational physicians (60%) - attended 18 medical training sessions. Response levels for questionnaires Q1 and Q2 were 88% and 90% respectively. Almost all of the physicians involved considered the campaign to be warranted. At the end of the training sessions, 96% felt they were better equipped to identify subjects at risk for melanoma and 53% (58% of general practitioners and 39% of occupational physicians, p=0.03) felt they had greatly improved their ability to diagnose pigmented lesions. The median number of correct replies concerning the evaluation photographs increased from 6/10 to 7/10 between the initial evaluation photographs and the final evaluation photographs (p<0.0001), with no difference being seen between the general practitioners and occupational physicians. The median number of correct replies from the 47 dermatologists was 35/40 (8.75/10). The most striking improvement noted during the campaign concerned the ability to identify melanomas. The figure rose from an initial 59% at the start of the session (initial evaluation photographs) (versus 86% for the dermatologists) to 84% by the end of the session (final evaluation photographs) (p<0.0001). The management strategy proposed for photographs of melanoma (irrespective of the proposed diagnosis) was judged "appropriate" in 86% of cases at the start of the session versus 94% at the end of the session (p<0.001). Seborrheic keratosis was correctly identified in 43% of cases by the general practitioners/occupational physicians versus 75% by the dermatologists, and was confused with melanoma in 22% of cases by the general practitioners/occupational physicians versus 5% by the dermatologists. No improvement was seen during the training session in terms of the ability of the general practitioners/occupational physicians to correctly identify seborrheic keratosis. The majority of participants indicated their willingness to participate in the screening program and asked to receive information on melanoma on a regular basis. DISCUSSION: This initial study shows the immediate impact of medical training sessions on general practitioners/occupational physicians to be important in terms of sensitization and moderate but significant in terms of improved diagnosis of pigmented lesions. The longer term impact, as well as the impact of the campaign on physicians not taking part in the medical training sessions, remains unknown. This study militates in favor of the involvement of general practitioners and occupational physicians in mass screening for melanoma in collaboration with dermatologists. The 2004 campaign in the Haut-Rhin Department also included information for the general public. The primary evaluation criterion of the campaign will be change in incidence of thick melanomas recorded by the departmental cancer registry.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗

PubMed2001

Management of diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners in Victoria.

PURPOSE: To compare the self-reported management of diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. METHODS: In 1994, a stratified (by urban/rural practice location) sample of 500 general practitioners in Victoria was surveyed in regard to their management of diabetic retinopathy. Following the release of the NHMRC Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy in 1997, these same general practitioners were sent a two-page questionnaire related to their management of diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 228 general practitioners (59% of original participants). Only 37% (79/216) of the general practitioners reported that they had received a copy of the guidelines. Of the general practitioners who had received the guidelines, 18% (14/79) said that they had not read them at all, while 65% (51/79) had read them partially and 18% (14/79) had read them in their entirety. At follow up, less than half (98/214) of general practitioners reported examining 50% or more of their patients for diabetic retinopathy, compared with 104/214 at baseline. General practitioners who had read the guidelines were more likely to report that not being sure what to do when changes were detected was a minor barrier or was not a barrier to them performing dilated ophthalmoscopy (93% vs 83%, chi2(1) = 3.67, P = 0.055). Nearly all of the general practitioners reported that they refer their patients with diabetes to an ophthalmologist or optometrist at least every 2 years as recommended. Seventy-six per cent (170/224) of the general practitioners felt that 70% or more of their patients complied with their instructions to visit an ophthalmologist or optometrist. CONCLUSION: The NHMRC guidelines for diabetic retinopathy appear to have had a positive effect on some of the attitudes of general practitioners who have read them, but more effort is needed to disseminate the guidelines to all general practitioners and to increase their uptake.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗

PubMed2004

General practitioners' knowledge, confidence and attitudes in the diagnosis and management of dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To measure general practitioners' knowledge of, confidence with and attitudes to the diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care. SETTING: 20 general practices of varying size and prior research experience in Central Scotland, and 16 similarly varied practices in north London. PARTICIPANTS: 127 general practitioners who had volunteered to join a randomised controlled trial of educational interventions about dementia diagnosis and management. METHODS: Self-completion questionnaires covering knowledge, confidence and attitudes were retrieved from practitioners prior to the educational interventions. RESULTS: General practitioners' knowledge of dementia diagnosis and management is good, but poor awareness of its epidemiology leads to an over-estimate of caseload. Knowledge of local diagnostic and support services is less good, and one third of general practitioners expressed limited confidence in their diagnostic skills, whilst two-thirds lacked confidence in management of behaviour and other problems in dementia. The main difficulties identified by general practitioners were talking with patients about the diagnosis, responding to behaviour problems and coordinating support services. General practitioners perceived lack of time and lack of social services support as the major obstacles to good quality care more often than they identified their own unfamiliarity with current management or with local resources. Attitudes to the disclosure of the diagnosis, and to the potential for improving the quality of life of patients and carers varied, but a third of general practitioners believed that dementia care is within a specialist's domain, not that of general practice. More experienced and male general practitioners were more pessimistic about dementia care, as were general practitioners with lower knowledge about dementia. Those reporting greater difficulty with dementia diagnosis and management and those with lower knowledge scores were also less likely to express attitudes endorsing open communication with patient and carer. CONCLUSION: Educational support for general practitioners should concentrate on epidemiological knowledge, disclosure of the diagnosis and management of behaviour problems in dementia. The availability and profile of support services, particularly social care, need to be enhanced, if earlier diagnosis is to be pursued as a policy objective in primary care.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

The development of general practice in China.

The concepts and principles of general practice are consistent with Chinese cultural values; the leading authorities at the General Practice Training Centre are extremely enthusiastic about the general practice movement; the Ministry of Public Health is totally supportive of the general practice training; the medical/allied health professionals are eager to participate in general practice activities; and general practice certainly is responsive to public expectations. General practice will be flourishing and prosperous in China; however, there may be times when the specialty of general practice in China experiences growing pains with obstacles. The experiences gained from the development of general practice training programmes in Taiwan and other countries to handle the obstacles are of tremendous value to the development of general practice in China. It is expected that communication and exchange between the general practice educators of Taiwan and China will play an important role in the further development of general practice in China.

China↗

PubMed1989

Patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction with information given on discharge from hospital: audit of a new information card.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the attitudes of patients discharged from hospital and their general practitioners to a new information card giving details about admission, diagnosis, and treatment and to assess the completeness of the information on the card. DESIGN: Consecutive patients discharged from the care of three consultant physicians over 16 weeks. SETTING: One general medical ward in a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 275 consecutive discharges of 258 patients were studied. The mean age of patients was 60 years and mean duration of admission five days. INTERVENTION: At discharge from the ward all study patients received an information card and a copy of the card in the form of an interim discharge letter to be delivered to their general practitioner. Patients and general practitioners were asked to complete a questionnaire giving their views on the legibility, helpfulness, quality, and quantity of the information they received. Copies of all the information cards were scrutinised for completeness. MAIN RESULTS: The results were based on 208 (76%) forms returned by patients and 214 (78%) forms returned by general practitioners. Information was considered very helpful or quite helpful according to 170 (83%) forms from patients and 197 (92%) forms from general practitioners; sufficient information was provided according to 160 and 182 forms. Most patients and nearly all general practitioners thought it was a good idea to provide this information for patients at discharge. According to 125 forms from patients and 188 from general practitioners the information card was very easy or quite easy to read; 155 patients had read it at least twice and 149 were likely to refer to it again. OTHER RESULTS: The written information about the patient, the diagnosis, and what the patient had been told was generally well completed, although the date of discharge was omitted from 42 (15%) cards. Details of drugs prescribed at discharge were generally thorough. CONCLUSIONS: Giving an information card to all patients at discharge was feasible and favoured by most patients and their general practitioners. Having made minor changes in design, we think that we have produced an information card that is a convenient size and will improve communication between patients, their general practitioners, and hospital doctors. We now issue this card routinely to all patients discharged from our ward and hope that it might be widely adopted.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1990

General practitioner response to elderly patients discharged from hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of discharge information given to general practitioners on their management of newly discharged elderly patients. DESIGN: A random sample of 133 elderly patients who had unplanned readmission to a district general hospital within 28 days of discharge was compared with a matched control sample of patients who were not readmitted. Information was gathered from the hospital, the patients, the carers, and the general practitioners about the information that the hospital had sent the general practitioner and the general practitioners' response to this information. SETTING: All specialties in a district general hospital. PATIENTS: 266 Patients aged over 65 representative in the main demographic indices of the population of elderly patients admitted to hospital. RESULTS: Ten weeks after discharge the doctors had received notice of discharge about 169 of the patients, but fewer than half the discharge notices were received within the first week. General practitioners were dissatisfied with the information in 60 cases. A general practitioner visited 174 of the patients after their discharge from hospital and three quarters of the visits took place within two weeks of the discharge. These visits were more likely to have been initiated by patients or families than by the doctor, and this was not influenced by the doctor receiving notice of the patient's discharge. Older patients and those who had carers were the most likely to be visited. Nearly half of the carers were dissatisfied with some aspect of general practitioner care, problems with home visiting being the commonest source of complaint. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital communications to general practitioners about the discharge of elderly patients still cause concern, particularly in the time they take to arrive. Written instruction to vulnerable elderly patients asking them to inform their general practitioner of the discharge might be helpful. Carers complained of lack of support, and it is clearly important for someone (either the general practitioner or another health worker) to visit elderly people shortly after their discharge.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Preregistration house officers in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain from house officers who had rotated through general practice in their pre-registration year their views about their experience; and, separately, to compare the overall hours and type of work performed by hospital based and general practice based house officers. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire; and self recording of working hours and duties during four consecutive weeks. SETTING: Inner London teaching hospital and nearby general practice. PARTICIPANTS: 28 preregistration house officers in general practice, 1981-91; and 12 preregistration house officers, four each in medicine, surgery, and general practice. RESULTS: 26 out of 28 questionnaires were returned (response rate 93%). Twelve respondents were following or thinking of following a career in general practice. Twenty five respondents were satisfied with the clinical and educational aspects of the general practice rotation and would recommend the rotation, and 25 thought four months was about the right length of time in general practice. With regard to hours and type of work performed, hospital based house officers worked on average 55.5 hours a week (excluding on call), with an average of 12.5 hours (22.5%) spent in clinical activities; general practice based house officers worked about 41 hours a week, of which 24 hours (58%) were in clinical activities. House officers in hospital received less than one hour's specific teaching a week; those in general practice received nearly three hours' a week. CONCLUSIONS: A preregistration rotation in general practice is a popular alternative to the hospital based rotation. Although this is a limited study, other medical schools should consider introducing general practice options for preregistration house officers.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗