Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Recovery Room”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Comparison of the effect of desflurane with isoflurane in patients over 65 years of age: multicenter study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of desflurane (DES) and isoflurane (ISO) in patients over 65 years of age based on recovery, hemodynamic variables, need for additional drugs and postoperative rates of nausea and vomiting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients were anesthetized with DES (n = 51) at an inspired concentration of 3% or ISO (n = 47) at a concentration of 0.5%, both combined with 60% nitrous oxide. Anesthetic concentration was later adjusted to maintain hemodynamic variables within 20% above or below baseline. Analgesia was provided with fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxation with atracurium. After surgery, anesthetic gases were withdrawn. We then recorded variables related to anesthetic recovery, postoperative analgesia and the rates of nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Mean time (+/- SD) until eye opening was 7.6 +/- 5.5 minutes for patients anesthetized with DES and was significantly less than the 14.4 +/- 8.9 minutes taken by patients anesthetized with ISO (p < 0.01). Patients anesthetized with DES spent 23 minutes less time in the recovery room than did patients anesthetized with ISO (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in need for fentanyl, atracurium, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic variables or rates of nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Patients over 65 years of age anesthetized with DES recovered in half the time of patients anesthetized with ISO. DES is a safe anesthetic for elderly patients and may offer clinical advantages.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of propofol, midazolam, and methohexital for sedation during retrobulbar and peribulbar block.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of propofol, methohexital, and midazalom in providing adequate sedation during administration of retrobulbar block and satisfactory postoperative amnesia. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review over a 4-month period. SETTING: Ambulatory patients in the main operating room of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-seven ambulatory patients undergoing ophthalmologic surgery of less than 2 hours' duration under regional anesthesia consisting of retrobulbar or peribulbar block and intravenous (IV) sedation. INTERVENTIONS: One of three drugs--propofol 0.47 +/- 0.06 mg/kg, midazolam 0.02 +/- 0.005 mg/kg, or methohexital 0.45 +/- 0.16 mg/kg--was administered IV. Patients were observed for a minimum of 60 seconds or until adequate sedation was achieved, after which a retrobulbar or peribulbar block was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and oxygen saturation were monitored and recorded. Patients were observed for apnea, hiccups, pain on injection, excitement, tremor, grimacing, or verbal response during the block. The requirement for additional sedation intraoperatively was noted. Patients were questioned postoperatively in the ambulatory recovery room for recall of needle insertion or discomfort during the block, as well as about their satisfaction with the overall experience. CONCLUSIONS: Grimacing or verbal response during the retrobulbar or peribulbar block did not predict or correlate with patient recall. Propofol was equal to both midazolam and methohexital in providing adequate sedation and postoperative amnesia but possesses the added advantages of reduced postoperative vomiting, lower intraocular pressure, and earlier return-to-home readiness.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1995

Postoperative morphine requirements, nausea and vomiting following anaesthesia for tonsillectomy. Comparison of intravenous morphine and non-opioid analgesic techniques.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to be as effective as opioid analgesia following tonsillectomy in children. Opioids are still frequently used but tonsillectomy is associated with a high incidence of vomiting. This study has attempted to assess postoperative analgesic consumption and nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for tonsillectomy using either paracetamol premedication, paracetamol plus a NSAID or intravenous morphine to provide postoperative analgesia. Some children required a rescue dose of morphine in the recovery room, including some who had received intravenous morphine at induction. Least supplementary morphine was required by those who had received paracetamol plus ketorolac. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly less in the two groups which were not given intraoperative morphine. The number of vomiting incidents was also much less. We conclude that the preoperative administration of paracetamol alone provides satisfactory analgesia in many children but that supplementary analgesia is still required for some.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1998

A double blind randomized comparison of oral trimeprazine-methadone and ketamine-midazolam for sedation of pediatric dental patients for oral surgical procedures.

The safety and efficacy of an oral sedation technique for children having minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia were studied. One hundred healthy children between the ages of 2 and 7 yr received either a combination of midazolam (0.35 mg/kg) and ketamine (5 mg/kg) (Group A), or a combination of trimeprazine (3 mg/kg) and methadone (0.2 mg/kg) (Group B) 30 min preoperatively. Hemodynamic parameters, adverse reactions, postoperative recovery, and behavior were evaluated. More children were asleep, but rousable to verbal commands, 30 min after drug administration in Group A (40%) than in Group B (8%). Immediately before the dental procedure, 46% of children in Group A were asleep in contrast to 8% of children in group B. Significantly more children in Group A were awake, coughing, crying, and moving purposefully 30 and 60 min after admission to the recovery room. Two children (4%) in Group A vomited. Ten (20%) children in Group A hallucinated compared to none in Group B. The surgeon rated the procedure as good or very good in 94% of children in Group A compared to 78% in Group B. Our results show that the combination of midazolam and ketamine, administered orally, is a safe, effective, and practical approach to managing children for minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of three techniques on time to awakening, time to orientation and incidence of nausea and vomiting using alfentanil in balanced anesthesia in an outpatient surgical setting.

Maximizing patient safety and comfort while minimizing adverse sequelae are continuing anesthetic challenges. The purpose of this study was to examine three anesthetic techniques utilizing alfentanil with regard to time to awakening, time to orientation and incidence of nausea and vomiting. Surgical procedures were limited to knee arthroscopy, laparoscopy and dental extractions. Unpremedicated ASA I/II outpatients (n = 74) between the ages of 18 and 59 were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group I: alfentanil + 67% N2O + 33% O2 Group II: alfentanil + 67% N2O + 33% O2 + droperidol 0.015 mg/kg Group III: alfentanil + 100% O2 + 0.7% isoflurane Anesthesia was induced with alfentanil 40 micrograms/kg, atracurium 0.4 mg/kg, thiamylal 4 mg/kg and 100% O2 and was maintained according to group assignment. The anesthetic was supplemented as clinically indicated with incremental boluses of alfentanil 10 micrograms/kg. Upon completion of surgery, muscle relaxation was reversed with edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg and atropine 0.015 mg/kg. Analyses indicated that the three groups were comparable in terms of potentially confounding variables including gender, race, surgical procedure, age, percent of ideal body weight, case length and dose of alfentanil in micrograms/kg/hr. Time to awakening was significantly shorter in the two N2O groups by approximately 1.5 minutes, as compared to the O2 and isoflurane group (p = .0060). Time to orientation was significantly shorter in the N2O groups by approximately 1.5 minutes also, as compared to the O2 and isoflurane group (p = .0142). The two N2O groups did not differ significantly in either measure. The incidence of vomiting in the postanesthesia recovery room (PARR) indicated a significant difference (p = .0317) among groups with vomiting occurring 45.8% of the time in Group I, 28.8% of the time in Group II and 8% of the time in Group III. Total emetic score (nausea and vomiting) in the PARR indicated a significant difference (p = .03) among groups with symptoms occurring 50% of the time in Group I, 28% of the time in Group II, and 16% of the time in Group III.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed1998

The role of newer opioids in geriatric anesthesia.

The unique features of remifentanil are its rapid clearance and rapid ke0, resulting in a rapid onset and offset of drug effect. It is tempting to speculate that these characteristics will make remifentanil an easy drug to titrate, and that clinicians will not need to consider patient covariates such as advanced age when choosing a dosing regimen. However, the rapid onset of drug effect may be accompanied by rapid onset of adverse events such as apnea and muscle rigidity. The rapid offset of drug effect can result in patients who are in severe pain at a time when the anesthesiologist is ill equipped to deal the problem, for example when the patient is in transit to the recovery room. It is thus important that when treating elderly patients anesthesiologists understand the proper dose adjustment required for the elderly. By adjusting the bolus and infusion doses, the anesthesiologist can hope to avoid the peaks and valleys that might expose these patients to risk. When the proper adjustment is made, the variability in remifentanil pharmacokinetics is considerably less than for any other intravenous opioid. This makes remifentanil the most predictable opioid for treatment of the elderly.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The differential cost of anesthesia and recovery with propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia versus thiopental sodium-isoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the recovery room profile of propofol in outpatient anesthesia and to compare it to the profile of a standard technique. DESIGN: A comparative, randomized, double-blind, third-party open study. SETTING: Ambulatory Surgery Center at The Emory Clinic. PATIENTS: Ninety-nine ASA physical status I, II, or III nonpregnant female patients who had been diagnosed as needing breast biopsies. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were given 1 microgram/kg of fentanyl prior to induction. Those in the propofol group were induced with 2.0 to 2.5 mg/kg of propofol and maintained with a 100 to 200 microgram/kg/min infusion of propofol with nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen (O2). In the thiopental sodium-isoflurane group, patients were induced with 4.0 to 5.0 mg/kg of thiopental sodium and maintained with isoflurane and N2O in O2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recovery from anesthesia was assessed by an evaluator who was unaware of the anesthetic technique used for each patient. Immediate recovery time was measured in terms of awakening, response to verbal command, and orientation to time and place. A brief postoperative follow-up questionnaire was completed to assess the patients' subjective feelings regarding their ability to eat, concentrate, and resume normal activities. In the thiopental sodium-isoflurane group, 15 of 50 patients (30%) had nausea and vomiting, but in the propofol group, only 4 of 49 patients (8.1%) had nausea and vomiting (p less than 0.01). The latter group resumed normal activity (i.e., reading and watching television) 7.93 +/- 0.76 hours postanesthesia, whereas the thiopental sodium-isoflurane group resumed normal activity 17.02 +/- 1.21 hours postanesthesia (p less than 0.001). Patients in the propofol group returned to work in an average of 1.5 +/- 0.09 days, compared with 2.0 +/- 0.09 days for the thiopental sodium-isoflurane group (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The propofol group needed less nursing care and returned to more productive activity earlier than did the thiopental sodium-isoflurane group.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1986

Immersion anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Review of two hundred twenty treatments.

Two hundred twenty extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatments at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center between September, 1984, and April, 1985, were reviewed with respect to anesthetic management. One hundred seventy-four treatments (79%) were performed under a regional anesthetic technique (RA), either with an indwelling epidural catheter (155 treatments), or with a single spinal injection (19 treatments). Forty-six treatments (21%) were performed under general anesthesia (GA). Ninety per cent of the patients were classified as ASA I or II. Hypotension during treatment, defined as blood pressure falls greater than 20 per cent of baseline mean arterial pressure, was recorded with 19.5 per cent of the regional anesthetic treatments (18.7% of the epidurals and 26.3% of the spinals) and 13.0 per cent of the general anesthetic treatments. Blood pressure falls were larger in the regional group than in the general group. The average recovery room stay was longer for the bupivacaine (0.25-0.5%) epidurals and the tetracaine (0.4%) spinals (252 min and 212.1 min, respectively) than for the lidocaine (1.5-2.0%) epidurals and the general anesthetics (101.7 min and 102.1 min, respectively). General anesthesia, with controlled ventilation, was advantageous in minimizing renal excursion and stone movement during treatment. Yet, in appropriately selected and sedated patients, regional anesthesia with continuous lidocaine epidural techniques was found to provide acceptable anesthesia for patients undergoing ESWL.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Epidural fentanyl does not influence intravenous PCA requirements in the post-caesarean patient.

Forty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery were studied to determine the effect of epidural fentanyl on post-Caesarean delivery analgesic requirements as administered by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Following delivery of the infant, under epidural anaesthesia with lidocaine 2% with 1/200,000 epinephrine, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 ml of preservative-free normal saline via the epidural catheter or 100 micrograms of fentanyl with 8 ml preservative-free normal saline in a double-blinded fashion. On arrival in the post-anesthesia recovery room (PAR), patients were provided with intravenous PCA meperidine 12.5 mg every eight minutes as needed. Patients were visited at intervals over the next 24 hr to determine if any differences in narcotic requirements, demands for narcotics, or severity of pain were noted. No differences were observed in any values between the groups. It is concluded that a single bolus of epidural fentanyl does not provide an advantage for postoperative pain relief in this patient population.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1991

[Effects of intravenous clonidine on postoperative shivering].

A study was designed to assess the possible effects of intravenous clonidine on postoperative shivering. Fifty patients undergoing spinal fusion under isoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 25). Patients in one group were given intravenous clonidine (5 micrograms.kg-1 during the first hour, and 0.3 microgram.kg-1.h-1 thereafter) or placebo. Shivering intensity (rated from 0 to 2) and pulmonary artery blood temperature (theta) was recorded every ten minutes for two hours. Haemodynamic and metabolic data were obtained by way of a Swan-Ganz catheter prior to administering the test drug, and then after 1 and 2 hours. On arrival at the recovery room, theta was 36.2 +/- 0.3 degrees C in the clonidine group, and 36.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C in the placebo group. There were no significant differences in shivering between the two groups. Clonidine significantly decreased blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and whole body oxygen consumption. The patients in these series were free from any cardiac disease. Further studies are required to assess the possible beneficial effects of clonidine on postoperative oxygen consumption in patients suffering from heart failure.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Oral midazolam is an effective premedication for children having day-stay anaesthesia.

The effect of oral premedication was studied in a double-blind, randomised trial of 200 children undergoing day-stay anaesthesia. Midazolam 0.25 mg/kg, midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, diazepam 0.5 mg/kg or a placebo was given orally one hour prior to anaesthesia. Patient state was assessed at nine stages, from administration of the premedication up to and including induction of anaesthesia, using a four-point behavioural scale. Patient state was also assessed postoperatively in the recovery area and the day-stay ward. There was no difference between the four groups until induction of anaesthesia. At this stage 82% of children were either asleep or awake and calm. Patients who received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg were more likely to be asleep or awake and calm at induction rather than other groups (P = 0.05). Children receiving midazolam 0.5 mg/kg or diazepam 0.5 mg/kg slept longest in the post anaesthetic recovery room (P less than 0.005), and spent most time there (P less than .005). There was no difference between groups in the length of time spent in the day-stay ward or in the number of overnight admissions. The study shows that a high proportion of unsedated children are calm at induction of anaesthesia and that oral midazolam is an effective premedication in children for day-stay anaesthesia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accelerated recovery from severe preeclampsia: uterine curettage versus nifedipine.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the ability of uterine curettage and nifedipine to accelerate postpartum recovery from severe preeclampsia. METHODS: Forty-five parturients with severe preeclampsia were randomly assigned to one of three groups following delivery. Patients in group 1 were managed with intravenous magnesium sulfate (2 g/hour) and observed in the obstetric recovery room until blood pressure had stabilized (systolic blood pressure less than 150 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg) and adequate diuresis was noted. Group 2 was treated in a similar manner but with the addition of oral nifedipine, 10 mg every 4 hours postpartum for 48 hours. Group 3 underwent an ultrasound-directed curettage immediately following delivery in the delivery/operating room and was then treated as in group 1. All three groups were assessed postpartum for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and urine output (UO) every 2 hours, hematocrit and platelet count every 6 hours, and lactic dehydrogenase/aspartate aminotransferase every 12 hours for 48 hours postpartum. RESULTS: Fifteen women were assigned to each of the three treatment groups. The MAP decreased significantly (P < .0001) in all three groups during the first 48 hours postpartum. Treatment interaction indicated specific differences among the groups. Standard therapy (group 1) was significantly inferior to nifedipine (group 2) and curettage (group 3) in regard to MAP decrease (P = .0017) and UO increase (P = .0137). No statistical differences existed between nifedipine and curettage. The rise in the platelet count following delivery was significantly different among the three groups (P = .033), with a much more rapid recovery in the curettage group (12-18 hours) than in the other groups (P = .0106). CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine and uterine curettage both appear to accelerate recovery from severe preeclampsia, as measured by MAP and UO. Uterine curettage appears the most effective in rapidly resolving the thrombocytopenia associated with severe preeclampsia.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

A comparison of sevoflurance to halothane in paediatric surgical patients: results of a multicentre international study.

Induction, emergence and recovery characteristics were compared during sevoflurane or halothane anaesthetic in a large (428) multicentre, international study of children undergoing elective inpatient surgical procedures. Two hundred and fourteen children in each group underwent inhalation induction with nitrous oxide/oxygen and sevoflurane or halothane. Incremental doses of either study drug were added until loss of eyelash reflex was achieved. Steady state concentrations of anaesthesia were maintained until the end of surgery when anaesthetic agents were terminated simultaneously. Time variables were recorded for induction, emergence and the first need for analgesia in the recovery room. In addition, in 86 of the children in both groups, venous blood samples were drawn for plasma fluoride levels during and after surgery. There was a trend toward smoother induction (induction of anaesthesia without coughing, breath holding, excitement laryngospasm, bronchospasm, increased secretion, and vomiting) in the sevoflurane group with faster induction (2.1 min vs 2.9 min, P = 0.037) and rapid emergence times (10.3 min vs 13.9 min, P = 0.003). Among the children given sevoflurane, 2% developed bradycardia compared with 11% in the halothane group. Postoperatively, 46% of the children in the halothane group developed nausea and or vomiting versus 31% in the sevoflurane group (P = 0.002). Two children in the halothane group developed cardiac dysrhythmia and were dropped from the study. In addition, a child in the halothane group developed malignant hyperthermia, received dantrolene, and had an uneventful recovery. Mean maximum inorganic fluoride concentration was 18.3 microM.l-1. The fluoride concentrations peaked within one h of termination of sevoflurane anaesthetic and returned rapidly to baseline within 48 h. This study suggests that sevoflurane may be the drug of choice for the anaesthetic management of children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Recovery after propofol, midazolam, and methohexitone as an adjunct to epidural anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery.

Employing a randomized study design, the intra- and post-operative effects of three sedative agents were compared in 30 female patients under regional anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. After establishing epidural blockade to a level of T4, 10 patients were sedated with propofol 2.79 +/- 0.4 mg kg-1 h-1, 10 with midazolam 0.08 +/- 0.01 mg kg-1 h-1, and a further 10 patients with methohexitone 1.8 +/- 0.2 mg kg-1 h-1 (mean dose +/- SEM). An additional 10 patients did not receive any sedative agent and served as a control group. There was excellent haemodynamic stability in all groups. They were comparable with respect to respiratory rate, SpO2, and PaCO2. Testing of vigilance showed significant differences between peri-operative and baseline scores and those found in the recovery room in all three groups with intra-operative sedation; in the midazolam group vigilance was still impaired the day following surgery. There were significant differences in the post-operative vigilance scores between patients sedated during surgery and the control group; in the methohexitone group even 24 h later. The ability to concentrate was particularly impaired in patients treated with methohexitone. Patients treated with midazolam or methohexitone needed longer to recall their date of birth than those sedated with propofol.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1999

The clinical outcome of abdominoplasty performed under conscious sedation: increased use of fentanyl correlated with longer stay in outpatient unit.

The objective of this study was to present data supporting the effectiveness of performing mini and full abdominoplasties under conscious sedation with local anesthesia. The authors performed 20 such operations between 1994 and 1996, using a combination of midazolam (Versed) and fentanyl instead of general anesthesia (without an anesthesiologist or nurse anesthetist present). At 5- to 10-minute intervals, the surgeon would order the injection of 1 cc (1 mg/ml) of midazolam and 1 cc (50 microg/ml) of fentanyl. The amount and the interval varied based on the patient's level of sedation. Blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and the patient's response to verbal and physical stimuli were used to assess the sedation level. Average operating time was 147.5 minutes, and mean length of stay in the outpatient recovery room was 235.5 minutes. The average amounts of midazolam and fentanyl used were 9.4 mg (6 to 12.5 mg) and 532 microg (300 to 800 microg), respectively. The average age of patients in this group was 41.7 years (28 to 63 years). Nineteen patients were discharged the same day. There were no surgical complications and no complication related to the sedation (such as respiratory or cardiac compromise). The average follow-up of these patients was 1.2 years (range, 3 to 21 months). Correlation coefficient rates and regression rates were calculated. The longer the procedure, the more midazolam was used intraoperatively (r = 0.5, p = 0.03). However, there was no correlation between the length of the procedure and the amount of fentanyl used. Rather, there was a positive correlation demonstrating that patients who received more fentanyl stayed longer in the outpatient recovery area after surgery (r = 0.6, p < 0.01). The age of the patients and the amount of midazolam did not correlate with how fast they went home from the outpatient area. In conclusion, full and mini abdominoplasties can be performed safely using conscious sedation without compromising patient care or surgical outcome. Second, the survey revealed that patient satisfaction with these procedures performed under conscious sedation was very high. Third, the increased use of fentanyl, not midazolam, resulted in a longer stay in the outpatient unit after surgery. Nausea is a known side effect of narcotic analgesics, and it correlated with a higher dose of fentanyl administration in the patients. The authors are now routinely administering a dose of either droperidol or odansetron (Zofran) preoperatively (both are antiemetics). Previously, the ratio of midazolam and fentanyl injection was 1:1 every 5 to 10 minutes, but now it is 2: 1 to 4: 1 every 5 to 10 minutes (a smaller dose of fentanyl is administered). The conscious sedation technique should be an option for patients and plastic surgeons in academic and community hospital settings if they desire.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of ketorolac tromethamine/oxycodone versus patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients.

Effective postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects remains an important goal in enabling increasingly complex surgical procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis. In this study, we examined the efficacy of postoperative analgesia in 90 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft, with a 24-hour hospital stay. Patients were randomized to receive either intramuscular ketorolac supplemented by oral oxycodone, or intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, for postoperative analgesia. Patients were monitored for 2 hours in the recovery room, then every 4 hours until discharge, for the presence of complications of nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and dizziness. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on the morning of postoperative day one. All patients were discharged by 24 hours after surgery. Ten (20%) of the patients receiving ketorolac/oxycodone versus 31 (79%) of those receiving PCA morphine experienced postoperative complications (P < .05). Postoperative nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were each significantly more common in the PCA morphine group (P < .05). The incidence of pruritus and dizziness was low overall. There was no significant difference between groups in the severity of postoperative pain as assessed using a VAS. We conclude that ketorolac/oxycodone may provide comparable analgesia with fewer undesirable side effects than PCA morphine in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients receiving ketorolac/oxymorphone may have a better quality recovery and more rapid discharge.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗
PubMed1992

Total intravenous anesthesia with a continuous propofol-alfentanil infusion.

A total intravenous anesthetic using propofol and alfentanil was evaluated to determine if it would provide a shorter recovery-room stay than a more traditional balanced anesthetic using isoflurane and alfentanil. Forty-three ASA I or II patients between 17 and 50 years of age undergoing major abdominal or orthopedic procedures were studied. The propofol group received alfentanil 50 mg/kg followed by propofol 1 mg/kg for anesthesia induction. Continuous propofol infusion was initiated at induction using 170 mg/kg/min for 10 minutes, followed by 130 mg/kg/min for 10 minutes, then maintained at 100 mg/kg/min until 10 minutes before the end of surgery. Ventilation was supported with an air-oxygen mixture. The group receiving balanced anesthesia received alfentanil 1 mg/kg, and anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental 4 mg/kg. A 1% isoflurane inhalation with air-oxygen was initiated immediately upon induction. Both groups received a continuous infusion of alfentanil titrated to maintain heart rate within 10% of preinduction levels. Recovery from anesthesia was measured using a subjective pain assessment, a verbal fluency test, and a short-term memory test. No differences were detected in the rate of recovery at 30 minutes or 60 minutes postextubation. Hemodynamic stability during induction and intubation was slightly better in the propofol group than in the isoflurane group. One episode each of intraoperative awareness and delayed eye opening occurred in the propofol group. Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil is just as effective as a balanced inhalation anesthetic and provides equally rapid recovery. However, practitioners are cautioned to include an amnestic adjuvant when using propofol as the sole anesthetic agent.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The comparative dose-response effects of melatonin and midazolam for premedication of adult patients: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

UNLABELLED: We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to compare the perioperative effects of different doses of melatonin and midazolam. Doses of 0.05, 0.1, or 0. 2 mg/kg sublingual midazolam or melatonin or placebo were given to 84 women, approximately 100 min before a standard anesthetic. Sedation, anxiety, and orientation were quantified before, 10, 30, 60, and 90 min after premedication, and 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after admission to the recovery room. Psychomotor performance of the patient was evaluated at these times also, by using the digit-symbol substitution test and Trieger dot test. Patients who received premedication with either midazolam or melatonin had a significant decrease in anxiety levels and increase in levels of sedation preoperatively compared with control subjects. Patients in the three midazolam groups experienced significant psychomotor impairment in the preoperative period compared with melatonin or placebo. After operation, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg midazolam premedication had increased levels of sedation at 90 min compared with 0.05 and 0. 1 mg/kg melatonin groups. In addition, patients in the three midazolam groups had impairment of performance on the digit-symbol substitution test at all times compared with the 0.05 mg/kg melatonin group. Premedication with 0.05 mg/kg melatonin was associated with preoperative anxiolysis and sedation without impairment of cognitive and psychomotor skills or affecting the quality of recovery. IMPLICATIONS: Premedication with 0.05 mg/kg melatonin was associated with preoperative anxiolysis and sedation without impairment of cognitive and psychomotor skills or affecting the quality of recovery.

Adolescent↗