Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “TOOTH DISCOLORATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Analytical electron microscopy of chlorhexidine-induced tooth stain in humans: direct evidence for metal-induced stain.

Using analytical electron microscopy, we directly tested the hypothesis that transition metals and sulfur are the cause of chlorhexidine-induced tooth stain. Plaque scraped from the teeth of water-treated individuals or chlorhexidine-treated "non-stainers" was non- or lightly-stained and contained low concentrations of sulfur and transition metals. Tooth scrapings from heavily-staining chlorhexidine-treated individuals consisted of distinct unstained and stained regions. The stained regions were organic but were in close proximity to mineralized areas. Enhanced levels of sulfur and transition metals, particularly iron, were found in stained regions, whereas unstained regions contained low sulfur and metal levels similar to the water-treated or non-staining individuals. Excluding decreased mineralization, the major elemental change in heavily-stained plaque was an increase in sulfur, and to a lesser extent, iron and other transition metals. Sulphur and iron levels were directly correlated. Following chlorhexidine treatment with iron supplementation, staining was enhanced, the Fe/S ratio increased, and sulfur and iron remained correlated. These data support the hypothesis that transition metals and sulfur are the cause of chlorhexidine-induced tooth stain. The data are consistent with chlorhexidine treatment altering the incorporation into plaque of a natural sulfur-containing organic component of saliva or bacteria. This natural component appears to readily interact with transition metals, particularly iron, producing stained material.

Chlorhexidine↗
PubMed2005

An in vitro model of chlorhexidine-induced tooth staining.

BACKGROUND: Tooth staining is a common feature of chlorhexidine treatment for periodontal disease and there is a large variation between patients as to the degree of their tooth staining. Although the mechanism of tooth staining is uncertain, diet, smoking and oral hygiene appear probable factors. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the role of saliva in chlorhexidine-induced tooth staining and used tea as the staining agent in an in vitro model with hydroxyapatite mimicking teeth. METHODS: Saliva has been used to create an acquired pellicle and in solution to mimic its effects in vivo. Using different combinations of tea, chlorhexidine and parotid saliva, substances binding to hydroxyapatite were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Using this system, tea, chlorhexidine and salivary proteins were clearly identifiable following staining by Coomassie Brilliant Blue. RESULTS: The results indicated that tea interacted with many salivary proteins, in particular proline-rich proteins and histatins. Chlorhexidine did not appear to complex with or precipitate salivary proteins nor prevent the formation of an acquired pellicle on the hydroxyapatite. In isolation, tea and chlorhexidine bound in small amounts to hydroxyapatite, but when added in combination, binding of both to hydroxyapatite was greatly increased. The acquired pellicle reduced chlorhexidine and tea binding, but conversely increased the binding of either tea or chlorhexidine alone to hydroxyapatite. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, salivary proteins play an important role in the staining process and the combination of tea and chlorhexidine appears to be a very potent staining factor.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1998

A quantitative comparison of traditional and non-peroxide bleaching agents.

Single-rooted premolar teeth, stained with blood utilizing the technique devised by Freccia & Peters (1981), were subjected to traditional and non-peroxide bleaching agents. Colour changes were recorded over a period of 7 days using a Speedmaster R75-CP Reflection Densitometer. The most efficient removal of staining occurred after the application of 30% hydrogen peroxide, with sodium perborate being 75% as effective. All bleaching agents realized their optimum efficacy within the first 3 days. A combination of three enzymes (amylase, lipase and trypsin) with disodium edetate was not as effective as the routine bleaching agents; however, the combination did have a modifying effect on the blood stains. It is suggested that other non-peroxide agents should be investigated to determine their efficacy in removing staining from experimentally induced blood-stained teeth.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Diagnostic characteristics of pulpal blood flow levels associated with adverse outcomes of luxated permanent maxillary incisors.

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a non-invasive method to assess pulpal blood flow (PBF). Dental injury has been associated with significant PBF reduction. The purpose of this study was (i) to describe PBF characteristics of teeth with specific clinical outcomes, and (ii) to demonstrate diagnostic characteristics for different threshold PBF values for detection of specific multiple adverse outcomes. In 80 trauma patients, a single maxillary incisor treated by repositioning and splinting, and the respective contralateral homologous control tooth were investigated by LDF to assess local PBF values. Perfusion units (PU) were taken in two sessions, on the day of splint removal (session I), and 12 weeks after splint removal (session II). The ability of session II-related PBF measurements at 2.9, 6.4 and 9.9 PU levels to identify adverse outcomes occurring 36 weeks after splint removal was investigated. Adverse outcomes were classified as type I (loss of sensitivity), type II (periapical radiolucency), type III (grey discolouration), type IV (loss of sensitivity and periapical radiolucency), and type V (loss of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency and grey discolouration of crown). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PBF assessments. There was a significant increase in PBF values from session I to session II (P=0.0001) for teeth without an adverse outcome, while teeth affected by a type II-V outcome showed a significant decrease in PBF values (P <0.05). PBF measurements did not change over time for the contralateral incisors (P >0.05). A type IV and V outcome occurred in 21 and 24% of the instances, respectively. The PBF of 2.9 PU demonstrated a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 93% for type V outcomes. The best likelihood ratio was found for the PBF 2.9 PU level and incisors associated with a type V outcome. The data suggest that the LDF test to be a valuable diagnostic adjunct for luxated teeth showing signs of adverse outcomes including grey discolouration or a combination of other signs. However, it may also become necessary to apply clinical decision-making methods in order to correctly evaluate the value of information gathered. The clinical implication is that LDF may become useful in the prediction of adverse outcomes at a much earlier time period than may be accomplished by standard sensitivity tests.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Plaque formation and gingivitis after supervised mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride, 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo for 6 months.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, 6-month clinical trial with parallel group design in 162 patients with gingivitis divided into three rinsing groups was conducted in order to study the efficacy and safety of a flavoured solution of delmopinol hydrochloride 2 mg ml-1 (0.2% w/v, Decapinol Mouthwash) used for supervised mouthrinsing in one rinsing group, in comparison with chlorhexidine digluconate 2 mg ml-1 (0.2% w/v, Hibitane Dental) in a second rinsing group, and placebo in the third group. The criteria of the Plaque Index (PI) were used to assess plaque formation. Bleeding on probing (BOP) to the bottom of the pocket with a standard pressure was used as the primary gingivitis assessment. The occurrence of supragingival dental calculus and extrinsic tooth staining were also assessed. In addition, patients were asked to report adverse events at each visit. RESULTS: Delmopinol and chlorhexidine exhibited lower scores of the mean PI and the BOP percentage than placebo, both at the 3-month and 6-month examinations. Furthermore, both active solutions showed a higher extent of staining of the teeth than placebo during these two observation periods. Rinsing with chlorhexidine resulted in more dental calculus than placebo after 6 months. Chlorhexidine showed lower scores for plaque formation and gingivitis development but higher scores of supragingival dental calculus (after 6 months) and tooth staining than did delmopinol. Both active solutions were reported by the patients--approximately to the same extent but more frequently than placebo--to induce taste alterations and a transient anaesthetic sensation of the oral mucosa. However, subjective staining of the teeth and tongue was reported by 16% of the delmopinol patients, but by 86% of the patients rinsing with chlorhexidine for 6 months. Furthermore, 24% of the patients in the chlorhexidine group, 9% in the delmopinol group and 4% in the placebo group wished to withdraw from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this clinical trial indicate that supervised rinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride or with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate twice daily for 60 s as a supplement to normal mechanical oral hygiene procedures resulted in less plaque formation and gingivitis than rinsing with placebo. Although chlorhexidine was more effective than delmopinol regarding plaque formation and gingivitis, it was considered by the patients as less tolerable.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Clinical studies to determine the effectiveness of a whitening toothpaste at reducing stain (using a forced stain model).

AIMS: Two single centre, randomized single-blind, crossover studies were performed, to compare the effect of a test toothpaste with a conventional fluoride paste in the inhibition and removal of extrinsic dental stain promoted by repeated chlorhexidine/tea rinses. METHODS: These studies used 24 subjects in each of two separate clinical trials. On the Friday before each trial period, the subjects received a prophylaxis to remove all staining, plaque and calculus deposits. On the following Monday, subjects were checked whether they were stain free and then under direct supervision they rinsed with a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse, immediately followed by a rinse with a warm black tea solution. This cycle was repeated hourly eight times throughout the day and on the following days until the Friday. In addition subjects also received daily a single toothpaste slurry rinse or control water rinse in the morning and lunchtime. No other form of oral hygiene was permitted during this period. On the Friday, both stain area and intensity was assessed using the Lobene Stain Index. For the stain removal study, stain was promoted again using chlorhexidine and tea rinses. After 4 days, stain was measured both prior to and immediately after brushing with the allocated toothpaste for 2 min. Subjects were then instructed to use the toothbrush at home according to their normal oral hygiene practices. On the following Wednesday, the amount of stain present was re-assessed. Each subject subsequently received a thorough prophylaxis to remove all plaque calculus and staining before starting the following periods of the study. RESULTS: The study showed no difference in the ability of the test whitening toothpaste, control toothpaste and water control at inhibiting stain. There was also only a small difference (3.5% for product of area and intensity) between the ability of the two toothpastes to help remove stain after a single brushing. The difference was however in favour of the test product which approached a conventional level of significance (P = 0.089). There was no evidence of superiority for either of the pastes after normal home usage. CONCLUSIONS: This study has suggested that the test product may have some advantage over the conventional paste at removing stain but the magnitude of difference would appear to be small and of little clinical relevance.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A non-staining chlorhexidine mouthwash? Probably not: a study in vitro.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tooth staining is a common side effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinses and caused by the interaction of the di-cationic antiseptic with dietary chromogens. A product is now available, which claims an anti-discolouration system (ADS) with one clinical study in support. This study in vitro aims to determine whether two ADS rinses do or do not bind dietary chromogens. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Optically clear acrylic specimens were cycled through human saliva (2 min), one of the three chlorhexidine rinses (two ADS and a positive control) (2 min) or water and then soaked in tea (60 min). After each cycle the optical density (OD) of specimens were read on a UV/visible spectrophotometer. The exit point was the cycle at which OD was >2.0. RESULTS: All three rinses exceeded OD 2 at 11 cycles and there was no significant difference in staining for the ADS rinses compared with the positive control rinse. CONCLUSION: Based on extensive literature for the correlation of this test in vitro with chlorhexidine anti-plaque activity and propensity to stain in vivo these ADS rinses will have the same anti-plaque efficacy and potential to cause stain as established chlorhexidine rinse products.

Chlorhexidine↗
PubMed2006

Measurement of stain removal in vitro: a comparison of two instrumental methods.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare an established spectrophotometrical approach for the measurement of stain removal in vitro with a new digital image analysis system. METHOD: Eighteen acrylic blocks were stained by cycling them through human saliva (2 min), chlorhexidine (2 min) and tea (1 h), rinsed with deionized water and left to air dry. The absorbance of each block was then measured at 395 nm using a single-beam spectrophotometer. The lightness (L-value) of the stained blocks (after a baseline correction) was measured using digital image analysis. Image acquisition and L-values were obtained using Adobe Photoshop software. The stain removal ability of two whitening toothpastes and deionized water was tested by immersing each stained block in a test slurry (15 g paste/60 ml deionized water) for 1 min, rinsing and finally left to air dry. This cycle was repeated until the blocks had 5 min exposure to the slurry. Absorbance values from spectrophotometry and L-values by image analysis were obtained after each cycle. RESULTS: Fleiss' coefficient of reliability for intra-operator repeatability of the image analysis system and spectrophotometry was 0.999 for both methods which shows excellent reliability. Pearson's correlation coefficients for the two methods (stain build-up) were 0.976. Test products A, B and C gave correlations of 0.962, 0.998 and 0.817 respectively (stain removal), significant at the 0.01 level. CONCLUSION: The image system is a reliable alternative measurement method validated here against spectrophotometry for stain removal in vitro, and can provide full colour measurement.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2006

A comparison of two chlorhexidine gel brushing regimens and a conventional toothpaste brushing regimen for the development of tooth staining over a 6-week period.

AIMS: A single-centre, randomized single-blind parallel study was undertaken to compare staining seen with three brushing regimens and to determine subject perception of side effects such as staining and effects on taste. METHODS: This 6-week parallel study used 157 volunteers who were randomized into one of three treatment groups: (i) brushing in the morning and evening with a normal dose of a 1% chlorhexidine gel, (ii) brushing with a low dose of chlorhexidine gel in the evening and a whitening dentifrice in the morning, and (iii) brushing with a standard fluoride paste in the morning and evening. Following home usage of their allocated products, the study volunteers returned after 3 and 6 weeks to record the amount of stain present. After the 6-week period, subject perception of taste and stain acceptability was determined using a questionnaire. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of use of the low-dose chlorhexidine gel and whitening dentifrice, significantly more stain was seen compared with the use of a standard dentifrice (P<0.0001). Similarly, significantly more stain was seen with use of the normal-dose chlorhexidine gel compared with the low-dose gel and whitening dentifrice (P=0.0007). Approximately 30% of individuals on the low-dose chlorhexidine gel regimen found the amount of stain unacceptable and 10% noted an effect on their taste perception. CONCLUSIONS: The use of low dose of chlorhexidine gel at night and a whitening paste in the morning produced a significant amount of stain that 30% of subjects considered unacceptable.

Adult↗