Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reliability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Perceptual matching for assessment of itch; reliability and responsiveness analyzed by a rank-invariant statistical method.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and responsiveness of a new device-perceptual matching by Matcher (Cefar Medical AB, Lund, Sweden)-in the assessment of the progress of experimentally induced itch as well as determine the reliability of the method in patients with skin disease and itch. The perceptual matching unit electrically stimulates the skin of the fingers in the left hand. When the amplitude of the sensation corresponded to that of the experienced itch, the subject was instructed to halt the stimulation and a value was automatically saved in the electronic device. A total of 36 healthy subjects and nine patients participated in the study. The healthy subjects were asked to rate the level of itch every 30 s during the first 5 min and thereafter every minute. The reliability was determined in a test-retest procedure of the time points 5, 10, and 15 min after induction of itching. To test the stability of the method, the first sensation of pain in healthy subjects without itch was determined every 10th minute during 60 min. In patients, the test-retest procedure was repeated within 5 min. Perceptual matching was found to be a reliable method of itch assessment, with no evidence for random individual disagreement between the assessments. The augmented rank order coefficient ra was excellent: 1.00 at 5 min; 0.99 at 10 min; and 1.00 at 15 min. There was a clear indication of responsiveness for detecting changes in itch over time, p<or=0.05. The perceptual matcher device can detect immediate changes in perceived itch and is also sensitive to gradual decreases after the induction of itch. The first sensation of pain in healthy subjects without itch was unaffected when assessed every 10th minute during 60 min. In patients, no evidence for random disagreement or systematic disagreement by group between repeated assessments was detected. The augmented rank order coefficient was high (0.98). In conclusion, Matcher measures itch intensity via perceptual matching with a high reliability and excellent responsiveness. The method is stable and can be recommended as an assessment tool for itch intensity both in experimental conditions as well as in patients with skin disease and itch.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Reliability and validity of the Japanese Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of a Japanese translation of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire in a sample of Japanese patients with headache. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that the English-language version of the MIDAS Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of migraine-related disability. Any translations of the MIDAS Questionnaire must also be assessed for reliability and validity. METHODS: Study participants were recruited from the patient population attending either the Neurology Department of Kitasato University or an affiliated clinic. Participants were eligible for study entry if they had 6 or more primary headaches per year. For reliability testing, participants completed the MIDAS Questionnaire on 2 occasions, exactly 2 weeks apart. To assess validity, patients were also invited to participate in a 90-day daily diary study. Composite measures from the 90-day diaries were compared to equivalent MIDAS measures (ie, 5 questions on headache-related disability and 1 question each on average pain intensity and headache frequency in the last 3 months) and to the total MIDAS score obtained from a third MIDAS Questionnaire completed at the end of this 90-day period. RESULTS: One hundred one patients between the ages of 21 and 77 years were recruited (81 women and 20 men). Ninety-nine patients (80 women and 19 men) participated in the diary study. At baseline, 46.5% of patients were MIDAS grade I or II (minimal, mild, or infrequent disability), 22.2% were MIDAS grade III (moderate disability), and 31.3% were MIDAS grade IV (severe disability). Test-retest Spearman correlations for the 5 disability questions and the questions on average pain intensity and headache frequency ranged from 0.59 to 0.80 (P<.0001). The test-retest Spearman correlation coefficient for the total MIDAS score was 0.83 (P<.0001). The degree to which individual MIDAS questions correlated with the diary-based measures ranged from 0.36 to 0.88. The correlation between the total MIDAS score and the equivalent diary-based measure was 0.66. In general, the mean and median values for the MIDAS items and total MIDAS score were similar to the means and medians for the diary-based measures. However, the mean MIDAS scores for the number of days on which headache was experienced and the number of missed workdays were significantly different compared to the diary-based estimates for these items (P<.05). In addition, the mean MIDAS score for the number of days of missed housework was significantly higher than the corresponding diary-based estimate (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that the Japanese translation of the MIDAS Questionnaire is comparable with the English-language version in terms of reliability and validity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm (ARA) test, to assess its ability to detect a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 5.7 points, and to identify less reliable test items. DESIGN: Intrarater reliability of the sum scores and of individual items was assessed by comparing (1) the ratings of the laboratory measurements of 20 patients with the ratings of the same measurements recorded on videotape by the original rater, and (2) the repeated ratings of videotaped measurements by the same rater. Interrater reliability was assessed by comparing the ratings of the videotaped measurements of 2 raters. The resulting limits of agreement were compared with the MCID. PATIENTS: Stratified sample, based on the intake ARA score, of 20 chronic stroke patients (median age, 62yr; median time since stroke onset, 3.6yr; mean intake ARA score, 29.2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (Spearman's rho); intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); mean difference and limits of agreement, based on ARA sum scores; and weighted kappa, based on individual items. RESULTS: All intra- and interrater Spearman's rho and ICC values were higher than .98. The mean difference between ratings was highest for the interrater pair (.75; 95% confidence interval, .02-1.48), suggesting a small systematic difference between raters. Intrarater limits of agreement were -1.66 to 2.26; interrater limits of agreement were -2.35 to 3.85. Median weighted kappas exceeded .92. CONCLUSION: The high intra- and interrater reliability of the ARA test was confirmed, as was its ability to detect a clinically relevant difference of 5.7 points.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Postural control in the elderly: an analysis of test-retest and interrater reliability of the COP-COM variable.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the test-retest and interrater reliability of the center of pressure-center of mass (COP-COM) variable of postural control in the elderly. DESIGN: The biomechanic variable COP-COM, which represents the distance between the COP and the COM, was determined from 2 AMTI force platforms and 3 OPTOTRAK position sensors. Measurements were taken in quiet position, double leg stance, and eyes open and eyes closed conditions. SETTING: Laboratory environment. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five healthy subjects, 8 patients with diabetes neuropathy, and 7 stroke survivors, all of whom were at least 60 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were evaluated on 2 separate occasions within 7 days by the same evaluator to determine test-retest reliability. Interrater reliability was determined the same day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The biomechanic variable COP-COM, which represents the distance between the COP and the COM in terms of root mean square. The mean of 4 trials of the COP-COM variable for each condition was used for statistical analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used. RESULTS: The COP-COM variable has good reliability for both the test-retest and interrater studies, but its reliability varies according to the direction of the COP-COM. For the test-retest and interrater studies, the ICC ranged from.89 to.93 in the anteroposterior direction and from.74 to.79 in the mediolateral direction. CONCLUSION: The equivalence of the test-retest and interrater coefficients obtained suggests that the measurement error of the COP-COM variable is mainly linked to the biologic variability of this measure over a short period of time. Using the mean of 4 trials stabilizes the COP-COM variable enough to be potentially used to evaluate clinical change.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2001

Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the intra- and intertester reliability of the universal goniometer (UG) and parallelogram goniometer (PG), and to assess the criterion validity of the same instruments on subjects with knee restrictions. DESIGN: Reliability and validation study. SETTING: Radiology department at university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty subjects (34 men, 26 women; mean age, 52yr) with various knee restrictions. INTERVENTIONS: Sixteen goniometric measurements were collected per patient by 2 physical therapists. Subjects were evaluated in knee flexion and knee extension positions. To serve as a gold standard, radiographs were taken in both positions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Active knee flexion and knee extension on 2 goniometers, radiographs. Maximum active range of motion (AROM). RESULTS: The UG intratester reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]) was .997 in flexion and .972 to .985 in extension. The results were also high with the PG (ICC =.996,.953-.955) for flexion and extension, respectively. The intertester reliability was high for flexion (ICC =.977-.982) and for extension (ICC =.893-.926) when using the UG. For the PG, ICC results ranged from .959 to .970 for flexion and from .856 to .898 for extension. Criterion validity (r) varied from .975 to .987 for flexion and from .390 to .442 for extension with the UG, and from .976 to .985 for flexion and .423 to .514 for extension with the PG. CONCLUSION: Intra- and intertester reliability were high for both goniometers. The results for the criterion validity varied. Our study also revealed that it is preferable to use goniometry rather than visual estimations when measuring AROM. It is recommended that the same therapist take all the measurements when assessing AROM for UG and PG goniometric measurements on patients with knee restrictions.

Anthropometry↗
PubMed2001

Measuring leg-length discrepancy by the "iliac crest palpation and book correction" method: reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and validity of a clinical measurement of leg-length discrepancy (LLD), by using the iliac crest palpation and book correction (ICPBC) method. DESIGN: Intra- and interrater reliability and validity determinations. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four healthy subjects, none of whom had an apparent LLD, as determined by iliac crest palpation. INTERVENTIONS: We induced a simulated LLD (7-53 mm) for each subject. To measure the LLD, the examiner performed the ICPBC method by palpating the iliac crests and correcting identified differences with a book opened to the required number of pages. The thickness of the book correction was measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability LLD measurement (n = 20), by using the ICPBC method to measure the LLD; construct validity (n = 34), comparing ICPBC measurement with the extent of the induced LLD; and concurrent validity (n = 14), the difference in heights of the superior aspect of the femoral heads from standing radiographs. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the intrarater and interrater reliabilities were.98 and.91, respectively. The ICCs for the construct and concurrent validities were.62 and.76, respectively. The ICPBC method underestimated the induced LLD by a mean difference +/- standard deviation of 3.8 +/- 10.3mm (p =.055) and the radiologic measure by 5.1 +/- 8.6 mm (p =.043). CONCLUSIONS: The ICPBC technique for measuring LLD is highly reliable and moderately valid. When there is no history of pelvic deformity and the iliac crests can be readily palpated, we recommend using iliac crest palpation to detect LLD, and the book correction to quantify it.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test to assess total mobility when bending forward in standing position. DESIGN: Experimental, prospective, correlational. SETTING: Rehabilitation and radiology departments in a university hospital in France. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients (6 women, 4 men; mean age, 42yr) with chronic low back pain (LBP) in the validity study; 32 LBP patients (16 women, 16 men; mean age, 52yr) in the reliability study; and 72 LBP patients (22 women, 50 men; mean age, 30yr) in the responsiveness study. INTERVENTIONS: Dynamic radiographs and fingertip-to-floor test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the validity study, 2 lateral radiographs of the upper dorsal spine, 1 in neutral position, and then 1 in full trunk flexion, were made. Validity was assessed by means of Spearman's correlation coefficient. Reliability was studied by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Responsiveness was assessed by the effect size and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: The Spearman's correlation coefficient for trunk flexion assessed by the test and the radiologic measure was excellent (r(s) = -.96). The intra- and interobserver reliability were excellent (ICC = .99). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. The values observed for the test were .97 for SRM and .87 for effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Because the fingertip-to-floor test has excellent validity, reliability, and responsiveness, it can be used in clinical practice and therapeutic trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Reliability and validity of combined imaging and pressures assessment methods for diabetic feet.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of using 3-dimensional (3D) spiral x-ray computed tomography (SXCT) imaging methods to measure anatomic foot structure and to test the validity of using a loading device to simulate walking pressures on the plantar foot during SXCT examination. DESIGN: Nonrandomized control trial of consecutive patients with complete data compared with age-matched controls. SETTING: A clinical SXCT scanner and physical therapy laboratory in a local hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eight subjects with diabetes and a history of forefoot ulcers and 8 control subjects. INTERVENTIONS: SXCT imaging and plantar pressure analysis were used to acquire 3D volumetric structure and pressure data of the foot during 4 foot positions, 2 weight bearing and 2 non-weight bearing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between repeated SXCT measures of foot structure. Comparisons of plantar foot pressure. Foot structure measurements. Methods for measuring the bony angles and soft-tissue thickness were developed and reliability tests were performed. RESULTS: There was essentially no bias (<+/-0.5mm or +/-0.5 degrees ) and a high degree of reliability (81% of the measures had a reliability <2.0mm or 2 degrees ) when measuring foot structures. Correlations of pressure measures collected on the loading device compared with those collected during walking were (mean +/- standard deviation) r =.66 +/-.06. The percentage agreement between the pressures collected on the loading device and during walking was 91.1% +/- 4.7%. CONCLUSION: Reliability of anatomic foot structure measurements and validity of plantar loading during visualization were good. These methods may be used to determine structural differences between diabetic and healthy feet and to evaluate how these differences relate to plantar pressures.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The Lichtman classification for Kienböck's disease: an assessment of reliability.

PURPOSE: The correct identification of Lichtman stage 3A and 3B Kienböck's disease is crucial for treatment purposes. The present study evaluates the reliability of the Lichtman classification, with specific attention to differentiating stage 3A and 3B. METHODS: Four reviewers evaluated wrist radiographs from 39 patients with Kienböck's disease. Radiographs were graded according to the traditional Lichtman classification, a modification of the Lichtman classification using a radioscaphoid angle of 60 degrees to subdivide stage 3, and 8 other radiographic measures. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability of the Lichtman classification was substantial (kappa coefficient 0.63), but Stage 3A was less reliably identified (kappa 0.38). The new modification of the Lichtman classification increased both the overall (kappa 0.81) and the stage 3A (kappa 0.75) interobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: The use of the radioscaphoid angle increases the interobserver reliability of the Lichtman classification. This should allow a better understanding of the clinically important distinction between stage 3A and 3B disease.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic quantification of chondropathy of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Several scoring systems have been proposed in order to quantify the degree of cartilage damage observed by arthroscopy of the knee in patients with osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inter-observer reliability of five different scoring systems of arthroscopic evaluation for chondropathy in osteoarthritis of the knee and to evaluate the utility of a training session between different observations on these scoring systems. METHODS: Videotapes of knee arthroscopies on five patients with osteoarthritis demonstrating different levels of severity of cartilage damage of the medial tibiofemoral compartment were analyzed by nine observers prior to (pre-training evaluation) and 2 months after a 6 h training session (post-training evaluation) by the following scoring systems: (1) cartilage deterioration by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), (2) overall assessment of degeneration in the entire medial compartment (cartilage, meniscus, osteophyte) using a 100 mm VAS, (3) French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Scoring System, (4) SFA Grading System, (5) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Scoring System. RESULTS: At the pre-training evaluation, the SFA grading system produced the highest coefficient of reliability (r = 0.94), the other systems recording levels of < or = 0.80. At the post-training evaluation, the coefficient of reliability was r > 0.80 for four of the five scoring systems, with lack of improvement in the ACR Scoring System. CONCLUSION: There was an improved and acceptable inter-observer reliability for at least 2 months follow-up in four of five evaluated scoring systems of arthroscopically graded osteoarthritis of the knee following a training session. A scoring system using a 100 mm VAS may produce the best inter-observer reliability. These results show that scoring chondropathy is possible and demonstrate the importance of training in the analysis of articular cartilage breakdown.

Arthroscopy↗
PubMed2004

[Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel].

This investigation addressed the question whether non-medical personnel could produce similar ratings to physicians when applying ADL scales. A sports scientist was trained in the assessment of stroke patients with the Barthel Index, the Activity Index and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. He and a rehabilitation physician assessed 20 stroke patients in first in-patient rehabilitation with these instruments. Measurements of inter-rater reliability were calculated for scores, subscales and single items, and for the latter also rater correspondence. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for all scores and subscales (ICC: 0.82-0.99). Reliability and correspondence was good to excellent for the items of the Barthel Scale, satisfactory to excellent for those of the Activity Index. Some 25 % of the items of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living revealed unsatisfactory reliability but still high inter-rater correspondence. Results indicate that physicians and non-medical personnel are able to apply these scales reliably to stroke patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Reliability of transcutaneous measurement of oxygen tension on the lower leg].

AIM: Measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension is increasingly used to determine the appropriate level of amputation in patients with vascular disease. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the intra- and interrater reliability of transcutaneous oxygen [tcpO (2)] measurements in a homogeneous study group. METHOD: Five investigators assessed the transcutaneous oxygen tension of both lower legs of seven persons in a fixed setting. Assessment was repeated with the same examiners and the same examinees after 24 hours. TcpO (2) was measured at the posterior aspect of the lower leg twenty centimeters below the knee joint line. The TCM 400 Monitoring System (Radiometer Medical AIS, Bronshoj, Denmark) was used. Statistical analysis of the intra- and interrater reliability was performed with the Spearman coefficient of correlation. RESULTS: An overall mean of 56.2 +/- 10.6 mmHg was found. For the first examination, a mean of 55.3 +/- 10.6 mmHg was observed, whereas for the second examination it was 57.0 +/- 10.5 mmHg. Analysis of intrarater reliability showed a coefficient of correlation of r (s) = 0.56 (p < 0.0001). For interrater reliability, we found coefficients of correlation ranging from r (s) = 0.20 (p = 0.20) to r (s) = 0.69 (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Analysis of transcutaneous oxygen tension measurements performed by different investigators in a fixed setting revealed a non- homogeneous intra- and interrater reliability, which should be taken into account prior to initiating therapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Outcome assessment in total knee arthroplasty: is the clinical measurement of range of motion a reliable measurable outcome variable?].

AIM: The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the reliability of the clinical assessment (visual and goniometric) of the range of motion of the knee joint. METHOD: 30 patients were assessed concerning the range of motion of their knee joints by visual and goniometric measurements. Assessment was performed by three investigators. The obtained data were used to analyse the intra- and interobserver reliability. Statistical analysis was performed using the Spearman coefficient of correlation [r (s)]. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was consistent across observers regarding the visual and goniometric assessment of flexion (r (s) > 0.6), whereas reliability was uniformly low for both measurements regarding the assessment of extension (r (s) < 0.6). Interobserver agreement was consistent across all three goniometric and two out of three visual assessments regarding the measurement of flexion (r (s) > 0.6); the interobserver reproducibility of extension, however, was uniformly low both for the visual and goniometric measurements (r (s) < 0.6). CONCLUSION: Reliability of clinical assessment of range of motion should be taken critically into consideration whilst performing classical function-related scoring systems when measuring outcome after total joint arthroplasty, since these scoring systems are strongly based on a valid and reliable assessment of range of motion.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗
PubMed2006

Reliability of repeated sprint exercise in non-motorised treadmill ergometry.

Although repeated sprint tests are relatively common, there have been few investigations of repeated sprint exercise using non-motorised treadmill ergometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a repeated sprint procedure using this apparatus. Ten healthy, active males, performed three repeated sprint tests (six repetitions of 6 s sprints with 30 s recovery) on three separate occasions. Performance as determined by maximal speed, average force production, and fatigue were compared across the three trials. Maximal speed and average force were not significantly different between visits (p < 0.05) and a variety of reliability measures suggested good agreement (e.g., coefficient of variations no more than 5 %). The fatigue indices for maximal speed and for average force were generally less reliable (coefficients of variation around 30 % in both cases). In conclusion, measures of performance (maximal speed and average force) can provide reliable results in a repeated sprint protocol but the reliability of fatigue measures appears to be low.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Reliability of different temporary myocardial pacing leads.

Temporary myocardial pacing leads are routinely used for diagnosis and treatment of postoperative arrhythmias following open-heart surgery. The intention of this study is to compare five different electrodes for reliability during the postoperative period. A standardised technique of implantation was used to place 147 ventricular and 81 atrial wire electrodes in 149 patients. During operation and then daily over the next ten days, the stimulation threshold, P- and R-wave sensing, and impedance were measured with a pacing system analyser to evaluate the reliability of the pacing and sensing function. Five measurements were taken at each time; the mean values were statistically analysed. The number of failures in pacing and sensing and the course of the tested parameters during the postoperative period were compared. As a result, bipolar pacing leads (Osypka TME 64a/66a) proved to be more reliable than unipolar wires (Ethicon HD 12S, Osypka TME 60/60a), particularly in atrial sensing. Also the Medtronic 6400/6500 showed good reliability for the ventricle, so that they can be recommended for VVI-mode pacing. In conclusion, for reliable function during the postoperative course up to 10 days a specially developed bipolar temporary pacemaker electrode can be recommended for both atrial and ventricular or sequential pacing.

Differential Threshold↗
PubMed2001

Reliability of a stool consistency classification system.

PURPOSE: Reliability and validity are important measures of the quality of a research or clinical instrument. This research determined the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of a stool consistency classification system and the agreement between the subjects' and expert investigators' classifications. METHODS: Two studies were conducted with adult volunteers. Stool consistency was described by words only and words + diagrams. To determine inter-rater reliability, subjects in each of 3 groups (20 nurses, 20 nursing students, and 20 lay persons) classified the consistency of 12 stool specimens. To determine test-retest reliability, 43 additional subjects classified the consistency of 9 stool specimens in 2 sessions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were reported per individual stool specimen and for all stool specimens. The outcome measures were the consistency classifications by the 3 groups of raters when the 2 types of descriptors (word only and word + diagram) were used. Other outcomes were the consistency classifications of the subjects on the 2 days of stool evaluation and the classifications of the subjects compared with those of the investigators. RESULTS: No significant difference was found among the stool consistency classifications among nurses, nursing students, or lay persons. Classifications were similar for 11 of 12 stool specimens when either word-only or word + diagram descriptions were used. No significant difference was found among the classifications between days 1 and 2. At least 75% of the subjects' classifications of stool consistency in both studies agreed highly with those of the investigators. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the stool consistency classification system are good. The word-only descriptions of the consistency classifications appeared to be equally as effective as the word + diagram descriptions.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Posterior disk displacement: morphologic assessment and measurement reliability-lumbar spine.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging is often used to assess for disk displacement after manipulation, but limited information about the true incidence of iatrogenic herniations exists. To design a study that evaluates for a causal relationship, preliminary data must be obtained relating to the size of different types of disk displacement. The reliability of chiropractic radiologists in assessing disks and a comparison of different measuring devices should also be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To identify average measurements for normal and displaced disks and to assess the reliability of measurements by chiropractic radiologists. STUDY DESIGN: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability study assessing disk displacement on magnetic resonance scans. METHODS: Three evaluators assessed the disks on 122 magnetic resonance scans from two imaging centers. Six categories were graded, and digitizer and ruler measurements were compared. Forty-four scans were reassessed for intraobserver agreement. Intraobserver and interobserver variations were measured with intraclass correlation coefficient and kappa statistical analysis. Measurement device correlation was assessed with Pearson's r. RESULTS: Clear size differences between different types of disk displacement were noted. Interexaminer measurement reliability was 0.78 to 0.84. Agreement concerning the presence of disk displacement was 85% (kappa = 0.68), and the classification of disk displacements was 76% (kappa = 0.60). Intraexaminer measurement reliability was 0.40 to 0.49. Intraexaminer agreement concerning the presence of disk displacement was 76% (kappa = 0.52), and the classification of disk displacements was 62% to 69% (kappa = 0.38 to 0.46). Normal versus bulged disk distinctions demonstrated the most disagreement. The ruler and digitizer correlation coefficient was 0.968. CONCLUSIONS: Different disk types demonstrated distinct size averages. Interexaminer agreement was good concerning disk assessment and measurements. Intraexaminer agreement was lower than expected. A millimetric ruler is an acceptable alternative to digital measurement devices.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Posterior disk displacement: morphologic assessment and measurement reliability--cervical spine.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to assess for disk displacement after manipulation, but limited information about the true incidence of iatrogenic herniations exists. Preliminary data must be obtained concerning the size of different types of displacement to further assess this relationship. The reliability of chiropractic radiologists in assessing disks, and a comparison of measuring devices should be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To identify average measurements for normal and displaced disks and to assess the reliability of measurements by chiropractic radiologists. STUDY DESIGN: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability study assessing cervical disk displacement on MRI scans. METHODS: Three evaluators assessed the disks on 106 MRI scans. Six categories were assessed and compared. Thirty-seven scans were reassessed for intraobserver comparisons. Interobserver and intraobserver variations and measurement-device correlations were determined. RESULTS: Interexaminer measurement reliability for the 2 devices was 0.80 to 0.84. Intraexaminer reliability ranged from 0.58 to 0.94. Interexaminer and intraexaminer agreement for the presence of disk displacement was 86% (kappa = 0.69) and 78% to 85% (kappa = 0.50-0.67), respectively; for the presence of osteophytes, 92% (kappa = 0.54) and 86% to 95% (kappa = 0.60-0.80); and for the classification of disk displacements, 76% (kappa = 0.53) and 73% to 80% (kappa 0.44-0.61). Distinguishing between normal versus bulged disks demonstrated the greatest classification disagreement. Clear size differences between the types of disk displacement were noted. The ruler and digitizer correlation coefficient was 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Interexaminer and intraexaminer agreement were good to very good concerning measurements and fair to good concerning disk assessments. Different disk displacement types demonstrated obvious mean size differences. No significant mean difference in measurements between the ruler and the digitizer was noted.

Adolescent↗